True/False Questions
1. Sunk costs are costs that have proven to be unproductive.
Ans: False AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Medium
2. All costs are avoidable in a decision except sunk costs and future costs that do not differ between the alternatives at hand.
Ans: True AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy
3. Consistency demands that a cost that is relevant in one decision be regarded as relevant in other decisions as well.
Ans: False AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Medium
4. A cost may be relevant for one decision making situation but irrelevant for another situation.
Ans: True AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy
5. A future cost that does not vary among alternatives under consideration is irrelevant.
Ans: True AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy
6. Opportunity costs represent economic benefits that are forgone as a result of pursuing some course of action.
Ans: True AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy
7. An existing asset should not be replaced until its original cost has been fully recovered.
8. Fixed costs are irrelevant in decisions about whether a product line should be dropped.
Ans: False AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 2 Level: Easy
9. In a special order situation, any fixed cost associated with the order would be irrelevant.
Ans: False AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 4 Level: Medium
10. When a company has a production constraint, total contribution margin will be
maximized by emphasizing the products with the highest contribution margin per unit of the constrained resource.
Ans: True AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 5 Level: Easy
11. Eliminating nonproductive time is particularly important in a bottleneck operation.
Ans: True AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 5 Level: Medium
12. One way to increase the effective utilization of a bottleneck is to reduce the number of defective units.
Ans: True AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 5 Level: Easy
13. As a general guide, it is profitable to continue processing joint products after the split-off point if their total revenues exceed the joint costs.
Ans: False AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Medium
14. Joint costs are irrelevant in the decision of whether to sell a joint product at the split-off point or process it further and then sell it.
15. A key advantage of using activity-based costing is that any cost that is assigned to a product is also a relevant cost in any decision involving that product.
Ans: False AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy
Multiple Choice Questions
16. Costs which can be eliminated in whole or in part if a particular business segment is discontinued are called:
A) sunk costs. B) opportunity costs. C) avoidable costs. D) irrelevant costs.
Ans: C AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy
17. Consider the following statements:
I. Assemble all costs associated with each alternative being considered. II. Eliminate those costs that are sunk.
III. Eliminate those costs that differ between alternatives.
Which of the above statements does not represent a step in identifying the relevant costs in a decision problem?
A) Only I B) Only II C) Only III D) Only I and III
Ans: C AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy
18. Which of the following cash flows is relevant in a decision about accepting Alternative X or Alternative Y?
A) a cash inflow for Alternative X that is not a cash inflow for Alternative Y. B) a cash inflow that is lost if Alternative X is accepted and is not lost if
Alternative Y is accepted.
C) a cash outflow that is avoided if Alternative X is accepted and is not avoided if Alternative Y is accepted.
D) all of the above.
Ans: D AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Medium 19. Which of the following best describes an opportunity cost:
A) it is a relevant cost in decision making, but is not part of the traditional accounting records.
B) it is not a relevant cost in decision making, but is part of the traditional accounting records.
C) it is a relevant cost in decision making, and is part of the traditional accounting records.
D) it is not a relevant cost in decision making, and is not part of the traditional accounting records.
Ans: A AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Medium Source: CPA, adapted
20. Consider the following statements:
I. A division's net operating income, after deducting both traceable and allocated common corporate costs, is negative.
II. The division's avoidable fixed costs exceed its contribution margin.
III. The division's traceable fixed costs plus its allocated common corporate costs exceed its contribution margin.
Which of the above statements give an economic reason for eliminating the division? A) Only I
21. The Jabba Company manufactures the “Snack Buster” which consists of a wooden snack chip bowl with an attached porcelain dip bowl. Which of the following would be relevant in Jabba's decision to make the dip bowls or buy them from an outside supplier?
Fixed overhead cost The variable that can be eliminated if selling the bowls are purchased cost of the from the outside supplier Snack Buster
A) Yes Yes
B) Yes No
C) No Yes
D) No No
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium
22. The acceptance of a special order will improve overall net operating income so long as the revenue from the special order exceeds:
A) the contribution margin on the order.
B) the incremental costs associated with the order. C) the variable costs associated with the order. D) the sunk costs associated with the order.
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 4 Level: Medium
23. Kinsi Corporation manufactures five different products. All five of these products must pass through a stamping machine in its fabrication department. This machine is Kinsi's constrained resource. Kinsi would make the most profit if it produces the product that:
A) uses the lowest number of stamping machine hours. B) generates the highest contribution margin per unit. C) generates the highest contribution margin ratio.
D) generates the highest contribution margin per stamping machine hour.
Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 5 Level: Medium
24. In a sell or process further decision, consider the following costs:
I. A variable production cost incurred prior to split-off. II. A variable production cost incurred after split-off.
III. An avoidable fixed production cost incurred after split-off.
Which of the above costs is (are) not relevant in a decision regarding whether the product should be processed further?
A) Only I B) Only III C) Only I and II D) Only I and III
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Easy
25. Gandy Company has 5,000 obsolete desk lamps that are carried in inventory at a manufacturing cost of $50,000. If the lamps are reworked for $20,000, they could be sold for $35,000. Alternatively, the lamps could be sold for $8,000 for scrap. In a decision model analyzing these alternatives, the sunk cost would be:
A) $8,000 B) $15,000 C) $20,000 D) $50,000
Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy Source: CPA, adapted
26. Hodge Inc. has some material that originally cost $74,600. The material has a scrap value of $57,400 as is, but if reworked at a cost of $1,500, it could be sold for $54,400. What would be the incremental effect on the company's overall profit of reworking and selling the material rather than selling it as is as scrap?
A) -$79,100 B) -$21,700 C) -$4,500 D) $52,900
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking
AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Medium Source: CIMA, adapted
Solution:
Incremental revenue from reworking ($54,400 − $1,500) $52,900 Less incremental revenue from selling as scrap ... 57,400 Net loss from reworking ... ($ 4,500)
27. Milford Corporation has in stock 16,100 kilograms of material R that it bought five years ago for $5.75 per kilogram. This raw material was purchased to use in a product line that has been discontinued. Material R can be sold as is for scrap for $3.91 per kilogram. An alternative would be to use material R in one of the company's current products, S88Y, which currently requires 2 kilograms of a raw material that is available for $7.60 per kilogram. Material R can be modified at a cost of $0.77 per kilogram so that it can be used as a substitute for this material in the production of product S88Y. However, after modification, 4 kilograms of material R is required for every unit of product S88Y that is produced. Milford Corporation has now received a request from a company that could use material R in its production process. Assuming that Milford Corporation could use all of its stock of material R to make product S88Y or the company could sell all of its stock of the material at the current scrap price of $3.91 per kilogram, what is the minimum acceptable selling price of material R to the company that could use material R in its own production process?
A) $0.88 B) $3.03 C) $4.57 D) $3.91
Solution: Product S88Y:
Current cost (2 kg @ $7.60): $15.20
If material R were used, 4 kilograms would be needed. It currently costs $15.20 for Product S88Y; to maintain this same cost, material R would need to cost $3.03 per kilogram [($15.20 ÷ 4 kg) − $0.77]. The company should sell material R for $3.91 per kilogram.
28. Otool Inc. is considering using stocks of an old raw material in a special project. The special project would require all 240 kilograms of the raw material that are in stock and that originally cost the company $2,112 in total. If the company were to buy new supplies of this raw material on the open market, it would cost $9.25 per kilogram. However, the company has no other use for this raw material and would sell it at the discounted price of $8.35 per kilogram if it were not used in the special project. The sale of the raw material would involve delivery to the purchaser at a total cost of $71.00 for all 240 kilograms. What is the relevant cost of the 240 kilograms of the raw material when deciding whether to proceed with the special project?
A) $1,933 B) $2,004 C) $2,220 D) $2,112
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Hard Source: CIMA, adapted
Solution:
Opportunity cost of sales foregone if special project is
undertaken ($8.35 × 240) ... $2,004 Less: delivery cost ... 71 Relevant cost of 240 kilograms of raw material ... $1,933
29. Hamby Corporation is preparing a bid for a special order that would require 780 liters of material W34C. The company already has 640 liters of this raw material in stock that originally cost $8.30 per liter. Material W34C is used in the company's main product and is replenished on a periodic basis. The resale value of the existing stock of the material is $7.60 per liter. New stocks of the material can be readily purchased for $8.35 per liter. What is the relevant cost of the 780 liters of the raw material when deciding how much to bid on the special order?
A) $6,481 B) $6,376 C) $6,513 D) $5,928
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Hard Source: CIMA, adapted
Solution:
Relevant cost = $8.35 per liter × 780 liters = $6,513
30. Schickel Inc. regularly uses material B39U and currently has in stock 460 liters of the material for which it paid $3,128 several weeks ago. If this were to be sold as is on the open market as surplus material, it would fetch $5.95 per liter. New stocks of the material can be purchased on the open market for $6.45 per liter, but it must be
purchased in lots of 1,000 liters. You have been asked to determine the relevant cost of 760 liters of the material to be used in a job for a customer. The relevant cost of the 760 liters of material B39U is:
A) $4,902 B) $4,672 C) $4,522 D) $6,450
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Hard Source: CIMA, adapted
Solution:
31. Munafo Corporation is a specialty component manufacturer with idle capacity. Management would like to use its extra capacity to generate additional profits. A potential customer has offered to buy 6,500 units of component VGI. Each unit of VGI requires 1 unit of material I57 and 5 units of material M97. Data concerning these two materials follow:
Material Units in Stock Original Cost Per Unit Current Market Price Per Unit Disposal Value Per Unit I57 ... 2,400 $9.10 $9.40 $8.95 M97 ... 33,960 $4.70 $4.70 $3.50
Material I57 is in use in many of the company's products and is routinely replenished. Material M97 is no longer used by the company in any of its normal products and existing stocks would not be replenished once they are used up.
What would be the relevant cost of the materials, in total, for purposes of determining a minimum acceptable price for the order for product VGI?
A) $174,850 B) $213,130 C) $213,850 D) $171,925
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Hard Source: CIMA, adapted
Solution: Material # Required per unit Relevant price Total I57 ... 1 × $9.40 = $ 9.40 M97 ... 5 × $3.50 = 17.50 Total per unit relevant cost ... $26.90 Minimum acceptable price for 6,500 units of VGI = $26.90 per unit × 6,500 units = $174,850
32. Winder Corporation is a specialty component manufacturer with idle capacity. Management would like to use its extra capacity to generate additional profits. A potential customer has offered to buy 3,000 units of component QEA. Each unit of QEA requires 5 units of material F85 and 5 units of material E71. Data concerning these two materials follow:
Material Units in Stock Original Cost Per Unit Current Market Price Per Unit Disposal Value Per Unit F85 ... 740 $4.90 $4.75 $4.20 E71 ... 13,680 $5.00 $4.70 $3.60
Material F85 is in use in many of the company's products and is routinely replenished. Material E71 is no longer used by the company in any of its normal products and existing stocks would not be replenished once they are used up.
What would be the relevant cost of the materials, in total, for purposes of determining a minimum acceptable price for the order for product QEA?
A) $126,702 B) $141,750 C) $126,295 D) $145,965
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 1 Level: Hard Source: CIMA, adapted
Solution:
Total needed Inventory
# of units to purchase on
market
Relevant
price Total cost F85 ... (3,000 × 5) = 15,000 15,000 $4.75 $ 71,250 E71 ... (3,000 × 5) = 15,000 (15,000 − 13,680) = 1,320 $4.70 6,204 13,680 $3.60 49,248
33. Rice Corporation currently operates two divisions which had operating results last year as follows: West Troy Division Division Sales ... $600,000 $300,000 Variable costs ... 310,000 200,000 Contribution margin ... 290,000 100,000 Traceable fixed costs ... 110,000 70,000 Allocated common corporate costs ... 90,000 45,000 Net operating income (loss) ... $ 90,000 ($ 15,000)
Since the Troy Division also sustained an operating loss in the prior year, Rice's president is considering the elimination of this division. Troy Division's traceable fixed costs could be avoided if the division were eliminated. The total common corporate costs would be unaffected by the decision. If the Troy Division had been eliminated at the beginning of last year, Rice Corporation's operating income for last year would have been:
A) $15,000 higher B) $30,000 lower C) $45,000 lower D) $60,000 higher
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking
AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 2 Level: Medium Source: CPA, adapted
Solution: Troy Division:
Contribution margin ... $100,000 Less: traceable fixed costs ... 70,000 Segment margin of Troy Division ... $ 30,000 Rice Corporation’s operating income would have been $30,000 less without the segment margin contributed by the Troy Division.
34. Beaver Company (a multi-product firm) produces 5,000 units of Product X each year. Each unit of Product X sells for $8 and has a contribution margin of $5. If Product X is discontinued, $18,000 of fixed overhead would be eliminated. As a result of discontinuing Product X, the company's overall operating income would: A) decrease by $25,000
B) increase by $43,000 C) decrease by $7,000 D) increase by $7,000
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 2 Level: Medium Solution:
Fixed overhead savings if Product X is eliminated ... $18,000 Less: contribution margin lost if Product X is
discontinued ($5 × 5,000) ... 25,000 Decrease in overall operating income if Product X is
eliminated ... ($ 7,000) 35. Milli Company plans to discontinue a division that generates a total contribution
margin of $20,000 per year. Fixed overhead associated with this division is $50,000, of which $5,000 cannot be eliminated. The effect of this discontinuance on Milli's operating income would be an increase of:
A) $5,000 B) $20,000 C) $25,000 D) $30,000
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking
AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 2 Level: Medium Source: CPA, adapted
Solution:
Fixed overhead savings if division is discontinued ... $45,000 Less: contribution margin lost if division is eliminated .... 20,000 Increase in operating income if division is eliminated ... $25,000
36. ABD Realty manages five apartment complexes in its region. Shown below are summary income statements for each apartment complex:
U V W X Y
Rental income ... $1,000 $1,210 $2,347 $1,878 $1,065 Expenses ... 800 1,300 2,600 2,400 1,300 Operating income ... $ 200 ($ 90) ($ 253) ($ 522) ($ 235) Included in the expenses is $1,200 of common corporate expenses that have been
allocated to the apartment complexes based on rental income. These common corporate expenses would have to be incurred regardless of how many apartment complexes ABD Realty manages. The apartment complex(es) that ABD Realty should consider dropping is (are):
A) V, W, X, Y B) W, X, Y C) X, Y D) X
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 2 Level: Hard Source: CMA, adapted
Solution:
Total rental income = $1,000 + $1,210 + $2,347 + $1,878 + $1,065 = $7,500
U V W X Y
Rental income ... $1,000 $1,210 $2,347 $1,878 $1,065 Less expenses ... 800 1,300 2,600 2,400 1,300 Add back proportional
share of common expenses [(Rental income in each column ÷ Total rental income of $7,500) × $1,200]* 160 194 376 300 170 Apartment complex
37. The following information relates to next year's projected operating results of the Children's Division of Grunge Clothing Corporation:
Contribution margin ... $200,000 Fixed expenses ... 500,000 Net operating loss ... ($300,000)
If Children's Division is dropped, half of the fixed costs above can be eliminated. What will be the effect on Grunge's profit next year if Children's Division is dropped instead of being kept?
A) $50,000 increase B) $250,000 increase C) $250,000 decrease D) $550,000 increase
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 2 Level: Medium Solution: Keep the Division Drop the Division Difference Contribution margin ... $200,000 $ 0 ($200,000) Fixed expenses ... 500,000 250,000 250,000 Net operating income (loss) ... ($300,000) ($250,000) ($ 50,000) Net operating income would increase by $50,000 if the Children’s Division were dropped. Therefore, the division should be dropped.
38. The management of Furrow Corporation is considering dropping product L07E. Data from the company's accounting system appear below:
Sales ... $830,000 Variable expenses ... $365,000 Fixed manufacturing expenses ... $291,000 Fixed selling and administrative expenses ... $166,000
In the company's accounting system all fixed expenses of the company are fully allocated to products. Further investigation has revealed that $186,000 of the fixed manufacturing expenses and $106,000 of the fixed selling and administrative expenses are avoidable if product L07E is discontinued. What would be the effect on the
company's overall net operating income if product L07E were dropped? A) Overall net operating income would increase by $8,000.
B) Overall net operating income would decrease by $173,000. C) Overall net operating income would decrease by $8,000. D) Overall net operating income would increase by $173,000.
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 2 Level: Easy Solution: Keep the Product Drop the Product Difference Sales ... $830,000 $ 0 ($830,000) Variable expenses ... 365,000 0 365,000 Contribution margin ... 465,000 0 (465,000) Fixed expenses:
Fixed manufacturing expenses ... 291,000 *105,000 186,000 Fixed selling and administrative
expenses... 166,000 **60,000 106,000 Total fixed expenses ... 457,000 165,000 292,000 Net operating income (loss) ... $ 8,000 ($165,000) ($173,000) Net operating income would decline by $173,000 if product L07E were dropped. Therefore, the product should not be dropped.
39. Product U23N has been considered a drag on profits at Jinkerson Corporation for some time and management is considering discontinuing the product altogether. Data from the company's accounting system appear below:
Sales ... $730,000 Variable expenses ... $350,000 Fixed manufacturing expenses ... $234,000 Fixed selling and administrative expenses ... $161,000
In the company's accounting system all fixed expenses of the company are fully allocated to products. Further investigation has revealed that $144,000 of the fixed manufacturing expenses and $93,000 of the fixed selling and administrative expenses are avoidable if product U23N is discontinued. What would be the effect on the company's overall net operating income if product U23N were dropped?
A) Overall net operating income would increase by $15,000. B) Overall net operating income would increase by $143,000. C) Overall net operating income would decrease by $143,000. D) Overall net operating income would decrease by $15,000.
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 2 Level: Easy Solution: Keep the Product Drop the Product Difference Sales ... $730,000 $ 0 ($730,000) Variable expenses ... 350,000 0 350,000 Contribution margin ... 380,000 0 ( 380,000) Fixed expenses:
Fixed manufacturing expenses ... 234,000 *90,000 144,000 Fixed selling and administrative
expenses ... 161,000 **68,000 93,000 Total fixed expenses ... 395,000 158,000 237,000 Net operating income (loss) ... ($ 15,000) ($ 158,000) ($143,000) Net operating income would decline by $143,000 if product U23N were dropped. Therefore, the product should not be dropped.
40. Supler Company produces a part used in the manufacture of one of its products. The unit product cost is $18, computed as follows:
Direct materials ... $ 8
Direct labor ... 4
Variable manufacturing overhead ... 1
Fixed manufacturing overhead ... 5
Unit product cost ... $18
An outside supplier has offered to provide the annual requirement of 4,000 of the parts for only $14 each. It is estimated that 60 percent of the fixed overhead cost above could be eliminated if the parts are purchased from the outside supplier. Based on these data, the per-unit dollar advantage or disadvantage of purchasing from the outside supplier would be: A) $1 disadvantage B) $1 advantage C) $2 advantage D) $4 disadvantage Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium Solution: Relevant cost per unit: Direct materials ... $ 8
Direct labor ... 4
Variable manufacturing overhead ... 1
Fixed manufacturing overhead ($5 × 0.60) ... 3
Relevant manufacturing cost ... $16
Net advantage (disadvantage): Relevant manufacturing cost savings ... $16
Less: cost from outside supplier ... 14
41. Sharp Company produces 8,000 parts each year, which are used in the production of one of its products. The unit product cost of a part is $36, computed as follows:
Variable production costs ... $16 Fixed production costs ... 20 Unit product cost ... $36
The parts can be purchased from an outside supplier for only $28 each. The space in which the parts are now produced would be idle and fixed production costs would be reduced by one-fourth. If the parts are purchased from the outside supplier, the annual impact on the company's operating income will be:
A) $24,000 increase B) $24,000 decrease C) $56,000 increase D) $56,000 decrease
Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium Solution:
Relevant cost per unit:
Variable production costs ... $16 Fixed manufacturing overhead ($20 × 0.25) ... 5 Relevant manufacturing cost ... $21
Relevant manufacturing cost savings ($21 × 8,000) ... $168,000 Less: cost to purchase from outside supplier ($28 × 8,000) . 224,000 Net disadvantage of purchasing from outside supplier ... ($ 56,000)
42. Motor Company manufactures 10,000 units of Part M-l each year for use in its production. The following total costs were reported last year:
Direct materials ... $ 20,000 Direct labor ... 55,000 Variable manufacturing overhead ... 45,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead ... 70,000 Total manufacturing cost ... $190,000
Valve Company has offered to sell Motor 10,000 units of Part M-l for $18 per unit. If Motor accepts the offer, some of the facilities presently used to manufacture Part M-l could be rented to a third party at an annual rental of $15,000. Additionally, $4 per unit of the fixed overhead applied to Part M-l would be totally eliminated. Should Motor Company accept Valve Company's offer, and why?
A) No, because it would be $5,000 cheaper to make the part. B) Yes, because it would be $10,000 cheaper to buy the part. C) No, because it would be $15,000 cheaper to make the part. D) Yes, because it would be $25,000 cheaper to buy the part.
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Hard Source: CPA, adapted
Solution:
Relevant cost of manufacturing:
Direct materials ... $ 20,000 Direct labor ... 55,000 Variable manufacturing overhead ... 45,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead ($4 × 10,000) ... 40,000 Relevant manufacturing cost ... $160,000 Net advantage (disadvantage):
Relevant manufacturing cost savings ... $160,000 Annual rental of manufacturing facilities
43. Kingston Company needs 10,000 units of a certain part to be used in its production cycle. The following information is available concerning Kingston's unit product cost:
Direct materials ... $ 6
Direct labor ... 24
Variable manufacturing overhead ... 12
Fixed manufacturing overhead ... 15
Unit product cost ... $57
Utica Company has offered to supply Kingston's entire annual requirements of the part for $53 each. If Kingston buys the part from Utica instead of making it, Kingston would have no other use for the facilities and 60 percent of the fixed manufacturing overhead would continue. In deciding whether to make or buy the part, the total relevant costs to make the part internally are: A) $342,000 B) $480,000 C) $530,000 D) $570,000 Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium Source: CPA, adapted Solution: Relevant cost per unit: Direct materials ... $ 6
Direct labor ... 24
Variable manufacturing overhead ... 12
Fixed manufacturing overhead ($15 × 0.40) ... 6
Relevant manufacturing cost ... $48
44. The following standard costs pertain to a component part manufactured by Bor Company: Direct materials ... $ 4 Direct labor ... 10 Manufacturing overhead ... 40 Standard cost per unit ... $54
An outside supplier has offered to supply all of the parts needed by Bor Company for $50 each. The 60% of the manufacturing overhead cost that is fixed would be
unaffected by this decision. In the decision to “make or buy,” what is the relevant unit cost to make the part internally?
A) $54 B) $38 C) $30 D) $5
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking
AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium Source: CPA, adapted
Solution:
Relevant cost per unit:
Direct materials ... $ 4 Direct labor ... 10 Manufacturing overhead ($40 × 0.40) ... 16 Relevant manufacturing cost ... $30
45. Gordon Company produces 1,000 units of a part per year which are used in the assembly of one of its products. The unit cost of producing these parts is:
Variable manufacturing cost ... $15 Fixed manufacturing cost ... 12 Total manufacturing cost ... $27
The part can be purchased from an outside supplier at $20 per unit. If the part is purchased from the outside supplier, two thirds of the total fixed costs incurred in producing the part can be eliminated. The annual increase or decrease on the
company's operating incomes as a result of buying the part from the outside supplier would be: A) $3,000 increase B) $1,000 decrease C) $7,000 increase D) $5,000 decrease
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium Solution:
Relevant cost per unit:
Variable production costs ... $15 Fixed manufacturing overhead ($12 × 2/3) ... 8 Relevant manufacturing cost ... $23 Net advantage (disadvantage) per unit:
Manufacturing cost savings ... $23 Cost of purchasing the part ... 20 Net advantage (disadvantage) ... $ 3 Total = $3 × 1,000 units = $3000 increase
46. Quikcook Microwave Company currently manufactures the doors that it uses for its microwave ovens. The annual costs to manufacture the 40,000 doors needed each year are as follows:
Total Cost
Direct material ... $200,000 Direct labor ... 40,000 Variable manufacturing overhead .... 80,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead ... 320,000 Total ... $640,000
Delilah Glass Corporation has offered to provide Quikcook with all of its annual door needs for $14 per door. If Quikcook accepts this offer, only 40% of the fixed overhead above could be totally eliminated. Also, Quikcook has no alternative use for the idle facilities if the decision was made to go with Delilah's offer. Based on this
information, would Quikcook be better off to make the doors or buy the doors and by how much? A) $48,000 better to buy B) $48,000 better to make C) $112,000 better to buy D) $112,000 better to make
Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium Solution:
Relevant cost:
Direct materials ... $200,000 Direct labor ... 40,000 Variable manufacturing overhead ... 80,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead ($320,000 × 0.40) .. 128,000 Relevant manufacturing cost ... $448,000 Net advantage (disadvantage):
Manufacturing cost savings ... $448,000 Cost of purchasing the part ($14 × 40,000) ... ( 560,000)
47. Sardi Inc. is considering whether to continue to make a component or to buy it from an outside supplier. The company uses 17,000 of the components each year. The unit product cost of the component according to the company's cost accounting system is given as follows:
Direct materials ... $ 8.20 Direct labor ... 8.30 Variable manufacturing overhead ... 1.20 Fixed manufacturing overhead ... 4.30 Unit product cost ... $22.00
Assume that direct labor is a variable cost. Of the fixed manufacturing overhead, 70% is avoidable if the component were bought from the outside supplier. In addition, making the component uses 2 minutes on the machine that is the company's current constraint. If the component were bought, this machine time would be freed up for use on another product that requires 4 minutes on the constraining machine and that has a contribution margin of $7.00 per unit.
When deciding whether to make or buy the component, what cost of making the component should be compared to the price of buying the component?
A) $24.21 B) $25.50 C) $20.71 D) $22.00
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Hard Source: CIMA, adapted
Solution:
Relevant cost per unit:
Direct materials ... $ 8.20 Direct labor ... 8.30 Variable manufacturing overhead ... 1.20 Fixed manufacturing overhead ($4.30 × 0.70) ... 3.01 Relevant manufacturing cost ... $20.71 Add contribution margin lost* ... 3.50
48. Part S51 is used in one of Haberkorn Corporation's products. The company makes 12,000 units of this part each year. The company's Accounting Department reports the following costs of producing the part at this level of activity:
Per Unit Direct materials ... $6.30 Direct labor ... $5.70 Variable manufacturing overhead ... $4.80 Supervisor’s salary ... $7.00 Depreciation of special equipment ... $8.60 Allocated general overhead ... $7.20
An outside supplier has offered to produce this part and sell it to the company for $37.70 each. If this offer is accepted, the supervisor's salary and all of the variable costs, including direct labor, can be avoided. The special equipment used to make the part was purchased many years ago and has no salvage value or other use. The
allocated general overhead represents fixed costs of the entire company. If the outside supplier's offer were accepted, only $17,000 of these allocated general overhead costs would be avoided.
If management decides to buy part S51 from the outside supplier rather than to continue making the part, what would be the annual impact on the company's overall net operating income?
A) Net operating income would decline by $5,800 per year. B) Net operating income would decline by $22,800 per year. C) Net operating income would decline by $149,800 per year. D) Net operating income would decline by $39,800 per year.
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Easy
Solution:
Make Buy Direct materials (12,000 units @ $6.30 per unit) ... $ 75,600
Direct labor (12,000 units @ $5.70 per unit) ... 68,400 Variable overhead (12,000 units @ $4.80 per unit) . 57,600 Supervisor’s salary (12,000 units @ $7.00 per unit) 84,000 Depreciation of special equipment (not relevant) .... 0 Allocated general overhead (avoidable only) ... 17,000 Outside purchase price (12,000 units @ $37.70 per
unit) ... $452,400 Total cost ... $302,600 $452,400 The total cost of the make alternative is lower by $149,800 ($302,600 − $452,400). Thus, net operating income would decline by $149,800 if the offer from the supplier were accepted. Therefore, the company should continue to make the part itself.
49. Norgaard Corporation makes 8,000 units of part G25 each year. This part is used in one of the company's products. The company's Accounting Department reports the following costs of producing the part at this level of activity:
Per Unit Direct materials... $6.70 Direct labor ... $8.10 Variable manufacturing overhead ... $1.10 Supervisor’s salary ... $2.00 Depreciation of special equipment ... $4.20 Allocated general overhead ... $2.10
An outside supplier has offered to make and sell the part to the company for $21.20 each. If this offer is accepted, the supervisor's salary and all of the variable costs, including direct labor, can be avoided. The special equipment used to make the part was purchased many years ago and has no salvage value or other use. The allocated general overhead represents fixed costs of the entire company. If the outside supplier's offer were accepted, only $2,000 of these allocated general overhead costs would be avoided. In addition, the space used to produce part G25 would be used to make more of one of the company's other products, generating an additional segment margin of $16,000 per year for that product.
What would be the impact on the company's overall net operating income of buying part G25 from the outside supplier?
A) Net operating income would decline by $8,400 per year. B) Net operating income would increase by $16,000 per year. C) Net operating income would decline by $8,000 per year. D) Net operating income would decline by $40,000 per year.
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium
Solution:
Make Buy Direct materials (8,000 units @ $6.70 per unit) ... $ 53,600
Direct labor (8,000 units @ $8.10 per unit) ... 64,800 Variable overhead (8,000 units @ $1.10 per unit) ... 8,800 Supervisor’s salary (8,000 units @ $2.00 per unit) .. 16,000 Depreciation of special equipment (not relevant) .... 0 Allocated general overhead (avoidable only) ... 2,000 Outside purchase price (8,000 units @ $21.20 per
unit) ... $169,600 Opportunity cost ... ( 16,000) Total cost ... $145,200 $153,600 The total cost of the make alternative is lower by $8,400 ($145,200 − $153,600). Thus, net operating income would decline by $8,400 if the offer from the supplier were accepted. Therefore, the company should continue to make the part itself.
50. Rebelo Corporation is presently making part E07 that is used in one of its products. A total of 17,000 units of this part are produced and used every year. The company's Accounting Department reports the following costs of producing the part at this level of activity:
Per Unit Direct materials ... $3.80 Direct labor ... $3.80 Variable manufacturing overhead ... $1.10 Supervisor’s salary ... $2.50 Depreciation of special equipment ... $1.40 Allocated general overhead ... $8.60
An outside supplier has offered to make and sell the part to the company for $20.80 each. If this offer is accepted, the supervisor's salary and all of the variable costs can be avoided. The special equipment used to make the part was purchased many years ago and has no salvage value or other use. The allocated general overhead represents fixed costs of the entire company, none of which would be avoided if the part were purchased instead of produced internally. If management decides to buy part E07 from the outside supplier rather than to continue making the part, what would be the annual impact on the company's overall net operating income?
A) Net operating income would decline by $6,800 per year. B) Net operating income would decline by $163,200 per year. C) Net operating income would increase by $163,200 per year. D) Net operating income would increase by $6,800 per year.
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Easy
Solution:
Make Buy Direct materials (17,000 units @ $3.80 per unit) ... $ 64,600
Direct labor (17,000 units @ $3.80 per unit) ... 64,600 Variable overhead (17,000 units @ $1.10 per unit) ... 18,700 Supervisor’s salary (17,000 units @ $2.50 per unit) .. 42,500 Depreciation of special equipment (not relevant) ... 0 Allocated general overhead (not relevant) ... 0 Outside purchase price (17,000 units @ $20.80 per
unit) ... $353,600 Total cost ... $190,400 $353,600 The total cost of the make alternative is lower by $163,200 ($353,600 − $190,400). Thus, net operating income would decline by $163,200 if the offer from the supplier were accepted. Therefore, the company should continue to make the part itself.
51. Part U16 is used by Mcvean Corporation to make one of its products. A total of
13,000 units of this part are produced and used every year. The company's Accounting Department reports the following costs of producing the part at this level of activity:
Per Unit Direct materials ... $2.90 Direct labor ... $7.50 Variable manufacturing overhead ... $8.00 Supervisor’s salary ... $3.40 Depreciation of special equipment ... $1.80 Allocated general overhead ... $7.00
An outside supplier has offered to make the part and sell it to the company for $29.80 each. If this offer is accepted, the supervisor's salary and all of the variable costs, including the direct labor, can be avoided. The special equipment used to make the part was purchased many years ago and has no salvage value or other use. The
allocated general overhead represents fixed costs of the entire company, none of which would be avoided if the part were purchased instead of produced internally. In
addition, the space used to make part U16 could be used to make more of one of the company's other products, generating an additional segment margin of $25,000 per year for that product. What would be the impact on the company's overall net operating income of buying part U16 from the outside supplier?
A) Net operating income would increase by $25,000 per year. B) Net operating income would decline by $79,000 per year. C) Net operating income would decline by $35,400 per year. D) Net operating income would increase by $14,600 per year.
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium
Solution:
Make Buy Direct materials (13,000 units @ $2.90 per unit) ... $ 37,700
Direct labor (13,000 units @ $7.50 per unit) ... 97,500 Variable overhead (13,000 units @ $8.00 per unit) . 104,000 Supervisor’s salary (13,000 units @ $3.40 per unit) 44,200 Depreciation of special equipment (not relevant) .... 0 Allocated general overhead (not relevant) ... 0 Outside purchase price (13,000 units @ $29.80 per
unit) ... $387,400 Opportunity cost (segment margin) ... ( 25,000) Total cost ... $283,400 $362,400 The total cost of the make alternative is lower by $79,000 ($283,400 − $362,400). Thus, net operating income would decline by $79,000 if the offer from the supplier were accepted. Therefore, the company should continue to make the part itself. 52. Landor Appliance Company makes and sells electric fans. Each fan regularly sells for
$42. The following cost data per fan is based on a full capacity of 150,000 fans produced each period.
Direct materials ... $8 Direct labor ... $9 Manufacturing overhead
(70% variable and 30% unavoidable fixed) ... $10
A special order has been received by Landor for a sale of 25,000 fans to an overseas customer. The only selling costs that would be incurred on this order would be $4 per fan for shipping. Landor is now selling 120,000 fans through regular channels each period. What should Landor use as a minimum selling price per fan in negotiating a price for this special order?
A) $28 B) $27 C) $31 D) $24
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 4 Level: Medium
Solution:
Direct materials ... $ 8 Direct labor ... 9 Variable manufacturing overhead ($10 × 0.70) 7 Variable selling cost ... 4 Minimum selling price ... $28
53. Ignace Timekeepers, Inc. manufactures and sells wrist watches. Ignace has the capacity to manufacture and sell 20,000 watches each year but is currently only manufacturing and selling 15,000. The following costs relate to annual operations at 15,000 watches:
Total Cost Variable manufacturing cost ... $150,000 Fixed manufacturing cost ... $120,000 Variable selling and administrative cost ... $90,000 Fixed selling and administrative cost ... $180,000
Ignace normally sells its watches for $42 each. A discount chain is interesting in purchasing Ignace's excess capacity of 5,000 watches. This special order would not affect regular sales or the cost structure above. Ignace's profits for the year will increase as long as the price on this special order exceeds:
A) $12.00 B) $13.50 C) $16.00 D) $31.00
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 4 Level: Medium Solution:
Total relevant costs:
Variable manufacturing cost ... $150,000 Variable selling and administrative cost ... 90,000 Total relevant costs ... $240,000
54. Gallerani Corporation has received a request for a special order of 6,000 units of product A90 for $21.20 each. Product A90's unit product cost is $16.20, determined as follows:
Direct materials ... $ 6.10 Direct labor ... 4.20 Variable manufacturing overhead ... 2.30 Fixed manufacturing overhead ... 3.60 Unit product cost ... $16.20
Direct labor is a variable cost. The special order would have no effect on the company's total fixed manufacturing overhead costs. The customer would like
modifications made to product A90 that would increase the variable costs by $4.20 per unit and that would require an investment of $21,000 in special molds that would have no salvage value.
This special order would have no effect on the company's other sales. The company has ample spare capacity for producing the special order. If the special order is accepted, the company's overall net operating income would increase (decrease) by: A) ($18,600) B) ($16,200) C) $30,000 D) $5,400 Answer: D
Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 4 Level: Easy Solution:
Incremental revenue (6,000 units @ $21.20 per unit) ... $127,200 Less incremental costs:
Direct materials (6,000 units @ $6.10 per unit) ... 36,600 Direct labor (6,000 units @ $4.20 per unit) ... 25,200 Variable manufacturing overhead (6,000 units @ $2.30 per unit) 13,800 Modifications (6,000 units @ $4.20 per unit) ... 25,200 Special molds ... 21,000 Total incremental cost ... 121,800 Incremental net operating income ... $ 5,400
55. A customer has requested that Lewelling Corporation fill a special order for 9,000 units of product S47 for $20.50 a unit. While the product would be modified slightly for the special order, product S47's normal unit product cost is $14.40:
Direct materials ... $ 3.10 Direct labor ... 1.50 Variable manufacturing overhead ... 6.40 Fixed manufacturing overhead ... 3.40 Unit product cost ... $14.40
Direct labor is a variable cost. The special order would have no effect on the company's total fixed manufacturing overhead costs. The customer would like
modifications made to product S47 that would increase the variable costs by $5.00 per unit and that would require an investment of $36,000 in special molds that would have no salvage value.
This special order would have no effect on the company's other sales. The company has ample spare capacity for producing the special order. If the special order is accepted, the company's overall net operating income would increase (decrease) by: A) ($9,900)
B) $4,500 C) $54,900 D) ($26,100)
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 4 Level: Easy Solution:
Incremental revenue (9,000 units @ $20.50 per unit) ... $184,500 Less incremental costs:
Direct materials (9,000 units @ $3.10 per unit) ... 27,900 Direct labor (9,000 units @ $1.50 per unit) ... 13,500 Variable manufacturing overhead (9,000 units @ $6.40 per unit) 57,600 Modifications (9,000 units @ $5.00 per unit) ... 45,000 Special molds ... 36,000 Total incremental cost ... 180,000 Incremental net operating income ... $ 4,500
56. Holden Company produces three products, with costs and selling prices as follows:
Product A Product B Product C
Selling price per unit ... $30 100% $20 100% $15 100% Variable costs per unit ... 18 60% 15 75% 6 40% Contribution margin per unit ... $12 40% $ 5 25% $ 9 60% A particular machine is a bottleneck. On that machine, 3 machine hours are required to
produce each unit of Product A, 1 hour is required to produce each unit of Product B, and 2 hours are required to produce each unit of Product C. In which order should it produce its products?
A) C, A, B B) A, C, B C) B, C, A
D) The order of production doesn't matter.
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 5 Level: Medium Solution:
Product A Product B Product C
Contribution margin per unit ... $12 $5 $9 Machine-hours per unit ... 3 1 2 Contribution margin per hour ... $4.00 $5.00 $4.50
57. Wood Carving Corporation manufactures three products. Because of a recent lack of skilled wood carvers, the corporation has had a shortage of available labor hours. The following per unit data relates to the three products of the corporation:
Letter Openers Elvis Statues Candle Holders Sales price ... $30 $80 $42 Variable costs ... $20 $40 $20 Labor hours required ... 1 6 2
Assume that Wood Carving only has 1,800 labor hours available next month. Also assume that Wood Carving can only sell 800 units of each product in a given month. What is the maximum amount of contribution margin that Wood Carving can generate next month given this labor hour shortage?
A) $12,000 B) $19,000 C) $19,600 D) $19,800
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 5 Level: Hard
Solution:
Demand for wood carvers:
Letter Openers Elvis Statues Candle Holders Labor-hours per unit ... 1 6 2 Monthly demand in units ... 800 800 800 Total hours required ... 800 4,800 1,600 Total time required for all products: 7,200
Optimal production plan:
Letter Openers Elvis Statues Candle Holders Selling price per unit ... $30.00 $80.00 $42.00 Variable cost per unit ... $20.00 $40.00 $20.00 Contribution margin per unit ... $10.00 $40.00 $22.00 Labor-hours per unit ... 1 6 2 Contribution margin per hour ... $10.00 $6.67 $11.00
Rank in terms of profitability ... 2 3 1
Optimal production ... 200 0 800 Total hours available ... 1,800
Less: hours required for 800 Candle Holders (800 × 2) ... 1,600 Hours remaining ... 200 Divided by hours required per Letter Opener ... ÷ 1 Number of Letter Openers to produce ... 200 Maximum contribution margin:
Candle Holders (800 × $22)... $17,600 Letter Openers (200 × $10) ... 2,000 Maximum contribution margin ... $19,600
58. Banfield Corporation makes three products that use compound W, the current constrained resource. Data concerning those products appear below:
VP YI WX
Selling price per unit ... $248.04 $230.66 $505.44 Variable cost per unit ... $190.71 $172.14 $388.80 Centiliters of compound W ... 3.90 3.80 8.10
Rank the products in order of their current profitability from most profitable to least profitable. In other words, rank the products in the order in which they should be emphasized. A) WX, VP, YI B) YI, VP, WX C) WX, YI, VP D) VP, WX, YI
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 5 Level: Easy Solution:
Optimal production plan:
VP YI WX
Selling price per unit ... $248.04 $230.66 $505.44 Variable cost per unit ... 190.71 172.14 388.80 Contribution margin per unit ... $57.33 $58.52 $116.64 Centiliters per unit ... 3.90 3.80 8.10 Contribution margin per centiliter ... $14.70 $15.40 $14.40
59. An automated turning machine is the current constraint at Jordison Corporation. Three products use this constrained resource. Data concerning those products appear below:
LN JQ RQ
Selling price per unit ... $165.88 $313.11 $494.52 Variable cost per unit ... $118.30 $239.61 $381.42 Minutes on the constraint ... 2.60 4.90 7.80
Rank the products in order of their current profitability from most profitable to least profitable. In other words, rank the products in the order in which they should be emphasized. A) LN, JQ, RQ B) RQ, LN, JQ C) RQ, JQ, LN D) JQ, RQ, LN
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 5 Level: Easy Solution:
Optimal production plan:
LN JQ RQ
Selling price per unit ... $165.88 $313.11 $494.52 Variable selling cost per unit ... 118.30 239.61 381.42 Contribution margin per unit ... $47.58 $73.50 $113.10 Machine minutes per unit ... 2.60 4.90 7.80 Contribution margin per minute ... $18.30 $15.00 $14.50
60. The constraint at Rauchwerger Corporation is time on a particular machine. The company makes three products that use this machine. Data concerning those products appear below:
WX KD FS
Selling price per unit ... $192.00 $542.66 $222.84 Variable cost per unit ... $158.72 $420.54 $167.76 Minutes on the constraint ... 3.20 8.60 3.60
Assume that sufficient time is available on the constrained machine to satisfy demand for all but the least profitable product. Up to how much should the company be willing to pay to acquire more of the constrained resource?
A) $33.28 per unit B) $10.40 per minute C) $122.12 per unit D) $15.30 per minute
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 5 Level: Medium Solution:
WX KD FS
Selling price per unit ... $192.00 $542.66 $222.84 Variable cost per unit ... 158.72 420.54 167.76 Contribution margin per unit ... $33.28 $122.12 $55.08 Machine minutes per unit ... 3.20 8.60 3.60 Contribution margin per minute ... $10.40 $14.20 $15.30
Rank in terms of profitability ... 3 2 1 The company should be willing to pay up to the contribution margin per minute for the least profitable job, which is $10.40.
61. The Freed Company produces three products, X, Y, Z, from a single raw material input. Product Y can be sold at the splitoff point for total revenues of $50,000, or it can be processed further at a total cost of $16,000 and then sold for $68,000. Product Y:
A) should be sold at the split-off point, rather than processed further.
B) would increase the company's overall net operating income by $18,000 if processed further and then sold.
C) would increase the company's overall net operating income by $68,000 if processed further and then sold.
D) would increase the company's overall net operating income by $2,000 if processed further and then sold.
Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Easy Solution:
Product Y Sales value after further processing ... $68,000 Costs of further processing ... 16,000 Benefit of further processing ... 52,000 Less: Sales value at split-off point ... 50,000 Net advantage ... $ 2,000
62. Pendall Company manufactures products Dee and Eff from a joint process. Product Dee has been allocated $2,500 of the $20,000 in total joint costs associated with the production of 1,000 units each of Dee and Eff each year. Dee can be sold at the split-off point for $3 per unit, or it can be processed further with additional costs of $1,000 and sold for $5 per unit. If Dee is processed further and sold, the result would be: A) A break-even situation.
B) An additional gain of $1,000 from further processing. C) A loss of $1,000 from further processing.
D) An additional gain of $2,000 from further processing.
Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking
AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Medium Source: CPA, adapted
Solution:
Dee Sales value after further processing ($5 × 1,000) . $5,000 Costs of further processing ... 1,000 Benefit of further processing... 4,000 Less: Sales value at split-off point ($3 × 1,000) ... 3,000 Net advantage ... $1,000
63. Faustina Chemical Company manufactures three chemicals (TX14, NJ35, and KS63) from a joint process. The three chemicals are in industrial grade form at the split-off point. They can either be sold at that point or processed further into premium grade. Costs related to each batch of this chemical process is as follows:
TX14 NJ35 KS63
Sales value at split-off point ... $16,000 $12,000 $5,000 Allocated joint costs ... $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 Sales value after further processing ... $20,000 $18,000 $9,000 Cost of further processing ... $5,000 $3,000 $2,000
For which product(s) above would it be more profitable for Faustina to sell at the split-off point rather than process further?
A) TX14 only B) KS63 only
C) TX14 and KS63 only D) NJ35 and KS63 only
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Hard Solution:
TX14 NJ35 KS63 Sales value after further processing .... $20,000 $18,000 $9,000 Sales value at split-off ... 16,000 12,000 5,000 Incremental revenue ... 4,000 6,000 4,000 Further processing costs ... 5,000 3,000 2,000 Incremental income (loss) ... ($1,000) $ 3,000 $2,000 Product TX14 should be sold at the split-off point without any further processing. Products NJ35 and KS63 should be sold after further processing beyond the split-off point.
64. Khiem, Inc. manufactures baseball gloves that normally sell for $55 each. Khiem currently has 400 defective gloves in inventory that have $35 of materials, labor, and overhead assigned to each glove. The defective gloves can either be completely repaired at a cost of $25 per glove or sold as is at a reduced price of $18 per glove. Khiem would be better off by:
A) $2,000 to sell the gloves at the reduced price. B) $2,800 to sell the gloves at the reduced price.
C) $4,800 to repair the gloves and sell them at the normal price. D) $5,200 to sell the gloves at the reduced price.
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Medium Solution:
Sales value after repairing ($55 × 400) ... $22,000 Sales value at split-off ($18 × 400) ... 7,200 Incremental revenue ... 14,800 Repair costs ($25 × 400) ... 10,000 Incremental income from further processing ... $ 4,800
65. Two products, QI and VH, emerge from a joint process. Product QI has been allocated $9,600 of the total joint costs of $12,000. A total of 9,000 units of product QI are produced from the joint process. Product QI can be sold at the split-off point for $13 per unit, or it can be processed further for an additional total cost of $54,000 and then sold for $18 per unit. If product QI is processed further and sold, what would be the effect on the overall profit of the company compared with sale in its unprocessed form directly after the split-off point?
A) $18,600 less profit B) $108,000 more profit C) $600 more profit D) $9,000 less profit
Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking
AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Medium Source: CIMA, adapted
Solution:
Product QI Sales value after further processing ($18 × 9,000) .... $162,000 Costs of further processing ... 54,000 Benefit of further processing ... 108,000 Less: Sales value at split-off point ($13 × 9,000) ... 117,000 Net advantage (disadvantage) ... ($ 9,000)
66. Two products, UG and BC, emerge from a joint process. Product UG has been allocated $29,400 of the total joint costs of $42,000. A total of 9,000 units of product UG are produced from the joint process. Product UG can be sold at the split-off point for $15 per unit, or it can be processed further for an additional total cost of $63,000 and then sold for $17 per unit. If product UG is processed further and sold, what would be the effect on the overall profit of the company compared with sale in its unprocessed form directly after the split-off point?
A) $74,400 less profit B) $15,600 less profit C) $45,000 less profit D) $90,000 more profit
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking
AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Medium Source: CIMA, adapted
Solution:
Product HG Sales value after further processing ($17 × 9,000) ... $153,000 Costs of further processing ... 63,000 Benefit of further processing ... 90,000 Less: Sales value at split-off point ($15 × 9,000) .... 135,000 Net advantage (disadvantage) ... ($ 45,000)
67. Priddy Corporation processes sugar cane in batches. The company purchases a batch of sugar cane for $62 from farmers and then crushes the cane in the company's plant at the cost of $18. Two intermediate products, cane fiber and cane juice, emerge from the crushing process. The cane fiber can be sold as is for $28 or processed further for $13 to make the end product industrial fiber that is sold for $36. The cane juice can be sold as is for $43 or processed further for $23 to make the end product molasses that is sold for $85. Which of the intermediate products should be processed further?
A) Cane fiber should NOT be processed into industrial fiber; Cane juice should be processed into molasses
B) Cane fiber should be processed into industrial fiber; Cane juice should NOT be processed into molasses
C) Cane fiber should be processed into industrial fiber; Cane juice should be processed into molasses
D) Cane fiber should NOT be processed into industrial fiber; Cane juice should NOT be processed into molasses
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Easy Solution:
Cane Fiber Cane Juice Sales value after further processing ... $36 $85 Costs of further processing ... 13 23 Benefit of further processing... 23 62 Less: Sales value at split-off point ... 28 43 Net advantage (disadvantage) ... ($ 5) $19
68. Vannorman Corporation processes sugar beets in batches. A batch of sugar beets costs $78 to buy from farmers and $18 to crush in the company's plant. Two intermediate products, beet fiber and beet juice, emerge from the crushing process. The beet fiber can be sold as is for $25 or processed further for $16 to make the end product industrial fiber that is sold for $57. The beet juice can be sold as is for $39 or processed further for $22 to make the end product refined sugar that is sold for $84. How much profit (loss) does the company make by processing one batch of sugar beets into the end products industrial fiber and refined sugar?
A) ($134) B) ($32) C) $7 D) $39
Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Easy Solution:
Beet Fiber Beet Juice Sales value after further processing ... $57 $84 Costs of further processing ... 16 22 Benefit of further processing ... 41 62 Less: Sales value at split-off point ... 25 39 Net advantage (disadvantage) ... $16 $23 Revenue:
Industrial fiber ... $57 Refined sugar ... 84
Total revenue ... $141 Less expenses:
Purchase from farmers ... 78 Crushing costs ... 18 Processing fiber further ... 16 Processing juice further ... 22
Total expenses ... 134 Net profit from one batch ... $ 7
69. Stinehelfer Beet Processors, Inc., processes sugar beets in batches. A batch of sugar beets costs $56 to buy from farmers and $13 to crush in the company's plant. Two intermediate products, beet fiber and beet juice, emerge from the crushing process. The beet fiber can be sold as is for $24 or processed further for $12 to make the end product industrial fiber that is sold for $31. The beet juice can be sold as is for $43 or processed further for $29 to make the end product refined sugar that is sold for $91. How much profit (loss) does the company make by processing the intermediate product beet juice into refined sugar rather than selling it as is?
A) $19 B) $6 C) ($50) D) ($16)
Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Decision Making; Reporting LO: 6 Level: Easy Solution:
Beet Juice Sales value after further processing ... $91 Costs of further processing ... 29 Benefit of further processing... 62 Less: Sales value at split-off point ... 43 Net advantage (disadvantage) ... $19