• No results found

Correlation of viable cell counts, metabolic activity of sulphur-oxidizing bacteria and chemical parameters of marine sediments

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Correlation of viable cell counts, metabolic activity of sulphur-oxidizing bacteria and chemical parameters of marine sediments"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

HELGOLANDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN

Hetgol~inder Meeresunters. 49, 223-236 (1995)

J

Correlation of viable cell counts, metabolic activity of

s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g bacteria and chemical parameters of

marine s e d i m e n t s

J. F. Imhoff, A. Schneider & L. Podgorsek

Institut ffir Meereskunde, Abteilung Marine Mikrobiologie;

Dfisternbrooker W e g 20, D-24105 Kiel, Germany

ABSTRACT: Viable counts of aerobic a n d a n a e r o b i c chemotrophic sulphur-oxidizers as well as phototrophic s u l p h u r bacteria were d e t e r m i n e d in s e d i m e n t samples t a k e n from two different areas along the Baltic Sea shore which were k n o w n to regularly develop sulphidic conditions. Depth profiles of bacterial cell counts were correlated with concentration profiles of chloride, sulphate, sulphide, nitrate a n d p h o s p h a t e in the pore water of these sediments a n d with potential activities of nitrate reduction, thiosulphate transformation and s u l p h a t e formation. The data r e v e a l e d a complex multilayered structure within the sediments. Sulphide was released into the water from s e d i m e n t s of b o t h sampling areas, but it was found that light a n d the availability of oxygen significantly r e d u c e d this amount. In the highly reduced s e d i m e n t at Hiddensee, the highest n u m b e r s of phototrophic a n d chemotrophic sulphur-oxidizers were found n e a r the s e d i m e n t surface. Therefore, it was c o n c l u d e d that the c o m b i n e d action of both groups of bacteria most efficiently oxidizes r e d u c e d sulphur compounds in the top layers of the sediments. Nitrate may replace oxygen as final electron acceptor a n d will support oxidation of sulphide, in particular w h e n oxygen and light are limiting.

I N T R O D U C T I O N

T h e i n c r e a s i n g e u t r o p h i c a t i o n of m a r i n e c o a s t a l a r e a s , i n p a r t i c u l a r its c o r r e l a t i o n w i t h i n c r e a s e s of s u l p h i d i c l o c a t i o n s i n m a r i n e b a s i n s a n d c o a s t a l a r e a s , h a s r e n e w e d i n t e r e s t i n r e a c t i o n s of t h e m i c r o b i a l s u l p h u r c y c l e a n d its i m p o r t a n c e for t h e s e e n v i r o n - m e n t s . A c o n s i d e r a b l e p a r t of t h e o r g a n i c m a t t e r i n m a r i n e s e d i m e n t s is m i n e r a l i z e d b y s u l p h a t e - r e d u c i n g b a c t e r i a ( J 6 r g e n s e n , 1982). I n g e n e r a l , t h e s e b a c t e r i a h a v e a s e l e c t i v e a d v a n t a g e o v e r m e t h a n o g e n i c b a c t e r i a i n t h e m a r i n e e n v i r o n m e n t . T h e m e t h a n o g e n s c a n c o m p e t e o n l y w h e n s u l p h a t e is l i m i t i n g , w h e n o r g a n i c s u h s t r a t e s a r e s u p p l i e d i n e x c e s s or w h e n a l t e r n a t i v e n o n - c o m p e t i t i v e s u b s t r a t e s , l i k e m e t h y l a m i n e , a r e a v a i l a b l e ( W i d d e l , 1988). S u l p h a t e r e d u c t i o n l e a d s to t h e p r o d u c t i o n of s u l p h i d e , w h i c h is t o x i c to b a c t e r i a , a n i m a l s a n d p l a n t s . S u l p h i d e is r e l e a s e d f r o m s e d i m e n t s i n t o t h e s u p e r n a t a n t w a t e r a n d a l s o i n t o t h e a t m o s p h e r e f r o m c o a s t a l a r e a s l i k e t h e W a d d e n S e a a n d t h e s h a l l o w a r e a s of t h e B a l t i c S e a s h o r e .

M o s t of t h e s u l p h i d e p r o d u c e d i n m a r i n e s e d i m e n t s is s u p p o s e d to b e o x i d i z e d b y b a c t e r i a l a c t i v i t y r a t h e r t h a n c h e m i c a l l y . I m p o r t a n t i n t e r m e d i a t e s i n t h e o x i d a t i o n of s u l p h i d e a r e e l e m e n t a l s u l p h u r a n d t h i o s u l p h a t e ( J S r g e n s e n & B a k , 1991). T h e l a t t e r a l s o i s o n e of t h e m o s t c o n v e n i e n t s o u r c e s of r e d u c e d s u l p h u r for t h e c u l t i v a t i o n of b a c t e r i a

(2)

224 J. F. Imhoff, A. S c h n e i d e r & L. P o d g o r s e k

that oxidize r e d u c e d s u l p h u r c o m p o u n d s . A l t h o u g h t h r e e m a j o r p h y s i o l o g i c a l groups of b a c t e r i a with such activities are k n o w n - the a e r o b i c s u l p h u r - o x i d i z e r s , the nitrate- r e d u c i n g sulphur-oxidizers, a n d t h e p h o t o t r o p h i c s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a - only a s m a l l n u m b e r of species of t h e s e b a c t e r i a h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d from the m a r i n e e n v i r o n m e n t . Informa- tion on their distribution a n d f r e q u e n c y in m a r i n e habitats is rare. T h e p r e s e n t study was initiated in o r d e r to correlate v i a b l e n u m b e r s of b a c t e r i a p a r t i c i p a t i n g in the b a c t e r i a l sulphur cycle w i t h c h e m i c a l p a r a m e t e r s from t h e s e d i m e n t s a n d to l o c a t e b a c t e r i a a n d their activities within the s e d i m e n t layers.

M A T E R I A L A N D M E T H O D S

T h e s a m p l i n g s i t e s : T w o s a m p l i n g sites that w e r e k n o w n to d e v e l o p r e g u - larly sulphidic conditions w e r e s e l e c t e d for our analyses. T h e first site, close to the Island of H i d d e n s e e , r e p r e s e n t s an o p e n r e e d b e l t w i t h highly r e d u c e d s e d i m e n t , w h i c h has a l r e a d y b e e n d e s c r i b e d by S u c k o w (1966). T h e s a m p l i n g o c c u r r e d during a t i m e of highly fluctuating w a t e r levels (from 0 - 2 0 cm) a b o v e the s e d i m e n t . T h e other site is l o c a t e d n e a r F6hrdorf, close to Poel, a n d m a y b e d e s c r i b e d as a small, n e a r l y closed r e e d bight. During the s a m p l i n g period, it a p p e a r e d o x i d i z e d at the surface, b u t w a s r e d u c e d at d e e p e r levels. At that t i m e the w e a t h e r w a s c a l m a n d t h e r e w a s a constant w a t e r l e v e l a b o v e the s e d i m e n t of 1-5 cm. T h e structure of the s e d i m e n t n e a r F6hrdorf w a s m o r e h o m o g e n e o u s a n d c o n s i s t e d of a s m a l l e r g r a i n size t h a n that of H i d d e n s e e .

S a m p l i n g o f s e d i m e n t s : T h e s a m p l i n g o c c u r r e d during J u n e 1992. Sedi- m e n t cores w e r e directly cut into discs of 1 to 5 cm thickness, as n o t e d in T a b l e s 1 a n d 2. C o r r e l a t i o n of the different p a r a m e t e r s r e q u i r e d an i m m e d i a t e t r e a t m e n t of the discs a c c o r d i n g to the m e t h o d s listed below. T h e r e f o r e , a n d b e c a u s e of the g r e a t n u m b e r of s i m u l t a n e o u s a n a l y s e s a n d e x p e r i m e n t s , statistical t r e a t m e n t of the s e d i m e n t cores was not possible. H o w e v e r , c o r r e s p o n d i n g disks from 3 - 5 s e d i m e n t cores t a k e n f r o m the s a m e location w e r e c o m b i n e d , carefully m i x e d a n d u s e d for further t r e a t m e n t s .

C h e m i c a 1 a n a 1 y s e s : Pore w a t e r from the s e d i m e n t discs was r e c o v e r e d after c e n t r i f u g a t i o n a n d sterilized by filtration (0.45 ~m pore size cellulose a c e t a t e m e m b r a n e filters). This w a t e r was u s e d to d e t e r m i n e c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of chloride, s u l p h a t e , nitrate a n d p h o s p h a t e . S e p a r a t i o n a n d q u a n t i f i c a t i o n of t h e s e anions was a c h i e v e d by ion c h r o m a t o g r a p h y u s i n g a D i o n e x DX 300, e q u i p p e d w i t h conductivity- a n d U V - d e t e c t o r s a n d an a n i o n e x c h a n g e column (Dionex*AS4A). C h e m i c a l a n a l y s e s w e r e m a d e at t h r e e different sensitivity r a n g e s of the c o n d u c t i v i t y detector. T h e salinity w a s c a l c u l a t e d from the c o n c e n t r a t i o n of chloride (salinity = 1.80655 chlorinity) a c c o r d i n g to W o o s t e r et al. (1969).

(3)

V i a b l e cells, s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g bacteria, c h e m i c a l p a r a m e t e r s 225 a l l o w e d to s t a n d for at least 30 min. After colour d e v e l o p m e n t w a s c o m p l e t e d , the s a m p l e v o l u m e w a s a d j u s t e d to a total of 20 ml a n d the optical density m e a s u r e d at 668 nm a g a i n s t a r e a g e n t blank.

B a c t e r i a 1 a n a 1 y s e s : In order to o v e r c o m e s m a l l - s c a l e h e t e r o g e n e i t y of the sediments, c o r r e s p o n d i n g s e d i m e n t discs of 3 - 5 cores from e a c h s a m p l i n g sites w e r e h o m o g e n o u s l y mixed, and v o l u m e s of 0.5 cm 3 s e d i m e n t w e r e u s e d for dilution series. T h e dilution w a s p e r f o r m e d in 70 % filter-sterilized, n a t u r a l s e a w a t e r (taken from the North S e a n e a r List/Sylt). From t h e s e dilution series, various m e d i a w e r e i n o c u l a t e d . T h e m a t e r i a l was e i t h e r s p r e a d on plates (for a e r o b i c bacteria) or i n o c u l a t e d in d e e p - a g a r (for a n a e r o b i c bacteria).

P h o t o t r o p h i c b a c t e r i a w e r e c u l t i v a t e d in P f e n n i g ' s m e d i u m , s u p p l e m e n t e d with a c e t a t e solution (1 ml/100 ml) a n d salt solution (5 ml/100 ml) a c c o r d i n g to P f e n n i g & Tr~iper (1992). Cell counts w e r e o b t a i n e d from dilution series in agar.

A n e w m e d i u m ("Lith" m e d i u m ) w a s d e s i g n e d for m a r i n e a n a e r o b i c sulphur- oxidizing bacteria, using different e l e c t r o n acceptors. T h e composition of the basic m i x t u r e of the m e d i u m c o n t a i n e d in final a m o u n t s p e r litre: 700 ml of a modified, s u l p h a t e - f r e e s e a w a t e r (MSM), 1.68 g N a H C O 3 , 0.68 g KH2PO4, 0.25 g NH4C1, 1 ml trace e l e m e n t solution SLB (modified SLA with only 1 m g N a 2 S e O 3 - 5 H 2 0 p e r litre) a n d 1 ml v i t a m i n solution VA (Imhoff, 1988). T h e modified, s u l f a t e - f r e e sea w a t e r (MSM) was a u t o c l a v e d s e p a r a t e l y and c o n t a i n e d the f o l l o w i n g a m o u n t s p e r litre: 27.3 g NaC1, 2.7 g MgC12 - 6 H20, 0.75 g KC1, 0.4 g CaC12 . 2 H 2 0 , a n d 0.14 g KBr. T h e p H w a s a d j u s t e d to 7.2. A m i x t u r e of Na2S203 " 5 H20, Na2S . 9 H 2 0 a n d p o l y s u l p h i d e ( p r e p a r e d a c c o r d i n g to F e h e r & Laue, 1956) was a p p l i e d as a source of r e d u c e d s u l p h u r in final c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of 5 mM, 0.5 m M a n d 13 raM, respectively. N a H C O 3 a n d s o d i u m a c e t a t e (5 mM) w e r e a d d e d as the only carbon sources. Either KNO3 (10 mM) or Na2SO4 (10 mM) s e r v e d as e l e c t r o n acceptors.

A e r o b i c b a c t e r i a w e r e c o u n t e d on a g a r p l a t e s u s i n g a m i n e r a l salts m e d i u m ("Thio" medium). T h e basic m e d i u m c o n t a i n e d 700 ml n a t u r a l sea water, 0.4 g NH4C1 a n d 0.5 g KH2PO4. N a H C O 3 (1.0 g/l) and sodium a c e t a t e (5 mM) w e r e a d d e d as c a r b o n sources, a n d s o d i u m t h i o s u l p h a t e (3.2 raM) and Na2 S - 9 H 2 0 (0.5 mM) as sulphur sources and electron donors. T h e p H was a d j u s t e d to 7.2

M e a s u r e m e n t s o f b a c t e r i a l a c t i v i t i e s : T r a n s f o r m a t i o n of thiosulfate was m e a s u r e d u n d e r aerobic conditions in s h a k e n E r l e n m e y e r flasks a n d u n d e r a n a e r o b i c conditions with KNO3 (7 mM) as a d d e d e l e c t r o n acceptor. A n a e r o b i c condi- tions w e r e a c h i e v e d in H u n g a t e t u b e s by r e p e a t e d e v a c u a t i o n a n d flushing w i t h n i t r o g e n gas. Assays w e r e p e r f o r m e d u n d e r n i t r o g e n a n d in the dark. For all activity m e a s u r e - ments, the b a s a l m e d i u m for a n a e r o b i c b a c t e r i a w a s s u p p l e m e n t e d with s o d i u m a c e t a t e (5 raM) a n d Na2S203 9 5 H 2 0 t5 mM). T h e assays w e r e started by the a d d i t i o n of the s e d i m e n t s a m p l e (1 c m 3) to 15 ml of m e d i u m . S u l p h a t e r e d u c t i o n w a s i n h i b i t e d by addition of Na2MoO4 ' 2 H 2 0 (20 mM). S a m p l e s w e r e w i t h d r a w n after 4.5 h of i n c u b a t i o n in the dark at r o o m t e m p e r a t u r e a n d sterilized b y filtration.

(4)

226 J. F. I m h o f f , A. S c h n e i d e r & L. P o d g o r s e k R E S U L T S

In o r d e r to e v a l u a t e t h e r o l e of b a c t e r i a i n v o l v e d i n t h e o x i d a t i o n of r e d u c e d s u l p h u r c o m p o u n d s i n m a r i n e s e d i m e n t s , w e a n a l y s e d t h e t o p 20 c m of s e d i m e n t f r o m t w o d i f f e r e n t s a m p l i n g s i t e s a l o n g t h e c o a s t of t h e B a l t i c S e a . A l t h o u g h t h e s e d i m e n t s f r o m b o t h a r e a s s h o w e d a c t i v e s u l p h a t e r e d u c t i o n a n d r e l e a s e of s u l p h i d e i n t o t h e s u p e r n a t a n t w a t e r , r e m a r k a b l e d i f f e r e n c e s w e r e f o u n d i n t h e d e p t h p r o f i l e s of t h e i r c h e m i c a l c o m p o - s i t i o n a n d i n t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of b a c t e r i a l a c t i v i t i e s . T h e s a m p l i n g s i t e a t H i d d e n s e e o b v i o u s l y w a s c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y t r e m e n d o u s a c t i v i t y of s u l p h a t e - r e d u c i n g b a c t e r i a a n d r e l e a s e of s u l p h i d e i n t o t h e w a t e r ; w h e r e a s s u l p h a t e r e d u c t i o n at t h e s a m p l i n g s i t e n e a r F ~ h r d o r f a p p e a r e d to b e q u i t e low. N e v e r t h e l e s s , s u l p h i d e w a s m e a s u r a b l e i n t h e t h i n w a t e r l a y e r c o v e r i n g t h i s s e d i m e n t .

T h e

s e d i m e n t

a t

H i d d e n s e e

T h e c h e m i c a l c o m p o s i t i o n of t h i s s e d i m e n t is s h o w n i n T a b l e 1. M i n o r s a l i n i t y c h a n g e s , b e t w e e n c a 9 a n d 12 %o, o c c u r r e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e s e d i m e n t . M o s t o b v i o u s l y , t h e s u l p h a t e c o n t e n t of t h e s e d i m e n t w a s s i g n i f i c a n t l y r e d u c e d c o m p a r e d to t h e s u p e r n a t a n t w a t e r . P a r t i c u l a r l y i n d e p t h s b e t w e e n 3 - 8 cm, t h e m i n i m u m v a l u e s of t h e s u l p h a t e / c h l o r i d e r a t i o of 25.1 to 29.3 ( c a l c u l a t e d a s i n d i c a t e d i n T a b l e 1) p o i n t t o a z o n e of c o n t i n u o u s s u l p h a t e d e p l e t i o n b y s u l p h a t e r e d u c t i o n . T h i s z o n e w a s a c c o m p a n i e d b y a m a x i m u m of t h e p h o s p h a t e c o n c e n t r a t i o n . T h e n i t r a t e p o o l w a s a b o u t 2 - 3 o r d e r s of m a g n i t u d e l o w e r t h a n t h e s u l p h a t e p o o l , b u t s h o w e d s i g n i f i c a n t c h a n g e s t h r o u g h o u t t h e s e d i m e n t c o l u m n , w h i c h i n d i c a t e s a c t i v e t u r n o v e r . A c c o r d i n g to t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n g r a -

Table 1. Chemical p a r a m e t e r s of a s e d i m e n t from Hiddensee. Values in brackets w e r e t a k e n from a dialysis pore w a t e r sampler. Parallel m e a s u r e m e n t s by V61kel & Schmidt (pets. comm.) r e v e a l e d c o m p a r a b l e concentrations of sulphide in the sediment. OW = surface water: SN = w a t e r close to

the s e d i m e n t surface

Salinity" Chloride S u l p h a t e S u l p h a t e / Sulphide Nitrate P h o s p h a t e

% mM m M Chloride * * !tM [tM ttM

OW w a t e r 9.88 154.3 7.75 50.2 8 3.4 3.1

SN w a t e r 9.77 152.5 7.64 50.1 70 1.3 13.9

S e d i m e n t

0-1 cm 9.79 152.8 5.75 37.6 [25) 1.4 98.8

1-2 cm 11.07 172.8 5.45 31.5 [25~ 3.4 124.7

2-3 cm 11.46 179.0 5 60 31.3 (47) 20.1 87.7

3-4 cm 11.55 180.3 5.28 29.3 (68) 1.4 188.9

4 - 6 cm 10.85 169.4 4.52 26.7 (104b 10.0 155.0

6-8 cm 10.32 161.2 4.04 25.1 (142) 21.1 72.6

8-10 crn 10.41 162.6 4.93 30.3 (157) 1.6 58.8

10-15 cm 9.91 154.8 5.05 32.6 [4741 10.8 6.7

15-20 cm 10.32 161.1 6.35 39.4 (1150) 4.3 33.6

9 calculated from the chloride c o n c e n t r a t i o n in %o according to Wooster et al. (1969).

(5)

V i a b l e c e l l s , s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g b a c t e r i a , c h e m i c a l p a r a m e t e r s 2 2 7

sediment

depth (cm)

- 7

2

4

6

8 ~

I

12

14

16

1 8 -

20

----r--r

1 0 4

i i

h

i

~ ,

aerobic SOB

--[]-- anaerobic SOB

PSB

105

~ - - [ ' I

106

107

108

i

I I l l l i

viable counts * cm "3 sediment

Fig. 1. V i a b l e c o u n t s of s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g b a c t e r i a at H i d d e n s e e . SOB = S u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g b a c t e r i a , PSB = P u r p l e s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a : V i a b l e c o u n t s of a n a e r o b i c SOB w e r e d e t e r m i n e d u n d e r a n o x i c

(6)

228

sediment

depth

(cm)

0

J. F. I m h o f f , A. S c h n e i d e r & L. P o d g o r s e k

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

_

... : ...

9

[]

2~

S o 4

formation

S 2 0 32- consumption

I I I I

0

2

4

6

8

10

transformation rates

(7)

V i a b l e cells, s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g b a c t e r i a , c h e m i c a l p a r a m e t e r s 229

sediment

depth (cm)

0

I

2 -

4~

~

8 ~

lo I

I

J

12

!

J

14

I

)

P

P

2o F

@ ~ i i : : "

9

[]

S 0 4 2 - formation

---~--S2032-consumption

-/~- NO 3- reduction

I I [ I I

0

2

4

6

8

10

transformation rates

(8)

230 J. F. Imhoff, A. S c h n e i d e r & L. Podgorsek

dients d u r i n g the s a m p l i n g time, it c a n be c o n c l u d e d that the s e d i m e n t is a p p a r e n t l y a source of p h o s p h a t e a n d p r o b a b l y a sink for nitrate. Sulphide was r e l e a s e d from this s e d i m e n t i n significant amounts. Low c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of sulphide could b e d e t e c t e d e v e n in the oxic surface water of this site (Table 1, OW). Laboratory s t u d i e s with n a t u r a l s e d i m e n t cores r e v e a l e d that u n d e r conditions of b l o c k e d o x y g e n transfer a n d in the dark, the c o n c e n t r a t i o n of s u l p h i d e in t h e s u p e r n a t a n t water i n c r e a s e d c o n s i d e r a b l y w i t h i n 12 h. T h e su!phide c o n c e n t r a t i o n a m o u n t e d to 325 uM directly at the s e d i m e n t surface, 220 ~M at 3 cm a b o v e the s e d i m e n t a n d 200 ,ttM at 6 cm. Using t h e s e data, a n e x c h a n g e rate of sulphide b e t w e e n s e d i m e n t a n d w a t e r of 14.4 mmol m -2 s e d i m e n t d -1 was calculated. Thus o x y g e n availability is e x p e c t e d to b e a limiting factor for s u l p h i d e oxidation in the top layers of this s e d i m e n t , at least d u r i n g dark periods.

Aerobic a n d anaerobic, n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g sulphur-oxidizers as well as phototrophic s u l p h u r bacteria h a d m a x i m a of v i a b l e cell n u m b e r s in the top layer of this s e d i m e n t (Fig. 1). N u m b e r s of phototrophic p u r p l e s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a e x c e e d e d those of all others, e v e n those of aerobic sulphur-oxidizers. B e c a u s e of their l i g h t - d e p e n d e n c e , they formed a p i n k to r e d - c o l o u r e d layer in the top millimetres of the sediment, just u n d e r n e a t h a very thin surface layer. Viable counts d e c r e a s e d b y o n e order of m a g n i t u d e i n the s e c o n d (1-2 cm) a n d by two more orders in the third s e d i m e n t disc (2-4 cm). V i a b l e cells of phototrophic g r e e n s u l p h u r bacteria were several orders of m a g n i t u d e lower, ca 2 - 4 . 10 4

cells cm -3 in the top layers of the s e d i m e n t .

Also cell n u m b e r s of c h e m o t r o p h i c sulphur-oxidizers u s i n g o x y g e n or nitrate as electron acceptors were h i g h e s t in the top disc of the sediment. They d r o p p e d b y a b o u t o n e order of m a g n i t u d e b e l o w 2 cm, b u t r e m a i n e d relatively high over the rest of the s e d i m e n t clown to 10-15 cm d e p t h (Fig. 1).

T h e capability to oxidize t h i o s u l p h a t e u n d e r aerobic conditions w a s high in this s e d i m e n t (Fig. 2a). A l t h o u g h s u l p h a t e was the major oxidation product, t r a n s f o r m a t i o n rates of t h i o s u l p h a t e I1.4-6.5 ~tmol h -1 c m -3) w e r e not q u a n t i t a t i v e l y c o r r e l a t e d with the formation of s u l p h a t e (1.1-5.2 amol h - l cm-3}. Obviously, thiosulphate is n o t exclusively oxidized [o sulphate b u t to some e x t e n t t r a n s f o r m e d to other still u n k n o w n products.

U n d e r a n a e r o b i c conditions in the p r e s e n c e of nitrate, t h i o s u l p h a t e t u r n o v e r rates (0.3-5.2 LtmO1 h -1 cm -3) w e r e in the s a m e order as u n d e r aerobic c o n d i t i o n s (Fig. 2b). However, lower a m o u n t s of s u l p h a t e (0.1-0.5 ~mol h -1 cm -3) w e r e formed. Thus. anaerobically, s u l p h a t e was a m m o r oxidation product. Sulphite was n o t a n i n t e r m e d i a t e in t h i o s u l p h a t e transformations that a c c u m u l a t e d d u r i n g the i n c u b a t i o n period. Other possible transformations of t h i o s u l p h a t e i n c l u d e oxidation to products other t h a n sul- phate, r e d u c t i o n or disproportionation. H i g h n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g activity (up to 10.8 ~tmol h - cm -3} was p r e s e n t in this s e d i m e n t a n d the m a x i m a of nitrate r e d u c t i o n c o r r e l a t e d with m a x i m a of t h i o s u l p h a t e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n (Fig. 2b). T h e highest v a l u e s of b o t h reactions were f o u n d in the first 1-2 cm of the s e d i m e n t , a s e c o n d m a x i m u m was at 3 - 4 cm depth. Both of these m a x i m a correlated well w i t h m i m m u m values of n i t r a t e in the s e d i m e n t (Table 1).

T h e s e d i m e n t n e a r F~ihrdorf

(9)

V i a b l e cells, s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g b a c t e r i a , c h e m i c a l p a r a m e t e r s 231

sediment

depth (cm)

0

_

4

6

8

10

12

16

1 8 -

20

1 0 4

N

~

L

\

D

/

I l i i

z

i l

i

I 111111 L I 111111

105

106

--~-- aerobic SOB

---E~-- anaerobic SOB

, 0

PSB

I I i Ilkll I I t I illtl [ ['"['1 IFli

10 7

10 8

viable counts * c m - 8 sediment

Fig. 3. Viable counts of sulphur-oxidizing bacteria at F~ihrdorf. S O B = S u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g bacteria; PSB = Purple s u l p h u r bacteria. Viable counts of a n a e r o b i c SOB were d e t e r m i n e d u n d e r anoxic

(10)

232

sediment

depth (cm)

0

2,

6 -

_

1~ 1

12

J. F. I m h o f f , A. S c h n e i d e r & L. P o d g o r s e k

\ .-

@

.~,J

I

-(.~

\

\

\

%

1~ 1

[3-

2-

t

9

SO 4

formation

18

2-

---0- $ 2 0 3

consumption

2 0

0

2

4

6

8

10

transformation rates

(11)

V i a b l e ceils, s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g b a c t e r i a , c h e m i c a l p a r a m e t e r s

sediment

depth (cm)

0

2

~9

233

4

6

8

1~

14

'~

18

\

10

L i i h i

' - , ,

9

J J /

J

J J J

. / . f l -

j /

[]

SO4 2-

/

formation

J . i / / "

---~:~--S2032-consumption

z~

N 0 3

r e d u c t i o n

20

0

2

4

6

8

10

transformation rates

(12)

234 J. F. I m h o f f , A. S c h n e i d e r & L. P o d g o r s e k

Table 2. Chemical parameters of a s e d i m e n t from F~ihrdorf. SN = water close to the s e d i m e n t surface; n.d. not d e t e c t e d

Salinity* Chloride Sulphate Sulphate/ Sulphide Nitrate Phosphate % mM m M Chloride" " ~M aM HM SN water I2.85 200.7 11.01 54.9 8 9.1 8.7 Sediment

0 - I cm I3.00 202.8 10.42 51.4 14 5.7 17.8 1-2 cm 13.30 207.7 11.10 53.4 12 45.6 0.I 2-3 cm 14.53 227.0 13.34 58.8 14 6.0 n.d. 3-4 cm 14.51 226.6 13.47 59.5 276 1.7 654.3 4-6 cm 15.17 236.8 13.36 56.4 139 34.6 169.8 6-8 cm 13.26 207.1 11.20 54.1 232 3.4 184.9 8-10 cm 13.92 217.3 10.65 49.0 29 3.4 394.1 10-15 cm 12.52 195.5 8.80 45.0 154 5.2 11.4 15-20 cm 10.49 170.8 8.21 48,1 - 27.0 6.1 9 calculated from the concentration of chloride m % according to Wooster et al. (I969L

* * calculated from the concentrations (mM) a n d multiplied by 1000: (value of s t a n d a r d sea water

is 51.7).

r a t i o w e r e u n u s u a l l y h i g h ( T a b l e 2), i n p a r t i c u l a r a t t h e 2 - 6 c m d e p t h . D i s t i n c t l a y e r s w i t h c h a n g i n g c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of s u l p h i d e I m a x i m u m a t 3 - 8 cm), n i t r a t e ( m i n i m a at 2 4 c m a n d 6 - 1 2 c m m a x i m a at 1 - 2 c m a n d 4 - 6 c m l , a n d p h o s p h a t e ( s t r o n g m i n i m u m a t 1 - 3 c m , s t r o n g m a x i m u m at 3 - 1 0 cmJ w e r e f o u n d . In p a r t i c u l a r , t h e e n o r m o u s c o n c e n t r a t i o n g r a d i e n t of p h o s p h a t e , b e t w e e n v e r y h i g h v a l u e s of m o r e t h a n 650 u M a t a 3 - 4 c m d e p t h a n d u n d e t e c t a b l e t r a c e s at a 2 - 3 c m d e p t h , p o i n t s to h i g h l y a c t i v e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s . S i m i l a r to t h e s e d i m e n t of H i d d e n s e e , t h i s s e d i m e n t a p p e a r e d to b e a s o u r c e o f p h o s p h a t e for t h e s u p e r n a t a n t w a t e r .

A l t h o u g h l o w e r n u m b e r s of a e r o b i c a n d n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g s u l p h u r - o x i d i z e r s w e r e p r e s e n t in t h e t o p l a y e r of t h i s s e d i m e n t c o m p a r e d to t h o s e f r o m H i d d e n s e e (Fig. 3), v i a b l e c e l l n u m b e r s i n t h e d e e p e r s e d i m e n t w e r e i n a s i m i l a r o r d e r of m a g n i t u d e i n b o t h s e d i m e n t s . A e r o b i c s u l p h u r - o x i d i z e r s h a d q u i t e c o n s t a n t c e l l n u m b e r s o v e r t h e w h o l e s e d i m e n t c o r e , w i t h a s l i g h t m a x i m u m a t a d e p t h of 8 - 1 0 c m . N i t r a t e r e d u c e r s h a d a s l i g h t m a x i m u m a t 1 - 2 c m a n d c o n s t a n t l y h i g h v i a b l e c e l l n u m b e r s f r o m 4 - 6 c m . A n a p p a r e n t m a s s d e v e l o p m e n t of p h o t o t r o p h i c p u r p l e s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a w a s n o t v i s i b l e . N e v e r t h e l e s s . v i a b l e n u m b e r s of t h e s e b a c t e r i a w e r e h i g h i n t h e t o p l a y e r of t h e s e d i m e n t (2 - 106 c e l l s c m -3 s e e Fig. 3). C o m p a r e d t o a n e a r l i e r s a m p l i n g i n A p r i l 1992, t h e y h a d i n c r e a s e d b y t h r e e o r d e r s of m a g n i t u d e , b u t still w e r e t w o o r d e r s of m a g n i t u d e l o w e r t h a n t h o s e f r o m H i d d e n s e e . G r e e n s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a w e r e p r e s e n t i n i n s i g n i f i c a n t n u m b e r s a n d c o u l d n o t b e q u a n t i f i e d .

(13)

Viable cells, s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g bacteria, c h e m i c a l p a r a m e t e r s 235

o x i d i z e d to sulphate. T h e s e rates c o i n c i d e d with m a x i m u m v a l u e s of nitrate r e d u c t i o n in the s a m e layers (3.8 ~mol h -1 cm -3 a n d 8.2 ~mol h - l cm -3, respectively) a n d h i g h viable cell counts of nitrate r e d u c i n g bacteria.

D I S C U S S I O N

Q u a n t i t a t i v e e n u m e r a t i o n of s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g b a c t e r i a with s e l e c t i v e m e d i a and m e a s u r e m e n t s of potential transformation rates of t h i o s u l p h a t e and nitrate, c o m b i n e d with the c h e m i c a l analyses of p o r e w a t e r i n d i c a t e d the i m p o r t a n c e of b a c t e r i a in the c h e m i c a l p r o c e s s e s occurring w i t h i n the sediments. F u r t h e r m o r e , distinct m a x i m a of s e v e r a l c h e m i c a l p a r a m e t e r s a n d of m e a s u r e d activities r e v e a l e d a c o m p l e x m u l t i l a y e r e d structure of the i n v e s t i g a t e d s e d i m e n t s .

A l t h o u g h nitrate c o n c e n t r a t i o n s in the i n v e s t i g a t e d s e d i m e n t s w e r e q u i t e low (below 10 ttM, at m a x i m a up to 50 ~M), nitrate a p p e a r e d to b e an i m p o r t a n t e l e c t r o n donor for the oxidation of r e d u c e d s u l p h u r c o m p o u n d s in sulphidic sediments. H i g h n u m b e r s of n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g b a c t e r i a a n d h i g h potential activities of nitrate r e d u c t i o n a n d thiosul- p h a t e oxidation in the s a m e s e d i m e n t layers, i.e. 3-4 cm d e p t h in the H i d d e n s e e s e d i m e n t a n d 1-2 cm d e p t h in the F~hrdorf sediment, point to an active role of t h e s e b a c t e r i a in the r e s p e c t i v e s e d i m e n t layers. A l t h o u g h t h i o s u l p h a t e oxidation is s t i m u l a t e d in the p r e s e n c e of nitrate, s u l p h a t e is not f o r m e d in e q u i v a l e n t quantities. It appears, therefore, that s u l p h a t e is only a m i n o r oxidation p r o d u c t of t h i o s u l p h a t e w h e n nitrate is the e l e c t r o n acceptor. It is c o n c l u d e d that n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g b a c t e r i a play an i m p o r t a n t role in the t u r n o v e r of r e d u c e d sulphur c o m p o u n d s in anoxic parts of m a r i n e sediments, as l o n g as nitrate is available.

T h e i m p o r t a n c e of aerobic s u l p h u r - o x i d i z i n g b a c t e r i a in the top layer of the H i d d e n - see s e d i m e n t is d e m o n s t r a t e d by significant oxidation rates of t h i o s u l p h a t e to s u l p h a t e a n d by m a x i m a of v i a b l e cell counts in this layer. In the d a r k and u n d e r conditions of b l o c k e d o x y g e n transfer b e t w e e n a t m o s p h e r e a n d w a t e r column, the release of s u l p h i d e from the s e d i m e n t surface into the w a t e r strongly i n c r e a s e d as s h o w n by e x p e r i m e n t s with intact s e d i m e n t cores. T h e r e f o r e . o x y g e n is r e g a r d e d as the most i m p o r t a n t e l e c t r o n a c c e p t o r for o x i d a t i o n of r e d u c e d sulphur c o m p o u n d s in the surface l a y e r of t h e sedi- ments, a n d a e r o b i c s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a play a p r e d o m i n a n t role in t h e s e reactions.

H i g h n u m b e r s a n d e v e n m a x i m a of (facultative) a e r o b i c b a c t e r i a in the a n o x i c parts of the s e d i m e n t s point to their m e t a b o l i c flexibility a n d t h e i r potential of a n a e r o b i c transformations. It is well e s t a b l i s h e d that d e n i t r i f y i n g b a c t e r i a are f a c u l t a t i v e aerobes. A l t h o u g h a g e n e r a l conclusion on the p a r t i c i p a t i o n of facultative a e r o b e s in nitrate r e d u c t i o n in anoxic s e d i m e n t layers is not possible, the o c c u r r e n c e of h i g h n u m b e r s of a e r o b i c s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a in distinct s e d i m e n t layers w i t h m a x i m a of d e n i t r i f y i n g bacteria, active denitrification and m i n i m u m nitrate c o n c e n t r a t i o n s m a y be i n d i c a t i v e of the m e t a b o l i c activity of t h e s e b a c t e r i a u n d e r a n a e r o b i c conditions.

(14)

2 3 6 J. F. I m h o f f , A. S c h n e i d e r & L. P o d g o r s e k

for t h e o x i d a t i o n of s u l p h i d e a n d o t h e r r e d u c e d s u l p h u r c o m p o u n d s i n t h e i n v e s t i g a t e d s e d i m e n t s , a s is d e m o n s t r a t e d b y t h e i r h i g h n u m b e r s i n t h e t o p s e d i m e n t l a y e r s of b o t h s a m p l i n g sites. T h e a c t i v e r o l e of t h e p u r p l e s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a i n t h e o x i d a t i o n of r e d u c e d s u l p h u r c o m p o u n d s w i t h i n t h e s e d i m e n t is e v i d e n t f r o m t h e f a c t t h a t m o s t of t h e i r c e l l s w e r e f i l l e d u p w i t h s t o r e d e l e m e n t a l s u l p h u r - a n i n t e r m e d i a t e i n t h e o x i d a t i o n of s u l p h i d e to s u l p h a t e . A d d i t i o n a l l y , i n s e d i m e n t c o r e s w h i c h s t r o n g l y r e l e a s e d s u l p h i d e i n t o t h e s u p e r n a t a n t w a t e r w h e n o x y g e n s u p p l y w a s i n h i b i t e d for 12 h o u r s i n t h e d a r k (13.5 ,~M s u l p h i d e ) , t h e m a j o r p a r t of t h i s s u l p h i d e w a s o x i d i z e d w h e n o x y g e n w a s a l l o w e d to d i f f u s e i n t o w a t e r a n d w h e n t h e s e d i m e n t w a s i l l u m i n a t e d . O n l y 1 to 1.5 ~ M s u l p h i d e w e r e r e l e a s e d u n d e r t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s d u r i n g a 12 h p e r i o d . B l a c k b u r n e t al. (1975) d e m o n s t r a t e d t h e p r e d o m i n a n t r o l e of p h o t o t r o p h i c b a c t e r i a b y s i m i l i a r e x p e r i - m e n t s i n s e d i m e n t c o r e s , too. P h o t o t r o p h i c s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a a n d a e r o b i c c h e m o t r o p h i c s u l p h u r b a c t e r i a c e r t a i n l y a r e c o m p e t i n g s u l p h u r - o x i d i z e r s i n t h e t o p l a y e r s of t h e i n v e s t i g a t e d s e d i m e n t s , i n p a r t i c u l a r b e c a u s e s o m e of t h e p h o t o t r o p h i c p u r p l e b a c t e r i a c a n u s e o x y g e n a s a n e l e c t r o n a c c e p t o r d u r i n g c h e m o t r o p h i c g r o w t h ( K ~ m p f & P f e n n i g , 1980). W e c o n c l u d e t h a t t h e c o m b i n e d a c t i o n of b o t h g r o u p s of b a c t e r i a m o s t e f f i c i e n t l y o x i d i z e s r e d u c e d s u l p h u r c o m p o u n d s i n t h e t o p l a y e r s of t h e s e d i m e n t s . N i t r a t e m a y r e p l a c e o x y g e n as f i n a l e l e c t r o n a c c e p t o r a n d will s u p p o r t o x i d a t i o n of s u l p h i d e ~ i n p a r t i c u l a r w h e n o x y g e n a n d l i g h t a r e l i m i t i n g .

Acknowledgements. This work was s u p p o r t e d by the grant DYSMON A2 of the B u n d e s m i n i s t e r ffir Forschung u n d Technologie of Germany.

L I T E R A T U R E C I T E D

Blackburn. T. H.. Kleiber. P & Fenchel T., 1975. Photosynthetic sulphide oxidation in m a r i n e sediments. - Oikos 26. 103-108.

F e h e n F. & Laue. W. 1956. Beitr~ge zur C h e m i e des Schwefels. 29. Ober die D a r s t e l l u n g von R o h s u l f a n e n . - Z. anorg, allg. Chem. 288. 103-112.

Imhoff. J. F.. 1988. A n o x y g e n i c phototrophic bacteria. In: M e t h o d s in aquatm bacteriology. Ed. by B. Austin. Wiley, Chichester. 207-240.

J 6 r g e n s e n . B. B., 1982. Mineralization of organic m a t t e r in t h e sea b e d - the role of sulfate reduction. - Nature. Lond. 296. 643-645.

J 6 r g e n s e n . B. B. & Bak. F.. 1991. P a t h w a y s and microbiology of thiosulfate t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s and sulfate reduction in a m a n n e s e d i m e n t - Appl. e n v i r o n Microbiol. 57. 847-856.

K~impf, C. & Pfennig, N., 1980. Capacity of C h r o m a t i a c e a e for chemotrophic g r o w t h - Arch. Microbiol. 127, 125-135.

Lorant, I. S., 1929. Uber eine n e u e colorimetrische M e t h o d e zur B e s t i m m u n g d e s Schwefels in Sulfiden. Sulfaten usw, - Hoppe-Seyler's Z. physiol. Chem. 185. 245-266.

Pachmayr, F.. 1960. V o r k o m m e n u n d B e s t i m m u n g yon S c h w e f e l v e r b i n d u n q e n in Mineralwasser. Diss.. Univ. Mtinchen, 48 pp.

Pfennig, N. & TKiper, H. G. 1992. T h e family Chromatiaceae. In: The Prokaryotes. Ed. by A. Balows. H. G. Trtiper, M. Dworkin, W. H a r d e r & K. H. Sehleifer. Springer. N e w York, Vol. 4. 3200-3221. Suckow. R,. 1966. S c h w e f e l m i k r o b e n g e s e l l s c h a f t e n der See- u n d Boddengew~isser y o n H i d d e n s e e .

- Z. allg. Mikrobiol. 6, 309-315.

Widdel. F., 1988. Microbiology a n d ecology of sulfate- a n d sulfur-reducing bacteria. In: Biology of a n a e r o b i c microorganisms. Ed. b y A. J, B. Z e h n d e r . Wiley, New York. 469-585.

Figure

Table 1. Chemical parameters of a sediment from Hiddensee. Values in brackets were taken from a dialysis pore water sampler
Fig. 1. Viable counts of sulphur-oxidizing bacteria at Hiddensee. SOB = Sulphur-oxidizing bacteria, PSB = Purple sulphur bacteria: Viable counts of anaerobic SOB were determined under anoxic conditions with nitrate as electron acceptor
Fig. 2a. Transformation rates of thiosulphate and sulphate under aerobic conditions in the sediment from Hiddensee (~tmol cm -3 sediment h-ll
Fig. 2b. Transformation rates of thiosulphate, sulphate and nitrate under anaerobic conditions in the sediment from Hiddensee (~mol cm -3 sediment h -1)
+4

References

Related documents

lustrates the time course in S-GOT in hepa- titis contacts with abnormal variability in S-GOT. It is worth emphasizing that, in spite of living in the same households with one or

19% serve a county. Fourteen per cent of the centers provide service for adjoining states in addition to the states in which they are located; usually these adjoining states have

In terms of each chiropractor ’ s primary job only (not reported in the tables) as opposed to employment in general, 11 individuals (2 %) did clinical work at a hos- pital in

It was decided that with the presence of such significant red flag signs that she should undergo advanced imaging, in this case an MRI, that revealed an underlying malignancy, which