Pulsed
Doppler
Determinations
of Cardiac
Output
in Neonates:
Normal
Standards
for
Clinical
Use
Frans
J. Walther,
MD, PhD,
Bijan
Siassi,
MD, Naglaa
A. Ramadan,
MD,
Ananda
K. Ananda,
MD, and Paul V. K. Wu, MD
From the Neonatology Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center, Los Angeles
ABSTRACT.
Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output can greatly facilitate the clinical assessment and man-agement of neonates with cardiovascular compromise. To assess normal values of cardiac output in neonates, mean blood flow velocity was measured in the ascending aorta from a suprasternal approach using a range-gated, pulsedDoppler velocity meter, and aortic root diameter was
determined from an M-mode echocardiogram. These techniques were combined, and cardiac output was
eva!-uated in 59 healthy premature and 62 term newborn
infants during the first week of life. Birth weights ranged from 780 g to 4,740 g and gestational age from 27 to 42
weeks. Cardiac output values increased linearly with
ad-vancing birth weight (r = +.94,
P
< .001) and gestational age (r = +.95,P
< .001). Mean cardiac output values (±SD) per kilogram of body weight were 249 ± 34 mL/mm/kg and decreased with advancing birth weight: <1,500 g = 265 ± 32 mL/min/kg; 1,500 to 2,500 g = 253
± 34 mL/min/kg; and >2,500 g = 241 ± 33 mL/min/kg.
For clinical use, 325 mL/min/kg and 200 mL/min/kg can
be used as upper and lower limits of normal, respectively.
Doppler cardiac output estimates compared favorably
with studies using invasive techniques.
Pediatrics
1985; 76:829-833; cardiac output, neonate, pulsed Doppler tech-nique, echocardiography.The combination of range-gated, pulsed Doppler
and
echocardiographic
techniques provides reliableestimates of aortic root blood flow and of left
yen-tricular output which compare closely with the
“gold-standard”
Fick
principle
in infants
and
chil-dren.’3
Noninvasive
monitoring
of cardiac
output
can
greatly
facilitate
the
clinical
assessment
and
Received for publication July 30, 1984; accepted Dec 13, 1984. Dr Walther is a Fuibright research scholar.
Reprint requests to (F.J.W.) Department of Neonatology, Uni-versity of Limburg, P0 Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The
Netherlands.
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 1985 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
management of neonates with birth asphyxia,
hy-potensive shock, persistent fetal circulation, and assisted ventilation.4 Normal values of cardiac
out-put in relation to birth weight and gestational age
have
not
yet
been
established
using
this
method.
The purpose of this study was to estimate
Doppler-derived cardiac output in healthy premature and
term neonates.
MATERIALS
AND
METHODS
A total
of 121
healthy
premature
and
term
new-born infants admitted to the newborn nursery of
Women’s Hospital of Los Angeles County-Univer-sity of Southern California Medical Center were
studied. Informed parental consent was a
require-ment for the study. Within each 500-g birth weight
subgroup between 750 g and 4,750 g, at least 12 healthy newborn infants were selected for study
(Table).
All were
in a steady,
quiet
state
during
the
examination. Exclusion criteria were clinical,
echo-cardiographic, or radiographic evidence of
cardio-vascular or respiratory abnormalities, respiratory assistance, a hematocrit value below 45%, infants of mothers with diabetes mellitus, and infants with
a birth weight below the 10th percentile of the
Lubchenco curves.5 Premature neonates with
din-ical or echocardiographic evidence of a patent
duc-tus arteriosus were excluded from the study. Also
excluded were infants with left ventricular
myocar-dial dysfunction as diagnosed by M-mode
echocar-diography (Picker Echoview System 80C with a 5.0
MHz
or
7.5
MHz
transducer)
in
the
presence
of
abnormal left ventricular shortening fraction, left
ventricular systolic time interval and/or left atrial
to aortic ratio. Gestational age was estimated from
the first day of the mother’s last menstrual period
TABLE.
Cha
racte ristics of the S tudy Population* Wt Groups (g) n Birth Wt (g) Gesta-tional Age (wk) 5ex (M/F) ApgarAt 1 At 5
mm mm
Age at
Exami-nation (d)
Cardiac Output Aortic Diameter (cm) . mL/min . mL/min/kg
750-1,249 14 1,057 ± 154 27.9 ± 0.8 5/9 4.8 ± 2.1 7.1 ± 2.0 5.2 ± 2.8 275 ± 37 262 ± 31 0.68 ± 0.06 1,250-1,749 23 1,492 ± 151 30.9 ± 1.3 9/14 5.9 ± 2.2 8.2 ± 0.8 2.6 ± 0.6 388 ± 60 261 ± 36 0.76 ± 0.06
1,750-2,249 14 2,004 ± 139 33.6 ± 1.1 10/4 7.6 ± 1.4 8.5 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 1.0 522 ± 92 259 ± 35 0.86 ± 0.07
2,250-2,749 13 2,458 ± 158 35.8 ± 1.4 8/5 7.7 ± 1.7 8.5 ± 1.2 1.4 ± 0.8 602 ± 85 244 ± 27 0.91 ± 0.07 2,750-3,249 15 2,977 ± 164 39.6 ± 1.4 8/7 8.5 ± 0.5 9.0 ± 0 1.5 ± 0.9 737 ± 128 247 ± 37 1.00 ± 0.08
3,250-3,749 15 3,504 ± 160 41.1 ± 0.8 3/12 7.9 ± 1. 9.1 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 0.9 902 ± 120 257 ± 35 1.00 ± 0.07 3,750-4,249 15 4,033 ± 143 40.6 ± 1.2 8/7 7.7 ± 1.3 8.9 ± 0.5 1.3 ± 0.6 924 ± 119 229 ± 31 1.05 ± 0.06 4,250-4,750 12 4,468 ± 163 40.7 ± 0.9 8/4 8.0 ± 0.9 9.0 ± 0 1.4 ± 0.7 987 ± 67 221 ± 15 1.05 ± 0.05
Total 121 2,648 ± 1,141 35.9 ± 4.9 59/62 7.2 ± 1.9 8.5 ± 1.1 2.2 ± 1.7 645 ± 264 249 ± 34 0.90 ± 0.14
*Values are means ± 1 SD.
If there
was
a discrepancy
of more
than
2 weeks
between
the
estimated
ages
based
on the
last
men-strual period and the Ballard method, the latter
was used. Gestational age ranged from 27 to 42
weeks and birth weight from 780 g to 4,740 g. Age
at
study
ranged
from
24 to
72 hours
in newborns
weighing
more
than
1,250
g and
from
one
to eight
days in newborn infants weighing less than 1,250 g
(Table).
Blood
velocity
in the
ascending
aorta
was
mea-sured by using a 3.5-MHz,
range-gated,
pulsed-ultrasound Doppler velocity meter (Cardioflo TM,
Cardionics,
Houston).
A nonfocused,
6-mm
diame-ter
transducer
was
positioned
in the
suprasternal
notch
on
a layer
of airless
contact
gel.
It was
an-gulated
so that
the
ultrasound
beam
was
coaxially
aligned
as
closely
as
possible
with
the
ascending
aorta
and
was
directed
into
the
region
just
above
the aortic valve leaflets. Sample volume depth (1.5
cm
to
3.5
cm)
was
adjusted
for
maximum
systolic
velocity,
and
gain
control
was
reduced
until
the
diastolic jitter disappeared and the baseline was
approximately
flat.
The
highest
velocity
signals
obtained
during
30
to
60
cardiac
cycles
were
re-corded
on
a
strip
chart
recorder.
Zero-crossing
counter analysis provided the mean Doppler
fre-quency
shift.
The
mean
aortic
blood
flow
velocity
was calculated according to the Doppler equation:
V =
(1
x
c)/(2
XF x cos
0),where
V
=velocity
in
centimeters
per
second,
f
=frequency
shift
in Hertz,
C = speed of sound in blood,
F
=frequency
of
transmitted ultrasound, and 0 =
angle
between
blood
flow
vector
and
ultrasound
beam.
Cos
0was
assumed to be 1 as the angle of incidence is kept
between
0#{176}
± 15#{176}using a suprasternal approach.7The
aortic
root
dimension
was
measured
on the
M-mode
echocardiogram
in early
diastole
with
lead-ing edge methodology,8 ie, from the anterior aortic
wall
to the
anterior
boundary
of the
posterior
wall
in an
area
that
visualized
centered
aortic
valvular
tissue to reduce the potential for angulation error.8
A minimum
of three
cardiac
cycles
were
measured,
and
mean
values
were
calculated
in hundredths
of
centimeters.
Cardiac
output
was
calculated
from
the
volumet-rid flow
equation:
Q
=ir
X &/4 X V X 60,where
Q
=
volumetric
flow
in
milliliters
per
minute,
d =diameter
of the
aorta
in centimeters,
and
V =mean
velocity
in centimeters
per
second.
All cardiac
out-put
calculations
assumed
an
aortic
diameter
of 1.0
cm and
were
recalculated
using
the
actual
diameter.
Cardiac
output
was
plotted
against
gestational
age and birth weight, and correlation coefficients
were
determined
by linear
regression
analysis.
Stu-dent’s t test was used to estimate the significance
of the
correlation
coefficients
and
the
differences
between
the
means
of two
samples.
All
values
are
given
as means
± 1SD.
RESULTS
Fifty-nine
healthy
premature
and
62 term
infants
were
studied.
Cardiac
output
values
increased
grad-ually
with
increasing
birth
weight
(Fig
1),
with
a
correlation
coefficient
of
.94
(P
< .001). Meancardiac
output
per
kilogram
of body
weight
was
249
±
34
mL/min/kg
(Table)
and
decreased
slightly
with
increasing
birth
weight:
less
than
1,500
g (n
=27) 265 ± 32
mL/min/kg,
from
1,500
to
2,500
g
(n =
31)
253 ± 34 mL/min/kg, andgreater
than
2,500 g (n =
63)
241
±33 mL/min/kg
(Fig
2). The
difference
between
neonates
less
than
1,500
g and
esti-S C E E D a. p.. D 0 C.) a ‘C C.) LU -i a. a. 0 a :. . S 1000 800 600 400 200 Regression Line C E E I-. a. I-0 0 ‘C a ‘C 0 a: LU -J a. a. 0 a 1000 800 600 400 200 I S 8 n =121 y70.3+217.1 Cx) r O.4 a 8
I n= 121
y=50.6 Cx)-1169.9 r 095
,
350 E 300 E:
250 I-a. 200 0 0 ‘C a a: 100t
95% 50%Our
study
provides
normal
values
for
Doppler-derived
cardiac
output
in premature
and
term
new-born
infants
with
normal
cardiovascular
systems.
Prior
to this,
only
one
study
had
described
Doppler
cardiac
output
values
in healthy
neonates.9
Alver-son et al.9 reported cardiac output values of 221 ±
56 mL/min/kg in eight premature neonates and 236 ± 47
mL/min/kg
in
14 term
neonates
in the
first
week
of
life.
Our
results
are
comparable
to
those of Alverson’s in term newborn infants, but
they
differ
for
premature
neonates.
Our
data
con-firm
the
observation
of Wallgren
et
alio thatpre-mature
newborns
without
cardiovascular
abnor-malities
(such
as persistent
ductus
arteriosus)
have
a slightly
higher
cardiac
output
per
kilogram
of
body weight than term infants. The discrepancy
between
our
results
and
Alverson’s1’9
may
be due
to
the smaller number of patients in that study and
to the
technique
used
to estimate
aortic
diameter.
In
Alverson’s”9
studies,
systolic
aortic
internal
diameter
was
used
rather
than
the
late
diastolic
leading
edge
method
proposed
by
the
American
Society
of Echocardiography.8
In comparison
with
diastolic
internal
estimates,
systolic
internal
mea-surements lead to about a 5% overestimation of
aortic
diameter.
In contrast,
the
use
ofthe
leading
1200 1200
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
BIRTHwEIGHT(kg) C. ‘ ‘ I 1 I I I I I II
Fig 1.
Relationship
between
birthweight
and
pulsed
27 GESTATIONAL A:: (weeks) 42Doppler
determinations
of cardiac
output
in neonates.
Fig 3.
Relationship
between
gestational
age and pulsed
Doppler determinations of cardiac output in neonates.
DISCUSSION
n= 121
y276.6- 10.4 Cx)
r-0.35
05 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
BIRTHWEIGHT (kg)
Fig 2.
Relationship
between
birth
weight
and
pulsed
Doppler
determinations
of cardiac
output
expressed
per
kilogram of body weight in neonates.
mates were inclusive for this range. Cardiac output
also
increased
directly
with
increasing
gestational
age
(Fig
3) with
a correlation
coefficient
of .95
(P
<
.001).
Aortic
diameter
measurements
showed
a steady
increase
with
increasing
birth
weight
(Table),
with
a correlation
coefficient
of .89
(P
<.001),
slope
=0.11,
y-intercept
=0.60
cm,
SD
= .067cm,
and
a
edge method in systole leads to an increment of less
than 5%12
In our
study
we
measured
aortic
diam-eter with leading
edge
methodology
in early
diastole
instead of late diastole, because we found it a more
easily discernible point of measurement. It leads to values that are slightly lower than the end-systolic
leading edge dimension and slightly higher than the
end-diastolic leading edge dimension. This method
probably provides a more realistic reflection of the
aortic dimension from the opening of the aortic
valves to their closure. In consideration of the
van-able
expansion
of the
aortic
root
in systole8
and
the
inconsistences of recording techniques on the mea-sunement of the internal aortic diameter, we prefer the leading edge
method
in early
diastole.
Pulsed Doppler echocardiography for measuring
cardiac
output
has
been
tested
in animal
models7
and
is
being
increasingly
applied
to
older
chil-dren.13 With only a slight modification, we were
able
to
apply
this
method
in premature
and
term
neonates. To use this technique appropriately, one must
be aware
of its
limitations
and
potential
er-rors. Motion artifacts should be avoided, so the
patient should be studied during quiet sleep or be
adequately
restrained.
Angles
of
incidence
of the
Doppler
beam
should
not
exceed
15#{176}
to the
axis
of
the ascending aorta, as this will yield lower blood
flow
velocities
and
underestimate
cardiac
output
values.
Precise
measurement
of the
aortic
root
di-mension is critical because this measurement is
squared in the volumetric flow equation.
Further-more, the presence of a pneumothorax and/or a
pneumomediastinum prevents the passage of
ultra-sound and limits the use
of the
Doppler
technique
in these situations.
The results of our study compare favorably with
previous reports using invasive methods in healthy
neonates.’36 Emmanouilides et al’3 reported
mdi-cator dilution studies in 23 normal term neonates
(mean
birth
weight
3.27
kg)
at 6 to 34 hours
of age
and found a mean left ventricular output of 246 ±
95 mL/min/kg (830 ± 270 mL/min). Using similar
techniques, Gessner et al’4 reported cardiac output
values of 254 ± 53 mL/min/kg in 14 term neonates (mean birth weight 3.17 kg) at 0 to 2 hours
of age,
whereas Arcilla et al’5 measured mean values of 222
mL/min/kg in 47 term neonates (mean birth weight
3.63
kg) at
2#{189}to 54 hours of age. All of these resultsare consistent with ours. Burnard et al’6 studied
left ventricular output by thermal dilution in a
group of 18 healthy term newborn infants (mean
birth weight 3.18 kg) aged 2 to 28 hours and found
cardiac
output
values
of
348
± 42 mL/min/kg.Burnard’s’3’16 higher values can be explained by
cooling and the presence of significant left-to-right shunts at atrial and/or ductal levels. Noninvasive
cardiac
output
estimates
during
the
neonatal
period
using impedance cardiography provide inconsistent results in the lower range in comparison to the
Doppler
technique17”8
and
are
hampered
by
the
need
to use
a hematocnit-related
correction
factor.’7
Pulsed
Doppler
offers
a reliable
noninvasive
es-timate of cardiac output for clinical use in
new-borns. We have found the normal values and limits
presented
here
to be useful
in assessing
abnormal
cardiovascular
states
in the
newborn
nursery.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Jeanine King, MS, PA-C, and Greggory R. DeVore, MD, for technical assistance.
REFERENCES
1. Alverson DC, Eldridge M, Dillon T, et a!: Noninvasive pulsed Doppler determination of cardiac output in neonates and children. J Pediatr 1982;101:46-50
2. Sanders SP, Yeager 5, Williams RG: Measurement of sys-temic and pulmonary blood flow and Qp/Qs ratio using Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Car-diol 1983;51:952-956
3. Meyer RA, Kalavathy A, Korfhagen JC, et a!: Comparison of left to right shunt ratios determined by pulsed Doppler! 2D echo and Fick method. Circulation 1982;66(suppl 2):232 4. Lees MH: Cardiac output determination in the neonate. J
Pediatr 1983;102:709-711
5. Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Boyd B: Intrauterine growth
in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 24 to 42 weeks. Pediatrics
1966;37:403-408
6. Ballard JL, Novali KL, Driver M: A simplified score for
assessment of fetal maturation of newly born infants. J Pediatr 1979;95:769-774
7. Steingart RM, Meller J, Barovick J, et al: Pulsed Doppler
echocardiographic measurement of beat-to-beat changes in stroke volume in dogs. Circulation 1980;62:542-548
8. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, et al: Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography:
Re-sults of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Cir-culation 1978;58:1072-1083
9. Alverson DC, Eldridge MW, Johnson JD, et a!: Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output in healthy preterm and term newborn infants. Am J Perinatol 1984;1:148-151
10. Wallgren G, Hanson JS, Tabakin BS, et a!: Quantitative studies of the human neonatal circulation: V. Hemodynamic findings in premature infants with and without respiratory distress. Acta Paediatr Scand 1967;179(suppl):69-80
11. Greenfield JC Jr, Patel DJ: Relationship between pressure and diameter in the ascending aorta of man. Circ Res
1962;10:778-781
12. Reller MD, Meyer RA, Kaplan 5: Normal aortic root dimen-sions in premature infants. J Clin Ultrasound
1983;11:203-205
13. Emmanouilides GC, Moss AJ, Monset-Couchard M, et a!: Cardiac output in newborn infants. Biol Neonate 1970;15: 186-197
14. Gessner IH, Krovetz U, Benson RW, et a!: Hemodynamic adaptations in the newborn infant. Pediatrics
1965;36:752-762
15. Arcilla RA, Oh W, Waligren G, et al: Quantitative studies of the human neonatal circulation: II. Hemodynamic find-ings in early and late clamping of the umbilical cord. Acta Paediatr Scand 1967;179(suppl):23-42
newborn infant. Gun Sci 1966;31:121-133
17. Costeloe K, Stocks J, Godfrey 5: Cardiac output in the neonatal period using impedance cardiography. Pediotr Res
1977;1 1:1171-1177
18. Freyschuss U, Noack G, Zetterstrom R: Serial measure-ments of thoracic impedance and cardiac output in healthy neonates after normal delivery and caesarean section. Acta Paediatr Scand 1979;68:357-362
PLINY THE YOUNGER
ON HIS WIFE’S
MISCARRIAGE
Pliny
the
Younger
(c. A.D.
61-112),
the
nephew
and
adoptive
son
of Pliny
the
Elder,
studied
under
Quintilian.
After
a brilliant
career
as a lawyer,
he was
praetor,
prefect
for the
treasury,
consul
and
governor
of Bithynia
under
Trajan.
Pliny
published
nine
books
of literary
letters
between
100 and
109 A.D.
One
of
his letters written to his third wife’s grandfather contained the following details
of her
miscarriage.’
I know how anxious you are for us to give you a great-grandchild, so you will be all
the more sorry to hear that your granddaughter has had a miscarriage. Being young and
inexperienced
she
did not realize she was pregnant, failed to take proper precautions,and did several things which were better left undone. She has had a severe lesson, and
paid for her mistake by seriously endangering her life; so that although you must
inevitably feel it hard for your old age to be robbed of a descendent already on the way, you should thank the gods for sparing your granddaughter’s life even though they denied you the child for the present. They will surely grant us children later on, and we may take
hope
from
this
evidence
of her fertility,
though
the proof
has been
unfortunate.
I am giving you the same advice and encouragement as I use myself for your desire
for greatgrandchildren cannot be keener than mine for children. Their descent from
both of us should make their road to office easy; I can leave them a well-known name
and an established
ancestry
if only
they
may be born
and
turn
our present
grief to joy.
REFERENCE
Noted by T.E.C., Jr, MD