• No results found

Some Generalized Multivariate G-Function Distributions of Matrix Argument and Statistical Properties and Integral Transform

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Some Generalized Multivariate G-Function Distributions of Matrix Argument and Statistical Properties and Integral Transform"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Some Generalized Multivariate G-Function Distributions of Matrix Argument

and Statistical Properties and Integral Transform

Dr A. K. Vyas Department of Mathematics

JodhpurNationalUniversity Jodhpur

Abstract:- In the present paper we have discussed various generalized multivariate G-Function distributions of matrix argument and statistical properties and integral transform few known or new properties such as characteristic function, moment generating function, moment, mean and variance and Mellin and Laplace transforms of the distribution function and some new table are also established for distribution function.

Introduction

A unified approach to generate probability distributions with the help of special functions technique was initiated by Mathai and Saxena(1966), Saxena and Mishra (1991) have investigated a more comprehensive from of

univariate distributions by taking a generalized Laplace integral incorporating 2

F

2 function. From this result wide classes of distributions have been obtained as particular cases. Sethi and Poonam (1992) have investigated a more

comprehensive form of univariate distribution by taking a generalized Laplace integral involving 2

F

2 of matrix argument. From this result, wide classes of distributions have been obtained as particular cases.

In this paper, a generalized multivariate G-function distribution are introduced from which almost all well-known multivariate and univariate G-function distributions can be obtained as special cases. It depends on the multivariate Laplace integral, our distribution in analogues to the generalized probability distribution given by Poonam and Sethi P.L. (1992C) and has applications in multivariate analysis. It may provide some interesting special random variables obtained in various fields of statistical studies particularly in the field of biosciences, agricultural, social and behavioral sciences along with the resent techniques utilized in the geo-statistical and atmospheric sciences.

In this paper expression for the characteristic function. The Moment Generating Function and the

r

th Moment about the origin, mean, variance, Mellin and Laplace Transform have been worked out. In what follows, the argument and the parameter and restricted to take only those values for which the density functions are non-negative and have a meaning.

THE DISTRIBUTION

In the multivariate Laplace type integral

 

 

0

2 1

X

m

dX

X

X

BX

etr

I

Taking

 

s r q

p s

r

b

a

b

a

RX

X

G

...

1 ... 1 ,

,

(2)

)

1

.

2

(

...

,

2

1

.... 1

... ... ... 1 1 1 ,

,

1

 

r

s q

p s r

a

a

b

b

m

RB

G

B

I

For

(

1

,...,

)

2

1

min

Re

b

j

m

j

p

and B is positive definite symmetric matrix and R is an arbitrary complex symmetric

m

m

matrix.S

The result (2.1) is a direct consequence of the result [Mathai and Saxena 1978,P.114] Thus the function

X

a

a

b

b

B

R

f

X

f

(

)

;

1

,

1

...,

r

,

1

,..

s

;

,

=

   

 

s q

p s r

s r q

p s r m

b

b

a

a

m

RB

G

B

b

b

a

a

RX

G

X

BX

etr

r

... ... ,... 1

,... 1 1

1 ,

, 1

... 1 1 ,

, 2

) 1 (

,

2

1

...

Where

2

1

min

Re

b

j

m

= 0, elsewhere ……… (2.2)

Provides a probability density function(p.d.f.)

Special cases

(i) Replacing R=I letting B tends to null matrix and using the result due to Mathai(1976)

  

 

 

s p j

r q j

j j

q j

j p

j

j

X s

r q

p s r m

a

m

b

m

m

a

m

m

b

m

dX

b

b

a

a

X

G

X

1 1

1 1

0 1,...

1 , , 2

) 1 (

2

1

2

1

)

(

....

Where

)

,...

1

(

;

2

1

)

Re(

)

,..,

1

(

;

2

1

)

Re(

n

j

m

a

m

j

m

b

j j

…………..(2.3)

(3)

 

 

*

2

1

2

1

)

m(b

)

(

2 ,,

1 1

1 1

1 1

j

q p

s r m s

p j

r q j

j j

p j

q j

j

G

X

a

m

b

m

m

a

m

m

X

f

  

  

 

Where

 

s r q

p s r q

p s r

b

b

a

a

X

G

G

*

,....,

...,

1 , 1 , , ,

,

Where

elsewhere

X

X

n

j

m

a

m

j

m

b

j j

,

0

0

),

,...

1

(

;

2

1

)

Re(

)

,..,

1

(

;

2

1

)

Re(

…………..(2.4)

(ii) Putting

p

1

,

q

0

,

r

0

,

s

1

,

B

I

,

then (2.1) takes the form

 

 

0

0 , 1

1 , 0 2

1

)

(

X

m

dX

a

RX

G

X

X

etr

I

 ……….(2.5)

We know that

G

10,,01

RX

a

R

a

X

a

e

trRX

Where

X

X

0

……….(2.6) Use of (2.5) and (2.6) we have

 

   

0

2 1 )

(

X

m a X I R tr a

dX

X

e

R

I

The integral reduces to

( a)

a

R

I

a

m

R

 

 ……….(2.6)

(2.2) takes the form

 

( ) 2

1 ) ( ) (

)

(

a m a X

R I tr

R

I

a

m

X

e

X

f

   

Where

)

7

.

2

(

...

...

...

,

0

0

,

0

Re

,

2

1

Re

elsewhere

X

X

R

I

m

a

Which is a gama distribution.

Taking

,

2

1

)

(

a

m

(2.7) take the form

2 ) 1 ( ) (

2

1

)

(

  

 

m X R I tr

R

I

m

m

e

X

(4)

Where

0

,

0

Re

I

R

X

X

=0 elsewhere ………..(2.8)

Taking

,

2

1

)

(

,

2

)

(

a

n

I

R

T

1 (2.7) yields Wishart distribution with scale matrix

T

and

n

of

freedom

 

2 1

2 1 2 2

2

1

2

1

n m n X T tr

T

n

m

X

e

X

f

 

  

2 1 2

) 1 ( 2

2

2

1

2

n m

n n

T

n

m

X

T

etr

X

 

 

 

For

X

X

0

,

T

0

,

m

n

=

0

,

elsewhere

……….(2.9)

THE CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION

The characteristic function

X

 

T

of

X

is given by

 

T

E

itr

 

XT

X

exp

=

exp

 

 

...

...

.(

2

.

10

)

0

X

dX

X

f

XT

itr

Where

i

 

1

12

,

T

is

m

m

symmetric matrix of characteristic function variables and

E

denotes mathematical expectation.

By Virtue of (2.10), we get characteristic function as

 

   

 

 

s r q

p s r

s r q

p s r X

b

b

a

a

m

RB

B

b

b

a

a

m

iT

B

R

iT

B

T

G

G

,...,

,...,

,

2

1

,...,

,....,

,

2

1

1 1 1

1 ,

, 1

1 1 1

1 ,

, 1

 

Where

,

Re(

)

0

,

Re(

)

Re(

)

2

1

)

min

Re(

,

2

1

)

Re(

m

b

j

m

B

B

R

…(2.11)

(5)

 

   

0

X

dX

X

f

XT

etr

XT

etr

E

……….(2.12)

By virtue of (2.2),we get moment generating function as

   

 

 

s r q

p s r

s r q

p s r

b

b

a

a

m

RB

B

b

b

a

a

m

T

B

R

T

B

XT

etr

E

G

G

,...,

,...,

,

2

1

,...,

,....,

,

2

1

)

(

1 1 1

1 ,

, 1

1 1 1

1 ,

, 1

 

Where

,

Re(

)

0

,

Re(

)

Re(

)

2

1

)

min

Re(

,

2

1

)

Re(

m

b

j

m

B

B

R

…(2.13)

THE MOMENT OF THE DISTRIBUTION

The

r

thorder moment about origin of the matrix random variable

X

with p.d.f. (2.2) is given by

 

 

0

X r r

dX

X

f

X

X

E

……….(2.14)

  

   

s r q

p s r

s r q

p s r r

b

b

a

a

m

RB

b

b

a

a

r

m

RB

B

G

G

,...,

,...,

,

2

1

,...,

,....,

,

2

1

1 1 1

1 ,

, 1

1

1 1

1 ,

, 1

Where the various parameter are governed by same restrictions as mentioned in (2.15)

MEAN AND VARIANCE OF THE DISTRIBUTION BY DEFINITIONS

 

 

0

X

dX

X

f

X

X

E

  

   

s r q

p s r

s r q

p s r

b

b

a

a

m

RB

b

b

a

a

m

RB

B

G

G

,...,

,...,

,

2

1

,...,

,....,

,

1

2

1

1 1 1

1 ,

, 1

1

1 1

1 ,

, 1 1

……..(2.16)

(6)

       s r q p s r s r q p s r

b

b

a

a

m

RB

b

b

a

a

m

RB

B

G

G

,...,

,...,

,

2

1

,...,

,....,

,

2

2

1

1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 1 1 1 , , 1 2

…….(2.17) Variance

, 1

2 , 1 2 1 , , 1 , , 1 1 , , 1 2

]

[

]

[

]

[

]

[





        

G

G

G

G

q p s r q p s r q p s r q p s r

B

Where

     s r q p s r q p s r

b

b

a

a

m

RB

G

G

,

,...

,....,

,

2

2

1

]

[

1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 , , 1

     s r q p s r q p s r

b

b

a

a

m

RB

G

G

,

,...

,....,

,

2

1

]

[

1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 , , 1

     s r q p s r q p s r

b

b

a

a

m

RB

G

G

,

,...

,....,

,

1

2

1

]

[

1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 , , 1

…….(2.18)

Where the various parameter are governed by same restriction as mentioned in (2.2)

MELLIN AND LAPLACE TRANSFORM OF THE DISTRIBUTION

By definition of Mellin transform is

  

0 2 ) 1 (

)

(

)

(

X m

dX

X

f

X

X

f

M

         s r q p s r s r q p s r m

b

b

a

a

m

RB

b

b

a

a

m

m

RB

B

G

G

,...,

,...,

,

2

1

,...,

,....,

,

2

1

2

1

1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 1 1 1 , , 1 2 ) 1 (

 …….(2.19)

By definition of Laplace transform is

(7)

 

   

 

 

s r q

p s r

s r q

p s r

b

b

a

a

m

RB

B

b

b

a

a

m

T

B

R

T

B

X

f

L

G

G

,...,

,...,

,

2

1

,...,

,....,

,

2

1

1 1 1

1 ,

, 1

1 1 1

1 ,

, 1

 

Where

2

1

)

min

Re(

,

2

1

)

Re(

m

b

j

m

0

Re

)

Re(

)

Re(

,

0

)

Re(

B

B

R

B

T

=0, elsewhere ………….(2.20)

Special function of statistical distributions.

 

T

X

E

etr

XT

,

E

 

X

r

.

Variance

M

f

 

X

,

L

f

 

X

are defined already through equation (2.10),(2.12),(2.14),(2.17),(2.19),(2.20) respectively.

TABLE 1

 

( )

2 ) 1 ( ) ( ) 1 (

1

a

m a X

R tr

R

a

m

X

e

X

f

   

Where

,

Re(

1

)

0

,

0

2

1

)

Re(

a

m

R

X

X

 

T

X

E

etr

 

XT

 

r

X

E

 

a

a

R

I

T

R

I

 

 

 

a

a

R

I

T

R

I

 

 

a

m

R

I

r

a

m

r

Variance=

E

 

X

2

E

 

X

2

M

f

 

X

L

f

 

X

2 1 2

)

(

)

1

(

2

 

a

m

R

I

a

m

a

m

R

I

a

m

a

m

R

I

m

s

a

m

m s

  

2

1

2

1

) (

) (

)

(

a a

R

I

T

R

I

 

 

 

(8)

 

2 ) 1 ( ) 1 (

2

1

 

 

 

m X R tr

R

I

m

m

e

X

f

0

,

0

)

Re(

:

I

R

X

X

Where

 

T

X

E

etr

 

XT

 

r

X

E

2 ) 1 ( 2 ) 1 (    

m m

R

I

T

R

I

2 ) 1 ( 2 ) 1 (    

m m

R

I

T

R

I

 

2

1

2

1

m

m

R

I

r

m

m

r

Variance=

E

 

X

2

E

 

X

2

M

f

 

X

L

f

 

X

2 1 2

2

1

1

2

1

2

1

2

2

1

 

 

 

m

m

R

I

m

m

m

m

R

I

m

m

 

 

  

2

1

2 1

m

m

R

I

s

m

m s                

2 1 2 1

)

(

m m

R

I

T

R

I

TABLE 3

 

2 1 2 ) 1 ( 2

2

2

1

2

n m n n

T

n

m

X

T

etr

X

X

f



   

For

X

X

0

,

T

0

,

m

n

 

T

X

E

etr

 

XT

 

r

X

E

2 2 1

2

n n

s

iT

s

  

2 2 1

2

n n

s

T

s

  

 

2

2

2

n

m

s

r

n

m

r r Variance=

 

2

 

2

X

E

X

E

M

f

 

X

L

f

 

X

2 1 1 2 2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

 

 

n

m

s

n

m

n

m

s

n

m

   

2

2

1

2

2

2 1 2 1

n

m

s

m

s

n

m

m s m s 2 2 1

2

n n

s

T

(9)

References

1. Mathai A.M. and Saxena R.K.(1966): on a generalized hypergeometric distribution,Metrika,11,127-132 2. Saxena R.K. and Mishra K.N.(1991):A generalized Probability

Distribution,Mat.Aacd.Math;India(Gorakhpur) Vol:9

3. Sethi P.L. and Poonam(1992):use of unsymmetric fractional integral operations in Weber-Orr transforms,Proc.Nat.Acad,Sci.,India,Part-A, Vol.62

4. Mathai A.M. and Saxena R.K.(1978): The H-function with applications in statistics and other disciplines, Wiley Eastern limited, New Delhi, India

References

Related documents

Le deuil est une experience unique, propre chacun, qui comporte chez le parapl~gique des caract~ristiques particuli~res et un rap- port direct avec le v~cu g~nito-sexuel

The National White Collar Crime Centre’s Research and Training Institute (1996) defines white collar crimes as ‘illegal or unethical acts that violates fiduciary

limited bibliometric data from 91 scientific publications from Web of Science (WoS), we argue that despite the broad discussion in the literature, the notion of how

over the country, and a majority of states experi- enced a decline from 1974 both in numbers and rates. The one outstanding exception to the usual level among the states is Utah;

The importance of this research arises from this point, as it aims to cover the gap by analyzing this relationship between logistics performance indicator and its

The application of established and accepted techniques to the constructed dataset will show a negative correlation between trade volatility and financial openness; thus,

legislators did not receive higher vote percentages than non-clergy or mainline Protestant clergy. However, they did win with higher vote margins than

However, the resolved trans (+)-R, R analogue (DAT IC50 = 0.46 nM) had a high binding affinity much greater than GBR 12909 and its unhydroxylated parent piperidine compound and