Asset Management Plan

(1)

Prepared by: AECOM

55 Cedar Pointe Drive, Suite 620 705 721 9222 tel Barrie, ON, Canada L4N 5R7 705 734 0764 fax www.aecom.com

Project Number: 60304937

Date:

January, 2014

Corporation of the Town of Innisfil

(2)

Statement of Qualifications and Limitations

The attached Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. (“Consultant”) for the benefit of the client (“Client”) in accordance with the agreement between Consultant and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the “Agreement”).

The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the “Information”):

is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the “Limitations”);

represents Consultant’s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports;

may be based on information provided to Consultant which has not been independently verified;

has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited

testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time.

Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information. Consultant accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared and, in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, is not responsible for any variability in such conditions, geographically or over time.

Consultant agrees that the Report represents its professional judgement as described above and that the Information has been prepared for the specific purpose and use described in the Report and the

Agreement, but Consultant makes no other representations, or any guarantees or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to the Report, the Information or any part thereof.

Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any estimates or opinions regarding probable construction costs or construction schedule provided by Consultant represent Consultant’s professional judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Since Consultant has no control over market or economic conditions, prices for construction labour, equipment or materials or bidding procedures, Consultant, its directors, officers and employees are not able to, nor do they, make any representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to such estimates or opinions, or their variance from actual construction costs or schedules, and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising therefrom or in any way related thereto. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk.

Except (1) as agreed to in writing by Consultant and Client; (2) as required by-law; or (3) to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Client.

Consultant accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to parties other than Client who may obtain access to the Report or the Information for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report or any of the

Information (“improper use of the Report”), except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of Consultant to use and rely upon the Report and the Information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use.

This Statement of Qualifications and Limitations is attached to and forms part of the Report and any use of the Report is subject to the terms hereof.

(3)

January 20, 2014 Andrew Campbell Director of Infrastructure Town of Innisfil 2101 Innisfil Beach Rd. Innisfil, ON L96 1A1 Dear Mr. Campbell: Project No: 60304937

Regarding: Asset Management Plan

We are pleased to provide an electronic copy of the Asset Management Plan, dated January 2014. The report has been developed in accordance with provisional guidelines and

requirements under the Municipal Infrastructure Initiative Program (MIII). Hard copies will also be provided.

The Asset Management Plan has been established to enable the Town to make the best possible decisions regarding the building, operating, maintenance, renewing, replacing and disposing of infrastructure assets. The Asset Management Plan is broken into four key steps consisting of: status of the base infrastructure, desired levels of service, asset management strategy and financing strategy.

General recommendations of the asset management strategy and financing strategy would be as follows:

Develop 10-yr capital plan and 20-yr revenue and expenditure forecast to predict future funding needs and potential shortfalls

Asset Inventory Development and Facility Inspections Develop Conservation Program

Implement Preventative Maintenance Program

Develop a CCTV Inspection Program and a Leak Detection Program

(4)

If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the undersigned at 705-797-3277.

Sincerely,

AECOM Canada Ltd.

Randy Provencal, P. Eng. Branch Manager

RP:ls Encl.

(5)

Distribution List

# of Hard Copies

PDF Required Association / Company Name

1 Yes Andrew Campbell / Town of Innisfil

Revision Log

Revision # Revised By Date Issue / Revision Description

0 December 2013 Partial Draft Issued for Preparation of Council Report

1 January 2014 Final Report Issued to Town

AECOM Signatures

Report Prepared By:

Erin Hobbs, P.Eng./ Dan Campbell, BGA / Abra Ens, EIT

Report Reviewed By:

(6)

Executive Summary

This Asset Management Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Province of Ontario’s Municipal Infrastructure Initiative (MIII) to create a sustainable plan for the Town’s infrastructure assets, including water services, wastewater services, stormwater management and road services. The Asset

Management Plan, has been developed based on the best available data at the time of the Plan’s

development. This Asset Management Plan will be a living document that will assist the Town of Innisfil to make the best possible decisions regarding the building, operating, maintenance, renewing, replacing and disposing of infrastructure assets.

The Asset Management Plan is broken into four key steps consisting of:

State of the Local Infrastructure - asset inventory, historical and replacement cost valuation, age

distribution, asset condition summary

Desired Levels of Service - definition of levels of service through performance measures, targets

and timeframes

Asset Management Strategy - summary of planned actions, including: non-infrastructure solutions;

maintenance, renewal/rehabilitation, replacement and disposal activities.

Financing Strategy - yearly expenditure forecasts for non-infrastructure solutions, maintenance,

renewal/rehabilitation, replacement and disposal activities, actual expenditures from previous years, breakdown of revenue and identification of any funding shortfall.

The Town’s assets, total replacement costs and average annual lifecycle needs are summarized as follows:

Table E-1 Infrastructure Summary Replacement Cost Valuation

Asset Class Quantity 2013 Replacement Cost

Estimate Water Services

Watermains 184.6 km $80,113,785

Hydrants 970 $3,784,940

Valves 1232 $4,555,849

Surface Water Treatment Plant 1 $28,693,000

Groundwater Wells 14 $1,859,000

Storage Reservoirs 12 $4,570,000

Booster / Pumping Stations 12 $12,013,500

Total Water Services $135,590,074

Wastewater Services

Sanitary Sewers and Manholes 110.5 km , 1414 manholes $39,888,213

Sanitary Forcemains 9,926 m $3,910,700

Pumping Stations 8 $7,970,500

Water Pollution Control Plants 2 $51,282,380

(7)

Asset Class Quantity 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate

Stormwater Management

Storm Sewers and Manholes 57 km, 771 manholes $38,029,440

Catch Basins 1677 $4,814,013

Ponds 41 $4,660,556

Total Stormwater Management $47,504,009

Road Services Roadway Surface 365.63 km $435,897,852 Bridges 14 $14,992,011 Culverts (3.0m + Span) 15 $8,677,325 Streetlights 3054 $4,891,805 Traffic Signals 15 $1,977,000

Total Road Services $466,445,993

Total $752,591,869

(8)

Table E-2 Average Annual Lifecycle Need

Asset Type Annual Need

Stormwater $742, 200

Roads $2,860,000

Streetlights and Traffic Signals $286,000

Bridges and Culverts $418,900

Water $2,682,800

Wastewater $2,420,800

Total $9,410,700

As the Town’s assets inventory continues to change with the addition of new assets, replacement or decommissioning of old assets, the Asset Management Plan should be a living document. It is necessary to update components of the plan to reflect these inventory changes, the changing condition of inventory assets, legislative changes, funding changes, and changes to the Town’s levels of service or way of doing business. For these reasons, to ensure the asset management plan will continue to assist the Town in the futre with making make the best possible decisions regarding the building, operating, maintenance, renewing, replacing and disposing of infrastructure assets, the plan should be reviewed and updated every year.

General next steps for improving upon this living document, the first draft of the asset management plan, include the following:

Develop 10-yr capital plan and 20-yr revenue and expenditure forecast to predict future funding needs and potential shortfalls

Asset Inventory Development and Facility Inspections Develop Conservation Program

Implement Preventative Maintenance Program

Develop a CCTV Inspection Program and a Leak Detection Program

(9)

List of Figures

Figure E-1 Summary of Infrastructure Asset Values ... iii

Figure 1-1 Town of Innisfil Strategic Plan ... 1

Figure 1-2 Plan – Do – Check – Act Cycle ... 3

Figure 2-1 Summary of Infrastructure Assets for Water Services, Wastewater Services and Roads Services ... 4

Figure 2-2 Summary of Water Services Assets ... 5

Figure 2-3 Breakdown of Watermain Inventory by Material ... 7

Figure 2-4 Water Services Summary Replacement Cost Valuation ... 20

Figure 2-5 Age Distribution of Water Service Assets ... 21

Figure 2-6 Distribution of Expected Service Life Consumed ... 22

Figure 2-7 Condition Distribution of Water Service Assets ... 23

Figure 2-8 Summary of Wastewater Services Assets ... 24

Figure 2-9 Breakdown of Sanitary Sewer by Material ... 25

Figure 2-10 Breakdown of Sanitary Forcemain by Material ... 26

Figure 2-11 Summary of Wastewater Services Asset Values ... 31

Figure 2-12 Age Distribution of Wastewater Service Assets ... 32

Figure 2-13 Distribution of ESL Expired ... 33

Figure 2-14 Condition Distribution of Wastewater Assets... 34

Figure 2-15 Summary of Stormwater Assets... 35

Figure 2-16 Breakdown of Sanitary Sewer by Material ... 37

Figure 2-17 Summary of Stormwater Asset Values... 45

Figure 2-18 Age Distribution of Stormwater Assets ... 46

Figure 2-19 Distribution of ESL Expired ... 47

Figure 2-20 Condition Distribution of Wastewater Assets... 48

Figure 2-21 Summary of Stormwater Assets... 49

Figure 2-22 Breakdown of Road System by Function (Lane Kilometres) ... 51

Figure 2-23 Breakdown of Road System by Surface Type (Lane Kilometres) ... 52

Figure 2-24 Breakdown of Road Services Replacement Values by Asset Type ... 54

Figure 2-25 Age Distribution of Roads ... 57

Figure 2-26 Age Distribution of Bridges & Culverts ... 58

Figure 2-27 Age Distribution of Traffic Signals ... 59

Figure 2-28 Age as a Proportion of Expected Useful Life for Road Base ... 60

Figure 2-29 Age as a Proportion of Expected Useful Life for Road Surface ... 61

Figure 2-30 Age as a Proportion of Expected Useful Life for Bridges and Culverts ... 61

Figure 2-31 Age as a Proportion of Expected Useful Life for Traffic Signals ... 62

Figure 2-32 Road Asset Condition ... 63

Figure 2-33 Bridge and Culvert Asset Condition ... 65

Figure 2-34 Traffic Signal Asset Condition ... 66

Figure 3-1 Level of Service Hierarchy ... 68

Figure 4-1 Accumulation of Costs Over an Asset’s Life ... 90

(12)

Figure 4-3 Forecasted Water Operating and Maintenance Costs... 101

Figure 4-4 20 Year Investment Profile for Watermain, Valves and Hydrants ... 102

Figure 4-5 Forecasted Wastewater Operations and Maintenance Costs ... 106

Figure 4-6 20 Year Investment Profile for Sanitary Forcemains and Sewers... 107

Figure 4-7 Forecasted Roads Services Operations and Maintenance Costs... 112

Figure 4-8 20 Year Investment Profile for Stormwater Sewers ... 113

Figure 4-9 Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Needs for Roads Networks per year (2014-2024) ... 117

List of Tables

Table E-1 Infrastructure Summary Replacement Cost Valuation ...ii

Table E-2 Average Annual Lifecycle Need ...iv

Table 2-1 Watermain Inventory... 6

Table 2-2 Fire Hydrant Inventory ... 7

Table 2-3 Valve Inventory ... 8

Table 2-4 Groundwater Wells ... 9

Table 2-5 Storage Reservoirs ... 10

Table 2-6 Booster Stations ... 11

Table 2-7 Expected Service Lives ... 12

Table 2-8 Watermain Unit Replacement Cost Estimates ... 12

Table 2-9 Watermains Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation... 13

Table 2-10 Hydrant Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation ... 13

Table 2-11 Valve Unit Costs ... 14

Table 2-12 Valve Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation... 15

Table 2-13 Well Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation ... 16

Table 2-14 Storage Reservoirs Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation ... 17

Table 2-15 Booster / Pumping Stations Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation ... 18

Table 2-16 Water Services Summary Replacement Cost Valuation ... 19

Table 2-18 Condition According to %ESL Expired ... 22

Table 2-19 Sanitary Sewer Inventory ... 24

Table 2-20 Sanitary Forcemain Inventory ... 26

Table 2-21 Sanitary Manhole Inventory ... 27

Table 2-22 Pumping Station Inventory ... 27

Table 2-24 Sanitary Sewer Unit Replacement Cost Estimates ... 28

Table 2-25 Sanitary Sewer Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation ... 29

Table 2-26 Sanitary Forcemain Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation ... 29

Table 2-27 Summary of Pumping Stations Valuation ... 30

Table 2-28 Wastewater Services Summary Replacement Cost Valuation ... 30

(13)

Table 2-31 Storm Sewer Inventory ... 35

Table 2-32 Storm Manholes Inventory ... 37

Table 2-33 Catch Basins Inventory ... 38

Table 2-34 Stormwater Management Ponds... 38

Table 2-36 Storm Sewer Unit Replacement Cost Estimates ... 40

Table 2-37 Storm Sewer Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation ... 41

Table 2-38 Catch Basin Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation ... 42

Table 2-39 Ponds Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation ... 42

Table 2-40 Stormwater Summary Replacement Cost Valuation ... 44

Table 2-41 Expected Service Life (ESL) of Stormwater Asset Types ... 46

Table 2-43 Road Services Asset Inventory ... 50

Table 2-44 Roadway System by Function ... 50

Table 2-45 Bridges & Culverts by Structure Type ... 52

Table 2-46 Traffic Signals by Type ... 53

Table 2-47 Road Services Financial Accounting Valuation ... 53

Table 2-48 Road Services Asset Total Replacement Values ... 53

Table 2-49 Road Unit Cost Replacement Values ... 54

Table 2-50 Bridge and Culvert Unit Cost Replacement Values ... 55

Table 2-51 Traffic Signal Unit Cost Replacement Values... 55

Table 2-52 Street Light Cost Replacement Values ... 56

Table 2-53 Road Services Asset Expected Service Lives ... 56

Table 2-54 Road Services Asset Condition Scoring System ... 62

Table 2-55 Road Services Asset Condition ... 63

Table 2-56 Bridge and Culvert Asset Condition ... 64

Table 2-57 Condition According to %ESL Expired for Traffic Signals ... 65

Table 3-1 Levels of Service Summary Statements ... 69

Table 3-2 Levels of Service Framework ... 71

Table 4-1 Town of Innisfil Budgeted Water Operating Costs ... 100

Table 4-2 Water Infrastructure Funding Needs ... 103

Table 4-3 Town of Innisfil Budgeted Water Capital Costs ... 103

Table 4-4 2013 Town of Innisfil Wastewater Operating Costs ... 105

Table 4-5 Wastewater Infrastructure Funding Needs ... 108

Table 4-6 Town of Innisfil Budgeted Wastewater Capital Costs ... 108

Table 4-7 2013 Town of Innisfil Roads Services Operating Costs ... 111

Table 4-8 Stormwater Infrastructure Average Annual Rehabilitation and Replacement Need ... 113

Table 4-9 Improvement / Rehabilitation Measures for Road Network ... 115

Table 4-10 Reconstruction Measures for Road Network ... 116

Table 4-11 Maintenance, Reconstruction, and Rehabilitation Needs as presented in the Roads Needs Study ... 116

(14)

Table 4-12 Unaccounted (+10 year needs) Rehabilitation and Reconstruction needs identified in

the Roads Needs Study ... 117

Table 4-13 Gas-Tax Fund Allocation for Proposed 10 year program budget from Roads Needs Study ... 118

Table 4-14 10 year program from Road Needs Study, Summarized by Year and Type of Improvement... 118

Table 4-15 Un-programmed Improvements Identified in Roads Needs Study, Summarized by Road Classification and Type of Improvement ... 118

Table 4-16 Rehabilitation and Element Life Spans ... 119

Table 4-17 Rehabilitation and Replacement Categories and Definitions ... 120

Table 4-18 Cost of Rehabilitation and Replacement Measures and Needs... 120

Table 4-19 Cost of Streetlight and Traffic Signals Replacement ... 121

Table 4-20 Purchase Method Purchase Threshold ... 121

Table 5-1 Non-Infrastructure Solutions Estimated Costs... 124

Table 5-2 Planned Operating Expenditures and Capital Costs ... 125

(15)

1. Introduction

The Town of Innisfil is located on the western side of Lake Simcoe in South-Central Ontario. It has a population of 32,727 (2011 census) and is expected to grow substantially in the next 20 years (Places to Grow). The Town is committed to making Innisfil “The Place to be by 2020” and in so doing, has

developed its Community Strategic Plan, Inspiring Innisfil 2020. This plan outlines Innisfil’s commitment to improving quality of life; encouraging tourism, the arts, culture and heritage; and providing a nurturing environment for businesses. Figure 1-1 illustrates the Town’s Community Strategic Plan.

Figure 1-1 Town of Innisfil Strategic Plan

Infrastructure supports services vital to achieving these goals: the water system provides life sustaining potable water; the road network provides access to businesses and homes, the wastewater system removes and treats sewage to improve hygiene and quality of life, and the drainage system provides flood protection. To facilitate the provision of these services, the Town owns, operates and maintains an

(16)

Asset Management Plan

The Town retained AECOM to assist with the development of an Asset Management Plan in accordance with the Province of Ontario’s Municipal Infrastructure Initiative (MIII) to create a sustainable plan for the these assets, and thus ensure that the Town has the ability to meet its goals. The purpose of developing this Asset Management Plan is to enable the Town to make the best possible decisions regarding the building, operating, maintaining, renewing, replacing, and disposing of infrastructure assets.

To accomplish this, the asset management plan that follows can be broken down into a number of steps as follows:

1. State of the Local Infrastructure

To properly plan infrastructure maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement, all assets and their relevant attributes must be identified. The asset inventory for this exercise was compiled using data from the Town’s GIS and financial reporting (PSAB) documentation.

Output: asset inventory, historical and replacement cost valuation, age distribution, asset

condition summary

2. Desired Levels of Service

Levels of service outline the quality of services that the Town is striving to provide to customers. Generally, service levels relate to quality, quantity, reliability, responsiveness, health and safety, environmental stewardship, and cost, and are defined to help meet customer expectations. The Town’s levels of service, and key performance indicators were developed in a workshop. Output: definition of levels of service through performance measures, targets and timeframes 3. Asset Management Strategy

An asset management strategy is a “set of planned actions that will enable the assets to provide the desired levels of service in a sustainable way, while managing risk, at the lowest lifecycle cost”.

Output: summary of planned actions, including: non-infrastructure solutions; maintenance,

renewal/rehabilitation, replacement and disposal activities.

4. Financing Strategy

The financing strategy outlines how much funding is necessary to implement the asset management strategy, and what sources are available to fund these strategies.

Output: yearly expenditure forecasts for non-infrastructure solutions, maintenance,

renewal/rehabilitation, replacement and disposal activities, actual expenditures from previous years, breakdown of revenue and identification of any funding shortfall.

Continuous Improvement

An Asset Management Plan should be part of an iterative process. It is necessary to update components of the plan to reflect inventory changes, the changing condition of inventory assets, legislative changes, funding changes, and changes to the Town’s way of doing business.

For these reasons, once it is established, the plan should be reviewed and updated every year to reflect changes in the asset inventory, to refine levels of service, and to update budgets. This can be achieved through the Plan – Do – Check – Act methodology. The Plan – Do – Check – Act methodology is a cycle that leads to continuous improvement. By incorporating feedback from the previous cycle, the asset management plan can become increasingly relevant and valuable to the Town.

(17)

Figure 1-2 Plan – Do – Check – Act Cycle Plan

Create the asset management plan. Establish key performance indicators and targets, the activities required under an overall asset management strategy, and the monies required to implement that strategy.

Do

Implement the asset management plan. Track changes to the inventory, key performance indicators and monies spent as per the format necessary to compare to the asset management plan.

Check

Compare the measured data (inventory changes, key performance indicators, and monies spent) found in the “Do” phase to what was established in the “Plan” phase.

Act

Analyse the differences between what was estimated measures and what was actually implemented. Determine the root cause of differences and what changes should be made in the next iteration of the asset management plan.

(18)

2. State of the Local Infrastructure

The following figure summarizes the infrastructure operated and managed within the Town’s Water, Wastewater, and Roads Service Areas.

Figure 2-1 Summary of Infrastructure Assets for Water Services, Wastewater Services and Roads Services

The State of the Infrastructure has been prepared in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure document: “Building Together: Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans” and summarizes the

following for each of the service areas listed above: Asset Types

Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation

Asset Age Distribution and Asset Age as a Proportion of Expected Useful Life Asset Condition

Within these sections, details are also provided regarding the data sources, workflows including data verification and condition assessment policies as well as general details regarding how and when data will be updated.

Water Services Wastewater Services Stormwater Roads Services

•184.6 km of Watermain 970 Hydrants 1232 Valves 1 Surface Water Treatment Plant 14 Groundwater Wells 12 Water Storage Reservoirs 12 Pumping Stations • • • • • • • 110.5 km of Sanitary Sewer 9,926 m of Sanitary Forcemain 1,414 Manholes 2 Water Pollution Control Plants 8 Pumping Stations • • • • • 57.0 km of Storm Sewer 771 Storm Manholes 1,677 Catch Basins 41 Stormwater Management Ponds • • • • 365.63 Km of Roads 14 Bridges 15 Large Diameter Culverts 3054 Street Lights 15 Traffic Signals • • • •

(19)

2.1 Water Services 2.1.1 Water Asset Inventory

The Town owns and operates six (6) municipal water systems: • Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System

• Churchill Drinking Water System • Goldcrest Drinking Water System • Innisfil Heights Drinking Water System • Stroud Drinking Water System

• Cookstown Drinking Water System

A summary of the Town’s assets within these systems is presented in Figure 2-2. The following tables and figures in the sections below summarize the attributes of the water infrastructure assets. This summary is based on data extracted from the GIS and WorkTech databases.

Figure 2-2 Summary of Water Services Assets

Watermains

The breakdown of the Town’s watermain inventory by material, length and diameter is summarized in the table and figure below.

(20)

Table 2-1 Watermain Inventory

Pipe Material Diameter (mm) Length (m) Total Length (m)

Asbestos Cement 100 282 9,943 150 8,468 200 1,193 Cast Iron 50 43 7,198 150 7,155 Concrete 450 612 19,924 500 1,097 600 18,214 Ductile Iron 500 3,911 4,463 600 552 HDPE 150 1,850 2,170 200 320 PE 200 466 466 PVC 25 63 140,387 50 127 100 714 150 68,787 200 38,540 250 3,992 300 20,404 400 749 450 3,115 500 2,081 600 1,817 Total 184,551 184,551 Note:

(21)

Figure 2-3 Breakdown of Watermain Inventory by Material

Fire Hydrants

The Town’s asset inventory for fire hydrants includes 970 hydrants. Table 2-2 Fire Hydrant Inventory

Hydrant Inventory Quantity

Fire Hydrants 970

Valves

(22)

Table 2-3 Valve Inventory

Valve Type Diameter (mm) Quantity Total Quantity

Blowoff 150 1 11 200 7 250 1 450 1 600 1 Gate 50 5 1,183 100 3 150 698 200 309 250 49 300 102 400 6 450 2 500 6 600 3 Valve in Chamber 200 5 38 450 12 500 7 600 14 Total 1,232 1,232 Note:

Where diameter was not provided, one was assumed based on the diameter of upstream or downstream pipes.

Surface Water Treatment Plant

The Town owns one (1) direct filtration surface water plant producing treated water from Lake Simcoe. The permit to take water is 28,377 m3/day. The plant was initially built in 1996, and in 2006 the plant was expanded to convey water from the plant to Innisfil/Bradford boarder to supply the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury.

Groundwater Wells

The Town currently owns 14 wells, four (4) of which are currently out of service, and two (2) of which are currently in service but will be decommissioned in the future. The summary of wells corresponding to the water system, location, and installation year is provided below.

(23)

Table 2-4 Groundwater Wells

Well ID Water System Address Installation Year Status

W1 Cookstown Drinking Water System

49 Queen Street 1960 Out of Service

W2 Cookstown Drinking Water System

3946 Victoria Street W 1995 Out of Service W3 Cookstown Drinking

Water System

1315 Victoria Street West Cookstown

1999 Out of Service W4 Cookstown Drinking

Water System

3946 Victoria Street W 1996 Out of Service W5 Goldcrest Drinking

Water System

2067 Fennel Drive 1977 In Service - To be

decommissioned in 2014

W6 Goldcrest Drinking Water System

2067 Fennel Drive 1988 In Service- To be

decommissioned in 2014

W7 Stroud Drinking Water System

212 A Sunset Crescent 1971 In Service

W11 Churchill Drinking Water System

212A Valleyview Drive 1974 In Service

212A Valleyview Drive 1975 In Service

W13 Innisfil Heights Drinking Water System

2223 Industrial Park Road 1974 In Service

W14 Innisfil Heights Drinking Water System

2223 Industrial Park Road 1990 In Service

2583 4th Line 1989 In Service

Notes:

The well inventory and attribute data is from both the WorkTech database and Geodatabase. This data was reviewed, compared, and refined against information from the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study, Annual Reports to the Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of the Environment Inspection Reports, Drinking Water Quality Management System Process Flow Diagrams, as well and input from Town staff.

Storage Reservoirs

The currently owns 12 storage reservoirs, four (4) of which are currently out of service, to be

decommissioned in the future. The summary of reservoirs corresponding to the water system, location, type and installation year is provided below.

(24)

Table 2-5 Storage Reservoirs

Reservoir ID Water System Name/Address Type Installation Year

Status R1 Alcona / Golf

Haven Water System

Golf Haven Water PS Reservoir Underground Cell 1 / 1187 Parkway Drive Concrete Reservoir 1970 Out of service R2 Goldcrest Drinking Water System Goldcrest Water Standpipe Reservoir / 2067 Fennel Drive Standpipe 1988 In Service R3 Churchill Drinking Water System Churchill Water Reservoir / 212A Valleyview Drive Concrete Reservoir 1976, addition in 1987 In Service R4 Stroud Drinking Water System Stroud Water PS Reservoir / 221A Sunset Crescent Concrete Reservoir 1988 In Service R5 Innisfil Heights Drinking Water System

Innisfil Heights Water Reservoir / 1976 Commerce Park Drive Concrete Reservoir 1976 In Service R6 Alcona Drinking Water System Alcona Reservoir / 1610 Innisfil Beach Road Concrete Reservoir 1996 In Service R7 Alcona / Golf Haven Water System

Golf Haven Water PS Reservoir Underground Cell 2 / 1187 Parkway Drive Concrete Reservoir 1985 Out of service R9 Alcona Drinking Water System MURF Water Reservoir / 2101 Innisfil Beach Rd. Concrete Reservoir 2007 In Service R10 Alcona Drinking Water System Cookstown Water Reservoir Standpipe #1 / 4137 Highway 89 Standpipe 1994 In Service R11 Alcona Drinking Water System Cookstown Water Reservoir Standpipe #2 / 4137 Highway 89 Standpipe 1994 In Service R12 Cookstown Drinking Water System Cookstown Water Reservoir Well 2 / 3946 Victoria Street W Concrete Reservoir 1976 Out of service Alcona Drinking Water System 2 Storage tanks at Crossroads PS / 2244 Chalmers Crescent Glass lined storage tanks 1990 Out of service Notes:

The storage reservoir inventory and attribute data is from both the WorkTech database and Geodatabase. This data was reviewed, compared, and refined against information from the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study, Annual Reports to the Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of the Environment Inspection Reports, Drinking Water Quality Management System Process Flow Diagrams, as well and input from Town staff.

(25)

Booster Stations

The Town currently owns 12 booster/pumping stations, three (3) of which are currently out of service, and one is under construction. The summary of booster/pumping stations corresponding to the water system, location, and installation year is provided below.

Table 2-6 Booster Stations Booster

Station ID

Name Address Water System Installation

Year

Status BS5 Third Line Booster

Pumping Station

1548 3rd Line Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2007 In Service BS6 Zone 2 Booster Pumping Station Innisfil Beach Road Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2008 In Service BS7 Lefroy Booster Pumping Station 1450 Belle Aire Beach Rd. Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2013 Under Construction BS9 Churchill Water PS Building 212 A Valleyview Drive Churchill Drinking Water System 1987 In Service BS10 Innisfil Heights Water PS Building 2223 Industrial Park Road Innisfil Heights Drinking Water System 1976 In Service BS12 Well 2 Pumphouse

2067 Fennel Drive Goldcrest Drinking Water System 1970 In Service BS13 Alcona Woods Water PS Building 742 Candaras Street Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 1988 Out of Service BS14 Royal Alcona Water PS Building 1045 Anna Maria Avenue Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 1987 Out of Service BS15 Stroud Water Pump Station 221 A Sunset Crescent Stroud Drinking Water System 1988 In Service BS16 MURF Water PS Building 2101 Innisfil Beach Rd. Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2007 In Service BS17 Temp Booster Water PS Building 1610 Innisfil Beach Rd. Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2007 In Service BS19 Crossroads PS Building 2244 Chalmers Crescent Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 1991 Out of Service Notes:

The booster/pumping stations inventory and attribute data is from both the WorkTech database and Geodatabase. This data was reviewed, compared, and refined against information from the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study, Annual Reports to the Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of the Environment Inspection Reports, Drinking Water Quality Management System Process Flow Diagrams, as well and input from Town staff.

(26)

2.1.2 Water Services Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation

The financial accounting valuation and replacement cost valuation utilizes the expected service lives included in the WorkTech Fixed Asset Accounting Setup and 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study. The following table presents the summary of expected service lives.

Table 2-7 Expected Service Lives

Asset Type Overall Life Expectancy (Years)

Watermains 75

Hydrants 30

Valves (gate valve, valve chamber, blow off) 75

Wells 40

Pumping Stations / Booster Stations 75

Reservoir - Below Grade Concrete 100

Reservoir - Stand Pipe 75

Surface Water Treatment Plant 75

Unit cost for the linear system and facility cost data utilized in the analysis was obtained from the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study or the WorkTech database. Historical costs were calculated using the replacement costs and deflated back to the year of installation. The net book values were calculated assuming linear amortization and the expected service lives identified above.

Watermains

The table below presents the unit replacement costs (in 2013 dollars) used in this analysis for watermains. The data was extracted from the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study and inflated to 2013 dollars. Where unit costs were not provided for each diameter in the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study, values were extrapolated. The 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study assumed that all water mains and services will be replaced with PVC pipe using open cut in the existing road allowance1.

The following table presents the unit prices used to estimate the 2013 replacement value estimate. Table 2-8 Watermain Unit Replacement Cost Estimates

Diameter (mm) 2013 Estimated Unit Replacement Cost

25 $201 50 $219 100 $273 150 $302 200 $342 250 $395 1

(27)

Diameter (mm) 2013 Estimated Unit Replacement Cost 300 $480 400 $645 450 $717 500 $752 600 $973 Notes:

2006 Replacement Costs from 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study with the exception of 25mm and 50mm which were calculated based on interpolation.

The following table presents the Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation for watermains.

Table 2-9 Watermains Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation Pipe Material Total Length (m) Historical Cost Net Book Value -

2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate Asbestos Cement 9,943 $506,573 $220,962 $3,042,157 Cast Iron 7,198 $390,824 $181,614 $2,170,272 Concrete 19,924 $16,762,825 $15,380,577 $18,986,957 Ductile Iron 4,463 $2,537,126 $2,018,428 $3,478,102 HDPE 2,170 $586,704 $534,937 $668,057 PE 466 $132,005 $114,404 $159,347 PVC 140,387 $32,350,082 $25,551,713 $51,608,893 Total 184,551 $53,266,138 $44,002,636 $80,113,785 Assumptions:

Where diameter was not provided, one was assumed based the diameter of upstream or downstream pipes.

Where the installation year was not provided, one was assumed based the diameter of upstream or downstream pipes.

Where present use the installation date from WorkTech which corresponds to the Initial Value was used. When an installation date was not present the GIS installation data was utilized where available.

Hydrants

The Town owns and maintains approximately 970 fire hydrants. Based on information presented in the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study, it was assumed that all fire hydrants are identical, with a replacement cost of $3,902 per hydrant. The following table presents the Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation.

Table 2-10 Hydrant Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation Number of Hydrants Historical Cost Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost

Estimate

(28)

Valves

The following table presents the unit prices used to estimate the 2013 replacement value estimate. Table 2-11 Valve Unit Costs

Valve Type Diameter 2013 Estimated Unit

Replacement Cost Valve in Box 50 $2,065 100 $2,295 150 $2,479 200 $3,305 250 $5,165 300 $7,024 350 $8,470 400 $10,330 450 $10,903 500 $11,475 600 $12,625 Valve in Chamber 50 n/a 100 n/a 150 $8,677 200 $9,916 250 $11,362 300 $13,222 350 $14,668 400 $15,000 450 $15,328 500 $15,655 600 $16,400 Notes:

2006 Replacement Costs are from 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study with the exception of 50mm, 100mm, 400mm, 500mm and 600mm which were estimated based on unit cost curve.

(29)

The following table presents the Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation for valves.

Table 2-12 Valve Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation Valve Type Diameter (mm) Quantity Calculated

Historical Cost

Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate Blowoff 150 1 $403 $177 $2,479 200 7 $11,352 $9,519 $23,135 250 1 $4,678 $4,366 $5,165 450 1 $7,579 $5,760 $10,903 600 1 $10,825 $9,670 $12,625 Gate 50 5 $5,633 $4,528 $10,325 100 3 $3,798 $3,110 $6,885 150 698 $982,568 $758,909 $1,730,342 200 309 $654,083 $539,807 $1,021,245 250 49 $193,449 $162,069 $253,085 300 102 $547,835 $454,886 $716,448 400 6 $44,039 $34,298 $61,980 450 2 $19,557 $18,124 $21,806 500 6 $60,600 $55,922 $68,850 600 3 $30,425 $26,010 $37,875 Valve in Chamber 200 5 $40,659 $35,519 $49,580 450 12 $143,666 $121,265 $183,936 500 7 $79,191 $62,409 $109,585 600 14 $188,877 $164,170 $229,600 Total 1,232 $3,029,216 $2,470,519 $4,555,849

The replacement value for the treatment plant was estimated in the 2006 Water and Wastewater needs study to be $25,000,000. The replacement value was estimated based on construction/capital costs of tendered projects for water plants of similar size, capacity and technology. Utilizing the 2006 estimated replacement value and inflating it to 2013 dollars, the total replacement value for the treatment plant is estimated at $28.8M.

Initial values within the WorkTech database were utilized to calculate the 2013 Replacement cost estimates. Values were inflated from the year of installation to 2013. Where available, the values were compared against those presented in the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study to ensure

consistency in the data being reported. The following table presents the Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation. Only those wells that are in service are included the total replacement

(30)

Table 2-13 Well Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation

Well ID Water System Installation

Year Status Historical Cost Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate W1 Cookstown Drinking Water System

1960 Out of Service $30,351 $- Not

Applicable W2 Cookstown

Drinking Water System

1995 Out of Service $83,073 $45,690 Not Applicable W3 Cookstown

1999 Out of Service $34,032 $22,121 Not Applicable W4 Cookstown

1996 Out of Service $32,442 $18,654 Not Applicable W5 Goldcrest Drinking Water System 1977 In Service $41,781 $4,178 $160,500 W6 Goldcrest Drinking Water System 1988 In Service $45,526 $17,072 $80,000 W7 Stroud Drinking Water System 1971 In Service $37,301 $- $229,500 W8 Stroud Drinking Water System 1974 In Service $31,480 $787 $155,000 W9 Stroud Drinking Water System 1986 In Service $141,598 $46,019 $275,500 W11 Churchill Drinking Water System 1974 In Service $34,977 $874 $172,000 W12 Churchill Drinking Water System 1975 In Service $38,738 $1,937 $172,000 W13 Innisfil Heights Drinking Water System 1974 In Service $38,475 $962 $189,500 W14 Innisfil Heights Drinking Water System 1990 In Service $112,901 $47,983 $178,000 W15 Churchill Drinking Water System 1989 In Service $149,593 $59,837 $247,000 Total $852,268 $266,115 $1,859,000

(31)

consistency in the data being reported. The following table presents the Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation. The total replacement value for the storage reservoirs is estimated at $ 4.57M. Only those reservoirs with a status of “In Service” are included in the total replacement value.

Table 2-14 Storage Reservoirs Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation

Reservoir ID Water System Type Installation Year Status Historical Cost Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate R1 Alcona / Golf Haven Water System Concrete Reservoir 1970 Out of service $14,496.00 $8,262.72 Not Applicable R2 Goldcrest Drinking Water System Standpipe 1988 In Service $174,088.50 $116,059.00 $305,500.00 R3 Churchill Drinking Water System Concrete Reservoir 1976, addition in 1987 In Service $31,150.63 $19,624.90 $129,000.00 R4 Stroud Drinking Water System Concrete Reservoir 1988 In Service $373,068.00 $279,801.00 $654,000.00 R5 Innisfil Heights Drinking Water System Concrete Reservoir 1976 In Service $138,605.79 $87,321.65 $574,000.00 R6 Alcona Drinking Water System Concrete Reservoir 1996 In Service $1,021,537.00 $847,875.71 $1,445,500.00 R7 Alcona / Golf Haven Water System Concrete Reservoir 1985 Out of service $33,797.00 $24,333.84 Not Applicable R9 Alcona Drinking Water System Concrete Reservoir 2007 In Service $278,906.00 $262,171.64 $314,000.00 R10 Alcona Drinking Water Standpipe 1994 In Service $389,319.20 $290,691.67 $574,000.00

(32)

Reservoir ID Water System Type Installation Year Status Historical Cost Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate R11 Alcona Drinking Water System Standpipe 1994 In Service $389,319.20 $290,691.67 $574,000.00 R12 Cookstown Drinking Water System Concrete Reservoir 1976 Out of service $25,984.59 $16,370.29 Not Applicable Alcona Drinking Water System glass lined storage tanks 1990 Out of service

n/a n/a Not

Applicable

Total $2,870,271.91 $2,243,204.08 $4,570,000.00

Booster Stations

consistency in the data being reported. The following table presents the Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation for the Booster / Pumping Stations. The total replacement value for the Booster / Pumping Stations is estimated at $12.0M. Only those stations with a status of “In Service” are included in the total replacement value.

Table 2-15 Booster / Pumping Stations Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation

Booster Station ID

Water System Installation Year Status Historical Cost Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate BS5 Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2007 In Service $1,116,817 $1,027,471 $1,257,500 BS6 Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2008 In Service $698,741 $652,158 $771,500 BS7 Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2013 Under Construction $- $- Not Applicable BS9 Churchill Drinking Water System 1987 In Service $405,072 $264,647 $746,500

(33)

Booster Station ID

Water System Installation Year Status Historical Cost Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate BS10 Innisfil Heights Drinking Water System 1976 In Service $287,336 $145,584 $1,189,500 BS12 Goldcrest Drinking Water System 1970 In Service $949,456 $405,101 $6,013,000 BS13 Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 1988 Out of Service $182,853 $121,902 Not Applicable BS14 Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 1987 Out of Service $174,055 $113,716 Not Applicable BS15 Stroud Drinking Water System 1988 In Service $706,115 $470,743 $1,238,000 BS16 Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2007 In Service $474,590 $436,623 $534,500 BS17 Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 2007 In Service $233,684 $214,990 $263,000 BS19 Alcona / Golfhaven Drinking Water System 1991 Out of Service $1,420,445 $1,003,781 Not Applicable Total $6,649,164 $4,856,716 $12,013,500 Summary Valuation

The following table and figure presents the summary replacement cost valuation presented above for each of the water system asset classes. The total replacement value for the Water Services assets is estimated at $135M.

Table 2-16 Water Services Summary Replacement Cost Valuation

Asset Class Historical Cost Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate Watermains $53,266,138 $44,002,636 $80,113,785 Hydrants $2,420,214 $1,264,047 $3,784,940 Valves $3,029,216 $2,470,519 $4,555,849 Surface Water Treatment Plant $28,693,000 Groundwater Wells $852,268 $266,115 $1,859,000 Storage Reservoirs $2,870,272 $2,243,204 $4,570,000 Booster / Pumping Stations $6,649,164 $4,856,716 $12,013,500 Total $135,590,074

(34)

Figure 2-4 Water Services Summary Replacement Cost Valuation

2.1.3 Asset Age Distribution and Asset Age as a Proportion of Expected Useful Life

The age distribution of the various assets of the Innisfil water system is presented in the figure below using 2013 replacement value estimates.

(35)

Figure 2-5 Age Distribution of Water Service Assets

The distribution of percentage expected service life (ESL) has been calculated using the ESL values presented in the table below.

Watermains 75

Hydrants 30

Valves (gate valve, valve chamber, blow off) 75

Wells 40

Pumping Stations / Booster Stations 75

Reservoir - Below Grade Concrete 100

Reservoir - Stand Pipe 75

Surface Water Treatment Plant 75

$0.0M $10.0M $20.0M $30.0M $40.0M $50.0M $60.0M 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 2013 Repl a cem ent V a lue Age (Years)

Booster / Pumping Stations

Valves

Hydrants

(36)

The distribution of expected service life consumed is presented in the figure below.

Figure 2-6 Distribution of Expected Service Life Consumed

2.1.4 Asset Condition

In the absence of physical condition assessment data we have assumed that percentage estimated service life consumed is a proxy for condition. The condition ratings have been assigned according to the table below.

Table 2-18 Condition According to %ESL Expired

%ESL Consumed Condition

0 – 20% 1 20% – 40% 2 40% – 60% 3 60% - 80% 4 80% - >100% 5 $0.0M $10.0M $20.0M $30.0M $40.0M $50.0M $60.0M 2 01 3 R epl ac em e nt V al ue % ESL

Valves

Hydrants

(37)

The distribution of asset condition according to the 2013 replacement valuation is presented below.

Figure 2-7 Condition Distribution of Water Service Assets $0.0M $10.0M $20.0M $30.0M $40.0M $50.0M $60.0M $70.0M 1 2 3 4 5 2 01 3 R epl ac em e nt V al ue Condition

Valves

Hydrants

(38)

2.2 Wastewater Services 2.2.1 Wastewater Asset Inventory

The Town owns and operates two (2) wastewater collection systems and treatment plants: Lakeshore system and Cookstown system. A summary of the Town’s Wastewater Services assets is presented in the figure below. The following tables and figures in the sections below summarize the attributes of the wastewater infrastructure assets. This summary is based on data extracted from the GIS and WorkTech databases.

Figure 2-8 Summary of Wastewater Services Assets

Sanitary Sewers

The breakdown of the Town’s sanitary sewer inventory by material, length and diameter is summarized in the table and figure below.

Table 2-19 Sanitary Sewer Inventory

Asbestos Cement 200 4,943 6,409 250 543 300 86 675 172 800 664 Concrete UNK 153 5,728 200 3,927 300 319 600 1,233 675 97 PVC UNK 3,494 98,396 200 67,182 250 7,880 300 6,342

(39)

Pipe Material Diameter (mm) Length (m) Total Length (m) 375 3,827 400 481 450 2,192 525 2,002 600 633 675 1,772 750 1,291 825 621 900 680 Total 110,533 110,533

Figure 2-9 Breakdown of Sanitary Sewer by Material

Sanitary Forcemain

The breakdown of the Town’s sanitary forcemain inventory by material, length and diameter is summarized in the table and figure below.

(40)

Table 2-20 Sanitary Forcemain Inventory

UNK UNK 4,673 4,673 Cast Iron 200 457 2,775 400 1,477 450 841 PVC UNK 149 2,477 100 299 250 2,029 Total 9,926 9,926

Figure 2-10 Breakdown of Sanitary Forcemain by Material

Sanitary Manholes

(41)

Table 2-21 Sanitary Manhole Inventory

Sanitary Manhole Inventory Quantity

Sanitary Manholes 1,414

Water Pollution Control Plant

The Town owns two (2) water pollution control plants (WPCP). The Cookstown WPCP is an extended aeration plant with two effluent retention ponds, as the effluent can only be discharged from October 1 to May 31. The plant was constructed in 1986. The Lakeshore WPCP is an extended aeration with tertiary filtration. The plant was originally constructed in 1987. A Phase 2 expansion was completed in 1996 which doubled the capacity of the plant.

Pumping Stations

The Town owns eight (8) pumping stations.

Table 2-22 Pumping Station Inventory

Wastewater System Pumping Station ID Location Installation Year

Lakeshore Water Pollution Control Plant

and System

PS1 1236 Maple Rd. 1987

PS2 690 6th Line 1987

PS3 1692 Cedar Grove Avenue 1987

PS4 2298 Crystal Beach Road 1987

PS5 1208 Killarney Beach Road 1996

PS6 2101 Innisfil Beach Road 2007

PS7 992 Leslie Drive 1997

Cookstown Water Pollution Control Plant

and System

PSC 1315 Victoria Street West 1999

2.2.2 Wastewater Services Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation The financial accounting valuation and replacement cost valuation utilizes the expected service lives included in the WorkTech Fixed Asset Accounting Setup and 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study. The following table presents the summary of expected service lives.

Pumping Station Wet Well 40

Treated Effluent Outfall 75

Forcemain 75

Gravity Sanitary Sewer 75

Maintenance Hole 75

WPCP 75

(42)

Unit cost for the linear system and facility cost data utilized in the analysis was obtained from the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study or the WorkTech database. Historical costs were calculated using the replacement costs and deflated back to the year of installation. The net book values were calculated assuming linear amortization and the expected service lives identified above.

Sanitary Sewers

The table below presents the estimated unit replacement costs (in 2013 dollars) used in this analysis for sanitary sewers. The data was extracted from the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study and inflated to 2013 dollars. Where unit costs were not provided for each diameter in the 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study, values were extrapolated. The 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study assumed that PVC pipe would be used for all new sanitary sewer replacements regardless of the previous pipe material. All pipes were assumed to be constructed in urban areas, and that sewers would be replaced using open cut construction methods and include the cost of replacing manholes. The unit costs include the full cost of installation, excavation, bedding, backfill, restoration and dewatering as well as 10% for engineering and contingency costs.

Table 2-24 Sanitary Sewer Unit Replacement Cost Estimates

Diameter (mm) 2013 Estimated Unit Replacement Cost

UNK $361 200 $298 250 $310 300 $356 375 $451 400 $479 450 $574 525 $620 600 $726 675 $831 750 $942 800 $1,020 825 $1,090 900 $1,205 Notes:

2006 Replacement Costs from 2006 Water and Wastewater Needs Study with the exception of 375mm, 400mm, 600mm, 675mm, 750mm and 800mm which were calculated based on interpolation.

Where diameter was not populated the replacement cost was assumed utilizing a weighted average of unit costs by diameter, by total length by diameter.

(43)

The following table presents the Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation for sanitary sewers, (including manholes).

Table 2-25 Sanitary Sewer Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation Pipe Material Total Length (m) Historical Cost Net Book Value -

2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate Asbestos Cement 6,409 $1,314,787 $868,390 $2,492,878 Concrete 5,728 $1,237,276 $806,413 $2,314,325 PVC 98,396 $25,508,299 $20,332,653 $35,081,011 Total 110,533 $28,060,361 $22,007,456 $39,888,213 Sanitary Forcemains

The Town owns, operates, and maintains approximately 9.9 km of wastewater forcemains. The Town’s unit replacement cost estimate in 2007 was $350/m, which inflated to 2013 dollars is $394/m.

The following table presents the Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation for sanitary forcemains.

Table 2-26 Sanitary Forcemain Financial Accounting Valuation and Replacement Cost Valuation Pipe Material Total Length (m) Historical Cost Net Book Value -

2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate UNK 4,673 $1,506,259 $1,305,719 $1,841,271 Cast Iron 2,775 $562,134 $359,766 $1,093,510 PVC 2,477 $522,020 $345,155 $975,919 Total 9,926 $2,590,413 $2,010,640 $3,910,700 Manholes

The Town’s linear sanitary sewer inventory includes 1,414 manholes. The replacement cost for these assets has been included in the estimated replacement costs for sanitary sewers.

Water Pollution Control Plants

The Town owns and operates two (2) water pollution control plants and associated infrastructure. The replacement value for the plants was estimated in the 2006 Water and Wastewater needs study to be $30,700,000. The replacement value was estimated based on construction/capital costs of tendered projects for facilities of similar size, capacity and technology. Utilizing the 2006 estimated replacement values and inflating it to 2013 dollars, the total estimated replacement value for Cookstown WPCP is $5.25M and the total estimated replacement value for Lakeshore is $46.03M. The total estimated replacement value for both plants is $51.28M.

Pumping Stations

The 2013 replacement cost estimates for the pumping stations (except PS5) have been calculated by inflating the 2006 replacement costs to 2013 dollars. The recorded historical cost (1996) for PS5 is higher than the replacement cost (2006), and so the 2013 replacement cost has been estimated by inflating the historical cost to 2013. Pumping stations 3 and 4 have been upgraded since initial construction, and

(44)

hence have a higher replacement cost than might be expected based on historical cost. A summary of the financial valuation is presented below.

Table 2-27 Summary of Pumping Stations Valuation Pumping Station ID System Installation Year Historical Cost Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate PS1 Lakeshore Water Pollution Control Plant and System

1987 $892,614 $312,415 $1,836,500 PS2 1987 $186,060 $65,121 $459,000 PS3 1987 $623,865 $218,353 $2,869,500 PS4 1987 $582,848 $203,997 $2,410,000 PS5 1996 $279,602 $160,771 $395,500 PS6 2007 DATA UNKNOWN DATA

UNKNOWN DATA UNKNOWN

PS7 1997 DATA

UNKNOWN

DATA

PSC

Cookstown Water Pollution Control Plant and System

1999 DATA

UNKNOWN

DATA

Total $2,564,989 $960,656 $7,970,500

Summary Valuation

The following table and figure presents the summary replacement cost valuation presented above for each of the wastewater system asset classes. The total replacement value for the Wastewater Services assets is estimated as $103M.

Table 2-28 Wastewater Services Summary Replacement Cost Valuation

Asset Class Historical Cost Net Book Value - 2013 2013 Replacement Cost Estimate

Sanitary Sewers $28,060,361 $22,007,456 $39,888,213

Sanitary Forcemains $2,590,413 $2,010,640 $3,910,700

Pumping Stations $2,564,989 $960,656 $7,970,500

Water Pollution Control Plants

$51,282,380

(45)

Figure 2-11 Summary of Wastewater Services Asset Values

2.2.3 Asset Age Distribution and Asset Age as a Proportion of Expected Useful Life

The age distribution of the various assets of the Town’s wastewater system is presented in the figure below using current replacement value estimates.

Asset Management Plan

Corporation of the Town of Innisfil

Statement of Qualifications and Limitations

Distribution List

Revision Log

AECOM Signatures

Executive Summary

Table of Contents

List of Figures

List of Tables

1. Introduction

2. State of the Local Infrastructure