THE INCREDIBLE CROSBY
A
History
of
JAZZ
in
America
BARRY
ULANOV
PUBLISHED BY THE VIKING PRESS IN FEBRUARY 1952 SECOND PRINTING MARCH 1954
THIRD PRINTING OCTOBER 1955
PUBLISHED ON THE SAME DAY IN THE DOMINION OF CANADA BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED
Parts of this book appeared
in abbreviated form in Metronome.
Preface ix
1.
What
Is Jazz? 32. Ancestors 9
3.
The Negro
Synthesis 184.
The
Blues 265.
New
Orleans 356. Figures of
Legend and
Life 497. Louis 70
8. Across the Tracks 79
9. Diaspora 90 10. T7?e /drzz
Age
98n.
Chicago ii 7 12. B/* 128 13. NeitfF0r&
141 14. Tfce Crash 156 15.Dz/e
Ellington 174 16.Swing
185 17.The
Sidemen
201 18. Pianists 21 3 19. Figures of Transition 235 20. Singers 247 21. JB<?p 267 Vll22.
The
Progressives *9223.
Cool
Jazz 3l624. Evaluation 33 6
Glossary 349
The
openingwords
of chapter one of thisbook
describe the Amer-ican scene asHenry
Jamessaw
itfrom
thevantage-point ofEurope.
That
pointmust
also beacknowledged
as the source ofperspective
for
American
jazz: itwas
from
there that our musicwas
first seenin its vastness and energy as a cultural contribution ofa major order.
Anybody
writingabout jazz inthe United Statesmust
beapprecia-tive of the early efforts of the
Europeans, the
documentary
laborsof its first chroniclers,
Hugues
Panassie and Robert Goffin, and the creative enthusiasm of its first serious audiences in England andFrance and elsewhere
on
the Continent. 1am
especially aware of
my
own
indebtednesstoMessrs. PanassieandGoffin,whose
booksshowed
me,when
Iwas
acollege freshman, that there
was
order andmean-ing in the colorful confusion of jazz, and to the
European
de-votees,
who
latterly demonstrated tome
that theabandon
of thejazz audience could also be creative and discerning. Finally it
re-mained
forsome
Roman
musicians in thesummer
of 1950 to posesome
of the questions and in thefollowing
summer
forsome bebop
artists on the island of Mallorca to answer others
which
both ques-tionsand answers haveinformedmuch
of the structure ofthis book.I
do
notmean
inany
of this to diminish the contributions to jazzof the
American
critics and the audiences at home, but simply toindicate an order of precedence, both general and personal.
Else-where
inthese pagesI haveattemptedsome
recognition of thespecial importance of
John
Hammond
andGeorge Simon
to jazz in the United States, without indicating, as I should like to do, the instru-mentalpartthosegenerousmen
playedinmy
career.Inthesame way,
as friend and as colleague, I shall always be deeply
obliged to
Helen
Oakley,
Bob
Bach, Barbara Hodgkins, andLeonard
Feather. Finally,many
of the insightswhich
may
be present herewere
gainedunder
the tutelary guidance of jazz musicians themselves,
among
whom
Iam
especially grateful tothe following:
Duke
Ellington, Billy Stray-horn,Toby
Hardwick,
the late ChickWebb,
Red
Norvo,
Woody
Herman,
Lennie Tristano, Mildred Bailey, Stan Kenton,Roy
El-dridge, and
John
LaPorta.Chapter
WHAT
ISJAZZ?
In
The
American
Scene,Henry
James said ofAmerican
cities, "Sothere it all is; arrangeit as
you
can.Poor
dearbad bold beauty; theremustindeed besomething about her . . . !"
The
same can be said ofAmerican
jazz.
On
the surface there is disorder and conflict in jazz.No
common
definition ofthis music has been reached. It resists dictionary defini-tion, and its musicians splutter nervously and take refuge in the colorful ambiguities of its argot. Nonetheless, its beauty can be
probed; itsbadnesscan beseparated
from
its boldness.The
processisadifficultone, as itis in
any
art, and in jazztwo
arts, thecomposing
and the performing arts,are joined together. But ifone
goes beneath the surface and does not allow the contradictions and the confusions of appearances to put one off,
much
becomes
clear, and the mystery atthe center is seen to be the central mysteryof all the arts.The
cortex of jazz consists of several layers, alternately hard andsoft,
complex
in structure, and hard to takeapart. It is
compounded
of thehistoryofthe music and of the
many
stylesofjazz.
At
firstthehistory seems disjointed and the styles contradictory.
One
marks aconfounding series ofshifts in place and person and style.
One
findsa music dominated
by Negroes
inNew
Orleans,by
white musiciansin Chicago,
by
important but apparently unrelated figures inNew
York.
One
discoversadisastroussplitinjazzinaugurated
by
theswing eraand intensifiedduringthe days of
bebop
andso-called progressivejazz.Butthen one looks and listens
more
closely, and orderandcon-tinuity appear.
Americans have long been
wedded
to the boom-and-bust cycle, andtheir culture reflectsthat dizzyingcourse. Jazz is notlike that; ithas
no
cycles; it doesn'tspiral.
Whether
you
adopt the approach ofA
JAZZ
AMERICA
philosopher,
you
willnot find an easy reflection of a theory in jazz.While
much
ofAmerica
crises and ecstasies and even amoment
ortwo
of exaltation has found itsway
intojazz, the history of jazz is a
curiously evenone, chaotic atany instant,but always
moving
ahead inwhat
is foran artform
almosta straight line.For
most of its history, jazz, rejected in its homeland, has hadconsciously to seek survival, conscientiously to explain and defend
its existence.
From
itsearly homes, the
Ozark
hills, the Louisianabayous, the Carolina cotton fields, the Virginia plantations, through
the
New
Orleans bordellos and barrelhouses to itslatter-day
efflo-rescenceithas beenalternately
condemned
and misunderstood. Vari-ously banned and bullied and sometimes cheeredbeyond
its merits,jazzhas led a lonely life but a full one. It isstill with us and looks to be around for quite awhile.
No
matterwhat
the fortunes of jazz,its nucleus hasremainedcon-stant, little touched
by
extravagances of opinion, sympathetic orun-sympathetic.
The
nucleus ofjazz as differentiatedfrom
its cortexcontains its nerve center, its source of life, and here arc its mystery
and meaning.
The
nucleus of jazz ismade
up
of melody,harmony,
and rhythm, the triune qualities of the art of music which, as
every-body
knows, can be fairly simply defined. In bare definition,melody
is
any
succession of notes,harmony
any
simultaneity of tones,rhythm
the arithmetic measure of notes or tones. In closerexami-nation,
melody
appears as a vast variety of things, rangingfrom
so simple a tune as
"Yankee
Doodle"
to thecomplexity of one of Arnold Schoenberg's constructions. In
more
detailed analysis,har-mony
shows up
as a vertical ordering of aBach
fugue, or a tightstructuring based entirely
on whole
tones in theimpressionism of
Debussy. But bewildering as the complications of
melody
andhar-mony
can be, theyare easiertoanalyzeand verbalize than
rhythm
oranyofits
parts,and
rhythm
isthemost
importantofthe three injazz.Before attempting a synoptic definition of jazz as a
noun
(ordis-cussing the misuse of "jazz" as a verb and "jazzy" as an adjective), and of the various corollary terms that explain the
meaning
of thismusic, it might be instructive to examine definitions
by
musiciansthemselves.
The
following definitions
were
made by
jazz musiciansin 1935,
when
their musicwas
undergoing a revival as a result of the then currentvogue
for the jazz thatwent
by
thenew
name
of swing.Benny
Goodman
was
a greatsuccess, andjam
sessions hadbe-WHAT
come
public again. Musicians themselves found it difficult to define"swing/*
by
which
of course they merelymeant
the 1935 version ofjazz,
which
wasn't very differentfrom
the 1930 or 1925 music. Let us examine thedefinitions.Wingy
Manone: "Feelinganincrease in tempothough you'restill play-ing atthe sametempo."Marshall Stearns and John
Hammond
(jazz authorities) andBenny
Goodman:
"A
band swingswhen
its collective improvisation is
rhythmi-cally integrated."
Gene
Krupa: "Complete and inspired freedom of rhythmicinterpreta-tion."
JessStacy: "Syncopated syncopation."
Morton Kahn
and Payson Re: "Feeling a multitude of subdivisions ineach beatand playing or implying the accents thatyou feel;that is,if the tune is played at the propertempo, so that
when
you're playing it, you'llfeel itinside."
Glenn Miller: "Somethingthat you haveto feel;a sensation that can be
conveyed to others."
Frankie Froeba:
"A
steady tempo, causing lightnessand relaxation anda feeling of floating."
Terry Shand:
"A
synthetic cooperation oftwo
or more instruments helping along or giving feeling tothe soloistperforming."Ozzie Nelson:
"A
vague somethingthatyouseemtofeelpulsatingfroma danceable orchestra.
To
me
it is a solidity and compactness of attackbv whichtherhythminstrumentscombinewiththe otherstocreatewithin the listenersthe desire todance."
Chick
Webb:
"It's like lovin' a gal, and havin' a fight, and then seein'her again."
LouisArmstrong:
"My
ideaofhow
atune should go." EllaFitzgerald:
"Why,
er swing is well, you sortof feel uh uhIdon't
know
youjustswing!"These
musicianswere
looking for a
new
set of terms thatwould
catch the beat*so basic tojazz; they
were
stumped
for thewords
todescribe thekind ofimprovisation necessaryto
jazz.
In thesimple, compressed,sometimes too
ellipticvocabulary ofthe jazzmusician, one learns a great deal about the music he plays.
One
learns that "jazz" is a noun, that it is not
American
popular music
(as it has often been thought to be), that the jazz musician is most
interested in the rhythmic connotation of the
word
and in little else.If
you
tellhim
thatsome
saythetermcomes
from
thespell-A
AMERICA
ing of the abbreviation of a jazz musician
named
Charles (Charles, Chas., Jass,Jazz), he isnotinthe least interested. Ifyou
tellhim
thatthere is a great deal of substance to the claim that the
word
comes
from
the Frenchword
jaser to pep up, to exhilarate hemay
nod
hishead withadegreeofinterestbutask
you,
"What
aboutthe beat?"You
will learnfrom
thejazz musician that "swing" is
no
longer a
noun, in
spite of the fact that it
was
first so used in the title of aDuke
Ellington recording in 1931, "It Don'tMean
aThing
if ItAin't
Got
That
Swing,"which
gives itakind of ex cathedra endorse-ment.You
will learn that "swing" is a verb, that it is away
of describingthebeat,evenasEllington'stitlefor anothertune,"Bounc-ing Buoyancy," is a description of the same beat, even as the term
"jump"
is, even as "leaps" is, even asthe description ofjazz as "musicthat
goes" is, even as inthe thirties the
compliment
of "solid" toper-former or performance
was
like "gone," "crazy," "craziest," "the end," and "cool" today.They
are descriptions of the beat.From
an examination of jazz musicians'own
words, it ispossible to
glean the subtle, unruly, and almost mystical concept of the jazz
spirit,orfeeling,or thinking itisallthese thingsand issounderstood
by
the jazz musician himself.The
jazzman has hisown way
of get-tingatthecenterofhismusic,and thushe formulates hisown
musicallanguage. Also he converts the musical language into a verbal dialect of his
own.
In hisown
set of terms, musical and verbal, he thinks, hefeels; he rehearses, he performs; he scores, he improvises; he gets a
beat.
To
get that elusive beat, a jazzman willdo
anything.Without
it,he cannot
do
anything.
With
it, he is playing jazz, and that is a largeand satisfying
enough
accomplishment.When
ajazzman picks
up
afamiliar tune, banal or too
well-known
throughmuch
repetition,and alters its rhythmic
pattern in favor of a steady if sometimes
monotonous
beat, andvaries its melodies andmaybe
even changes itschords, he is
working
freely, easily, and with as
much
spontaneityas he can bring to his music.
That
freedom, ease, and spontaneitybrought
him
to jazz; within those determining limits he will find aplaceforhimselforgetout, orjoinoneofthebands
whose
frighteningparodies of jazz are so often
more
popular than the real thing. It isby
his formalunderstanding of certain definite values that the jazz
musician has conceived, organized, and developed his art. Ithas been
It has borrowed; it has
originated. It has effected a change, a literal transformation; inherited conventions have
gradually been restated,
reorganized, and ultimatelyrestructured as a
new
expression. Itmay
be that jazz musicians have simply rediscovered acontrolling factor
inmusic, the
improvising performer.
Without any
awareness ofwhat
he has done, the jazzman
may
have gone back tosome
of thebegin-ningsof music, tapping once
more
the creative rootswhich
nourished ancientGreek
music, the plain chant, the musicalbaroque and its
immediate successors and predecessors.
We
know
thatseventeenth-and eighteenth-century composers
were
improvisers and that
when
they brought theirscores to other musicians they left the interpreta-tionof parts to the discretion of the
performers, even as an arranger
fora jazz
band
does today.But the jazz musician has brought
more
than procedures,com-posing conceptions, andimprovisation to his music. Techniques have been developed thathave broadened the resources andintensified the
disciplinesofcertain instruments far
beyond
their usein other music.Colors have been added to solo instruments and to various combina-tions and
numbers
of instruments that areutterly unlike any others in music.
New
textures haveemerged from
aconception of tonality andofpitchthatisnotoriginal butis
entirely fresh in itsapplication.
The
improvising jazz musician has a different andmore
responsible andrewardingpositionfrom
that ofhiscounterpartsinearlier
an
andfolkmusic.
The
rhythmicbase ofmusic has been reinterpreted,mak-ingthe central pulseat once
more
primitivethanit hasbeen beforeinWestern
music, andmore
sophisticated in itsvariety.
This, then, is
how
one might definejazz: it is a
new
music of acertain distinctrhythmic and melodic character, one that
constantly
involves
improvisation of a
minor
sort in adjusting accents andphrases of the tune at hand, of a major sort in creating music ex-temporaneously,
on
thespot. Inthecourse ofcreating jazz,amelody
orits
underlying chords
may
be altered.The
rhythmic valuations of notesmay
be lengthened or shortenedaccording to a regularscheme,
syncopated ornot,orthere
may
beno
consistentpattern ofrhythmic variations so long as a
steady beat remains implicit or explicit.
The
beatis usuallyfour
quarter-notes to thebar, serving as a solid
rhyth-mic
base for theimprovisation of soloists or groups playing eight
or twelve measures, or
some
multiple or dividend thereof.8
HISTORY OF
JAZZ
AMERICA
expression of the universal and the particular, the specific and the
indirect and the
intangible. In its short history, jazz has generally
been restricted toshort forms and it has often been directed
toward
the ephemeral and the trivial, but so too has it looked
toward
thelasting perception and the meaningful conclusion.
Much
of the time jazz musicians have sought and obtained anunashamed
aphrodisiaceffect; they have also worshiped in their music, variously devout
before theone
God
and theunnamed
gods. Like poets and painters, they are of all faiths, their doctrines aremany;
but they are unitedin one conviction, that they have found a creative
form
forthem-selves, for their time, for their place.
At
the opening of theGradus
ad Parnassum, thedialogue offered
as a study of counterpoint
by Johann
JosefFux
in 1725, the musicmaster
Aloysius warns the student Josef:
"You
must
try toremem-ber whether or not
you
felt astrong natural inclination to this art
even in childhood."
The
student answers: "Yes, most deeply.Even
before I could reason, I
was
overcome by
the force of thisstrange enthusiasm andI turned all
my
thoughts and feelings to music.And
now
theburningdesiretounderstanditpossessesme, drives
me
almost againstmy
will, andday
and night lovely melodiesseem
to soundaround me. Therefore I think I
no
longer have reason to doubt
my
inclination.
Nor
do
the difficulties of thework
discourage me, andI hope that withthe
help of
good
health I shall be able to master it."Several
jazz musicians have read Fux, even as
Haydn
and Beethovendid,
though
perhaps with less immediate application.They
have,however, echoed the
pupil's "strange enthusiasm"; that, these
jazz-men
said,was
their experience,their "burning desire." Following the"inclination," jazz musicians have not had
much
of the help ofgood
health;
some
ofthem
have flaunted their doggedly unreasonableliving habits and suffered the personal and public consequences of
the habits and of the flaunting. Allthis their music has reflected, and
sometimes it is
noisy and grotesque as a result.
More
often it has afullness and richness of expression.
Slowly, clearly, the music is
maturing, and, for itand with it and
According
tolegend,thebeatwhich
is atthe centerofjazz, aswell as
afringe of decorative melody,
came
over totheAmericasfrom
West
Africainthe slave
ships.Thistraditionholdsthatthe
American
Negro
shaped jazz
by
imposing a heavy layer of his native jungle chantsand
rhythms upon
theEuropean
materials he found in the land ofhis enforced adoption.
For
some
years
now
acrew
of industrious anthropologists and social scientists has been hard atwork
tryingto
make
this storystick. It is aseemingly impressive story, buttressed with footnotes, interlardedwith quotations
from
German
authorities,generously sprinkled with the
commonplaces
of academicpreten-sion;itconfirms the averageman's
impressionofthe
Negro
asajungle-formed
primitivewhose
basicexpression is inevitably savage; it sits
well with the editors and readers of the country's chi-chi magazines,
where
this conception of jazz finds high favor.From
thepoint of
view of jazz musicians themselves, however, the theory distorts the
facts out of allresemblance to the true history of the music that has been played as jazz,
by
jazzmen, since the end of the nineteenthcen-tury.
Whatever
its merits as myth, it doesn'tfit with the facts of themusic itself. It won't do.
The
impetus for thisinterpretation, it seems to me, lies within the
musical tastes of the
men
who
make
it. In the case ofsome
writers,a devotion to the music of Jelly Roll Morton,
Baby
Dodds,Jimmy
Yancey,
George
Lewis,andtheirsingingand playing contemporaries, clearly informs the detailing of jazz history.But
is this kind ofwrit-ing purely informative, or is it prejudiced, based
on
personal taste? In the case of anthropologists like Melville J. Herskovits, the highly
placed and indefatigable chief
spokesman
for this line of inquiry, a professional interestinNegro
culture governs the approach to jazz.In addition, that taste for and appreciation of the recherche^ the
A
HISTORY
mote,
which
isthe inevitabledevelopmentofa specializedknowledge
in this instance, the specializedknowledge
of African music hasbeenthe
spurto
some
questionableactivityinthefieldofjazzhistory,and to
some
curious, unmusical identifications in jazz performances.It isvital in understanding the issue to realize the large part that the cultural anthropologist plays in our academic life. Coupling his
re-sources with the genuine discoveries of the clinical psychiatrist and
thelesscertainspeculationsoftheamateurpsychoanalyst,the cultural
anthropologist has
made
vast attacksupon
hisown
world
as wellas
on
thesurviving remnants of antecedent societies.
One
of there-sults is the concept of an African music lodged in the unconscious
of
American
Negroes. "Itmust
beemphasized,"Rudi
Blesh writes inShining Trumpets, "that
Dodds
hasno
first-handknowledge
ofAfri-can
drumming
and music.He
thinks of himself,on
the contrary, asa 'modern' jazz-drummer and evolves all of his effects directly
from
the unconscious."
Much
of Herskovits'sargument
in his book,The
Myth
of theNegro
Past, offers eloquent testimony to the stubbornstrength and beautiful variety of African culture
(however
con-sciously or unconsciously induced), ofwhich
theNegro
anywhere,as direct inheritor, and the rest of us, as subsidiary heirs,
may
verywellbeproud.
CertainlytheAfrican
background
ofthefirstjazzmusicians playedsome
part in their music. But onemust
remember
that theywere
ata considerable
remove
from
"theDark
Continent."The
music they fashioned inNew
Orleans,where
jazzbegan,
was
an elaboratecom-pound
ofmany
folk strains,few
ofthem
bearingmore
thanan echo,a distant one, of Africa. In
Andre
Gide's 1927 and 1928 journals,Travelsinthe Congo, one
may
find avery excitingand surelyreliable description ofAfrican music as itsounds to the
Western
ear in this case anunusually sensitive ear,one trained to apointof high amateur proficiency in music.
The
jazz Africanists offerhim
as an exhibit; Ishould like to
do
so also.Gide
describes a dance performedby
the race of the Massas.He
is
very impressed
by
the natives of thiscountry.
He
findsthem
"robust, agile, and slender."
Watching them
dance, he finds that they have nothing incommon
"with the slow,gloomy
circling inwhich
certain colonialspretendtosee an imitation ofsexual acts, and
which, accordingtothem, always ends in an
orgy." Nonetheless, the dance,ashe describes it, ends in a kind of intensely animated trance:
In themoonlightitceasedtobelyrical,andbecamefrenzied demoniac.
Some
of thewomen
looked possessed.One
oldwoman
executed a solo in a corner by herself. She went on like a lunatic, waving her arms andlegs in time to the tom-tom, joined the circle for a moment, and then,
suddenly giving
way
to frenzy, went off again to a solitary place, felldown, and went on dancing on her knees.
A
veryyoung
girl almost atthesame
moment
leftthe circle, like astone shot from a sling,made
threeleaps backwards, and rolled inthe dust like a sack. I expected spasms and
hysterics; but no, she lay a lifeless mass, over which I bent, wondering whether her heart was still beating, for she gave not a sign of breath.
A
little circle formed around her; two old
men
bentdown
andmade
passesover her, shouting out I
know
not whatstrange appeals to which she
made
noanswer.Butthetom-tomseemedtowake
her; shedragged herself along, forced herself to dance, and felldown
again for the last time on her side, her armsstretched out, her legs half bent, in an exquisite poseand nothing succeeded in
stirring herfrom it.
This is not the kind of
dancing that is
done
tojazz; whatever
frenzy has been present in jazz dancing is
much
closer to sexual orgythantheAfricantrance. Likewise, the musicthatGide
describesis
vaguelyrelatedtojazz,butis
by no means
thesamething;ithasonly a general resemblance tomany
different kinds of primitive music,European
as well as American. So, too, the intensity that leads totrance resemblesa
whole
variety offrenzied folk dancing inWestern
culture the Italian tarantella, flamenco dances in Spain, the czardas
in
Hungary,
and awhole
set of Russianpeasant and Cossack dances. Africans have
no
monopoly
on
religious ecstasy or secular joy mani-festedrhythmically. This is not to
deny
the vitality and beauty of their culture, but rather to give it itsown
place in the pantheon ofWestern
culture.Gide
attempted to transcribesome
ofthe music of the Massas; thenext day, reflecting
on
histranscription, he had doubts and
summed
up
one of his impressions of African music:In thinkingitoverlastnight,itseemsto
me
thatItranscribed yesterday'stune wrongly and that the intervals are greater than our tones, so that
between
C
and the dominant below there isonly one note. It
may
seemmonstrous that I should not be certain ofit. But imagine this tuneyelled
by
a hundred persons, not one ofwhom
sings the exact note. It is liketrying to distinguish the main line
among
quantities oflittle strokes.The
effect is prodigious and gives apolyphone impression of harmonic
"pianos" a horror of the clean sound a need to confuse and
drown
its contours.Superficially, this might appearto be consonant with descriptions
of jazz and the
experience of listening to it. But there is never
any-thinginjazz,notevenatits mostprimitive,thatsuggestsa tuneyelled
by
a hundred persons; whatever delicacies of pitch and liberties ofintonation, thereis neverachaotic
cacophony
such asGide
describes,in
which
not one of the hundred or sopersons sings an exact note.
Inthe same
way,
the description of beaded piano-wires suggests jazz honky-tonk piano; but the honky-tonk pianowas
the result of thepoor equipment of brothels and barrelhouses, not of a "need to con-fuse and
drown
. . . contours."A
comparative analysis of African andAmerican
music does not yield clear parallels.For
one thing, jazz is a measured music, the structure ofwhich
dependsupon
fixed beats, occurring in rhythmicpatterns as unmistakable and immediately identifiable as the pulse of
a
metronome.
Africandrumming,
submitted to themost
painstaking ofauditions, simply does not break
down
into astructured rhythmicmusic;there areshiftsoftimeandpointsand
counterpointsof
rhythm
that
make
accurate notation impossible.As
for the melodicqualities
and quantities of African music, these too are shaped
by
a tonal and rhythmic conception entirely outside theWestern
diatonictra-dition.
To
speak ofthe blue notes the flattened third and seventhas they are inflected against their natural position within a fixed key,
or the alterations ofpitch of jazzsingers or instrumentalists, or their
swooping
glissandos, asAmerican
developments of African music isto talk unlettered nonsense.
The
basic chordal and melodic and rhythmicstructureofthe bluesand of the jazzthat hasdeveloped outofthe blues is
firmly within the orbit of
Western
folk music.There
is far
more
of the sound of jazz inMiddle-European
gypsy
fiddlingthanthere isin a
corps of African drummers.
One
cannot and oneshould not, in the heat of a forensic rage,dis-misstherealcontribution of African
Negroes
tojazz.
Without
look-ingtothemysterious reaches of the unconscious, one can find a con-siderable administration of rhythmic discipline imposed
by
Southern Negroes,whether
of the first or third or fifthAmerican
generation,upon
themusictheyfound aroundthem.One
must
understand,how-ever, using one's
own
tutored listening, that the music they foundmusic of the English and Scottish settlers in the Atlantic states in
the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, of the Irish and
German
inthenineteenth,of the French
who
preceded theNegroes
totheLoui-siana
Territory. All this music,
some
of it stately and consciouslycomposed
accordingto the dancing customs ofthe aristocracy,some
ofit
expressing acceptance ofclassposition and
some
expressingpro-test,
was
compounded
of a mixture of cultures.A
detailedsummary
of sources indicates again and again the breadth, the depth, and the grandeur of theancestry of jazz.
One
can
no more
neglecttheProtestant
hymn
tune than the Morrisdance,no
more
underestimate the effect ofthespiritual on dozens of
vaude-ville circuits around the United States than the
vestiges of African
ceremonial in
Congo
Square,
New
Orleans.These
evidences, gleanedfrom
listening tothe music,
make
clear thatNew
Orleanswas
the in-eluctablestarting-pointfora storythat is orderly for all its academic confusion,
American
because of itspolyglot origins and
develop-ment
a tapestry of impressions and expressions thatbecomes
therichlytextured historyofjazz.
The
long reach in time and space of the African slave tradewas
thefirst factorin that history. Itstarted in 1442, as best
we
can assign a date,when
the Portuguese voyagerAntam
Gonsalvez brought tenAfricans to Lisbon to save their souls.
The
tradewas
reinforcedby
Columbus
ahalf-century later
when
he dispatched fivehundred
In-dians
from
CentralAmerica
to Spain,suggesting they be sold in the markets ofSeville. Voyagers, travelers, admirals, and pirates all
sup-ported the trade, helped it expand,
made
it a vital part ofEuropean
social and industrial life for three and a half centuries. Both
Queen
ElizabethandherSpanish opponent, PhilipII, invested init; the
Holy
Roman
Emperor,Charles V, and BonniePrince Charlieadded to theirriches
by means
of it. Sir FrancisDrake
andJohn
Paul Jones, thenaval vesselsof England, France, Spain, Portugal,
Sweden,
Denmark,
and Holland carried
cargoes of tightly packed black
men,
women,
and children to be sold as slaves. In 1807 the slave tradewas
legallyprohibitedin
England
andtheUnitedStates.The
Danes
had outlaweditin 1802
;the
Swedes
followedsuit in 1813,theDutch
in 1814,Franceunder
Napoleon
in 1815, theSpanish in 1820.
But
an outlaw trade replaced officially sanctionedcommerce
in Negroes:Western
seasstill
were
the graves of hundreds of slaveswho
died en route totheAmericas;high prices
were
stillin
New
Orleans markets, $350 in Cuba,where
smugglers hadmade
them
plentiful, $25 to $50worth
ofrum
orgunpowder
or clothon
the
Guinea
coast.The
slaves brought their African melodies andtom-tom
beatson
the bottoms of tubs and tin kettles.
The
Puritans brought theiremasculated versions of the Italian, Dutch, and
English madrigals.
During
the CivilWar
inEngland the Puritans had destroyed organs,in order to
remove
theseRomish
tracesfrom
the churches and vet.'
prevent taverns
from
usingthem
for profane purposes. But concertsremained popular under the
aegis of Oliver
Cromwell
himself, andpsalm-singing
was
indulged in with an intensity that approachedin-decency. In the
New
Englandtowns
of the Puritans church organswere
again banned; theywere
"the devil's bag-pipes." InPlymouth
congregations
were
without musical instruments save the deacon'spitch-pipe, and psalms
were
sungfrom
memory.
Children's noisy contributions to psalmodywere
silencedwith birch rods, but neitherstatute, religious proscription, nor physical punishment could
cramp
the creative musical spirit.
And
other assaultson
the ascetic servicewere
forthcoming: trumpets anddrums
were
introduced into churches to serve the function of bells, and the jew's-harpwas
apopular instrument even in church.
In
eighteenth-century Boston and Salem, and in similar cities and
settlements, the minuet
was
the music of dancing assemblies andfestooned balls. Cotillions
were
danced to English country tunes.Lower
down
in the class structure, fancy and fatiguing fiddlingac-companied
dancingat weddings andin taverns.There were
jigsfrom
Ireland and reels
from
Scotland and a merriness that oftenwent
thewhole
night through. InNew
York
therewere
longrows
of housesofentertainment of all kinds on the
Bowery,
and an ease of musical conscience too, sinceDutch
Calvinism hadmade
itspeace with the
thingsof this world. In Philadelphia the worldly found their weal in
the suburbs,
where Quaker
restrictions did not hold sostrongly. In
Charleston the
Huguenots
enacted strictSunday
blue laws, butdanc-ing and singing remained integral parts of daily life in
town
andcountry, atprivate ballsand publictaverns, as
they also did in
Mary-land andVirginia and Georgia.
The
organwas
brought back into church in 1700 in Port Royal, Virginia, and ataboutthat time at the Swedish Gloria DeiChurch
in Philadelphia; in 1713 an organwas
installed in the Anglican King'sChapel inBoston.
There were
able and successful choirs in themid-eighteenthcenturyin
New
York
(Trinity) andintheMoravian
settle-ment
atBethlehem, Pennsylvania (the College of Music). In Charles-ton too therewas
a St. Cecilia Society after 1762,which
organizedan orchestra and sponsored indoor and open-air concerts, and
Caro-linians
saw
thefirstopera performed inthe colonies, the English poet laureate Colley Gibber's Flora, or Hob-in-the-Well. In Philadelphia
Francis Hopkinson,
who
signed the Declaration of Independence,represented
New
Jersey intheContinental Congress, andaschairman of theNavy
Board probably designed theAmerican
flag,became
thefirst
known
nativeAmerican
composer. His lovelysong,
"My
Days
Have
Been soWondrous
Free,"was
a hit in 1759.And
two
yearslater
Newark-born
JamesLyon
collected psalmtunes for the
Presby-terian church of
which
hewas
aclergyman, and added
some
of hisown
composition.That
collection,named
Urania after the heavenlyVenus
andmuse
ofastronomy, establishedLyon
asthesecondAmer-ican composer. In all the thirteen colonies
part-singing and harpsi-chord playing
were growing
in popularity.A
secularspirit joined to patriotism
emerged
in thenew
music."Yankee
Doodle,"originally a French-and-Indian-War song
prob-ably designed asa British gibeattheshabby
American
soldier,under-went
countless variations after itwas
proudly appropriatedby
theRevolutionists. In 1778 Francis
Hopkinson wrote
"The
Battle oftheKegs,"asatiricalsongbased
on
anincident inPhiladelphia duringtheRevolution, and there
were
innumerablesongs dealing with the
more
serious battles, the Boston
Tea
Party, and the Revolutionary heroes.Afterthe
war
patrioticsongs signalized theemotional andintellectualrealization ofsovereignty. "Hail, Columbia,"
by
Francis Hopkinson'sson
Joseph,
was
written in 1798 to appease both political factions inthe first
presidential administration ("Firm united let us be, Rally-ingaround ourLiberty").
"The
Star-Spangled Banner," written dur-ing theWar
of 1812by
Francis ScottKey
while hewas
detainedon
a British
frigate during the night
bombardment
of Baltimore's FortMcHenry,
was
inspiredby
the resistance of theAmerican
garrison andthesightofthe flagstillunfurledand
waving
atdawn. "America"
("My
Country,'TisofThee") was
writtenin 1831by
Samuel
FrancisSmith to a tune he had found in a
German
musicbook
hewas
un-aware thatthe British had used it for"God
Save the King."While
many
artA
similar
word-of-mouth
histories, it ischieflythepopularsong, almost
by
definition,which
endures through itsquick adoption
by
themusically illiterate
who
form
the bulk of singing populations.The
Englishballads
were
quickly naturalized in Virginia and neighboringstates.
Moving
through the Southern mountains, retaining an ener-getic rhythmic motion, a touching variety of emotion, and sprightlyElizabethan diction, the ballads
became
other things the blues, spirituals, hillbilly songs.The
ballads "Barbara Allen" and"Chevy
Chase"
were
variously adopted and adapted, changed, chastened, ormade
ribald, as basic strains in a folk tradition must be. In the sameway,
"Oh, Dear,What
Can
the Matter Be?"moved
into the coloniesand stayed with us until it received ultimate canonization as a jazz
song,a basefor improvisation.
"Malbrouk
s'enva-t-en guerre" isanexample ofexportand import trade in music: the tale of this French nursery-song hero goes back to the Middle Ages, can be found inthe chansons de geste, the verse romances based
on
the deeds of Charlemagne and hispaladins,
com-posedfrom
the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries and sung incloisters, chateaux, and marketplaces. In England, Malbrouk's tune,
which
also has medieval antecedents,was
coupled with such familiarsets of lyrics as "For he's a
jolly
good
fellow" and"We
won'tgo
home
untilmorning,"
which
in turnbecame
attractive to Americans.In the United States one of the best
known
ofmany,
many
versionsis that hurled about
by
the voices of Rotary and Kiwanis members,"The
bearwent
over the mountain" and needless tosay the tune
also filtered through a
generation or
more
of jazz.In
American
cities of the early nineteenth century thesongs
were
chieflythose fashioned abroad. Dr.
Thomas
Arne,from whose masque
Alfred
comes
themelody
of "Rule, Britannia," wrotemany
songs,some
operas and oratorios (his famous patriotic song
made
him
thebuttof Richard
Wagner's
comment
thatthewhole
Englishcharactercan be
expressed ineight notes). In America, as in England, his songs
were
among
themostpopularinthedecadesimmediatelyfollowinghis death in 1778 bothhis most
pallid ballads and his attractive settings
of Shakespeare lyrics
("Under
thegreenwood
tree," "Blow, blow, thou winter wind,"etc.)."Auld Lang Syne" was
oneofmany
Scottishsongs to
become
popular, along with"The
Bluebells of Scotland,"from which
hundredsofpiano andviolinstudents suffered.From
been fading annuallysince 1813, but not in
popularity and also his
"The
MinstrelBoy"
and"The Harp
That
Once
Thro' Tara's Halls,"another student "piece" ofinvidiousassociation. "SilentNight," writ-ten for Christmas Eve, 1818, in the Austrian village of Arnsdorf
by
FranzGruber
and JosephMohr, was
agreat seasonal favorite.
The
American John
Howard
Payne'swords
andtheEnglishmanSirHenry
Bishop's music
made "Home,
Sweet
Home"
an immediate hit, andit, like
many
another popular songin this period,was
interpolated inoperas, such as
The
BarberofSeville,where
itwas
sung in the lesson scene. Carl Maria
von Weber's
"Invitation to theDance" was
agreat
favorite in the 18205 and survived long
enough
inpopular affection to appear as
Benny Goodman's theme
song, "Let's Dance," in 1935.
"The
Old
Oaken
Bucket," writtenby
anAmerican
poet and set toaScottish tune, and
"John
Peel" ("D'ye kenJohn
Peel?"), overfrom
England,moved
from
the family parlor to the glee club,where
both havelong remained.In the hills and mountains,
down
on the farm andup on
the river,another transformation
was
taking place, an unconscious naturaliza-tion oftheEuropean
musicalinheritance that led totheblues andjazz.IntheSouthernAppalachians they
were
singing:Blow
yourhorn andcallyour dog,Blow
yourhorn and callyour dog,We'llgototheback
woods
andcatchagroundhog.Rang
tang fiddle de day.In the Southern Highlands they
were
singing "Frankie and Albert"("She killed her man,
who
wouldn't treat her right"); thiswas
tobecome
"Frankie and Johnnie," and later one ofDuke
Ellington'smost
persuasivesetsofvariationson
theblues.InMississippitheywere
singingasongofhardtimes:
Come
listena while,I'll singyou a songConcerningthetimes itwillnotbe long
When
everybodyisstriving tobuy
And
cheatingeach other, Icannottellwhy.And
it'shard, hard times.There
were
tales ofGod
and tales ofman, tales of loverswho
were
knotted and
more
who
were
not.The
themeswere
clear, the musicwas
all around, to be imitated and absorbed and changedby
anew
poet, anew
singer, theAmerican
Negro.Chapter
3
THE
NEGRO
SYNTHESIS
Whether
slave orfree man, theNegro
in the nineteenth centurywas
thought ofas a child,
happy on
his feet, facing misery with a joyfulchant, a Little Black
Sambo
whose
major interestwas
inpancakes,
not panaceas.
But
theNegro
back in the hills andon
the plantationswas
fleshinghismusic with hisown
achesand pains, hisown
unhappi-nessandhis
few
moments
ofjubilation,compounded
ofsensualecstasy and occasional religious exaltation. First
came
thework
song notthespiritual, notthe joyous song.
The
Negro
didn't respond to the backbreaking labor of slavery withajubilantshout.Such
musicashecreatedin thecotton fieldsand inthewarehouses andon
the leveeswas
atthecommand
ofhismasters.As
Duke
Ellington put it, in looking back over the history of themusic of
which
he is such adistinguished representative,
"At
thispoint
we
encounter amyth
which must
be exploded. Fearful of thesilence of these groups of blacks, their masters
commanded
them
toraise their voices in song, so that all
opportunity for discontented reflectionorplansforretaliation and salvation
would
be eliminated."The
bestsurviving examples of thework
song are notfrom
theplan-tations but
from
railroa^ workers andmen
in the leveecamps
and,most
pitiful ofall, the chain gangs.
There
are hollers of the kind thatHuddie
Ledbetter (Leadbelly) brought into thenight club and the concert hall, such as the "Steel
Laying
Holler""Aw
right,aw
right.Everybody
get ready.Come
on
down
here,come
on
boys.Bow
down.
Aw
right,up
high,aw
right.Thow'ay." There
are chantsoftie-shuffling and tie-tamping; there are brief
epics of wrecks, and
of
enormous
distances encompassedby
railroads taking the workersfar
from home.
From
the leveecamps came
theshack bully hollerand the hollerof the leveecamp
"Cap'n, cap'n,you
mus' be cross; six 'clock in hell*
*fo'
you
knock
off." In the leveecamp
too therewas
talk of gettinginto town,
where
a measure ofbarroom
joy and main-streethell-raising
was
afforded the emancipatedNegro
after the QvilWar.
Many
of the songs of the seventies and eighties celebrated thegood
timesintown.
On
theplantation,lyriccharacterization
was
given theplant enemy, the boll weevil
"The
boll weevil is a littlebug
f
urnMexico,
dey
say;hecome
totrydisTexassoil and thoughthe'd betterstay, a-lookin' fora
home,
justa-lookin'forahome." Latertherewere
songs about the prodigious exploits of Negroes,
some
ofwhich
be-came
thelegend ofJohn Henry. There
wereplaintsaboutthedifficul-tiesof
Negro
life.There were
celebrationsof animalsliketheground-hog
and the horse; therewere
celebrations of drinking exploits, ofsexual conquests, and of theinterrelation of the
two
when
lovecame
to be like whisky. Simile andmetaphor were drawn from
the thingsthe
Negro
saw
and heard. All these in later evolutionsbecame
thenatural material ofblues lyrics.
Along
withthe secularsongsgrew
theNegro
spirituals.The
more
kindly slave masters and overseers, feeling perhaps in
some
way
responsible for the plight of their black charges, and themselves of a religious nature, taught the Bible to the oldest and wisest of their
slaves.
As
they haddone
with the facts of plantation and levee and chain-gang life, these slaves, asDuke
Ellington says, "studied the
Book
ofWisdom
andsetto musicwords
ofcomfort andhope,which
year after year
were
handeddown
to their colored brethren." But the setting to music of theWord
ofGod, however
fresh the settingmay
have been to theNegro
doing it,was
not always to tunes of hisown
devising.The
longlineofmusicwhich
haddevelopedinAmerica
from
thedays of the Puritans
was
the Negro's inheritance; he reachedunconsciouslyinto the treasure of thewhiteman's music.And
while the
Negro
was
building his religious music, so
was
the whiteman.
A
comparison of theso-called whitespiritualsand the so-called
Negro
spiritualsshows enormous
exchanges ofmelody, rhythm, andlyric. Earlyinthe twentieth century Cecil Sharp, in his collection of
some
five hundredsongs ofthe SouthernAppalachians, demonstratedthebroadcontent of
American
folksongsand the depth oftheir
Brit-ish ancestry. But later
G.
P. Jacksonin three books,White
SpiritualsintheSouthern Uplands (1933),SpiritualFolksongsofEarly
America
(1937), and
White and
Negro
Spirituals (1943),showed
the equallypoets, musicians, protesters, accepters, singers of life. In Jackson's booksthe borrowings of the
Negro
arcmade
clear; butso too is theextent ofhistransformation ofwhitematerials,andofhis
own
distinc-tive creations. Especially during and after the CivilWar
did theNegro
fashion a music of hisown.
Pressed into Southern armies,Negroes
hadmuch
toworry
and complain about and to narrate intheirsongs.
The
triangle, famous inthe
drama
and the novel,became
a dominant concern: like his master, the
Negro
often left a wife orasweetheart at
home;
like his master, theNegro
often lost his wifeor sweetheart to another
man
herewas
the material of song.And
then there
was coming
home, afeeling as full, as plagued
by
doubts,alternately as joyous and grievous as all the other
homecomings
stretching back to Ulysses.
While
theNegro
was
fashioning hisown
music, the whiteman
was
looking on; and as the
Negro
hadborrowed from
him, hebor-rowed
in turnfrom
the Negro.Our
first record of the white man'sawareness of the
Negro's music appears late in the eighteenth
cen-tury. Letters describe
Negroes
playing their fiddles inMaryland
taverns or
strumming
their banjos,made
of flat gourds andstrung
with horsehair, before their cabins.
The
homemade
instruments of theNegro
are described insome
detail, the tambo, bones, quills, fife,triangle; and so are the
Negro
rowing
songs,among
them
thefew
realAfricanstrainsfoundin America,
most
ofthem
transformed into the dialectand dictionofCreole, theFrench-Spanish patois towhich
Louisiana
Negroes
addedsome
African inflections. In 1795 ayoung
man
named
GottliebGraupner came
to America.He
arrived inCharleston
from
Hanover,Germany,
listened to banjo music andNegro
songs, andlearned. In 1799, donningblackface, he introduced himself as"The
Gay
Negro
Boy"
in aninterlude between acts attheFederal Street Theatre in Boston. This
was
the beginning ofNegro
minstrels and minstrelsy.
Though
Graupner
left his burnt cork be-hind in 1810when
he organized the Boston Philharmonic Society asa kind of reaction
against the "fuguing" tunes of William Billings,
which
suggested jazzsyncopationmore
thanthey did classicalmusic, minstrelsy had
made
a beginning and itwas
here to stay for quite a while.Thomas
"JimCrow"
Rice, a whiteman
witha sensitive ear, heardan old
Negro
hostler singing one of the horse songs of hisa stableyard one day in the
early 18305.
From
this Negro's repeatedrefrain,Rice's
nickname
and awhole
tradition arose:Wheel
about, turn about,Do
jis'so,An
7ebery time I wheel about, Ijump Jim Crow.
Riceusedthesong and its refrain as a kind ofinterlude in
The
Rifle,a play about
backwoodsmen.
Itwas
immediately successful and
was
changedfrom
interlude to afterpiece, and otherNegro
melodies anddances
were
threaded through theplay. In blackface, Rice
made
popular"The
Long-Tailed Blue," a ballad narrating the story of thewearer ofthe coat, a story of trials and tribulations. Later he added
happiervariations onthe coat theme.
To
thehostler'ssong, with all itslyric embroidery, and
"The
Long-Tailed Blue," Rice added studiesof a variety of
Negroes
thedandy, the plantation worker, the
flat-boatman, and the
singer.
He
took hisprogram
toLondon, where
hewas
ahuge success. In 1842 the development of the
Negro
characterwas
still furtherexpandedwhen
Dan
Emmett,
anIrishbackwoodsman
witha face that
was
almostacaricatureofthestock Yankee, gatheredthree other Yankees to play the fiddle, the tambo, the bones, and the banjo,
made
endmen
and interlocutors ofthem
and dressedthem
allup
in that long-tailed blue.The
full-sized minstrelshow
was
born.To
group
singingwas
added a walk-aroundby
the chorus theminstrel-show equivalent of the
Greek
choral ode andsome
of the rhythms of theNegro
spiritualand, later, of the bluesbegan tomake
their
ways
into minstrelsy.DanielDecatur
Emmett,
who
was
thesubjectof Dixie, an engagingBing
Crosby
motion picture,was
the author of "Dixie's Land," bestknown
as "Dixie," "Written andComposed
Expressly for Bryant'sMinstrels
by
Dan
D.Emmett, Arranged
for the PianoForteby
W.
L. Hobbes."The
songwas
firstsung in public in 1859.
Emmett
was
a Northerner and didn't intend to write awar
anthem. For the Souththesong
became
atearfulreminderof the ConfederateArmy;
for theNorth
itevoked distant times and places, the longesttrip