• No results found

3. Pre-design applications

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "3. Pre-design applications"

Copied!
54
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s

7S9X0

Environmental Performance of Buildings

TU/e Dept. of the Built Environment

Building Performance group

(2)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Building simulation – typical application

Simulation >> When?

Usually after the design phase, for code compliance

Eventually during the design phase, for decision making

Rarely before the design of any particular building or after

the building is constructed.

(3)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Pre-design simulation - examples

Product development

Strategy for building concept development

Development of simplified (or surrogate or meta)

models

Government policy target setting

(4)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Product development

Start from lab-scale prototype

Support decision-making and identify potential areas for

improvement

Which properties/characteristics should be changed?

Focus on promising markets

Quantify potential performance improvement for typical

buildings

Identify future development directions

(5)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Product development example 1

Smart Energy Glass

(PeerPlus)

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20

Total energy savings Useful daylight illuminance Glare discomfort Overheating hours

1

2

3

4

5

Rel

at

iv

e p

er

fo

rm

an

ce g

ai

ns

[%

]

PAGE 5

(6)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Product development example 1

(7)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Product development example 2

Low infrared absorptivity coatings

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Normal (n°8) Improved IR reflectivity (n°10)

Pr im a ry e n e rg y c o n s u m p ti o n (M J /m 2 .y )

IR reflectivity of light grey HPL panels

Heating Cooling

(8)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Product development example 2

Low infrared absorptivity coatings

(9)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Product development challenges

Lack of information about the product

How do we simulate something that does not exist

yet?

How to adapt current programs to simulate future

products?

Source code modifications are often necessary

(10)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Pre-design simulation - examples

Product development

Strategy for building concept development

Development of simplified (or surrogate or

meta) models

Government policy target setting

(11)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Strategy development

Assess the potential of innovative building

concepts

Put in perspective current practices in the

building industry

What-if analysis – Little concern regarding

immediate feasibility

Innovation steering, providing input for new

ideas/developments in the industry

(12)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Strategy development example 1

Virtual Natural Lighting Solutions

(13)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Strategy development example 1

Vi

ew

c

om

pl

exi

ty

Light directionality

Complex view,

diffuse

Simplified view,

diffuse

Simplified view,

directional

Complex view,

directional

(14)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Strategy development example 2

Earthscrapers

(15)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Strategy development challenges

Lack of information

Focus on the potential

Use of current CBPS programs

Source code modifications are often necessary

Decision making techniques are usually required

Conflicting targets, multiple stakeholders

(16)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Pre-design simulation - examples

Product development

Strategy for building concept development

Development of simplified (or surrogate or

meta) models

Government policy target setting

(17)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Development of simplified models

State of the art models

Detailed complex models

Require high expertise, computationally expensive

In some situations, simpler models are more appropriate

Use state-of-the-art models to produce/calibrate/validate a

user-friendly and/or computationally inexpensive model

Applications

Regulatory purposes

Building control

Early design, commercial purposes, …

(18)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Simplified model example 1

Simplified model for Brazilian energy regulation

Melo, A. P. 2012, Development Of A Method To Predict Building Energy Consumption Through An

(19)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Simplified model example 2

Solar Chimney sizing tool

Q

harvest

= + 0.345 ∙ glazed area (MWh/year)

Hensen, J. L. M., Costola, D., & Trcka, M. 2012, Earth, Wind and Fire project. Final report - activities

(20)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Simplified models challenges

Define scope and goals of the model

Assumptions regarding the input, uncertainty

Define the necessary accuracy for the model

Simple enough, but not too simple

Managing large dataset, automate simulations

Statistical analysis

(21)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Pre-design simulation - examples

Product development

Strategy for building concept development

Development of simplified (or surrogate or

meta) models

Government policy target setting

(22)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Government policy setting

Evaluation of certain measures on the whole

building stock

In-depth knowledge about the current situation

Assessment of different scenarios / policies

Carrot or the stick?

(23)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Government policy example

Climate change adaptation for the Dutch housing stock

(24)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Government policy challenges

Proper information about the building stock

Role of occupant behavior

Managing large dataset, automate simulations,

statistical analysis

Robustness of solutions/conclusions

Synthesis of results, recommendations

(25)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s

7S9X0

Environmental Performance of Buildings

TU/e Dept. of the Built Environment

(26)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s

Monitoring passive house

renovation

(27)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 PAGE 27

(28)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Monitoring ?

Why?

- Design versus use

- Energy (warm water, heating)

- Indoor climate (temperature, air quality)

- Operation building systems

- Effect different design solution façade

- Effect user behavior

How?

- Measurement in 10 dwellings for a period of 2 year

- Two types (2x5 dwellings)

(29)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Monitor set-up (Type I)

Example

At least 30 sensors per dwelling

[3 minute values]

(30)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Monitor set-up (Type I)

Raam contact

(31)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Weather 2013

(month average – 3 locations)

PAGE 31

(32)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Example result weather

PAGE 32

(33)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Energy use

10 dwellings (gas [m

3

])

PAGE 33

(34)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Energy use

10 dwellings

(electricity [kWh])

PAGE 34

(35)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Energy use

Variation all dwellings district (2008/2012)

Gas[m

3

]

Electricity [kWh]

Type 505

Type 506

Type 505

Type 506

2008 2012

2008 2012

2008 2012

2008 2012

PAGE 35

(36)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Indoor environment

(one dwelling – living room)

T + RH in psychrometric graph; example criteria (PHPP).

(adapted from Climate evaluation chart [Martens, M. 2012. climate risk assessment in museums. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology])

(37)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Indoor environment

(one dwelling – sleeping rooms)

(38)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Binnenmilieu

H0200-lr 8% 0% 2% 30% 0% H0200-br1 8% 0% 3% 28% 0% H0200-br2 6% 0% 2% 19% 0% H0300-lr 8% 0% 0% 31% 0% H0300-br1 12% 0% 1% 45% 0% H0300-br2 11% 1% 1% 41% 0% H0400-lr 2% 1% 0% 7% 0% H0400-br1 5%/-1% 2% 2% 18% 0% H0400-br2 6% 0% 0% 24% 0% H0500-lr 5% 0% 0% 21% 0% H0500-br1 8% 0% 3% 30% 0% H0500-br2 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% H0600-lr 4% 0% 0% 17% 0% H0600-br1 7% 0% 1% 26% 0% H0600-br2 10% 0% 2% 37% 0% H0700-lr 2% 0% 0% 9% 0% H0700-br1 5% 0% 0% 18% 0% H0700-br2 12% 0% 3% 45% 0% H0800-lr 2% 0% 0% 8% 0% H0800-br1 7% 0% 1% 27% 0% H0800-br2 8% 0% 1% 32% 0% H0900-lr 6% 0% 1% 22% 0% H0900-br1 9% 0% 2% 33% 0% H0900-br2 7% 0% 1% 26% 0% H1000-lr 4% 0% 0% 15% 0% H1000-br1 13% 0% 4% 48% 0% H1000-br2 10% 0% 3% 36% 0%

Percentage

Exceedance 25.5

o

C (red)

Undershoot 16

o

C (blue)

PAGE 38

(39)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Example result indoor climate

Living room (left; temperature, relative humidity, CO

2

concentration, window use)

Sleeping room (right; temperature, relative humidity, CO

2

concentration, window use)

(40)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Indoor environment

PAGE 40

(41)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Indoor environment

PAGE 41

(42)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Indoor environment

CO

2

concentration (averaged number of hours per day concentration within indicated band

width (left: Jan-Feb 2013; right: Jul-Aug 2013)

NOTE: these values are not corrected, therefore only

comparison winter – summer is of interest (absolute # of hours generally are too high)

(43)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Ventilation

Jan-Dec

2012-03-06 PAGE 43

closed

open

(44)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Ventilation system

PAGE 44

(45)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Room heating

PAGE 45

Combine information

(46)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Domestic hot tapwater

DHW

2012-03-06

(47)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Gas use

as a function of the monthly mean outdoor temperature

PAGE 47

(48)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Electricity use

as a function of the monthly mean outdoor temperature

(49)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Specific gas use

as a function of the monthly mean living room temperature (Jan-Mar)

(50)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Degree days weighted specific gas use

as a function of the monthly mean living room temperature (Jan-Mar)

(51)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Summing up

Topic

Different ways of visualizing data

Generally interesting to compare datasets

(i.e. not only time series plots)

(52)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Remarks for results shown

Data obtained for 2013

Specific:

H0900 (506) gas use monitored since end of March

(Jan-Mar estimated based on average daily use;

April not complete)

H0500 (506) hourly indoor environment data not available first three weeks January

H0200 (506) indoor temperature bed room 2 apparent offset of ~10K.

Local weather station since March (KNMI data for Jan and Feb; in part analysis KNMI

data)

Hourly data is presented from

1

st

day of month at 0:00: average 0:00-0:30

Remaining hours: average between (x-1):30-x:30

Last day of month at 24:00: average 23:30-24:00

Airing habits rooms: window opening [0: open – 1:closed]

Airing habits remainder: window opening kitchen, attic + fan position

(53)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc e G Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm anc Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0

Explanation shown results

Assumptions:

Gas conversion: 1 m

3

= 9.77 kWh;

Efficiency boiler DHW = 0.7;

Efficiency boiler space heating = 1.0;

Gas use cooking = 40m

3

per year;

Minimum volume DHW tapping to determine average temperature difference: 1 liter

Energy use DHW based on actually measured ∆T

(54)

7S

815

TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 PAGE 54

Explanation shown results

Accuracy:

Indoor temperature: ±0.35K

Relative humidity: ±2.5%

CO

2

-concentration: ± (60 + 3% reading) ppm; (CO

2

sensors were compared to reference

sensor and calibration gas (500 ppm/2000 ppm ±5%))

DHW flow meter: 1 pulse = 0.0001 m

3

(±5% <3 l/h; ±2% >5 l/h)

kWh meter: 1 pulse = 0.0005 kWh (±1.6%)

Temperature sensors: ±0.25K

Energy use DHW: ±6% (reference values: ∆T=45 K; flow=2.5 l/h)

Energy use heating: ±10%

Function f form:

Error in f:

References

Related documents

The socio-economic indicators used for describing the living environment of metropolitan Athens for 1991 and 2001 were population density (citizens/km 2 ), education

„ Hospitals are passing along cost pressures to distributors.. „ Stockless and JIT systems at hospitals require smaller,

All of these (post-baking) activities take a total of 2 minutes per order. The oven can bake exactly one pizza or quiche at a time. Your job is to help your friend Kristina with

Instead of TTT, Rational DOORS NG includes support for OSLC services that enable connections to quality management tools such as Rational Quality Manager and HP ALM through the use

Серед основних хмаро орієнтованих інструментів, що використовуються для створення цифрової навчальної екосистеми розвитку

For the Envestnet platform and Brinker, Curian and SEI, LISI receives a share of the percentage of the assets under management from the Investment Adviser as compensation

The 23 qualitative interviews with hourly paid academics discussed in this paper form part of a three-year research project on academic labour in Chile, funded by the Chilean

There is no research on the associa- tion between ICU nurses’ education and patient outcomes and, similarly, virtually no evidence supports ICU nurse experience and lower odds