Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

RESPA Sec. 8 Enforcement: CFPB Scrutiny

of Settlement Fees, AfBAs and Marketing

Service Agreements

Best Practices for Mortgage Lenders, Insurers, Title Companies and Law Firms to Minimize Exposure

Today’s faculty features:

1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific

The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 2015

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A

Holly Spencer Bunting, Partner, K&L Gates, Washington, D.C. Heather C. Hutchings, Member, Dykema Gossett, Washington, D.C.

Sound Quality

If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection.

If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial

1-866-328-9525 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please

send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address

the problem.

If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.

Viewing Quality

To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps:

• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of

attendees at your location

• Click the word balloon button to send

RESPA SECTION 8

ENFORCEMENT

Holly Spencer Bunting

K&L Gates

[email protected]

Heather C. Hutchings

Dykema Gossett

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

EFTA

ECOA

FCRA

GLB

FDCPA

HOEPA

HMDA

TIL

RESPA

SAFE Act

FDIC

INTERSTATE LAND

SALES

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Enormous Powers

1.

Authority for Numerous Statutes

2.

Power to Write Rules

a.

Carry out purposes and objectives of federal

consumer financial laws and prevent evasions

thereof

b.

Mandate form/content of disclosures

c.

Identify unfair and deceptive practices

Restrict pre-dispute arbitration

e.

Impose registration requirements

3.

Enforcement authority

CFPB PACKS A WALLOP

Penalties

2.

Enforcement authority beyond original statutes

a. Can launch investigations (C&D power)

b. Can bring litigation

c. Can conduct studies, collect information and make reports

1.

Nuclear arsenal of weaponry

a. Including:  Rescission  Refunds  Restitution  Damages  Unjust enrichment  Public notification

CFPB PACKS A WALLOP

(cont’d)

Penalties

3.

Civil $ penalties

 Up to $5,000 per day

 $25,000 per day for reckless violation

RESPA ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

1.

More than 60 total enforcement actions thus far by CFPB

a. At least 16 of total actions involve RESPA

b. Many RESPA actions carried over from HUD investigations

c. Topics include:

 Affiliated business arrangements

 Captive mortgage reinsurance

 Rental of office space

 Splitting of fees

 Referral fees to salespersons

 GFE

 Marketing Services Agreement

 Lead generation/endorsements

 Free marketing services

RESPA ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

2. CFPB sought to recover:

a.

Disgorgement of profits

b.

Civil money penalties

c.

Compliance monitoring and reporting

d.

Production of records

3. Payments to CFPB range from $30,000 to $24.0M

PMI & CAPTIVE REINSURANCE

Civil Action and Settlement

1. Allegation: PMI companies payments to Lender owned reinsurance companies were in excess of risk assumed by reinsurance companies 2. Three waves

a. Genworth, United Guaranty, Radian, MGIC

 Collectively pay $15M  Cease arrangements

 Enjoined from entering into new arrangements  Submit to compliance monitoring and reporting b. Republic Mortgage Insurance Corp.

 Similar Consent Order  $100,000 civil penalty c. CFPB v. PHH

 Civil lawsuit

3. All HUD referrals

Paul Taylor Corp.

Affiliated Business Arrangement

1.

Allegation: Paul Taylor owns interest in two joint venture mortgage

companies. CFPB alleges they are shams.

 work performed by bank and mortgage company venturers

 no employees, no origination, processing, underwriting

2.

CFPB relying on HUD 1996-2 Policy Statement

3.

Taylor pays $118,194, full amount of distributions over 3 years

service provider (other than sale of homes)

4.

FDIC referral

Borders & Borders PLC

Affiliated Business Arrangement

1.

Allegation: Law firm’s nine joint venture title agencies a sham

 email address, phone numbers

 single independent contractor did the title work

 no outside customers

 no attempt to get outside business

 much of work done by B&B

2.

No settlement – CFPB files Civil Suit

 Disgorgement of all revenues

 Injunctions against B&B and its members

3.

HUD referral

 B&B shut down jvs before CFPB started investigation

Affiliated Business Arrangement Takeaways

1.

RESPA expressly authorizes affiliated business arrangements, but

they must be legitimate

2.

Joint ventures are not prohibited, but they are risky.

3.

Companies considering joint venture arrangements should ensure

that concerns from HUD 1996-2 Policy Statement are addressed.

4.

Is that enough?

Realty South

Required Use/AfBA Disclosure

1.

Allegation: Reality South’s Purchase Contract required use of Title

South and Title South Closing Center

 AfBA disclosure language promoted and marketed affiliates

 Defective AfBA Disclosure Statement (font, capital lettering, format)

2.

Realty South self-corrected Purchase Contract

 Now provide consumers a choice: select one of 2 boxes

 Title South or Other

3.

Consent Order

 Realty South AfBA statement to mirror Appendix D of Reg X

 Revise training manuals to inform agents of no required use

 Civil money penalty of $500,000

 Produce all HUD-1s from errant Purchase Contracts

Required Use/AfBA Disclosure Takeaways

1.

Offer consumers a meaningful choice when presenting services

offered by affiliates.

2.

Departure from disclosure formats set forth in regulations is not

recommended.

Fidelity Mortgage Corporation

Room/Desk Rentals

1.

Allegation: Fidelity did not use space it leased from Bank and

amount paid for rent was disguised referral payment

 Rent based upon revenues received by Fidelity from Bank

 $27,000 amount Fidelity paid to Bank in “rent”

2.

Fidelity agreed to cease and desist activities

 Paid $57,000 civil money penalty

3.

Bank not charged

Room/Desk Rentals Takeaways

1.

Payment must reflect fair market rent for the size and space

provided.

2.

Amount of business generated as a result of the desk rental should

have no bearing on the cost to lease the space.

3.

If you pay to rent space, use it!

1

_{Alliance Lending, LLC}

Section 8(b) Investigation

1.

Allegation: 1

_{Alliance provided loss-mitigation financing to}

distressed borrowers. Hedge Fund funded these loans

 1st _{Alliance continued to split fees with Hedge Fund even after it made}

other financing arrangements in 83 deals

2.

1

_{Alliance discovers improprieties}

 Self-reports to CFPB

 Fully cooperates in investigation  Admits liability

3.

Consent Order

 Paid civil money penalty of $83,000

 Agrees to comply with RESPA

Stonebridge Title Services

Referral Fees/Fee Splits/Employee Payments

1.

Allegation: Stonebridge paid referral fees to independent

salespeople in return for soliciting and referring title insurance

business to Stonebridge

 Received commissions for each title order based on value of title insurance

 Salespeople paid on W-2 basis

 No supervision or control over salespeople; acted as independent contractors

2.

Consent Order

 Civil money penalty of $30,000

 Amount based on ability to pay

Referral Fees/Fee Splits Takeaways

1. RESPA clearly prohibits the payment of referral fees and fee splitting arrangements.

2. If an arrangement contemplates payment where distinct services are not provided, it is probably a violation.

3. If an arrangement contemplates payment of a person who is not your employee for sending you business, it is probably a violation.

Amerisave Mortgage Corporation

GFE/Affiliated Business Arrangement

1.

Allegations: (RESPA only)

 Charged fees before providing consumers with GFEs

 Charged more than actual cost of credit report

 Did not disclose affiliation with AMC before scheduling appraisal and/or charging fees

2.

Consent Order (not directly tied to RESPA allegations)

 Civil money penalty of $4.5M

 Civil money penalty of $1.5M for owner of company

 Agree to give AfBA disclosure before making a referral or at time of loan application

 Engage Independent Consultant and provide compliance plan in response to report of Independent Consultant for three years

GFE/Affiliated Business Arrangement Takeaways

1.

Put controls in place to prevent imposing charges prematurely.

2.

Check your disclosure practices to ensure timely and accurate

disclosure of fees and affiliated businesses.

3.

Get ready for TRID.

Lighthouse Title

Marketing Services Agreements

1.

First statement from CFPB on MSAs

2.

Allegation: Lighthouse entered into MSAs with real estate

companies and paid marketing fees in return for the referral of title

business

 No determination or documentation of fair market value

 Payments based on referrals and what competitors were willing to pay under MSA

 No verification that marketing services actually performed

3.

Lighthouse agreed to end MSAs and refrain from entering into

MSAs in the future

 Paid $200,000 civil money penalty

 Agreed to document all things of value given in excess of $5

JPMorgan Chase/Wells Fargo

Marketing Services to Loan Officers

1.

Allegations:

 Genuine Title purchased leads from a third-party vendor and provided the leads to loan officers

 Genuine Title paid for marketing letters to be printed, folded, stuffed, and mailed on behalf of loan officers

 Genuine Title made cash payments to the spouse of a loan officer

2.

Consent Orders:

 JPMorgan Chase

 Civil money penalty of $600,000

 Restitution of $300,000

 Wells Fargo

 Civil money penalty of approximately $24M

 Restitution of $10.8M

 Civil money penalty of $30,000 for individual loan officer

NewDay Financial

Lead Generation/Endorsements

1.

Allegations:

 NewDay agreement with veterans’ organization to be designated as exclusive lender

 Email and direct mail advertisements sent to veterans promoting the exclusive relationship and recommending use of NewDay for mortgages

 Promoted exclusive relationship to members during conversations and website recommended NewDay as a source for home loans

 NewDay paid lead generation fees for each member that contacted NewDay and applied for loans

 Paid relationship not disclosed to consumers

2.

Consent Order:

 Civil money penalty of $2M

MSA/Lead Gen/Endorsement Takeaways

1.

Are MSAs dead?

 Carefully consider/reevaluate current arrangements for compliance.

 Structure new arrangements tightly.

 Independent valuation

 Documentation of services provided

 Keep marketing general

 Beware the exclusive designation

2.

Keep lead gen separate

 Pay per lead, not on success

 Steer clear of endorsements