Introduction
Ammonia is an important nitrogenous material used as fertilizer. Most of ammonia is made synthetically.It is also obtained as by-product in some cases.
Ammonia gas is used directly as fertilizer in heat treatment, paper pulping, nitric acid and nitrate manufacturing, nitric acid esters and nitrocompound manufacture, explosive of various types and as a refrigerant.
The most important field is of fertilizer. Importance of ammonia in this field is due to the fact that it is by far the most simple form of actual nitrogen which can be administrated and the most economical source of other nitrogen chemicals. Hence ammonia is the backbone of Nitrogen fertilizer processes. Its production is the first consideration in the initiation of a fertilizer industry. Great strides have been made in the last few year in the economy and efficiency of ammonia processes.
The synthesis of ammonia from Nitrogen and hydrogen was first chemical reaction to be carried out under high pressure on commercial scale. This synthesis reaction has probably been studied more extensively and is better understood than any other high presure reactions.
The name of Haber, Corl Bosch, Claude, Casale, Fauser, Mont Cenis stand out from those of early engineers and scientists, worked for the development of first commercial synthesis.
In India, till 1948, the only factory which was producing synthetic ammonia was small concern, Mysore Chemicals and Fertilizers Company
Ltd. at Belegula, Mysore. The Fertilizer Factory at Sindri, India’s first major state-owned enterprise, went into production on October 30, 1961. a gradual expansion followed and soon fertilizer plants were commissioned at Nangal (1961), Trombay (1968), Namrup (1969), Durgapur (1974) and Barauni (1976).
In 7t h decade of 20t h century,a revolution in ammonia manufacturing
came about as the reciprocating compressors common at that time were replaced by centrifugal units. At that time, the ammonia
process was regarded as highly efficient, a mature process, but careful examination of the process step by step and the severe economic pressure led to major improvements and cost drop approaching to 50 percent. Some of the important developments are – better catalysts, better converters, replacement of reciprocating compressors to centrifugal units, lone pressure techniques, energy conservation, digital computer control process and the most recent development on which researches have been made and commercial backgrounds are being studied is to commissioned a Compressor Ammonia Plant. High pressure ammonia synthesis becomes economically attractive with this technique of compressorless manufacture process of ammonia. As without application of compressor, high pressure synthesis gases are obtained which have many advantages over low pressure techniques e.g. at high pressure ammonia condenses at normal cooling water temperature, reduced amount of recirculation thus replacing
recirculating compressure by a static ejector. Trend in again in favour of high pressure techniques for ammonia manufacture.
Process And Process Selection
Ammonnia manufacturing consists of six phases
1. Manufacture of Reactant gases. 2. Purification
3. Compression 4. Catalytic reaction
5. Recovery of ammonia formed 6. Recirculation
RAW
Raw material requirement consists of a sources of hydrogen, the nitrogen is obtained from air, the feed stock supplies the hydrogen. The production of ammonia depend upon cost and operability of available raw material for hydrogen. Different raw materials for hydrogen can be –
Wood
Coal Refinery gas
Electrolysis of water Naphtha Coke oven gas Fuel oil Natural gas Crude oil Liquid petroleum gas
MANUFACTURING
The principal manufacturing process that are used for synthetic ammonia production are steam water gas process, the steam hydrocarbon process, the coke oven gas process & electrolysis of water.
Much research work is still diverted to find cheaper manufacturing methods.Many new plants use ethanol amine to remove carbon dioxide from gas streams instead of high pressure water.
Nitrogen required for synthesis gas is obtained usual from an air liquefaction plant. In water gas and natural gas process, nitrogen is obtained in same manufacturing process as hydrogen. Air is added in secondary reforms of natural gas process and reacts with carbon monoxide to furnish carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
Cost is greatly influenced by the pressure, temperature, catalysts and raw material used. Raw material selection depends upon the availability and cost of raw material. If the plant is near some refinery then raw material can be naphtha, natural gas or LPG, but in case it is near a coal mine, one should depend on coal as raw material for hydrogen. There may be some other cases where electricity is readily available to meet the requirements for electrolysis then hydrogen can be obtained by electrolysis of water
Comparsion of processes
Many variation of the original Haber process for the synthesis of ammonia are now used in commercial practice, some varying to such an extent that they are identified by a name, often that of group of men developing them. Important among these are modified Haber Bosch, Claude, Casale, Fauser, and Mont Cenis processes. All of them are fundamentally the same in that nitrogen is fixed with hydrogen as ammonia in the presence of a catalyst , but have variation in arrangement and construction of equipment , composition of catalyst, temperature and pressure used. Table C gives a condensed comparison of different processes 40% conversion of the gas upon passes through a single converter and 85% conversion after passes through a series of converter . gas is vented after one pass through the converter.
Table C : Synthesis Ammonia Systems
Designation Pressure Temp.
0C Catalyst Recir-culation Conver. % Haber-Bosch 200-350 550 Doubly Promoted iron Yes 8 Modified Haber-Bosch 200-300 500-550 -Do- Yes 20-22 Claude 900-1000 500-650 Promoted iron No 40-85 Casale 600 500 Promoted iron Yes 15-18 Fauser 200 500 Promoted iron Yes 12-23
Modified Haber- Bosch Process
The ammonia concentration in the circulation gas leaving the catalyst is 10-11 mole %. In the condenser the ammonia concentration is reduced by condensation to equilibrium at the exit temperature of the condenser. The condensed ammonia is separated from the circulating gas, and the gas is boosted in pressure by a circulating compressor to overcome the pressure drop in the synthesis loop.
The Claude Process
This process depart from the Haber process more than any of the other ammonia syntheses process, the residual gas is wasted to the atmosphere or utilized for its heat content. The large amount of heat evolved in operating at space velocities of 100,000 with as much as 40% of the hydrogen nitrogen mixture converted to ammonia in one pass, called for a special converter design. In his original process, Claude used -+ from the liquefaction of air.
Among advantages claimed for the Claude process are the following:
1. Greater compactness, simplicity, and case of construction of the converter, since under the high pressure used the gases have smaller volume.
2. Elimination of the expensive heat exchangers required in processes operated at lower pressure.
3. Removal of ammonia with water cooling alone, rather than by ammonia refrigerators or scrubbing processes.
Cited against these advantages are the shorter life of converters, high apparatus upkeep in the high-pressure operation, and the efficiency loss in wasting approximately 20% of the makeup gas, which is unconverted. Modifications of the Claude process include recycling of the gas through the synthesis converters.
The Casale Process
Pressure of 500-900 atm are used in this process which is otherwise distinguished by
the method used for controlling catalyst temperature in the specially designed converter. A method involving recirculating gas around a synthesis loop, similar to the Haber process, is used. As in the Claude process, the higher pressures allow liquefaction of the ammonia at temperatures that can be attained by water cooling. The basis for heat control of the catalyst is to leave 2 or 3% ammonia in the gas to the converter, thereby showing down the rate of formation of ammonia and eliminating excessive heating of the catalyst.
The Fauser Process
This pressure incorporates some features not previously mentioned. Electrolytic hydrogen from Fauser cells and nitrogen from liquid air unit or from a purification unit utilizing tail gases from absorption towers in the ammonia oxidation plant are used. The mixture of hydrogen and nitrogen is compressed to 200-300 atm and, after passing through an oil separator goes to an oxygen burner.
In the oxygen burner any oxygen contained in the gas mixture combines with hydrogen in the presence of a copper catalyst the water formed is condensed out in a cooler and removed in a water separator.
The Mont Cenis Process
This process was originally developed to use hydrogen separated from coke oven gas by a liquefaction process, and nitrogen was obtained by the liquefaction of the air. The essential characteristics of the Mont Cenis process are its operating pressure of 100 atm or less.
Mixed hydrogen and nitrogen, after being compressed to 100 atm and heated to about 3000C in interchangers, passes through a carbon monoxide purifier. In the purifier, while
in contact with a nickel catalyst, carbon monoxide and oxygen contained in small quantities in the gas react with hydrogen to form methane and water.
Material Balance
Ammonia Production = 1200 TPD=2941.18 kmol/hr
N2 + 3H2 2 NH3
Let % conversion=20%
Which means, 1 kmol N2 forms 2x0.2=0.4kmol NH3 Assuming losses=8%
Hence, N2 required=3196.93/0.4=7992.34kmol/hr
Air required=7992.34x100/79=10,117kmol/hr=10117x22.4=226621 Nm3/hr
Siimilarly, H2 required=3x7992.34=23977kmol/hr Reaction taking place in the gasifier is
CnHm + n/2O2 nCO + 2H2O
CnHm + nH2O nCO + (m/2+n)H2O
At high temperature,
CnHm + ( n + m/4)O2 nCO2 + m/2H2O
Composition is given in weight percent. C = 84.98%
H = 12.07% S = 1% N = 0.4% O = 1.5%
Composition of gases coming out of the gasifier is given CO = 42% H2 = 51.23% H2S = 0.23% CO2 = 5.7% N2 = 0.18% Ar = 0.02% CH4 = 0.5%
Basis: 100 kmoles or Raw gas CO = 42 kmole H2 = 51.23 kmole H2S = 0.23 kmole CO2 = 5.7 kmole N2 = 0.18 kmole Ar = 0.09 kmole
Now, maximum concentration of H2S in H2S free raw gas in limited to 0.3 ppm.
Amount of H2S to be removed = 0.229997 kmole
In H2S free gas H2 = 51.23 kmole % of H2 = 51.23/99.77x100 = 51.34 CO = 42 kmole % of CO = 42/99.31 X 100 = 42.09 H2S = 0.3 ppm % of H2S = 0.3 ppm CO2 = 5.77 kmole % of CO2 = 5.77/99.31x 100 = 5.78 CH4 = 0.5 kmole % of CH4 = 0.5/ 99.31x 100 = 0.501 N2 = 0.18 kmole % of N2 = 0.18/99.31x 100 = 0.18 Ar = 0.09 kmole % of Ar = 0.09/99.31x 100 = 0.09
Total no. of moles = 51.23 + 42.09 + 0.00003 + 5.77 + 0.5 +0.18 + 0.09 = 99.77 kmol
Material balance across CO shift converter Basis 100 kmole of H2S free gases
Now since 97% of CO is converted in converter
Therefore kmoles of CO2 in product = 5.78 + 42.09 x 0.97
similarly, kmoles of H2 in the Product = 51.34 + 40.8 = 92.14 Kmole of CO = 42.09 – 40.4 = 1.26 Kmole of H2S = 0.3ppm Kmole of CH4 = 0.501 kmole Kmole of Ar = 0.09 kmole Kmole of N2 = 0.18 kmole
Total no of moles in the product stream = ( 46.4 + 92.14 + 1,26 + 0.501 + 0.09 + 0.18 ) = 140.77 kmole H2 in the product = 92.14/ 140.77 x 100 = 65.45% CO2 in the product = 46.6/140.77 x 100 = 33.1% H2S = 0.3 ppm CH4 = 0.501/140.77 x 100 = 0.36% Ar = 0.09/140.77 x 100 = 0.063% N2 = 0.18/140.77 x 100 = 0.13%
Material balance across CO2 Absorber
Basis 100 mole of converted gas
Taking efficiency of the absorber to be 92% CO2 to be removed = 0.92 x 33.1
= 30.45 kmole CO2 in the product stream = 2.65 kmole
= ( 2.65 + 65.45 + 0.89 + 0.13 + 0.06 + 0.36 ) = 69.54 kmole CO2 = 2.65/69.54 X 100 = 3.8 H2 = 65.45/69.45 X 100 = 94.2 CO = 0.89/69.45 X 100 = 1.3 CH4 = 0.36/69.45 X 100 = 0.518 N2 = 0.13/69.45 X 100 = 0.19 Ar = 0.064/69.45 x 100 = 0.09 H2S = 0.3 ppm
Material balance across Adsorber
The main function of absorber is to adsorb H2S, CO & CO2. They are reduced to an
amount which is negligible.
Moles remained = 100 – 3.8 – 1.3 = 94.9 kmole % of gas after adsorption
H2 = 94.2/95 X 100 = 99%
CH4 = 0.54
Ar = 0.095
N2 = 0.19/95 = 0.2
N2 is added in such a way that
H2 : N2 becomes 3 : 1
Suppose x mole of N2 is added
x = 32.80 Total no of moles = 99 + 32.80 + 0.54 + 0.095 = 132.43 kmole % of N2 in the product = 32.80/132.43 x 100 = 24.76 % % of H2 in the product = 99/132.43 x 100 = 74.76% % of Ar = 0.072% % of CH4 = 0.54/132.43 X 100 = 0.4%
Material balance across NH3 Separator
Now in NH3 Separator 3 streams are there out of which 2 are going out and one is making
in the stream that moves in F13 & stream that gives main product is F14 & F 15. F16 is recycle stream moving to compressor.
Suppose the moles of F 13 stream are as follows N2 = a
H2 = 3a
NH3 = b
Ar = c CH4 = d
Now solubility of H2 , N2 , Ar, NH4 in liquid NH3 is given as
Solubility of H2 = 0.0998 cm3 of H2 at NTP/gm of liq NH3
Solubility of N2 = 0.1195 cm3 of N2 at NTP/gm of liq NH3
Solubility of Ar = 0.154 cm3 of Ar at NTP/gm of liq NH 3
Solubility of CH4 = 0.304 cm3 of CH4 at NTP/gm of liq NH3 For F 14 stream H2 = 0.0998/22414 x 17 x 3a x 22 x 298/273 = 5.45 x 10-3 a N2 = 0.1195/22414 x 17 x a x 22 x 298/273 = 2.18 x 10-3 a Ar = 0.154/22414 x 17 x c x 22 x 298/273 = 2.8 x 10-3 c CH4 = 0.304/22414 x17 x d x 22 x 298/273 = 5.54 x 10-3 d
Now we want 1200 TPD production Therefore NH3 production in F 14
= 1200 x 1000/(17x24) = 2941.18 kmole/hr Now for F15 stream
Equilibrium of NH3 in gas phase with liq. NH3 in separator = 5.9%
Assuming that total inert conc. In stream from the separator = 5% H2 + N2 = 100 – 5.9 – 5 = 89.1%
H2 = ¾ x 89.1 = 66.83%
N2 = ¼ x 89.1 = 22.28 %
NH3 = 5.9%
Ar + CH4 = 5%
Ar = 1.43% CH4 = 3.57%
Now applying material balance on NH3 separator F 13 = F 14 + F 15 H2 balance : 3a = 0.6683 F15 + 5.45 x 10-3 a (1) N2 balance : a = 0.2228 F 15 + 2.18 x 10-3 a (2) NH3 balance : b = 2450.98 + 0.059 F 15 (3) CH4 balance : d = 5.54 x 10-3d + 0.0357 F 15 (4) Ar balance : c = 2.8 x 10-3c + 0.0143 F 15 (5) From (5) 0.9945d = 0.0357 F15 (6) d = 0.0359 F15 From eqn. (1) 2.99478 a = 0.6683 F15 a = 0.223 x F15 (7) From eqn. (4) 0.9972 c = 0.0143 F 15 c = 0.01434 F 15 (8)
Now total moles in product stream F14
= 2941 + ( 2.18 + 5.45 ) x 10-3 x 0.223 x F15 + 2.8 x 10-3 x
0.0143 F 15 + 5.54 x 10-3 x 0.0359 F15
η of NH3 separator = 98.5% Therfore 2941 = 0.985 2941 + 1.9404 x 10-3 F15 2941= 2414.22 + 1.9113 x 10-3 F 15 F 15 = 2302kmol/hr 0.0019113 From (7) a = 5133.7 kmol/hr From (8) c = 330.12 kmol/hr From (6) d = 826.45 kmol/hr & from (3) b = 4299.24 kmol/hr Now for F-13 stream
H2 = 3 x 5133.7 = 15401.1 kmol/hr
N2 = 5133.7 kmol/hr
NH3 = 4299.24 kmol/hr
Ar = 330.12kmol/hr CH4 = 826.45 kmol/hr
H = 15401.1 = 59.26% 25990.61 N2 = 19.75% NH3 = 16.52% Ar = 1.28% CH4 = 3.18% For F14 stream NH3 = 2941 kmol/hr H2 = 5.45 x 10-3 a = 5.45 x 10-3 x 5133.7 = 27.98kmol/hr N2 = 2.18 x 10-3 x a = 2.18 x 10-3 x 5133.7 = 11.19 kmol/hr CH4 = 5.54 x 10-3 x d = 5.54 x 10-3 x 826.45 = 4.58 kmol/hr Ar = 2.8 x 10-3c = 2.8 x 10-3 x 330.12 = 0.924 kmol/hr Total no of moles in product = 2985.67 kmol/hr
NH3 = 2941 = 98.5% 2985.67 H2 = 27.98 = 0.94% 2905.67 N2 = 11.19 = 0.38% 2985.67 CH4 = 4.58 = 0.15% 2985.67 Ar = 0.924 = 0.03% 2985.67
Material balance across NH3 converter
Suppose in F12 stream N2 = x kmole H2 = y kmole NH3 = z kmole Assuming 20% conversion For N2 balance X [1 – 0.2] = 5133.7 X = N2 = 6417.125 kmol/hr H2 = 3 x 6417.125 = 19251.4 kmol/hr NH3 formed = 2 x 0.2 x 6147.125 = 2566.85kmol/hr NH3 in F12 = 4299.24 - 2144.48
= 1732.4 kmol/hr CH4 in F12 = 826.45 kmol/hr
Ar in F12 = 330.12kmol/hr
Total no of moles in F12 = 28557.5 kmol/hr N2 = 6417.125 X 1000 = 22.47% 28557.5 H2 = 19251.4 X 1000 = 67.42% 28557.5 NH3 = 1732.4 X 1000 = 6.04% 28557.5 CH4 = 826.45 X 1000 = 2.89% 28557.5 Ar = 330.12 X 1000 = 1.17% 28577.5
Applying material balance across compressor
F11 + F 16 = F 12 F11 + F 16 = 28557.5 Applying H2 balance 0.7476 F11 + 0.6683 F 16 = 0.6742 x 28557.5 0.7476 [285557.5 – F16] + 0.6683 F 16 = 0.6742 X 23855.25 Therefore F16 = 26432.79 kmol/hr
Recycle = 26432.79 kmol/hr F11 = 28557.5-26432.79 = 2124.79 kmol/hr
Suppose the kmole of feed gases coming from absorber is A A x 0.99 = 2124.71 x 0.7476
A = 1588.43 kmol/hr
Amt of N2 Added = 2124.71 x 0.2476
= 526.1kmol/hr
Across the absorber applying overall material balance. H balance,
F10 x 0.942 kmol/hr
F10 = 1422.8025 kmol/hr
Applying material balance across CO2 removal
F8 x 0.6545 = F10 x 0.942
F8 = 1422.8025 x 0.942 = 2047.79 kmol/hr 0.6545
Applying material balance across shift converter
F7 x 0.534 = 2286.17 x 0.6545 F7 = 2914.49 kmol/hr
Applying material balance across H2S removal
F5 x 0.5123 = 2914.49 x 0.5134 F5 = 2920.75 kmol/hr
= 6.63 kmol/hr For H2S gas W = 0.094, TC = 373.K PC =89.63 bar P =49 bar T = -220C = 2510 K Tr = 257 = 0.67 373.5 Pr = 49 = 0.55 39.63 B0 = 0.083 - O.42 2 = - 0.59 ( 0.67)1.6 kg/m2B = 0,139 - 0.172 = -0.78 ( 0.67)4.2 Z = 1 - 0.59 x 0.55 = 0.52 0.67 PV = Z n RT 49 x V = 0.082 x 0.55 x 251 x 5.94 V = 1.297 m3 Solubility of H2S in Methanol = 60 m3 of H2S at - 220C & 49 atm m3 of methanol
= 1.534 = 2.56 x 10-2 x 1215 60 = 31.1 kg
kmol of methanol required = 31.1 = 0.97 kmol/hr
32
3% by weight of carbon is converted into coke, therefore only 97% of carbon is present in raw gas.
Coke formed = 20556.22 x 0.8489 x 0.03 = 523.5 kmol/hr
Applying mass balance across carbon recovery unit;
F3*=F5*- mass of coke formed (* denotes mass per unit time) F3*=2920.75x14.6-523.5x12=36361 kg/hr
Applying mass balance across gasifier
F1*=F3*-F2*=36361-462.42x32=21564 kg/hr Hence, Fuel Oil requirement=21,564 kg/hr
Energy Balance
Data for Specific heats
A 103 B 106 C 10-5 D CH4 1.702 9.081 -2.164 CH 3 OH 2.211 12.216 -3.450 NH3 (g) 3.578 3.020 -0.186 CO 4.376 1.257 - 0.031 CO 2 5.457 1.045 - 1.157 H 2 4.249 0.422 0.083 H2S 3.931 1.490 - 0.231 N2 3.280 0.593 0.040 O2 3.639 0.506 - 0.227 SO2 5.699 0.801 - 1.015 H2S (vap) 3.470 1.450 0.121
For liquids Cp/R =A +BT +CT
2 A 103 B 106 C NH3 (l) 22.626 - 100.75 192.77 Methanol 41.653 - 210.32 427.20 Water 8.712 1.25 - 0.18For Solids Cp/R = A +BT + CT
2 A 103 B 10-5 C Carbon (s) 1.771 0.771 - 8.67 S 4.114 - 1.728 - .78
Since, the assumed conversion=97% , from graph Inlet Temperature=3500C
Reaction is, CO +H2O CO2 +H2
(∆ H)298 = (HCO2 + HH2 ) – (HCO +HH2O)
= (-393509)- (- 110525 –285830) = 2846 kj/kmole
Mole, of CO converted =583.6 kmole/hr (∆ H)298 = 2846x 583.6
= 16.6 x 105 kj/hr
(∆ H)R = -2.27 x 107 kj/hr
For adiabatic condition, ∆ HR + ∆ HF8 + ∆ H298 = 0
∆ Hp =2.17 x 107 kj/hr
460 (T- 298) + 1.17/2 x 10 –3 (T2 – 2982 )
+0.3 x 105 (1/T – 1/298) = 1954.07
Solving this equation by heat & trail we get
T = 622.50 K
i.e.t = 349.50C
In cooler converted gas is cooled from 349.5 to 42.50C, i.e. from
Heat lost by converted gas = 1335.5 x 8.314 {4.6 (622.5-315.5) + 1.17x 10-3/2 (622.52 – 315.52 –6332 ) –0.3x105 (315.5 – 622.5)} =22.9 x 107 kj/hr
If m be amount of water required for cooling
M 4.18 x 25 =22.9 x 106
Therefore M =2.19 x 107 kg/hr
Taking refernce temp. =298k for balance around the Converter . Feed to converter is at 3500C
10-3(298 2 –623 2) + 0.0565 x 10 5 (1/623 – 1/298)]
= - 15.36 x107 kj/hr
NH3 formed =1167.66 kmole/hr
(∆ Hrxn) = -46110 KH/kmole
(∆ Hrxn)298 =700.6 x 46110 =- 3.23 x 107 kj/hr
If product is heated to a tamp . of T1 then
( ∆ H)F13 = 8.134 x 7145.79 [3.845 (T- 298) + 1.1299 x 10-3
(T2 – 2982) + 0.040 x 105 (1/T – 1/298)]
For adiabatic condition,
(H)F12 + (∆ H)F13 + (∆ Hrxn)298 = 0
( ∆ H)F13 =12.45 x107 =3.845(T – 298) + 1.1299 x 10-3 /2
+ (T2 – 2982 ) + 0.040 x 105 (1/T-1/298)
= 12.45 x 107 /7145.79 x 8.314
= 2095.60
Solving this equation by hit and trial wet dot, T= 773 k Temperature of outlet gas = 500.50C
Product gases are cooled from 500.50C to 4100C while heating
The feed gases from 2580C to 350 0C
Specification Sheet for Heat Exchanger design
Number required : 5
Function : To cool the gases coming out of shift Converter
Type : 1- 4 shell and tube with floating head.
Shell side:
Number of shell passes : 1
Shell side fluid : Hot Gases Shell internal diameter : 1067 mm Baffle spacing : 534 mm Entering temp. of gases : 132 0C
Leaving temp. of gases : 400C
Tube side:
Number of passes : 4 Number of tubes : 738 Tube length : 4.88 m
Tube pitch : 31.75 mm Outside diameter of tube : 25.4 mm Inside diameter of tube : 22.1 mm Entering temperature of Water : 200 C
Leaving temperature of Water : 350 C
Reactor Design
CATALYST
A triply promoted ( K2O-CaO-Al2O3) iron oxide catalyst will be used. The iron oxide
(Fe2O3-FeO) is in the form of nonstoichiometric magnetite. It is made by fusing the
magnetite with the promoters. The catalyst is reduced in situ, and the removal of oxygen yields a highly porous structure of iron with promoters present as interphases between iron crystals and as porous clusters along the pore walls. The pores range from 500A to
1000A and intraparticle diffusion is diffusion to occur by the bulk mechanism.
Alumina prevents sintering and corresponding loss of surface area and also bonds the K2O, preventing its loss during use. The K2O and CaO neutralize the acid character of
Al2O3. Both K2O and CaO decrease the electron work function of iron and increase its
ability to chemisorb nitrogen by charge transfer to the nitrogen.
PROPERTIES
Particle size: Granules, in size range 6-10 mm Bulk density: 1200kg/m3
Activity loss in service, 30-35% in 3yr depending on severity of operating conditions and presence of poisons. Catalyst is slowly deactivated at operating temperatures above 9850F.
CATALYSTS POISIONS
In addition these poisons, hydrocarbons such as lubricating oils and olefins can crack and plug pores. Sulphur, phosphorous and arsenic compounds should not exceed 15ppm. Though temporary poisons, they cause crystals growth and attendant area decline. Chlorine compounds form volatile alkali chlorides with promoters.
CHEMISTRY AND KINETICS
The overall stoichiometric equation is
1/2N2 + 3/2H2 NH3Extensive studies of ammonia synthesis on iron catalysts
suggest that the reaction occur through the following steps
N2 (g) 2N (ads)
H2 (g) 2H (ads)
N (ads) + H (ads) NH (ads) NH (ads) + H (ads) NH2 (ads)
NH2 (ads) + H (ads) NH3 (ads)
Nh3 (ads) NH3 (g)
A rate equation based on nitrogen adsorption as the slow step is the most commonly used although other forms have been development that also correlates the data Since the effectiveness factor of ammonia catalyst is less that unity in a commercial size pellets, it is desirafinely ground catalyst and employ and effectiveness factor correction for other sizes. Ammonia synthesis is another example of an old reaction with sufficient data existence to make this procedure feasible. The following equation in term of activity has been recommended.
Design of shift converter
Step -1 Reaction occurring in PFR
N2 + 3H2 k 2NH3
Or A + 3B k C
Reactor Kinetics
The only reaction that needs to be considered is the formation of ammonia from H2 and N2,
N2 + 3H2 ‹—› 2NH3
A common rate equation for ammonia synthesis is the Temkin-Pyzhev equation given
where R is the rate of nitrogen consumption per unit volume of catalyst, f is a catalyst activity factor, and Pi is the partial pressure of component i in the gas. Values for K1 and
K2: K1 = ko1exp(-E1/RT) K2=ko2exp(-E2/RT) Ko1 = 1.78954 x 104 kgmol/m3-hr-atm1.5 E1 = 20,800 kcal/kgmol Ko2 = 2.5714 x 1016 kgmol-atm0.5/m3-hr E2 = 47,400 kcal/kgmol
One limitation of this rate equation is that the rate will be infinite if the amount of
ammonia in the gas is zero, and this may occur in a reactor being fed with fresh make-up gas. To avoid this numerical problem, the rate equation may be multiplied by a factor K3PNH3/(1+K3PNH3) ; this will avoid the approach to infinity at low PNH3 while having little
Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Haougen-Watson (LHHW) form, which is one of the options for the RPLUG reactor block in Aspen:
Assume that f = 1.0 and K3 = 2 atm-1.
Assume that the bulk density of the catalyst is 1200 kg/m3 and that the catalyst costs $12/kg.
Now, reactor temperature is 450 degree Celsius Therefore, k1= 0.00873 kmol/m3-hr-atm1.5
K2=106.3 kmol-atm0.5/m3-hr
Also, pi=pio(1-Xi)/(1+EiXi) ; where i=A,B,C
EA=(2-4)/2=-0.5 & XB=3XA,XC=2XA
Using pAO=0.2247*200=44.94atm,pBO=0.6742*200=134.84atm,pCO=0.06*200=12atm
Finally, we get pA=44.94(1-XA)/(1-0.5XA) pB=134.84(1-3XA)/(1-1.5XA) pC=12(1-2XA)/(1-XA) 1228.6(1-XA)(1-3XA) 9.78(1-2XA)1.5 2 (1-1.5XA) 1.5 (1-0.5XA)(1-1.5XA)1.5 (1-XA)2(1-3XA)1.5
(-r
A)
= 24(1-2XA) 1 + (1-XA)Now plug flow reactor design equation dxA = V
(-rA) FAO
Where FAO -- feed rate of A
From V = ∫ dxA ( limits from 0 to 0.2) FAO (-rA) XA 0 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 -rA 48.7 25 24.5 23.9 23.5 23.23 1/-rA 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
1/(-rA) vs XA 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 XA 1 /( -r A ) Series1
Area under curve = 30x0.005x0.05=7.6 x 10-3
V = FAO x (R+1)x 7.6 x 10-3
V = 28557.5 x 10.4 x 7.6 x 10-3
V = 16.362m3
Take factor of safety = 10% New volume = 1.1 x 16.362 = 18 m3 Assume L/D = 4 Volume = Π/4 x D2 x L 18 = Π/4 x D2 x (4D) D3 = 5.729 D = 1.212 m Hence length (L) = 4 x 1.212 = 4.848 m
Now catalyst is divided in 2 beds in ratios 1:2.5 (as upper bed : lower bed)
= 5.14 m3
Volume of catalyst in 2nd bed = (18 – 5.14)
= 12.86 m3
Bulk density of catalyst = 1200 kg/ m3
Weight of catalyst in 2nd bed = 12.86 x 1200
= 15.432 tonne Weight of catalyst in 1st bed = 5.14 x 1200
= 6.168 tonne
Now giving allowance for space for gas movement upward and downward and insulation be 0.5 m
Hence diameter of reactor becomes = 1.212 + 0.5 = 1.712 m Pressure at which reactor works = 200 kg/m2
Let factor of safety = 20% Design pressure = 1.2 x 200 = 240 kg/m2
We use carbon steel with internal lining of titanium Allowable stress = 66,000 psi {hesse & ruston} = 4494 kgf/cm2
Now Allowable stress = PD(1/k2 – 1) (from Hesse)
Where PD = design pressure
4494 = 240(1/k2 – 1) k = 1.0337 Do = kDi Do = 1.0337 x 1.212 = 1.252 m Thickness of shell = (1.252 – 1.212)/2=20mm
Specification sheet for Ammonia Convertor
Operating pressure : 200 kg/m
2Design pressure : 240 kg/m
2Temperature : 300 – 520
oC
Allowable stress : 4494 kgf/cm
2Material of construction : Cr – Mo steel
Diameter inside of converter : 1.212 m
Bulk density of catalyst : 1200 kg/m
3Total volume of catalyst : 18 m
3Diameter of catalyst bed : 1.252 m
Thickness of the shell : 20mm
Volume of 1
stcatalyst bed : 5.14 m
3Weight of 1
stcatalyst bed : 6.168 tonne
Weight of 1
stcatalyst bed : 15.432 tonne
MECHANICAL DESIGN OF SHELL & TUBE
HEAT EXCHANGER
Carbon steel(corrosion allowance=3mm)
Allowable stress=11,000/14.7=749atm
[ref.PED by hesse & ruston,pg.60,table3.1]
SHELL SIDE
No. of pass=1
Fluids in shell are hydrogen ,nitrogen ,ammonia & inerts like argon
& methane
Design pressure=51 kgf/sq. cm=51atm
Shell diameter=1067mm
THICKNESS OF SHELL= [pD/2fJ-p]+c
Where;
P=design pressure
D=shell ID
F=allowable stress
J=joint efficiciency
C=corrosion allowance
Shell thickness= [51
x1067/(2
x749
x.85-51)]+3
=48mm
SHELL HEAD : assuming dished heads(because Pressure<200psi)
Head thickness=0.833pL / fJ
L=crown radius=shell ID-6inches
=1067-(6
x25.4)
=924.6mm
head thickness=(0.833
x51
x914.6)/(749
x0.85)
= 61mm
knuckle radius=0.06
xOD of shell
=0.06
x(1067+48)
=67mm
depth of head = L-(L
2-D
2/4)
1/2=170mm
effective length=4.88+(2
x0.170)
=5.22mm
surface area=6.28Lh
=0.9871 sq. meter
[ref. pg 92 of hesse & ruston for formulas]
TUBE SIDE
Stainless steel(corrosion allowance=0)
Allowable stress=9000/14.7=613atm
[ref pg60,table3.1 of hesse & ruston]
TUBE THICKNESS= pD/(2fJ-p)
J=1(seamless tube)
Working pressure=1atm
Design pressure=1.1 times 1atm=1.1atm
Tube ID=22.1mm
Tube thickness=0.02mm( required)
Tube thickness=(OD-ID)/2=1.65mm(actual)
Hence, tube design is safe.
MECHANICAL DESIGN OF REACTOR
Material used is Carbon Steel
Thickness of reactor=pD/2fJ-p + C
T
reactor=(1.1
x200)
x1.212/(2
x4494
x0.85-200)+ 3 mm
= 39 mm
therefore, OD of Reactor=ID+2
xt
=1.212+2
x.039
=1.29m
let head be the dished heads
knucke radius=0.06
xOD of reactor
= 0.06
x1.29
= 77.4 mm
Crown radius, L= ID of reactor-6inches
= 1.212-6
x.0254
Head thickness= 0.833pL/fJ
= 0.833
x1.1
x200
x1.06/0.85
x4494
= 51 mm
h= depth of head=L-(L
2-D
2/4)
1/2=190 mm
e ffective length = 4.848+2
x0.190
= 5.228 m
Surface area = 6.28Lh
= 6.28
x1.06
x0.190
= 1.265 m
2Cost Analysis
Cost estimation is a specialized subject and profession in its own right. Chemical plants are built to make a profit. An estimate of the investment required and the cost of production needed before the profitability of project can be assessed.
Cost in plant can be classified
as-1. Fixed capital 2. Working capital (1) Fixed
capital:-Fixed capital is the cost of the plant ready to start up. It includes
1. Design
2. Equipment and interaction
3. Piping instrumentation and control system 4. Building and structure
5. Auxiliary facilities such as utilities (2) Working capital
Working capital is additional investment needed over and above fixed capital to start up the plant. It includes
2. Catalyst cost 3. Raw material
4. Finished product inventories
These costs are required to be corrected to the specific capacity and index price of the given year.
Correction of index price
Cost in yr. A = Cost in yr. B x Cost index of yr. A
Cost index of yr. B
Correction of capacity C2 = C1 (S2/S1)n
C2 = Capital cost at capacity S2
C1 = Capital cost at capacity S1
n = power factor
(From Peter Timmer Haus, page 186)
Ammonia plant capacity = 100,000 ton/yr.
Fixed capital investment = 24 x 106 $ (Based on 1979)
Power factor for ammonia = 0.55 Our plant capacity = 1200TPD Equation (2) C2 = C1 (s2 )n
s1
Taking that our plant runs for 335 days /yr. deducting the time for normal shut down period.
Capacity = 1200 x 335 tons/yr. = 402000 tons/yr. C2 = 24 x 106 x (402000) 0.55
100000 = 51.59 x 106$
Cost index = 1200
CI =585.9(based on 1979)
Cost in yr. 2008 = cost in yr. 1979 x C.I. 2008 C.I.1979 Thus, Cost in yr. 2008 = (51.59 x 106) x 1200 585.9 =105.663 x 106 $
From Peter Timer Haus -
Working capital = 15% [fixed + working capital] W.C. = F.C. x 15
85
W.C. = 105.663 x 15 x 106
85
= 18.646 x 106 $
Therefore total capital investment = 105.663 x 106 + 18.646 x 106
= 124.31 x 106 $
Taking currency exchange rate as 1 $ = 44 Rs. Total capital investment = 546.964 crore
Total capital investment = 124.31 x 106 x44
=5469.64 x 106
=Rs.546.64 crore
DIRECT COST
Component Given range Assumed range(%FCI) Cost (Rs.crores)
Purchased equip. 15-40 25 116.25
Instrumentation 02-18 07 32.55 Piping 03-20 08 37.20 Electrical 02-10 05 23.25 B uilding 03-18 05 23.25 Yarest 02-05 02 9.3 Service facilities 08-20 15 69.75 Land 01-02 01 4.65
Total direct cost = Rs. 358.05 crore Indirect cost
Engineer and supervision 04-25 10 46.5
Construction expenses 04-16 12 55.8
Contractor fee 02-06 02 9.3
Contingency 05-15 08 37.20
Total Indirect cost = Rs. 148.8 crore
Direct + Indirect cost = Rs 506.85 crore
COST OF REACTOR
Volume of cylinder=3.14*l*(OD
2-ID
2)/4
OD=1.290m
ID= 1.212m
Length,l=4.848m
Therefore, vol of cyl. Material = 0.743m
3
Density of Carbon Steel=7820 kg/m
3, Price of carbon steel= Rs 45/kg
Therefore, Cost of Reactor material = 0.743
x7820
x45=2.62 lakh
CATALYST
Volume of catalyst = 18 m
3Price of catalyst = $12/kg
Density of catalyst = 1200 kg/m
3Therefore, Cost of catalyst = 18
x1200
x12
x44 = 1.141 Crores
Now, taking fabrication cost = 70% of total cost of equipment
= 2.26
x0.7/0.3 = 5.273 lakh
Hence, total cost of reactor (including catalyst) = 1.141+.05273+.0262
= 1.22 Crores
COST OF HEAT EXCHANGER
Volume of shell material = 3.14
xlength
x(OD
2-ID
2)/4
OD = 1.115m
ID = 1.067m
Volume of shell material = 0.4012 m
3Volume of one tube = 3.14
xlength
x(OD
2-ID
2)/4
OD=.0254m
ID = .0221m
Length= 16 ft
Volume of single tube = 6
x10
-4m
3Total vol. of tubes= 6
x10-4
x730
= 0.4383 m
3Density of material(carbon steel) = 7820 kg/m
3Cost of material = Rs 45/kg
Therefore, Cost of heat exchanger material = (0.4012+0.4383)
x7820
x45
= 2.954 lakh
total cost of heat exchanger(including fabrication)= 2.954
x1/0.3
= 9.847 lakh
Safety And Hazards
FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS
Due to high vapour pressure of ammonia, container for ammonia should not be exposed to the Sun and other sources of heat and should be properly insulated.
Ammonia vapours are flammable in certain percentages in air, but since these high concentrations are seldom encountered, the relative fire and explosion hazard is small. Experience has shown that ammonia is hard to ignite, so it is generally treated as a non inflammable compressed gas. However, certain safe practices should be followed.
Electrical apparatus and fixtures should be vapour proof and plugged in at locations free from ammonia gas.
• Equipment, tanks and lines that contain ammonia should not be welded without first being thoroughly washed or steamed. Aqueous fire extinguishers are satisfactory for ammonia fires.
• Since ammonia is readily soluble in water, hose streams can be used effectively to remove ammonia from the air in contaminated areas.
CLOTHING AND PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Persons subject to exposure should be provided with gas masks of ammonia the type approved by the Bureau of Mines, rubber hats, suits, gloves and boots. Garment worth beneath rubber clothing should be cotton. Eye gogg1es or full face masks should be provided. Easily accessible safety showers and bubble fountains for washing the eye is .recommended.
FIRE PREVENTION STEPS IN AMMONIA
1. Fire fighting extinguishers 2. Water and foam tenders
3. Breathing apparatus, gas mask, ear plugs, aluminized suits for rescue purpose, pressure bags for lifting heavy equipments
4. High expansion foam generator 5. On site emergency plant
Apart from the above, fire alarms, smoke detectors and fire hydrants are also provided in plant.
Since ammonia is corrosive to alloys of copper and zinc, these materials must not be used in ammonia service- iron or steel should usually be the only metal used for ammonia storage tank, piping and fittings.
Cleaning and Repairs of Equipments
Wherever possible, ammonia tanks and other equipment should be cleaned and repaired from the outside. When it is necessary to enter an ammonia vessel all lines leading to the vessel should be disconnected and provided with blind flanges. Danger signs should be placed at appropriate points to wary other work men and all electric apparatus should be turned off. One person keeps close watch outside the tanks and has dosed at hand the proper emergency equipment, respirator, and fire outing wishes. The tank should 'be filled with water and drained before being entered and should purge with air and tested for explosive atmospheres.
FIRST AID
A person who has been overcome of burned by ammonia should be placed under the case of physician at once. The patient should be removed from contact with ammonia as soon as possible and kept warm and quiet.
Physiological response to various concentration of ammonia
ppm
Least detectable odor - 53
Least amount causing immediate irritations to eyes- 698
Least amount causing immediate irritations to the throat- 408
Least amount causing coughing- 1720
Prolonged exposure- 100
HAZARDS OF AMMONIA
1. Toxic hazards
In general ammonia gas under high concentration causes irritation to eyes. 2. Explosive Hazards
Ammonia is explosive with air in the range of 16 to 25% by volume. Its auto ignition temperature is 651°C since such temperature are not encountered in practice; the chance of fire and explosive hazards due to ammonia is relatively remote. The presence of oil in mixture of ammonia with other combustible materials will increase the /fire hazard. The explosive range of ammonia is;
1. Temperature and pressure higher than atm conditions.
2. Presence of chlorine higher than ammonia causes chlorine to react with ammonia and form a violently explosive compound.
SAFETY IN AMMONIA PLANTS
• Wear ear plugs• wear approved respirator & protective clothing
• Wear safety helmet, goggles, hand glows, safety shoes.
• Keep away from heat, flames, spark & oxidizing material
• Keep area ventilated & report the leakage
• Keep people away from hazardous area.
Pollution Control
1) Ash Slurry treatment Scheme
The ash slurry from steam generation plant is pumped by the existing sat of pumps to the proposed ash ponds. The ash is settled in the ponds by gravity settling. The clear overflow from the ponds is discharged into sump from where the clear water is pumped to steam generation plant for de-ashing purpose or can be drained to the river sump directly.
2) Oily Effluent Treatment Scheme
Two nos. of oil separators are provided to receive oil effluent. Each separator has about 75 m3 capacity and both put together can receive 150m3 of effluent per day. Oil
separators are to be operated alternately. They are building with stilling, inlet chamber, and deoiler pipe, baffle for retaining the floating oil and overflow weir. Oil separates and floats to the surface by gravity separation.
3) Reuse of Process condensate as boiler feed water make up
In ammonia plant, the main source of liquid effluents is process condensate. It is well known that steam is used in excess of stoichioimetric requirements for reforming and shift conversion in ammonia plant. This excess steam is subsequently removed as process condensate which contains impurities like carbon dioxide, ammonia, methanol etc. This condensate cannot be directly used anywhere due to the presence of impurities.
4) Non-Chromate based cooling water treatment
Cooling water treatment is of vital importance for all the chemical process industry. When the original plant was commissioned in 1974, chromate based cooling water treatment was adopted. About 15-20 ppm chromate was maintained in the circulating cooling water. The chromate is toxic and harmful to the environment. This hexavalent chromate was converted into trivalent chromate and separated out as sludge.
To overcome chromate sludge storage problem and to adopt environmental friendly system, non-chromate based cooling water treatment was adopted in Apirl,1998.
Non-chromate treatment programme are mainly based on o-phosphate and zinc with different combinations. o- phosphate concentration of 6 ppm minimum and Zincconcentration of 1 ppm maximum is maintained as corrosion inhibitor. Polymer based bio-dispersant and boicides are also added.
Three different biocides are shock dosed alternatively in addition to chlorination for micro biological growth control as per requirement. Dispersants are added to keep the salts of circulating water in dispersion condition. All the chemicals used for non chromate treatment are biodegradable chemicals.
Overhead vapours about 6000 kg/hr from condensate stripper were vented to atmosphere. the overhead vapours contain ammonia, methanol, amines and CO2. Ammonia present in the overhead vapours is about 5000 ppm. The limit specified by Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) for ammonia is 100 ppm. To avoid the venting of ammonia to atmosphere,
the overhead vapours from the top of the condensate stripper are diverted to the vent condenser (172-C). All the vapours are condensed and non-condensables mainly CO2 is vented to atmosphere. The condensate from the vent condenser can either be sent to Ammonia recovery and stripping system in ammonia plant or to hydrolyser stripper system in urea plant by condensate transfer pump. The system is shown as annexure - VI. The system has reduced the 720 kg/d ammonia to atmosphere and pollution norms has been also met.
6) Biological Treatment of Effluent
After giving treatment, the effluent is further bio-degraded in the effluent ponds having a holding capacity of 1, 00,000 m3 before final discharge to the river Damodar.
Factory effluent mixed with sanitary waste methanol water and is treated with the help of bacteria. The bacterial actions consist of hydrolysis, nitrification and denitrification. HYDROLYSIS
In the process of metabolism through heterotrophic bacteria.complex carbohydrates, proteins and insoluble fats present in sanitary waste are hydrolyzed into soluble sugar, amino acids and fatty acids.
Hydrolysis of urea takes place and converts organic nitrogen to ammonium carbonate. (NH2)2C03 +2H2O (NH4)2 C03
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) is reduced by hydrolysis under aerobic condition in presence of baceotrophic bacteria.
NITRIFICATION
Ammonical nitrogen is converted to nitrites and then to nitrate form in a presence of autotrophic bacteria under aerobic condition.
N02- + 1/2 O2 - N03
-NH4+ +2O2 - NO3H + H2O
DENTRIFICATION:
Heterotrophic bacteria in anaerobic condition reduce nitrite (N02) and Nitrate (N03) to
gaseous N2. An organic carbon, as methanol, acetic acid, acetone, ethanol or sugar is
reduced to act as a hydrogen donor to supply carbon for biological synthesis. The required BOD is supplied by waste methanol (6000 ppm) which serves as an energy source for survival and growth of bacteria.
First methanol reduces:
3O2 + 2 CH3OH - 2 CO2 + H2O
Then bacterial reduction of N02 & N03 takes place.
6 NO3- + 5 CH3OH - 3 N2 + 5CO2 + 7 H2O + 6OH
-2 NO2- + CH3OH – N2 + CO + H 2O+ 2 OH
-Aeration is helpful for the removal of gaseous product and increase dissolved oxygen in the effluent. In the step of hydrolysis urea (500 ppm) degrades to 50 ppm level.
Instrumentation
The even operation of a process is dependant upon the control of process variables. These are defined as the conditions in the process material and equipments which are
subjected to change. There may be several materials and several pertinent operating factors which may change in the simplest of process; the maintenance of control over an entire process is an important aspect of process design. In Ammonia manufacture temperature and pressure are two process variables on which operation of whole plant
depends upon. Instrumentation of each equipment is done separately. 1. REACTOR
Feed to the converter is at 750C which is made to pass through the internal heat
exchangers so that it may gain heat from outgoing gases to attain reaction initiation temp. This temperature of gas at the inlet of catalyst bed is taken into account by TIC (temp. indicator controller) put in line with the start up heater.
In case temperature goes below the reaction initiation temperature.
Then automatically start up heater works and temperature of product gas is increased which in turn heats the incoming gases to the required reaction initiation temperature. But if the temperature goes high then a portion of by pass feed controls the temperature. Temperature control is necessary because in first case, reaction would not start till the required temperature is attained. And in the later case, temperature goes too high then catalyst may get spoiled. Pressure inside the reactor is 300 atm. and any change in pressure will effect the conversion therefore pressure control is also necessary so we will have to employ pressure gauges and pressure controller valves.
Temperature indicator devices are put on both inlet and outlet streams and if temperature of outgoing gases goes below 162°C the water flow in the heat exchanger (waste heat boiler) is reduced with the help of a hand controller valve.
2. AMMONIA COOLED CONDENSER
A level indicator controller is installed in the ammonia refrigeration loop so as to maintain a constant level which is necessary to get required refrigeration to bring down the temperature of gas to -S °C where required condensation of ammonia is acting.
3. AMMONIA SEPARATOR
Here also a level indicator controller is required to maintain a particular level of liquid ammonia in it so no gas but only liquid product is obtained.
4. AMMONIA STORAGE
Ammonia is stored at a pressure of 40 psig and temperature 25.80 F. However, efficient
are formed. Pressure inside the tank increases so there must be some arrangement to reduce this pressure. A safety valve may be provided at the top of 'Horton Sphere'. Whenever pressure inside the vessel rises some of the vapors are vented. These vented gases either released at. 6 ft. high stack or can be compressed and condensed in a close loop to reduce atmospheric pollution. In a closed loop system vent are stored in a small vessel from where those gases are compressed, condensed and then fed to the storage tank.
TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT
Temperature measurement is done by using thermocouples. Since ammonia corrodes metals like Cu and Zn. The thermocouple selected is chromel (Ni 90%, Cr 10%)
Alumd (Ni 94%, Mn 3%, Al 2%). It can be used in temperature ranging from 600 to 2100 of vertically in the converter. Slight variations of temperature inside the converter are transmitted through the transmitter to the error is passed on to a diaphragm motor valve which controls the flow of gases to the converter.
INSTRUMENT AND FITTINGS
Gasket material most suitable for anhydrous ammonia service is hard finished. Such as flange facings where the gasket material is retained in a groove. And on gasket material is retained in a groove. And on gasket bodies, lead may be used. Aluminum has been applied satisfactorily as a gasket material for flat faced and grooved flanged joints but. is not. Generally recommended Rubber rings cannot. be used. All ammonia piping should be extra heavy (sch. 80). Steel piping may be used where joints are welded. Galvanized pipe should never be used. Welded pipes should be used wherever possible. Welded pipe flanges may be used on all pipe joints of 1.25" or larger. Under no circumstances brazed joint be used, as they will deteriorate rapidly.
Explosive Industry
The explosive industry is one of the largest consumers of ammonia.
It is used principally in the form of Nitric acid for the manufacture of compounds such as TNT, Nitroglycerine, nitrocellulose, nitro starch, Pentaerythrital t1tranitrate, tetraethyl and ammonium nitrate.
Textile Industry
In textile industries, ammonia is used in the production ff synthetic fibres such as cupraammonium rayon and nylon. In the production of rayon, the ammonia is used in the preparation of ammonical copper hydroxide solution (Schweiter's reagent) for dissolving the cotton linters.
In the rayon process ammonia is used in the production of hexamethylene diamine, which is considered with-adipic acid to form the monomer, which in turn is polymerized and speen into polyamide fibres.
Fertilizer Industry
The fertilizer industry is a heavy consumer of ammonia and its compounds. The main nitrogenous fertilizers are
- Anhydrous ammonia - Ammonia liquor - Ammonium Nitrate - Urea - Ammonium Sulphate - Calcium Cynamide
- Sodium Ammonium Nitrate.
Ammoniation of phosphatic fertilizer produces fertilizer mixture with improved physical properties.
Ammonia is an important ingredient in the manufacture of sulfa drugs such as sulfanilamide sulphath1azole and sulfapyridine. It. is also used in the manufacture of vitamins and antimalarials.
Petroleum Industry
In the refining of crude oils, ammonia is used as neutralizing agent to prevent corrosion in acid condensers, heat exchangers etc. of the distillation equipment.
Ammonia is also used to neutralize final traces of acid in acid-treated lubricating oil stocks and pressure distillates,
Rubber Industry
Ammonia is used to raw latex to prevent coagulation during transportation from the rubber plantation to Ammonia is also used in the nuconization the factory process for the manufacture of fabrics, boots, shoes etc.
Refrigeration
Ammonia is most commonly used refrigerant, especially for large industrial installations. It can be used in both compression and absorption system for
1) Production of ice
2) Refrigeration cold-storage plants 3) Quick – freezing units
4) Food-lockers
5) Air conditioning large industrial plants
Certain characteristics of ammonia such as high latent heat of vaporization low vapour density. Chemical stability and low corrosion to compressor parts, make operating costs per ton lower for ammonia than for any other refrigerants used in industrial systems.
Inorganic Chemicals Industry
A large number of ammonium salts having numerous industrial applications are produced by direct neutralization of their respective acid with ammonia.
Important industrial compounds produced are ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulphate mono and diammonium phosphate and ammonium acetate.
Acid Manufacture
In the lead chamber process for sulfuric acid manufacture, Ammonia is oxidized to give Nitrogen oxide to provide required oxygen required for conversion of SO2 to sulphuric
acid.
Pulp and Paper Industry A recent development is the substitution of ammonia for
calcium in the bisulphate process for pulping wood. The ammonia base is said to improve the yield and Quality of pulp.
Leather Industry
Ammonia is used as slime and mold preventive in tanning liquors.and as a. curing agent in making leather.
Bibliography
1. Perry, R.H., "Perry's Chemical Engineers Handbook", 6th Ed., McGraw Hill Company, 1984.
2. McCabe Warren L., Smith Julian C., Harriot Peter, "Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering", 4th Ed., McGraw Hill, Inc., 1981.
3. Levenspiel Octave, "Chemical Reaction Engineering 2nd Ed., Wiley Eastern Ltd., 1991.
4. Peters M.S., Timmerhaus K.D., "Plant Design and
Economics for Chemical Engineers", 4th Ed., McGraw Hill, 1991.
5. Treybal R.E., "Mass Transfer Operations", 3rd Ed., McGraw Hill Company, 1981.
6. Hesse, Herman C. and Rushton, J. Henry "Process Equipment Design" Affiliated East-West Press Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
7. Richardson & coulson Vol 6
8. Operating Manual, "Ammonia Plant" of National Fertilizers ltd. Bathinda 9. Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes by Felder