• No results found

α Form of tris­(2,4 pentane­dionato O,O′)­vanadium(III), re refinement against new intensity data

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "α Form of tris­(2,4 pentane­dionato O,O′)­vanadium(III), re refinement against new intensity data"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Acta Cryst.(2001). E57, m157±m158 DOI: 101107/S1600536801004391 Carlos A. L. Filgueiraset al. [V(C5H7O2)3]

m157

metal-organic papers

Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports

Online ISSN 1600-5368

a

-Form of tris(2,4-pentanedionato-

O

,

O

000

)vanadium(III),

re-refinement against new intensity data

Carlos A. L. Filgueiras,aAdolfo

Horn Jr,aR. Alan Howie,b*

Janet M. S. Skakleband James L.

Wardella

aDepartamento de QuõÂmica InorgaÃnica, Instituto

de QuõÂmica, Universidad Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CP 68563, 21945-970 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, andbDepartment of Chemistry,

University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland

Correspondence e-mail: r.a.howie@abdn.ac.uk

Key indicators Single-crystal X-ray study T= 297 K

Mean(C±C) = 0.004 AÊ Rfactor = 0.044 wRfactor = 0.139

Data-to-parameter ratio = 25.1

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2001 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved

The title compound, V(MeCOCHCOMe)3 or [V(C5H7O2)3],

has been prepared by an unusual route. Its structure, con®rming its identity, is the same as that reported by Morosin & Montgomery [Acta Cryst. (1969), B25, 1354±1359] but enhanced in precision.

Comment

There are at least two previous reports of the preparation of the title compound, (I), which is also known as tris(acetyl-acetonato)vanadium(III). Grdenic & Korper-Colig (1964) prepared it by reaction of VO(acac)2 with Zn and

2,4-pentanedione (Hacac). It has also been obtained (Morosin & Montgomery, 1969) by the reaction of V2(SO4)3(obtained by

the electrolytic reduction of VOSO4) with Hacac in sodium

carbonate solution. Morosin & Montgomery described two crystalline forms of the material, a monoclinicform [refcode in Cambridge Structural Database (Allen & Kennard, 1993): VAACAC01], and the orthorhombic form (VAACAC) whose stucture was determined and re®ned on the basis of 3061 re¯ections with 1361 classed as observed [I> 3(I)]. The improved precision of the re-re®nement of the form (I) presented here is attributed to a more extensive and better quality set of intensity data (see Tables) in conjunction with the use of up-to-date software (SHELXL97; Sheldrick, 1997).

Fig. 1 shows the molecule and atom labelling scheme [identical to that used by Morosin & Montgomery (1969)] and Table 1 compares selected bond distances and angles between their determination and this work.

Experimental

Compound (I) was obtained from VO(acac)2(0.400 g, 1.50 mmol) and a slight excess (ca 1.75 mmol) of K[SnPh3] prepared from Ph3SnH and KH, in tetrahydrofuran solution under an argon atmo-sphere. The deep-purple solution was stirred at room temperature for 1 h, concentrated, hexane added, and the mixture left in a freezer for 3 d. After ®ltering off an amorphous brown precipitate, the solution was left for a further period after which dark-orange brown crystals of (I) were deposited and collected [m.p. 460±461 K; literature 459± 462 K (Morosin & Montgomery, 1969)].

(2)

Crystal data [V(C5H7O2)3]

Mr= 348.26 Orthorhombic,Pcab a= 15.4466 (7) AÊ

b= 16.6228 (8) AÊ

c= 13.5016 (6) AÊ

V= 3466.7 (3) AÊ3

Z= 8

Dx= 1.334 Mg mÿ3

Dm= 1.33 Mg mÿ3

Dmmeasured by ¯otation in CCl4/ EtOH (Morosin & Montgomery, 1969)

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 4494

re¯ections = 2.4±26.4

= 0.60 mmÿ1

T= 297 (2) K

Block, dark orange±brown 0.300.200.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1000 area-detector diffractometer

'and!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1999)

Tmin= 0.445,Tmax= 0.928 28 129 measured re¯ections 5155 independent re¯ections

2251 re¯ections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.055 max= 31.0

h=ÿ22!14

k=ÿ23!24

l=ÿ17!18 Intensity decay: none

Re®nement Re®nement onF2

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.044

wR(F2) = 0.139

S= 0.94 5155 re¯ections 205 parameters

H-atom parameters constrained

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0658P)2] whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3 (/)max= 0.003

max= 0.29 e AÊÿ3 min=ÿ0.56 e AÊÿ3

Table 1

Comparison table of selected bond distances (AÊ) and angles ().

VAACAC This work

min. max. min. max.

VÐO 1.967 (8) 1.995 (8) 1.9688 (17) 1.9912 (18)

CÐO 1.235 (14) 1.268 (14) 1.257 (3) 1.268 (3)

endo-CÐC 1.376 (19) 1.408 (19) 1.363 (4) 1.390 (4)

CÐMe 1.497 (21) 1.528 (21) 1.497 (4) 1.516 (3)

Ligand bite 87.5 (6) 88.4 (6) 87.23 (8) 88.18 (7)

Re®nement was started on the basis of coordinates for non-H atoms extracted from the Cambridge Structural Database (Allen & Kennard, 1993) (VAACAC; Morosin & Montgomery, 1969) by means of the EPSRC's chemical database service at Daresbury (Fletcheret al., 1996). The non-standard space group setting and atom labels of the original determination were retained, but the cell dimensions were adjusted appropriately for the new intensity data. In the ®nal stages, H atoms were placed in calculated positions (CÐH = 0.96 and 0.93 AÊ for methyl and alkene H atoms, respectively) and re®ned in a riding-model approximation. Methyl groups were treated as rigid bodies. The incompleteness (92.95% complete) of the intensity data available for this re-re®nement is due to the presence of a few defective frames in the raw intensity data.

Data collection:SMART(Bruker, 1999); cell re®nement:SAINT

(Bruker, 1999); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:

ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXL97.

We wish to acknowledge the use of the EPSRC's Chemical Database Service at Daresbury.

References

Allen, F. R. & Kennard, O. (1993).Chem. Des. Autom. News,8, 1, 31±37. Bruker (1999).SADABS,SMARTandSAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison,

Wisconsin, USA.

Farrugia, L. J. (1997).J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565.

Fletcher, D. A., McMeekin, R. F. & Parkin, D. (1996).J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.36, 746±749.

Grdenic, D. & Korper-Colig, B. (1964).Inorg. Chem.3, 1328±1329. Morosin, B. & Montgomery, H. (1969).Acta Cryst.B25, 1354±1359. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997).SHELXL97. University of GoÈttingen, Germany. Figure 1

(3)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m157–m158

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m157–m158 [doi:10.1107/S1600536801004391]

α-Form of tris(2,4-pentanedionato-

O

,

O

)vanadium(III), re-refinement against

new intensity data

Carlos A. L. Filgueiras, Adolfo Horn, R. Alan Howie, Janet M. S. Skakle and James L. Wardell

S1. Comment

There are at least two previous reports of the preparation of the title compound, (I), which is also known as tris(acetyl-acetonato)vanadium(III). Grdenic & Korper-Colig (1964) prepared it by reaction of VO(acac)2 with Zn and

2,4-pentane-dione (Hacac). It has also been obtained (Morosin & Montgomery, 1969) by the reaction of V2(SO4)3 (obtained by the

electrolytic reduction of VOSO4) with Hacac in sodium carbonate solution. Morosin & Montgomery described two

crystalline forms of the material, a monoclinic β form [REFCODE in Cambridge Structural Database (Allen & Kennard, 1993): VAACAC01], and the orthorhombic α form (VAACAC) whose stucture was determined and refined on the basis of 3061 reflections with 1361 classed as observed [I>3σ(I)]. The improved precision of the rerefinement of the α form (I) presented here is attributed to a more extensive and better quality set of intensity data (see Tables) in conjunction with the use of up-to-date software (SHELXL97; Sheldrick, 1997).

Fig. 1 shows the molecule and atom labelling scheme [identical to that used by Morosin & Montgomery (1969)] and Table 1 compares selected bond distances and angles between their determination and this work.

S2. Experimental

Compound (I) was obtained from VO(acac)2 (0.400 g, 1.50 mmol) and a slight excess (ca 1.75 mmol) of K[SnPh3]

prepared from Ph3SnH and KH, in tetrahydrofuran solution under an argon atmosphere. The deep-purple solution was

stirred at room temperature for 1 h, concentrated, hexane added, and the mixture left in a freezer for 3 d. After filtering off an amorphous brown precipitate, the solution was left for a further period after which dark-orange brown crystals of (I) were deposited and collected [m. p. 460–461 K; literature 459–462 K (Morosin & Montgomery, 1969)].

S3. Refinement

Refinement was started on the basis of coordinates for non-H atoms extracted from the Cambridge Structural Database (Allen & Kennard, 1993) (VAACAC: Morosin & Montgomery, 1969) by means of the EPSRC's chemical database service at Daresbury (Fletcher et al., 1996). The non-standard space group setting and atom labels of the original determination were retained, but the cell dimensions were adjusted appropriately for the new intensity data. In the final stages, H atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.96 and 0.93 Å for methyl and alkene H atoms,

respectively) and refined in a riding-model approximation. Methyl groups were treated as rigid bodies. The

(4)
[image:4.610.130.486.71.431.2]

Figure 1

The molecule of (I) showing the labelling scheme. Non-H atoms are shown as 50% probability ellipsoids. H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

Tris(2,4-pentanedionato-O,O′)-vanadium(III) (alpha form)

Crystal data

[V(C5H7O2)3] Mr = 348.26

Orthorhombic, Pcab a = 15.4466 (7) Å

b = 16.6228 (8) Å

c = 13.5016 (6) Å

V = 3466.7 (3) Å3 Z = 8

F(000) = 1456

Dx = 1.334 Mg m−3 Dm = 1.33 Mg m−3

Dm measured by flotation in CCl4/EtOH

(Morosin & Montgomery, 1969) Melting point = 460–461 K Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 4494 reflections

θ = 2.4–26.4°

µ = 0.60 mm−1 T = 297 K

(5)

supporting information

sup-3

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m157–m158

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1000 area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

φ and ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1999)

Tmin = 0.445, Tmax = 0.928

28129 measured reflections 5155 independent reflections 2251 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.055

θmax = 31.0°, θmin = 2.3°

h = −22→14

k = −23→24

l = −17→18

Refinement

Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044 wR(F2) = 0.139 S = 0.94 5155 reflections 205 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters constrained

w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0658P)2]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max = 0.003

Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

Δρmin = −0.56 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used

only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2

are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger. H in calculated positions and refined with a riding model.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

C1 0.0027 (2) 0.35220 (15) 0.33680 (19) 0.0682 (7) C10 −0.0267 (3) 0.40889 (19) 0.4181 (2) 0.1098 (13)

H10A −0.0192 0.3834 0.4813 0.165*

H10B −0.0867 0.4219 0.4087 0.165*

H10C 0.0072 0.4573 0.4157 0.165*

C12 −0.04869 (19) 0.33732 (18) 0.2556 (2) 0.0772 (9)

H12 −0.1024 0.3626 0.2533 0.093*

C2 −0.02683 (18) 0.28758 (18) 0.17693 (19) 0.0631 (7) C20 −0.08692 (19) 0.2776 (2) 0.0909 (2) 0.0928 (11)

H20A −0.0720 0.3155 0.0400 0.139*

H20B −0.1454 0.2869 0.1121 0.139*

H20C −0.0819 0.2239 0.0652 0.139*

C3 0.09410 (19) 0.07824 (17) 0.3143 (2) 0.0713 (8) C30 0.0465 (3) 0.0223 (2) 0.3825 (3) 0.1097 (13)

(6)

H30B 0.0842 −0.0207 0.4021 0.165*

H30C −0.0031 0.0006 0.3489 0.165*

C34 0.1382 (2) 0.04789 (18) 0.2328 (2) 0.0874 (10)

H34 0.1323 −0.0067 0.2191 0.105*

C4 0.1899 (2) 0.09232 (18) 0.1710 (2) 0.0687 (8) C40 0.2398 (2) 0.0525 (2) 0.0882 (2) 0.1090 (12)

H40A 0.2351 0.0843 0.0292 0.163*

H40B 0.2165 −0.0001 0.0762 0.163*

H40C 0.2996 0.0479 0.1067 0.163*

C5 0.30280 (18) 0.29429 (18) 0.36737 (18) 0.0641 (7) C50 0.3605 (2) 0.2859 (2) 0.4569 (2) 0.0983 (11)

H50A 0.3440 0.3249 0.5059 0.147*

H50B 0.4196 0.2948 0.4378 0.147*

H50C 0.3546 0.2328 0.4839 0.147*

C56 0.3225 (2) 0.34965 (19) 0.2937 (2) 0.0848 (9)

H56 0.3735 0.3789 0.3006 0.102*

C6 0.2732 (2) 0.36462 (16) 0.2120 (2) 0.0715 (8) C60 0.3030 (3) 0.4242 (2) 0.1347 (3) 0.1221 (15)

H60A 0.2960 0.4012 0.0699 0.183*

H60B 0.3629 0.4368 0.1454 0.183*

H60C 0.2691 0.4724 0.1395 0.183*

O1 0.07705 (12) 0.32206 (10) 0.35069 (12) 0.0639 (5) O2 0.04379 (11) 0.24907 (11) 0.17215 (12) 0.0639 (5) O3 0.09151 (13) 0.15212 (11) 0.33728 (13) 0.0676 (5) O4 0.20162 (11) 0.16752 (11) 0.17940 (12) 0.0628 (5) O5 0.23767 (12) 0.24903 (11) 0.36504 (11) 0.0629 (4) O6 0.20096 (12) 0.33224 (10) 0.19387 (12) 0.0627 (5) V1 0.14153 (3) 0.24589 (2) 0.26686 (3) 0.04841 (14)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

(7)

supporting information

sup-5

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m157–m158

O2 0.0572 (10) 0.0844 (13) 0.0502 (10) 0.0034 (10) 0.0023 (7) −0.0079 (9) O3 0.0838 (13) 0.0585 (11) 0.0606 (11) −0.0119 (10) 0.0159 (9) 0.0029 (9) O4 0.0683 (12) 0.0633 (11) 0.0568 (10) 0.0062 (9) 0.0126 (8) −0.0058 (9) O5 0.0677 (11) 0.0739 (11) 0.0471 (9) −0.0018 (10) −0.0016 (8) 0.0092 (9) O6 0.0695 (12) 0.0643 (11) 0.0545 (9) −0.0074 (9) −0.0014 (9) 0.0149 (9) V1 0.0532 (2) 0.0484 (2) 0.0436 (2) −0.0010 (2) 0.00513 (16) −0.00006 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—O1 1.267 (3) C40—H40A 0.9600

C1—C12 1.376 (4) C40—H40B 0.9600

C1—C10 1.516 (3) C40—H40C 0.9600

C10—H10A 0.9600 C5—O5 1.257 (3)

C10—H10B 0.9600 C5—C56 1.389 (4)

C10—H10C 0.9600 C5—C50 1.508 (4)

C12—C2 1.388 (4) C50—H50A 0.9600

C12—H12 0.9300 C50—H50B 0.9600

C2—O2 1.266 (3) C50—H50C 0.9600

C2—C20 1.497 (4) C56—C6 1.363 (4)

C20—H20A 0.9600 C56—H56 0.9300

C20—H20B 0.9600 C6—O6 1.263 (3)

C20—H20C 0.9600 C6—C60 1.511 (4)

C3—O3 1.267 (3) C60—H60A 0.9600

C3—C34 1.390 (4) C60—H60B 0.9600

C3—C30 1.501 (4) C60—H60C 0.9600

C30—H30A 0.9600 O1—V1 1.9688 (17)

C30—H30B 0.9600 O2—V1 1.9793 (17)

C30—H30C 0.9600 O3—V1 1.9825 (17)

C34—C4 1.370 (4) O4—V1 1.9881 (16)

C34—H34 0.9300 O5—V1 1.9912 (18)

C4—O4 1.268 (3) O6—V1 1.9683 (17)

C4—C40 1.510 (4)

O1—C1—C12 124.7 (2) O5—C5—C56 123.7 (3) O1—C1—C10 114.2 (3) O5—C5—C50 116.0 (3) C12—C1—C10 121.0 (3) C56—C5—C50 120.4 (3)

C1—C10—H10A 109.5 C5—C50—H50A 109.5

C1—C10—H10B 109.5 C5—C50—H50B 109.5

H10A—C10—H10B 109.5 H50A—C50—H50B 109.5

C1—C10—H10C 109.5 C5—C50—H50C 109.5

H10A—C10—H10C 109.5 H50A—C50—H50C 109.5 H10B—C10—H10C 109.5 H50B—C50—H50C 109.5 C1—C12—C2 125.2 (3) C6—C56—C5 125.3 (3)

C1—C12—H12 117.4 C6—C56—H56 117.3

C2—C12—H12 117.4 C5—C56—H56 117.3

(8)

C2—C20—H20A 109.5 C6—C60—H60A 109.5

C2—C20—H20B 109.5 C6—C60—H60B 109.5

H20A—C20—H20B 109.5 H60A—C60—H60B 109.5

C2—C20—H20C 109.5 C6—C60—H60C 109.5

H20A—C20—H20C 109.5 H60A—C60—H60C 109.5 H20B—C20—H20C 109.5 H60B—C60—H60C 109.5 O3—C3—C34 124.1 (3) C1—O1—V1 128.90 (17) O3—C3—C30 115.7 (3) C2—O2—V1 129.61 (17) C34—C3—C30 120.1 (3) C3—O3—V1 129.20 (18)

C3—C30—H30A 109.5 C4—O4—V1 129.24 (18)

C3—C30—H30B 109.5 C5—O5—V1 129.00 (17)

H30A—C30—H30B 109.5 C6—O6—V1 128.74 (17)

C3—C30—H30C 109.5 O6—V1—O1 93.14 (8)

H30A—C30—H30C 109.5 O6—V1—O2 90.73 (7) H30B—C30—H30C 109.5 O1—V1—O2 88.18 (7) C4—C34—C3 124.9 (3) O6—V1—O3 174.40 (8)

C4—C34—H34 117.5 O1—V1—O3 91.87 (8)

C3—C34—H34 117.5 O2—V1—O3 91.92 (8)

O4—C4—C34 124.0 (3) O6—V1—O4 87.87 (7) O4—C4—C40 115.2 (3) O1—V1—O4 177.41 (8) C34—C4—C40 120.7 (3) O2—V1—O4 89.42 (7)

C4—C40—H40A 109.5 O3—V1—O4 87.23 (8)

C4—C40—H40B 109.5 O6—V1—O5 88.07 (7)

H40A—C40—H40B 109.5 O1—V1—O5 88.73 (7)

C4—C40—H40C 109.5 O2—V1—O5 176.62 (7)

H40A—C40—H40C 109.5 O3—V1—O5 89.54 (8) H40B—C40—H40C 109.5 O4—V1—O5 93.69 (7)

(9)

supporting information

sup-7

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m157–m158

Figure

Figure 1The molecule of (I) showing the labelling scheme. Non-H atoms are shown as 50% probability ellipsoids

References

Related documents

In this paper we shed more light to the contested literature on the resource curse hypothesis, by estimating a panel VAR approach along with panel generalised impulse response

(a) The endogenous factors specific to the East EU regions, being presented by the specialized literature in the form of driving forces (driving elements). In

Defensive Intentions Motivate Retaliatory and Preemptive Intergroup Aggression.. Robert Böhm 1 *, Hannes Rusch 2,3 , Özgür

Negli Stati Uniti, la contrazione del prodotto potenziale si è accompagnata alla diminuzione del rapporto tra occupati e popolazione e con la riduzione

the choice systems of systemic grammar, concentrating on grammatical knowledge without fully realizing the 'deli- cate' choices between elements of what systemicists

The model allows body weight to affect non-monetary costs, switching costs, and distribution of wages for each occupation; and also allows individuals’ employment decisions to

Keywords: Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, type 2 diabetes, long non-coding RNAs, insulin

To com- plete the presentation, Appendix A shows that left- to-right parsing in time independent of the size of the lexicon is indeed possible when an