• No results found

Health Care Homes: Minnesota Health Care Programs (MHCP) Feefor-Service. Methodology

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Health Care Homes: Minnesota Health Care Programs (MHCP) Feefor-Service. Methodology"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Health Care Homes:

Minnesota Health Care Programs (MHCP)

Fee-for-Service Care Coordination Rate

Methodology

(2)

Introduction and Background

Minnesota’s 2008 Health Reform legislation calls for the creation of a certification process for Health Care Homes (HCH), as well as a system of per-person risk-stratified care coordination payments to certified Health Care Homes. These payments must be made for all Minnesota Health Care Program (MHCP) enrollees, state employees, and state-regulated private health plan products. The payment methodology, including a system of categorizing patient complexity, clinic and payer payment processes, and consumer/patient recommendations, was designed with extensive

stakeholder input throughout 2009.

In order to implement the care coordination payments in MHCP, the Department of Human Services considered the overall design of the Health Care Home payment methodology and developed dollar amounts for the care coordination payments in the fee-for-service public programs. The information that follows lays out the rationale for the development of these rates. These dollar amounts are subject to approval by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) through the Medicaid State Plan Amendment process, and represent only what will be proposed to CMS. All care

coordination rates outside of MHCP will be negotiated privately.

Complexity Tiers

The payment rates are based on a complexity tiering structure in which providers will identify and count the number of “major” conditions (conditions that are chronic, severe, and likely to require a care team). Based on claims data, DHS has modeled the following distribution in MHCP fee-for-service:

Distribution of Member Months by Count of Major Condition Groups - Fee-for-Service MHCP Population

State Fiscal Year 2008

50% 9% 12% 17% 0 (Tier 0) 1-3 (Tier 1) 4-6 (Tier 2) 7-9 (Tier 3) 10+ (Tier 4) Count of M ajor Condition Groups

(3)

Total cost values for each tier in fee-for-service are displayed below. These figures represent actual medical, long-term care, and waivered service expenditures.

Comparison of PMPM Total Costs by Count of Major Condition Groups

Fee-for-Service MHCP Population - SFY 2008

$542 $1,454 $2,112 $2,877 $1,787 $2,076 $1,060 $672 $478 $127 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500

0 1-3 (Tier 1) 4-6 (Tier 2) 7-9 (Tier 3) 10+ (Tier 4)

Count of Major Condition Groups

PM PM Total C o st s Mean Cost Median Cost

For comparative purposes, the same distribution was modeled for the MHCP managed care population to illustrate how the tiering system looks in a population with a lower disease burden.

Distribution of Member Months by Count of Major Condition Groups- Managed Care MHCP Population

State Fiscal Year 2008

7% 9% 7% 4% 73% 0 (Tier 0) 1-3 (Tier 1) 4-6 (Tier 2) 7-9 (Tier 3) 10+ (Tier 4) Count of M ajor Condition Groups

(4)

Care Coordination Time Assumptions and Rates

The count of major conditions serves as a proxy for the time and work required to coordinate patient care in the HCH. In order to arrive at rates, we must start with a reimbursement value for a time unit of care coordination and then make assumptions about the amount of care coordination time and work per member per month (PMPM) for each tier. These assumptions were informed by a survey of the best available literature on care coordination.

DHS began with the current reimbursement for a 40-60 minute evaluation and management (E&M) visit (CPT code 99215 = $65.92)1 as the base value for one hour of physician work. Because the work of care coordination in a HCH is divided between the physician and other members of the care team, DHS assumed the following distribution of work in an optimally-functioning practice:

20% Physician

50% Care Coordinator

30% Office/Clerical

After discounting for this work distribution over time (care coordinator time at 65% of the physician rate and office/clerical time at 30%), the MHCP fee-for-service rate for one hour of care coordination in a HCH is $40.54.

DHS proposes paying a PMPM care coordination rate for patients in Tiers 1-4: the roughly 50% of the fee-for-service population with one or more major chronic conditions) based on the following literature-supported assumptions regarding the work of care coordination:

Tier Minutes of Work PMPM PMPM Rate 0 N/A N/A 1 15 $ 10.14 2 30 $ 20.27 3 60 $ 40.54 4 90 $ 60.81

The adjusted average PMPM rate for Tiers 1-4 is $31.39.

There will also be a 15% increase in the rate for each tier for patients that have:

• A primary language other than English

• A serious and persistent mental illness

(For instance, a Tier 1 patient who also has a serious and persistent mental illness would have a rate of $11.66, and a Tier 1 patient with both a serious and persistent mental illness and a primary language other than English would have a rate of $13.18.) Based on DHS claims data, these “supplemental” complexity factors will increase the care coordination payments across the

(5)

fee-for-Works Consulted

AMA/Specialty Society RVS Update Committee Medicare Medical Home Demonstration Project (AMA). RUC Recommendations for the Medicare Medical Home Demonstration Project. American Medical Association, April 25, 2008. Downloaded on March 13, 2009 from

www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/380/medicalhomerecommend.pdf.

Antonelli RC, Antonelli DM. Providing a medical home: the cost of care coordination services in a community-based, general pediatric practice. Pediatrics 113(5 suppl):1522-1528, 2004.

Antonelli RC, Stille CJ, Antonelli DM. Care coordination for children and youth with special health care needs: a descriptive, multi-site study of activities, personnel costs, and outcomes. Pediatrics

(122):e209-e216, 2008.

Nfor T, Castellano S. Measuring Care Coordination Provided to Children with Special Health Care Needs by Providers in the Minnesota Medical Home Learning Collaborative. St. Paul, MN:

References

Related documents

For research question one, the Ohio Achievement Assessment in mathematics and reading was used to examine the influence of extended learning time participation on urban

Lipin-1 is a nuclear protein that is essen- tial in adipocyte differentiation and it is considered to play a role in ectopic fat deposition and the redistribution of fat. The aim

C) The actual weight of the object is slightly more than 30 N, due to the buoyant force of the air. D) The actual weight of the object is slightly less than 30 N, due to the

– A railroad carrier engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, a contractor or a subcontractor of such a railroad carrier, or an officer or employee of such a railroad carrier,

This was to determine the overall financial performance as a result of foreign exchange trading over a range of time period.All the banks financial statements analysed in this

  The  least  profitable  place  to  be  in  any  hand  of  poker  is  in  one  of  the  blinds.    The  blinds 

The ways in which the teachers perceived and assessed the conditions and the process of the prisoners’ education were related to their understanding of the learners as prisoners,

Intensive two-week orientation and training. While the original plan being developed by the collaborative partners envisioned a multiyear training program the funding that was secured