• No results found

Green Car Technology & Energy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Green Car Technology & Energy"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

GREEN CAR

Technology & Energy

Piengjai Keawsuwan Piengjai Keawsuwan

(2)

What’s “GREEN CAR” ?

What s GREEN CAR ?

environmentally friendly cars Low-pollution vehicle

(3)

What’s “GREEN CAR” ?

What s GREEN CAR ?

(4)

Why “Green car” is in trend?

Why Green car is in trend?

• Green house effects

• Emission + CO2

• Fossil  Crude oil

How to reduce CO2

?

How to reduce CO2

?

(5)

How much space a ton of CO

2 ? ?

would take up ?

? ? 27 ft

(6)

How to reduce CO

2

?

How to reduce CO

2

?

• Alternative Energy : Ethanol, Bio-diesel • Vehicle Standard regulation: UNECE,

Global Technical Regulation Global Technical Regulation

• The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders has released new y data that shows the average new car CO2 figure fell 4.7% in first half of 2010 to 145.2g/km

(7)

Emission standards Emission standards EU EURO V EU EURO V RUSSIA EURO IV CHINA EURO IV AUSTRALIA EURO IV AUSTRALIA EURO IV ARGENTINA EURO IV THAILAND INDIA EURO III EURO III

INDIA EURO III

• EURO IV : CO2 ~ 120 gm / km

(8)
(9)

Reducing CO

Reducing CO2 2 : Triple Layered Approach: Triple Layered Approach

Comprehensive approaches through Vehicle, Driver and Society to achieve sustainable mobility society effectively.

Reduce congestion y y y y 最速ルート 最速ルート Fastest route New transportation, and mobility net-working

Support ECO-drive

Eco meter SocietySociety

Eco meter Eco-advice

Eco-pedal DriverDriver

Vehicle Vehicle

Engine/Transmission

HEV EV FCV

HEV, EV, FCV

(10)

Long Term Goal for CO

Long Term Goal for CO2

2 Reduction

Reduction

Long Term Goal for CO

Long Term Goal for CO2

2 Reduction

Reduction

100 100 h eel ) 60 80 60 80 ll T o W h ions (% ) Source) 450ppm e duce 40 60 40 60 car ’s W e O 2 emiss Source) IPCC* E lectricity Hy drogen 90% R e 20 20 New c C O enewable E R enewable 0 2000 2010 2050 0 HEV EV FCV ICE 2020 2030 2040

IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

R R

(11)

Nissan New MARCH Eco

Nissan New MARCH Eco--Technology

Technology

New MARCH achieve Top-Class of

Fuel Economy & Emission level y & as the first Eco-Car in Thailand.

Regulation MARCH

Fuel economy 5L/100km 5L/100km

Safety UNECE regulation 94 and 95 UNECE regulation 94 and 95

Emission level Euro 4 and C02 أ 120g/km Euro 4 and C02 أ120g/km Engine Gasoline أ 1 3L Diesel أ

Engine

displacement Gasoline أ 1.3L Diesel أ1.4L Gasoline 1.2L

(12)

Focused technologies: Electric Vehicle Focused technologies: Electric Vehicle Focused technologies: Electric Vehicle Focused technologies: Electric Vehicle

Pull ahead EV, Zero emission vehicle

2010 (US/JPN)

Li i B tt Li-ion Batt.

Nissan EV proto ‘08 Nissan Leaf

Size 5 door hatchback

Capacity 5 passengers

Driving

Range More than 160 km/h (LA4)

B tt L i t d Li i b tt

Battery Laminated Li-ion battery

Motor High response type

(13)

Government Policy

Government Policy

Objective of MNRE  Reduce pollution

Objective of MOE  reduce spending,

promote alternative energy energy promote alternative energy, energy saving

Objective of MOI  enhance Eco-Car with

E t h l i f i dl

Eco technology, energy saving, friendly

environment, safety  Ecology car 2nd

(14)

Government Policy

Government Policy

Objective of MOF  Incentive enhancement

No. Items c.c. Tax Rate

1 Passenger Car

Objective of MOF  Incentive enhancement

1 Passenger Car Passenger Car ≤2000 30% 2000-2500 35% 2500-3000 40% 1.1 >3000 50% 1.2 PPV ≤3250 20% >3250 50% 1.3 Passenger Car * (Modify from Pickup)

≤3250 3%

>3250 50%

Passenger Car

≤2000 25%

2000-2500 30% 1.4 (Comply with Passenger CarE20) 2000-2500 30% 2500-3000 35% >3000 50% >1780-2000 22% 1.5 (Comply with Passenger CarE85) 2000-2500 27%

2500-3000 32% >3000 50%

(15)

Government Policy

y

Objective of MOF  Incentive enhancement

No. Items c.c. Tax Rate

2 Commercial Car j 2 Commercial Car 2.1 Single Cab ≤3250 3 >3250 50 ≤3250 3 2.2 King Cab ≤3250 3 >3250 50 2 3 Pickup-Double Cab ≤3250 12 >3250 50 2.3 >3250 50

3 Energy Saving Vehicle

Hybrid ≤3000 10

3.1 >3000 50

3.2 Electric 10

Fuel Cell

3.3 10

3.4 Eco-Car Gasoline<1,300 cc.Diesel<1,400 cc. 17

(16)

Proposal : Government Policy

Proposal : Government Policy

• Certainty, practical, grace period, fairness • Linkage of government policy-synchronize • All energy criteria are important ethanol • All energy criteria are important ,ethanol,

(17)

Proposal : Government Policy

Proposal : Government Policy

• Infrastructure : E20, E85,, B3-5, BHD,

BTL, CNG , ……..EV

E20 : car ~557,000 370 stationsCNG : car ~190,000  480 stations

(18)

Thank You

(19)
(20)

No. Items c.c. Tax Rate 1 Passenger Car ≤2000 30% 1.1 Passenger Car ≤2000 30% 2000-2500 35% 2500-3000 40% >3000 50% 1.2 PPV ≤3250 20% >3250 50% 1 3 Passenger Car * (Modify from Pickup)

≤3250 3%

>3250 50% 1.3 (Modify from Pickup) >3250 50%

1.4 (Comply with E20)Passenger Car

≤2000 25% 2000-2500 30% 2500-3000 35% 2500 3000 35% >3000 50%

1 5 (Comply with E85)Passenger Car

>1780-2000 22% 2000-2500 27% 1.5 (Comply with E85)

2500-3000 32% >3000 50%

(21)

No. Items c.c. Tax Rate 2 Commercial Car 2.1 Single Cab ≤3250 3 >3250 50 King Cab ≤3250 3 2.2 King Cab >3250 50 2.3 Pickup-Double Cab ≤3250 12 >3250 50

3 Energy Saving Vehicle 3 Energy Saving Vehicle

3.1 Hybrid ≤3000 10 >3000 50 3 2 Electric 10 3.2 Electric 10 3.4 Fuel Cell

Eco-Car Gasoline<1,300 cc.Diesel<1,400 cc. 17 10 3.3

(22)

แผนเอทานอลและไบโอดีเซล 15 ป

วางแผนการบริหารจัดการตามแผนพลังงานทดแทน 15 ป พ.ศ. 2551 – 2565 ั้ (ป ี่ ไ  1. แผนระยะสัน (ปที 1-5) พ.ศ. 2551 - 2555 (ค.ศ. 2008 – 2012) ได คํานึงถึงสถานการณในปจจุบันเพื่อแกไขปญหาพลังงานที่มีราคาแพง  ไ โดยการสงเสริมการผลิต การใช เอทานอลและไบโอดีเซล 2.แผนระยะยาว (ปที่ 6 – 15) พ.ศ. 2556 – 2565 (ค.ศ. 2013 – 2022) ได คํานึงถึงการใชเชื้อเพลิงชีวมวล (Biomass to Liquid - BTL) การผลิตเอ ทานอลจากพืชอื่นที่ไมใชอาหาร เชน ขาวฟางหวาน เซลลูโลส สาหราย ู เปนตน และสงเสริมการศึกษาวิจัย เชน การใชกาซไฮโดรเจน (H2 ) ,

เซลเชื้อเพลิง (Fuel cell)( ) , , และเทคโนโลยีรถยนต Electric car ควบคู

(23)

• ลดการนําเขาน้ํามันดิบ จากการทดแทน

ของ Gasohol และ Biodiesel

ของ Gasohol และ Biodiesel

• รักษาระดับราคาผลผลิตทางการเกษตร

• รักษาสิ่งแวดลอม ลดภาวะโลกรอน

• เพิ่มมลคาใหกับผลผลิตทางการเกษตร

• เพมมูลคาใหกบผลผลตทางการเกษตร

• เรียนรูการพึ่งพาตนเอง และสราง

ความมั่นคงในการจัดหาพลังงาน

(24)
(25)

Government consumer incentives : EV

Country Government incentive

Japan Yen 770 K (50% of price gap between EV and ICE)

USA $7,500 (tax credit) Up to 200K veh./manufacturer

California $5,000 Georgia (Atlanta) $5,000 Oregon $1,500

France €5,000

UK £5,000

Belgium Tax reduction of 30% with maximum of €6,500

China RMB 60 K (within 5 EV model cities in China)

HKG 0% registration tax

Ireland €5,000

Denmark 0% registration tax

Including “2010 forecast”

Approx.▲€30,000 vs. 2.0L 80kW Diesel

(26)

Support Eco

Support Eco--driving Potential

driving Potential

• Fuel consumption varies a lot among drivers

• Support Eco-driving can help to reduce CO2 by shifting drivers from ‘Lower efficiency’ to ‘Higher efficiency’

800 example: Compact car in Japan 400 600 u ency in Japan Eco-driving 200 400 Freq u 0 200 10 20 30 40 (mpg) Fuel Economy 10 20 30 40 (mpg) Better

(drive w/high efficiency) Worse

(drive w/low efficiency)

References

Related documents

If the care under Description points 1 - 4 is provided by a care provider with whom we have not concluded a contract, the costs of care per treatment (session) are reimbursed up to

Once a common understanding of historical records graphs was reached, probabilities and risks for specific climate events that are re- levant for decision making (for instance,

Shedd plans to pursue a PGY-2 pharmacy residency and a career in clinical pharmacy with a focus in critical care or emergency medicine.. Email:

Table 4.12: Rating of the organizations HIV/AIDS EWP 34 Table 4.13: Ease of accessing help and information on HIV/AIDS &amp; HIV/AIDS EWP 35 Table 4.14: The workplace as a

Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Philadelphia, PA.. Addressing the First Tier: The Measurement of Instruction

We set up a model to study how ownership structure, corporate law and employment law interact to set the incentives that infl uence the decision by the large shareholder or

Security issues and currently available solutions, various types of attacks like - attacks on routing and DoS attack, injecting false packets, attacks on real time