• No results found

A National Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Resources in the United States

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A National Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Resources in the United States"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

A National Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Resources in the

United States

Folafoluwa O. Odetola, MD*‡; Sarah J. Clark, MPH‡; Gary L. Freed, MD, MPH‡; Susan L. Bratton, MD, MPH*; and Matthew M. Davis, MD, MAPP‡§㛳

ABSTRACT. Objective. To characterize resources available for the care of critically ill and injured children in the United States.

Study Design. In January through May 2004, we con-ducted a cross-sectional survey of medical directors of intensive care facilities for children.

Results. Pediatric critical care medical directors from 257 of 337 eligible hospitals responded to the survey (response rate: 76%). The median number of beds was 12 (interquartile range: 8 –17 beds), with a median of 58 admissions per PICU bed (interquartile range: 44 –70 ad-missions per PICU bed) in 2003. The median numbers of admissions per PICU bed were not statistically different among PICUs of different sizes. Fewer than 6% of hos-pitals shared PICU space with space for critically ill adults. The smallest units (1– 6 beds) had higher physi-cian and nurse staffing ratios per PICU bed. Advanced therapeutic technology, particularly renal replacement and inhaled nitric oxide therapy, was significantly more likely to be available in larger PICUs (>7 beds).

Conclusions. PICUs with the fewest beds had higher physician and nurse staffing ratios per PICU bed and lower resource capacity for high-intensity renal and re-spiratory therapy. The impact of PICU resource availabil-ity on referral patterns and outcomes of pediatric critical illnesses warrants additional study. Pediatrics 2005; 115:e382–e386. URL: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/ peds.2004-1920;pediatric intensive care units, nurses, phy-sicians, medical devices, health facilities.

ABBREVIATIONS. IQR, interquartile range; AHA, American Hos-pital Association.

P

ediatric intensive care facilities support the medical needs of children at risk of imminent death resulting from acute illness or injury, but not all intensive care settings provide equivalent care. Care of more severely ill and injured children in a tertiary medical center PICU has been associated

with lower odds of death, compared with care in a nontertiary pediatric critical care setting.1This con-trast raises questions about the staffing and techno-logic capacities of pediatric critical care resources and how they are distributed across the United States.

A recently published analysis of pediatric critical care resources through 2001 found that the number of PICU beds in the United States has increased since 1995, beyond what would be expected on the basis of population growth.2 A concurrent study of data based on the annual American Hospital Association (AHA) survey illustrated that PICU facilities were available in only 9% of US counties, predominantly in urban areas.3 Uneven distribution of PICU re-sources despite an apparent increase in the overall supply over time raises questions about access to timely appropriate care for critically ill and injured children.

To facilitate characterization of US PICUs, 2 levels of PICU care have been defined. Critically ill children who require services not available or infrequently used in level II PICUs are referred to level I PICUs, with higher levels of subspecialist and technologic support.4 Delineation of the available resources for the care of critically ill and injured children is a first step in evaluating the adequacy and efficiency of PICU care. This study was conducted to describe the availability and characteristics of facilities for criti-cally ill and injured children across the United States in 2004.

METHODS Sample

The initial sampling frame included all hospitals that reported having PICU facilities on the AHA 2001 annual survey, the most recent, publicly available data at the initiation of the study in 2003. Additional hospitals listed through the National Association of Children’s Hospitals and Related Institutions,5the Virtual

Pediat-ric Intensive Care Unit,6or the Shriners Hospitals for Children7

were contacted via telephone to ascertain the availability of facil-ities for critically ill and injured children. Through this process, 337 hospitals were identified as having facilities for the care of critically ill and injured children; these units included PICUs, burn ICUs, and ICUs for orthopedic and spinal injuries (Fig 1). We excluded NICUs. Of note, certain hospitals listed in the AHA annual survey as having PICU facilities did not in fact have such facilities when they were contacted by the authors, and this is one of the reasons why the study sample differed from that in a recent study by Randolph et al.2

Survey Design

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Michigan Medical School. A 1-page survey was

From the *Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, ‡Child Health Evaluation and Re-search Unit, and §Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and㛳Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Accepted for publication Nov 15, 2004. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1920

No conflict of interest declared.

Dr Bratton’s current address is: Department of Pediatrics, Primary Chil-dren’s Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT.

(2)

designed to collect information on unit characteristics, including the unit size, patient volume, nurse staffing, and capacity to im-plement certain therapeutic modalities. Specific data on physician characteristics included the presence and number of pediatric intensivists, hours of daily in-house pediatric intensivist coverage, and presence of 24-hour coverage by pediatric intensivists.

Survey Administration

The medical director for each PICU was identified through Internet information or through hospital telephone operators. Sur-veys, accompanied by a personalized cover letter, were sent via surface mail to PICU medical directors. A second mailing was sent to nonrespondents 8 weeks later. At study conclusion, all nonre-sponding hospitals were contacted via telephone in an attempt to verify the presence of a unit for the care of critically ill children other than preterm neonates and to ascertain the number of beds therein. Survey administration occurred from January through May 2004.

Data Analyses

All analyses were conducted with Stata 7 for Windows (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed to describe the responses obtained regarding the dis-tribution of pediatric critical care facilities, physician and nursing supply, and technologic capacity. Pearson’s␹2test was used for

bivariate comparison of proportions, and the Kruskal-Wallis test

was used for comparison of nonparametric continuous data among PICU categories. A 2-tailed␣level of .05 was used as the threshold for statistical significance.

RESULTS Characteristics of PICU Facilities

Of 337 eligible hospitals, 257 hospitals responded to the survey (response rate: 76%). Nonrespondents did not differ significantly from respondents in terms of distribution according to census region or PICU size.

All respondents reported a unit within the hospital for the care of critically ill or injured children. The median number of beds per PICU was 12 (interquar-tile range [IQR]: 8 –17 beds). There were more admis-sions in PICUs with larger numbers of beds; how-ever, the number of admissions per PICU bed was not statistically different among PICUs of different bed size categories (Table 1). Twenty-five PICUs re-ported having a separate cardiac care area; these areas were located primarily among PICUs withⱖ12 beds.

(3)

PICU Staffing

Overall, pediatric intensivists were present in 94% of the PICUs, although they were less common in the smallest (1– 6-bed) units (82%), in comparison with PICUs withⱖ7 beds (P⬍ .01). The supply of pedi-atric intensivists and nurses increased with increas-ing numbers of PICU beds. However, when results were adjusted for the number of PICU beds, there was a decrease in pediatric intensivist/bed ratios and nurse/bed ratios as the number of beds in-creased (P ⬍ .01) (Table 1). Pediatric intensivists provided coverage in these PICUs for a median of 12 hours (IQR: 12–15 hours) during the day. They also provided 24-hour coverage in 68% of the units over-all; this proportion increased with the number of PICU beds (Table 1). Fourteen PICUs (5.5%) had no pediatric intensivists on staff. The nurse/patient ra-tios were similar among all of the units.

Available Therapeutic Modalities

Nearly 100% of PICUs reported a capacity for me-chanical ventilation and invasive monitoring of arte-rial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, and central venous pressure. Less than 80% of all PICUs had facilities for renal replacement or nitric oxide therapy (Table 2), with the availability of advanced therapies increasing with the size of the PICU (P⬍.01) (Table 3).

Coresident PICUs

Fourteen hospitals (5.5%) had facilities for criti-cally ill adult and pediatric patients within the same area. These PICUs had a median number of 4.5 pe-diatric beds (IQR: 2–10 beds). Eleven of the units had at least 1 pediatric intensivist, with 24-hour coverage

by a pediatric intensivist occurring in 8 of the units. All had the capacity to provide mechanical ventila-tion and vascular pressure and intracranial pressure monitoring for their pediatric patients. Hemodialy-sis, hemofiltration, and nitric oxide therapy could be performed in fewer settings (71%, 57%, and 79% of the PICUs, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Our study follows reports detailing the growth of pediatric critical care resources in the United States with time1,2 and, in a rapidly evolving field, is the most recent national attempt to describe in detail the various settings in which care for critically ill and injured children is coordinated currently. Further-more, this is the first report of “coresidence,” in which care of critically ill and injured adults and children is conducted within the same setting. We also report a significant difference in the availability of advanced technology as a function of the number of PICU beds, with the larger PICUs (ⱖ7 beds) hav-ing such technology available more often. The small-est units (1– 6 beds) had the lowsmall-est availability of advanced therapeutic modalities but had higher ra-tios of nurses and physicians to beds.

Pediatric intensivists represented part of the health care delivery team in 94% of the PICUs in our survey. This is similar to findings reported recently2and is a significant increase over the results of the first na-tional survey of PICU resources conducted in 1989, which reported this practice for 73% of the PICUs surveyed.8 Studies in both the adult and pediatric literature have indicated that staffing ICUs with in-tensivists may improve outcomes9–12 and decrease resource use by reducing inappropriate admissions, preventing complications of care, and ensuring prompt discharge.10,12 We observed that smaller units (1– 6 beds) had higher pediatric intensivist/bed ratios than did larger units. In a study of outcomes according to PICU status, Pollack et al9 reported similar differences in resource availability, with non-tertiary units providing more labor-intensive care and tertiary PICUs demonstrating greater availabil-ity of technology. Children in the higher strata of critical illness had a greater likelihood of death in the nontertiary settings, despite higher provider/patient ratios.

To improve the quality of care provided in the

TABLE 1. Organizational Characteristics of Pediatric Critical Care Services Aggregate

(n⫽257)

PICU Size (No. of Beds) P

1–6 (n⫽60) 7–12 (n⫽90) 13–18 (n⫽55) ⱖ19 (n⫽52)

Admissions in year 2003* 662 (372–1050) 300 (150–372) 500 (400–700) 900 (761–1200) 1400 (1200–1650) ⬍.01 Admissions per bed* 58.6 (45.0–70.0) 57.3 (37.8–70.0) 56.3 (43.6–67.7) 62.5 (50.5–75.0) 62.5 (52.5–69.1) .09 No. of pediatric intensivists* 4 (2–5) 2 (2–3) 3 (2–4) 4 (4–5) 6 (5–8) ⬍.01 Pediatric intensivist/bed* 0.30 (0.24–0.38) 0.40 (0.33–0.50) 0.30 (0.25–0.38) 0.29 (0.22–0.33) 0.27 (0.23–0.30) ⬍.01 No. with 24-h intensivist

coverage (%)

176/257 (68) 32/60 (53) 65/90 (72) 39/55 (71) 40/52 (77) .03

Nurse/patient ratio 1:2 1:2 1:2 1:2 1:2 NS

PICU nurse/bed ratio* 2.9 (2.2–3.8) 3.3 (2.2–4.7) 2.5 (2.0–3.7) 2.7 (2.1–3.5) 3.2 (2.6–4.2) ⬍.01

No. with separate cardiac ICU 25 1 2 10 12 ⬍.01

Pearson’s␹2and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons of categorical and continuous data, respectively. NS indicates not

significant.

* Values reported as median and IQR.

TABLE 2. Availability of Therapeutic Modalities in PICU Set-tings

Modality No. of

PICUs

Proportion of PICUs, %

Mechanical ventilation 257 100.0

Invasive arterial BP monitoring 256 99.6 Central venous pressure monitoring 255 99.2

ICP monitoring 241 93.8

Inhaled nitric oxide therapy 199 77.4

Hemodialysis 195 75.9

Hemofiltration 187 72.8

(4)

intensive care setting, timely access to care by an intensivist has been advocated by the Society for Critical Care Medicine13 and the Leapfrog Group.14 The latter organization has advocated that, in hospi-tals with either adult ICUs or PICUs, intensivists manage or comanage the care of critically ill patients, be present during daytime hours, and be easily ac-cessible at other times. In our study, pediatric inten-sivists provided coverage in the PICU for an average of 12 daily hours.

The optimal duration of daily coverage by inten-sivists in the PICU is not known, and a clear associ-ation between the durassoci-ation of coverage and patient outcomes in the PICU has not yet been described. However, 24-hour coverage of PICUs by intensivists has been associated with improved outcomes.15We report 24-hour coverage of the PICU in more two thirds of the responding hospitals in our study, a substantial increase from the 1989 survey, which documented such practice in⬃50% of the units sur-veyed.8Additional research is warranted to elucidate the impact of physician staffing models, particularly the duration of daily coverage, on patient outcomes in pediatric critical care.

We observed a nurse/patient ratio of 1:2 in 204 (81%) of the PICUs surveyed. This is consistent with guidelines suggested by the American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force on Models of Crit-ical Care Delivery.13 Although excessive nursing workloads have been associated with burnout, job dissatisfaction, and poor patient outcomes in the ICU,16 the optimal nurse/patient ratio in intensive care remains unclear.17

The intensive care environment often requires the use of invasive devices for monitoring and life sup-port. For adults, the availability and amount of tech-nologic support in an ICU have been associated with reductions in hospital mortality rates.18 We found greater availability of specific advanced technology and therapeutic modalities in PICUs with greater numbers of beds. This distribution merits additional study, focusing on its influence on referral patterns and outcomes for critically ill and injured patients who require these modes of therapy.

Nearly 6% of our responding PICUs reported coresidence of critically ill pediatric patients with critically ill adult patients. Coresident PICUs are of-ten staffed by pediatric inof-tensivists and provide core critical care services but lack other advanced thera-peutic modalities that may influence patient

out-comes. Coresidence may influence the quality and intensity of care for children, as indicated in a prior study that showed shorter severity-adjusted lengths of stay and fewer days of mechanical ventilation for adolescent trauma victims admitted to a PICU, com-pared with an adult surgical ICU.19 Although the number of coresident PICUs is small now, the phe-nomenon of coresidence warrants additional inves-tigation, because constrained fiscal or staffing re-sources may force some smaller facilities that have separate PICU beds currently to consider coresi-dence in the future.

This study has certain limitations. Data reported by the PICU medical directors were self-reported and therefore not subject to verification. This could affect the results in either direction but might be more likely to lead to overestimation of resource availability. We achieved an excellent response rate of 76%, collecting information from all states with pediatric critical care facilities, which strengthens the external validity of our findings. Nevertheless, there could be selection bias resulting from the lack of responses from all eligible PICU sites. To mitigate this shortcoming, we determined the number of beds reserved for critically ill children at each hospital without a survey response, which allowed us to as-certain the count and distribution of facilities across the entire United States.

An additional limitation of our survey was that we were not able to distinguish between PICUs in community settings and those in academic medical centers. Although this distinction is important for understanding the availability of PICU care in com-munities and connections to academic centers that may offer more access to advanced technology, we think that more salient distinctions pertain to pedi-atric intensivist staffing and the availability of renal replacement and advanced respiratory therapies, which we report above.

CONCLUSIONS

As the number of PICU beds in the United States continues to grow, it is essential to understand how the availability of PICU resources may affect the care of critically ill and injured children. In 2004, the availability of PICU resources varied principally ac-cording to the number of PICU beds. The smallest PICUs (1– 6 beds) had higher physician and nurse staffing ratios per PICU bed than did larger PICU settings. In contrast, larger PICUs had significantly

TABLE 3. Availability of Therapeutic Modalities According to PICU Bed Size

Modality PICU Size (No. of Beds) P

1–6 (n⫽60)

7–12 (n⫽90)

13–18 (n⫽55)

ⱖ19 (n⫽52)

ICP monitoring, no. (%) 48 (80) 86 (96) 55 (100) 52 (100) .32 Hemodialysis, no. (%) 24 (40) 69 (77) 52 (95) 50 (96) ⬍.01 Hemofiltration, no. (%) 20 (33) 65 (72) 51 (93) 51 (98) ⬍.01 Nitric oxide therapy, no. (%) 33 (55) 62 (69) 53 (96) 50 (98) ⬍.01

(5)

greater capacity to provide advanced therapies, such as renal replacement and inhaled nitric oxide ther-apy. Future studies should address the relationships of the availability of pediatric critical care facilities to referral patterns and to outcomes of life-threatening pediatric illnesses.

REFERENCES

1. Pollack MM, Alexander SR, Clarke N, Ruttimann UE, Tesselaar HM, Bachulis AC. Improved outcomes from tertiary center pediatric inten-sive care: a statewide comparison of tertiary and nontertiary care facil-ities.Crit Care Med.1991;19:150 –159

2. Randolph AG, Gonzales CA, Cortellini L, Yeh TS. Growth of pediatric intensive care units in the United States from 1995 to 2001.J Pediatr. 2004;144:792–798

3. Odetola FO, Miller WC, Davis M, et al. The relationship between the location of pediatric intensive care unit facilities and child mortality from trauma: a county-level ecologic study.J Pediatr.2005; In press 4. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Hospital Care, Section

on Critical Care, Society of Critical Care Medicine Task Force on Levels of Care for PICUs. Guidelines and levels of care for pediatric intensive care units.Pediatrics.2004;114:1114 –1125

5. National Association of Children’s Hospitals and Related Institutions. Available at: www.childrenshospitals.net/Template.cfm?Section⫽

Hospital_Profile_Search&Template⫽/CustomSource/HospitalProfiles/ HospitalProfileResultNew.cfm&ShowAll⫽1. Accessed September 26, 2003 6. Virtual Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Available at: www.picu.net/

state.php. Accessed September 24, 2003

7. Shriners Hospitals for Children. Available at: www.shrinershq.org/shc. Accessed November 2, 2003

8. Pollack MM, Cuerdon TC, Getson PR. Pediatric intensive care units: results of a national survey.Crit Care Med.1993;21:607– 614

9. Pollack MM, Katz RW, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR. Improving the out-come and efficiency of intensive care: the impact of an intensivist.Crit Care Med.1988;16:11–17

10. Vincent JL. Need for intensivists in intensive care units [editorial]. Lancet.2000;356:695– 696

11. Provonost PJ, Jencks MW, Dorman T, et al. Organizational characteris-tics of intensive care units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery.JAMA.1999;281:1310 –1317

12. Provonost PJ, Angus DC, Dorman T, Robinson KA, Dremsizov TT, Young TL. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review.JAMA.2002;288:2151–2162

13. Brilli RJ, Spevetz A, Branson RD, et al. Critical care delivery in the intensive care unit: defining clinical roles and the best practice model. Crit Care Med.2001;29:2007–2019

14. Birkmeyer JD, Birkmeyer CM, Wennberg DE, Young M. Leapfrog stan-dards 2003: the potential benefits of universal adoption. Available at: www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-Birkmeyer.pdf. Ac-cessed June 3, 2004

15. Goh AY, Lum LC, Abdel-Latif ME. Impact of 24 hour critical care physician staffing on case-mix adjusted mortality in pediatric intensive care.Lancet.2001;357:445– 446

16. UK Neonatal Staffing Study Group. Patient volume, staffing, and work-load in relation to risk-adjusted outcomes in a random stratified sample of UK neonatal intensive care units: a prospective evaluation.Lancet. 2002;359:99 –107

17. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA.2002;288:1987–1993

18. Bastos PG, Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, et al. The importance of tech-nology for achieving superior outcomes from intensive care.Intensive Care Med.1996;22:664 – 669

(6)

DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1920

2005;115;e382

Pediatrics

M. Davis

Folafoluwa O. Odetola, Sarah J. Clark, Gary L. Freed, Susan L. Bratton and Matthew

A National Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Resources in the United States

Services

Updated Information &

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/115/4/e382

including high resolution figures, can be found at:

References

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/115/4/e382#BIBL

This article cites 14 articles, 1 of which you can access for free at:

Subspecialty Collections

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/hospital_medicine_sub Hospital Medicine

sub

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/emergency_medicine_ Emergency Medicine

following collection(s):

This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the

Permissions & Licensing

http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml

in its entirety can be found online at:

Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or

Reprints

http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml

(7)

DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1920

2005;115;e382

Pediatrics

M. Davis

Folafoluwa O. Odetola, Sarah J. Clark, Gary L. Freed, Susan L. Bratton and Matthew

A National Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Resources in the United States

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/115/4/e382

located on the World Wide Web at:

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is

by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1073-0397.

Figure

Fig 1. Participant enrollment in the survey. NACHRI indicates National Association of Children’s Hospitals and Related Institutions.
TABLE 1.Organizational Characteristics of Pediatric Critical Care Services

References

Related documents

The ability to create a consistent and complete view of data assets across the enterprise is becoming ever more paramount as councils seek to understand and make

For identification of the text (words) that will be used for speech segments extraction, selection of existing Macedonian and Albanian words, which contain all

Inverse modeling of soil water content to estimate the hydraulic properties of a shallow soil and the associated weathered bedrock.. Ayral

collaboration  with  relevant  United  Nations  and  international

lines) and disintegration (the ratio between clay content estimated without SOM removal and with removal) (dashed lines) as a function of (a) soil organic carbon (SOC), (b)

To increase the availability of credit to small businesses by eliminating impedi- ments to securitization and facilitating the development of a secondary market in small business

Option to exclude military basic housing allowance for purposes of de- termining income eligibility under low-income housing credit and bond-financed residential

Extension of statute of limitations to file claims for refunds relating to disability determinations by Department of Veterans Affairs.. Credit for employer