• No results found

March 22, 2011 Market Overview: Cloud-Based Vendors

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "March 22, 2011 Market Overview: Cloud-Based Vendors"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Email Vendors

by Christopher Voce

(2)

ExECutIVE SuMMary

Infrastructure and operations executives have shown a tremendous interest in the cloud to provision email and collaboration services to their employees. Why? Cloud-based email and collaboration can be more cost-effective, increase your flexibility, and help control the historical business and technical challenges of deploying these tools yourself. Forrester recently published a report covering four major cloud email platforms. But I&O professionals need to expand their scope to include third-party service providers. To do so, focus on three categories of criteria: the service catalog, operational details, and market characteristics. From there, I&O teams can determine the best technical and business fit from among the four groups of cloud-based email vendors.

taBlE OF COntEntS

Interest In Cloud-Based Email Is Growing Rapidly

Three Categories Of Criteria Help Differentiate The Providers

the Provider’s Service Catalog Determines Where It Can Help

the Provider’s Operational Details Determine How Well It Can Integrate

Market Characteristics Determine If the Provider Is a Fit For your Business

Cloud-Based Email Vendors Fall Into Four Groups

Competition Will Heat up as Everyone attacks the Platform Players’ Dominance

rECOMMEnDatIOnS

Take These Steps To Build The Right Cloud Email Plan

Supplemental Material

nOtES & rESOurCES

Forrester interviewed 15 vendors and spoke with hundreds of end user companies via inquiry and consulting engagements.

Related Research Documents

“learn From those Who Have Made the leap to Cloud-Based Email”

March 22, 2011

“Four Giants Compete For your Cloud Email Business”

august 13, 2010

“tier your Workforce to Save Money With Cloud-Based Corporate Email”

august 13, 2009

“Should your Email live In the Cloud? an Infrastructure and Operations analysis” January 5, 2009

Market Overview: Cloud-Based Email Vendors

a look at the Players and the Criteria you Should use to Differentiate them

by Christopher Voce

with robert Whiteley, ted Schadler, and lindsey Kempton

2 3

7

14 15

(3)

InTEREST In ClOuD-BaSED EMaIl IS GROwInG RaPIDly

Since we began our “Should Your Email Live In The Cloud?” series of documents, Forrester’s infrastructure and operations (I&O) clients have shown a tremendous interest in how cloud-based services affect email and collaboration service provisioning.1 It’s certainly not just an SMB trend

anymore either — organizations of all sizes show interest. One question that comes up often is “How real is this trend?” On the surface, the answer is simple: It’s real. AT&T, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Verizon, and VMware are making heavy investments in cloud email. That many major players just

don’t throw billions of dollars at a fad.

To understand why vendors are making these investments, it’s important to note that companies are increasing investments in collaboration tools (see Figure 1). Our research shows there can be significant strategic and cost benefits for enterprises that can make the leap.2 Of course, a move to a

cloud or hosted service is not for every organization out there, and the decision requires significant internal investigation.3 Organizations seeking help from the cloud are looking to:

·

Trim upfront and ongoing email costs. Email isn’t cheap, and it’s only getting worse for most companies as business and technical factors combine to drive costs higher and higher. Employees are demanding larger inboxes as sending larger files becomes more commonplace. Regulation and litigation drive investments in archiving and eDiscovery platforms. Increasing use of mobile devices to access email also drives investments to manage access. Cloud-based providers have practically untouchable economies of skill and scale that translate into attractive pricing for companies spending far more than they’d like on email today.

·

Free up resources for strategic initiatives and increase flexibility. Running your own email platform better than your competitor isn’t going to send quarterly profits sailing, but providing employees with the secure, scalable tools they need to better serve customers and win new ones can. Forrester’s book Empowered outlines how equipping “highly effective and resourceful operatives” (HEROes) with cloud services empowers these employees to solve customer challenges.4 In a recent Forrester survey, when asked what their motivation was for investing in

managed services for telecommunications, interviewees cited refocusing on the business rather than pure cost savings for the first time in years.5

·

Have quicker and easier access to new features and services. The complexity of upgrading your existing email platform can be daunting, disruptive, and expensive. Yet employees are looking for newer features and capabilities in the tools they use to get their job done. In a cloud email world, the majority of the upgrade burden shifts to the service provider, who must keep customers current on their email software.

(4)

Figure 1 Companies Continue to Prioritize Collaboration

Source: Forrester Research, Inc.

57741

“How important is improving collaboration and information exchange to your internal IT organization when making software decisions?”

Base: 1,900 decision-makers at North American and European enterprises and small businesses Not at all important

Slightly important Somewhat important Important Very important Don’t know 2% 11% 26% 36% 24% 1%

Source: Enterprise And SMB Software Survey, North America And Europe, Q4 2009

THREE CaTEGORIES OF CRITERIa HElP DIFFEREnTIaTE THE PROVIDERS

This market overview focuses on vendors that can host mailboxes along with other services,

although there are several providers that can help offload responsibility for email filtering, archiving, and disaster recovery.6 Previously, we looked at four core platforms — Cisco, Google, IBM, and

Microsoft — but they’re not the only vendors you should consider to deliver email and its associated services.7 There are several other larger third-party hosting companies and telecoms that offer

hosted platforms from IBM Lotus, Microsoft, and others that can be a better fit for your business. Why? Because the platform vendors themselves may be able to serve a broad base, but they can’t cater to every industry, geography, and company size.

With the myriad of players in the market, how do you determine which is best for your organization?8 Of course, cost is always going to be a top concern and should be part of your

evaluation. We have grouped the additional factors into three categories: service catalog, operational details, and market characteristics.

The Provider’s Service Catalog Determines where It Can Help

Determining the right vendor for you depends on the breadth of its offering — and if that offering meets your current and future needs. Many companies aren’t looking at moving just their email; they’re considering other collaboration applications and services, such as team workspaces, that are required to support them in their environments (see Figure 2). Because of the integration between email, business applications, supporting services, and other collaboration tools, there can be significant cost savings when they’re bundled together. Thus, from a service catalog perspective, the core criteria include:

(5)

·

Email platform. This is the staple of any service, but it’s not necessarily as clear-cut as it might seem. Price and mailbox size are usually the two biggest elements to focus on, but there’s more to consider. A provider may offer just one tier of service based on mailbox size, while others may offer multiple mailbox size options. Multiple price points allow you to tier your workforce so that you can tailor the offering for your company.9 In addition, whether or not the vendor provides

dedicated infrastructure or a multitenant service affects your performance and reliability.

·

Supporting services. These services include archiving and eDiscovery, filtering, and disaster

recovery. Your organization’s broader archiving and eDiscovery needs can heavily influence your email decisions. Email may be but one data type that is discoverable, so whatever the email solution is, it has to fit in with your broader compliance initiatives. Supporting services are often resold solutions from focused providers like Iron Mountain or LiveOffice.

·

Mobile options. BlackBerry support for executives used to be sufficient. But now mobile

options are exploding as iPhones, iPads, Windows Phone 7, and Android-based devices increase in popularity and the number of employees using them expands. BlackBerry support has been a pricey option to date, usually hovering around $10 per employee per month, but RIM has been working with providers to help drive down these costs.10 Picking a vendor that fits into your

short- and long-term mobile strategy requires doing a mobile needs assessment.11

·

Additional collaboration tools. You should consider team workspaces, instant messaging, and other collaboration tools along with email. Instant messaging and presence is becoming an increasingly important component of collaboration, as it helps set the right context for how two employees should communicate. Unified communications and Web conferencing integration may also be a high priority for you. If you’re working with a mix of on-premises and cloud-based tools, you’ll have to investigate whether or not there are compatibility issues. Bottom line: You need to weave together a cohesive collaboration strategy.12

(6)

Figure 2 Email Is nearly ubiquitous, But Other tools are Increasingly Common

Source: Forrester Research, Inc.

57741

“What percentage of your firm’s employees use each of the following collaboration tools for work purposes?”

Base: 483 decision-makers at North American and European enterprises Source: Enterprise And SMB Software Survey, North America And Europe, Q4 2009

Email Employee portal Audioconferencing Instant messaging Team workspaces Videoconferencing Web conferencing Social networks Wikis Blogs 83% 46% 33% 28% 22% 22% 20% 12% 11% 7%

The Provider’s Operational Details Determine How well It Can Integrate

In addition to the scope of the services a provider offers, there’s a set of criteria that exposes how well potential providers can fit into your operations. Forrester refers to these as the operational details of a provider. These considerations determine whether a vendor can meet technical and business requirements your company might have. Providers need to demonstrate that they can integrate with your existing applications and meet the bar for your security requirements. The operational characteristics to focus on include:

·

Data center locations. The location of a provider’s data centers can have both technical and regulatory implications for your company. It’s important to note that although a provider may have data centers in regions around the world, it might only be able to host the entire organization’s mailboxes from one location.

·

Integration methods. Your employees aren’t the only ones who use email; some of your CRM, finance, HR, and other applications also leverage your mail servers to send messages. Some of these applications might use proprietary integration methods like MAPI to talk to the mail servers. Providers vary on what protocols and methods they expose to customers. In addition, you’ll need to investigate how the provider integrates with your enterprise directories.

(7)

·

Security certifications. Security rises to the top as one of the, if not the, top concerns of companies looking to shift email responsibilities to their providers. Certifications like SAS 70 v2 certify a provider’s operations to a standard. SAS 70 v2 is being replaced by SSAE 16, so it’s important to ask candidates about their plans to meet this new certification.13 Also, vendors

vary on what other regulatory standards they meet, like the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

·

Service-level agreements. Most providers offer 99.9% uptime. Make sure you understand what

constitutes downtime and how much notice you’re given before service windows, which are typically excluded from the uptime SLA. But uptime is just a starting point. You’ll also need to find out what the recovery point and recovery time objectives are. To do so, focus on additional elements like support SLAs that define the window for a support response.14

·

Migration services. The effort required to perform the migration may exceed what your staff has the time or the experience to handle. Some vendors have their own professional services, and others rely on partners to assist. Either way, I&O teams will want to push prospective vendors for relevant experience with customers of their size and complexity.

Market Characteristics Determine If The Provider Is a Fit For your Business

The last category of criteria is market characteristics, which point to the kinds of customers a vendor is tooled to serve effectively. Not many companies are comfortable being the first to adopt a solution, nor are they happy to be a provider’s largest or smallest customer. Some of the elements to focus on include:

·

Company history. Newer entrants have a learning curve. When Google first entered the corporate email market, customers initially wondered whether Google would understand how to support an enterprise customer. In addition to history, it’s important to focus on where the provider will continue to take their offering.

·

Customer footprint. Most vendors will claim a global customer base but might not have local data centers. The result? Employees’ email experiences may vary. Slowdowns when sending large attachments and sharing free/busy calendaring are two of the more common issues. Don’t be shy about asking how they plan on scaling to meet their growing customer base either.

·

Target market. Vendors are often optimized to meet just one organization size or industry.

Focusing on a vendor’s target market, you’ll want to answer questions like: “Is my business too small to get the attention my environment requires?”; “Is my company so large that I’ll test the limits of what the vendor can manage and offer support for?”; or “Do they understand my industry?”

(8)

ClOuD-BaSED EMaIl VEnDORS Fall InTO FOuR GROuPS

There’s no shortage of vendors that provide cloud email, and these providers come from very different backgrounds (see Figure 3). Forrester sees them falling into four high-level groups:

·

Incumbent platform vendors: Microsoft, IBM/Lotus, and VMware/Zimbra. Microsoft and IBM have long histories of offering their products as on-premises solutions and continue to offer both. Microsoft owns the majority of the market today. Microsoft’s Exchange Online is often paired with some components in its Business Productivity Online Suite (BPOS), and the soon-to-be-released Office 365.15 It offers Exchange Online in two different fashions: standard — a multitenant offering

for companies of all sizes, and dedicated — a single-tenant offering for customers with more than 5,000 seats and requirements that prevent them from using the multitenant offering.

IBM initially offered a dedicated infrastructure solution with LotusLive Notes in 2008 and followed with a multitenant version in August 2010. IBM released LotusLive iNotes in early 2010, which is based on the platform it received from the Outblaze acquisition. VMware entered the fray when it acquired Zimbra from Yahoo and offers Zimbra via its partners.

·

Newer cloud pure plays: Google and Cisco. These vendors don’t offer products that can be deployed on-premises today. In a relatively short time, Google grew its successful ad-supported consumer email platform into an ad-free enterprise product. Doubts that Google is serious about the enterprise are fading as the company continues to win new customers and enhance its offering. Google sets itself apart by also including its hosted office authoring tools in its package. Cisco briefly entered the market in 2009 with its 2008 PostPath acquisition but recently ceased development to focus on the remaining pieces of its collaboration portfolio.16

·

Collaboration service providers: Apptix, Intermedia, and USA.NET. Why not go directly to Microsoft and other platform providers? They just might not be a good fit for your company. As mentioned, Microsoft offers two flavors of Exchange Online: standard and dedicated. The

dedicated version is only offered to companies with more than 5,000 seats, but technical integration or regulatory requirements might dictate greater segmentation or control than Microsoft can offer smaller companies looking to deploy Exchange. That’s where collaboration service providers step in. They are experts at running and tailoring Exchange and other email and collaboration services for customers. Other significant vendors in this category targeting companies of all sizes include CenterBeam, which provides sophisticated integration with Active Directory, and Ceryx.

(9)

·

Diversified hosting and telecoms: several providers. These include AT&T, Connectria, NaviSite, Rackspace, Verio, and Verizon. These larger telecommunications and hosting companies carry benefits and considerations similar to the collaboration service providers, but they offer a wider variety of services and often have a broader data center footprint for global customers. As mentioned, VMware has also positioned Zimbra to be an appliance offered by its vCloud partners.

Many companies often overlook the collaboration service providers and diversified hosting and telecoms that can offer the flexibility and control they might need. Most provide Microsoft Exchange as their core offering, and others offer IBM Lotus Notes and Domino as well.

(10)

Figure 3 Comparing today’s Cloud Email Providers

Source: Forrester Research, Inc.

57741

Apptix AT&T

Email platform(s)

supported Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Exchange Mailbox size limit 5 Gb

Both

5Gb Dedicated or multitenant

deployment

Archiving services (email and other services) DR and continuity services Filtering (antispam, antivirus)

Team site/workspace Instant messaging Mobile device support Data center locations (number, if disclosed) Integrates with your affiliated applications SAS 70 Type II compliant? Uptime SLA

Migration services

Market characteristics

Years in email-hosting business

Target market (enterprise: 5,000+; midmarket: 1,000-5,000; SMB: <1,000) Regional focus Largest corporate customer (by number of mailboxes) Dedicated Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Microsoft SharePoint Microsoft SharePoint Microsoft Office

Communication Server Communication ServerMicrosoft Office BlackBerry, ActiveSync,

Palm BlackBerry, ActiveSync,Palm US (5) Global (38) Yes Yes 12 13 Yes Yes Yes Yes 100% 99.9% standard, customizable SMB, midmarket, enterprise Enterprise US, EMEA Global 100,000+ Cannot disclose, more

than 20,000

Service catalog

Operational details

,

Connectria

IBM Lotus Notes, Microsoft Exchange,

VMware/Zimbra Vendor does not disclose

Both Yes Yes Yes

Microsoft SharePoint, IBM LotusLive Connections Microsoft OCS and IBM

Lotus Sametime BlackBerry, ActiveSync US (3) 14 Yes Yes

Yes, through partners Varies per customer

requirements

SMB, midmarket, enterprise

Global 12,000

(11)

Figure 3 Comparing today’s Cloud Email Providers (Cont.)

Source: Forrester Research, Inc.

57741

Google

Google Apps for Business 25 Gb

Multitenant Yes Yes Yes Google Apps for Business — Google Sites

Google Apps for Business — Google On-premises BlackBerry support through a connector; ActiveSync devices, Android Global (”dozens”) 6 Yes, via Gears

Yes

Yes, through partners 99.9% SMB, midmarket, enterprise Global 30,000 Email platform(s) supported Mailbox size limit Dedicated or multitenant deployment

Archiving services (email and other services) DR and continuity services Filtering (antispam, antivirus)

Team site/workspace Instant messaging Mobile device support

Data center locations (number, if disclosed) Integrates with your affiliated applications SAS 70 Type II compliant? Uptime SLA

Migration services

Market characteristics

Years in email-hosting business

Target market (enterprise: 5,000+; midmarket: 1,000-5,000; SMB: <1,000) Regional focus Largest corporate customer (by number of mailboxes) Service catalog Operational details IBM/Lotus LotusLive Notes, LotusLive iNotes 25 Gb Both Yes Yes Yes LotusLive Connections Lotus Sametime Blackberry, ActiveSync Global (40) Yes Yes 10 Yes 99.9% SMB, midmarket, enterprise Global Does not disclose, more

than 100,000 Intermedia Microsoft Exchange 25 Gb Both Yes Yes Yes Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services (WSS) Microsoft Office Communication Server BlackBerry, ActiveSync, Palm US (4) UK (1) 15 Yes Yes Yes 99.999% SMB Global 2,800

(12)

Figure 3 Comparing today’s Cloud Email Providers (Cont.)

Source: Forrester Research, Inc.

57741

Email platform(s) supported Mailbox size limit Dedicated or multitenant deployment

Archiving services (email and other services) DR and continuity services Filtering (antispam, antivirus)

Team site/workspace Instant messaging Mobile device support Data center locations (number, if disclosed) Integrates with your affiliated applications SAS 70 Type II compliant? Uptime SLA

Migration services

Market characteristics

Years in email-hosting business

Target market (enterprise: 5,000+; midmarket: 1,000-5,000; SMB: <1,000) Regional focus Largest corporate customer (by number of mailboxes) Service catalog Operational details Microsoft Microsoft Exchange 25 Gb Both Yes Yes Yes Microsoft SharePoint Microsoft Lync BlackBerry, ActiveSync Global Yes Yes 4

Yes, via Microsoft and partners 99.9% SMB, midmarket, enterprise Global 100,000 + Navisite

IBM Lotus Notes, Microsoft Exchange 4 Gb Both Yes Yes Yes

Microsoft SharePoint, IBM Lotus Quickr Microsoft OCS and IBM

Lotus Sametime BlackBerry, ActiveSync, Palm, LotusConnect Global (16) 17 Yes Yes Yes Varies per customer

requirements Midmarket, enterprise Global 10,000 Rackspace Microsoft Exchange, Rackspace Email 2 Gb and 10 Gb Both Yes Yes Yes Microsoft SharePoint None BlackBerry, ActiveSync, iPhone US (3) Yes Yes Yes 100% 11 SMB US and Europe 20,000

(13)

Figure 3 Comparing today’s Cloud Email Providers (Cont.)

Source: Forrester Research, Inc.

57741

USA.NET Verio

Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Exchange, VMware/Zimbra Vendor does not disclose 2 Gb

Both Both Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Microsoft SharePoint None

Microsoft OCS None BlackBerry, ActiveSync BlackBerry, ActiveSync

US, APAC (5) North America, Europe, Asia Pacific Yes Yes 13 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes 99.9% 100% SMB, midmarket, enterprise SMB Global Global

300,000+ Vendor does not disclose Email platform(s)

supported Mailbox size limit Dedicated or multitenant deployment

Archiving services (email and other services) DR and continuity services Filtering (antispam, antivirus)

Team site/wsorkspace Instant messaging Mobile device support Data center locations (number, if disclosed) Integrates with your affiliated applications SAS 70 Type II compliant? Uptime SLA

Migration services

Market characteristics

Years in email-hosting business

Target market (enterprise: 5,000+; midmarket: 1,000-5,000; SMB: <1,000) Regional focus Largest corporate customer (by number of mailboxes)

Service catalog

(14)

Figure 3 Comparing today’s Cloud Email Providers (Cont.)

Source: Forrester Research, Inc.

57741

Verizon VMware/Zimbra

Microsoft Exchange, Google Apps

(reseller for SMBs/midmarket) vSphere hosting partnersZimbra hosted and via 25Gb Varies by partner Both Both Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Microsoft SharePoint Zimbra

Microsoft OCS Zimbra

BlackBerry, ActiveSync (varies by partner)

BlackBerry, ActiveSync

Operates in 200 global data centers Partners available globally Yes

Yes

10 6

Yes, offers Zimlets Yes

Yes Yes, and via partners Vary per provider 99.9% standard, customizable

Midmarket, enterprise SMB, midmarket Global Global 30,000 100,000 + Email platform(s)

supported Mailbox size limit Dedicated or multitenant deployment

Archiving services (email and other services) DR and continuity services Filtering (antispam, antivirus)

Team site/workspace Instant messaging Mobile device support Data center locations (number, if disclosed) Integrates with your affiliated applications SAS 70 Type II compliant? Uptime SLA

Migration services

Market characteristics

Years in email-hosting business

Target market (enterprise: 5,000+; midmarket: 1,000-5,000; SMB: <1,000) Regional focus Largest corporate customer (by number of mailboxes)

Service catalog

(15)

Competition will Heat up as Everyone attacks The Platform Players’ Dominance

Out of these players, who’s going to win? As we’ve previously said, it’s still early in the game.17

Microsoft’s Exchange platform is a formidable force, whether it’s delivered on-premises by Microsoft or by one of its partners. Google has made some high-profile wins and always seems to be in the conversation. IBM will fight hard at keeping its existing customers and going after new business. The other third-party telecoms, hosting companies, and providers will continually have to go

after these platform vendors and expand their existing customer relationships with value-added email and collaboration. Their biggest threat comes from the platform vendors themselves as they continue to enhance their own hosted variants. Cisco faced an uphill battle against the other established players, and its vision for its future collaboration and communication solutions no longer includes homegrown email. It will build off its success with IP telephony, telepresence, and WebEx and attempt to extend into newer areas where it feels it can differentiate, and it will integrate with other mail platforms.

r E C O M M E n D a t I O n S

TakE THESE STEPS TO BuIlD THE RIGHT ClOuD EMaIl Plan

there are many factors that point to the skyrocketing interest and deployment of cloud-based email — not the least of which was a down economy that forced the need for thrifty thinking. Whatever the reasons, this is a complex system that has many moving parts. Cloud-based email is real but by no means a simple decision. to wade your way through, Forrester recommends that you:

·

assess your workforce needs, app and business integration requirements, and costs.

We’ve discussed the evaluation process in earlier research, and it’s important to note that you can glean valuable information from the process, even if your company isn’t looking

to push email to the cloud right now.18 the exercise will illuminate what aspects about the

cloud aren’t ready today so that you can make the move when vendors have cleared the hurdles currently in your way. you’ll also learn how to optimize email provisioning for the organization, such as tiering your employees. this ensures they get exactly what they need without overprovisioning software and storage.

·

look within your existing relationships for help. your existing relationships with vendors

are often the best place to start. Do you have a broader relationship with a hosting company? It might be able to cut you a better deal based on your overall relationship, and you won’t have to expand your provider portfolio and manage yet another vendor relationship.

·

Time a move with an upgrade. If you’ve recently upgraded your email platform, there’s little

(16)

·

Explore a split-domain hybrid option, combining on-premises and cloud-based email. the

cloud might offer you the opportunity to provision email to people who don’t currently have mailboxes. two good examples include: 1) insurance companies extending accounts to agents who depended on their own accounts previously, and 2) manufacturing companies looking to cut costs and improve communication with employees without corporate email for things like Hr communications and work scheduling. Microsoft offers the Deskless Worker plan, and companies like uSa.nEt and rackspace offer cheaper mail platforms that they can combine with their Exchange offering to help customers tier service to their users — offering cheap mailboxes that meet the more modest needs of part of their company. IBM also offers the ability to extend their on-premises environment into the cloud as part of their current offering.

·

Consider carving out supporting services instead. the cloud isn’t ready for everyone’s

mailboxes. Integration requirements as well as security or regulatory issues can make you shy away from throwing it all over the wall now — but that doesn’t mean you can’t take advantage of cloud-based providers like liveOffice, Mimecast, Iron Mountain, Dell MessageOne, and Symantec that offer filtering, archiving, and eDiscovery. Even productized disaster recovery offerings can be attractive alternatives to doing it yourself. Companies like azaleos can also offload management and support of your Exchange environment, giving you some of the benefits of the cloud. It also works with companies like Verizon to deliver this same service in a hosted environment.

·

Expand the membership of the evaluation team. the implications of transitioning to

the cloud reach farther than infrastructure and operations. your content and collaboration colleagues will integrate the cloud service into their information workplace plans, help with employee change management, and assist choosing the right vendor based on the service catalog. Sourcing professionals can weigh in on how to construct a best-fit relationship for your company with the provider and how this affects your broader licensing relationship with companies like Microsoft and IBM. application owners that integrate with your email platform will have to examine the required change management or implications of a shift. Even finance might need to be involved if your organization has been traditionally geared toward capital expenditure (capex) rather than operating expenditure (opex). Forrester’s book Empowered also outlines how to build a HErO compact between business, It, and your empowered employees. Consider tapping this cross-functional team to vet cloud email for

customer-facing business functions.19

SuPPlEMEnTal MaTERIal

Companies Interviewed For This Document

Apptix AT&T BT Cisco Connectria Google

(17)

IBM/Lotus Intermedia LiveOffice Microsoft NaviSite USA.NET Verio Verizon VMware/Zimbra EnDnOTES

1 Interest in cloud-based email is rapidly rising. The promise of reducing operational costs and refocusing on their core competencies has many Forrester customers asking about the cloud. Cloud-based services like those of Google and Microsoft are more than just an SMB solution — large organizations like GlaxoSmithKline are moving essential services to the cloud. In the past year, Forrester has fielded more than 100 inquiries about the impact of the cloud on email and collaboration. See the July 31, 2009, “Inquiry Spotlight: Cloud-Based Email, Q3 2009” report.

2 While firms with fewer than 15,000 employees can almost always save money by moving all mailboxes to the cloud, every firm can save money by moving their occasional users — workers that can get away with a web-based email client — to a cloud-based email provider. How much money? For these occasional users, as much as $63 per user per year. See the August 13, 2009, “Tier Your Workforce To Save Money With Cloud-Based Corporate Email” report.

3 The process of choosing the right architecture for your organization starts with a discovery project to better understand the opportunities, risks, and implications of making a change. There is a large ecosystem of partners that can help. But before you start, you have to roll up your sleeves to do a detailed risk and impact analysis lest you come across a surprise that blows up your migration effort. See the January 5, 2009, “Should Your Email Live In The Cloud? An Infrastructure And Operations Analysis” report.

4 Source: Josh Bernoff and Ted Schadler, Empowered: Unleash Your Employees, Energize Your Customers,

Transform Your Business, Harvard Business Review Press, 2010 (http://www.forrester.com/empowered).

5 Unlike in past years, the top reason isn’t cost savings — although it is still high on the list. Instead, firms are opting for managed services to enable them to focus on their core business competencies — not just keeping the network running. See the August 7, 2009, “The State Of Enterprise Networks And Telecommunications: 2009” report.

6 Supporting services can take up more space, power, and resources than they need to. Traditional on-premises software vendors like Trend Micro are taking their solutions and offering them as a service. While circumstances such as a broader corporate strategy involving an archiving service might limit options, there is a clear opportunity for many to offload the cost and responsibility associated with filtering, archiving, and disaster recover. See the January 5, 2009, “Should Your Email Live In The Cloud? A Comparative Cost Analysis” report.

(18)

8 Infrastructure and operations chiefs at companies large and small are beginning to entrust their email to Google, IBM, Microsoft, and other hosters. Migrating this important resource to the cloud is a big step, and it’s not always an easy journey. With a few years of migration experience now under the market’s belt, best practices and pitfalls begin to show themselves. To ease the pain of your migration, follow best practices such as cleaning up your Active Directory environment prior to the migration and assembling a diverse pilot group. See the March 22, 2011, “Learn From Those Who Have Made The Leap To Cloud-Based Email” report.

9 Forrester has begun surveying information workers to help firms benchmark their own employees’

technology adoption and satisfaction. This work has led us to make three suggestions on how best to tier your workforce. See the August 13, 2009, “Tier Your Workforce To Save Money With Cloud-Based Corporate Email” report.

10 Until it exited the market, Cisco offered BlackBerry support for $1 per month, per employee.

11 Progressive firms are conducting workforce technology needs assessments as the first step — among other technology initiatives — in defining their next-generation mobile computing strategy. This fact-based segmentation initiative helps firms understand which workforce technologies map to which user segments. See the October 28, 2010, “The Mobile Operating System Wars Escalate” report.

12 To get work done, distributed and B2B teams need real-time collaboration tools that replicate the power and experience of face-to-face meetings and support “pervasive” interactions. Fortunately, real-time tools are getting better. Presence shows team members’ context; instant messaging (IM) moves the dialog to mobile devices; Web conferencing allows video and document sharing; and telepresence delivers face-time quality. For an IT shop weary of installing yet another software application, it’s important to see that real-time collaboration can — and sometimes should — be delivered with a cloud-based service. See the September 4, 2008, “Distributed Teams Need Real-Time Collaboration Tools” report.

13 More detail can be found on the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants website: http://www. aicpa.org/InterestAreas/AccountingAndAuditing/Resources/SOC/Pages/Users.aspx.

14 Firms should find out where their SaaS solution is hosted, where and how it is backed up. They should ask their provider about recovery time objective (RTO) — the time to get data back after a failure — and recovery point objective (RPO) — time between backups, which translates into risk of data loss. Firms should also find out if there are partners that can offer additional backup and recovery options if they are not satisfied with what their provider offers. See the February 22, 2010, “SaaS Valuation Criteria” report. 15 As part of an upcoming upgrade to its online offering, Microsoft is also rebranding its Business Productivity

Online Suite (BPOS) as Office 365. Office 365 is currently in beta at the publishing of this report. The Office 365 suite includes updated cloud-based versions of Microsoft Exchange, SharePoint, and Office Communications Server (recently renamed “Lync”). It will add Office web apps as well as a subscription to Office Pro Plus for certain plans.

16 Prior to the publishing of this report, Cisco announced it is exiting the cloud-based email market to focus on its broader communication and collaboration portfolio. Email was just one prong of Cisco’s collaboration platform strategy, which includes WebEx conferencing, instant messaging, telepresence, social

(19)

software, and video streaming. Forrester believes Cisco will look to integrate with and wrap its solutions around its former competitors’ email platforms. Infrastructure and operations professionals must work with their content and collaboration colleagues to determine if their solutions meet the needs of the workforce and how they’ll integrate with corporate email and other applications. Source: Christopher Voce, “Cisco Sends A Recall On Its Cloud Email Strategy,” Christopher Voce’s Blog, February 23, 2011 (http://blogs. forrester.com/christopher_voce/11-02-23-cisco_sends_a_recall_on_its_cloud_email_strategy).

17 Already there is a battle raging to win your business. You will win as vendors compete on price, features, innovation, bundles, and service. But for vendors, it will be a tough five years as companies pick a messaging and collaboration partner for the next decade. It’s a little early to make the call on the endgame for the cloud email and collaboration market, but we will make a few predictions even at this early stage. See the August 13, 2010, “Four Giants Compete For Your Cloud Email Business” report.

18 After performing an impact analysis, you may run into organizational resistance to moving off-premises. Google, IBM, Microsoft, and other vendors are rapidly improving their services to make them more digestible, but maybe your organization faces too many hurdles to make a shift within the next two years. See the January 5, 2009, “Should Your Email Live In The Cloud? A Comparative Cost Analysis” report. 19 Source: Josh Bernoff and Ted Schadler, Empowered: Unleash Your Employees, Energize Your Customers,

(20)

Forrester Research, Inc. (Nasdaq: FORR) is an independent research company that provides pragmatic and forward-thinking advice to global leaders in business and technology. Forrester works with professionals in 19 key roles at major companies providing

proprietary research, customer insight, consulting, events, and peer-to-peer executive programs. For more than 27 years, Forrester has been making IT, marketing, and technology industry leaders successful every day. For more information, visit www.forrester.com.

400 Technology Square Cambridge, MA 02139 USA Tel: +1 617.613.6000 Fax: +1 617.613.5000

Email: [email protected] Nasdaq symbol: FORR

www.forrester.com

For information on hard-copy or electronic reprints, please contact Client Support at +1 866.367.7378, +1 617.613.5730, or [email protected].

We offer quantity discounts and special pricing for academic and nonprofit institutions. For a complete list of worldwide locations visit www.forrester.com/about.

internationally, including Amsterdam; Cambridge, Mass.; Dallas; Dubai; Foster City, Calif.; Frankfurt; London; Madrid; Sydney; Tel Aviv; and Toronto.

References

Related documents

izbrojim njene krugove, svaka tadka mogla je biti ona podetna, svaki znak pridodat mno5tvu drugih znako- va mogao je biti onaj moj, ali ni5ta ne bi vredelo i da sam

NALCO BT-25 dosage will vary depending on the feedwater calcium hardness and the desired boiler water phosphate residual.. Calcium Factor = 16 ppm NALCO BT-25 per ppm feedwater

Stage 2 Child Care, which is available to families on welfare and with stable employment. Families may be eligible for Stage 2 Child Care for up to 24 months after they stop receiving

The research study was directed at determining an integrated Chicken manure and inorganic fertilizer formulation that ensures: efficient Nitrogen uptake by the maize plant for

In particular, we investigate the usability of the available on-device inertial sensors to make the tracking and mapping process more resilient to rapid motions and to estimate

Long-term: App user monetization will lead to significantly higher margins and growth rates, likely increasing the valuation levels of myTaste to be more in line with other

In adult mental health care, the move to greater integration was furthered by legal frameworks under the Health Act 1999 (Section 31) and the National Health Service Act 2006

Seven outcomes were used in this systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of social norms interventions that were reported by the included studies: (1) alcohol-related