• No results found

Massive MIMO performance with imperfect channel reciprocity and channel estimation error

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Massive MIMO performance with imperfect channel reciprocity and channel estimation error"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1. A massive MU-MIMO TDD System.
Fig. 2.Output SINR with MRT precoding in the presence of fixed phaseerrors and different combinations of amplitude errors.
Fig. 3. Output SINR with ZF precoding in the presence of fixed phase errorsand different combinations of amplitude errors.
Fig. 8. Output SINR versus SNR in the presence of different levels of thechannel reciprocity error and channel estimation error (τ 2 = 0.1).
+2

References

Related documents

SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract between the City of Oakley and the Office of the Sheriff, Contra Costa County for Dispatch and 911

Complete the following Mindtap assignments by clicking on the Mindtap menu in Blackboard and then selecting the weekly folder. See the schedule above for individual

Figure 3.2 also shows the effect of the heat transfer between the exhaust gases from the internal combustion engine to the ATTAS where water is tested to

Postpartum depression is associated with A past history of psychiatric illness, illiteracy, low socioeconomic status , lack of good antenatal care, nuclear

SenTube A Corpus for Sentiment Analysis on YouTube Social Media Olga Uryupina1, Barbara Plank2, Aliaksei Severyn1, Agata Rotondi1, Alessandro Moschitti1,3 1Department of

The results for both Bundesliga football and NBA basketball are split by season period to explore different situations where match importance may affect the overall correct

Ş anl ı urfa Chamber of Commerce and Industry Çaycuma Chamber of Commerce and Industry Fethiye Chamber of Commerce and Industry Kayseri Chamber of Commerce and Industry

On the other hand, opener animals of the VPA and VPA+RSV groups showed a reduced percentage of time spent in the door zone compared to non-openers of the same group (p=0.029