• No results found

Service Leadership Predominant Business Models The Service Leadership Index

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Service Leadership Predominant Business Models The Service Leadership Index"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Enabling

Accurate, Useful, Real Benchmark Comparisons

The Service Leadership Index

Service Leadership

Predominant Business Models

©

(2)

Why S-L Predominant Business Models © ?

Billable utilization is the key to Solution Provider profitability.

Different services have different utilization characteristics which result in different business cultures and best practices — different S-L Predominant

Business Models © (PBMs).

Once you have identified the S-L Predominant Business Model © , you

can compare results and identify applicable best practices.

Predominant Business Models enable apples-to- apples benchmarks on actionable business drivers that allow

accurate measurement of how well

management techniques and best practices

are working.

(3)

(Varies, often not material.)

(Similar to MS but adds capital expense challenges.)

(Mixture of the above.)

(Mixture of the below.)

(Also adds capital expense challenges.)

Distinct Utilization Patterns

Technical Svcs Project Services Managed Svcs Shared Svcs Infra-Balanced

Product-Centric

Utilization Pattern S-L Predominant

Business Model

©

IntrastructureServicesApplications Services

Apps-Balanced

Technical Svcs

Project Services

Managed Svcs

(4)

10 S-L Predominant Business Models ©

-

-

Product-Centric S-L Predominant

Business Model

©

Business Culture

IntrastructureServicesApplications Services

Attaining product volume commitments paramount. Services margin sometimes sacrificed to win/keep product deals.

Ad hoc times & material services, staff augmentation, block time, and other billable hour services where efficiency is not directly rewarded.

The engagement is defined by a scope of work with a clear beginning and ending, and the SP is committed to a successful implementation.

Services which are strictly billed on a scalable (unit based) flat fee and governed by a service level agreement. Efficiency yields higher GM%$

Managed Services in which the SP makes a capital investment in equipment which is then fractionally leased to customers: data center, hosting, etc.

This business model applies when the SP does most or all of the above and none are materially bigger than the other.

This business model applies when the SP does most or all of the below and none are materially bigger than the other.

Ad hoc times & material services, staff augmentation, training, documentation, and other billable services; efficiency not directly rewarded.

The engagement is defined by a scope of work with a beginning and ending, and the SP is committed to a successful construction or implementation.

Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) in which the SP owns the Software.

Technical Svcs Project Services Managed Svcs Shared Svcs Infra-Balanced

Apps-Balanced

Technical Svcs

Project Services

Managed Svcs

(5)

-

Identifying the S-L Predominant Business Model ©

No, product is at least 60% of total

revenue. Technical Svcs

Project Services Managed Svcs Shared Svcs Infra-Balanced

Apps-Balanced Technical Svcs Project Services Managed Svcs Product-Centric

Are Services

>= 40% of Total

Revenue?

What is the Solution Provider’s Total

Revenue?

Infrastructure

Which of these is at least 10%

bigger than

the others?

If none are 10% bigger, Balanced

Which of these is at least 10%

bigger than

the others?

Applications Is Infrastructure or Applications Larger?

(c) Service Leadership, Inc.

(6)

Your Starting Point Determines Your Path to Desired PDM

For example:

Most Infrastructure-centric Solution Providers are pursuing a path to Managed Services.

Their starting business model

determines the path they take, and the best practices they require.

Even two Solution Providers starting with the same S-L Predominant

Business Model

©

, will take differing amounts of time and have different levels of success.

Infrastructure Services

Your Path to Next S-L Predominant Business Model ©

S-L Predominant Business Model

©

Intrastructure Services

Managed Svcs Technical Svcs Project

Services

Product-Centric

Technical Svcs Project

Services

(7)

S-L Predominant Business Models

©

enable a Normalized SP Chart of Accounts

©

Enabling True SP Comparison

S-L Predominant Business Models

©

Targeted Best Practices

Normalized SP Chart of Accounts

©

Optimized Management

Efforts

They enable optimum management &

effective targeting

of best practices

(8)

Typical SP Chart of Accounts (CoA)

Unable to perform useful Analysis, much less comparison.

Poor SP CoA

Product Revenue Service Revenue Total Revenue Product COGS Gross Profit

Payroll (Services, Sales, Admin) Other Expenses

Total Expenses

Profit

(9)

(c) Service Leadership, Inc.

Poor SP CoA

Product Revenue Service Revenue Total Revenue Product COGS Gross Profit

Payroll (Services, Sales, Admin) Other Expenses

Total Expenses Profit

Normalized SP CoA

Product Revenue Service A Revenue Service B Revenue Total Revenue Product COGS

Service A COGS (Payroll) Service B COGS (Payroll) Total COGS

Product GM Service A GM Service B GM Total GM

Sales and Marketing Expense Other Expenses

Total Expenses

Profit

(10)

Enabling True SP Comparison

They enable optimum management &

effective targeting of best practices

S-L Predominant Business Models

©

Intelligent Best Practices

©

Normalized SP Chart of Accounts

©

Optimized Management

Efforts S-L Predominant Business Models

©

enable

a Normalized SP Chart of Accounts

©

(11)

Beneficial Improvement Loop

Together these enable optimum

management &

effective targeting of best practices

Know Your Predominant Business Model

©

Select More Applicable Best

Practices

Use the Normalized SP Chart of Accounts

©

Optimize Your Management

Efforts Knowing your Predominant Business Model

©

and (optionally) using the Normalized SP Chart of Accounts

©

enables you to better apply benchmarks and best practices, and then monitor your results.

Get More Accurate Benchmarks

Which enables more improvement,

faster.

Which allows measuring

how well management

techniques and best practices are

working.

They enable apples-to-

apples benchmarks on actionable

business drivers.

(12)

Benchmarking for Every Management Style

Corelytics

©

Lite

S-L Index™

Quarterly Comprehensive

Report

©

LOBs

Analyzed Cycle Fee

One Five All Eight Eight All

Monthly Monthly

On Demand Quarterly

Via Your Sponsor

$49/

mo.

$399

$2750 /yr

Corelytics

©

Standard

S-L Index™

Comprehensive Diagnostic

Report

©

S-L Index™

Yes*

Yes*

Yes*

Yes*

*Predominant Business Model©

calculated and S-L Index™

benchmarks included.

(13)

www.findmypbm.com

Determine Your Predominant Business Model © Now !

And learn how your PBM © effects how you use benchmarks and

implement best practices.

References

Related documents

In the longer term, you may need to continue self- catheterisation for several months; your Specialist Nurse or Consultant will give you more details of this at your

Additional inf or mation, including rights and per mission policies ,is av ailab le at http://jour nals .inf or ms .org/.... We consider the optimal consumption and investment

Pritchett and Summers (1996) argue that focusing on economic growth in developing countries will lead directly to reductions in infant mortality rates and improvements in

1) The estimated staff costs of each visit types in each centre was associated with the utilisation data from the micro-costing study i.e. generating a hypothetical staff

This study is intended to evaluate current power system protection coordination at Gas Processing Plant B (GPPB), Power system protection is a protection system

Vehovar (1999) observes that substitution for PSU-level nonre- sponse maintains the sample design structure allowing sampling variance estimation using the original stratification

2) Reputational: In certain industries, gaining a reputation for not stumping up a ‘fair’ share of local or national taxes could have an impact on brands. While measuring these

35 En adelante referencias en “Carta de Carlos Lamarca al Ministro de Relaciones Exteriores de la Confederación, Valparaiso 23/8/1858”, Archivo Histórico de la