Expression of recombinant
peptides in
E.coli
Richard Williamson
Department of Biosciences
Introduction – different expression strategies available
Insoluble fusions with KSI
Why recombinant expression?
Cost Synthesis expensive for large amounts of peptide >30 residues
Fidelity Post-synthesis purification increasingly difficult for peptides over 30 residues
Isotopic Labelling
Enables more sophisticated experiments. 15N and/or 13C often
needed to make unambiguous assignments in unstructured peptides.
1. Direct Expression
(individual and tandem constructs)
Eg: Human proinsulin (Shen 1984, PNAS, 81, p4627)
•
Poor stability•
Stability much better with tandem repeats (3 or more) where product formed insoluble inclusion bodies•
Low expression.•
Soluble peptides would be difficult to purify.Strategies used for the recombinant expression of peptides
in
E.coli.
2. Soluble Fusion Partner
•
Fusion partner highly expressed•
Improved peptide stability and solubility•
Fusion partner can provide a method of affinity purification.•
Yield dependent on MW of fusion partner:Highest expression for GB1 (15-50mg/l purified peptide). Low yields for GST or MBP (<2mg/l peptide)
•
Peptide cleavage usually enzymatic (factor Xa and SUMO protease give authentic N-terminus)•
GB1 has been used as an attached “solubility enhancement tag” for proteins and peptides. Zhou et al 2001, J Biomol NMR 20, p11Maltose binding protein (MBP) 42kD NEB
Glutathione S-transferase (GST) 27kD Amersham
Thioredoxin (Trx) 12kD Novagen
Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) 11kD Invitrogen
B1 domain of protein G (GB1) 6kD Koenig et al 2003, J
Biomol NMR, 26 p193
3. Insoluble Fusion Partners
(Inclusion bodies)
•
Further improvement in stability and expression yields•
Production of toxic peptides•
Simple protein isolation•
Addition of His-tag for affinity purification in denaturing conditions.•
Peptide cleavage usually chemical (CNBr, dilute acid for Asp-Pro)•
Only KSI vector commercially available•
Expression yields typically >100mg/l of fusion protein. Peptides yields of 5-58 mg/l reported.Ketosteroid Isomerase (KSI) 14kD Novagen
Oligonucleotide binding domain (SFC120) 14kD Osbourne et al 2003 Anthanilate synthase 36kD Jones et al 2000 RNA binding domain of hnRNCP1 13kD Sharon et al 2002
Expression of Integrin binding peptides
RGD-containing peptides originally derived from the foot and mouth disease virus capsid coat protein and the latency associated peptide of TGFβ1 and 3
1
10
A20fmvdv2
NAVPNL
RGD
L
QV
L
AQKVART
A20lap2
GFTTGR
RGD
L
AT
I
HGLNRPF
TGFβ3
NEDDHQ
RGD
L
GR
L
KKQKDHH
DBD-1
EK
C
PNL
RGD
L
QV
L
AQKV
C
RT
DBD-2C
YVPNL
RGD
L
QV
L
AQKVAK
C
Binding motifRGD
L
xx
L
•
Insoluble KSI fusion system chosen for recombinant production.Expression Strategy (pET31b)
T7lac KSI His6 AlwNI pET31b KSI His6 ATG TAC M TAC ATG M AlwN1 cleavage Annealed synthetic
oligos Ligation TAC
ATG
TAC ATGTAC ATG
KSI ATG M His6 TAC M TAC ATG TAC ATG TAC ATG KSI His6 ATG TAC M M TAC ATG Ligation of cut vector with oligos to give single or tandem inserts.
(
)
n Tandem repeats M M P P P PProtein expression M M M M H6 KSI Insoluble inclusion bodies
Inclusion body isolation and protein purification. Cyanogen bromide (CNBr) cleavage.
KSI
+
Pep Pep Pep
Pep
3x
+
H6Lyophilisation and peptide extraction from insoluble KSI using aqueous buffer.
Reverse-phase HPLC.
Pep
Cleavage at Met residues
Pure peptide with homoserine (HS)
modification at C-terminus
HS
HS HS
Chemical Cleavage Site
The specificity of the AlwNI restriction enzyme allows the vector to be engineered with different residues for chemical cleavage.
…CAG
NNN
CTG…
…GTC
NNN
GAC…
AlwNI
Methionine (ATG) widely used as cleavage with CNBr is highly efficient. Cysteine or tryptophan are alternatives if the peptide contains Met.
Tandem Repeat Insertions
•
Tandem inserts for small peptides (<25 residues) increase yield.•
Optimal number of inserts = 2-4 (Hartmann et al 2008, J. Biotech 135, p85; Sharpe et al 2005 Prot Expr. Purif. 42, p200)•
Annealed oligos can be ligatedtogether and the desired concatamer gel purified.
•
Alternatively, tandem inserts (up to 3) can be found be screeningtransformations of 10:1 insert/vector ligations using annealed oligos.
500 400 300 200 100 1 2 3 4 5 Mks bps Ligated insert (63 bps) 1 2 No. tandem repeats
Expression and Purification
66 45 36 29 24 20 14Mks total lysate pellet supnt washed IBs
•
Insoluble expression•
Cell lysis followed by inclusion body washing gives recombinant product >80% pure.•
CNBr cleavage directly on washed Inclusion bodies kDa KSI-peptide (x2) fusion protein 1 2 3 IBs washCyanogen Bromide Cleavage
66 45 36 29 24 20 14 x1 x1 x2 x3 x3 Number of inserts x3 x2 x1 KSI•
Cleavage in 80% formic acid(inclusion bodies soluble under these conditions)
•
Cleavage highly efficient.•
Reaction diluted and then lyophilisedkDa
Expected position of fusion protein
Extraction from lyophilised CNBr digrest
•
Hydrophilic peptides extracted with aqueous buffers (16h, stirring)•
Hydrophobic peptides extracted with acetonitrile/water/TFA mixtures.•
Peptide further purified by preparative rpHPLCHis
Tag
Peptide-HS Peptide-HSL
Reverse-phase HPLC of extracted 20-mer peptide using phosphate buffer
Conversion / Modification
•
Peptides generated with a mixture of homoserine and homoserine lactone at their C-terminus. OH CH2 CH2 CH COOH NH O H2C CH2 CH C NH O Homoserine Homoserine Lactone•
If modified residue at the C-terminus is undesired – a stop codon can be added before the His-tag.•
Homoserine lactone can be hydrolysed to homoserine by treatment with NaOH(0.2M for 16h)
•
Homoserine can be lactonized to homoserine lactone by treatment with TFA (Offord (1972), Biochem J., 129, p499)•
Lactonized peptide can be easily modified by amine-containing substituents. Derivatives of biotin, fluorescein, ANS, etc, are available from Molecular probes.Yields
Peptide A20fmdv2 A20lap2 DBD1 TGFβ3 No. tandem Repeats 1 2 3 2 2 2 Yield of fusion protein (mg/l) 160 180 (130) 240 80 (70) 80 (65) (70) Yield of purified peptide (mg/l) 16 19 (7) 24 30 (15) 7.4 (5.3) (10)Expression yields from LB medium shown in black; minimal medium in blue
•
Yields comparable to other workers using KSI-fusions•
Modest increase in yield with tandem inserts.•
Losses predominantly at the extraction stage after CNBr cleavage (typically 30-50% efficient).Heteronuclear Saturation Transfer Difference (STD) NMR
Integrin (αvβ6)
RGD peptide ligand
•
Valuable when there is no structural information about the target protein or complex.STD Intensity
Peptide Sequence
xRGD
L
XX
L
xxxx
A problem with 1D STD NMR for peptide ligands is signal overlap. Data is acquired from the unbound peptide that is often in a random coil conformation.
ST Reference STD with EDTA ST Difference
6L,10L,13L
DiCara et al. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 9657-9665.
3V,17V 7R,19R
STD NMR experiment for A20fmdv2 binding to αvβ6
Not possible to distinguish L, V and R shifts
A solution is to separate into a second dimension… 13C 1H Saturation transfer 1H / ppm 13C 1H Saturation transfer Correlation 1H / ppm 13 C / ppm 2D STD NMR 1D STD NMR
A solution is to separate into a second dimension… 13C 1H Saturation transfer 1H / ppm 13C 1H Saturation transfer Correlation 1H / ppm 13 C / ppm 2D STD NMR 1D STD NMR
13C HSQC [0.5h] 13C HSQC with STD editing [43h]
1H / ppm 13 C / ppm
2D heteronuclear-edited Saturation Transfer Difference (STD) NMR (13C)
αvβ6 integrin (10 µM) + 13C-labelled A20fmdv2 (2 mM) 18A 17V 16K 20T 6L,10L, 13L 1H / ppm
Also 15N-edited two-dimensional STD NMR
avβ6 integrin (10 µM) + 15N-labelled A20fmdv2 (2 mM)
2D 15N edited STD NMR [29h]
Backbone 15NH only.
•
Nucleus-specific data from 15N and/or 13C-labelled peptides will enable moreprecise mapping of the ligand in close contact with the target protein.
•
Better insight into the binding interaction and conformation of bound peptide.Acknowledgements
University of Kent: Jane Wagstaff Mark Howard Kevin Howland Michelle RoweCRUK Tumour Biology Centre - Queen Mary’s College
John Marshall
Funding
Lactoferrin (12 aa) 6mg/l (LB)
Beta-amyloid (16 aa) 10mg/l (MM) Alpha-factor (13 aa) 56mg/l (LB) LF12 (11 aa) 6mg/l (LB)