• No results found

Set Top Boxes A L F R E D O G U T I E R R E Z A P R I L,

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Set Top Boxes A L F R E D O G U T I E R R E Z A P R I L,"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

A L F R E D O G U T I E R R E Z

A P R I L , 2 0 1 5

(2)

Presentation Overview

2

Objective: Seeking TF approval of draft workpaper

Measure Description

Workpaper Methodology

Results

Issues and Concerns

(3)

Base Case

Measure Case

Base case technology name

Non-Energy Star Box

Energy Star 2.0

Measure case technology

name

Energy Star 3.0

Energy Star 4.1

3

(4)

Measure Description

4

Units:

per unit

Measure Application and Delivery Type

Midstream Incentive (ROB)

Midstream Incentive (RET)

Eligibility

Climate Zones: All

Building Types: Residential Single Family

Target Market

Residential Sector

Market Potential

(5)

Measure Description

5

Measure Costs

The following costs are currently unknown

Baseline cost (material + labor)

Measure cost

Incremental cost

Industry has kept these costs confidential

EUL

6 year (DEER EUL ID: To be Requested)

NTG

(6)

Workpaper Methodology: Baseline

6

Baseline data collection

SDG&E Plug Load Study

Collected the following parameters from 22 homes

Average Active/Inactive STB Power (kW)

Hours Watched per Day – Active/Inactive Hours

M&E Study

Experimental Design Found that those customers offered the upgrade offer

had upgraded their STB at an 11 times higher rate than the control group who

did not receive the same offer.

Pay TV Provider

Energy usage for non-Energy Star boxes for SD, HD, HD-DVR

Baseline methodology

Yearly Energy Consumption:

Yearly Consumption (kWh/year) = [(Average Active Power*Active Hours

Watched per Day) + (Average Inactive Power*Inactive Hours per Day)]*(365

days/year)*(1 Watt/kW)

(7)

Workpaper Methodology: Measure

7

Measure data collection

Energy Star Specs

Version 3.0

Version 4.1

Measure methodology

Energy Star Specs provide Total Energy Consumption Values

(8)

Workpaper Methodology: Measure

8

DEER Interactive Effects

CFL Interactive effects used as proxy

Account for reduce heat load within the home

Therms will be found from DEER factors

Coincident Diversity Factor

Found from SDG&E field study

Type Average DEER Peak Reduction Factor

Cable 28.33% Cable HD 35.56% Cable HD DVR 24.60% Satellite 21.09% Satellite SD DVR 28.69% Satellite HD DVR 19.58%

(9)

Results

9

Table of Results – kWh (before interactive effects)

Measure Baseline kWh Measure kWh Yearly kWh Savings

Satellite Non Estar STD Def STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 153 35 118 Satellite Non Estar HD STB Upgrade To Satellite HD (ES 3.0) 196 95 101 Satellite Non Estar HD STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 196 60 136 Satellite Non Estar HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite HD (ES 3.0) 243 140 103 Satellite Non Estar HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 243 105 138 Satellite Estar 2.0 HD STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 123 60 63 Satellite Estar 2.0 HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 183 105 78 Satellite Non Estar STD Def STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 4.1 153 30 123 Satellite Non Estar HD STB Upgrade To Satellite HD (ES 4.1) 196 70 126 Satellite Non Estar HD STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 4.1 196 35 161 Satellite Non Estar HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite HD (ES 4.1) 243 115 128 Satellite Non Estar HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 4.1 243 80 163

(10)

Results

10

Table of Results – kW (before interactive/CDF effects)

Measure Baseline kW Measure kW kW Savings

Satellite Non Estar STD Def STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 0.01751 0.00400 0.01351 Satellite Non Estar HD STB Upgrade To Satellite HD (ES 3.0) 0.02233 0.01084 0.01148 Satellite Non Estar HD STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 0.02233 0.00685 0.01548 Satellite Non Estar HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite HD (ES 3.0) 0.02769 0.01598 0.01171 Satellite Non Estar HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 0.02769 0.01199 0.01571 Satellite Estar 2.0 HD STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 0.01404 0.00685 0.00719 Satellite Estar 2.0 HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 3.0 0.02089 0.01199 0.00890 Satellite Non Estar STD Def STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 4.1 0.01751 0.00342 0.01408 Satellite Non Estar HD STB Upgrade To Satellite HD (ES 4.1) 0.02233 0.00799 0.01434 Satellite Non Estar HD STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 4.1 0.02233 0.00400 0.01833 Satellite Non Estar HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite HD (ES 4.1) 0.02769 0.01313 0.01456 Satellite Non Estar HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 4.1 0.02769 0.00913 0.01856 Satellite Estar 2.0 HD STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 4.1 0.01404 0.00400 0.01005 Satellite Estar 2.0 HD DVR STB Upgrade To Satellite Thin Client ES 4.1 0.02089 0.00913 0.01176

(11)

Issues and Concerns

11

Abstract Review Comments from the Cal TF

Program Delivery

SCE’s M&E team performed a study to show program

influenced adoption of measure through it’s incentives

Effective Useful Life

ECOVA study determined life was between 5-7 years

(12)

Issues and Concerns – Future Updates

12

Increase monitored sample size

Help gain confidence in the data used to calculate savings

Cost

(13)

Questions or Comments?

References

Related documents

The CareTrack Australia study was designed to estab- lish baseline estimates of the appropriateness of care de- livered, at a population level, for 22 common conditions [ 22 ].

When the mutant cd types are rare, they almost certainly mate with cc's. A heterozygote offspring will defect. The expected total payoff to a heterozygote offspring

The AIH Diplomate Editor Jas Singh, PhD, CIH Editorial Assistant Lisa Van Wagner Designer Billy Stryker Mission Statement The AIH Diplomate is intended to inform Academy of

Associations Between Recent Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and Blood Pressure in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)..

Our aim was to ascertain the rate of management (percentage of encounters) of WAD among patients attending Australian general practice, and to review management of these

ited access to English language-based communication, infre- quent contact with clinicians familiar with their language and culture, and the challenging experience of working with

Conclusions: Prone position exercises may improve patient tolerance and satisfaction and reduce the need for intravenous sedation for those with single level vertebral

Methods: Sixteen patients who had undergone unilateral ACL reconstruction were divided into two groups based on the results of manual pivot shift testing: 1) Pivot group; and 2)