• No results found

Remarks of Equivalence among Picard, Mann, and Ishikawa Iterations in Normed Spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Remarks of Equivalence among Picard, Mann, and Ishikawa Iterations in Normed Spaces"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Volume 2007, Article ID 61434,5pages doi:10.1155/2007/61434

Review Article

Remarks of Equivalence among Picard, Mann, and Ishikawa

Iterations in Normed Spaces

Xue Zhiqun

Received 1 April 2007; Revised 16 April 2007; Accepted 21 June 2007

Recommended by J. R. L. Webb

We show that the convergence of Picard iteration is equivalent to the convergence of Mann iteration schemes for various Zamfirescu operators. Our result extends of Soltuz (2005).

Copyright © 2007 Xue Zhiqun. This is an open access article distributed under the Cre-ative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

LetEbe a real normed space,Da nonempty convex subset ofE, andTa self-map ofD, letp0,u0,x0∈D. The Picard iteration is defined by

pn+1=T pn, n≥0. (1.1)

The Mann iteration is defined by

un+1=

1−anun+anTun, n≥0. (1.2)

The Ishikawa iteration is defined by

yn=1−bnxn+bnTxn, n≥0, xn+1=

1−anxn+anT yn, n≥0, (1.3)

where{an},{bn}are sequences of positive numbers in [0, 1]. Obviously, foran=1, the Mann iteration (1.2) reduces to the Picard iteration, and forbn=0, the Ishikawa iteration (1.3) reduces to the Mann iteration (1.2).

(2)

if, for each pair x,yin D,T satisfies at least one of the following conditions given in (1)–(3):

(1)Tx−T y ≤ax−y;

(2)Tx−T y ≤b(x−Tx+y−T y); (3)Tx−T y ≤c(x−T y+y−Tx).

It is easy to show that every Zamfirescu operatorTsatisfies the inequality

Tx−T y ≤δx−y+ 2δx−Tx (1.4)

for allx,y∈D, whereδ=max{a,b/(1−b),c/(1−c)} with 0< δ <1 (See S¸oltuz [1]). Recently, S¸oltuz [1] had studied that the equivalence of convergence for Picard, Mann, and Ishikawa iterations, and proved the following results.

Theorem 1.2 [1, Theorem 1]. Let X be a normed space,Da nonempty, convex, closed subset of X, andT :D→Dan operator satisfying condition Z (Zamfirescu operator). If u0=x0∈D, let{un}∞n=0be defined by (1.2) foru0∈D, and let{xn}∞n=0be defined by (1.3)

forx0∈Dwith{an}in[0, 1]satisfying

n=0an= ∞. Then the following are equivalent:

(i)the Mann iteration (1.2) converges to the fixed point ofT; (ii)the Ishikawa iteration (1.3) converges to the fixed point ofT.

Theorem 1.3 [1, Theorem 2]. Let X be a normed space,Da nonempty, convex, closed subset of X, andT :D→Dan operator satisfying condition Z (Zamfirescu operator). If u0=p0∈D, let{pn}∞n=0be defined by (1.1) forp0∈D, and let{un}∞n=0be defined by (1.2)

foru0∈Dwith{an}in[0, 1]satisfyingn∞=0an= ∞andan→0asn→ ∞. Then

(i)if the Mann iteration (1.2) converges tox∗andlimn→∞(un+1−un/an)=0, then the Picard iteration (1.1) converges tox∗,

(ii)if the Picard iteration (1.1) converges tox∗andlimn→∞(pn+1−pn/an)=0, then

the Mann iteration (1.2) converges tox∗.

However, in the above-mentioned theorem, it is unnecessary that, for two conditions, limn→∞(un+1−un/an)=0 and limn→∞(pn+1−pn/an)=0. The aim of this paper is to show that the convergence of Picard iteration schemes is equivalent to the convergence of the Mann iteration for Zamfirescu operators in normed spaces. The result improves ones announced by S¸oltuz [1, Theorem 2]. We will use a special case of the following lemma.

Lemma1.4 [2]. Let{an}and{σn}be nonnegative real sequences satisfying the following inequality:

an+1

1−λnan+σn, (1.5)

whereλn∈(0, 1), for alln≥n0,

n=1λn= ∞, andσn/λn→0asn→ ∞. Thenlimn→∞an=

0.

(3)

2. Main results

Theorem2.1. LetEbe a normed space,Da nonempty closed convex subset ofE, andT: D→Da Zamfirescu operator. Suppose thatThas a fixed pointq∈D. Let{pn}∞n=0be defined

by (1.1) forp0∈D, and let{un}∞n=0be defined by (1.2) foru0∈Dwith{an}in[0, 1]and satisfying∞n=0an= ∞. Then the following are equivalent:

(i)the Picard iteration (1.1) converges to the fixed point ofT; (ii)the Mann iteration (1.2) converges to the fixed point ofT.

Proof. Letqbe a fixed point ofT. We will prove (ii)(i). Suppose thatun−q →0 as n→ ∞. Applying (1.1) and (1.2), we have

un+1pn+1

1−anun−T pn+anTun−T pn

1−anun−Tun+Tun−T pn. (2.1)

Using (1.4) withx=un,y=pn, we have

TunT pnδunpn+ 2δunTun. (2.2)

Therefore, from (2.1), we get

un+1pn+1δunpn+

1−an+ 2δun−Tun

≤δun−pn+1−an+ 2δun−q+Tun−Tq

≤δun−pn+1−an+ 2δ(1 +δ)un−q,

(2.3)

denoted byAn= un−pn,δ=1−λ, andBn=(1−an+ 2δ)(1 +δ)un−q. ByLemma

1.4, we obtainAn= un−pn →0 asn→ ∞. Hence bypn−q ≤ un−pn+un−q, we getpn−q →0 asn→ ∞.

Next, we will prove (i)(ii), that is, if the Picard iteration converges, then the Mann iteration does too. Now by using Picard iteration (1.1) and Mann iteration (1.2), we have

un+1pn+1

1−anun−T pn+anTun−T pn

1−anun−pn+1−anpn−T pn+anTun−T pn

1−anun−pn+1−anpn−q+T pn−Tq+anTun−T pn. (2.4)

On using (1.4) withx=pn,y=un, we get

TunT pnanδunpn+ 2anδpnT pn

(4)

Again, using (1.4) withx=q,y=pn, we get

T pnTqδpnq. (2.6)

Hence by (2.4)–(2.6), we obtain

un+1pn+1

1(1−δ)anun−pn+1−an+ 2anδ(1 +δ)pn−q

1(1−δ)anun−q+1−an+ 2anδ(2 +δ)pn−q

1−λan1−λan−1un−1−q+

1−an+ 2anδ(2 +δ)pn−q

1−λan1−λan−1

···1−λa0u0−q

+1−an+ 2anδ(2 +δ)pn−q

exp

−λn

i=0

ai

u0q+

1−an+ 2anδ(2 +δ)pn−q,

(2.7)

where 1−δ=λ. Sincen=0an= ∞andpn−q →0 as n→ ∞, henceun−pn →0

asn→ ∞. And thus,un−q ≤ un−pn+pn−q →0 asn→ ∞. This completes the

proof.

Remark 2.2. Theorem 2.1improves [1, Theorem 2] in the following sense.

(1) Both hypotheses limn→∞(un+1−un/an)=0 and limn→∞(pn+1−pn/an)=0 have been removed, and the conclusion remains valid.

(2) The assumption thatu0=p0in [1] is superfluous.

Theorem2.3. LetEbe a normed space,Da nonempty closed convex subset ofE, andT: D→Da Zamfirescu operator. Suppose thatThas a fixed pointq∈D. Let{pn}∞n=0be defined

by (1.1) for p0∈D, and let{xn}∞n=0be defined by (1.3) forx0∈Dwith{an}and{bn}in [0, 1]and satisfying∞n=0an= ∞. Then the following are equivalent:

(i)the Picard iteration (1.1) converges to the fixed point ofT; (ii)the Ishikawa iteration (1.3) converges to the fixed point ofT.

Remark 2.4. As previously suggested,Theorem 2.3reproduces exactly [1, Theorem 1]. Therefore we have the following conclusion: Picard iteration converges to the fixed point ofT Mann iteration converges to the fixed point ofT Ishikawa iteration converges to the fixed point ofT.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the referee and the editor for their careful reading of the manuscript and their many valuable comments and suggestions. The project is supported by the National Science Foundation of China and Shijiazhuang Railway Institute Sciences Foundation.

References

(5)

[2] F. P. Vasilev,Numerical Methods for Solving Extremal Problems, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 2nd edi-tion, 1988.

[3] X. Weng, “Fixed point iteration for local strictly pseudo-contractive mapping,”Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 727–731, 1991.

Xue Zhiqun: Department of Mathematics and Physics, Shijiazhuang Railway Institute, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

References

Related documents

A detailed analysis of the only fatal case ob- served during the period covered by this study is consistent with known factors related to the risk of a  fulminant course of

With all the difficulties that nu- clear technology has encountered in the last few years, France and Japan have been among the few countries to maintain aggressive expansion of

assessed population –represented by hypertensive elderly who did not practice any physical activity, with low education and income levels – presented the highest BMI and AC

The ethanolic and aqueous extract of the rhizomes of this plant were investigated for their antifertility activity in female rats The identification of the secondary

In countries where the guidelines of the CPIC are used to guide pharmacother- apy, the number of prescriptions with a combination of actionable phenotypes and associated drugs

Our in vitro cell line experiments focused on macro- phages as these are the predominant immune cell type in PitNETs, and we selected RAW 264.7 macrophages for a number of reasons:

Keywords: Academic Labour, UK Academia, Metrics, Metric Culture, Higher Education Poli- cy, Neoliberalism, Resistance, Co-operative University, Trade Unions.. What does it mean to be