• No results found

Approach for OSS & Cloud Computing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Approach for OSS & Cloud Computing"

Copied!
29
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Approach for

OSS & Cloud Computing

October 20

th

, 2009

Fujitsu Limited

Platform Solution Unit

General Manager

Masatoshi YOSHIDA

(2)

1.Approach for Linux

(3)

IA Server Lineup

IA Server Lineup

IA servers for various areas

„

Fujitsu IA Server covers wide range (from volume zone to mission critical

area) with open platform (Intel Architecture + Linux/Windows).

大規模基幹システム

基幹システム

アプリケーションサーバ データベースサーバ

部門・インターネット

DNSサーバ メールサーバ WEBサーバ 新し い 分 野 へ の L i n u x 適用 範 囲 拡大 幅広いラインナップによる適用領域の拡大

コンパクトサーバ

タワー型&ラック型

ブレードサーバ

●省エネ ●静音 ●省スペース ●1way~4way ●マルチコア ●高可用性 ●高速ネットワーク ●高密度実装 ●省エネ ●省スペース ●システムミラー機構 ●高可用性 ●フレキシブルI/O ●ハードウェアの冗長化・活性保守

PCサーバ PRIMERGY

Linux、Windows)

基幹

IAサーバ PRIMEQUEST

Linux、Windows)

Large Mission Critical System

Application Server Database Server DNS Server Mail Server Web Server Smaller System/Internet

Enlarged IA Server Adoption Area

Enlarged

Linux

Adoption

Area

●energy saving ●silent ●compact ●1way~4way ●multi cores

●System Mirror Function ●high availability ●flexible I/O

●redundant hardware

Mission Critical System

●high availability ●fast network ●high-density packaging ●energy saving ●small Blade Server Compact Server Tower/Rack Server

Mission Critical IA Server PRIMEQUEST

(4)

Position of Linux

Position of Linux

Linux is considered as primary IT infrastructure

„

Fujitsu applies its Mainframe/UNIX technology and know-how for

enhancement of Linux functions and Linux support .

Developed

Linux infrastructure Adopted Linux for mission

critical area/Support enhancement Started to supply high reliable solution for wider Linux adoption Enhanced Mission Critical functions

(The latest kernel, Virtualization, dump etc)

| 99 | 2000 | 01 |02 | 03 | 04 | 05 |06 | 07 | 08 IA servers expansion

Strategic partnership with Red Hat Foundation of Platform Solution Center Linux on mission critical IA server Linux enhancement

Launch of Linux support service Commercial middleware on Linux

(year) ~

Fujitsu Linux Business Time-Line

create production Customers Red Hat (Distributer) ・System validation ・Support OSS Community ・Development Linux Kernel Fedora supply production

Cooperation with Red Hat and Communities

Added new entry model and supplied the appropriate platform

Used Linux and commercial middleware for servers

・Strategic ・Quality ・Quality enhancement management partnership

(5)

Case Studies

–Linux for Mission Critical

Area-Case Studies

–Linux for Mission Critical

Area-„

In Japan, there has been many cases that adopt Linux for mission

critical area recently .

„

For example, Linux is used for the Next-Generation Trading System in

Tokyo Stock Exchange and the registration system in Ministry of Justice.

Tokyo Stock Exchange

Linux for the Next-Generation

Trading System

Ministry of Justice

Linux for the registration system

(6)

2.Approach for OSS

(7)

OSS Market Forecast in Japan

OSS Market Forecast in Japan

OSS Market Forecast by 2017(surveyed by IPA in 2008)

IPA: Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan

Market without disincentive

(year) 【2007 Market】

Whole:13,370.8 billion yen(100%) Potential: 2,822.1 billion yen(21.1%) Currently using: 687.2 billion yen(5.4%)

【2010 Market】

Whole:13,712.2 billion yen(100%) Potential: 4,972.0 billion yen(36.3%) Non-disincentive: 1,835.8 billion yen(13.4%)

Currently using: 784.4 billion yen(5.5%)

【2017 Market】

Whole:14,543.1 billion yen(100%) Potential: 6,257.3 billion yen(43.0%) Non-disincentive: 5,246.3 billion yen(36.1%) Currently using : 1,070.3 billion yen(7.4%)

【whole Market】 0.8% growth for 10 years

【Potential Market】 8.3% growth for 10 years

【Market without disincentive】 22.5% growth for 10 years

【Currently Using OSS】 4.5% growth for 10 years Whole market

Currently using OSS Potential OSS Market (Hundred Million yen)

(8)

OSS Usage in Japan

OSS Usage in Japan

„

OSS Usage in Japanese Company (surveyed by IPA in 2008)

68% of companies use OSS, and over 90% of companies have an

interest.

Entrusted System Development (OSS from customers)

249 companies (37.6%) Entrusted System Development (internal use) 171 companies (25.8%) Package including OSS

56 companies (8.4%)

OSS as sub business 104 companies (15.7%) OSS with internet service 55 companies (8.3%) Database service 18 companies (2.7%) OSS stack 9 companies (1.4%) Commercial OSS 1 company (0.2%)

Has an interest in

OSS (7.3%)

Have an

interest in OSS,

but does

nothing

(19.8%)

Plans to use

OSS (4.8%)

Using OSS for

internal use

(12.2%)

Using OSS with

customer systems,

but not so many

cases (40.2%)

Using OSS with many

customer system; Has

much knowledge and

experience(15.6%)

(9)

Adoption of Open Source Application Server in Japan

Adoption of Open Source Application Server in Japan

22.4

25.2

11.1

14.0

6.5

12.7

19.6

15.0

14.4

13.1

11.5

13.5

29.4

30.7

26.7

35.6

43.3

37.0

28.7

29.1

47.8

37.4

38.7

36.8

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

5,000~(n=143)

1000~4,999(n=127)

500~999(n=90)

100~499(n=222)

~100(n=506)

Total(n=1,088)

Have alrea dy adopted

Now considring adoption

Will consider adoption soon

Have no plan to adopt

Figure: Adoption of Open Source Application Server in Japan By Size of Employees

Source: IDC Japan, Sep 2009, Japan Open Source Software End-User Survey 2009, #J9370102

(10)

OSS Merits and Demerits

OSS Merits and Demerits

0.7 20.0 5.6 2.6 5.3 6.9 16.6 24.1 26.9 32.1 62.9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 その他 わからない 評価していない バージョンアップが頻繁になされている点 関連する情報が豊富に存在している点 顧客側でソースコードを参照、修正できるようになる点 運用コストが低減できる点 一部のOSSではデファクトスタンダードになるほど普及している点 ベンダー依存性が排除できる点 ある程度実用に耐えうる性能、信頼性が備わってきた点 導入コスト(初期コスト)が低減できる点 3.0 23.8 4.8 2.1 2.5 6.6 7.2 9.4 9.6 10.6 17.7 19.0 31.7 34.9 35.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 その他 わからない 懸念を抱いていない 導入コスト(初期コスト)が高いと考えている点 導入までの期間が商用パッケージに比べて長い点 存在するOSSでは顧客の業務、実務にマッチしない点 運用コストが高いと考えている点 既存アプリケーションとの接続性が悪い点 存在するOSSでは機能が不十分な点 システム移行に対する懸念が大きい点 導入実績(事例)の紹介が少ない(信頼性、安定性に懸念がある)点 存在するOSSで実現できることがわかりにくい点 ベンダー、SI事業者の保守・サポートが長期的に保証されない可能性がある点 ベンダー、SI事業者の保守・サポート体制が不安な点 顧客社内にOSSのシステムを管理できる人材がいない点

Source:IPA 「The 2ndOSS Business Survey」 in 2008

Expectation

Reducing Initial Cost

Anxiety①

Anxiety for Support

Anxiety②

Lack of OSS

consultants and solutions

Anxiety③

Anxiety for OSS

Stability and Reliability

Cost is good, but still worry about demerits

OSS

Merit

OSS

Demerit

Low initial cost Enough performance and reliability for practical use Avoiding Vendor lock-in Being de facto standard Low operational cost Source cord available for customers Related information is disclosure Frequent version up We don’t evaluate OSS

Not sure Others

Customers can’t manage OSS

Vendor/SI company support is not reliable Vendor/SI company support is not long-termed OSS functions aren’t clear

Stability and reliability is not trustable Migration is not reliable Function is not enough Connectivity with existing application is not good Operational cost is expensive OSS doesn’t match with customer’s request

Setup takes longer than commercial software Initial cost is expensive No Demerit Not sure Others

(11)

OSSC (OSS Center)

Case II

To Resolve Anxiety: Fujitsu’s Case

To Resolve Anxiety: Fujitsu’s Case

Anxiety①

Anxiety for Support

Anxiety②

Lack of OSS

consultants and solutions

Anxiety③

Anxiety for OSS

Stability and Reliability

Special consultants

of

Linux/OSS

SupportDesk

Case I

PSC(

Platform Solution Center

Case III

Cooperation

Cooperation

Fujitsu prepares the strategies to remove demerits

Validation center to

check the system

without any cost before

investing in the system

High quality one-stop

support for hardware

and OS with distributer

(12)

Case I

SupportDesk

Case I

SupportDesk

Fujitsu

SupportDesk)

Fujitsu Linux/OSS engineers

support trouble resolution

Fujitsu Linux/OSS engineers

support trouble resolution

Fujitsu Engineer

Questions

Red Hat

Fujitsu-Red Hat

The Joint Development

Organization

(Boston)

Support

Support

・Analyze the cause

・Modify the code

Fujitsu

On-site

Engineer

c

Fujitsu supports at the front line

Red Hat support as back line

Cooperation with OSS Vendors

Backline support

According to support level;

•Answer questions

•Analyze log and dump

•Suggest strategies for avoidance

OSS Vendors

Coo

per

atio

n

Trouble

report

Customer

(13)

Case II

OSSC (OSS Center)

Case II

OSSC (OSS Center)

OSSC

SupportDesk

[Fujitsu]

Organizing companies

which have skills

on Linux/OSS

OSS total package

with support

FJB]

Comprehensive

web solutions

FJTH]

[G Search]

OSS middleware

support on

Linux/Windows/Solaris

FSSL]

Linux/OSS support

(SUSE/MIRACLE/Turbo)

[PFU]

OSS Vendors

Consultation for OSS

PFU]

Various OSS solutions

[FSSL]

OSS Community /OSS

Promotion organization

(Cooperation)

(Cooperation)

Package using OSS

[Fujitsu group]

PSC(validation)

Fujitsu]

(14)

Case II

Fujitsu’s total solutions

Case II

Fujitsu’s total solutions

Best software to achieve customer’s requirements

高信頼

高性能

長期サポート

オープン性

(初期)コスト

先進性

JBoss

Enterprise Application Platform

PHP

Tomcat

JBoss

Application Server

PostgreSQL

MySQL

MySQL

Enterprise

Apache

Groundwork

Nagios

Red Hat

Cluster Suite

よりシステム規模の

大きな領域

より信頼性や性能

要件の高い領域

PRIMECLUSTER

For Larger System

For More

Robust System

Highly-reliable

High performance

Extended support

Open

Less expensive

Innovative

(15)

Case III

Platform Solution Center

Case III

Platform Solution Center

™

Area size : 3,600㎡

™

Facilities : More than 380 servers and storages

™

Rooms : 18 validation rooms and 12 seminar/

consultation rooms

™

Staff : About 300 specialists in various fields

One of the biggest validation center in Japan

Server room

Briefing room

Validation room

(16)

3.Contribution to Communities

(17)

„

Function Enhancement

„

Development of functions necessary for Linux mission critical

system

„

Detection and modification of found issues in adopting Linux to

mission critical system

http://www.linuxfoundation.org/publications/whowriteslinux.pdf

Approach for Linux Functions Enhancement

Approach for Linux Functions Enhancement

Top 10 Contributing IT Companies to Linux Kernel after the release of Kernel 2.6.24

(THE LINUX FOUNDATION/Linux Kernel Development)

10

No.

No.

2.3%

1,480

Consultant

6.3%

4,150

IBM

3.1%

2,003

Oracle

12.0%

7,897

Red Hat

4.2%

2,765

Unknown

21.1%

13,850

None

1.7%

1,142

Parallels

6.1%

4,021

Novell

6.0%

Percent

of Total

3,923

Number of

Changes

Intel

Company

Name

1,007

Number of

Changes

Fujitsu

Company

Name

1.5%

Percent

of Total

(18)

Contribution to Xen community

Contribution to Xen community

The share of added extension/modification codes (1509) to Xen in 2007

second semester (counted by Fujitsu).

After then, Secure platform project

*1

actively has contributed to

community.

*1

ASET (Association of Super-Advanced Electronics Technologies) project

Citrix/XenSource

(42.5%)

Novell/SUSE(9.7%)

Intel(6.0%)

HP(3.8%)

AMD(3.2%)

Tristan(3.2%)

(privately)

IBM(3.0%)

Debian.org(2.5%)

Red Hat(2.3%)

Sun(1.8%)

Others(6.2%)

Fujitsu(15.7%)

(19)

Creation of OSS List for TRM

Creation of OSS List for TRM

OSS Promotion

Forum

Application Sub

Committee

各社

Promotion system>

OSS Promotion

Forum

web site

Publication image>

OSS list

for TRM

各社

Individual

companies

各社

各社

Each company’s

TRM

linkage

「TRM」:Technical Reference Model for information system procurement, published by

METI and IPA in December 2008.

・Some functions and services on TRM are provided by not only software/middleware

layer, but also appliance products, hardware layer (such as networking device) or

other services to function.

<The Japan OSS Promotion Forum>

http://www.ipa.go.jp/software/open/forum/

TRM image>

PostgreSQL MySQL Data Warehouse 5.1.3 Pentaho Business Intelligence 5.1.2 iReport Reporting Tools 5.1.11 5.1 BI/DWH/ETL Remarks OSS Functions, Services Chapter

(20)

FYI)Publicated TRM image

(21)

4.Approach for Cloud Computing

(22)

21

Customer Expectations of Cloud

Customer Expectations of Cloud

Speed of Deployment

Released from Operation

The Right IT Costs & Improved Convenience

Flexibility

Reductions in

Investment risk

(23)

Issues Concerning Cloud

Issues Concerning Cloud

Reliability?

Security?

(24)

Reduction in Investment risk

Reduction in Investment risk

Virtual Platform

Customer

End user

Portal

Assign resource

Resource Pool

Datacenter

Datacenters provide just

(25)

Speed of Deployment

Speed of Deployment

Select Template

Select Template

Application

Application

Customization

Network Set-up

System Set-up

System Infra Design

Operation

Maintenance

Focus on Application

Development

Focus on Application

Development

Current Process

Customer

End user

(26)

Reliability by Visualization

Reliability by Visualization

Visible Virtualization

platform

Virtualization platform

Portal

Resource pool

Datacenter

(27)

„

Secure VM, Integrated Monitoring,

Terminal authentication, Authorization

„

Available as a extension of the Intranet

Secure Cloud Platform

Secure Cloud Platform

Shared

Company A

Company

B

Public Cloud

Private Cloud

(28)

Reliable & Highly Secure Datacenter

Reliable & Highly Secure Datacenter

„

Disaster Countermeasures

„

Secure Access, Operation

Earthquake bracing

PalmSecure

Monitoring of

accompanied

(29)

Thank you very much

谢谢

감사합니다

References

Related documents