• No results found

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON BY-LAW. To amend By-law , as amended

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON BY-LAW. To amend By-law , as amended"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON

BY-LAW

Number ____

~q...<i_,

__

.'---'~:....:.OC--OS

_ __

To amend By-law 270-2004, as amended

The Council of The Corporation of the City of Brampton ENACTS as follows:

1. By-law 270-2004, as amended, is hereby further amended:

(l) by changing on Sheet 7 A of Schedule A thereto, the zoning designation of the

lands shown outlined on Schedule A to this by-law:

FROM TO

AGRICULTURAL (A) Service Section Holding 1891).

Commercial Section 1890 (SC 1890) and Service Commercial Section 1891 (SC (H) Section

(2) by adding thereto, the following sections:

1890 The lands designated SC - Section 1890 of Schedule A to

this By-law:

1890.1 shall only be used for the following purposes:

1. retail establishment having no outside storage;

11. a convenience store;

1Il. a service shop;

iv. a personal service shop;

v. a bank, trust company, finance company;

VI. an office;

vii. a dry cleaning and laundry distribution station;

Vlll. a laundromat;

} IX. a printing or copying establishment;

x. a commercial school;

XI. a dming room restaurant; and

(2)

2

1890.2 shall be subject to the following requirements and

restrictions:

(1) Minimum Front Yard Depth

4.0 metres

(2) Minimum Interior Side Yard Width

2 metres except where the zone abuts a SC Section 1891 Zone then 0 metres

(3) Minimum Rear Yard Depth: 7.5 metres

(4) Maximum Building Height:

1 Storey

(5) Minimum Rear Yard Landscape Strip:

7.8 metres

(6)

Minimum Front Yard Landscape Strip:

4.0 metres

(7) All garbage and refuse containers shall be enclosed within a climate-controlled room within the

building.

(8) For the purposes of this zone, taverns are not

permitted.

(9) For the purposes of this zone, the lot line, which

abuts Mayfield Road shall be deemed the Front Lot Line.

(10) Drive-thru facilities for restaurant uses shall not be permitted.

(11) Drive-thru facilities shall not be located adjacent to public roads or within 7.8 metres of a residential zone.

1890.3 shall also be subject to the requirements and restrictions of

the SC zone and all the general provisions of this by-law, which are not in conflict with the ones set out in section 1890.2.

1890.4 notwithstanding any other provision of this Zoning By-law,

to the contrary, the lands zoned Service Commercial Section 1890 (SC Section 1890), save and except the part of

Mayfield Road, shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes.

(3)

1891

3

The lands designated SC (H) - Section 1891 of Schedule A to this By-law:

1891.1 shall only be used for the following purposes:

1. retail establishment having no outside storage;

11. a convenience store;

iii. a service shop;

iv. a personal service shop;

v. a bank, trust company, finance company;

vi. an office;

vii. a dry cleaning and laundry distribution station;

viii. a laundromat;

ix. a printing or copying establishment;

x. a commercial school;

xi. a dining room restaurant; and

xii. a take-out restaurant.

1891.2 shall be subject to the following requirements and

restrictions:

(1) Minimum Front Yard Depth 4.0 metres

(2) Minimum Interior Side Yard Width

2 metres except where the zone abuts a SC Section 1890 Zone then 0 metres

(3) Minimum Exterior Side Yard Width

4.0 metres

(4) Minimum Rear Yard Depth:

7.5 metres

(5) Maximum Building Height:

1 Storey

(6) Minimum Rear Yard Landscape Strip:

7.8 metres

(7) Minimum Front Yard Landscape Strip:

, 4.0 metres

(8) Minimum Exterior Side Yard Landscape Strip:

4.0 metres

(9) All garbage and refuse containers shall be enclosed

within a climate-controlled room within the building.

(4)

4

(10) For the purposes of this zone, the lot line, which abuts Mayfield Road shall be deemed the Front Lot Line.

(11) For the proposes of this zone, any lot line, which abuts the Summer Valley Drive right-of-way shall be deemed the Exterior Side Lot Line.

(12) Drive-thru facilities for restaurant uses shall not be permitted.

(13) Drive-thru facilities shall not be located adjacent to public roads or within 7.8 metres of a residential zone.

(14) For the purposes of this zone, taverns are not permitted.

(15) The holding (H) symbol shall not be removed until the City of Brampton has confirmed that Block 196 on 43M-1276 has been merged on title with the remaining portion of the SC(H) - Section 1891 zone.

(16) Until the holding (H) symbol is removed, the lands designated SC (H) - SECTION 1891, shall only be used for those purposes permitted in the

Agricultural (A) Zone as set out in Section 46.1.1, subject to the requirements and restrictions of the Agricultural (A) zone, and all the general provisions of this by-law.

1891.3 shall also be subject to the requirements and restrictions of the SC zone and all the general provisions of this by-law, which are not in conflict with the ones set out in section 1891.2.

1891.4 upon removal of the holding (H) symbol for the lands designated SC (H) -SECTION 1891, notwithstanding any other provision of this Zoning By-law, to the contrary, the lands zoned Service Commercial Holding Section 1891 (SC (H) Section 1891) and the lands zoned Service Commercial Section 1890 (SC Section 1890), save and except the part of Mayfield Road, shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes.

READ a FIRST, SECOND and THIRD TIME and PASSED in OPEN COUNCIL, this ~,,,,,,, day of

Sept.",bte.".

2005.

(5)

5

Director of Planning and Land Development Services APPROVED

AS TO FORAI

LAW DEPT.

(6)

SC-SECTION 1890

SC(H)-SECTION 1891

I

WOODCREEK DRIVE

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

Lar 18.CONCESSION I EllS.

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

(

·

,

·

·

/

I

I

I

\

MAYFIELD ROAD

ZON E SOU NDARY

m

CENTRELINE OF ORIGINAL ROAD ALLOWANCE

METRES

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

I

BLOCK 2ZT. R.P.4JM-IZl6

,

\

o

, . . 25 50 I Metres

By.. Law

.2CfI..

aG05

Schedule A

f-P_A_R_T_L_O_T_l_S,_C_O_N_C_E_S_SI_O_N_l_Eo_H_oS_o

- - - - I

~

CITY OF BRAMPTON

Planning, Design and Development

Dale: 2005 08 29 Drawn by: CJK

(7)

\

SUBJECT LANDS

,

HIGHWOOQ­

:r:

I Q _ 0

0

3:

-0

~

«"-T

Lu»f

...J1

1

;0

Lu:i

CRES

~ENT

~

f3:

SWEET

BRIAR

<

~co

C/)

LA NE

»

~o

r

- 0 " ' ­

0

r

r

~

0::::

f1l

~

<:(

0

-<

~?

~ 5:/~

~

A

ni

WO(DDCREEK

56

- - . . ,

~

bRIVE

I

MAYFIELD ROADI

0

~

0

»

~---\

o

,

I I 2: I

I

P

VIEWNIOUNT

::::0

fTl

CR

I

,

0

-<

<

0 I

2Q

I I

-fTl

<

DOKKUM I ,.,.."

{

CR

I

RUMSEY

-i~

Key Map By-Law

CITY OF BRAMPTON

Planning, Design and Development

Date: 2005 08 29 Drawn by: CJK

(8)

---~\.,.'~~---~

\

SUBJECT LANDS

,

HIGHWOOQ.­

_

=r

a

0 , 0 , !::

"- ]l

3r~T

;:0

tJ

~

CRES

~ENT

~

i:!:

SWEET

BRIAR

<

\.CO

C/)

L

,L~N

E

»

~o

I lJ f ' . . . . _

0

r

r

"Y

t : : t ,

f1l

v

« - <

~

I--

, 0

r;

Z

l>

C)

zl>

if

rr,

r;!

WO<DDCREEK

§S

~

DRIVE

MAYFIELD ROAD

o

o

.

u;:---\

o

. ,

2' I

f21

VIEW MOUNT

CR

J i I

DOKKUM

I I

f

CR

I

RUMSEY

CITY OF BRAMPTON

~.

Planning. Design and Development

~

Date: 20050829 Drawn by, CJK

(9)

.'

IN THE MATTER OF the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, sections 17 and 34:

AND IN THE MATTER OF the City of Brampton

Official Plan Amendment and Comprehensive Zoning By-law 270-2004, as amended Glen Schnarr and Associates - File CIEI8.13

DECLARATION

I, Joan LeFeuvre, of the Town of Halton Hills, in the Region of Halton, hereby make oath and say as follows:

1. I am the Deputy Clerk of The Corporation of the City of Brampton and as such have knowledge of the matters herein declared:

)

2. One notice of appeal was filed under section 17(24) and one was filed under section 34(19) of

the Planning Act. The Ontario Municipal Board in its Decision/Order #1081 dated April 11,

2006 ordered that the appeal on the Official Plan Amendment be dismissed. Comprehensive Zoning By-law 270-2004 is amended in the manner set out in "Attachment 1" of the Board Order, attached hereto.

3. Official Plan Amendment OP93-250 and Zoning By-law 298-2005 are deemed to have come into effect on the April 11, 2006, the day the Ontario Board Decision/Order #1081 was issued.

And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing it to be true and knowing that it is of the same force and effect as if made under oath.

DECLARED before me at the City of Brampton in the

Re~ion of Peel this 18t day of April, 2004.

EL~

~

A Commission6, etc.

EILEEN MARGARET COLLIE, ACommissioner etc., Regional Municipality of Peel for

The Corporation of The City of Brampton Expires February 2, 2006.

(10)

L·'-r

ISSUE DATE:

i

cc:

Paul Snape May 10,2006 )51100 Colin Grant DECISION/ORDER NO:

~

'!'!

RECEIVED

,

1389 ~,... CLERK'S DEPT, Ontario

Ontario Municipal Board

MAY

f

t

2006

Commission des affaires municipales de I'Ontario

~,t~'N~~'CIGlg'/3

DiBattista Gambin Developments has appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board under subsection 17(24) of the Planning Act, RS.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, from a decision of the City of Brampton to approve Proposed Amendment No. 93-250 to the Official Plan for the City of Brampton.

OMB File No. 0050173

DiBattista Gambin Developments has appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board under

subsection-34(19)-of-the-Planning-A-ct;-R'S':{);-1990;-c:-P:-t3;-as'amended;-against-Zoning-By=--:----­

law 298-2005 of the City of Brampton. OMB File No. R050256

BE FOR E:

J. de P. Seaborn ) Tuesday, the 9th )

Vice Chair ) day of May, 2006

THESE MATTERS having come on for a public hearing on April 4, 2006, and the Board in its Decision No. 1081, issued April 11, 2006 withheld its Order pending advice from the City that the lands are now under one ownership. This documentation has now been received.

THE BOARD ORDERS:

1.. That Amendment No. 93-250 to the Official Plan for the City of Brampton is approved and the appeal is dismissed.

2. That the appeal is allowed in part, and By-law 298-2005 (as attached in Decision No. 1081) is amended in the following manner:

3. 0) Paragraphs 1891.2 (15) and (16) shall be deleted.

4. (ii) Paragraph 1891.4 shall be modified to remove the reference to the holding symbol.

(11)

ISSUE DATE: April 11, 2006 DECISION/ORDER NO: 1081. CC; Paul Snape Colin Grant PL051100 ~ i ' '

Ontario Municipal Board

Commission des affaires municipales de l'Ontario

DiBattista Gambin Developments has. appealed to the Ontario Municipal Boaref ·l:iilaer subsection 17(24} of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, from a decision of the City of Brampton to approve Proposed Amendment No. 93-250 to the Official Plan for the City of Brampton.

OMB File No. 0050173

DiBattista Gambin Developments has appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board under subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13. as amended. against Zoning By­ law 298-2005 of the City of Brampton.

OMB File No. R050256

APPEARANCES:

Parties Counsel

DiBattista Gabin Developments C. Barnett

English Prestige Properties R.K. Webb,

a.c.

City of Brampton C.C. Cooper

MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY

J.

de P. SEABORN ON APRIL 4. 2006

The matter before the Board consists of two appeals made by DiBattista Garnbin Developments (DiBattista). The first appeal relates to Official Plan Amendment No. 93­ 250 (OPA) which was adopted by the City of Brampton (City) on September 26, 2005. The second appeal relates to Zoning By-law 298-2005 (By-law) which included a holding symbol in respect of certain lands. At the commencement of the hearing, Counsel for DiBattista, English Prestige Homes (the applicant), and the City advised that a settlement had been reached on both appeals. The parties requested the Board to dismiss the appeal with respect to the OPA and allow the appeal, in part, with respect to the By-law, subject to specific modifications. The parties also requested that the Board withhold its order for a short period of time pending completion of the land transaction.

In support of the OPA and Zoning By-law the City called Mr. Todd, an experienced land use planner and member of staff responsible for the matter to provide

(12)

-2- PL051100 expert opinion evidence in support of the approvals sought. The lands are situated on Mayfield Road, in the Snelgrove area at the north boundary of the City. The purpose of the planning instruments is to further commercial development on the lands which will include the acquisition by the owner/applicant of a small sliver of land (Block 196 on 43M-1276) adjacent to Summer Valley Drive. Briefly, Mr. Todd explained that the Holding Zone on Block 196 can be removed once that block and the applicant's lands are merged into one ownership and the entire parcel will then be developed for commercial purposes. In Mr. Todd's opinion, the use of the lands for commercial purposes is appropriate, is compatible with adjacent residential uses, and will contribute positively to the greater Snelgrove area. The project envisages high quality architectural and landscape design and pedestrian friendly amenity space. In addition, the proposed commercial development will enhance the streetscape and provide a strong urban edge at the intersection of Summer Valley Drive and Mayfield Road.

With respect to process, notice of the hearing was given in accordance with the Board's directions and other than the City, the appellant and the applicant no other parties or participants appeared. Mr. Todd confirmed that a puiblic meeting was held by the municipality prior to the enactment of the OPA and By-law and area resident concerns were resolved.

DECISION

Based on the evidence of Mr. Todd and the submissions of the parties the Board finds that the approvals sought represent good planning. Accordingly, the decision of the Board is as follows:

1. The Board Orders that Amendment No. 93-250 to the Official Plan for the City of Brampton is approved and the appeal is dismissed.

2. The Board Orders that the appeal is allowed in part, and By-law 298-2005 (Attachment "1 ") is amended in the following manner:

(i) Paragraphs 1891.2 (15) and (16) shall be deleted.

(ii) Paragraph 1891.4 shall be modified to remove the reference to the holding symbol.

(13)

IJ

-3- PL051100 (iii) Schedule A shall be modified to remove the reference to the

holding symbol.

In all other respects, the Board Orders that the appeal is dismissed.

The Order is withheld until such time as the City advises the Board that the lands are under one ownership.

~M.~ciA-J~e

P. SEABORN VICE CHAIR

(14)
(15)

.. .... ....

~'-II

2

\OlJi

1890.2 shall be subject to the following requirements and

I

restrictions:

I

1890.3

1890.4

(1) Minimum Front Yard Depth 1\

I

!

4.0 metres

I

(2) Minimum Interior Side Yard Width

2 metres except where the zone abuts a SC Section

1891 Zone then 0 metres

II

I

(3) Minimum Rear Yard Depth: 7.5 metres

(4) Maximum Building Height: 1 Storey

I,

(5) Minimum Rear Yard Landscape ~trip:

II

7.8 metres

I

(6) Minimum Front Yard Landscape ~trip: 4.0 metres'

(7) All garbage and refuse containers ,shall be enclosed within a climate-controlled room Within the

building.

(8) For the pUrposes of this zone, tave:ms are not

permitted. :

(9) For the purposes of this zone, the lot line, which abuts Mayfield Road shall be deemed the Front Lot

Line. '.

(10) Drive-thru facilities for restaurant uses shall not be

permitted. ';'

. ,;

(11) Drive-thrufaciIitiesshall not be

lo~,ated

adjacent to public roads or within 7.8 metres

Qi;

a residential zone.

shall also be subject to the requirements

a~~

restrictions of the SC zone and all the general provisions pf this by-law, which are not in conflict with the ones set out in section

1890.2. ·1

notwithstanding any other provision of this :zoning By-law, to the contrary, the lands zoned Service Commercial Section

; f

1890 (SC Section 1890), save and except the part of

Mayfield Road, shall be treated as a

single~ot

for zoning

II

purposes.

II

II

II

,I

II

(16)

11

II

3

Ii \1

Ii

1891 1

The lands designated SC (H) - Section 1891 of Schedule A /

to this By-law:

I

I

1891.1 shall only be used for the following purposes:

"' I. retail establishment having no outside storage;

11. a convenience store;

111. a service shop;

I

I

iv. a personal service shop;

v. a bank, trust company, finance company;

Vl. an office; 1

I

vii. a dry cleaning and laundry distribution station;

II

viii. a laundromat;

ix. a printing or copying establishment; x. a commercial school;

xi. a dining room restaurant; and xii. a take-out restaurant.

1891.2 shall be subject to the following requirements and restrictions:

I

(1) Minimum Front Yard Depth

,

4.0

metres

I

!

(2) Minimum Interior Side Yard Width

2 metres except where the zone a\:mts a SC Section 1890 Zone then 0 metres

(3) Minimum Exterior Side Yard Width

4.0

metres

(4) Minimum Rear Yard Depth: 7.5 metres

(5) Maximum Building Height 1 Storey

(6) "Minimum Rear Yard Landscape Strip: 7.8 metres

(7) Minimum Front Yard Landscape Strip:

4.0

metres

(8) Minimum Exterior Side Yard Landscape Strip:

4.0

metres

(9) All garbage and refuse containers shall be enclosed within a climate-controlled room within the

building.

II

II

(17)

4

(10) For the purposes of this zone,

th~

lot line, which

abuts Mayfield Road shall be deemed the Front Lot

I

Line..

,I

II

(11) For the proposes of this zone, any lot line, which

1\

abuts the Summer Valley Drive right-of-way shall

1\

be deemed the Exterior Side Lot Line.

II

II

II

(12) Drive-thru facilities for restauran,t uses shall not be

permitted.

I

(13) Drive-thru facilities shall not be located adjacent to

public roads or within 7.8 metres of a residential

zone.

(14) For the purposes of this zone, taverns are not

permitted.

(15)

The holding (H) symbol shall not; be removed until

the City of Brampton has confirmed that Block 196

on 43M-1276 has been merged on title with the

remaining portion of the SC(H) - Section 1891

zone.

(16) Until the holding (H) symbol is removed, the lands

designated SC (H) - SECTION 1891, shall only be

used for those purposes permitted in the

I

Agricultural (A) Zone as set out in Section 46.1.1,

II

subject to the requirements and restrictions of the

!I

Agricultural (A) zone, and all the general provisions

Ii

of this by-law.

,

I

1891.3

shall also be subject to the requirements and restrictions of

II

'I

the SC zone and all the general provisions of this by-law,

II

which are not in conflict with the ones setout in section

1891.2.

II

11

1891.4

upon removal of the holding (H) symbol for the lands

II

h

designated SC (H) -SECTION 1891, notwithstanding any

II II

II

other provision of this Zoning By-law, to the contrary, the

IIl/

lands zoned ServiCe Commercial Holding Section 1891 (SC

'I

!l

)1

(H) Section 1891) and the lands zoned Service Commercial

ii

d

"

Section 1890 (SC Section 1890), save and except the part of

Ii

Ii

Mayfield Road, shall be treated as a single lot for zoning

n

I'

purposes.

i

l

,! It Ii II

Ii

READ a FIRST, SECOND and THIRD TIME and PASSED in OPEN COUNCIL,

11

this

2,+t\

day of

Sept.traWf1l

2005::

II

,

!I

I;

!i

I

..

, i! ,I

Ii

'!

L

,.

'1 iI

II

II

11

.,

" " "

ii

:.

n

(18)

- - -. ~ - - \1

5

\

~1

II

It

I'

J

1\ I! 'I

II

!I Ii

II

\I

Ii

'I

II

.

I

Approved as to Ctmtent:

I H

I

\ APPROVEo AS TO FORM LAW DEPt BRAMPTON \d\.'1..c

OAnilisl"·'J2.1

,I

Ii

Adrian Smith,

MeIP,

RPP

Director of Planning and Land Development Services

Ii

Ii

11

II

II

.1 II Ii

II

II

[I

II

II

!I

"

II

II " II 11

II

;I i1

II

I' il II )1 I I

II

I' Ii :1

I!

'I I, II

n

" F H J)

Ij

I)

ii

II I~ II it

"

II :1 " I' I!

n

I' ;1 11 Ii II 'i li II l! 11

n

p l' .:; I, " ;1 i! ;; " !t " II " )~ 1, U II ;; 1I ji ii ,j :t ;'. 11 'I i( 'I 'I ) /i I,

II

if"

II

q

'I

!

I

I

,I

(19)

References

Related documents

traces. We define the complexity as the ratio of the execution time of a job to the execution time of a standard job, running on the same amount of data in the same environment. Here

11(4) Where the Chief Operating Officer has determined that a dog impounded under this section should neither be designated as dangerous under section 13 (Dangerous dog

Mackey brings the center a laparoscopic approach to liver and pancreas surgery not available at most area hospitals.. JOSHUA FORMAN, MD

Visual symptoms analysis showed correlation of double vision with total coma and with horizontal coma for the 5-mm and 7-mm pupil size; correlation between starburst and total coma

First divorce is a civil law decree from the state whereas an annulment is a canon law decree from the Church The Episcopal Church has been moving toward.. This is a scary and

The Coropany covenants, promises and agrees to inderonify and save harmless the City from and against any and all claims for damages and from all liability,

Insurers often use the following characteristics in pricing: o Motor vehicle record (driver safety record).. o

The biggest problem with automation of enterprise-wide IT processes lies in identifying and displaying dependencies: for instance, a backup solution that can only begin once