Indian Electricity Sector
Indian Electricity Sector
Reforms
Reforms
By By D.N.Raina D.N.RainaCEO, Entecsol international
CEO, Entecsol international
Dushanbe April 23,
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
Development of Electricity Market in IndiaDevelopment of Electricity Market in India
Major LegislationsMajor Legislations
Need for reformsNeed for reforms
Key reform InitiativesKey reform Initiatives
Structure of Indian Power MarketStructure of Indian Power Market
Current ScenarioCurrent Scenario
Electricity Market in India
Electricity Market in India
November 10, 1897:
November 10, 1897:
Sidrapong
Sidrapong
600 KW (3x200KW)
600 KW (3x200KW)
the first major HEP in Darjeeling commissioned
the first major HEP in Darjeeling commissioned
Installed capacity reached 1574 MW in 1947, the year
Installed capacity reached 1574 MW in 1947, the year
of Indian independence
of Indian independence
Power generation and supply remained an individual
Power generation and supply remained an individual
initiative till 1910
Major legislations
Major legislations
Indian Electricity Act 1910 Indian Electricity Act 1910 -- first step to regulate electricity first step to regulate electricity
business in the country
business in the country
Private power utilities: CESC, AEC, Surat Electricity Company, TPrivate power utilities: CESC, AEC, Surat Electricity Company, Tata ata
Power emerged after the introduction of Indian Electricity Act 1
Power emerged after the introduction of Indian Electricity Act 1910910
Power Departments in the State governments managed the Power Departments in the State governments managed the
electricity business
electricity business
Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 laid the foundation for the Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 laid the foundation for the
aggregation of small electricity utilities in to SEBs
aggregation of small electricity utilities in to SEBs
Electricity business nationalized (but Major private licensees Electricity business nationalized (but Major private licensees
retained distribution of electricity in urban areas)
retained distribution of electricity in urban areas)
Electricity is a concurrent subject under the Constitution (BothElectricity is a concurrent subject under the Constitution (Both
Central and State governments legislate on electricity matters)
Electricity Supply Act 1948
Electricity Supply Act 1948
ES Act 1948 encouraged running of electricity business on ES Act 1948 encouraged running of electricity business on
commercial principles
commercial principles
SEBs were set up in most of the states baring a few small ones SEBs were set up in most of the states baring a few small ones
Initially all investment requirements were met by governments Initially all investment requirements were met by governments
through budgetary support
through budgetary support
Resource constraints at State level lead to setting up of CentraResource constraints at State level lead to setting up of Central l
Power utilities (BBMB, DVC, NTPC, NHPC, REC, NEPCO, NPC, etc.,)
Power utilities (BBMB, DVC, NTPC, NHPC, REC, NEPCO, NPC, etc.,)
SEBs initially performed well but performance deteriorated in SEBs initially performed well but performance deteriorated in
subsequent years hence unable to meet the demand
Need for Reform
Need for Reform
SEBs earned negative returns against statutory requirement
SEBs earned negative returns against statutory requirement
of 3 % ROR on Net Fixed Assets as per ESA 1948
of 3 % ROR on Net Fixed Assets as per ESA 1948
Irrational tariff lead to large gap in average cost of supply
Irrational tariff lead to large gap in average cost of supply
and average tariff
and average tariff
Large subsidy requirements resulted in State governments
Large subsidy requirements resulted in State governments
defaulting in subsidy payments
defaulting in subsidy payments
Unsatisfactory Capital structure with poor financial
Unsatisfactory Capital structure with poor financial
management worsened the situation
management worsened the situation
Poor operational performance lead to high T&D Losses and
Poor operational performance lead to high T&D Losses and
loss of revenue
loss of revenue
Highly subsidized tariff to domestic consumers and
Highly subsidized tariff to domestic consumers and
agriculture sector (in some cases free power to agriculture)
agriculture sector (in some cases free power to agriculture)
………
Need for Reform
Need for Reform
Heavily debt oriented capital structure resulted in sharp increaHeavily debt oriented capital structure resulted in sharp increase in se in
the cost of interest payments in the total cost of supply
the cost of interest payments in the total cost of supply
Lack of funds resulted in poor maintenance of the power systemsLack of funds resulted in poor maintenance of the power systems
As a result PLF and availability declined sharpAs a result PLF and availability declined sharp
Non availability of finances delayed project execution and resulNon availability of finances delayed project execution and resulted ted
in time and cost overruns
in time and cost overruns
Receivables rose to high levels resulting in SEBs defaulting in Receivables rose to high levels resulting in SEBs defaulting in
payments to CPSUs, Coal utilities
payments to CPSUs, Coal utilities
Frequency of tariff revisions became very lowFrequency of tariff revisions became very low
Transmission and distribution losses exceeded 50% in several Transmission and distribution losses exceeded 50% in several
states
Key Reform Initiatives Over Past Decades
Key Reform Initiatives Over Past Decades
Private Power Initiative of GOI opened power
Private Power Initiative of GOI opened power
generation to private sector in March 1991
generation to private sector in March 1991
The CERC Act of 1998 laid the basis for creation of an
The CERC Act of 1998 laid the basis for creation of an
independent regulatory regime in the country
independent regulatory regime in the country
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission at the
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission at the
national level and SERCs in several states were created
national level and SERCs in several states were created
Unbundling of the SEBs initiated through Sate
Unbundling of the SEBs initiated through Sate
legislations
legislations
Transmission segment opened to private participation
Transmission segment opened to private participation
in 1998
in 1998
…………
Key Reform Initiatives Over Past Decade
Key Reform Initiatives Over Past Decade
Open Access on transmission systems provided forOpen Access on transmission systems provided for
Comprehensive Reform Act covering all the major aspect of Comprehensive Reform Act covering all the major aspect of
electricity business passed under the name
electricity business passed under the name -- Electricity Act 2003Electricity Act 2003
Hydropower Initiative to exploit 50,000 MW potential initiatedHydropower Initiative to exploit 50,000 MW potential initiated
Ultra Mega Power Projects Policy initiated recentlyUltra Mega Power Projects Policy initiated recently
GOI encouraged states to reform power sector with liberal GOI encouraged states to reform power sector with liberal
incentives under the APDRP and other centrally sponsored
incentives under the APDRP and other centrally sponsored
schemes
schemes
Fiscal incentives through tax concessions/slashing of dutiesFiscal incentives through tax concessions/slashing of duties
Objective of Reform Initiatives
Objective of Reform Initiatives
Downsize utilities to manageable levels to enhance efficiencyDownsize utilities to manageable levels to enhance efficiency
Increase availability through private sector participationIncrease availability through private sector participation
Bring competition through multiplicity of playersBring competition through multiplicity of players
Independent regulation to ensure fair play Independent regulation to ensure fair play
Remove transmission bottlenecks by facilitating open access Remove transmission bottlenecks by facilitating open access
Encourage power trading in the country Encourage power trading in the country
Structure of Indian Power Market
Structure of Indian Power Market
Govt. of India MOP Central Electricity Authority Central Public Sector Undertakings Training Institutions Appellate Electricity Tribunal Central Electricity Regulatory Commission State Electricity Regulatory Commissions Private Sector IPPs Transmission Utilities Distribution Companies State Governments Power Department State Power Utilities Generation cos Transmission cos Distribution cos
Current Status
Current Status
Installed capacity: Installed capacity:
utilities : 141,080 MW ( as on 31.01.08)utilities : 141,080 MW ( as on 31.01.08)
Captive : + 60,000 MW (31.1. 2008)Captive : + 60,000 MW (31.1. 2008)
Overall generation touched 662.52 billion units (2006Overall generation touched 662.52 billion units (2006--07)07)
Overall PLF reached 77.7% (2007Overall PLF reached 77.7% (2007--08)08)
Energy shortages have gone up from 8.1% in 1997Energy shortages have gone up from 8.1% in 1997--98 to 9.6 % in 98 to 9.6 % in
2007
2007--0808
Peak shortage increased from 11.3% in 1997Peak shortage increased from 11.3% in 1997--98 to 15.2% in 98 to 15.2% in
2007
Demand Supply Scenario
Demand Supply Scenario
* up to January * up to January 2008 2008 9 54556 554248 60884 586.00 2007 2007--08*08* 9.6 66092 624495 690587 662.52 662.52 2006 2006--0707 8.4 8.4 52735 52735 578819 578819 631554 631554 617.5 617.5 2005 2005--0606 7.3 7.3 43258 43258 548115 548115 591373 591373 587.4 587.4 2004 2004--0505 7.1 7.1 39866 39866 519398 519398 559264 559264 558.3 558.3 2003 2003--0404 8.8 8.8 48093 48093 497890 497890 545983 545983 531.6 531.6 2002 2002--0303 7.5 7.5 39187 39187 483350 483350 522537 522537 515.2 515.2 2001 2001--0202 7.8 7.8 39816 39816 467400 467400 507216 507216 499.5 499.5 2000 2000--0101 Energy Energy Shortages Shortages (%) (%) Energy Energy Shortages Shortages (MU) (MU) Energy Energy Availability Availability (MU) (MU) Energy Energy Requirement Requirement (MU) (MU) Generation (Bu) Generation (Bu) Year Year