• No results found

Performance Study of High Rise Building with Diagrid System Under Dynamic Loading

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Performance Study of High Rise Building with Diagrid System Under Dynamic Loading"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2690

PERFORMANCE STUDY OF HIGH RISE BUILDING WITH DIAGRID

SYSTEM UNDER DYNAMIC LOADING

Dr.Gopisiddappa

1

, M.Divyashree

2

,Sindhuja G J

3

1,2

Associate Professor,Dept.of civil Engineering,PESCE,Mandya,Karnataka,India

3

M.Tech Student,Dept. of civil Engineering,PESCE,Mandya,Karnataka,India

---***---Abstract –

Construction of multi-storey building is rapidly

increasing throughout the world. The diagrid structural system has been widely used for recent tall buildings due to the structural efficiency and aesthetic potential provided by the unique geometric configuration of the system.Diagrid is system of triangulated beams,straight or curved, and horizontal rings that together make up a structural system for a skyscrapers.

Diagrid structure use a lesser amount of structural material in general than conventional structural systems composed of orthogonal members. The structural efficiency of the diagrid system makes the number of interior columns decrease,therefore allowing much flexibility on the plan design.In this journal the concept of diagrid structural system is studied by conducting literature review,then optimum configuration for buildings and optimum angle for diagrid is found out by comparing conventional building with diagrid building with same plan area using ETABS software.

Key Words:Diagrids,Storey Displacement,Inter Storey Drift,Design Base Shear.

1.INTRODUCTION

Tall building or high rise structures construction are more in this era, due to increase in population, economic prosperity and also due to the scarcity of lands high rise structures or tall buildings are recommended. Height is main criteria in this kind of buildings, demand for tall buildings has increased because of increase in demand for business and residential space, advances in constructions, high strength structural elements, materials and also various software like ETABS, Staadpro, etc these are analysis and design softwares have provided development of high rise structures.

In 19th century tall buildings were built in U.S.A but now a days due to people needs tall buildings are constructing every where this leads to sustainable development of society that is “ development that meet meets the expectations and needs of present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their requirements”. Accoeding to studied and published articles in 1980, most of tall buildings were located in America and now recent studies shows that number of tall building and construction process is more in Asian countries, it is of about 32% and 24% in north America and Europe. Generally tall buildings are constructed and used for commercial office buildings, apartments etc.

1.1 OPTIMAL ANGLE

As in the diagrids, diagonals carry both shear and moment.Thus, the angle of diagonals is highly dependent upon the building height.Since the optimal angle of the columns for maximum bending rigidity is 90 degrees and that of the diagonals for maximum shear rigidity is about 35 degrees, it is expected that the optimal angle of diagonal members for diagrid structures will fall between these angles and the building height increases, the optimal angle also increases. Usually adopted range is 60-70 degree.

1.2 OBJECTIVE OF STUDY

Aimed to study the behaviour of tall building without any lateral load resisting system

To examine response of high rise building with diagrid system

An attempt is made to study response of buildings under dynamic loadings( i.e wind and earthquake load)

Diagrid systems are analysed for different angle of an external bracings

Storey shear of all the modals are compared

Storey drift and displacement of all the structures are plotted and results are compared to know responses of these buildings.

2.MODEL GEOMETRY

The details of models are given as follows

 Plan dimention-30m*30m

 Number of stories-30

 Floor to floor height-3m

 Number of bays in X-direction-6

 Number of bays in Y-directio

 Depth of slab-120mm

 Beam and column dimentions B1-250mm*450mm

(2)

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395 -0056

Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

[image:2.595.40.540.167.756.2]

© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2691 Fig -1: Plan of the linear building

Fig -2: Building 3D view of linear system

Chart-1:Maximum storey displacement for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

Chart-2:Maximum storey drift for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

3. ANALYSIS OF DIAGRID SYSTEM

The details of models are given as follows

 Plan dimention-30m*30m

 Number of stories-30

 Floor to floor height-3m

 Number of bays in X-direction-6

 Number of bays in Y-directio

 Depth of slab-120mm

 Floor diaphragm is assumed as rigid

 Beam and column dimentions B1-250mm*450mm

B2-300mm*600mm C1-900mm*900mm D1-450mm*450mm

[image:2.595.107.189.304.537.2]
(3)
[image:3.595.42.562.25.749.2] [image:3.595.53.257.102.328.2]

© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2692

Fig -4:Building 3D view and elevation view of diagrid system with diagonal angle 45 degree

Chart-3:Maximum storey displacement for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

Chart-4:Maximum storey drift for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

Fig -4:Building 3D view and elevation view of diagrid system with diagonal angle 63 degree

Chart-5:Maximum storey displacement for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

(4)

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395 -0056

Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

[image:4.595.48.253.111.340.2]

© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2693

Fig -5:Building 3D view and elevation view of diagrid system with diagonal angle 73 degree

Chart-7:Maximum storey displacement for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

[image:4.595.341.527.111.329.2]

Chart-8:Maximum storey drift for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

Fig -6:Building 3D view and elevation view of diagrid system with diagonal angle 75 degree

Chart-9:Maximum storey displacement for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

(5)
[image:5.595.61.556.47.727.2]

© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2694

Fig -7:Building 3D view and elevation view of diagrid system with diagonal angle 73 degree

Chart-10:Maximum storey displacement for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

[image:5.595.52.557.547.717.2]

Chart-11:Maximum storey drift for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

Fig -8:Building 3D view and elevation view of diagrid system with diagonal angle 73 degree

Chart-12:Maximum storey displacement for wind, earthquake and responses spectrum cases

(6)

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395 -0056

Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2695

4. CONCLUSIONS

The present work consists of analysis of 30 storey linear building and analysis of diagrid systems with different diagonal angles that is 45 degree, 63 degree, 73 degree, 75 degree, 78 degree, 81 degree. The comparison between linear building and diagrid building is carried out. ETABS software is used for modeling and analysis of structure. Analysis results like storey displacement,interstorey drift are presented here.Following are the conclusions inferred from the study.

 Framing building without any load resisting system shows highest drift and displacement value as compared to diagrid system

 Top storey displacement is less for diagrid system with diagonal angle 63 dgeree

 Between the region 63 degree to 75 degree (diagonal angle) diagrid system posses better stiffness, storey drift and storey displacement are less in this region.

REFERENCES

[1] Barry Charnish and Terry Mc Donnel “ the Bow Unique

Diagrid Structural Systems For Sustainable Tall Buildings”,2009

[2] Giulia milana, franco bontempi,pierluigi

olmati,konstantinos gkoumas “Ultimate Capacity Of Diagrid Systems For a Tall Buildings in Nominal Configuration and Damaged State”, Feb 2015

[3] J.Kim, Y. Jum and Y-Ho Lee “Seismic Performance

Evaluation Of Diagrid Systems Buildings”, June 2010

[4] Johan Leonard “Investigation Of Shear-lag Effect In High

–Rise Buildings With Diagrid Systems”, 2005

[5] Khushbu Jania, Paresh V. Patelb “Analysis And Design Of

Diagrid structural system for High Rise Steel Buildings”,Jan 2013

[6] Kyoung sun moon “Structural Design and Construction

Of Complex Shaped Tall Buildings”, 2008

[7] Kyoung –Sun Moon, John E.Fernandez and Jerome J.

Connor “ Diagrid Structural Systems For Tall Buildings : Characteristics and Methodology For Preliminary Design”,2007

[8] Lekshmi Mohan, C.K.Prasad Varma Thampan “

Numerical Moddelling and Evaluation Of Hybrid Diagrid Structures”,June 2015

[9] Mr.Devaraj R,Rajalaxmi M Megadi “Analysis Of Curved

Perimeter Diagrid lateral Systems”, June 2014

[10] Nishith B.Panchal, Dr.V.R Patel, Dr.I.I.Pandy “Optimum

angle of diagrid Strucutural System”, June 2014

[11] Nitish B.Panchal, Dr.V.R. Patel “Diagrid Structural

Systems :Stratergies To Reduce Lateral Forces On high Rise Building “, April 2014

BIOGRAPHIES

Sindhuja.G.J a Mtech student of P.E.S college of Engineering, Mandya,Karnataka, Specilization in in CAD-Structures.

st

Author

Figure

Fig -2: Building 3D view of linear system
Fig -4:Building 3D view and elevation view of diagrid system with diagonal angle 45 degree
Fig -5:Building 3D view and elevation view of diagrid system with diagonal angle 73 degree
Fig -7:Building 3D view and elevation view of diagrid system with diagonal angle 73 degree

References

Related documents

Flow cytometric analysis of the effect of European genotype PRRSV entry on PAM phagocytosis and confocal microscopical analysis of the number of internalized PRRSV virions per PAM

Therefore, many efforts have been devoted to solve most optimal Job Shop Scheduling Problems (JSSP), as most of the researches aimed at minimizing the maximum completion time. JSSP

diagnosis of heart disease in children. : The role of the pulmonary vascular. bed in congenital heart disease.. natal structural changes in intrapulmon- ary arteries and arterioles.

Background: Councils of Chiropractic Education (CCE) indirectly influence patient care and safety through their role of ensuring the standards of training delivered by

AIRWAYS ICPs: integrated care pathways for airway diseases; ARIA: Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DG: Directorate General;

It was decided that with the presence of such significant red flag signs that she should undergo advanced imaging, in this case an MRI, that revealed an underlying malignancy, which

The simulations with a random distribution of particles suggest that it may be possible to reduce or even suppress overall serrations in the effective behaviour of strain ageing

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and the Elderly: Knowledge, Experience and Usage Barriers..