• No results found

The maximal and minimal ranks of matrix expression with applications

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "The maximal and minimal ranks of matrix expression with applications"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

The maximal and minimal ranks of matrix

expression with applications

Zhiping Xiong, Yingying Qin

*

and Shifang Yuan

* Correspondence: qinyy04@163. com

Department of Mathematics, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, P.R. China

Abstract

We give in this article the maximal and minimal ranks of the matrix expression A-B1V1C1-B2V2C2-B3V3C3-B4V4C4with respect toV1,V2, V3, andV4. As applications, we

derive the extremal ranks of the generalized Schur complementA - BM(1)C - DN(1)G

and the partial matrix (A BM(1)C DN(1)G) with respect to the generalized inverseM(1) ε M{1} andN(1)ÎN{1}.

AMS classifications:15A03; 15A09; 15A24.

Keywords:matrix expression, maximal rank, minimal rank, generalized inverse, rank equality

1 Introduction

LetCm × nbe the set of allm × ncomplex matrices with complex entries.Indenotes the identity matrix of ordernandOm × ndenotes them×nmatrix of all zero entries (if no confusion occurs, we will omit the subscript). For a given a matrix AÎ Cm× n,

the symbolsA* and r(A) will stand for the conjugate transpose and the rank of the

matrixA, respectively. We recall that a generalized inverse X ÎCn× mofAÎCm × n is a matrix which satisfies some of the following four Penrose equations [1]:

(1)AXA=A, (2)XAX=X, (3) (AX)∗=AX, (4) (XA)∗ =XA.

For a subset {i,j,...,k} of the set {1,2,3,4}, the set ofn × mmatrices satisfying the equa-tions (i), (j), ...,(k) from among the above four Penrose Equations (1)-(4) is denoted by A{i,j,...,k}. A matrixX fromA{i,j,...,k} is called an {i,j,...,k}-inverse ofAand is denoted by A(i,j,...,k)

. In particular, an n × mmatrix X of the setA{1} is called a g-inverse ofAand denoted byA(1). The unique {1, 2, 3, 4}-inverse of Ais denoted byA†, which is called

the Moore-Penrose inverse ofA. Throughout this article, the abbreviated symbolsEA

andFAstand for the two projectorsEA= I - AA†andFA = I−A†AofA, respectively. We refer the reader to [2,3] for basic results on the generalized inverses.

Given a matrix with some variant entries in it (often called partial matrix) or a matrix expression with some variant matrices in it, the rank of the partial matrix or matrix expression will vary with respect to the variant entries or variant matrices. Because the rank of matrix is an integer between 0 and the minimal of row and col-umn numbers of the matrix, maximal and minimal ranks of partial matrix or matrix expressions must exist with respect to their variant entries or variant matrices. Many problems in matrix theory and applications are closely related to maximal and minimal

(2)

possible ranks of matrix expressions with variant entries. For example, a matrix equa-tion AXB = Cis consistent if and only if the minimal rank ofC-AXBwith respect toX is zero, see [4-6]; there is matrixX such that the partial matrixAXBof ordernis non-singular if and only if the maximal rank ofAXBwith respect toX isn, see [7-11].

The maximal and minimal ranks of matrix expressions or partial matrix are two basic concepts in matrix theory for describing the dimension of the row or column vector space of matrix expressions or partial matrix, both of which are well understood and are easy to compute by the well-known elementary or congruent matrix opera-tions, see [5,7,8,10-16]. These two quantities play an essential role in characterizing algebraic properties of matrices expressions or partial matrices. In fact, maximal and minimal ranks of matrix expressions or partial matrices have been the main objects of study in matrix theory and applications. Some previous systematical researches on maximal and minimal ranks of matrix expressions or partial matrices and their applica-tions can be found in [17-20]. In recent years, the present author reconsidered the maximal and minimal ranks of matrix expressions or partial matrices by using some tricky operations on block matrices and generalized inverses of matrices, and obtained many new formulas for maximal and minimal ranks of matrix expressions or partial matrices and their applications, see [4,6,9,21-28].

In this article, given matrices ACm×n, B

iCm×pi, CiCqi×n, i= 1, 2, 3, 4, we will

present the maximal and minimal ranks of the matrix expressionA-B1V1C1- B2V2C2

-B3V3C3 - B4V4C4with respect to V1,V2,V3, andV4. As applications, the maximal and minimal ranks of the generalized Schur complementA - BM(1)C - DN(1)Gand the par-tial matrix (A BM(1)C DN(1)G) with respect to the generalized inverseM(1)Î M{1} and N(1)ÎN

{1} are also considered. The results in this article extend the earlier studies by various authors, see, e.g., [4-6,11,16,18,21,25,26].

We first introduce some well-known results which will be used in this article. Lemma 1.1[5,8,25]. Let

M= ⎛

AA1121AA1222AX23

Y A32A33

⎞ ⎠

where AijCmi×nj(1≤i, j≤3) are given, XCmn3 and YCmn1 are two var-iant matrices. Then

max

X,Y r(M) = min

m3+n3+r

A11A12

A21A22

, m1+n1+r

A22A23

A32A33

,

m1+m3+r(A21A22A23), n1+n3+r

⎛ ⎝AA1222

A32

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

(1)

minr

X,Y (M) =r(A21 A22A23) +r ⎛ ⎝AA1222

A32

⎞ ⎠+ max

r

A11A12

A21A22

r

A12

A22

r(A21A22),

r

A22A23

A32A33

r

A22

A32

r(A22A23)

.

(2)

(3)

A(1)=A†+ (InAA)W+Z(ImAA†), (3)

whereWÎCn × mandZÎ Cn×mare arbitrary.

Lemma 1.3[9]. Let AÎ Cm × n,BÎ Cm × k, andCÎCl × n. Then

(1).r(A B) =r(A) +r(EAB) =r(EBA) +r(B),

(2).r

A C

=r(A) +r(CFA) =r(AFC) +r(C),

whereEA =Im-AA†andFA=In-A†A.

2 The maximal and minimal ranks of A - B1V1C1 -B2V2C2 - B3V3C3 - B4V4C4 In this section, we will present the maximal and minimal ranks of the linear matrix expression

P(V1,V2,V3,V4) =AB1V1C1−B2V2C2−B3V3C3−B4V4C4, (4)

where ACm×n, B

iCm×pi, CiCqi×n, i= 1, 2, 3, 4, are given matrices, with

respect to four variant matrices ViCpi×qi, i= 1, 2, 3, 4. Applying the formula (1) in

Lemma 1.1 to the linear matrix expression in (4) and simplifying, we obtain the follow-ing result.

Theorem 2.1Let P(V1,V2,V3,V4) be given as (4). Then

max

V1,V2,V3,V4

r(P(V1, V2, V3, V4)) = min{T1,T2,T3,T4}, (5)

where

r(P(V1,V2,V3,V4)) =r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O O O O O O O IP4−V4

O O O O C4 O O O Iq4

O O O O O IP2−V2 O O

O O O O C2 O Iq2 O O

O B3 O B1 A B2 O B4 O

O O Iq1 O C1 O O O O

O OV1IP1 O O O O O

Iq3 O O O C3 O O O O

V3IP3 O O O O O O O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠

4

i=1

pi

4

i=1

qi,

=r(T)−

4

i=1

pi

4

i=1

qi,

Proof. It is easy to verify by block Gaussian elimination that the rank ofP(V1,V2,V3, V4) in (4) can be expressed as

r(P(V1,V2,V3,V4)) =r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O O O O O O O IP4−V4

O O O O C4 O O O Iq4

O O O O O IP2−V2 O O

O O O O C2 O Iq2 O O

O B3 O B1 A B2 O B4 O

O O Iq1 O C1 O O O O

O O −V1IP1 O O O O O

Iq3 O O O C3 O O O O

−V3IP3 O O O O O O O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠

4

i=1

pi

4

i=1

qi,

=r(T)−

4

i=1

pi

4

i=1

(4)

where ACm×n, B

iCm×pi, CiCqi×n, ViCpi×qi, i= 1, 2, 3, 4 and Ipi,Iqi,i= 1, 2, 3, 4, are denotes the identity matrix of orderpiand qi, respectively.

T= ⎛

EO E1 S E2−V34

V3E4 O

⎞ ⎠,S=

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O O O C4 O O O

O O O O Ip2−V2 O O O O C2 O Iq2 O B3 O B1 A B2 O B4

O Iq1 O C1 O O O OV1Ip1 O O O O

O O O C3 O O O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠

and

E1= (O O O O O O Iq3)∗, E2= (O O O O O O Ip4), E3= (Iq4O O O O O O)∗, E4= (Ip3O O O O O O). According to this result, we have

max

V1,V2,V3,V4

r(P(V1,V2,V3,V4)) = max

V1,V2,V3,V4 r(T)−

4

i=1

pi

4

i=1

qi. (6)

Then applying the formula (1) in Lemma 1.1 to matrix T, we have

max

V3,V4

r(T) = min

p3+q4+r

O E2

E1 S

p4+q3+r

S E3

E4 O

,

p4+p3+r(E1S E2), q3+q4+r

⎛ ⎝ES2

E4

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭

= minp3+q4+p4+q3+r(S1), p4+q3+q4+p3+r(S2),

p4+p3+q4+q3+r(S3), q3+q4+p4+p3+r(S4)

,

where

S1=

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O O O O IP2−V2 O O O C4 O O

O O O C2 O Iq2 O B3B1 A B2 O

Iq1 O O C1 O O

V1 O Ip1 O O O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠

, S2=

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O O O IP2 OV2 O O C2 O O Iq2 O B1 A B2B4 O

Iq1 O C1 O O O O O C3 O O O

V1Ip1 O O O O ⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠

S3

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O O O O IP2 OV2 O O O C2 O O Iq2 O B3B1 A B2B4 O

Iq1 O O C1 O O O

V1 O Ip1 O O O O ⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠, S4=

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O O O IP2−V2 O O C4 O O

O O C2 O Iq2 O B1 A B2 O

Iq1 O C1 O O O O C3 O O

V1Ip1 O O O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠

Again applying the formula (1) in Lemma 1.1, we get

max

V1,V2,V3,V4

r(T) = min

p3+q4+p4+q3+ max

V1,V2

r(S1),p4+q3+q4+p3+ max

V1,V2

r(S2) ,

p4+p3+q4+q3+ max

V1,V2

r(S3),q3+q4+p4+p3+ max

V1,V2

r(S4)

(5)

and

max V1,V2

r(S1) = min

⎧ ⎨

p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎝O O CO O C42

B3B1 A

⎠,p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎝BO C3 A B4 O2

O C1 O

⎞ ⎠,

p1+q2+q1+p2+r

O O C4O

B3B1 A B2

,p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O C4

O C2

B3 A

O C1

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ ⎭,

(8)

max V1,V2

r(S2) = min

⎧ ⎨

p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎝BO C1 A B2O4

O C3O

⎠,p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎝CA B1O O2B4

C3O O

⎞ ⎠,

p1+q2+q1+p2+r

B1 A B2B4

O C3O O

,p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

C2O

A B4

C1O

C3O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ ⎭,

(9)

max

V1,V2

r(S3) = min

p1+q2+q1+p2+r

O O C2 O

B3B1 A B4

,

p1+q2+q1+p2+r

B3 A B2B4

O C1 O O

,

p1+q2+q1+p2+r(B3B1A B2B4),

p1+q2+q1+p2+r

BO C3 A B2 O4

O C1 O

⎞ ⎠,

(10)

max

V1,V2

r(S4) = min

⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩

p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O C4

O C2

B1 A

O C3

⎞ ⎟ ⎟

⎠,p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

C4 O

A B2

C1 O

C3 O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠,

p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎝BO C1 A B4 O2

O C3 O

⎠,p1+q2+q1+p2+r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

C4

C2

A C1

C3

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠.

(11)

Substituting (8)-(11) into (7) and (6) yield (5).

Recall a simple fact that a matrix equation AXB = Cis consistent for every variant

matrices X, if and only if the maximal rank of C - AXBwith respect to X is zero.

Thus, by Theorem 2.1 we can immediately obtain the following result.

Corollary 2.2 LetP(V1,V2,V3, V4) be given as (4). Then the matrix equation A = B1V1C1 + B2V2C2 + B3V3C3 + B4V4C4 holds for anyV1, V2,V3, andV4 if and only if T1= OorT2=OorT3 =OorT4=O.

Because the right side of (5) are just composed by ranks of block matrices, they can be easily simplified by block Gaussian elimination when the given matrices in (4) satisfy some restrictions.

Theorem 2.3 LetP(V1,V2,V3,V4) be given as (4) and letR(B1)⊆R(B2),R(B3)⊆R (B4), R(B1)⊆R(B2),R(B3)⊆R(B4),R(C∗2)⊆R(C∗1),R(C∗4)⊆R(C∗3) Then

max

V1,V2,V3,V4

(6)

where

τ1= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

O O CO O C42

B3B1 A

⎞ ⎠, r

O C4 O

B3 A B2

, r

⎛ ⎝BO C3 A4

O C1

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

τ2= min

r

O C2 O

B1 A B4

, r(A B2B4), r

A B4

C1 O

,

τ3= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

⎛ ⎝BO C1 A2

O C3

⎞ ⎠, r

A B2

C3 O

, r

⎛ ⎝CA1

C3 ⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭.

Proof. In fact, we can write B1=B2X,B3=B4Y,C2=ZC1, andC4= WC3under the hypotheses of Theorem 2.3. In this case, we have

r

O O C4 O

B3B1 A B2

=r

O C4 O

B3 A B2

, r ⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O C4

O C2

B3 A

O C1

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠=r

⎛ ⎝BO C3 A4

O C1

⎞ ⎠,

r

O O OO O C2

B3B1 A

⎞ ⎠=r

O OO O ZCC41

B3B2X A

⎞ ⎠r

BO C3 A B4 O2

O C1 O

⎞ ⎠ (13) and r

B1 A B2B4

O C3 O O

=r

A B2B4

C3 O O

, r ⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

C2 O

A B4

C1 O

C3 O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠=r

⎛ ⎝CA B1 O4

C3 O

⎞ ⎠,

r

BO C1 A B2 O4

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠=r

BO ZC2X A B1 O4

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠r

CA B1 O O2B4

C3 O O

⎞ ⎠

(14)

and

r(B3B1A B2B4) =r(A B2B4) =r

BO C3 A B2 O4

O C1 O

⎞ ⎠=r

A B4

C1 O

,

r

O O C2 O

B3B1 A B4

=r

O O ZC1 O

B3B2X A B4

r

B3 A B2B4

O C1 O O

,

r

O O C2 O

B3B1 A B4

=r

O C2 O

B1 A B4

(15)

and

r

BO C1 A B4 O2

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠=r

A B2

C3 O

,r ⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ C4 C2 A C1 C3 ⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠=r

⎛ ⎝CA1

C3

⎞ ⎠,r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O C4

O C2

B1 A

O C3

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠=r

⎛ ⎝BO C1 A2

O C3

⎞ ⎠, r ⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O C4

O C2

B1 A

O C3

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠=r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O C4

O ZC1

B2X A

O C3

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠≤r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

C4 O

A B2

C1 O

C3 O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠

(7)

Combining (5) with (13)-(16) yields (12).

Corollary 2.4 Let P(V1, V2, V3, V4) be given as (4) and let

R(B1)⊆R(B2),R(B3)⊆R(B4),R(C∗2)⊆R(C∗1),R(C∗4)⊆R(C∗3) then the matrix

equa-tion A = B1V1C1+ B2V2C2+ B3V3C3 + B4V4C4 holds for anyV1,V2,V3, andV4 if and only ifτ1= Oorτ2 =Oorτ3=O.

In the rest of this section, we will find the minimal rank of the linear matrix

expres-sion P(V1,V2, V3, V4) in (4), with respect to four variant matrices

ViCpi×qi, i= 1, 2, 3, 4, whenP(V1,V2,V3,V4) satisfy some restrictions.

Theorem 2.5 Let P(V1, V2, V3, V4) be given as (4) and let

R(B1)⊆R(B2),R(B3)⊆R(B4),R(C∗2)⊆R(C∗1),R(C∗4)⊆R(C∗3). Then

min

V1,V2,V3,V4

r(P(V1,V2,V3,V4))

=r(A B2B4) +r

A B4

C1 O

+r

O C2 O

B1 A B4

+r

A B2

C3 O

+r

⎛ ⎝BO C1 A2

O C3

⎞ ⎠

+r ⎛ ⎝CA1

C3

⎞ ⎠r

B1 A B4

O C1 O

r

O C2 O

B2 A B4

r ⎛ ⎝BO C1 A1

O C3

⎞ ⎠r

⎛ ⎝CA B2 O2

C3 O

⎞ ⎠

+max ⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

O C4 O

B3 A B2

+r

⎛ ⎝BO C3 A4

O C1

⎞ ⎠+r

O O CO O C42

B3B1 A

⎞ ⎠r

O O CO O C41

B3B1 A

⎞ ⎠

r

O O CO O C42

B3B2 A

β1β2, r

A B2B4

C3 O O

+r

⎛ ⎝CA B1 O4

C3 O

⎞ ⎠

+r

BO C1 A B2 O4

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠r

BO C1 A B1 O4

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠r

CA B2 O O2B4

C3 O O

⎞ ⎠2β3

⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

(17)

where

β1= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

BO O C3B1 A2

O O C3

⎞ ⎠, r

B3 A B2

O C3 O

, r

⎛ ⎝BO C3 A1

O C3

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

β2= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

O CO C42 OO

B1 A B4

⎞ ⎠, r

C4 O O

A B2B4

, r

⎛ ⎝CA B4 O4

C1 O

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

β3= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

BO C1 A B2 O4

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠, r

A B2B4

C3 O O

, r

⎛ ⎝CA B1 O4

C3 O

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭.

Proof. From the proof of Theorem 2.1, it is easy to verify that the minimal rank ofP (V1, V2,V3,V4) in (4) can be expressed as

min

V1,V2,V3,V4

r(P(V1,V2,V3,V4)) = min

V1,V2,V3,V4 r(T)−

4

i=1

pi

4

i=1

qi, (18)

where T, S, Ei, piand qi, i = 1,2,3,4, are given as the proof of Theorem 2.1. Then

(8)

min

V1,V2,V3,V4

r(T) = min

V3,V4 r

EO E1 S E2−V34

V3E4 O

⎠=r(E1 S E3) +r

⎛ ⎝ES2

E4

⎞ ⎠

+ max

r

O E2

E1 S

r

E2

S

r(E1 S),

r

S E3

E4 O

r

S E4

r(S E3)

.

(19)

In this case, we derive from (19) that

min

V1,V2,V3,V4

r(T) = min

V1,V2

r(E1 S E3) + min

V1,V2 r

⎛ ⎝ES2

E4

⎞ ⎠

+ max

min

V1,V2 r

O E2

E1 S

−min

V1,V2 r

E2

S

−min

V1,V2

r(E1 S),

min

V1,V2 r

S E3

E4 O

−min

V1,V2 r

S E4

−min

V1,V2

r(S E3)

.

(20)

Again applying the formula (2) in Lemma 1.1, we have

min

V1,V2

r(E1 S E3) =q4+q3+ min

V1,V2 r(S3)

=

4

i=1

qi+p1+p2+r(B3 B1 A B2 B4) +r

BO C3 A B2 O4

O C1 O

⎞ ⎠

+ max ⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

O O C2 O

B3B1 A B4

r

BO O C3B1 A B2 O4

O O C1 O

⎞ ⎠r

O O C2 O O

B3B1 A B2B4

,

r

B3 A B2B4

O C1 O O

r

BO C3 A B2 O O2B4

O C1 O O

⎞ ⎠r

B3B1 A B2B4

O O C1 O O

⎭,

(21)

where S3is given as the Equation (7) of the proof of Theorem 2.1. Since B1 =B2X,

B3 =B4Y,C2=ZC1, and C4 =WC3, (21) is reduced to

min

V1,V2

r(E1S E3)

=

4

i=1

qi+p1+p2+r(A B2 B4) +r

A B4

C1 O

+ max

r

O C2 O

B1 A B4

r

B1 A B4

O C1 O

r

C2 O O

A B2B4

, −r

A B2B4

C1 O O

=

4

i=1

qi+p1+p2+r(A B2 B4) +r

A B4

C1 O

+r

O C2 O

B1 A B4

r

B1 A B4

O C1 O

r

C2 O O

A B2B4

.

(22)

(9)

r

O C2 O

B1 A B4

=r

O ZC1 O

B2X A B4

=r ⎛ ⎝Z O

O I

O C1 O

B2 A B4

⎛ ⎝O I OX O O

O O I ⎞ ⎠ ⎞ ⎠

r

Z O O I

O C1 O

B2 A B4

+r

O C1 O

B2 A B4

⎛ ⎝O I OX O O

O O I ⎞ ⎠ ⎞ ⎠

r

O C1 O

B2 A B4

=r

O C2 O

B2 A B4

+r

O C1 O

B1 A B4

r

O C1 O

B2 A B4

.

With the similar method, we also have

min

V1,V2 r

⎛ ⎝ES2

E4

⎞ ⎠=

4

i=1

pi+q1+q2+r

⎛ ⎝CA1

C3

⎞ ⎠+r

A B2

C3 O

+r

⎛ ⎝BO C1 A2

O C3

⎞ ⎠

r ⎛ ⎝BO C1 A1

O C3

⎞ ⎠r

⎛ ⎝CA B2 O2

C3 O

⎞ ⎠,

(23)

min

V1,V2 r

O E2

E1 S

=p1+p2+p4+q1+q2+q3+r

O C4 O

B3 A B2

+r

⎛ ⎝BO C3 A4

O C1

⎞ ⎠

+r

O O CO O C42

B3B1 A

⎞ ⎠r

O O CO O C41

B3B1 A

⎞ ⎠r

O O CO O C42

B3B2 A

⎞ ⎠,

(24)

min

V1,V2

r

S E3

E4 O

=q1+q2+q4+p1+p2+p3+r

A B2B4

C3 O O

+r

⎛ ⎝CA B1 O4

C3 O

⎞ ⎠

+r

⎛ ⎝O CB1A B2O4

O C3O

⎞ ⎠−r

⎛ ⎝BO C1 A B1 O4

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠−r

⎛ ⎝CA B2 O O2B4

C3 O O

⎞ ⎠.

(25)

On the other hand, by the formula (1) in Lemma 1.1, we have

min

V1,V2 r

E2

S

=p4+p1+p2+q1+q2+ min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

BO O C3B1 A2

O O C3

⎞ ⎠, r

BO C3 A B4 O2

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠,

r ⎛ ⎝BO C3 A1

O C3

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭.

(10)

max

V1,V2 r

S E4

=p3+p1+p2+q1+q2+ min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

BO C1 A B2 O4

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠,r

CA B4 O O2B4

C3 O O

⎞ ⎠,

r

⎛ ⎝CA B1 O4

C3 O

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

(27)

max

V1,V2

r(E1 S) =q3+p1+p2+q1+q2+ min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

O CO C42 OO

B1 A B4

⎞ ⎠,r

C4 O O

A B2B4

,

r

⎛ ⎝CA B4 O4

C1 O

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

(28)

max

V1,V2

r(S E3) =q3+p1+p2+q1+q2+ min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

BO C1 A B2 O4

O C3 O

⎞ ⎠,r

A B2B4

C3 O O

,

r

⎛ ⎝CA B1 O4

C3 O

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭.

(29)

Contrasting (18), (20) and (22)-(29) yields (17).

Corollary 2.6 LetP(V1, V2, V3,V4) be given as (4) and letR(B1)⊆R(B2), R(B3)⊆R (B4), R(B1)⊆R(B2),R(B3)⊆R(B4),R(C∗2)⊆R(C∗1),R(C∗4)⊆R(C∗3). Then the matrix

equation A = B1V1C1 +B2V2C2+ B3V3C3 +B4V4C4 is consistent if and only if the right

side of (17) is zero.

3 Some applications to generalized Schur complement and partial matrix

As direct applications of the results in Section 2, we determine in this section the

max-imal and minmax-imal ranks of the generalized Schur complement A-BM(1)C-DN(1)Gand

the partial matrix (A BM(1)C DN(1)G) with respect to two variant matricesM(1)ÎM{1} and N(1)ÎN{1}.

Theorem 3.1Let AÎ Cm × n,BÎCm × p,CÎCq × n, DÎCm × s, GÎCt × n,MÎ Cq × p, andNÎCt × s.

Then

max

M(1)M{1},N(1)N{1}r(ABM

(1)

CDN(1)G) = min{T1, T2, T3}, (30)

where

T1= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

⎛ ⎝A D BG N O

C O M

r(M)−r(N),r

A D B G N O

r(N), r

⎛ ⎝A DG N

C O

⎞ ⎠r(N)

⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

T2= min

A B D C M O

r(M),r(A B D),r

A D C O

,

T3= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

⎛ ⎝A BC M

G O

⎠−r(M), r

⎛ ⎝AC

G

⎞ ⎠, r

A B G O

(11)

Proof. Applying Lemma 1.2, we have

M(1)=M†+FMW1+W2EM (31)

and

N(1)=N†+FNW3+W4EN, (32)

where Wi,i = 1,2,3,4 are arbitrary,EM=Iq - MM†andFM=Ip- M†M. Substituting

the Equation (31) and Equation (32) into the generalized Schur complement A - BM(1)

C - DN(1)G yields

ABM(1)CDN(1)G=A1−BFMW1CBW2EMCDFNW3GDW4ENG, (33)

whereA1=A - BM†C - DN†G.

In fact A1 - BFMW1C - BW2EMC - DFNW3G - DW4ENGis a special case of the

matrix expressionP(V1,V2,V3,V4), andR(BFM)⊆R(B),R(DFN)⊆ R(D),R((EMC)*) ⊆R (C*),R((ENG)*)⊆R(G*). In this case, from the formula (12) in Theorem 2.3, we have

max

M(1)M{1},N(1)N{1}r(ABM

(1)CDN(1)G)

= max

W1,W2,W3,W4

r(A1−BFMW1CBW2EMCDFNW3GDW4ENG)

= min{T1,T2,T3},

(34)

where

T1 = min ⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

OO O EO ENMGC DFNBFM A1

⎞ ⎠r

O ENG O DFN A1 B

,r

DFO EN AN1G

O C

⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭

T2 = min

r

O EMC O BFMA1 D

, r(A1B B), r

A1D

C O

T3 = min ⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

BFO EM AM1C

O G

⎞ ⎠, r

A1B

G O

, r ⎛ ⎝AC1

G ⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭

ForT1′, simplifying the ranks of matrices by Lemma 1.3 and block Gaussian elimina-tion, we find that:

r

OO O EO EMNGC DFNBFM A1

⎞ ⎠=

EAM1G ODFNBFOM EMC O O

⎞ ⎠

=r ⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

A1D B O O O

O N O O O O O O M O O O G O O O N O C O O O O M

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟

⎠−2r(N)−2r(M)

=r ⎛ ⎝G N OA D B

C O M

r(N)−r(M),

(12)

r

O ENG O DFN A1 B

=r

A1 DFN B ENG O O

=r

AO N O O1D B O G O O N

2r(N)

=r

A D B G N O

r(N),

(36)

r

DFO EN AN1G

O C

⎞ ⎠=

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O G N O O C O M D A1O O

N O O O O C O O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟

⎠−2r(N) =r ⎛ ⎝A DG N

C O

r(N). (37)

Combining the rank equalities (35), (36) with (37), we have T1=T1.

By the similar approach, we also have T2 =T2 and T3 =T3. Then we have complete

the proof of theorem.

Corollary 3.2LetAÎCm × n,BÎCm × p,CÎCq × n,DÎCm × s,GÎ Ct × n,MÎ Cq × p, andNÎ Ct × s. Then the identityA = BM(1)C + DN(1)G

holds for everyM(1)Î M{1} and N(1)ÎN{1} if and only if T1=O or T2=O or T3=O.

From the proof of Theorem 3.1, we known that A - BM(1)C - DN(1)G = A1

-BFmW1C - BW2EmC - DFNW3G - DW4ENG, where A1 = A - BM†C - DN†G. In this case, A - BM(1)C - DN(1)Gis a special case of the matrix expressionP(V1,V2,V3,V4), and R(BFM)⊆R(B),R(DFN)⊆R(D),R((EMC)*)⊆R(C*),R((ENG)*)⊆R(G*). Then from the Theorem 2.5, we have

Theorem 3.3Let AÎ Cm × n,BÎCm × p,CÎCq × n, DÎCm × s, GÎCt × n,MÎ Cq × p, andNÎCt × s.

Then

min

M(1)M{1},N(1)N{1}r(ABM

(1)CDN(1)G)

= min

W1,W2,W3,W4

r(A1−BFMW1CBW2EMCDFNW3GDW4ENG)

=r(A B D) +r

A D C O

+r

M C O B A D

+r

⎛ ⎝AC

G ⎞ ⎠+r

A B G O

+r

⎛ ⎝M CB A

O G ⎞ ⎠

r ⎛ ⎝M O OB A D

O C O ⎞ ⎠r

O C O M B A D O

r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

B A M O O C O G

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠−r

⎛ ⎝C O MA B O

G O O ⎞ ⎠+ 3r(M)

+ max ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ r

N G O D A B

+r

⎛ ⎝O G NB A O

O C O ⎞ ⎠+r

⎛ ⎝N O GO M C

D B A ⎞ ⎠r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

N O G O O C D B A O M O

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠

r ⎛ ⎝N O G OO O C M

D B A O

⎠+r(N)−δ1−δ2,

r

A B D G O O

+r

⎛ ⎝A BC O

G O ⎞ ⎠+r

⎛ ⎝M C OB A D

O G O ⎞ ⎠−r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

B A D M O O O C O O G O ⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠

r ⎛ ⎝C O O MA B D O

G O O O ⎞ ⎠2δ3

⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

(13)

where

δ1= min

⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

O M C D B A N O O O O G

⎞ ⎟ ⎟

⎠−r(M), r ⎛ ⎝D A BN O O

O G O ⎞ ⎠, r

⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝

D A N O O C O G

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ,

δ2= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

M C O OO G O N B A D O

r(M), r

G O O N A B D O

, r

⎛ ⎝G O NA D O

C O O ⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭,

δ3= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

⎛ ⎝M C OB A D

O G O

⎠−r(M), r

A B D G O O

, r ⎛ ⎝A DC O

G O ⎞ ⎠ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭.

Corollary 3.4LetAÎCm × n,BÎCm × p,CÎCq × n,DÎCm × s,GÎ Ct × n,MÎ Cq × p, and NÎCt × s. then the identityA=BM(1)C

+DN(1)Gis consistent if and only if the right side of (38) is zero.

Next, we will determine the maximal and minimal ranks of the partial matrix

(A BM(1)C DN(1)G)

with respect toM(1)Î M{1} andN(1)Î N{1}, by applying the results in Section 2. It is quite obvious that the partial matrix (A BM(1)C DN(1)G) may be written as

(A BM(1)C DN(1)G) = (A O O) +BM(1)(O C O) +DN(1)(O O G). (39)

Then from (39) and Theorems 2.3 and 3.1, we have

Theorem 3.5 LetAÎ Cm × n,BÎCm × p,CÎ Cq × n,DÎCm × s, GÎ Ct × n,MÎ Cq × p, andNÎCt × s.

Then

max

M(1)M{1},N(1)N{1}r(A BM

(1)C DN(1)G) = minT˜

1, T˜2, T˜3

, (40)

where

˜

T1= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

A O O D BO O G N O O C O O M

r(M)−r(N), r

A O D B O G N O

r(N),

r

A O D O G N

+r(C)−r(N)

,

˜

T2= min

r

A O B D O C M O

r(M), r(A B D), r(A D) +r(C)

,

˜

T3= min

r

A O B O C M

+r(G)−r(M), r(A B) +r(G), r(A) +r(C) +r(G)

.

Corollary 3.6Let AÎ Cm × n,BÎCm × p,CÎ Cq × n,DÎCm × s,GÎCt × n,MÎ Cq × p, andNÎ Ct × s. then the inclusionR(BM(1)C + DN(1)G

)⊆R(A) holds for every M(1)Î M

{1} andN(1)Î N{1} if and only if T˜1=O orT˜2=O or T˜3=O.

On the other hand, from (39) and Theorems 2.5 and 3.3, we can easily obtain the minimal rank of the partial matrix (A BM(1)C DN(1)G) with respect toM(1)Î M{1} and N(1)ÎN

(14)

Theorem 3.7 LetAÎCm × n, BÎ Cm × p,CÎ Cq × n,DÎ Cm × s,GÎ Ct × n,MÎ Cq × p, andNÎCt × s.

Then

min

M(1)M{1},N(1)N{1}r(A BM

(1)C DN(1)G)

=r(A) +r(A D) +r(A B) +r(A B D) +r

M O C O B A O D

r

B A M O

r

B A D M O O

r

O O C O M B A O D O

+ 3r(M)

+ max

r

N O G O D A O B

+r

O O G N B A O O

+r

N O O O GO M O C O D B A O O

⎞ ⎠

r

N O O GD B A O O M O O

⎞ ⎠r

N O O O G OaO O O C O M D B A O O O

⎠+r(N)−ξ1−ξ2,

r(G) +r(A D) +r(A B D) +r

M O C OB A O D O G O

⎞ ⎠r

B A D M O O

r

O C O O M A O B D O

−2ξ3

,

(41)

where

ξ1= min

⎧ ⎨ ⎩r

O M O CD B A O N O O O

⎠+r(G)−r(M), r

D A B N O O

+r(G),

r

D A N O

+r(C) +r(G)

ξ2= min{r

O O O G O NM O C O O O B A O O D O

r(M), r

O G O O N A O B D O

,

r

O O G O NA O O D O O C O O O

⎞ ⎠,

ξ3= min{r

M O C O B A O D

+r(G)−r(M), r(A B D) +r(G), r(A D) +r(C) +r(G)}.

Corollary 3.8 LetAÎ Cm × n,BÎ Cm × p,CÎ Cq × n,DÎ Cm × s,GÎ Ct × n,M Î Cq × p, andNÎCt × s. then there are someM(1)Î M

{1} andN(1)ÎN{1}, such that the inclusion R(BM(1)C+DN(1)G)⊆R(A) holds if and only if the right side of (41) is zero.

Acknowledgements

The authors would likes to thank the Editor-in-Chief and the anonymous referees for their very detailed comments, which greatly improved the presentation of this article. The research of the Z. Xiong was supported by the start-up fund of Wuyi University Jiangmen 529020, Guangdong province, P.R. China and the foundation for High-Level Talents in Guangdong province, P.R. China. The research of the S.Yuan was supported by Guangdong Natural Science Fund of China (No.10452902001005845).

Authors’contributions

The authors jointly worked on deriving the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Competing interests

(15)

Received: 26 August 2011 Accepted: 6 March 2012 Published: 6 March 2012

References

1. Penrose, R: A generalized inverse for matrices. Proc Cambridge Philos Soc.51, 406–413 (1955). doi:10.1017/ S0305004100030401

2. Ben-Israel, A, Greville, TNE: Generalized Inverse: Theory and Applications, Wiley-Interscience, 1974, 2nd edn.Springer-Verlag, New York (2002)

3. Wang, G, Wei, Y, Qiao, S: Generalized Inverses: Theory and Computations. Science Press, Beijing (2004) 4. Braden, HW: The matrix equationATX ± XTA=B. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl.20, 295302 (1998). doi:10.1137/

S0895479897323270

5. Johnson, CR, Whitney, GT: Minimum rank completions. Linear and multilinear Algebra.28, 271–273 (1991). doi:10.1080/ 03081089108818051

6. Tian, Y: Ranks of solutions of the matrix equationAXB=C. Linear and multilinear Algebra.51, 111–125 (2003). doi:10.1080/0308108031000114631

7. Bostain, AA, Woerdeman, HJ: Unicity of minimal rank completions for tri-diagonal partial block matrices. Linear Algebra Appl.325, 23–25 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(00)00253-6

8. Cohen, N, Johnson, CR, Rodman, L, Woerdeman, HJ: Ranks of completions of partial matrices. Oper Theory Adv Appl. 40, 165–185 (1989)

9. Marsaglia, G, Styan, GPH: Equalities and inequalities for ranks of matrices. Linear and multilinear Algebra.2, 269292 (1974). doi:10.1080/03081087408817070

10. Woerdeman, HJ: Minimal rank completions for block matrices. Linear Algebra Appl.121, 105122 (1989)

11. Woerdeman, HJ: Minimal rank completions of partial banded matrices. Linear and multilinear Algebra.36, 59–69 (1993). doi:10.1080/03081089308818275

12. Davis, C: Completing a matrix so as to minimize its rank. Oper Theory Adv Appl.29, 87–95 (1988)

13. Johnson, CR: Matrix completion problems: a survey in matrix theory and applications. Proc Sympos Appl Math AMS.40, 171–179 (1990)

14. Rao, CR, Mitra, SK: Generlized Inverse of matrices and its Application. Wiley, New York (1971)

15. Tian, Y: Completing block matrices with maximal and minimal ranks. Linear Algebra Appl.321, 327345 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(00)00224-X

16. Tian, Y: The minimal rank of a 3 × 3 partial block matrix. Linear and multilinear Algebra.50, 125131 (2002). doi:10.1080/03081080290019531

17. Cohen, N, Dancis, J: Maximal rank Hermitian completions of partially specified Hermitian matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 244, 265–276 (1996)

18. Liu, Y, Tian, Y: More on extremal ranks of the matrix expressionsA-BX±X*B* with statistical applications. Numer Linear Algebra Appl.15, 307–325 (2008). doi:10.1002/nla.553

19. Liu, Y, Tian, Y: Extremal ranks of submatrices in an Hermitian solution to the matrix equationAX A* =Bwith applications. J Appl Math Comput.32, 289–301 (2010). doi:10.1007/s12190-009-0251-8

20. Tian, Y, Liu, Y: Extremal ranks of some symmetric matrix expressions with applications. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl.28, 890905 (2006). doi:10.1137/S0895479802415545

21. Mitra, SK: A pair of simulations linear matrix equationsA1X1B1=C1andA2X2B2=C2and a programming problem.

Linear Algebra Appl.131, 107123 (1990)

22. Puntanen, S, Styan, GHP, Tian, Y: Three rank formulas associated with the covariance matrices of the BLUE and the OLSE in the general linear model. Econometric Theory.21, 659–664 (2005)

23. Rao, CR: Unified theory of linear estimation. SankhyāSer A.33, 371–394 (1971)

24. Rao, CR: Representations of best linear unbiased estimators in the Gauss-Markoff model with a singular dispersion matrix. J Multivariate Anal.3, 276–292 (1973). doi:10.1016/0047-259X(73)90042-0

25. Tian, Y: Upper and lower bounds for ranks of matrix expressions using generalized inverses. Linear Algebra Appl.355, 187214 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(02)00345-2

26. Tian, Y: Using rank formulas to characterize equalities for Moore-Penrose inverse of matrix products. Appl Math Comput.147, 581600 (2004). doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00796-8

27. Tian, Y: More on maximal and minimal ranks of Schur complements with applications. Appl Math Comput.152, 675692 (2004). doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00585-X

28. Tian, Y, Cheng, S: The maximal and minimal ranks ofA-BXCwith applications. New York J Math.9, 345–362 (2003)

doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2012-54

References

Related documents

for recruitment and selection, 3/5 of the people said that the company recruits the employee from the external sources and 1/5 of the people prefer internal source of

If you purchased a Managed Service Level, then your use of Cloud Servers shall include the following: (i) use of Rackspace's Cloud Monitoring Service and up to 8 Checks per

Results: We investigated the centrosome status and mitotic abnormalities in three thyroid carcinoma-derived cell lines, each maintaining the specific, biologically relevant

that the KLT and cisplatin can significantly re- duce the number of TAM in Lewis lung carci- noma and when combined, the number of TAM in Lewis lung carcinoma

1) The versatility and low cost of wet welding makes this method highly desirable. 2) Other benefits include the speed. With which the operation is carried out. 3) It is less

Eisend, Martin (2009) A meta-analysis of humor in advertising The effect of humor advertising calculated through 369 correlations on humor advertisement, they show Tv ads and

2 Development of Research and Technology Center, Deputy of Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, IR Iran 3 Department of Community Medicine,

n Receive information about the organization, including wellness and health promotion services provided on behalf of the employer or plan sponsors; organization staff