• No results found

A note on Kakutani type fixed point theorems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A note on Kakutani type fixed point theorems"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Vol. 24, No. 4 (2000) 231–235 S0161171200004191 ©Hindawi Publishing Corp.

A NOTE ON KAKUTANI TYPE FIXED POINT THEOREMS

A. R. KHAN, N. HUSSAIN, and L. A. KHAN

(Received 3 September 1998 and in revised form 29 November 1999)

Abstract.We present Kakutani type fixed point theorems for certain semigroups of self maps by relaxing conditions on the underlying set, family of self maps, and the mappings themselves in a locally convex space setting.

Keywords and phrases. Fixed point, semigroup of self maps, locally convex space, non-expansive map.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 41A65, 46A03, 47H10.

1. Introduction. Using a technique of Tarafdar [9], we establish fixed point theo-rems by utilizing following semigroups under composition of self mapsTon a subset

Mof a Hausdorff locally convex space (i) Ᏺ=CT= {f:M→M|f T=T f},

(ii) Ᏺ= {Tn:nN∪{0}},

(iii) Ᏺ=identity map.

In the sequel(E,τ)will be a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space. A family{pα:α∈I}of seminorms defined onE is said to be an associated family of

seminorms forτif the family{r U:r >0}, whereU=ni=1UαiandUαi= {x:pαi(x) <

1}, forms a base of neighbourhoods of zero forτ. A family{pα:α∈I}of seminorms

defined onE is called an augmented associated family forτ if {pα :α∈I}is an

associated family with the property that the seminorm max{pα,pβ} ∈ {pα:α∈I}for

anyα,β∈I. The associated and augmented associated families of seminorms shall be denoted byA(τ)andA∗(τ), respectively. It is well known that given a locally convex space(E,τ), there always exists a family{pα:α∈I}of seminorms defined onEsuch

that{pα:α∈I} =A∗(τ)(see [7, page 203]).

The following construction will be crucial. Suppose thatMis aτ-bounded subset of

E. For this setM we can select a numberλα>0 for eachα∈Isuch thatM⊂λαUα,

whereUα= {x:pα(x)≤1}. Clearly,B=αλαUαisτ-bounded,τ-closed, absolutely

convex, and contains M. The linear span EB of B in E is ∞n=1nB. The Minkowski functional ofBis a norm·BonEB. Thus(EB,·B)is a normed space withBas its

closed unit ball and supαpα(x/λα)= xBfor eachx∈EB.

A self mapT onMis said to be

(i) A∗(τ)-nonexpansive if for allx,yM,

pα(T x−T y)≤pα(x−y) for eachpα∈A∗(τ). (1.1)

(2)

pαTnx−Tny≤knpα(x−y), n=1,2,3,..., for eachpα∈A∗(τ), (1.2)

where{kn}is a fixed sequence of real numbers such thatkn→1 asn→ ∞.

In sequel, for simplicity, we shall callA∗(τ)-nonexpansive(A(τ)-asymptotically nonexpansive)maps to be nonexpansive (asymptotically nonexpansive).

Common fixed points of nonexpansive maps and best approximations have been considered in normed spaces (see [1, 3]). We prove common fixed point theorems for asymptotically nonexpansive maps in the setting of a locally convex space.

2. Results

Lemma2.1. LetMbe aτ-bounded subset of a Hausdorff locally convex space(E,τ) andT :M→M be asymptotically nonexpansive map. ThenT is asymptotically non-expansive onMwith respect to·B.

Proof. By hypothesis forx,y∈Mandn=1,2,3,...,

pαTnx−Tny≤knpα(x−y) for eachpα∈A∗(τ), (2.1)

where{kn}is a real sequence converging to 1,

sup

α

TnxTny

λα

≤knsup α

xy

λα

,

TnxTny

B≤knx−yB,

(2.2)

where{kn} →1 asn→ ∞and is a fixed real sequence. This completes the proof.

Note that(EB,τ)⊂(EB, · B)so a set compact in(EB,τ)need not be compact in

(EB, · B)(cf. [8, page 159, problem 3(c)]). To overcome this difficulty we use finite

dimensionality to obtain following generalization of [9, Theorem 2.1].

Theorem2.2. LetM be a nonempty convexτ-bounded, τ-complete finite dimen-sional subset of a Hausdorff locally convex space(E,τ). Supposeis a commutative semigroup of asymptotically nonexpansive self maps of M. Then there exists a point a∈Msuch that

T (a)=a for allT∈Ᏺ. (2.3)

Proof. SinceMisτ-complete, it follows that(EB,·B)is a Banach space andMis

complete in it. A closed, bounded and finite dimensional subset of a normed space is compact by [2, Theorem on page 10] soMis compact in(EB,·B). By Lemma 2.1, each

T∈Ᏺis·B-asymptotically nonexpansive. HenceᏲis a commutative semigroup of

asymptotically nonexpansive self maps of a compact convex subsetMof the Banach space(EB,·B). The familyᏲhas a common fixed point by [4, Theorem 3.1].

We now prove another fixed point theorem for locally convex spaces by making use of Jungck and Sessa [6, Theorem 3]; see also [1, Corollary 2.3] and [5, Theorem 1].

(3)

starcentreq∈M andT :M→M is nonexpansive. Letbe a family of affine nonex-pansive self maps ofMcommuting withT and leavingqfixed. Suppose for each pair (x,y)∈M2, there existsf=f (x,y)andg=g(x,y)insuch that

pα(T x−T y)≤pα(f x−gy) for allpα∈A∗(τ). (2.4)

Then there existsa∈Msuch that

a=T (a)=h(a) for allh∈Ᏺ. (2.5)

Proof. Since · B-topology is finer than the relative τ-topology on EB, · B

-cl(M)⊂τ-sequential-cl(M)=M. Therefore,M is · B-closed in the normed space

(EB,·B). As above,Mis a compact subset of(EB,·B). Moreover,Tand eachh∈

is nonexpansive in(E,τ), which by Lemma 2.1 implies thatTand eachh∈Ᏺis·B

-nonexpansive—so certainly·B-continuous. And from (2.4) we obtain forx,y∈M,

sup

α

T xT y

λα

sup

α

f xgy

λα

. (2.6)

Thus

T x−T yB≤ f x−gyB forx,y∈M. (2.7)

A comparison of our hypothesis with that of [6, Theorem 3] tells us that we can now apply [6, Theorem 3] toMas a subset of(EB,·B)to conclude that there existsa∈M

such thata=T (a)=h(a)for allh∈Ᏺ.

Corollary2.4. Let M be a τ-bounded, τ-sequentially closed, and finite dimen-sional subset of a Hausdorff locally convex space(E,τ). AssumeM is starshaped with starcentreq∈M. Suppose T ,I:M→M are nonexpansive, I is affine and leavingq fixed andT I=IT. Suppose for x,y∈M, there existn=n(x,y), m=m(x,y) in N0= {0,1,2,...}such that

pα(T x−T y)≤pαImx−Iny for eachpα∈A∗(τ). (2.8)

ThenT andIhave a common fixed point.

Proof. LetᏲ= {In:nN0}(I0x=x). For eachn, In is affine,T In=InT and

In:MMsinceIhas these properties. Further (2.8) assures thatand its members

satisfy (2.4) and the hypotheses of Theorem 2.3; consequently, the conclusion of the corollary follows.

Corollary2.5. LetMbe aτ-bounded,τ-closed finite dimensional starshaped sub-set of a Hausdorff locally convex space(E,τ)andT a nonexpansive self map ofM. ThenT has a fixed point.

(4)

andpα∈A∗(τ), let

dpα(x,C)¯ =infpα(y−x)¯ :y∈C (2.9)

and let

D=y∈C:pα(y−x)¯ =dpα(x,C)¯ for allpα∈A∗(τ) . (2.10)

Theorem2.6. LetT andI be self maps of a Hausdorff locally convex space(E,τ) and letC⊆Ebe such thatT:∂C→C. LetT andIleavex¯∈Efixed and satisfy (2.8) for allx,y∈D∪ {x¯}. SupposeI is nonexpansive and affine,T is nonexpansive onD, IT=T IonD, andDis nonemptyτ-bounded,τ-sequentially closed, finite dimensional and starshaped with respect toq. IfIleavesqinvariant andI(D)⊆D, then there exists a∈Dsuch thata=I(a)=T (a).

Proof. Lety∈D. ThenInyDfornN0sinceI(D)D. By definition ofD,

y∈∂Cand sinceT:∂C→C, it follows thatT y∈C. By (2.8), for eachpα∈A∗(τ),

pα(T y−x)¯ =pα(T y−Tx)¯ ≤pαIny−Imx¯ (2.11)

for somen,m∈N0. AsImx¯=x¯, we get

pα(T y−x)¯ ≤pαIny−x¯ for allpα∈A∗(τ). (2.12)

Again sinceT y∈C andInyD, the definition ofDfurther implies thatT yD.

Consequently,T ,I :D→Dand the conditions of Corollary 2.4 are satisfied. Hence there existsa∈Dsuch thata=I(a)=T (a).

Acknowledgements. The first author acknowledges gratefully the support pro-vided by the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals during this research. The authors thank Naseer Shahzad for useful discussions and the referee for pointing out a short proof of Theorem 2.3.

References

[1] M. A. Al-Thagafi,Common fixed points and best approximation, J. Approx. Theory85(1996), no. 3, 318–323. MR 97f:47051. Zbl 858.41022.

[2] E. W. Cheney,Introduction to Approximation Theory, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, Toronto, Ont., London, 1966. MR 36#5568. Zbl 161.25202.

[3] R. DeMarr,Common fixed points for commuting contraction mappings, Pacific J. Math.13

(1963), 1139–1141. MR 28#2446. Zbl 191.14901.

[4] K. Goebel, W. A. Kirk, and R. L. Thele,Uniformly Lipschitzian families of transformations in Banach spaces, Canad. J. Math.26(1974), 1245–1256. MR 50#10919. Zbl 285.47039. [5] J. R. Jachymski,Another proof of the Markov-Kakutani theorem, and an extension, Math.

Japon.47(1998), no. 1, 19–20. MR 99f:47078. Zbl 930.47027.

[6] G. Jungck and S. Sessa,Fixed point theorems in best approximation theory, Math. Japon.

42(1995), no. 2, 249–252. MR 96f:47112. Zbl 834.54026.

[7] G. Köthe,Topological Vector Spaces. I, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, 1969. MR 40#1750.

(5)

[9] E. Tarafdar,Some fixed-point theorems on locally convex linear topological spaces, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.13(1975), no. 2, 241–254. MR 53#8979. Zbl 318.47032. A. R. Khan: Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan60800, Pakistan

Current address: Department ofMathematical Sciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran,31261, Saudi Arabia

E-mail address:[email protected]

N. Hussain: Centre for Advanced Studies in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Bahaud-din Zakariya University, Multan60800, Pakistan

References

Related documents

Figure 5. Elemental distribution of Phosphorous in treated Slag This was due to the fact that during melting and holding of slag at high temperature makes phase rearrange themselves

This paper will analyze these knowledge representation problems, suggest a means toward their resolution, and offer an expert legal system which models common law

In the present study, we analysed the temporal changes of fisheries landings in the six coastal lagoons (Enez, Homa, Karina, Akköy, Güllük, and Köyceğiz) along the Aegean coast

The CNN-based automated CBC assessment system developed includes new coating breakdown and cor- rosion assessment algorithms with higher accuracy to facilitate quantitative

On the other hand, the prevalence rate in the present study was five folds higher than the figure reported seven years ago from the teaching hospital in La- gos, Nigeria,

Table 3 Results of sequential multiple logistic regression models for association of antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths with socio-demographic, maternal, pregnancy, labour,

Traditional approaches that stress the protection of privacy through restrictions on the collection and use of personal infor- mation are compared with alternatives based on

CKD patients performed worse than control groups on Orientation &amp; Attention, Language, Concept Formation &amp; Reasoning, Memory, Executive Function, and Global Cognition