Choice Response
Percent
Response Total
Analytics
1 Pool Lifeguard 0.00% 0 Mean 5.000
2 Senior First Aid 0.00% 0 Standard Deviation 0.000
3 Community Surf Lifesaving Certificate
0.00% 0 Standard Error 0.000
4 Unsure 0.00% 0 Variance 0.000
5 Other (please specify) 100.00% 2 Top 2 0.00%
Bottom 2 0.00%
When did your employees begin the course with Life Saving Victoria?
Total Respondents: 2
Total Skipped: 0
Choice Response Total
Month: January 1
Month: February 0
Month: March 0
Month: April 0
Month: May 0
Month: June 0
Month: July 1
Month: August 0
Month: September 0
Month: October 0
Month: November 0
Month: December 0
Please rate the following statements about your employees' training from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree
Total Respondents: 2 Total Skipped: 0
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A Response Total Top 2 Bottom 2
Trainers were effective in
their teaching.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Trainers had good knowledge
and experience of
the industry.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Trainers were able to relate material to
the workplace
0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0 0 2 0 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Overall, we are satisfied
with the training.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
We would recommend the training to others.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Assessments were based on realistic activities.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 0 0 7 5 0
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A Response Total Top 2 Bottom 2
The training organisation
gave appropriate recognition of existing knowledge and skills.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Assessment was at an appropriate
standard.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training focused on
relevant skills.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training prepared employees well for work.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training had a good mix of theory and practice.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
We would recommend the training organisation
to others.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Please rate the following statements about your employees' training from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree
Total Respondents: 2 Total Skipped: 0
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A Response Total Top 2 Bottom 2
The training was an effective investment.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training reflected
current practice.
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training was effectively integrated into our organisation.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Our employees gained the skills they needed from this training.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training has helped
our employees
work with people.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training helped employees identify how
to build on their current
knowledge and skills.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Disagree
Our employees gained the knowledge they needed
from this training.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training prepared our employees
for the demands of
work.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training used up-to-
date equipment, facilities and
materials.
0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0 0 2 0 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training resources
were appropriate
for learner needs.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Training resources
and equipment were in good
condition.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training organisation acted on feedback from employers.
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Please rate the following statements about your employees' training from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree
Total Respondents: 2 Total Skipped: 0
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A Response Total Top 2 Bottom 2
The training organisation developed customised
programs.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The way employees
were assessed was a fair test of their
skills and knowledge.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training organisation was flexible enough to
meet our needs.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training organisation
dealt satisfactorily
with any issues or complaints.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training organisation provided good support for workplace training and assessment.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
The training organisation
clearly explained what was expected
from employers.
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00% 100.00%
Number
32778563 Trainers were great, Little more emphasis on FA for a client with disability.
Prue Sanders from LSV has been responsive to our needs , courteous and professional in her work, a pleasure and privilege to deal with. If there was an award that LSV provides to their staff I would recommend her for that award based on her work ethic and commitment to her role and in supporting the South Division. This I am sure is echoed across the State under this contract.
32804929 Experienced personnel who connected well with staff and made the training enjoyable
What aspects of the training were MOST IN NEED OF IMPROVEMENT?
Total Respondents: 2 Total Skipped: 0
Response Number
Response
32778563 I would like to see an information session being provided to house supervisors by LSV as to the on-line enrollment process, course content and accreditation requirements at a House Supervisors forum. It would also be a nice option if House Supervisors could book staff in on-line i.e. have adminstration access rights.
32804929 Issue here from our end.
Staff are not provided with tea, coffee or water for that matter. Formerly a light lunch was also provided.
Staff are disatisfied with the DHS decision to not provide even basics refreshements and as such are not happy to attend
