arXiv:2101.11528v1 [physics.app-ph] 27 Jan 2021
*correspondence:chiranjib@iiserkol.ac.in
D
etection of electron spin resonance down to
10 K
using localized
spoof surface plasmon
Preprint,compiledJanuary28, 2021
Subhadip Roy , Anuvab Nandi , Pronoy Das , and Chiranjib Mitra*
Department of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, India.
A
bstract
In this study, novel use of the electromagnetic field profile of a localized spoof surface plasmonic mode to detect electron spin resonance is being reported. The mode is supported on a resonator with a complementary metallic spiral structure, etched on the ground plane of a microstrip line having a characteristic impedance of 50Ω. The change in characteristics of the mode of interest with lowering of temperature has been observed and analyzed. Electron spin resonance spectra of a standard paramagnetic sample, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, are recorded using this resonator down to 10 K. Potential application of the mode in the detection of microwave Rashba field-driven electron spin resonance has been discussed.
Keywords Localized Spoof Surface Plasmon·Complementary Metallic Spiral Structure·Electron Spin Resonance
1
I
ntroduction
Surface plasmons are electromagnetic waves which exist on metal and dielectric interface at optical frequencies [1],[2],[3]. They can either propagate at the interface as surface plasmon polaritons or can be resonant in the form of localized surface plasmons (LSPs) [4],[5]. However, at low-frequency range such as at microwave and terahertz frequencies, metals behave as nearly perfect electric conductors which prevent the excita-tion of these surface modes [6]. Patterned metallic surfaces can support surface waves at low frequencies, which have features similar to original surface plasmons, and are known as spoof surface plasmons [7],[8],[9]. Similar to the original LSPs, the localized spoof surface plasmons (LSSPs) show strong field confinement [10],[11]. This property of LSSPs has been uti-lized in this work for the detection of electron spin resonance (ESR) and related measurements. Previously, LSSP modes have been used for sensing purposes only [12],[13].
ESR occurs when a resonant microwave radiation cause tran-sition of electrons between spin levels in the presence of an external Zeeman magnetic field in paramagnetic systems [14]. The sample under study is placed in the region of a uniform mi-crowave magnetic field, orthogonal to the Zeeman field to cause ESR transitions [15]. So far, cavity resonators [16], lumped res-onators [17] and planar resonators [18] have been used for mi-crowave magnetic field generation at the position of the sample. LSSP modes can be generated on a complementary metallic spi-ral structure (CMSS) [19],[20]. An LSSP mode supported on a resonator, consisting of a CMSS excited by a microstrip line [13] has been used in this work for detection of ESR. The LSSP resonator has been simulated, and the fabricated resonator is used to record ESR spectra of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) down to 10 K. In section 2, detailed description of the LSSP resonator has been provided. Elaborate description of low-temperature setup for recording ESR spectra is done in section3, followed by section4containing the results and re-lated discussion. The study is concluded in section5, with a dis-cussion on the potential application of the designed resonator in the detection of ESR transitions caused by a microwave Rashba field in low dimensional systems.
2
T
he
L
ocalized
S
poof
S
urface
P
lasmonic
R
esonator
2.1 Geometry
The Localized Spoof Surface Plasmonic Resonator (LSSPR) comprises a CMSS etched on the ground plane of a microstrip transmission line along with conducting trace on the other side which excites the LSSP modes. Four spiral air slots of widthw
=0.24 mm and having a separations=0.2 mm with respect to adjacent slot wraps 1.5 times to form the CMSS structure with outer radiusR=2.88 mm. The signal trace on the opposite face has a widthb=1.2 mm, which corresponds to 50Ω character-istic impedance. Figures1(a) & (b) illustrate the LSSPR and the CMSS, respectively. Port 1 Port 2 b a) 200 R w ---s b) 200 m
Figure 1: (a) The LSSPR along with excitation ports. (b) The CMSS located on the ground plane with dimensions marked.
2.2 Simulation&Fabrication
Simulation of the LSSPR having dimensions indicated in sub-section 2.1 is carried out in CST Microwave Studio (CST MWS) software. The microwave laminate used in the process is AD1000 [21] (Rogers Corporation, USA). The laminate has a dielectric constant of 10.7 for a thickness of 1.5 mm and a dis-sipation factor of 0.0023 defined at 10 GHz. A 17.5µm thick
copper layer is present on both sides of the dielectric. In the simulation setup, the electrical conductivity of copper is taken as 5.96×107 S/m, which is the pre-defined value available in CST MWS. Frequency-domain solver with open (add space)
boundary condition on the ground plane side and open bound-ary condition on all other sides of the structure has been used while running the simulation.
The fabrication of the structure is carried out using a rapid pro-totyping process employing optical lithography [22] followed by wet etching [23]. SMA connectors are soldered at either end of the conducting trace for the propagation of microwave signal. The fabricated LSSPR with the CMSS on the ground plane and the signal trace are shown in figures2(a) & (b) respectively.
a) b)
Figure 2: (a) The CMSS structure after fabrication. (b) The signal trace with SMA connectors soldered on it.
2.3 Characterization
The LSSPR is characterized by measuring its transmission spectrum and comparing it with the simulated result. The measurement is carried out using a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) (ZVA 24, Rohde & Schwarz). The VNA is calibrated using through, open, short and match (TOSM) standards before performing the measurements. Figure3 compares the measured response (black) with the simulated one (red). The deviation between the two responses may be attributed to the tolerance of the fabrication process. In the 2-4 GHz frequency range, the transmission spectrum shows two dips marked asM1 &M2 which are the two fundamental LSSP resonance modes.
M1is the magnetic LSSP mode andM2 is the electrical LSSP mode [13],[19]. 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 M 2 M 2 M 1 Measured Simulated S 2 1 ( d B ) Frequency (GHz) M 1
Figure 3: Comparison of the simulated (red) & measured (black) transmission spectra of the LSSPR in 2-4 GHz range.
3
A
pplication of the
LSSPR
in detection of
electron spin resonance down to
10 K
The LSSP mode M2 resonating at 3.46 GHz (measured) as shown in figure 3 is chosen for the application in the detec-tion of electron spin resonance. A uniform magnetic field is obtained in the central part of the resonator as shown in figure
4.
Figure 4: Cross-sectional view of the simulated microwave magnetic field distribution in theyzplane.
The Zeeman fieldB0is applied along thex-direction as shown
in figure5. Hence the magnitude of the component of the mi-crowave magnetic field perpendicular toB0is given by|B⊥|= q
|B1z|2+|B1y|2. Figures5and6show the distribution of|B⊥|
and the electric field just above the CMSS structure, respec-tively.
B0
Figure 5: Distribution of|B⊥| just above the CMSS structure. The direction ofB0alongx-axis is indicated.
Figure 6: Distribution of the electric field just above the CMSS structure.
Temperature variation of theM2 mode’s properties is investi-gated by mounting the LSSPR inside a closed-cycle cryogen-free cryostat (OptistatDry BLV, Oxford Instruments) on a cus-tom designed copper holder attached to the cold head. The
stability of temperature during measurements is maintained by using a temperature controller (MercuryiTC, Oxford Instru-ments). The LSSPR is attached to a dielectric spacer for elec-trical insulation which in turn is stuck to the holder. Apiezon N grease and a cyanoacrylate adhesive are used to provide ther-mal contact and mechanical stability respectively. The arrange-ment is depicted in Figure7. Hand formable microwave cables (086-2SM+, Mini-Circuits) connect the LSSPR to the VNA via hermetically sealed adapters (PE9184, Pasternack) fitted to the cryostat body. TOSM calibration is performed at room ature before the commencement of measurement at low temper-atures.
Cold Head
Copper
holder
Dielectric Spacer Flexible SMA cable ResonatorFigure 7: The mounted empty LSSPR inside the cryostat. Continuous wave electron spin resonance spectroscopy is per-formed on 4mg of DPPH sample at different temperature values in the 10 K to 295 K temperature range. The powder sample is wrapped in teflon tape and is affixed on the CMSS structure with the help of Apiezon N grease. It is placed on the central part of the resonator as the microwave magnetic field is uniform there. Figure8shows the sample location on the LSSPR.
Figure 8: Location of the sample on the LSSPR
The cryostat loaded with the sample is placed between the pole pieces of an electromagnet (3473-70, GMW). The electromag-net provides the external Zeeman field. The VNA connected to the LSSPR acts as the source and detector of microwaves. It is set to have a measurement bandwidth of 1 MHz with a frequency step size of 500 kHz. An averaging factor of 25 with 15 dBm port power is used for recording the ESR spec-tra. The programmable power supply (SGA60X83D, Sorensen) connected to the electromagnet, and the VNA are interfaced us-ing a Python script. Temperature is manually set on the tem-perature controller before recording an ESR spectrum. The schematic of the low temperature ESR setup is shown in figure
9. V.N.A. ++ Power Supply Personal Computer Temperature Controller Cryostat
N
S
B0Figure 9: Schematic of the low temperature ESR setup
4
R
esults
& D
iscussion
The temperature evolution ofM2 mode for the empty LSSPR is plotted in figure10. The shift of the resonant frequency (fres)
and the variation in the loaded quality factor (Q-factor) of the
M2 mode for the empty LSSPR with temperature are shown in figure11. The factor is calculated using the relation, Q-factor= fres
∆f3dB, where∆f3dB is the bandwidth at +3dB above
the minimum forward transmission coefficient S21value which occurs atfres[24],[25],[26]. 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 10 K S 2 1 ( d B ) Frequency (GHz) 10 K 25 K 50 K 75 K 100 K 125 K 150 K 175 K 200 K 225 K 250 K 275 K 295 K 295 K
Figure 10: Temperature evolution ofM2 mode for the empty LSSPR.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3.39 3.40 3.41 3.42 3.43 3.44 3.45 3.46 f res Q-factor Temperature (K) f r e s ( G H z ) 150 200 250 300 350 400 Q -f a c t o r ( a r b . u n i t s )
Figure 11: Change in the resonant frequency,fres (black) and
Q-factor (red) with temperature for the empty LSSPR.
A shift of 67 MHz is observed infresat 10 K in comparison to
its value at 295 K. Thermal contraction and change in dielec-tric properties of the microwave laminate [21] can qualitatively explain this shift [27], [28], [29]. The value of the Q-factor reaches a maximum of 386 at 75 K after which it decreases slightly down to 10 K. The enhancement in Q-factor at low temperature can be attributed to the reduction in resistive power loss [29].
Figure12shows the temperature evolution of theM2mode af-ter placement of the DPPH sample. In comparison to figure
10, after placement of the sample,fresshifts to lower values for
the entire measurement temperature range (10 K-295 K). The dielectric property of the teflon wrapped sample perturbs the electric field (figure6) on the CMSS [19] leading to the shift in
fresvalues at different temperatures.
3.2 3.4 3.6 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 S 2 1 ( d B ) Frequency (GHz) 10 K 25 K 50 K 75 K 100 K 150 K 200 K 250 K 295 K 295 K 10 K
Figure 12: Temperature evolution ofM2 mode for the LSSPR loaded with sample.
The change in the transmission dip of theM2 mode as a func-tion of externally sweptB0 is recorded for obtaining the ESR spectrum at different temperature values. The recorded ESR spectra at 10 K and room temperature along with a fit to a Lorentzian is shown in figure13.
(a)
(b)
Figure 13: ESR signal fitted by a Lorentzian curve (red) recorded at (a) 10 K (b) 295 K (room temperature)
The g-factor and ESR line width [30] are measured & plotted for different temperature values as shown in figure 14(a) & (b) respectively. The measured values of the g-factor and line width of the DPPH sample show satisfactory agreement with the values reported in the literature [31].
Figure 14: Measured (a) g-factor & (b) ESR line width at dif-ferent temperature values.
The signal to noise ratio (SNR) [32],[33] is around 46 at 10 K & 34 at 295 K. Spin sensitivity [34],[35] is about 1016spins/gauss for the sample used with a measured ESR line width of 3.36 G at 10 K. The LSSPR based ESR spectrometer has SNR value which is one order lower than the spectrometers developed by us [22],[23] that utilize planar transmission line based res-onators in reflection geometry and consequently has spin sensi-tivity value which is one order higher.
5
C
onclusion
The LSSPR has been successfully fabricated using a rapid pro-totyping technique, resulting in a good agreement between the measured and simulated responses. Temperature evolution of the used LSSP mode has been shown and explained. Estimated values of the g-factor and line width show good agreement with previously reported values. This is the first study to the best of our knowledge, where the magnetic field of an LSSP mode has been used to detect ESR spectra of a paramagnetic sample. The simultaneous confinement of microwave electric and mag-netic fields in theM2 mode can make detection of ESR
sig-nal from materials having high dielectric loss challenging [29]. However, this feature can enable one to observe the effects of Zeeman field and Rashba field in the same ESR spectrum. The microwave electric field induces a microwave Rashba field in low symmetry systems (1D & 2D samples) which can give rise to ESR transition apart from the conventional ESR transitions caused by microwave magnetic field [36],[37].
A
cknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Education (MoE), Government of India & Science and Engineering Re-search Board (SERB) (grant no.- EMR/2016/007950) for fund-ing this work. S. R. acknowledges Council of Scientific & In-dustrial Research (CSIR), India for research fellowship. The au-thors thank Prof. Bhaskar Gupta, Department of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, Jadavpur University for pro-viding simulation facilities. The authors are grateful to Roger Corporation, USA, for the microwave laminate samples.
R
eferences
[1] Visser, T. D. "Surface plasmons at work?." Nature Physics,
2(8), 509-510(2006).
[2] Raether, H. “Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Sur-faces and on Gratings.” (Springer, Berlin, 1988).
[3] Barnes, W., Dereux, A. & Ebbesen, T. "Surface plasmon subwavelength optics." Nature,424, 824–830 (2003). [4] Yu, H., Peng, Y., Yang, Y., & Li, Z. Y. "Plasmon-enhanced
light–matter interactions and applications." npj Computa-tional Materials,5(1), 1-14(2019).
[5] Maier, S.A. "Plasmonics: Fundamentals and applications." (Springer, New York, 2007).
[6] Hibbins, A. P., Evans, B. R., & Sambles, J. R. "Experimen-tal verification of designer surface plasmons." Science,308
(5722), 670-672(2005).
[7] Huidobro, P. A., Shen, X., Cuerda, J., Moreno, E., Martin-Moreno, L., Garcia-Vidal, F. J., Cui, T.J. & Pendry, J. B. "Magnetic localized surface plasmons." Physical Review X,
4(2), 021003(2014).
[8] Pors, A., Moreno, E., Martin-Moreno, L., Pendry, J. B., & Garcia-Vidal, F. J. "Localized spoof plasmons arise while texturing closed surfaces." Physical Review Letters,108(22), 223905(2012).
[9] Pendry, J. B., Martin-Moreno, L., & Garcia-Vidal, F. J. "Mimicking surface plasmons with structured surfaces." Sci-ence,305(5685), 847-848(2004).
[10] Zayats, A. V., & Smolyaninov, I. I. "Near-field photon-ics: surface plasmon polaritons and localized surface plas-mons." Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics,5(4), S16(2003).
[11] Li, Z., Xu, B., Gu, C., Ning, P., Liu, L., Niu, Z., & Zhao, Y. "Localized spoof plasmons in closed textured cavities." Applied Physics Letters,104(25), 251601(2014).
[12] Zhou, J., Chen, L., Sun, Q., Liao, D., Ding, L., Balakin, A.V., Shkurinov, A.P., Xie, J., Zang, X., Cheng, Q. and Zhu,
Y., "Terahertz on-chip sensing by exciting higher radial order spoof localized surface plasmons." Applied Physics Express,
13(1), 012014(2019).
[13] Xie, Z., Wang, G., Sun, L., Li, Y., & Cao, R. "Localised spoof surface plasmon-based sensor for omni-directional cracks detection in metal surfaces." IET Microwaves, An-tennas & Propagation,13(12), 2061-2066(2019).
[14] Brustolon, M., Giamello, E. "Electron Paramagnetic Res-onance - A Practioner’s Toolkit." (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009)
[15] Miksch, B., Dressel, M., & Scheffler, M. "Cryogenic frequency-domain electron spin resonance spectrometer based on coplanar waveguides and field modulation." Re-view of Scientific Instruments,91(2), 025106(2020). [16] Mett, R. R., & Hyde, J. S. "Microwave leakage from
first-field modulation slots in TE 011 electron paramagnetic res-onance cavities." Review of Scientific Instruments, 76(1), 014702(2005).
[17] Froncisz, W., & Hyde, J. S. "The loop-gap resonator: a new microwave lumped circuit ESR sample structure." Jour-nal of Magnetic Resonance (1969),47(3), 515-521(1982). [18] Narkowicz, R., Suter, D., & Stonies, R. "Planar
microres-onators for EPR experiments." Journal of Magnetic Reso-nance,175(2), 275-284(2005).
[19] Gao, Z., Gao, F., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, B. "Complementary structure for designer localized surface plasmons." Applied Physics Letters,107(19), 191103(2015).
[20] Gao, Z., Gao, F., & Zhang, B. "High-order spoof local-ized surface plasmons supported on a complementary metal-lic spiral structure." Scientific Reports,6, 24447(2016). [21] Rogers Corporation, AD1000 data sheet,
https://rogerscorp.com/-/media/project/rogerscorp/documents/ advanced-connectivity-solutions/english/data-sheets/
ad1000-data-sheet.pdf .
[22] Roy, S., Saha, S., Sarkar, J., & Mitra, C. "Development of planar microstrip resonators for electron spin resonance spectroscopy." European Physical Journal Applied Physics
90(3), 31001(2020).
[23] Roy, S., Nandi, A., Das, P., & Mitra, C. "S-band electron spin resonance spectroscopy using a short-circuited coplanar waveguide resonator." IOPSciNotes1(3), 035202(2020). [24] Melik, R., Perkgoz, N. K., Unal, E., Dilli, Z., & Demir, H.
V. "Design and Realization of a Fully On-Chip High-Q Res-onator at 15 GHz on Silicon." IEEE Transactions on Elec-tron Devices,55(12), 3459-3466(2008).
[25] Li, H., Wang, Y., Wei, L., Zhou, P., Wei, Q., Cao, C., Fang, Y., Yu, Y. & Wu, P. "Experimental demonstrations of high-Q superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators." Chinese Science Bulletin,58(20), 2413-2417(2013).
[26] Rusni, I. M., Ismail, A., Alhawari, A. R. H., Hamidon, M. N., & Yusof, N. A. "An aligned-gap and centered-gap rect-angular multiple split ring resonator for dielectric sensing applications." Sensors,14(7), 13134-13148(2014).
[27] Narkowicz, R., Suter, D., & Niemeyer, I. "Scaling of sen-sitivity and efficiency in planar microresonators for electron spin resonance." Review of Scientific Instruments, 79(8), 084702(2008).
[28] Rahim, M.J., Lehleiter, T., Bothner, D., Krellner, C., Koelle, D., Kleiner, R., Dressel, M. and Schef-fler, M., "Metallic coplanar resonators optimized for low-temperature measurements." Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics,49(39), 395501(2016).
[29] Abhyankar, N., Agrawal, A., Shrestha, P., Maier, R., McMichael, R. D., Campbell, J., & Szalai, V. "Scalable microresonators for room-temperature detection of electron spin resonance from dilute, sub-nanoliter volume solids." Science Advances,6(44), eabb0620(2020).
[30] Fujita, N., Matsumoto, D., Sakurai, Y., Kawahara, K., Ago, H., Takenobu, T., & Marumoto, K. " Direct observa-tion of electrically induced Pauli paramagnetism in single-layer graphene using ESR spectroscopy." Scientific Reports,
6, 34966(2016).
[31] Poole, C. P. "Electron Spin Resonance: A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques." (Dover Publications, NY, 1996).
[32] Nakaoka, R., & Hirata, H. "Noise characteristics of a 750-MHz electronically tunable resonator for electron para-magnetic resonance spectroscopy." AIP Advances, 9(7), 075312(2019).
[33] Kiss, S.Z., Rostas, A.M., Heidinger, L., Spengler, N., Meissner, M.V., MacKinnon, N., Schleicher, E., Weber, S. and Korvink, J.G. "A microwave resonator integrated on a polymer microfluidic chip." Journal of Magnetic Resonance,
270, 169-175(2016).
[34] Assenheim, H. M. "Introduction to Electron Spin Res-onance." (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, Berlin, 2013).
[35] Slifkin, M. A., & Suleiman, Y. M. "The use of DPPH as a standard for the measurement of G-values." Radiation Ef-fects,27(1-2), 111-112(1975).
[36] Wilamowski, Z., Solnica, M., Michaluk, E., Havlicek, M., & Jantsch, W. "EPR line shape and magnetometry—chances and pitfalls." Semiconductor Science and Technology,26(6), 064009(2011).
[37] Schulte, M., Lok, J. G. S., Denninger, G., & Dietsche, W. "Electron spin resonance on a two-dimensional electron gas in a single AlAs quantum well." Physical Review Letters,
