• No results found

Tuition Fees: to

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Tuition Fees: to"

Copied!
27
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Tuition Fees: 1998‐99 to 2013‐14 £0 £1,000 £2,000 £3,000 £4,000 £5,000 £6,000 £7,000 £8,000 £9,000 Additional fee  income Basic fee

(3)

Student loan system

No‐one has to pay fees upfront. The government  provides loans to cover the full cost of tuition fees. • Loan repayments are linked to income. You only make  repayments when your income is over £21,000 a year.  If your income drops below this amount repayments  stop. And if you never earn above this amount then  you do not pay anything back. • The loan is wiped thirty years after you graduate.  Whatever you borrow, regardless of what you’ve  repaid, in the April thirty years after you  graduate/leave university the loan is wiped.

(4)

• Tuition fee loan  • Maintenance loan to help with living costs • Maintenance grant of up to £3,250 (full‐time students only) • National Scholarship Programme (first year only) • Other awards depending on circumstances • Access to Learning Fund • Universities and colleges also offer  – bursaries and scholarships  – fee waivers – in‐kind support Financial support for low‐income students From  Government From  universities/colleges

(5)

What is fair access?

Removing barriers

Distribution across all 

universities and 

colleges

Different institutions 

face different issues

(6)

OFFA’s role

To promote and safeguard 

fair access to higher 

education for people from 

lower income backgrounds 

and other under‐

represented groups.

The main way we do this is by  approving and regulating access  agreements.

(7)

‘Under‐represented groups’

OFFA’s remit is to safeguard access to education for  under‐represented groups. These are: •people from lower‐income backgrounds  •lower socio‐economic groups •students from neighbourhoods in which relatively few  people enter higher education •some ethnic groups or sub‐groups •people who have been in care •disabled people.

(8)

How access agreements work

• All English universities and colleges that want to charge  higher fees must have an access agreement with us. • Access agreement is subject to OFFA approval. • Sets out how the institution will ensure that people  from under‐represented groups are not discouraged  from applying. • Monitored annually.

(9)

How do we assess an access agreement?

How high are the fees?

How much are they investing in access?

How is that spend allocated –

outreach, 

retention, financial support?

Is the financial support for students clear?

What are the targets – are they stretching?

(10)

How we monitor institutions’ progress against  their commitments • Formal monitoring return  after each academic year  (joint process with HEFCE) • Continuous dialogue with  institutions • What if they make less  progress than expected?

(11)

Progress

The sector as a whole has 

succeeded in widening 

participation since the 

mid‐2000s.

(12)

Trends in young participation for the most disadvantaged areas  determined by HE participation rates (POLAR2 classification)

Source: HEFCE publication 2010/03, Trends in young participation in higher education: 

(13)

Trends in young participation for areas classified by HE  participation rates (POLAR2 classification) 

Source: HEFCE publication 2010/03, Trends in young participation in higher education: 

(14)

Access to the most selective universities

The

most advantaged young 

people are six to nine times 

more likely than the most 

disadvantaged young 

people to go to one of the 

universities with the highest 

entry requirements. 

Source: Ucas, December 2012, 2012  application cycle: end of year report

(15)

What are universities doing?

Access measures included in 

access agreements include:

outreach

financial support

student success (retention, 

attainment, employability).

(16)

Estimated access agreement expenditure (including Government NSP allocation) by 2016‐17: by type of spend, HEIs and FECs Bursaries and in‐ kind support 37% Fee waivers 30% Student choice 7% Outreach 14% Retention 12% Total: £809.5 million

(17)

Outreach

• Raises aspirations – higher education is  for ‘people like me’ • Includes accurate  info on finance and  subject choices • Starts early – before  key decisions are  made • Keeps going ©Oxford Brookes University ©University of Nottingham

(18)

Student success

Retention: staying and 

completing the course

Attainment: reaching 

full potential

Employability: 

preparing for work

(19)

Financial support

Universities and colleges’ total  investment in 2012‐13:  £442.2 million This comprises: •£93.7 million on fee waivers •£340.7 million on bursaries  and scholarships •£7.8 million on ‘student  choice’ support.

(20)

Estimated fees and costs for new entrants in 2012‐13  and 2013‐14: HEIs and FECs*  * Figures include those without access agreements £8,414 £8,156 £7,803 £8,507 £8,263 £7,898 £7,000 £7,250 £7,500 £7,750 £8,000 £8,250 £8,500 £8,750 Average fee Average fee after fee  waivers Average cost after  financial support 2012‐13 2013‐14

(21)

Estimated access agreement expenditure including Government  NSP allocation 2011‐12 to 2016‐17: HEIs and FECs £0 £100 £200 £300 £400 £500 £600 £700 £800 £900 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 To ta l E xpe ndi tur e  (£ m ) Retention Outreach Financial

(22)

2012 onwards: the new landscape

2006 changes did not deter people from 

going to university; will this be true for 

2012 onwards?

Multiple factors affect choice of 

whether/where to go to university 

– not all under universities’

control

Considerable diversity in fee levels and 

financial support

What works?

(23)

WASRS archive

(24)
(25)

Shared responsibility

• Universities • Colleges • Schools/teachers • Parents • Employers …and collaboration between institutions.

(26)

Partnership in access agreements

Collaborative schemes

Collaborative targets

(27)

“The whole point of this work and this investment  is to identify and realise human potential.”

Rt Hon David Willetts MP, Minister for Universities and Science, HEFCE 2012 annual conference

References

Related documents

McCarthy and Zald’s (1977: 1218) classic formulation of resource mobilization theory – one of the foremost perspectives on social movements over the last 40 years – conceives of

Whether we are speaking of corporate training, continuing education, academic courses, or even entire degree programs, the traditional mainstays of quality assurance such as

According to the results of the content analysis conducted to find out what type of bullying behaviors the students are exposed to, it was concluded that the most common

Since AACN published The Essentials of Master’s Education for Advanced Practice Nursing in 1996 and the first set of indicators for quality doctoral nursing education in 1986,

The first national GMS, precursor of those based on Sentinel-1, was the Italian Special Plan of Remote Sensing of the Environment, launched in 2007 and aimed to cover the whole

4.)Gravitational Loop (Inner) consists of 2 coils Magnetical Coil (outer) and Gravitational Coi l(inner) - 70-80 Turns.. All Coiled Counter Clockwise (use the Right Thumb Rule

For the first part of the training stage of our approach, we attempt to train a convolutional neural network to distinguish blur type using the training images with no assumptions

Formulations based on SYNTRAN 6301 have the following properties: • Excellent, universal stain blocking properties.. • Excellent adhesion to a wide variety of substrates •