• No results found

A Structured Approach. Innovative Growth Solutions May, 2009

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Structured Approach. Innovative Growth Solutions May, 2009"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

A Structured Approach A Structured Approach Innovative Growth Solutions May, 2009

(2)

What is it?



Process:

 A series of steps and decisions that define how work is

accomplished.



Process Improvement:



Process Improvement:

 A critical, objective analysis of those steps and decisions

for the purpose of implementing changes to ensure a higher, measurable level of efficiency, quality, and customer satisfaction.

(3)

Major Steps and Components

1. Inventory

 Major tasks/ processes

2. Criteria & Selection

3. Get stakeholder input

4. Develop success Board support Special projects 4. Develop success measures 5. Work Breakdown 6. Reconstruct processes 7. Test internally

8. Test with Stakeholders

9. Measure results of test

(4)

1. Inventory

 Identify and briefly describe major work processes

 Describe key attributes:

 Time  Staff

 Work products

 Organizational outcomes/ business

purpose

Represent

 Analyze at high level:

 Which processes consume the most

time?

 Which are most complex?  Which affect the most staff?

 Which most impact product/service?  Are there unnecessary tasks?

 Develop Work Process Improvement

“Short List” • Staff input/ feedback Feedback • Take notes at meeting Represent Staff views • UDD views • Ops views Edit/input to policy proposal

(5)

2.Develop and Apply Selection

Criteria

Staff time by Activity

Board support

 Brainstorm key factors &

measures to guide process selection, e.g.:

 Potential staff time savings  Multiple staff involved vs.

one/few staff IT Projects Knowledge Mgmt Proj Portfolio Re-Org one/few staff  Service improvement potential  Risk of change  Complexity  Degree of control

 Evaluate “Short List”

 Select 1-3 candidates for

(6)

3. Stakeholder Input

 Involve stakeholders early and often:  Improves the chances of success  Improved customer satisfaction

 Involve stakeholders in selecting targets for WPI and in development of success measures

 Key questions:

 Who is affected? i.e. who consumes your work  Who is affected? i.e. who consumes your work

product?

 How satisfied are they with current service levels?

 Where are the current gaps? (Timeliness, accuracy, etc.)

 What would customers most like to see improved?

 What does “improved service” mean for customers?

 Involve stakeholders in back-end testing/evaluation

(7)

4. Develop Success Measures

 Develop success metrics in

advance

 Simple and “SMART”

 Specific  Measurable 3 4 5 6  Measurable  Achievable  Repeatable  Time-specific

 Measure process against

metrics before making process changes

 Get stakeholder input on

metrics, targets, & ratings

0 1 2 3 Present Future Target

(8)

5. Work Breakdown – Step A



This is the “meat” of the

process



Define key inputs and

outputs/outcomes

Inputs

Information Resources Constraints

outputs/outcomes



Start with high-level

description of

“transformation” – the

process by which inputs

are converted into key

work products – major

steps only

Key Work Products

Customers Business Outcomes Work Process A

(9)

5. Work Breakdown – Step B



Break the process into

major component steps



Define interim

inputs/outputs

Work Process A.1

Process Description Outputs

Inputs

Information Resources Constraints

inputs/outputs

 Note that External

Inputs and Outputs remain the same



Describe each step in

“Structured English”

Key Work Products

Customers Business Outcomes

Work Process A.3

Process Description Outputs

Work Process A.2

Process Description Outputs Process Description Outputs

(10)

5. Work Breakdown – Step C



Continue breaking

process steps down until

there are no further

interim inputs/outputs

Work Process A.1.1

Process Description Outputs

Inputs

Information Resources Constraints

interim inputs/outputs



Some steps may require

more breakdowns



Test: Can you

reconstruct the process

from the description?

Outputs to Step A.2 Work Process A.1.3

Process Description Outputs

Work Process A.1.2

Process Description Outputs Process Description Outputs

(11)

6. Reconstruct Processes

 Analyze the process:

 Are there duplications?

 What is the value of the steps?

 Are there unnecessary steps/outputs?

 Where do bottlenecks and breakdowns occur?

 Where do bottlenecks and breakdowns occur?

 Are there opportunities for automation or streamlining?

 Brainstorm / research options to eliminate

bottlenecks, and automate or eliminate repetitive steps

 Re-assemble the process using only the essential steps

(12)

7. Test Internally

 Internal test to “dry run”

application of the new

process before the old process is removed

 Can you produce the same

results in parallel? • Products • Pre-test measures

Old

Way

results in parallel?  Analyze:

 Is the process capable of

producing desired results?

 Is it sustainable?

 Measure new process vs. old

 If new process does not meet

objective, return to Analysis step 5

Way

• Products • Post-test measures

New

Way

(13)

8. Test With Stakeholders

 Let the new process’s

outputs substitute for the old  Stakeholders evaluate outcomes • Products • Pre-test measures

Old

Way

outcomes

 Does the process produce

desired results?

 Are improvements

evident?

 If new process does not

meet objective, return to Analysis step 5

Way

• Products • Post-test measures

New

Way

(14)

9. Measure and Evaluate



Apply all measures to

new process



Compare results to

intended & “old”

3

4 5 6

Present

intended & “old”

measures



Were targets reached?



Were improvements

made?

0 1 2 3 Future Target Post-change actual

(15)

10. Implement

 At its simplest, implementation

means you discard the old process and adopt the new

 But you also should:

 Communicate the change to

stakeholders stakeholders

 Reward / thank staff, stakeholders

 Document the new process using

results of Work Breakdown/Design

 Repeat: How replicable is this to

other processes in / across the agency?

References

Related documents

Fashion Institute of Technology New England College Susquehanna University York College

The difference in subjective ratings of the two stimulus types following acquisition indicates that fear conditioning did in fact take place, as it demonstrates that

With the ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement and Evaluate) approach (Branch, 2009), we redesign the syllabus on the concentration how to teach fiction or in this case

Bruns (2008) uses the term produsage to describe a range of practices in which individuals are simultaneously users and producers of media content. These

The similarity in the level of consumption of all diets indicate that birds had the same level of acceptability for both GNC and urea-fermented BDG based diets The

The basic configuration consists in providing the settings for the glance server address, RabbitMQ server address, Nova database and the path where the Nova compute

of agricultural productivity of farm settlements in Southwest Nigeria. An analysis of energy utilization for sustainable wheat and cotton production in Southeastern Anatolia region

I will consider the development of the written form of African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and the political motivations involved in language development before