• No results found

FROM COLLABORATIVE DATA EDITING TO LIBRARY CATALOGUES TOWARDS A SHARABLE DATA STRATEGY

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "FROM COLLABORATIVE DATA EDITING TO LIBRARY CATALOGUES TOWARDS A SHARABLE DATA STRATEGY"

Copied!
29
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

F

ROM

C

OLLABORATIVE

D

ATA

E

DITING TO

L

IBRARY

C

ATALOGUES

– T

OWARDS A

‘S

HARABLE

D

ATA

S

TRATEGY

‘S

HARABLE

D

ATA

S

TRATEGY

FOR THE

G

EO

B

IB

P

ROJECT

Frank Binder

[email protected]

(2)
(3)

THE GEOBIB PROJECT

IN CONTEXT

(4)

A simple project typology

Considering for each project

Type 0: Do they „just“ produce a web site for

dissemination of otherwise „classical humanities“

work?

dissemination of otherwise „classical humanities“

work?

Type a: Do they apply computational methods in data

processing and/or collect digital data during the

research process?

Type b: Do they publish data or data-based results in

electronic form (interactive site, data archive)?

Type a+b: both A and B?

(5)

Local survey - 27 projects (2008-2011)

7; 26%

3; 11%

10; 37%

7; 26%

0 - web dissemination

a -digital processing

a+b

b - digital products

Bärenfänger / Binder (2012): “Research infrastructures for Digital Humanities: The local perspective.”

(6)
(7)

GeoBib, eHumanities,

and research infrastructures

Service vs. research – or – service & research

Role(s) of the disciplines?

Role(s) of the disciplines?

7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Braid_final_rot.jpg CC BY-SA 2.5

See also: Discussion of e-humanities as a “cascade of alternating role-taking in enabling each other“. In: Entrup / Binder / Lobin (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2517978.2517988

(8)

RI contributions

Putting topics and issues on the table;

raising awareness within disciplines

Instruments and strategies for solutions

Providing tools and services

Networking with people

(9)

But what does the most fantastic RI for

GeoBib look like?

… and who has it?

Computing Center?

Computing Center?

Library?

Both?

(10)
(11)

RIs: Online archival collections: fold3

(12)
(13)

Related projects

Holocaust Atlas of Lithuania

-http://holocaustatlas.lt/EN/

Bomb Sight - Mapping the World War 2 London Blitz

Bomb Sight - Mapping the World War 2 London Blitz

Bomb Census -

http://bombsight.org/

Ein Literarischer Atlas Europas

-http://www.literaturatlas.eu/

Georeferenzierte Online-Bibliographie Areallinguistik

http://www.regionalsprache.de/GOBA/Katalog.aspx

(14)

THE GEOBIB PROJECT

CURRENT STATE AND

(15)

Some numbers

July 2013

1)

:

640 texts identified as relevant

350 authors

663 places incl. 247 cities, 15 gettos, and 51 camps

663 places incl. 247 cities, 15 gettos, and 51 camps

October 2013

660 texts identified as relevant, of which 550 are at hand,

170 more to be checked

100 (draft) annotation documents, 60 of which already with

editorial revision, 30 of them in TEI/XML

540 authors

820 places

15

1) Roth, M., Schmidt, A. (2013): Zwischenbericht zur Beschaffung des Materials sowie zur Menge und zum Bearbeitungsstand der erfassten Daten. In: GeoBib Dokumentation (M3.1R-M5.1R). http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2014/10519/

(16)
(17)

Linking TEI & wiki

17

Entrup / Binder / Lobin (2013): „Extending the possibilities for collaborative work with TEI/XML through the usage of a wiki system.“ In Proceedings of DH-CASE ’13, Florence, Italy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2517978.2517988

(18)
(19)

19

Entrup / Binder / Lobin (2013): „Extending the possibilities for collaborative work with TEI/XML through the usage of a wiki system.“ In Proceedings of DH-CASE ’13, Florence, Italy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2517978.2517988

(20)

GEOBIB – TOWARDS A

(21)

What kinds of data?

Bibliographical data

Annotation documents (TEI/XML)

Annotation documents (TEI/XML)

Digital Maps

Wiki entries

Other: Images / scans, Software components

(22)

Data sharing infrastructure?

Online cataloges / journal systems

General: Electronic libraries

General: Electronic libraries

Domain-specific: Repositories / portals

GeoBib information portal

(23)

23

Draft from: Schiller, I., Entrup, B.: Systemdesign auf Basis der Anforderungsanalyse aus AP2 – Verarbeitungspipeline, Entwicklungs-prozess, Systemarchitektur, Datenbankdesign, Dokumentation. GeoBib Report M6.1R, to appear online in 2014.

(24)

Sharing bibliographical (meta)data

Variety of formats – which one do we need?

Are converters available?

Which interfaces shall we offer?

Which interfaces shall we offer?

How much do we need to know about

Formats and metadata standards from LIS

Schema Crosswalks

1)

(25)

Sharing bibliographical data:

Some responses

„… does not work automatically, would need

to manually check every entry anyway“

„Use BibTex – it‘s most common“

„Use MARC 21, MAB and GND“

(26)

Sharing

biblio-graphical

data (II)

With

eJournal

systems, s

uch as

ePrints?

(27)

Questions ahead

Are there software components (plugins for CMS etc)

that we can use?

Shall we provide our own metadata service

Shall we provide our own metadata service

or team up with a library to create a „collection“?

Licensing? What about:

Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-BY)

Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)

08.01.2014

27

(28)

Other things ahead

GeoHumanities workshop proposal submitted

for DHd 2014, Passau,

(29)

More information (in German)

Funded by:

More information (in German)

www.geobib.info

Frank Binder

Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen

Center for Media and Interactivity (ZMI)

[email protected]

References

Related documents