• No results found

Whose ethics is it anyway?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Whose ethics is it anyway?"

Copied!
35
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Whose ethics is it anyway?

New Divergent History of Research Ethics in

Transnational Education

BESA CONFERENCE

CARDIFF 2015

CHRIS GRANT

(2)

Overview

Context

History of Research Ethics

The study

(3)

Context

For students of British universities operating in Sub-Saharan Africa

there is a dichotomy between the requirements of the University

(based on ethical rationalism (Tikly and Bond, 2013)), and the

Post-Colonial cultural context in which they operate.

(4)

Context

Africa is…

chaotic

frenetic

messy

poor

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)

Context 2

African students are…

resourceful

passionate

innovative

(9)

Context 2

African students are…

resourceful

passionate

innovative

community driven

But they have…

(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)

Ethics:

Field of study or set of principles?

Or code of conduct?

Reynolds (1979) focussed on moral dilemmas faced by researchers to

focus on the principles not the process

Hammersley and Traianou (2012:34) argue that “it is rarely if ever a

matter of simply

applying

a rule,

calculating

what is best, or knowing

directly what a situation requires.

(16)

History of Research Ethics

(Israel, 2015)

1947 Nuremburg Code

1948 UN Declaration of Human Rights

1966 First institutional research committee – Wits University South Africa

1975 Helsinki Declaration

1979 Belmont Report

2005 EUREC Declaration to establish European Network or Research Ethics

Committees

(17)

History of Research Ethics

(Israel, 2015)

1947 Nuremburg Code

1948 UN Declaration of Human Rights

1966 First institutional research committee – Wits University South Africa

1975 Helsinki Declaration

1979 Belmont Report

2005 EUREC Declaration to establish European Network or Research Ethics

Committees

(18)

History of Research Ethics

Time

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

(19)

Social Science

Hammersley and Traianou (2012:36) in considering research ethics a

form of occupational ethics note that rather than emphasising the

importance of “pursue[ing] the occupational task effectively”(ie good

behaviours, which includes only doing research where the benefits

outweigh the costs) should be the focus), “the main, if not exclusive

focus, has been on how researchers should treat … people”

(20)
(21)
(22)

Africa

A different ethical context?

Ubuntu – importance of community

Ma’at – truth and justice

(23)

Africa – Research Ethics

Committees

Most research on Research Ethics comes from wealthier countries (Kass

et al, 2007)

Most countries do not have national guidelines for research ethics,

where they do exist they are focussed on biomedical research; questions

arise about their ability to the job required (Tindana and Boateng, 2008)

Kass et al (2008) found the majority of committees had no non-scientist

members (but note sample size and selection)

Kirigia et al (2005:1) argue all countries should protect citizens

(24)

Research Study

Literature Review

Focus Groups

In-depth Interviews

Alternative tool

Test tool

In-depth interviews

- Critical Incident

(25)

Research Study

Literature Review

Focus Groups

In-depth Interviews

Alternative tool

Test tool

In-depth interviews

- Critical Incident

technique

(26)

Research Study

Literature Review

Focus Groups

In-depth Interviews

Alternative tool

Test tool

In-depth interviews

- Critical Incident

technique

To develop understanding of students understanding and

application of research ethics

(27)

Research Study

Literature Review

Focus Groups

In-depth Interviews

Alternative tool

Test tool

In-depth interviews

- Critical Incident

technique

(28)

Research Study

Literature Review

Focus Groups

In-depth Interviews

Alternative tool

Test tool

In-depth interviews

- Critical Incident

technique

To test the ability of the tool to demonstrate ethical

compliance in research

Student perspective

Supervisor perspective

(29)

Research Study

Literature Review

Focus Groups

In-depth Interviews

Alternative tool

Test tool

In-depth interviews

- Critical Incident

technique

To evaluate the tool to demonstrate ethical compliance in

research

Student perspective

Supervisor perspective

(30)

Thoughts so far…

Bio-medical ethics is the “gold standard”

Yet recent Ebola outbreak and the abandonment of due process

(MRC, 2014) in medical research ethics indicates a flexible approach

Situational Ethics

(31)

One size does not fit all…

“Ethical judgement is primarily about which compromises are and are not

legitimate in the relevant context” Hammersley and Traianou (2012: 135)

Consequentialism

“The ends justify the means” (Bentham, 1789)

Rules are not absolute when violation leads to more undesirable consequences (Sen, 1979)

Israel (2015)

conduct or compliance?

Evasion

(32)

New Divergent History of

Research Ethics

Time

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

(33)

New Approach

(34)

Final thoughts…

“we have a stark choice: follow what we think is right, or

comply passively with regulatory edict” (Israel, 2015:189)

“we need therefore to generate a regulatory space where

researchers are given equal weight with ethical deliberators

rather than being reduced to acting out a set of sanctioned

behaviours.” (Israel, 2015:188)

(35)

References

Bentham, J [1789] 1907, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Available from http://www.econlib.org/library/Bentham/bnthPML.html

accessed 23/4/2015

Hammersley, M and Traianou, A, 2012 Ethics in Qualitative Research: Controversies and Contexts, London: Sage Israel, M, 2015, Research Ethics and Integrity for Social Scientists, London: Sage.

Kass, N, Hyder, AA, Ajuwon, A, Appiah-Poku, J, Barsdorf, N, Elsayed, DE, Mokhachane, M, Mupenda, B, Ndebele, P, Ndossi, G, Sikateyo, B, Tangwa, G and Tindana, P, 2007, The Structure and Function of Research Ethics Committees in Africa: A Case Study, in PLosS Medicine 4 (1):e3 available from

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040003&representation=PDF accessed 21/6/2015

Kirigia, J , Wambebe, C and Baba-Moussa, A, 2005, Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region, in BMC Medical Ethics 2005, 6:10 available from

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/6/10, accessed 21/6/2016

Medical Research Council, 2014, Ebola vaccine trials fast-tracked by international consortium, available from

http://www.mrc.ac.uk/news-events/news/ebola-vaccine-trials-fast-tracked-by-international-consortium/, accessed 19/6/2015 NASA, 2015, Earth’s Visible Lights, available from http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view.php?id=55167, accessed 21/6/2015

Reynolds, P, 1979, Ethical Dilemmas and Social Science Research, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Sen, AK, 1979, Collective Choice and Social Welfare. New York: North-Holland

Tikly, LP and Bond, TN, 2013, Towards a postcolonial research ethics in comparative and international education, in Compare: a Journal of Comparative Education, 43: 422-442 Tindana,P and Boateng, O, 2008, The Ghana Experience, in Journal of Academic Ethics, 6: 277-281

Transparency International, 2015, Corruption Perceptions Index 2014, available from http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014 accessed 18/6/2015

www.newsday.co.zw www.kitwetimes.com http://www.econlib.org/library/Bentham/bnthPML.html http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040003&representation=PDF http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/6/10, http://www.mrc.ac.uk/news-events/news/ebola-vaccine-trials-fast-tracked-by-international-consortium/, http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view.php?id=55167, http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014 http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtp058316.pdf

References

Related documents