• No results found

Preventing Corruption in Development Cooperation Checklist for Self- Evaluation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Preventing Corruption in Development Cooperation Checklist for Self- Evaluation"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Preventing Corruption in

Development Cooperation

Checklist for

Self-Evaluation

work of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in

development cooperation: funds can be leaked, project

costs can increase and those in need may see very

little of the funds donated specifically for their

bene-fit. Corruption should not, and cannot, simply be

accept-ed as an inevitable fact. Suitable measures can lead to its

effective prevention.

This ‹Checklist for Self-Evaluation› will help NGOs to

recognize the risks of corruption within their structures

and to implement necessary measures to prevent it.

The aim of the checklist is to identify areas that are

particularly prone to corruption. It can be used as a

first step by organisations wishing to develop their

own anti-corruption programme.

(2)

Table of Contents

Introduction 3

Purpose of the Checklist 4 Content, Structure and Limits of the Checklist 5

Format 6

Checklist 7

Governance 8

Human Resources 12

Finance and Accounting 16

Projects 20

Relations with Suppliers and Business Partners 22 Collaboration with Partner Organisations 26

(3)

Prevent Corporate Corruption» by Transparency International Germany, reg. Assoc., (ISBN: 978-3-9812154-6-5)

Rights of use:

This work or its content may be copied, distributed and publically made available. The following conditions apply: Identification of the holder of rights Transparency International Germany, reg. assoc., no commercial application, no modifications, editing or changes. The previous conditions can be waived only on express consent of the rights holder.

(4)

3

Introduction

Corruption is the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. Various forms of corruption are covered by this definition including the pay-ment of bribes and the misappropriation of funds, but also more subtle approaches such as nepotism.

Corrupt practices have severe consequences for the work of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in development cooperation: funds can be leaked, project costs can increase and those in need may see very little of funds donated specifically for their benefit. Apart from anything else, corruption is illegal and can have legal consequences for an NGO. Furthermore, it can tarnish an organisa-tion’s reputation.

Corruption should not, and cannot, simply be accepted as an inevitable fact. Suitable prophylactic measures can lead to its effec-tive prevention. This checklist developed by Transparency Inter-national Switzerland (TI Switzerland) and Bread for all (BFA) will help NGOs recognize the risks of corruption within their structures. It also provides advice regarding how an organisation should pre-vent corruption. The basic idea is based on an existing «Checklist for Self-Audits to Prevent Corporate Corruption» developed by TI Ger-many. The format and content have been revised and adapted to the needs of non-governmental organisations.

The checklist is an appendix to the Guidelines for NGOs, which has been created by TI Switzerland and BFA. Both documents pro-vide NGOs with guidelines for the planning, development and im-plementation of an anti-corruption programme. Accepting responsi-bility and challenging corruption in development cooperation is ultimately the decision of each organisation.

(5)

Purpose of the Checklist

The aim of the checklist is to identify areas that are particularly at risk and to detect points of weakness in the Internal Controlling System. It is principally meant as an instrument to locate risk zones prone to corruption in an organisation and can be used as a first step by organisations wishing to develop their own anti-corruption programme.

(6)

5

Content, Structure and

Limits of the Checklist

The checklist contains a selection of areas that are susceptible to corruption. The list of the subject areas is therefore not complete. Due to various factors such as size, working focus and funding, each organisation must decide which areas are particularly relevant with regard to preventing corruption, and whether it needs to evaluate additional areas.

The checklist should provide the basis for the development of a tailor-made anti-corruption programme. An individually designed programme has the advantage that it can be adapted to the needs of the organisation. It creates a transparent, legally-binding work-ing environment that facilitates the detection of irregularities and encourages the lasting success of the organisation’s work. In addi-tion, an anti-corruption programme offers behaviour guidelines to those working for the organisation, which can be applied in difficult situations. However, even a carefully designed and tailor-made anti-corruption programme cannot guarantee that anti-corruption does not occur in isolated cases. Such a programme can only aim to reduce the risk of corruption to a minimum and contribute to detecting cases of corruption in time so that the resulting damage is mini-mized.

(7)

Format

The checklist covers six subject areas: Governance, Human Resources, Finance and Accounting, Projects, Relations with Suppliers and Busi-ness Partners and Collaboration with Partner Organisations. For each subject area, a number of statements regarding measures against cor-ruption are listed. As mentioned above, these measures should be adapted by the NGO using the checklist, and extended if required.

The answers should demonstrate the extent to which an organi-sation agrees with the statements and whether or not the statements are appropriate. It is important therefore that an honest evaluation reflecting the current working situation of the NGO is provided.

(8)

Checklist

(9)

Governance

1) In your organisation there are written Operating Procedures and Codes of Conduct to fight corruption which all members of staff and partners are familiar with.

2) You do not allow the offering, providing, accepting or demand-ing of bribery payments in any form. Direct or indirect «facili-tation payments» in the form of cash payments, non-cash payments or service benefits to public officers (e.g. staff at ap-proving authorities) or staff of companies are banned. The conditions under which exceptions are possible are clearly defined.

3) There is an Internal Controlling System (ICS) implemented in your organisation.

4) Neutral examining bodies (e.g. external auditors, internal audi-tors, other organisations within a «peer review») check your organisation regularly.

5) There is an official position in your organisation (e.g. corrup-tion officer, internal auditor) which is responsible for measures against corruption.

(10)

9 strongly partly disagree not

(11)

6) Your organisation has a reporting system (e.g. whistle-blower hotline, reporting point) where your staff, as well as staff from partner organisations, can communicate anonymous reports of suspicion regarding corruption, without fear of reprisals. 7) Cases of corruption are evaluated and controlling measures to

minimize future risks are developed and implemented accor-dingly.

8) All criminally relevant cases that are detected are forwarded where possible to the law enforcement bodies responsible. 9) You ensure that important decisions (e.g. selection of project

beneficiaries) are met according to clear and understandable criteria. Decisions based on preferences regarding ethnicity, family, etc are explicitly banned.

10) Guaranteeing and providing credit to staff or partner organisa-tions as well as from partner organisaorganisa-tions to their staff are managed according to clear guidelines and are subject to ap-proval.

(12)

11 strongly partly diagree not

(13)

Human Resources

1) You have informed all your staff about the currently valid Ope-rating Procedures and Codes of Conduct, you have committed them in writing or in their working contracts to adhere to them and have established sanctions in cases of non-compliance. 2) Each member of staff can at any time and without negative

consequences refer to these procedures and guidelines, even if this leads to conflicts with superiors.

3) You regularly carry out training for staff in internal and ex-ternal guidelines and regulations.

4) Competing interests and conflicts of interests must be dis-closed. Secondary employment or external, remunerated ser-vices (e.g. publications, mandates) of staff are subject to ap-proval. This is checked periodically.

5) Staff may not at any time partake in decisions where their personal or private interests and those of the organisation could be conflicting.

(14)

13 strongly partly disagree not

(15)

6) You have clear, standardized rules for the permission and acceptance of presents, hospitality and other invitations for all members of staff at home and abroad.

7) You use clearly defined, transparent criteria and procedures in recruitment, staffing and promotion.

8) When appointing new staff, existing management staff (Executive Director, Head of Department) and staff in key positions are subjected to an integrity check (collection of references, criminal record check, etc.)

(16)

15 strongy partly disagree not

(17)

Finance and Accounts

1) Payment transactions, in particular those for presents, hospita-lity, cash purchases, commission, as well as for consultancy and audit services, are disclosed and subject to additional controls with regard to content.

2) Regular controls ensure that all members of staff involved with money transactions proceed according to the valid procedures of correct accounting.

3) All organisational units at home and abroad use the same standard and clear accounts code, and the accounts of every subsidiary are integrated into the general accounting system. 4) You use the «four-eye-principle» (or alternative controls) for

important decisions (e.g. commissioning of assignments, hand-ling of payments, recruitment)

5) Your organisation is aware of effective control and monitoring procedures (such as job rotation) in sensitive areas such as payment release.

(18)

17 strongly partly disagree not

(19)

6) Staff travel expenses are regularly checked (not just formally but also regarding content) by third parties (e.g. finance de-partment, internal audit) and not just by the superior.

7) Your organisation has recorded guidelines in writing as to how to deal with donations. These guidelines stipulate in particular how to prevent the work of the organisation being influenced by large donors.

(20)

19 strongly partly disagree not

(21)

Projects

1) Within the framework of a contextual analysis, the nature and frequency of corruption in a (potential) project country will be considered appropriately.

2) The project beneficiaries are appropriately informed about the features of projects and the extent of assistance.

3) Regarding time constraints for the spending of funds, project staff receive enough scope thus preventing them from having to spend money under pressure, ignoring irregularities or risks (the NGO is not compelled to spend all its remaining funds before a deadline).

(22)

21 strongly partly disagree not

(23)

Relations with Suppliers

and Business Partners

1) You commission work / purchase orders according to clear, ex-plicit and transparent criteria.

2) You do not allow the partial return flow of a contractual pay-ment («kickback») and the use of other ways or channels for illegal services to suppliers and other business partners and their staff.

3) Managerial staff and other members of staff are not permitted to accept financial commitments for the organisation if they are not explicitly entitled to do so.

4) When commissioning purchase orders, you ensure that there is competition among suppliers. A call for tenders and a certain quantity of suppliers who tender a bid at the same time is re-quired for orders exceeding a particular value.

5) Prior to the commissioning of an order, sufficient information about the locally accepted prices and wages are obtained (e.g. from other organisations).

(24)

23 strongly partly disagree not

(25)

6) You control the necessity and the appropriateness of subse-quent orders (in particular so-called «supplements»).

7) You carry out regular checks of contracts in all areas, also retro-spectively (contract management).

8) Contracts with suppliers and other business partners contain an anti-corruption clause which also determines possible sanctions (e.g. termination of collaboration).

9) You check that services and fees of external consultants, agents and/or experts are reasonable and according to the purpose.

(26)

25 strongly partly disagree not

(27)

Collaboration with

Partner Organisations

1) Prior to signing a contract with a partner organisation you carry out a «due diligence» check of competence and integrity, you define the service to be provided in a written contract in a clear and explicit way and commit to a payment which is ap-propriate for the legitimate service provided.

2) Contracts with partner organisations contain an anti-corrup-tion clause which also determines possible sancanti-corrup-tions (e.g. ter-mination of collaboration).

3) The partners of your organisation send you annual financial re-ports. These reports are also verified by an independent auditor when they exceed a specific annual amount.

4) Your partner organisations have an Internal Controlling System (ICS) if they exceed a specific annual budget.

5) Your partner organisations use the «four-eye-principle» (or al-ternative controls) in important decisions (e.g. commissioning of orders, payment procedures, recruitment).

(28)

27 strongly partly disagree not

(29)

6) You know the other financing sources of your partner organi-sations and know how these are used in order to be able to detect a possible double financing of your project.

7) You commit partner organisations to clear, standardized rules regarding the permission and acceptance of presents, hospita-lity and other invitations for all members of staff.

8) You ensure that important decisions in your partner organisa-tions (e.g. recruitment, selection of project beneficiaries) are taken according to clear and understandable criteria and that your partners expressly ban decisions taken due to preferences regarding ethnicity, family etc.

9) You commit partner organisations to ban the partial return flow of a contractual payment («kickback») and the use of other ways and channels for illegal services to suppliers or their staff. 10) Regular training for partner organisations regarding internal

(30)

29 strongly partly disagree not

(31)
(32)

31

Evaluation /

Self-Evaluation

Should you disagree with two or more statements or if you partly agree with more than half of the statements in one section, then there is an increased risk of corruption in that particular area. In this situation we recommend outside help for anti-corruption measures.

Should you partly agree with or disagree with less than two individual statements concerning your organisation in one section, you should pay particular attention to these areas and discuss with-in your organisation how improvements to fight and prevent cor-ruption in the area affected can be achieved. Help from outside can also help here depending on the situation.

If you would like an analysis or a basic discussion on the subject of fighting and preventing corruption, or have further questions, feel free to contact Transparency International Switzerland directly: Tel: +41 31 382 35 50 from 09:00 – 12:00

(33)

Transparency International Switzerland Schanzeneckstrasse 25 P.O. Box 8509 3001 Bern Tel. +41 31 382 35 50 Fax +41 31 382 50 44 [email protected] www.transparency.ch

Bread for all Monbijoustrasse 29 P.O. Box 5621 3001 Bern Tel. +41 31 380 65 65 Fax +41 31 380 65 64 [email protected] www.bfa-ppp.ch

(34)

Preventing Corruption in

Development Cooperation

Checklist for

Self-Evaluation

Corrupt practices have severe consequences for the

work of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in

development cooperation: funds can be leaked, project

costs can increase and those in need may see very

little of the funds donated specifically for their

bene-fit. Corruption should not, and cannot, simply be

accept-ed as an inevitable fact. Suitable measures can lead to its

effective prevention.

This ‹Checklist for Self-Evaluation› will help NGOs to

recognize the risks of corruption within their structures

and to implement necessary measures to prevent it.

The aim of the checklist is to identify areas that are

particularly prone to corruption. It can be used as a

first step by organisations wishing to develop their

own anti-corruption programme.

References

Related documents