Can They Get That Stuff?
Our Panel
Daniel Karson – Moderator
Chairman, Americas
Kroll Advisory Solutions
Michael DuBose
Managing Director and
Cyber Investigations Practice Leader
Kroll Advisory Solutions
Andrea S. Gibson
Product Director, Core Discovery Solutions
Kroll Ontrack Inc.
Brian Moroney
General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer
CRG
Michael DuBose
Managing Director and
Cyber Investigations Practice Leader
Kroll Advisory Solutions
SOCIAL NETWORKS
» YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace
Two Evidence Types
1. Public Data: data mining, web crawlers; commercial databases.
2. Non-Public information: production must be compelled through legal process.
Compelled Disclosure
Stored Communications Act
» 18 U.S.C. §§2701-12 (Title II of the Electronic Communications
and Privacy Act)
Statutory privacy rights for customers and subscribers of Internet communication service providers like Comcast (ISP) and Facebook
Two Types of Service Providers
» Electronic Communications Services (ECS): transmission
» Remote Computing Services (RCS): storage
Compelling Production (Govt.)
The type of judicial process needed is determined by
the nature of data sought:
» Subpoena - subscriber records; unopened e-mail older than 180 days, w/notice; opened e-mail, w/notice.
» 18 U.S.C. §2703(d) Order - subscriber and transactional records;
opened e-mail w / notice; unopened e-mail older than 180 days, w / notice.
» Search Warrant - content of communications, no matter how old, whether opened or unopened.
Significant Cases Establishing Greater 4
thAmendment Protections
Theofel v. Farey-Jones, 359 F3d 1066 (9
thCir. 2004):
Expansive definition of what is considered to be “in
electronic storage.”
» Search Warrant now needed for opened communications, including
e-mail, less than 180 days old; previously could obtain through subpoena w/notice.
United States v. Warshak, 532 F3d 521(6
thCir. 2008):
reasonable expectation of privacy for ALL e-mails stored
on third party servers; 4
thAmendment protections apply.
» Search Warrant needed for ALL stored communications, opened or
unopened, however long stored: previously could use subpoena to obtain unretrieved communications older than 180 days.
Current Practice (Criminal)
Subpoena:
subscriber records (name, address, length and typeof service, means of payment – include credit card or bank account number)
2703(d) Order
:
subscriber and transactional records(account logs, temporary historical IP addresses)
Search Warrant
:
content of all communications (e.g.,e-mails, messages, Tweeting, chat logs)
Civil
Public service providers may freely disclose
customers’ non-content records to any person other
than the government
Basic rules of evidence apply
Subpoena duces tecum served on ISP or social
network for non-content records (e.g., subscriber and
log-in information)
Party’s consent is required for content (including
private messaging), but can be compelled by court if
relevant to litigation and narrowly tailored
Andrea S. Gibson
Product Director, Core Discovery Solutions
Kroll Ontrack Inc.
Discussion Overview
Why Care?
Case Law & Legislation
Challenges Posed by Social Media
Why Care?
Why Care?
(1.) … It’s what we do.
Social media use is
becoming increasingly
pervasive in our society
Americans spent 22.7% of
their time online using social
networking sites and blogs as
of June 2010
» Represents a 43% increase from
June 2009
Internet Usage
Other Activities Social Media/BlogsThe Nielsen Company,
http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/what-americans-do-online-Why Care?
(1.) … It’s what we do.
Mimecast survey: 85 percent of employees under age 25 –
“Generation Gmail” - send work-related documents and email
from personal email accounts.
Cyberoam survey: extracted and collaged information from
linkedin, Facebook and Twitter accounts of employees from 20
companies, in various industries and six countries.
» Salary and cash flow issues,
» Employees were looking for new jobs,
» Premature broadcasts of: launches, conferences, quarterly earning calls and financials
Mimecast’s survey was conducted by Loudhouse, which conducted 2,400 online interviews with corporate email users around the world
Why Care?
(2.) … Corporate Utility
80% of Fortune Global 100 companies use
some form of social media
Most used:
60% 54% 50% Twitter Facebook YouTubeWhy Care?
(2.) Corporate Utility
Majority of companies surveyed
saw demonstrated value in using
the medium to drive business and
customer relations
16
Source: Cyance, “Social Media in Business Census 2011”. Available at,
http://www.cyance.com/rsc/2011CyanceIDMSocialMediaCensus.pdf.
Why Care?
(3.) … It’s growing & evolving….
Social media is predicted to
replace
e-mail as
the dominant form of communication by 2014
» Gartner Predicts Social Networking to Overtake E-Mail,Why Care?
(4.) …. Significant security threats
2008, virus named “Koobface” hit Facebook
and quickly spread
» Sent messages to infected users’ friends with a
clickable link, directing web traffic to contaminated sites
18
2011, Twitter reached a settlement with the FTC regarding
charges it failed to safeguard users’ personal information
» Lapses in Twitter’s data security led to access of non-public user
information and ability to send out phony tweets
11/30/2011, Facebook reached a settlement with the FTC
regarding “privacy breaches”
» Deceived consumers by telling them they could keep their information on Facebook private, and then repeatedly allowing it to be shared and made public
Why Care?
(5.) … Litigation & investigations
My boss is a complete
crook. No joke.
LOL – My company is full of crooks
Information on social media can be relevant
evidence in an investigation/trial
20
Why Care?
(5.) … Litigation & investigations
Jury Selection: Info for Voir Dire
Jury Instructions:
Summer 2010, the Judicial Conference Committee on
Court Administration and Case Management developed
a set of model jury instructions regarding the use of
digital devices and social media.
»
“You may not communicate with anyone about the case on your cell
phone, through e-mail, Blackberry, iPhone, text messaging, or on
Twitter, through any blog or website, through any internet chat
room, or by way of any other social networking websites, including
Facebook, My Space, LinkedIn, and YouTube.”
Why Care?
Why Care?
(6.) …. Lawyers are social creatures, too
22
2009, the Florida Board of Bar Examiners adopted rules
requiring Bar applicants to
give the Board full access to all
social media accounts
in the following situations:
Applicants required to establish rehabilitation under Rule 3-13
Applicants with a history of substance abuse/dependence
Applicants with “significant candor concerns”
Applicants with a history of unlicensed practice of law allegations;
Applicants who have worked as a certified legal intern, reported
self-employment in a legal field, or reported employment as an
attorney pending admission
Discoverability: Of course
it is….
»
Information contained on social
media is ESI, and therefore
generally discoverable
24
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) permits
discovery of electronically stored information (ESI)
“regarding any non-privileged matter that is
relevant to any party’s claim or defense.”
Discoverability:
“Private” is still public
Social media discovery
disputes often focus on
this distinction
Most courts have so far
considered “private”
material within the scope
of discovery
»
Must be relevant to the
matter
Private
Discoverability:
Social Media as Evidence
Court ordered production of data from Facebook
and MySpace account:
privacy is “wishful
thinking”
» Romano v. Steelcase Inc., 907 N.Y.S.2d 650 (Sept. 21, 2010).
Plaintiff ordered to preserve existing information
on MySpace and Facebook:
provide user names
and passwords to opposing counsel
» McMillen v. Hummingbird Speedway, Inc., No. 113-2010 CD (C.P. Jefferson Sept. 9, 2010).
Court finds private portions of Facebook and
MySpace accounts to be “fair game”:
orders
production of user names and passwords
» Zimmerman v. Weis Markets, Inc., No. CV-09-1535 (C.P. Northumberland May 19, 2011).
Discoverability:
Stored Communications Act
Prohibits
» Electronic Communication Service (ECS) and
» Remote Computing Service (RCS) providers
From:
» Knowingly divulging the contents of
» A communication
» It stores
Unless the divulgence is
» To an intended recipient of such communication or
» Express permission from the sender is obtained
Plaintiff moved to quash
subpoenas for private information
and communications contained on
his social networking site accounts.
Court found that with respect to
private messages, social networking
sites acted as both ECS and RCS
providers, and the SCA prohibited
disclosure of privately stored
information.
-Crispin v. Audigier, Inc., 2010 WL 2293238 (C.D. Cal. May 26, 2010).
Discoverability:
Stored Communications Act
Discoverability: Production
The Case for Cooperation
Job of counsel “to make judgment calls – in good
faith and consistent with their obligations as
officers of the court – about what information is
responsive to another party’s discovery requests.
Discovery is intended to be a self-regulating
process that depends on the reasonableness
and cooperation of counsel
.”
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Simply Storage Management, LLC, 270 F.R.D. 430 (S.D. Indiana 2010).
If counsel
doesn’t cooperate
Court may allow opposing
counsel to access and review
information contained in social
networking accounts
Or
…
Judge may step in and review
the information
Judge offered to
“friend” witnesses to
review photographs and
related comments in
camera.
– Barnes v. CUS Nashville, LLC, 2010 WL 2265668 (M.D.
Tenn. June 3, 2010).
Discoverability: Production
The Case for Cooperation
Challenges Posed by Social Media
(1.) Preservation
(2.) Collection
Challenge:
Preservation
All the discovery obligations apply,
including the duty to preserve
Problems…
»
Changes very frequently
»
Stored on third-party servers
»
Security and privacy settings block
access
»
Few reliable technologies available for
social media preservation
Challenge:
Preservation
LOL – My company is full of crooks
Issue litigation holds to third-party service
providers asap if litigation is anticipated so the
evidence might be preserved
How do you preserve social media that is stored in the
cloud by a third party service provider?
Danger!
Collection
Other than what might be located in
browser cache files, social media data
is retained by the social media service
provider (e.g., MySpace, Facebook,
Twitter, etc.)
»
If you try to get it without the consent of
the owner (e.g. - found password?) your
actions may violate federal (and state)
wiretapping laws (“Title III” - 18 U.S.C.
§§ 2510-2522)
What to do
Collection
Capture publicly viewable information
»
Investigators can freely search and extract
information from an open, public page
»
Capturing software is preferred method in
recording user’s internet activities by
investigators
Enlist the help of an investigator or
service provider
Ethical Challenges:
Social Media
“False friending”
» New York State Bar Association; Formal Opinion 2010-2: A lawyer
may not attempt to gain access to a social networking website under false pretenses, either directly or through an agent
– Sept. 2010, Opinion 843: lawyer representing a client in pending
litigation may access public pages of another party’s social networking website to obtain possible impeachment material
» Philadelphia Bar Association Professional Guidance Committee –
Ethics Opinion No. 2009-02
– Opinion held that an attorney must disclose his true intentions when attempting to access social media, noting other ethical rules prohibit attorneys from engaging in dishonesty, fraud, deceit or
misrepresentation
Ethical Challenges:
Advertising via Social Media
Many states have requirements for lawyer advertising, most of
which are not Twitter, etc. friendly. e.g.,:
» Filing with a reviewing authority prior to publication;
» Labels such as “Attorney Advertising” at the beginning and end of each
message;
» Inclusion of disclaimer language; and
» Retention of copies of each advertisement.
Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility: LinkedIn
Ethical Challenges:
Lawyer as Social Creatures
The Florida Bar reprimanded
and fined an attorney
$1,200 for violating ethics
rules:
Attorney wrote on
courthouse blog that the
judge was an “evil, unfair
witch” with an “ugly,
condescending attitude”
Ethical Challenges:
Lawyer as Social Creatures
Galveston, Texas. State court,
Judge Criss:
A lawyer asked for a
continuance due to her
father’s death.
Oops! The lawyer had earlier
posted a string of status
updates on Facebook,
detailing her week of drinking,
going out and partying.
Managing Social Media
Proprietary and Confidential
What to do?
Gartner advises against banning social media,
except in a very small percentage of cases where (1.)
faced with security risks or (2.) clear regulation.
» Social Media Governance: An Ounce of Prevention (December 17, 2010).
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
issued Regulatory Notice 10-06 in January 2010
» Firms regulated by Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 must ensure they can retain social media communications as
Managing Social Media:
Best Practices
Organizations should:
»
Control access
»
Monitor usage
»
Articulate clear policies
»
Ensure understanding
»
Update, disseminate and
make information
accessible
42
Onus is on organizations to set policies regarding
use in the workplace
Managing Social Media:
Usage Policies
Develop a social media policy that clearly
identifies what is and is not acceptable
No “one size fits all” approach
Policy reflects both corporate culture and law;
Must understand:
» Your company’s brand,» Tolerance for dissent and risk,
» Relationship with workforce and
Possible policy elements include:
» Clear guidelines on proper social media use» Consequences of non-compliance
» Employee training
» Specifics on what employees can and cannot divulge
44
Managing Social Media:
Usage Policies
Employee education and awareness are critical
» Best policies are useless if employees aren’t aware or don’t
understand them
» Translation to electronic space not always intuitive
Expect and plan for a crisis
» Identify a team and a plan before disaster strikes
Managing Social Media:
Parting Thoughts & Questions
Proprietary and Confidential
Think!
Sorry, Grandma. If you
wouldn’t divulge something
in normal conversation to
your grandmother or boss,
don’t share it online.
Data never dies. In the
world of social media,
conversations live on
forever, so it’s especially
important to practice prudent
posting!
48
Brian Moroney
General Counsel and Chief
Compliance Officer
CRG
Social Media
Forms of electronic communications through
which users create online communities to share
information, ideas, personal messages and other
content.
Quora
YouTube
Glassdoor
www.colemanrg.com 50
Benefits of Social Media Policy
• Avoid legal pitfalls in hiring and employment
decisions;
• Limit the disclosure of confidential
information;
• Minimize reputational issues;
• Ensure compliance with the law; and
• Protect employees’ privacy
Social Media: Hiring Considerations
• Should you review social media when making hiring decisions?
– How:
• Password sharing
• Friending someone at the employer • Login during the interview
• Issues:
– May come across information relating to an applicant’s protected status (e.g., race, age, sexual orientation).
– Illegal in some states: Maryland passed a law, which takes effect on October 12, 2012, to prohibit an employer from requesting or requiring an applicant or employee to “disclose any user name, password, or other means for accessing a personal account or service through” a computer or similar device. Md. S.B. 433 (2012).
• Hiring decision made without reliance on such information (but while in its possession) could be problematic.
• Tip: If you are going to review social media (including through requesting
passwords) before making hiring decisions, have an impartial third party gather and “scrub” any information relating to an applicant’s protected status.
www.colemanrg.com 52
Social Media Employee Monitoring
• Issues
– Advisable to monitor
• How to monitor: Publicly available information is easier to
monitor than password-protected information.
• Passwords. If you are going to ask for login information from
employees, do not pressure or use subterfuge. See Pietrylo v.
Hillstone Rest. Grp., No. 06-5754, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
108834 (D.N.J. July 24, 2008). Password protected site that
included only colleagues and no managers, complained
about work. Managers learned of site and requested a
password from an employee, who testified that she felt
pressured to provide the password. Company was found to
violate the Stored Communications Act (and a parallel state
statute).
Social Media Monitoring
• New York Labor Law §201-d
– Limits employers ability to terminate for certain off-duty
activities
• Political activities – courts have narrowly construed to essentially cover use of social media to run for office, advocate for a
candidate, or political fundraising only.
• Recreational activities – lawful, leisure time activities for which the employee receives no compensation and which is generally
engaged in for recreational purposes, including, but not limited to, sports, games, hobbies, exercise, reading and the viewing of
television, movies and similar material.
• NOTE: Any use of social media DURING WORK HOURS,
ON WORK PREMISES, OR ON WORK EQUIPMENT are
outside the scope of this statute.
Social Media Employee Monitoring
• If you know or have reason to know of risk or
potentially illegal behavior, you may have a
duty to act. See Doe v. XYC Corp., 887 A.2d
1156 (N.J. Super. 2005).
– Court found that company (i) had reason to
believe employee was using work computer to
store child pornography, (ii) did not react properly,
and held company responsible for the activities of
one of its employees.
Potential Legal Pitfalls
• State law issues (See, e.g., NY )• NLRA
– Union activity, discussions of terms and conditions of employment.
• Whistleblower statutes
– Does the posting get protection from any relevant whistleblower statutes?
• Legal off-duty activities
– In some states, it is illegal to terminate someone for legal, off-duty activity.
• Political activities or affiliations
– Tends to be narrowly construed to running for office.
• Stored Communications Act
– Unauthorized access to email/social media
• References or recommendations (LinkedIn)
– Consider prohibition or having an approval process
Marketing Through Social Media
• Federal Trade Commission: Section 5 of the FTC Act
requires disclosure of a material connection between an
advertiser and endorser when the relationship is not
apparent to consumers, which includes bloggers and other
social media. 16 C.F.R. § 255 (2009).
• Earlier this month, the FTC fined Spokeo $800,000, in part,
due to fake endorsements. The FTC alleged that Spokeo
employees posed as customers of Spokeo and posted
reviews of the service. U.S. v. Spokeo Inc., Case No.
cv12-05001 (C.D. Cal. 2012).Guidelines:
– Adopt guidelines that comply with the law;
– Train employees appropriate; and
– Monitor their adherence to the policy.
Model Social Media Policy
Introduction
This social media policy applies to social networking sites, personal web pages, personal space provided by Internet providers and Internet presence (such as LinkedIn©, Facebook©, Twitter© and MySpace©) which make available personal views to the public or facilitate conversations over the Internet. This includes platforms such as YouTube ©, Flickr™, blogs and wikis.
The Company reserves the right to monitor compliance with this policy and its online reputation and take disciplinary action, including termination of employment, for violations of this policy.
As always, the use of common sense is the easiest way to ensure compliance with this policy.
Professional Use of Social Media
For any such websites that are used for professional purposes, you must maintain a separate professional profile for these purposes. This professional profile should include only professional information, such as the Company as your employer and your education information.
Use of your Company email address is use of the Company’s information system. Therefore, personal posts on external social media must be generated from a personal email account. This means, for example, you must not use your Company email address for your personal Facebook© profile. However, you may use your Company email address for a site associated with your official job responsibilities (e.g., a site associated with a professional/industry association or on sites where you have a separate, professional profile as discussed above).
Model Social Media Policy
Be Aware of Your Legal Obligations
When engaging in social media, you are expected to respect and adhere to all applicable laws and regulations, including those concerning financial reporting, insider trading, antitrust, copyright, anti-bribery and data protection.
Do not reveal any confidential or material non-public information, including, but not limited to, client names, project interests, contract terms, or sales figures.
Non-Disparagement
Avoid using these sites to make defamatory comments about, or to bring disrepute to, the Company, its employees, or clients. Remember that you are speaking publicly when you are posting on social media, and anything that brings damage to the Company or its reputation will ultimately be your responsibility. If you are unsure about a particular circumstance, please discuss with your manager or senior management before posting the comments.
With respect to any personal profiles or postings, if you make reference to your employment at the Company, please be certain to include a disclaimer that “the views contained in these web pages are my personal views and do not
represent the views of Coleman Research Group.” In addition, if you reference the Company in any social media, you must disclose that you work for the Company before you make any such reference.
EMPLOYEE SIGNATURE DATE
Online Resources
•
www.acc.com
– interesting articles and
discussions
• Social Media Governance has a database of
social media policies. Available at:
http://socialmediagovernance.com/policies.p
hp
60 Proprietary and Confidential