• No results found

9/19/2014. Facility Design with the Patients at the Center. Learning Objectives: A remarkable project

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "9/19/2014. Facility Design with the Patients at the Center. Learning Objectives: A remarkable project"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

morris switzer e n v i r o n m e n t s f o r h e a l t h

Facility Design with the Patients at the Center

Christine A. Schon, MPA, FACMPE VP Community Group Practices

Dartmouth-Hitchcock

Jennifer R. Arbuckle, AIA, LEED AP Partner

MorrisSwitzer ~ Environments for Health

Learning Objectives:

• Demonstrate the benefits & efficiencies of modular planning in project size and layout

• Identify efficiencies in cost & operation

• Review benefits of multi-disciplinary approach to care & applications in the Medical Home Model

• Describe the process for engaging physicians and staff in changing culture.

A physician champion

Leadership was able to foster creativity in an entire organization and drive consensus.

A completely re-engineered approach

From the parking lot to the bathrooms, how can we make this the best possible process?

An unusual building

80 providers in one building yet…

A remarkable project

• There are no boundaries between practice types • Every exam room is identical

(2)

■ Collaborative Practice Models Drive Efficiencies in Facility Design: Planning, Operations, and Costs

■ Challenges, Issues, Changes

■ Lessons Learned: The Case Study

Overview

Collaborative Practice Models:

Planning

Operations

Costs

 Healthcare Regulatory changes…

 Legislative drivers

 Reimbursement models

 Demonstrated efficiency requirements

Drivers of Change

(3)

Consolidated Location

Greater efficiency and collegiality through consolidation of practices/buildings.

Medical Home Model

A primary care team, led by the physician, working collaboratively to address the acute, chronic and preventative needs of patients.

Multi-Disciplinary Practice

Patient and staff benefits of placing primary care and specialists into a single building.

A New Practice Model

The Practice Model

Key Elements

Teamwork

Care Coordination

Population Health Metrics

Data registry coordination

Electronic Health Record

NCQA Certification

Medical Home Model

The Practice Model

Multi-Disciplinary Approach

Key Elements

Patient-Centered Care

Standard approached crossing disciplines & specialties

Care Navigation

Examples:

•Abnormal Mammogram

•Colon Cancer

•Hypertension

•Falls in the elderly

(4)

The Iterative Process

Steering Team Makeup

User Group Meetings

From Individual Needs to Departmental Needs to Collaborative Needs

The Practice Model

• Reflect our Mission and Vision?

• Enhance the true benefit of a collaborative group practice?

• Reflect our commitment to patient centered care?

• Promote “green principles”?

• Enhance the concept of a “Medical Home”?

Questions Explored during design process

How will our new facility…

The Practice Model

concepts

simple clean healing

organic natural timeless

connection to site

connection to community

(5)

Two Focus Groups DH patients non-DH patients the project Tools of Communication the blog

• Reflect our Mission and Vision?

• Enhance the true benefit of a collaborative group practice?

• Reflect our commitment to patient centered care?

• Promote “green principles”?

• Enhance the concept of a “Medical Home”?

Questions Explored on the Blog

How will our new facility…

(6)

No. Unit Area Net SF Notes Space

Exam Room 6 130 780 Large Treatment Room 1 150 150 MD Office 3 150 450 Office Manager 1 100 100 Business Office 2 80 160 2 workstations Nurse Work Area 1 150 150 Medical Records 1 150 150 Reception/Scheduling 2 60 120 2 stations Staff Break Room 1 150 150 Supplies/Storage 1 60 60 Waiting Area 10 20 200 10-12 people Toilet Rooms 3 50 150 2 patient/1 staff Housekeeping Coset 1 60 60 Data Closet 1 60 60

Sub-Total (DNSF) 2,740DNSF 1.4 Grossing Factor Total (DGSF) 3,836DGSF

Traditional MOB Functional Space Programming 3-Provider Suite

No. Unit Area Net SF Notes Space

Exam Room 10 110 1100 Large Exam Room 2 130 260 Treatment Room 1 150 150 Phlebotomy Station 1 120 120 1 draw station MD/Pract Offices 6 120 720 Offices 2 120 240 Prac Mgr, Billing Nurse Work Areas 6 60 360 Decentralized Nurse Station 1 100 100 Central Vital Sign Stations 3 40 120 Toilet Rooms 6 50 300 4 patient/2 staff Clean Utility 1 80 80 Soiled Utility 1 80 80 Supply Storage 1 100 100 Reception/Scheduling 4 80 320 Private booths Admin Work Area 1 80 80 Copier, Printer, Sup Staff Break/Conference 10 20 200 10-12 people Waiting Area 15 20 300 15-20 people Housekeeping Closet 1 60 60 Data Closet 1 60 60 Med Records Storage 1 100 100 Sub-Total (DNSF) 4,850DNSF

1.4 Grossing Factor Total (DGSF) 6,790DGSF No.

Unit Area Net SF Notes Space

Exam Room 20 110 2200 Large Exam Room 2 130 260 Treatment Room 2 150 300 Phlebotomy Station 2 120 240 2 draw station MD/Pract Offices 12 120 1440 Offices 3 120 360 Prac Mgr, Billing Nurse Work Areas 12 60 720 Decentralized Nurse Station 2 100 200 Central Vital Sign Stations 6 40 240 Toilet Rooms 8 50 400 5 patient/3 staff Clean Utility 2 80 160 Soiled Utility 2 80 160 Supply Storage 2 100 200 Reception/Scheduling 8 80 640 Private booths Admin Work Area 1 150 150 Copier, Printer, Sup Staff Break/Conference 15 20 300 15-20 people Waiting Area 25 20 500 25-30 people Housekeeping Closet 1 80 80 Data Closet 1 80 80 Med Records Storage 1 200 200 Sub-Total (DNSF) 8,830DNSF

1.4 Grossing Factor Total (DGSF)12,362DGSF

6-Provider Suite 12-Provider Suite

Space Programs for Traditional Medical Suite design:

Traditional MOB Functional Space Programming New Area Notes Individual Practices

Family Practice 12,000 12 providers Internal Medicine 7,000 6 providers

Oncology 4,000 3 providers

OB/Gyn 4,000 3 providers

General Surgeons 12,000 9 providers Gastroenterologists 4,000 3 providers

Pediatrics 4,000 3 providers

Urologists 3,000 2 providers

Building Areas (general):

Vertical Circulation 600 2 Stairwells, 2 Elevators

Mechanical 400

Electrical 200

Maintenance Space 200

Sub-Total (DGSF) 51,400Departmental Gross Square Feet 1.20 Estimated DGSF to BGSF Total (BGSF) 61,680Building Gross Square Feet

TOTAL No. of Providers = 41 +/- 1,500 SF per provider

Functional Space Program for Traditional Building area:

Traditional MOB Design

(7)

Collaborative Model Functional Space Programming

No. Unit Area Net SF Notes Practice Space

Exam Room 82 120 9,840 2 rooms per provider Consult Room 14 120 1,640 1 per 6 exam rooms Procedure Room 10 220 2,255 1 per 8 exam rooms Xray Room 1 400 400 Includes Control Room Cast/Splint Room 1 300 300 2 positions + storage Reception/CheckIn/CheckOut 16 50 820 4 positions per 20 exam rooms Clinical Patient Toilets 8 50 410 1 per 10 exam rooms Staff Work Area (On-Stage) 36 40 1,440 Open, touchdown area, per provider Staff Work Area (Off-Stage) 36 40 1,440 Semi-private area; per provider Public Patient Toilets 8 50 410 1 per 10 seats waiting Waiting Area 82 20 1,640 1 per exam room Soil Utility 4 80 328 Soiled Linens, Trash, Recycle Clean Supply 4 80 328 Clean Supplies, Linens Staff Kitchen 4 60 246 Refrigerator, microwave, coffeemaker Staff Toilet 4 50 205

Staff Lockers 4 80 328 Env Services Closet 4 60 246 Mop Sink Tel/Data Closet 4 60 246

Sub-Total (DNSF) 22,522Departmental Net Square Feet 1.40 Estimated Net to Gross Factor

Total (DGSF) 31,531Departmental Gross Square Feet

Notes:

1. See Common Areas program sheet for shared spaces in building. 2. Support spaces (Soiled Util thru Elec Closet) calculated at approx 1 per 20 exam rooms. 3. Actual or projected Provider counts needed for on-stage/off-stage work areas.

TOTAL No. of Providers = 41

Space Program for Collaborative Practice areas:

Collaborative Model Functional Space Programming

TOTAL No. of Providers = 41

Space Program for Collaborative Practice Building area:

New AreaNotes Department Name

Provider Space 31,53141 providers

Centralized Building Areas:

Entry Vestibule 200

Main Greeting/Reception Desk 150

Main Lobby 400

Public Toilets 200

Large Conference Rm 400

Telehealth Suite 250

Shared Decision Room 200

Nurse Clinic Area 400

Stairwells 4002 @ 200 SF each

Elevators 2002 @ 100 SF each

Elevator Machine Room 150

Security Central 100

Mechanical Room 600

Env Services Central 120

Tel/Data Closet Central 80

Electrical Room 200

Sub-Total (DGSF) 35,581Departmental Gross Square Feet 1.2 Estimated DGSF to BGSF Total (BGSF) 42,697Building Gross Square Feet

+/- 1,000 SF per provider

Design Concept

(8)

Cost Comparisons

Project Cost Analysis:

Traditional Design 62,000 SF

Delta in Building Area = 19,000 SF

x Construction Cost psf of $250

Projected Construction Cost Savings =

$4.75M

Extended Project Cost Savings =

$7M

Modular Design 43,000 SF

Potential Operational Savings:

 Reduced SF results in Staff & Material savings for Environmental Services & Building Maintenance

 Reduced SF results in HVAC & Electrical savings over time

 Standardized room design results in streamlined use, inventory (stocking), furniture/equipment selection, etc.

 Reduced, non-replicated, supply rooms & standardized inventory results in less waste and over-stocking

 Reduced number of exam, consult, procedure room, staff work areas results in less IT spending

Cost Comparisons

Challenges

Issues

Changes

(9)

Challenges, Issues, Changes

Primary Focus is the Patient Experience

 How do you engage the patient? • Entering the Facility • In Reception Areas • The Clinical Experience • Support Services • Community Destination

How do you consolidate three sites?

 Services to be considered:

• Facilities and Environmental services • Patient Access Centers

• Scheduling, Health Information, Financial Counseling

• Registration & Insurance Processes

• Ancillary Services / Single Site / Full Service Multi-Specialty Practice

• Management

Operational Challenges & Considerations:

Challenges, Issues, Changes

Physicians

 Desire to maintain the status quo & design by department

 Physician office and work spaces

• Learn to work in new technologically based environment • On space, shoulder to shoulder with staff & patients

Staff

 Efficient team structure through co-location of like services

 Gaining new efficiencies with same staffing levels

New Services

 Incorporate external entities that support practice

 Maximize efficiency of space utilization (part-time services)

 Space for traveling providers

Operational Challenges & Considerations:

Challenges, Issues, Changes

Flow by “Bubble”

 Co-location of similar services by floor (Primary Care, Specialties, Ancillaries)

 Overlapping of services by floors

 Build flexible clinical space to accommodate 75% performance of surgical specialties / match surgical specialties to clinics

 Facilitates cross-training between clinical departments

Multi-Functional Rooms

 Modularity facilitates change in space

 Spaces designed for multiple uses

 Prepare for different care delivery models • Telehealth / Telemedicine • Group Medical Appointments • Nurse visits

• Support Services – Behavioral Health, Nutrition, Social Services

Operational Changes:

(10)

Challenges, Issues, Changes

Design (planning) models allowing for future design-related or operational model changes/adaptations = flexibility

Lessons Learned:

The Case Study

morris switzer

e n v i r o n m e n t s f o r h e a l t h

(11)

■ 220,000 Population of Greater Nashua, NH

■ 70,000 Patients served by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Nashua

■ 225,000 Visits per year

■ $115M Annual Revenues

■ 90 Physicians and associate providers

■ 400 Full and Part Time Staff

Some numbers…

About D-H Nashua

Design Principles

■ Extension of DHMC in Nashua

• Reflecting our Mission, Vision, and Values

■ Quality, Access, Environmentally Responsive

• Professional, light, “green”

■ Patient-centered

• Welcoming, easy to navigate

■ Promoting Teamwork and Medical Home

• Adjacent workspaces

■ Flexible/Efficient

The Project

(12)

Level 3

Level 2

(13)

Ground Floor

Typical Room Layout

(14)

Exam Areas

Infusion

(15)

Provider Work Space

Office Area with Lounge

(16)

Admitting

Interior Stairs

(17)

Signage Depicting D-H Nashua History

Ceiling Detail

(18)

Wayfinding through Signage & Monitors

Naturally Lit Waiting Area

(19)

Communications

Timeline

■ 2003 Purchase of land at Exit 8

■ June 2009 Trustee approval to proceed Selection of architects

■ Feb. 2010 City of Nashua approves project; Construction managers hired

■ May 2010 Groundbreaking ceremony

■ Nov. 2011 Completion of construction on time under budget

(20)

morris switzer e n v i r o n m e n t s f o r h e a l t h Christine A. Schon, FACMPE Vice President, Community Practice Groups

[email protected] dartmouth-hitchcock.org

(603) 629-1120

Jennifer R. Arbuckle, AIA, LEED AP Partner

[email protected] Morrisswitzer.com

References

Related documents

If the root face in the subjacent fundamental dissection is a fundamental quadrangle, and we are adding s vertices on the external boundary, we have (s + 1) ways to choose the

Characterization of fuses for application under high di/dt Coffee and dialogue break, visit to the exhibition.. Presenter of the conference

The European student questionnaire would comprise items that addressed students’ perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors in relation to five specific European-related civics

obitelji (odrasli u braku, djeca iz dvoroditeljskih obitelji) procjenjuju pozitivnije nego osobe za koje se smatralo da dolaze iz drugih oblika obitelji (odrasli koji nisu u

necessary funds to meet the maintenance requirement or have a written confirmation in the endorsement letter, unless the main applicant already had leave as an Innovator or Start-up

Dinah Maygarden at the University of New Orleans Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences: [email protected] or 504- 280-1374 for more details and to obtain an application

In my first series of experiments, I measured the aggregation behavior response of a group of bed bugs from one life stage to the fecal extract of male, female or fifth instars

O menor índice de efeito destino (Tabela 1) obtido pelo Brasil (1,67%) possibilitou inferir que as suas exportações estão crescendo a taxas maiores que a média do mercado mundial,