• No results found

Sustainability Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Sustainability Report"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Sustainability Report

Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust

As at 30 September, 2021

(2)

Reduction in exposure

75.2%

Reduced Emissions Exposure

1

Emissions exposure as at 30 September, 2021

Please see “Sustainability Data Description and Disclosures” for additional information. MSCI data © MSCI 2021, all rights reserved.

100.0%

Reduction in exposure

To n s CO

2

e /millio n sale s

127

32

-10 10 30 50 70 90 110 130 150

MSCI World ex Australia Index Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust

106

0

-10 10 30 50 70 90 110 130 150

MSCI World ex Australia Index Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust POTENTIAL EMISSIONS FROM RESERVES

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INTENSITY

Me ga to n s CO

2

(3)

20%

23%

42%

14%

0%

13%

19%

40%

22%

7%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Most Sustainable Above Average Average Below Average Least Sustainable Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust MSCI World ex Australia Index

Weight Distribution by Sustainability Score

As at 30 September, 2021

• The portfolio holds a greater weight than the broad market in companies with high and above-average

sustainability scores.

• The portfolio holds a lesser weight than the broad market in companies with low or below-average

sustainability scores.

DIMENSIONAL GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY TRUST VS. MSCI WORLD EX AUSTRALIA INDEX

(4)

Sector Allocations

3

As at 30 September, 2021

Holdings are subject to change and are exclusive of cash. Numbers may not total 100% due to rounding.

DIMENSIONAL GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY TRUST PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS

Information Technology 20.3%

Financials 15.8%

Industrials 13.6%

Consumer Discretionary 12.9%

Health Care 12.7%

Communication Services 8.7%

Consumer Staples 5.5%

Materials 4.4%

Real Estate 3.9%

Energy 1.1%

Utilities 1.1%

Other —

(5)

Weight Distribution by Sustainability Score

As at 30 September, 2021

ENERGY

UTILITIES

MATERIALS 51%

18% 30%

1% 0%

5% 21%

54%

14% 6%

Most Sustainable Above Average Average Below Average Least Sustainable

Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust MSCI World ex Australia Index

44% 33%

23%

0% 0%

6% 19%

45%

23% 7%

Most Sustainable Above Average Average Below Average Least Sustainable

Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust MSCI World ex Australia Index

24% 35% 37%

4% 0%

12% 21% 32% 25%

9%

Most Sustainable Above Average Average Below Average Least Sustainable

Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust

MSCI World ex Australia Index

(6)

Weight Distribution by Sustainability Score

5

As at 30 September, 2021

Please see “Sustainability Data Description and Disclosures” for additional information. The sustainability score of each company is created by Dimensional. This sustainability score takes into consideration each company’s greenhouse gas emissions and other sustainability criteria defined by Dimensional as further described in “Sustainability Considerations”. Within the portfolio’s target market, region, and industry, each company is classified from Most Sustainable to Least Sustainable. The Most Sustainable group is defined as approximately the 10% of companies with the highest sustainability scores. The Above Average is defined as the next 20%; Average is defined as the next 40%; Below Average is defined as the next 20%; and the Least Sustainable group is defined as approximately the 10% of companies with the lowest sustainability scores within the target market. MSCI data © MSCI 2021, all rights reserved.

INDUSTRIALS

CONSUMER STAPLES

CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY

HEALTH CARE 0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

90%

Most Sustainable

Above Average

Average Below Average Least Sustainable Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust MSCI World ex Australia Index

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

90%

Most Sustainable

Above Average

Average Below Average Least Sustainable Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust MSCI World ex Australia Index

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

90%

Most Sustainable

Above Average

Average Below Average Least Sustainable Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust MSCI World ex Australia Index

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

90%

Most Sustainable

Above Average

Average Below Average Least

Sustainable

Dimensional Global

Sustainability Trust

MSCI World ex Australia

Index

(7)

Weight Distribution by Sustainability Score

As at 30 September, 2021

FINANCIALS

COMMUNICATION SERVICES

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

REAL ESTATE 0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

90%

Most Sustainable

Above Average

Average Below Average Least Sustainable Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust MSCI World ex Australia Index

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

90%

Most Sustainable

Above Average

Average Below Average Least Sustainable Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust

MSCI World ex Australia Index

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

90%

Most Sustainable

Above Average

Average Below Average Least Sustainable Dimensional Global Sustainability Trust MSCI World ex Australia Index

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

90%

Most Sustainable

Above Average

Average Below Average Least Sustainable Dimensional Global

Sustainability Trust

MSCI World ex Australia Index

(8)

Emissions Exposure by Sector

7

As at 30 September, 2021

Please see “Sustainability Data Description and Disclosures” for additional information. MSCI data © MSCI 2021, all rights reserved.

Sector

Sector Weight (%)

GHG Emissions Intensity (tCO2e/USD millions sales)

Potential Emissions from Reserves (MtCO2)

Energy 1.1% 196.1 0.0

Materials 4.4% 209.0 0.0

Industrials 13.6% 38.6 0.0

Consumer Discretionary 12.9% 22.1 0.0

Consumer Staples 5.5% 38.9 0.0

Health Care 12.7% 13.8 0.0

Financials 15.8% 3.4 0.0

Information Technology 20.3% 11.6 0.0

Communication Services 8.7% 11.2 0.0

Utilities 1.1% 231.3 0.0

Real Estate 3.9% 51.4 0.0

Total 100% 32 0

DIMENSIONAL GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY TRUST

Sector

Sector Weight (%)

GHG Emissions Intensity (tCO2e/USD millions sales)

Potential Emissions from Reserves (MtCO2)

Energy 3.2% 495.3 2,812.6

Materials 3.9% 645.4 300.2

Industrials 10.4% 110.8 40.2

Consumer Discretionary 12.2% 35.2 0.0

Consumer Staples 6.9% 49.4 0.0

Health Care 12.6% 21.4 0.0

Financials 13.2% 17.8 1.5

Information Technology 22.9% 20.9 0.0

Communication Services 9.3% 13.5 0.0

Utilities 2.7% 1,956.2 1.0

Real Estate 2.6% 123.5 0.0

Total 100% 127 106

MSCI WORLD EX AUSTRALIA INDEX

(9)

Appendix

(10)

Sustainability Considerations

9

Sustainability Core Equity Trusts

1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity represents a company’s most recently reported or estimated Scope 1 (direct) + Scope 2 (indirect) greenhouse gas emissions normalised by sales in USD (metric tons per USD million sales). Greenhouse gases included are the seven gases mandated by the Kyoto Protocol: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).

This methodology is subject to change with data developments or other findings or events.

2. Companies may be excluded or underweighted for other factors believed to be important to investors interested in sustainability, such as issuers associated with significant environmental controversies.

For more information on these factors please refer to the PDS (including Additional Information Guide). Investors should consider the current PDS in deciding whether to invest in the trusts, or to continue to hold their investments in the trusts.

INDUSTRY-LEVEL CONSIDERATIONS

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity¹ 85% of score

Emphasis within each industry is placed on companies with higher sustainability scores and companies with lower sustainability scores are minimised or excluded.

Land Use and Biodiversity

15% of score Toxic Spills and Releases

Operational Waste Water Management

PORTFOLIO-LEVEL CONSIDERATIONS

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity¹ Exclude or underweight top contributors to greenhouse gas emissions

Potential Emissions from Reserves Exclude or underweight companies based on potential emissions from reserves.

ADDITIONAL ESG EXCLUSIONS²

Coal Companies with evidence of owning any proven and probable thermal or metallurgical coal reserves or any revenue from the mining of thermal coal and its sale to external parties are generally excluded.

Factory Farming Companies cited for rearing livestock using particularly intensive methods are generally excluded.

Palm Oil Companies with meaningful revenue related to palm oil are generally excluded.

Controversial Weapons Companies that manufacture cluster munitions or anti-personnel mines or their key components, chemical and biological weapons or depleted uranium ammunition and armour are generally excluded.

Nuclear Weapons Components, Systems and Support Services

Companies that manufacture components of nuclear weapons or systems that are capable of the delivery of nuclear warheads, and companies providing support services related to nuclear weapons (such as the repair and maintenance of nuclear weapons) are generally excluded.

Tobacco Companies that produce tobacco products, and companies with more than 10% of total revenue related to tobacco products are generally excluded.

Child Labour Companies cited for child labour practices are generally excluded.

Alcohol Companies with more than 10% of total revenue related to alcohol products are generally excluded.

Gambling Companies with more than 10% of total revenue related to gambling or gambling-related products are generally excluded.

Adult Entertainment Companies with more than 10% of total revenue related to adult entertainment are generally excluded.

Personal Firearms Companies with meaningful revenue related to the manufacture of personal firearms

(11)

Sustainability Data Description and Disclosures

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity represents a company’s recently reported or estimated Scope 1 (direct) + Scope 2 (indirect) greenhouse gas emissions in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) normalized by sales in USD (metric tons CO2e per USD million sales). Greenhouse gases included are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). This methodology is subject to change with data developments or other findings or events.

Potential Emissions from Reserves is a theoretical estimate of carbon dioxide produced if a company’s reported reserves of oil, gas, and coal were converted to energy, given estimated carbon and energy densities of the respective reserves.

This methodology is subject to change with data developments or other findings or events.

Certain information incorporated herein has been provided by Institutional

Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”), and by MSCI ESG Research Inc. (“ESG”). Although

Dimensional Fund Advisors’ information providers, including without limitation, ESG

and its affiliates (the “ESG Parties”), obtain information from sources they consider

reliable, none of the ESG Parties warrants or guarantees the originality, accuracy,

and/or completeness of any data herein. None of the ESG Parties makes any

express or implied warranties of any kind, and the ESG Parties hereby expressly

disclaim all warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, with

respect to any data herein. None of the ESG Parties shall have any liability for any

errors or omissions in connection with any data herein. Further, without limiting any

of the foregoing, in no event shall any of the ESG Parties have any liability for any

direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential, or any other damages (including

lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages.

(12)

Disclosure & Disclaimer

11 AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND:

This material is issued by DFA Australia Limited (AFS License No.

238093, ABN 46 065 937 671). This material is provided for information only. No account has been taken of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person. Accordingly, to the extent this material constitutes general financial product advice, investors should, before acting on the advice, consider the

appropriateness of the advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation and needs.

Investors should also consider the target market determination that has been made for each financial product either issued or distributed by DFA Australia Limited prior to proceeding with any investment. Go to au.dimensional.com/funds to access a copy of the relevant target market determination. Any opinions expressed in this material reflect our judgement at the date of publication and are subject to change.

This is not an offer or recommendation to buy or sell securities or other financial products, nor a solicitation for deposits or other

business, whether directly or indirectly. Any opinions expressed in this publication reflect our judgment at the date of publication and are subject to change.

A Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) for the Dimensional Wholesale Trusts, under which offers to invest in these trusts are made, is

available from DFA Australia Limited or by download from our

website at dimensional.com.au. Investors should consider the current

PDS in deciding whether to invest in the trusts, or to continue to hold

their investments in the trusts.

References

Related documents

For the purposes of this paper, the most significant changes in the reformed OHS statutes were the introduction of general duty provisions (the content of which was based largely

In order to gain a foundation of mechanical repair, students in the HPRT program will share a basic first semester with the Automotive Maintenance Technology (AMT) program.

Based on the overview given in chapter 5, there are a number of visualization techniques that can be used for visualizing hierarchical file systems with the

Suggestions for modification are (i) assuming the Dagum distribution as another latent true distribution, (ii) assum- ing wider heaping intervals to allow for more values being

Indeed, adding the requirement that the digital media project serve the needs of the community partner helped address this shortcoming; students taking the

Integrated pest management (IPM) systems can be assigned to different decision- making levels as well as to different integration levels, combining ecological (individual pest

All participants (including parents and staff) were encouraged to use the mobile phone for data collection and use the phone software’s playback function to share stories based on

The reason why the assumption would arise is not by virtue of there being a part- time/full-time relationship, but because Scott worked part-time so that she could undertake