• No results found

CIP - ICT Policy Support Programme

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CIP - ICT Policy Support Programme"

Copied!
176
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CIP ICT-PSP Work Programme 2013 and call 7 Place, date 2013

Annalisa Bogliolo EC, DG CNECT : “Programme Coordination” unit

CIP - ICT Policy

Support Programme

(2)

Outline

o The programme

o The instruments and the funding mechanisms o The annual work programme

o Call 7 – the objectives o How to propose

o Running activities and some examples of projects

2

(3)

• Better access to finance for SMEs through venture capital investment & loan guarantee instruments

• Europe Enterprise Network

• Support for eco-innovation

•…

Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme

(EIP)

Information Communication Technologies Policy support

Programme (ICT PSP)

Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE)

• Fostering energy efficiency &

the rational use of energy sources

• Promoting new & renewable energy sources & energy diversification

• Promoting EE & new energy sources in transport

~2,170 M€

~730 M€

~730 M€

http://ec.europa.eu/cip/index_en.htm

Competitiveness and Innovation framework Programme

• Better access to finance for SMEs through venture capital investment & loan guarantee instruments

• Europe Enterprise Network

• Support for eco-innovation

•…

3

(4)

ICT PSP

o Key funding programme supporting the ICT Policy and the Digital Agenda for Europe

ICT PSP: To drive forward innovation through the wider uptake and best use of ICTs

• Complements ICT in FP7 that aims at strengthening Europe’s

leadership role in mastering and shaping the development of ICTs

o ICT PSP: Three inter-linked goals (legal base)

Develop the Digital single market

Support innovation / wide adoption and investments in ICT

Improve quality of services and enable an inclusive Information Society

~730

~149

~135

~120

~112

~105

~52 57.4

Total 2013

2012 2011

2010 2009

2008 2007

ICTPSP

~730

~149

~135

~120

~112

~105

~52 57.4

Total 2013

2012 2011

2010 2009

2008 2007

ICTPSP

In € million, not including contribution from associated states 4

(5)

ICT PSP

o To accelerate the development of a competitive, innovative and inclusive Information Society

o Support ICT policy priorities (Digital Agenda for Europe)

o Community funding aims specifically at:

Stimulating the wider deployment and best use of innovative ICT-based solutions

Facilitating the coordination and implementation of actions for developing the information society across the Member States

5

(6)

Focus on the demand drive for innovation

FP7 WP 185

JPI

Fundamental research

Industrial R&D Experimental development

Product development

& commercialisation

Uptake and Deployment

ERC

FET-Open

ICT PSP

• Demand driven

• User-led

• Open platforms for innovation

• EU-wide uptake

• Areas of public interest

• societal challenges

PPPs JTIs

6

(7)

What do we support?

o Pilot and testing in real settings

Putting users in the lead, demand driven innovation

Significant coverage and size

Supporting policy priorities

o Diffuse widely the results

Ensure “replicability” and scalability

o Build on Member States initiatives

Share experience

Help develop common approaches

Ensure interoperability

o Prepare for wider actions

Consensus and partnership building is essential for interoperability and EU-wide deployment

7

(8)

Outline

o The programme

o The instruments and the funding mechanisms

o The annual work programme o Call 7 – the objectives

o How to propose

o Running activities and some examples of projects

8

(9)

Who can participate?

o The programme is open to all legal entities established in the EU Member States

o Legal entities established outside the EU may participate on equal terms with Member States on the basis of and in accordance with the

conditions laid down in the association agreements (associated countries*)

o Other third countries may participate on a case- by-case basis but will not receive any funding

* Croatia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Turkey and FYROM

(10)

Who participates?

o National authorities

Ministries, local and regional authorities

Public organisations e.g. hospitals, schools, libraries,..

Drivers in Pilot A, and in PPI Pilot, key users in pilot B and TN

o Private companies including SMEs

As suppliers of innovations

Mainly in Pilot B and TN as main actors

o Academia and public research

As experts and possible suppliers of innovations

10

(11)

Instruments overview

Building on initiatives in member states / associated countries  Pilots Type A Stimulating innovative use of ICT in public & private sector  Pilots Type B

Mobilisation/Exchanges between practitioners & policy makers  Thematic Networks

Three complementary instruments based on combined approaches:

Implementation through Call for Applicants

One “legacy” instrument, reserved for “digital library” theme:

Combining consensus building / awareness raising / large scale implementation  BPN (Best Practice Network)

One instrument to pilot new type of action in view of H2020:

Supporting public procurement as a driver for the deployment of innovative solutions

 PPI Pilot

(12)

Pilots Type A

• Focus on interoperability and building on Member States solutions

• Member States - Lead actors (Industry key role in the Implementation)

• The outcome should be an open, common interoperable solution with results widely disseminated and available to all Member States ( 1 project per objective)

Main features of Pilots Type A

• Legal minimum of 6 Member States (=national administrations or competence centres acting on their behalf) or associated countries participating in the consortium.

Scale and participants

• Duration is typically up to 36 months with a pilot service operating for 12 months.

• The EU contribution is limited to the costs for achieving interoperability. The indicative Community contribution available is 5-10M€ / pilot

Duration and Funding

(13)

Pilot Type A - specificities

o Intellectual property – publication and free accessibility of results

o Possibility to subcontract co-ordination task

o Reservation of budget for extension of consortium at

application stage (budget to be set aside in the budget of the co-ordinator - should typically not exceed 15% of the total budget of the pilot)

Possibility for launching competitive calls for participation o At contracting stage a consortium agreement needs to be

concluded

Pilots Type A

(14)

Pilots Type B

• Carry out an implementation of an ICT based innovative service under realistic conditions. Replication and wide validation of best practices can be specified in objective.

• emphasis on fostering innovation in services  e.g. take-up completed R&D work, extend already tested prototype services or combine / integrate several partial

solutions to realise a new innovative approach

• Particular attention to communicate and disseminate the pilot experience and outcomes in view of exploitation, replication or scaling up of piloted services

Main features of Pilots Type B

• Minimum of 4 legal entities from 4 different Member States or associated countries.

• Consortia are expected to engage the complete service value chain, including relevant public authorities (sustaining partners), service providers, industrial stakeholders & users

Scale and participants

• Duration is typically 24-36 months including the operation of a pilot service for at least 6 months

• The Community contribution is typically in the range 2-3 M€ / pilot

Duration and funding

(15)

Thematic Networks

• bring together stakeholders - explore new ways of implementing ICT based solutions.

• E.g. working groups, workshops, exchanges of good practices in view of action plans, standards and specifications

• Clearly defined and measurable results - shall be in the public domain.

Main features of Thematic Networks

Minimum 7 legal entities from 7 different Member States or associated countries.

Scale and participants

Duration and funding

• Duration between 18-36 months.

• EC contribution is typically 300-500 K€/network funded through lump sums (default) or actual cost (if specified in the workprogramme objective)

(16)

• Only for the digital libraries theme.

• Promote the adoption of respective standards and specifications by combining the

"consensus building and awareness raising" function of a network with large-scale implementation on a sufficient mass of content.

• The commission can organise “Clustering meetings" in order to achieve broad consensus and create the conditions for the widest possible uptake of the recommendations of the BPNs.

Main features of Best Practice Network (BPN)

Best Practice Network

• Legal minimum of 7 legal entities from 7 different Member States or associated countries.

Scale and participants

• The indicative Community contribution available is 3 - 5 M€ per BPN

Duration and funding

(17)

PPI Pilot

• Reinforces early deployment of innovative ICT solution

• Supports transnational groups of public (and possibly privat) procurers to adopt innovative solutions

• Results in first application of Innovative ICT solution

Main features of PPI pilot

Legal minimum of 3 mutually independent procurers from at 3 different Member States or Associated Countries, of which at least 2 two are public procurers that are established as public bodies

Scale and participants

• Indicative duration is 36 months

• The EU contribution up to 5M€ / PPI (two objectives with "one or more PPI pilots for up to 5M€")

Duration and Funding

(18)

Re-imbursement based on actual cost

(Pilots, BPNs, actual cost TNs )

Eligible and non-eligible costs

Eligibility conditions include necessity, actually incurred during the duration of the project, recorded in the accounts

Direct cost

Personnel

directly hired by the beneficiary, under sole technical supervision, remunerated in accordance with normal practices

Subcontracting

To be awarded according to the principle of best value for money under conditions of transparency and equal treatment

Other specific direct costs

Indirect costs

Costs which cannot be identified as directly attributed to the project but incurred in direct relationship with the eligible costs

calculated on the basis of flat rates

(19)

For Pilot Type A and B

– 50% of direct and indirect cost

– Indirect cost is calculated as 30% flat rate of personnel cost

For Best practice Networks – 80% of direct cost

– No funding of indirect cost

For PPI pilot

– 100% of direct coordination cost (up to 30% of total and max 1M€) – 20% of procurement price

– Indirect cost is calculated as 7% flat rate of personnel cost

For Thematic Networks specified as actual cost funding in WP – funding up to 100% of eligible cost, but

» “The financial contribution of the Union shall not finance the entire costs of the project. It shall be limited to the additional costs of coordinating and implementing the network”.

» direct cost “… for beneficiaries other than the coordinator shall be limited to travel and subsistence expenses as well as personnel costs incurred for the elaboration of any of the deliverables described in Annex I”

» indirect cost calculated as 7% of direct cost excluding subcontracting

Actual Cost Funding

(20)

Lump sum Funding / Thematic Networks

Use of lump sums

Coordinator – lump sum for coordination (dependent on number of beneficiaries)

Other beneficiaries – lump sum for implementing the network

All – lump sum for attendance of meeting cost

(21)

Thematic network – lump sum

Community financial contribution

Lump sums 'Coordination costs'

Lump sum 'Implementation

costs'

Lump sum 'attendance of meetings costs'

Coordinator

- 3.000€ per year and per beneficiary for the first 10 beneficiaries (incl. the coordinator);

- 2.000€ per year and per beneficiary from the 11th beneficiary on.

- No additional funding from the 21st beneficiary on.

Other Beneficiaries

3.000€ per year per beneficiary

Costs for attendance of networks meetings and network related events are financed by a lump sum of 5.000€ per year per beneficiary

(22)

Thematic Network – lump sum Simplifications

No definition of eligible cost

No actual cost reporting

No justification of costs

No provision of certificates

No budget transfers

Only coordinator financially validated

(23)

Reporting and Payment conditions

The consortium has 60 days after the end of reporting period to submit reports and the Commission has 90 days to pay

Payment

Pre-financing – typically to cover 18 months

Interim

Final - payment of the balance

Payments upon approval of reports and deliverables

(24)

Outline

o The programme

o The instruments and the funding mechanisms o The annual work programme

o Call 7 – the objectives o How to propose

o Running activities and some examples of projects

24

(25)

Priority setting

o Themes & objectives fixed in annual WP o Support EU ICT policy objectives

o Support innovation policy objectives

o Areas that need financial intervention at EU level o Readiness of the stakeholders

25

(26)

Annual Work Programme

o Objectives to be reached and areas to be covered per year

o Budget allocations per year

o Funding instruments to be used o Rules for participation

o Evaluation criteria

o Planning for Call for proposals (>90% of budget) o Calls for tenders and other measures

26

(27)

WP evolution

WP2007 WP2008 WP2009 WP2010 WP2011 WP2012 WP2013

54M€ 40M€ 107M€ 107M€ 116 M€ 127 M€ 125,7 M€

4 themes / 12 Obj. 3 themes / 12 Obj. 8 themes / 24 Obj. 6 themes / 20 Obj. 5 themes / 15 Obj. 5 themes / 15 Obj. 5 themes / 19 Obj.

Public services Health

Inclusion Others

Public services &

Inclusion

Energy Efficiency Internet &

security

Health, ageing well and inclusion Digital libraries Public services Energy Efficiency and smart

mobility

Multilingual web PSI

Internet & sec.

Open innovation

Low carbon economy &

mobility

Digital libraries Health, ageing well and inclusion Public services Multilingual web Smart cities

Low carbon economy &

mobility

Digital libraries Health, ageing well and inclusion Public services Smart cities

Smart cities Digital content, open data and creativity Health, ageing well and inclusion Public services Trusted eServices

Public services and Smart cities Digital content, open data and creativity Health, ageing well and inclusion Trusted eServices Open objective for Innovation

Cft - 11 M€ Cft - 4 M€ Cft - 8 M€ Cft - 9 M€ Cft - 9 M€ Cft - 12,4 M€ Cft - 10,8 M€

22 projects (3PA;

8 PB; 11 TN) 86 prop.

19 projects (1PA;

12 PB; 6 TN) 66 prop.

49 projects

(1+2PA; 38 PB;

4 BPN, 4 TN) 187 prop.

39 projects

(2+2PA; 23 PB;

8BPN, 4TN) 139 prop.

44 projects (1PA;

35 PB; 6 BPN, 2 TN)

187 prop.

41 projects (8 PA;

26PB; 7 BPN, 10 TN)

165 prop.

(28)

Outline

o The programme

o The instruments and the funding mechanisms o The annual work programme

o Call 7 – the objectives

o How to propose

o Running activities and some examples of projects

28

(29)

ICT PSP Call 7

125,7 M€

Cloud of public services and smart

cities 32.5 M€

Digital Content, open data and

creativity 36 M€

ICT for health, ageing well and

inclusion 39 M€

Trusted eServices 7 M€

Open objective for innovation and

other actions 11.2 M€

29

(30)

ICT PSP Call 7, cont.

o Five Themes: Covering in total 19 Objectives o Total indicative budget: 125,7 M€

o (+10.8 M€ for call for tenders/other measures) o Call7 launch: 21 December 2012

o Call7 close: 14 May 2013

o General infoday in Brussels on 15 January 2013 o + National information days and Specific Thematic

workshop

30

(31)

o Cloud of public services (18 M€: pilots B)

To test and validate a set of cloud-based services preparing for larger deployment

Enabling "open" public services, interoperability, improving transparency and trust

o Smart, sustainable mobility (13.5 M€: pilots B + 1 TN)

Piloting ICT-based Interoperable Fare Management for sustainable mobility

Cooperative systems for sustainable mobility of goods

Preparing the ground for Public Procurement for Innovative Solutions (PPI) on cooperative Intelligent Transport

Systems

Resource efficient data centres for smart cities (1 M€: 1 TN)

Preparing PPI for resource efficient data centres

Theme 1 - Cloud of public services and smart cities

31

(32)

Objective 1.1: Cloud of Public Services

a) Innovate

Breaking silos, offer interoperable services

Opening and reuse of services

Migrate to cloud computing infrastructure

Validate common specification of cloud services

Path towards the CEF: Promote reuse of building

blocks available from the Pilots A

(33)

Objective 1.1: Cloud of Public Services

b) Transparency and Trust

Implementation of the principle

"information must be provided only once to public administration"

Empowering citizens to have access to their information and monitor its usage

Reuse trusted services

(34)

Opening

Public Sector

Private Sector

(35)

o Characteristics

12 months piloting

Develop business case

Should include all relevant stakeholders, private/public services providers

Attention must be taken to privacy and data protection

Usage of cloud infrastructure o Impact

Increase usage of cloud infrastructure

Improve administrative efficiency, increase trust

Demonstrate the benefit of this new architecture

Objective 1.1: Cloud of Public Services

(36)

• Contact:

[email protected]

[email protected]

• Websites:

https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/digital-life/government http://www.epractice.eu

http://www.buildconnectgrow.eu/

http://ec.europa.eu/egovernment

More information

(37)

Objective 1.2: Smart Sustainable Mobility

1.2.a - Piloting ICT-based Interoperable Fare Mana-gement (IFM) for sustainable mobility

1.2.b - Piloting cooperative systems for sustainable mobility of goods

1.2.c - Preparing the ground for Public Procurement for Innovative solutions on

Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-

ITS)

(38)

EU policy

• March 2010 - Europe 2020: Smart, Sustainable and inclusive Growth

Confirmation of 20/20/20 targets for 2020

• March 2011 - Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy by 2050

Reducing GHG emissions by 80-95% by 2050 (compared to 1990 values)

• June 2011 - White Paper on European Transport Policy

By 2050 reduce emissions by 60%, and 20% by 2020 (2008 level)

By 2050 move close to zero fatalities in road transport, halving road casualties by 2020

• July 2012 - European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities

large-scale deployment of smart city solutions in Europe, focusing on intersection of ICT, energy and transport

• Sep 2012 - European Cloud Computing Strategy

Unleashing potential of Cloud Computing in Europe

(39)

EU GHG emissions toward 80%

reduction by 2050 (compared to 1990)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Current policy Power Sector

Residential & Tertiary

Non CO2 Other Sectors Industry

Transport

Non CO2 Agriculture

(40)

Roles of ICT

• Addressing its own environmental footprint, which is rising as the sector expands

yet also

• Playing a leading role as an enabler of energy

efficiency and sustainability in other sectors (e.g.

transport, energy, manufacturing..)

(41)

Objective 1.2.a): Piloting ICT-based Interoperable Fare Management (IFM) for sustainable mobility

Focus and outcomes (1/2):

• Support demand for seamless intermodal mobility in cities with ICT based measures such as new approaches in automatic fare

collection systems.

• Strengthen the role of public

transport by making it more user

friendly.

(42)

Objective 1.2.a):

Piloting ICT-based Interoperable Fare Management (IFM) for sustainable mobility

Focus and outcomes (2/2):

• Help public transport operators with roll-out of advanced IFM schemes to offer travellers

packages covering all modes of transportation, personalised and managed through a shared style of contactless media (e.g., NFC) which can be used for multiple transport products, ensuring

interoperability at service level.

• Demonstrate how seamless IFM can be rolled out across regions through cooperation between

different transport operators.

Funding instrument:

• Pilot B; aim to support 2-3 pilots; budget: €6 M€

(43)

Objective 1.2.a):

Piloting ICT-based Interoperable Fare Management (IFM) for sustainable mobility

Conditions and characteristics (1/2):

• The pilots should involve stakeholders from the whole value chain needed to ensure effective deployment of the application (e.g., public transport operators,

telecom, suppliers, service providers and industry). The participation of users is essential.

• Validation must be carried out in real life conditions, for at least 1 year, and result in a consolidated set of best practices, including guidelines, business models, manuals, training material.

• It is expected that the pilots present a strategy for a sustainable deployment of the systems and services beyond the pilot phase.

(44)

Objective 1.2.a):

Piloting ICT-based Interoperable Fare Management (IFM) for sustainable mobility

Conditions and characteristics (2/2):

Special attention should be paid to service interoperability and the use of existing standards.

The pilots need to have a strong focus on the incorporation of several services on a single open platform, and on the cross border capabilities of that platform.

Solutions should be based on open specifications and open standards, allowing interaction with multiple providers

Proposals should take into account results of previous EU funded projects in this field, and the results of the preparatory action launched by the Commission "To develop and validate a European passenger transport information and booking system across transport modes"

(45)

Objective 1.2.b: Piloting cooperative systems for sustainable mobility of goods

Focus and outcomes:

Optimising cargo management by means of real time communication among objects (i.e. vehicles, cargo items & infrastructure) to ensure efficient management and sustainable transport of goods, reducing unnecessary movements of trucks and optimising load factors.

The proposed pilot should aim at validating novel solutions managing connectivity, tracking and monitoring of goods and assets on the

move leveraging machine to machine communications (M2M).

• Proposed solutions are expected to support managed and integrated mobile communications for logistics applications with lower cost, easier manageability of roaming, scalable systems for self-configuring,

intelligent transport objects (i.e. Intelligent Cargo).

(46)

Objective 1.2.b: Piloting cooperative systems for sustainable mobility of goods

Conditions and characteristics (1/2)

• The pilots should involve stakeholders from the whole value chain needed to ensure effective deployment of the

application (e.g., transport operators, logistic companies, telecom, suppliers, and industry). The participation of users is essential.

• Validation must be carried out in real life conditions, for at least 1 year, and result in a consolidated set of best

practices, including guidelines, business models, manuals, training material.

• It is expected that the pilots present a strategy for a

sustainable deployment of the systems and services beyond the pilot phase.

(47)

Objective 1.2.b: Piloting cooperative systems for sustainable mobility of goods

Focus and outcomes (2/2):

• Solutions should be accessible for all parties involved in freight transport contributing to more sustainable transport of goods.

• Pilots should consider e-Freight/Intelligent Cargo initiatives

• M2M efficient integration to businesses that may be reusable in use cases other than transport is welcome.

• Pilots should pay special attention to interoperability and use of existing standards (M /453)

• The pilot should also address potentially necessary

regulatory changes in terms of communication technologies in Europe to make such changes happen.

Funding instrument:

• Pilot B; aim to support 2-3 pilots; budget: €6.5 m

(48)

Objective 1.2.c) Preparing the ground for Public Procurement for Innovative solutions on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS)

Focus:

• The focus of this action is to develop a coordination mechanism among public road administrations

• To promote the use of common PPI guidelines when procuring innovative road side infrastructure or when

specifying them to their concessionaires.

• A common vision and a strong cooperation among all stakeholders

based on an agreed deployment roadmap is also needed for this to

happen.

(49)

Objective 1.2.c) Preparing the ground for Public

Procurement for Innovative solutions on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS)

Outcome:

• To help Public Authorities to establish the needed ITS infrastructure (road side equipment) in support of the vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I-I2V) cooperative

mobility applications.

• Final aim: Facilitate the move towards a large scale deployment of C-ITS services in Europe ensuring cross-border and cross-brand interoperability.

Funding instrument:

• Thematic Network (aim to support one only network);

budget: up to €1 m

(50)

Objective 1.3 : Preparing public procurement for innovative solutions on resource efficient data centres for smart cities

Focus and outcomes:

• Help public administrations enhance energy and environmental footprint of data centres through harmonising and accelerating adoption of

guidance/specs to procure technologies & systems

• Action particularly relevant in context of smart cities where most data

centres are built & resources are at a

much higher demand

(51)

Objective 1.3 : Preparing public procurement for innovative solutions on resource efficient data centres for smart cities

Conditions and characteristics:

• Develop strong coordination mechanism among public

administrations and promote use of common guidance and standards on sustainability when procuring data-centres

• Drivers: relevant public administrations; wide EU-coverage

• Important: proposals to demonstrate expertise both on clouds/virtualisation and on measuring

• Compact consortia, i.e., no redundant roles for partners from the

same country

(52)

Objective 1.3 : Preparing public procurement for innovative solutions on resource efficient data centres for smart cities

Expected impact:

• Significant improvement of resource efficiency of data centres

• Significant increase in use of cloud/virtualisation technology for energy efficiency

• Promotion of standards/metrics in the field

• Increase of European industry competitiveness on green ICT Funding instrument:

• Thematic Network (based on actual costs); aim to support one

only network; budget: €1 m

(53)

More information

Obj. 1.2a: [email protected] Obj. 1.2b&c: [email protected]

Obj. 1.3: [email protected]

www.intelligentcargo.eu/

www.efreightproject.eu/

www.comesafety.org

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/its/index_en.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/esafety/index_en.htm

www.ifm-project.eu

www.coolemall.eu

www.all4green-project.eu

www.thegreengrid.org Follow us on Twitter

@EU_SmartCities

@ICT4TransportEU

(54)

Theme 2 - Digital content, open data and creativity

o 2.1 Europeana and Creativity (16 M€: BPNs/pilots B + 1 TN)

Enriching and improving the Europeana content base

Promoting the use of Europeana by creative industries

Coordinating Europeana

o 2.2 Open data (8 M€: pilots B)

Open data experimentation and innovation building on geographic information

Standards for Open Data

o 2.3 ICT for learning (6 M€: pilots B)

Piloting and showcasing excellence in ICT for learning for all

Organising competitions on Educational Games

o 2.4 Digital content technologies for a better internet for kids (3 M€ pilots B)

Piloting toolkit to help in child sex abuse investigation contexts

Interoperability for content rating and classification schemes

o 2.5 eArchiving services (3 M€: 1 pilot B)

Piloting eArchiving service solutions

54

(55)

Current Situation

••• 55

(56)

••• 56

Objective 2.1 Europeana and

creativity

(57)

Objective 2.1a Enriching and improving the content base

••• 57

Aggregator

Provider n.1 Provider n.2 Provider n.3

Metadata

(58)

Objective 2.1a Enriching and improving the content base

••• 58

Best Practice Networks for up to 5 M€

• Explore new ways of improving the quality of Europeana

metadata, e.g. through crowdsourcing, sematic web technologies or linking data.

• Aggregation of existing digital cultural heritage content held by cultural institutions (libraries, archives and museums) and/or

private content holders (e.g. publishers) in order to make it

accessible through Europeana. The content must be of interest to a broad public.

Preference will be given to proposals contributing audio-visual

material including films, documentaries, audio and video recordings.

(59)

Objective 2.1b Promoting the use of Europeana by creative industries

••• 59 environments enabling the development of creative

applications and services that make the best use of Europeana cultural resources.

(60)

Objective 2.1b Promoting the use of Europeana by creative industries

••• 60

Best Practice Networks for up to 7 M€

• Experiment with models, innovative applications and services for creative re-use of cultural resources, and in particular the material accessible through Europeana.

• The actions should lead to environments enabling the development of creative applications and services that make the best use of

Europeana cultural resources. This should pave the way for wider re-use of Europe's cultural resources and boost creativity and

business development.

(61)

Objective 2.1c Coordinating Europeana

••• 61

Means for inter acti on Network

coordination

Re-users

(62)

Objective 2.1c Coordinating Europeana

••• 62

Thematic Network for up to 4 M€

• The aim is to support the functioning and development of the Europeana central service. This includes:

• the coordination of the network of contributing organisations,

• the promotion of Europeana services, the ingestion and management of content as well as the

• release of major new versions of the service to make it more user-friendly, more visible and better suited for close

collaboration with the creative industries.

(63)

Objective 2.2 Open data

o What is Open (public) Data ?

Open (public) Data or Public Sector Information (PSI) is information produced by public

institutions in the performance of their tasks.

It represents a major digital content resource for innovative applications and services.

PSI is of great economic value. It can help address societal challenges, increase transparency,

empower citizens and accelerate scientific progress.

63

(64)

What are we funding?

o 2.2 a - Open Data experimentation and innovation building on geographic information

Outcome: Increase substantially the exploitation opportunities for open GI, Facilitate market entry of new companies and the development of innovative services

Several pilots B for up to 7 M€ of total EU contribution

o 2.2 b - Standards for Open Data

Outcome: Agreement on standards to enable interoperability and integration of public sector information across Europe and beyond

One Thematic Network for up to 1 M€ of EU contribution

64

(65)

Objective 2.2a – what is the focus?

65

The aim is to stimulate innovation and business activities around GI data and solutions enhanced by location-based

services.

• The pilots should focus on the development of virtual hubs that facilitate the use of open geographic data from different sources for the creation of innovative

applications and services.

• The hubs should be at the basis of concrete experiments that clearly identify and provide solutions for real world

problems and/or address market opportunities.

(66)

Objective 2.2 a – What are the conditions?

66

General:

• Build on state-of-the-art technologies

• Lead to an easier discoverability and use of geographic information

• Draw datasets from different sources

• Solutions proposed shall be validated and tested With regard to volunteered GI:

• Address incentives to provide information

• Describe methods of predicting accuracy

• Address privacy concerns

(67)

Objective 2.2 b – What is the focus?

67

• Bring together a broad range of stakeholders in the re-use of public sector information:

• Commercial re-users

• Public sector bodies

• Standards bodies

• Policy makers

• Civil society

• Academics

• Agree on standards enabling interoperability and

integration of public sector information across Europe and

beyond.

(68)

Objective 2.2 b – What are the conditions?

68

• Broad range of stakeholders interested in standards in the re-use of public sector information and open data

• Experts should have thorough knowledge of the situation concerning PSI

• The coordinator should have solid experience in the field

of standards and organisation of coordination activities at

EU level

(69)

Objective 2.3a Piloting and showcasing excellence in ICT for learning for all

••• 69

Pilot B – up to 5MEUR

• large scale pilots involving at least 50.000 students and 4.000 teachers / at least 10 regional actors/hubs of

excellence

• targeting formal/non-formal/informal learning

• covering digital literacy and computing, artistic and creative skills, mathematics

• at least one piloting scenario dedicated to people special

needs or at risk of exclusion

(70)

Objective 2.3b Organising competitions on educational games

••• 70

TN (Actual Costs) – 1 MEUR

• Organising competitions on educational games on maths, ICT skills, healthier lifestyle

• Take account of special needs - children at risk-of exclusion/elderly

• Consortium with experience in organising competitions and

ensure appropriate follow up for wide dissemination of the

results in mainstream education

(71)

Objective 2.4a Digital content technologies for victim identification

••• 71

PILOT B - up to 2 MEUR

• Image/content recognition technologies improving improve accuracy and processing time (still and moving images)

• Consortium with at least two law enforcement authorities

• Wide availability of the results

(72)

Objective 2.4b Interoperability of content rating and classification schema

••• 72

PILOT B - up to 1 MEUR

• interoperability framework for cross-border content rating and classification schemes

• cross-border retrieval of content for children and be open to tools such as parental controls

• the pilot should cover at least 5 countries

(73)

Objective 2.5 eArchiving services for government and public services

••• 73

establishing replicable and scalable technical specifications and tools

for the integration of different document management and archiving

systems within public service process/workflow environments.

(74)

Objective 2.5 European archiving infrastructure for government and public services

••• 74

Pilot B – one pilot for 3 M€

The solutions should address

• data authenticity,

• provenance,

• integrity,

• availability

• usability over time.

• In addition the pilot should share information on:

• integration,

• operation and

• interoperability issues

(75)

Further Info

For Objective 2.1

[email protected]

About Europeana at

http://pro.europeana.eu/

For Objective 2.2

[email protected]

For Objective 2.3

[email protected]

For Objective 2.4

[email protected]

For Objective 2.5

[email protected]

••• 75

(76)

Theme 3 - Preparing large scale deployment of targeted services to support active and

healthy ageing

o Telehealth programmes for the management of mental disorders: Pilot A, 7 M€

o To collect, strengthen, enhance existing good practices that can be transferred and scaled up across Europe in order to:

Implement widespread, real-life solutions for the treatment of mental disorders based on innovative telehealth services

Validate and strengthen the evidence for the management of mental disorders based on telehealth solutions,

especially with regard to cost-effectiveness and transferability of services;

Enhance professionals’ and users' acceptance and satisfaction

76

(77)

THEME 3: the context

Policy Context

 Digital Agenda (patient empowerment, interoperability of EHR, active ageing and independent living)

 Innovation Union Strategic purpose, scope

European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing

 Prevention and health promotion

 Integrated health and social care

 Independent, active living

 Citizens leading healthy, active and independent lives

 Improving the sustainability of health and social care systems

 Boosting and improving the competitiveness of the markets

(78)

Funding instrument: Pilot A. One Pilot, up to 7 M€ EU contribution

Focus and outcomes

o To collect, strengthen, enhance existing good practices that can be transferred and scaled up across Europe in order to:

o Implement widespread, real-life solutions for the treatment of mental disorders based on innovative telehealth services

o Validate and strengthen the evidence for the management of mental disorders based on telehealth solutions, especially with regard to cost-effectiveness and transferability of services;

o Enhance professionals’ and users' acceptance and satisfaction

Obj 3.1.a: Telehealth programmes for

the management of mental disorders

(79)

Obj 3.1.a: Telehealth programmes for the management of mental disorders

Conditions and characteristics

o Build on existing projects, reuse and expand, established and scientifically validated methodologies.

o Involve public authorities, providers of telehealth services, associations of care professionals, patient organisations, reimbursement scheme providers, insurers, procurers and regional development planners.

o Target deployment of telehealth services for mental disorders in minimum six MS or associated countries, incl. significant number of national and/or regional healthcare authorities. To facilitate exchange of good practice and coaching, good

balance of early adopter and follower participants.

(80)

Obj 3.1.a: Telehealth programmes for the management of mental disorders

Conditions and characteristics

o Deploy sole disease management programme for each mental disorder across several pilot sites. Based on multi-centric

design (i.e. homogeneous intervention and homogeneous methodological approach) for comparability between pilot sites and large scale evidence.

o Develop guidelines for large-scale deployment of telehealth services for mental disorders and transferability of the results to other sites. To address technical issues, issues linked to cross-border deployment…

o Report evidence on effectiveness and efficiency; data

concerning compliance and adherence to the treatment; and safety of the interventions.

o Not exceed 36 months duration.

(81)

Obj 3.1.a: Telehealth programmes for the management of mental disorders

Impact

o Stimulating wider deployment of evidence-based telehealth services for mental disorders.

o Contributing to a long-term sustainability plan for pan-European deployment;

o Providing practical solutions to address legal, regulatory issues;

o Contributing to adoption of common ICT-based components /

building blocks needed for the deployment of telehealth services;

o Raising awareness, enhancing evidence on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine services on a large scale;

o Empowering patients using the services.

(82)

Funding Instrument: Pilot B – several pilots for up to 7M€ in total

Focus and outcomes:

ICT services and applications in integrated care programmes (either vertically within healthcare or horizontal integration of healthcare, social care, long-term and self-care)

• Unlock innovative services and value chains

• Involve new actors (e.g. insurers)

• Deploy novel organisational models and care pathways

Target primarily national and/or regional authorities

deploying integrated care programmes for the first time

Objective 3.1b: Wide deployment of

integrated care

(83)

Conditions and characteristics:

Involve necessary value-chain of stakeholders (national/regional authorities, telehealth/telecare service providers, insurers, procurers, associations of care professionals, informal care givers, patient and elderly organisations, regional development planners etc. )

Deployment of integrated care programmes in several

national/regional authorities, building upon good practices,

experiences and results. Coaching of “first time deployment” regions by “early adopter” regions

Clear identification of the target group of patients or older people and the health/living conditions addressed by the services

For each target group of patients or older people: a commonly

designed integrated care programme to be deployed across all pilot sites (i.e. homogeneous care pathways and methodological approach) – to allow aggregation of evidence

Objective 3.1b: Wide deployment of

integrated care

(84)

Conditions and characteristics:

Validate and implement the necessary organisational changes:

patient care pathways; training of care teams, informal care givers and patients; reimbursement models and synergies between social care and healthcare budgets

Operational phase of at least 12 months

Report evidence on benefits related to health outcomes and daily activities, as well as effectiveness and efficiency

Exploitation plan dealing with both the sustainability and the scalability of the services beyond the pilot phase

Make results freely available – e.g. open source implementations of components and building blocks for services, specifications of

interfaces, protocols, architecture, care pathways, guidelines etc.

Quantitative indicators to monitor progress

Objective 3.1b: Wide deployment of

integrated care

(85)

Impact :

Contribution to improved communication and co-operation between health, social and informal care sectors

Contribution towards first-time introduction of integrated care programmes in Member States or Associated Countries and regions

Provision of practical solutions to address organisational, legal, regulatory and reimbursement issues for integrated care

Enhance the body of evidence on quality of life and health

outcome benefits, effectiveness and efficiency of integrated care solutions

Raise awareness and knowledge of care professionals, patients and the elderly population of the benefits of integrated care

Contribute to the competitiveness of the European ICT industry

Availability of common ICT-based components/building blocks necessary for the deployment of integrated care services

Objective 3.1b: Wide deployment of

integrated care

(86)

Overall objectives

o to facilitate public purchasing of innovative solutions (PPI) in healthcare, ageing well and assisted living, which have not yet been deployed on a large scale (i.e. new/small scale).

o to support the implementation of the Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) of the European Innovation Partnership on Active &

Healthy Ageing (EIP AHA)

o aligned with eHealth Action Plan, related to innovative public procurement for new products, scalability and interoperability

Objective 3.2 (a+b): Supporting PPI in

eHealth, active and healthy ageing and

assisted living

(87)

Funding instrument : PPI pilot, one or more PPI pilots for 5 M€

of total EU contribution

Focus and outcomes

o to improve sustainable deployment of new or improved

services by the health procurers covering target outcomes in line with the policies, e.g. improvement of early hospital

discharge, delivery of healthcare in remote, sparsely

populated regions, eHealth services, and pre/post operation care outside the hospital

o scope is to specify, purchase and deploy ICT based solutions which can deliver sustainable, new or improved services and improve the ecosystem in which health procurement

approaches for innovative solutions are successfully applied

Objective 3.2.a: eHealth

(88)

Funding instrument: PPI pilot, one or more PPI pilots for 5 M€

of total EU contribution

Focus and outcomes

o stimulating PPI in health and social care for older persons accelerating uptake and large scale deployment of new ICT based products and services (with demonstrated

improvements in small scale settings of independence, functionality and well-being)

o support to proposal(s) planning to deploy ICT-based solutions addressing (one or several) of the defined SIP priority action areas of the EIP AHA

Objective 3.2.b: Active & healthy ageing

and assisted living

(89)

Conditions and characteristics (common for a and b) o Proposals driven by clearly identified procurement needs

of (health)care organisations

o Solutions should be based on a complete set of common specifications for technology and end to end services o The implementation phase should have the ambition to

reach a scale of at least 5000 end users across multiple regions of Europe

o Proposals must associate public and/or private procurers from each country participating with responsibilities and

budget control in the areas of care or supply of services.

Objectives 3.2 (a+b): Supporting PPI in

eHealth, active and healthy ageing and

assisted living

(90)

Conditions and characteristics – continued

o Build on and contribute to relevant standards to ensure interoperability and take into account best practices and

relevant standardisation efforts

o Include a non-confidential, comprehensive socio-

economic evidence base for ICT investments in the field to facilitate the development of sustainable business models

o Good practices will be made available for replication in other regions (e.g. plans for larger-scale sustainable

uptake, guidelines, manuals and educational materials)

References

Related documents

 Mask with pre- build functions or customize  Mask consistently across systems  Policy-based controls to detect unauthorized activity  Vulnerability assessment &

Oracle Data Guard adalah sebuah infrastruktur perangkat lunak yang digunakan untuk manajemen, monitoring, dan automatisasi yang berkerja bersama sebuah basis data produksi

The study in its findings observed that there is a significant positive relation- ship between firms’ financial performance, size of firms and board independence on the dividend

This chapter invited you to think about what photography is and some of the things it can do in the context of urban research and analysis. Photography’s potential is far greater than

The tool, which they have presented, that is the business model canvas, con- tains nine related blocks: value proposition (value offered by an organization to its customers),

To load calibration files from the PC to the Toyota/Lexus Diagnostic Tester or Vetronix Mastertech*, follow these steps:B. Within the web browser, select the appropriate Toyota

From this review of social movement theories and 20th-century social movements, I move to the literature on youth organizing approaches in order to set the stage for

To fill these research gap, this study examined the paradoxical relationships between espoused cultural values, perceived organizational culture, negative emotions (fear of