1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z
0 g 11 i ;;
V) 0 a: g, L. 0u 12
(. -'"'
-zz:"
o ~ 13
V) ~i- 0 c: g: 14 - s:$ ~
V):S 15
o !;a: V1 c: ~ 16 i ~U 0
- I-a:!;
~~ 17
~~ 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WM. MATTHEW DITZHAZY City Attorney
City of Palmdale
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON A Professional Corporation
JAMES L. MARKMAN (43536) (jmarkman~rwglaw.com) STEVEN R. ORR (136615) (sorr~rwglaw.com)
WHITNEY G. MCDONALD (245587) (wmcdonald~rwglaw.com) 355 South Grand Avenue, 40th Floor .
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3101 Telephone: (213) 626-8484 Facsimile: (213) 626-0078
Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Complainant, and Cross-Defendant CITY OF PALMDALE
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
ANTELOPE VALLEY GROUNDWATER Judicial Council Coordination
CASES Proceeding No. 4408
Included Actions:
Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 40 v. Diamond Farming Co.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC 325201
Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 40 v. Diamond Farming Co.
Superior Court of California, County of Kern, Case No. S-1500-CV-254-348
Wm. Bolthouse Farms, Inc. v. City of
Lancaster
Diamond Farming Co. v. City of Lancaster
Diamond Farming Co. v. Palmdale Water District
Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, consolidated actions, Case Nos.
RIC 353840, RIC 344436, RIC 344668
PROPOUNDING PARTY:
RESPONDING PARTY:
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGA TORIES
(SET NO. ONE)
Phase 2 Trial: October 6, 2008
(Hon. Jack Komar)
(Exempt from Filing Fees Pursuant to Govt Code
§6103)
REBECCA LEE WILLIS CITY OF PALMDALE
SET NO. ONE
P6399-1234\ 1 069774v l.doc
Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0 12
a: g, L. 8(. -'"'
-zz: " 13 o ~
V) ~ 14
~ æ
$ ~ 15 - s:
V) :S
o !;a: V1 c: ~ 16 I ~U 0
- I- 17
a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND GENERAL OBJECTIONS
The following responses by the City of Palmdale ("Palmdale") to the first set of form interrogatories propounded by the Rebecca Lee Wilis ("Willis") are made solely
for the purpose of this action and are based on information presently available to
Palmdale. Given the early stages of discovery, Palmdale anticipates that it may discover further information after the date of service of these responses and hereby reserves the right to amend, supplement or modify these responses to reflect the result of ongoing investigation, discovery, document review and analysis. However, nothing in these responses shall be construed to impose a duty on Palmdale to voluntarily update these responses, absent a formal request by Wilis pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Palmdale objects to each and every form interrogatory to the extent it requests information protected from disclosure by the joint defense privilege, the attorney-client privilege (Evidence Code §§ 950, et seq.), and/or information immune from discovery
under the attorney work product doctrine (Code of Civil Procedure §§ 2018.010, et seq.).
Each response contained herein is subject to all applicable objections (including, but not limited to, objections concerning competency, relevancy, materiality, propriety, and admissibility), which require the exclusion of any said response in any court hearing or proceeding. All such objections and grounds are reserved and may be interposed at the time of triaL.
Palmdale objects to each interrogatory to the extent that it seeks information that is the subject of expert witness study and/or testimony yet to be developed by the parties.
Palmdale's investigation is stil continuing and Palmdale reserves the right to supplement or modify its responses to these interrogatories.
Palmdale incorporates all of these objections (the "General Objections") into each
of the responses herein. Subject to and without waiving any of the foregoing, Palmdale
responds as follows:
-2-
P6399-1234\ I 069774v l.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0a: g, 12
L. 0u
(. -'"'
-zz: " 13 o ~V) ~ i- 0 14
c: g:
$ ~ 15 - s:
V) :S
o !;
a: V1 16
c: ~I ~ U 0 17
- I-a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORIES
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 1.1:
State the name, ADDRESS, telephone number, and relationship to you of each PERSON who prepared or assisted in the preparation of the responses to these
interrogatories. (Do not identify anyone who simply typed or reproduced the responses.) RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 1.1:
James L. Markman, Steven R. Orr, Erin L. Powers, Whitney G. McDonald Richards, Watson & Gershon
355 South Grand Avenue, 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 626-8484
Counsel to the City of Palmdale
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.1:
Are you a corporation? If so, state:
(a) (b)
the name stated in the current articles of incorporation;
all other names used by the corporation during the past 10 years and the
dates each was used;
the date and place of incorporation;
the ADDRESS of the principal place of business; and
(c) (d)
(e) whether you are qualified to do business in California.
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.1:
No.
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.2:
Are you a partnership? If so, state:
(a) the current partnership name;
-3-
P6399-1234\ 1 069774v l.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0 12
a: g, L. 0u
(. -'"'
-zz: " 13 a ~V) ~
~ æ 14
$ ~ 15 - s:
V) :S
o !;
a: V1 16
c: ~I ~ U 0 17
- I-a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
(b) all other names used by the partership during the past 10 years and the
dates each was used;
(c) jurisdiction;
(d) (e)
whether you are a limited partnership and, if so, under the laws of what
the name and ADDRESS of each general partner; and
the ADDRESS of the principal place of business.
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.2:
No.
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.3:
Are you a limited liability company? If so, state:
(a) (b) each was used;
(c) (d) (e)
the name stated in the current articles of organization;
all other names used by the company during the past 10 years and the date
the date and place of filing of the articles of organization;
the ADDRESS of the principal place of business; and
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.3:
whether you are qualified to do business in California.
No.
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.4:
Are you a joint venture? If so, state:
(a) (b)
the current j oint venture name;
all other names used by the joint venture during the past 10 years and the
dates each was used;
(c) (d)
the name and ADDRESS of each joint venturer; and
the ADDRESS of the principal place of business.
-4-
Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
P6399-1234\ I 069774v l.doc
1
2 3
4
5
6 7
8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0 12
a: g, L. 0u
(. -'"'
-2 13
z: "
a ~V) ~
14
i- 0
c: g:
$ ~ 15 - s:
V) :S
o !;a: V1
c: ~ 16 U 0I ~
- I- 17 a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.4:
No.
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.5:
Are you an unincorporated association? If so, state:
(a) (b)
the current unincorporated association name;
all other names used by the unincorporated association during the past 10 years and the dates each was used; and
(c) the ADDRESS of the principal place of business.
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.5:
No.
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.6:
Have you done business under a fictitious name during the past 10 years? If so, for each fictitious name state:
(a) (b) (c) (d)
the name;
the dates each was used;
the state and county of each fictitious name filing; and
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.6:
the ADDRESS of the principal place of business.
No.
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.7:
Within the past five years has any public entity registered or licensed your businesses? If so, for each license or registration:
(a) (b) (c)
identify the license or registration;
state the name of the public entity; and state the dates of issuance and expiration.
-5-
Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
P6399-1234\ 1 069774v l.doc
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0 12
a: g,
L. 0u
(. -'"'
-zz: " 13 o ~V) ~
~ æ 14
$ ~ 15 - s:
V) :S
o !;
a: V1 c: ~ 16 I ~U 0
- I- 17 a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 3.7:
No.
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.1:
State the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of each individual:
(a) who witnessed the INCIDENT or the events occurrng immediately before or after the INCIDENT;
(b) (c)
who made any statement at the scene of the INCIDENT;
who heard any statements made about the INCIDENT by any individual at the scene; and
(d) who YOU OR ANYONE ACTING ON YOUR BEHALF claim has knowledge of the INCIDENT (except for expert witnesses covered by Code of Civil Procedure Section 2034).
RESPONSKTO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.1:
The District incorporates by this reference the Preliminary Statement and General Objections as though expressly set forth herein. The District objects to this Form
Interrogatory as improper because "characteristic of the Basin/aquifer," "safe yield" and
"overdraft" are not incidents. The District objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it requests information protected by the attorney work product doctrine and attorney- client privilege. This Interrogatory is the subject of expert witness investigation and may be answered at the time such expert witness investigation is appropriately disclosed pursuant to Court Order and the Code of Civil Procedure
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.2:
Have YOU OR ANYONE ACTING ON YOUR BEHALF interviewed any individual concerning the INCIDENT? If so, for each individual state:
(a) (b)
the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the individual interviewed;
the date of the interview; and
-6-
P6399-1234\ I 069774v l.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0 12
a: g, L. 0u
(. -'"'
-zz: " 13 a ~V) ~
~ æ 14
$ ~ 15 - s:
V) :S
o !;a: V1 c: ~ 16 I ~U 0
- I- 17 a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
(c) the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the PERSON who conducted the interview.
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.2:
The District incorporates by this reference the Preliminary Statement and General Objections as though expressly set forth herein. The District objects to this Form
Interrogatory as improper because "characteristic of the Basin/aquifer," "safe yield" and
"overdraft" are not incidents. The District objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it requests information protected by the attorney work product doctrine and attorney- client privilege. This Interrogatory is the subject of expert witness investigation and may be answered at the time such expert witness investigation is appropriately disclosed pursuant to Court Order and the Code of Civil Procedure
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.3:
Have YOU OR ANYONE ACTING ON YOUR BEHALF obtained a written or recorded statement from any individual concerning the INCIDENT? If so, for each statement state:
(a) the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number ofthe individual from whom the statement was obtained;
(b) the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the individual who obtained the statement;
(c) (d)
the date the statement was obtained; and
the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of each PERSON who has the original statement or a copy.
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.3:
The District incorporates by this reference the Preliminary Statement and General Objections as though expressly set forth herein. The District objects to this Form
Interrogatory as improper because "characteristic of the Basin/aquifer," "safe yield" and
"overdraft" are not incidents. The District objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that
-7-
P6399-1234\1 069774v l.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0"- 12
a: '"
L. 0u
(. -'"'
-2 13
. z: "
o ~V) ~
14
i- 0
c: g:
$ ~ 15 - s:V) :S
o !;a: V1
c: ~ 16 I ~U 0
- I- 17 a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
it requests information protected by the attorney work product doctrine and attorney- client privilege. This Interrogatory is the subject of expert witness investigation and may be answered at the time such expert witness investigation is appropriately disclosed pursuant to Court Order and the Code of Civil Procedure
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.4:
Do YOU OR ANYONE ACTING ON YOUR BEHALF know of any
photographs, fims, or videotapes depicting any place, object, or individual concerning the INCIDENT or plaintiffs injuries? If so, state:
(a) (b) (c) (d)
the number of photographs or feet of fim or videotape;
the places, objects, or persons photographed, fimed, or videotaped;
the date the photographs, films, or videotapes were taken;
the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the individual taking the
photographs, fims, or videotapes; and
(e) the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of each PERSON who has the original or a copy of the photographs, fims, or videotapes.
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.4:
The District incorporates by this reference the Preliminary Statement and General Objections as though expressly set forth herein. The District objects to this Form
Interrogatory as improper because "characteristic of the Basin/aquifer," "safe yield" and
"overdraft" are not incidents. The District objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it requests information protected by the attorney work product doctrine and attorney- client privilege. This Interrogatory is the subject of expert witness investigation and may be answered at the time such expert witness investigation is appropriately disclosed pursuant to Court Order and the Code of Civil Procedure
-8-
P6399-1234\ I 069774v l.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o gi ;;
V) 0 12
a: g,
L. 0u
(. -'"'
-zz: " 13 a ~
V) ~ 14
i- 0
c: g:
$ ~ 15 - s:
V) :S
o !;
a: V1 16
c: ~I ~ U 0 17
- I-a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.5:
Do YOU OR ANYONE ACTING ON YOUR BEHALF know of any diagram, reproduction, or model of any place or thing (except for items developed by expert
witnesses covered by Code of Civil Procedure Section 2034) concerning the INCIDENT?
If so, for each item state:
(a) (b) (c)
the type (i.e., diagram, reproduction, or model);
the subject matter; and
the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of each PERSON who has it.
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.5:
The District incorporates by this reference the Preliminary Statement and General Objections as though expressly set forth herein. The District objects to this Form
Interrogatory as improper because "characteristic of the Basin/aquifer," "safe yield" and
"overdraft" are not incidents. The Distrct objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it requests information protected by the attorney work product doctrine and attorney- client privilege. This Interrogatory is the subject of expert witness investigation and may be answered at the time such expert witness investigation is appropriately disclosed pursuant to Court Order and the Code of Civil Procedure
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.6:
Was a report made by any PERSON concerning the INCIDENT? If so, state:
(a) the name, title, identification number, and employer of the PERSON who
made the report;
(b) (c)
the date and type of report made;
the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the PERSON for whom the
report was made; and
(d) the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of each PERSON who has the original or a copy of the report.
-9-
P6399-1234\1 069774v ¡.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0 12
a: g, L. 0u
(. -'"'
-z 13
z: "
a ~
V) ~ 14
~ æ
$ ~ 15 - s:
V) :S
o !;a: V1
c: ~ 16 I ~U 0
- I- 17 a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.6:
The District incorporates by this reference the Preliminary Statement and General Objections as though expressly set forth herein. The District objects to this Form
Interrogatory as improper because "characteristic of the Basin/aquifer," "safe yield" and
"overdraft" are not incidents. The District objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it requests information protected by the attorney work product doctrine and attorney- client privilege. This Interrogatory is the subject of expert witness investigation and may be answered at the time such expert witness investigation is appropriately disclosed pursuant to Court Order and the Code of Civil Procedure
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.7:
Have YOU OR ANYONE ACTING ON YOUR BEHALF inspected the scene of the INCIDENT? If so, for each inspection state:
(a) the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the individual making the inspection (except for expert witnesses covered by Code of Civil Procedure Section 2034); and
(b) the date of the inspection.
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 12.7:
The District incorporates by this reference the Preliminary Statement and General Objections as though expressly set forth herein. The District objects to this Form
Interrogatory as improper because "characteristic of the Basin/aquifer," "safe yield" and
"overdraft" are not incidents. The District objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it requests information protected by the attorney work product doctrine and attorney- client privilege. This Interrogatory is the subject of expert witness investigation and may be answered at the time such expert witness investigation is appropriately disclosed pursuant to Court Order and the Code of Civil Procedure
- 10-
P6399-1234\ 1 069774v l.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0"- 12
a: '"
L. 0u
(. -'"'
-zz: " 13 o ~
V) ~ 14
i- 0 c: g:
$ ~ 15 - s:V) :S
o !;a: V1 16 I ~c: ~
U 0 17
- I-a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 17.1:
Is your response to each request for admission served with these interrogatories an unqualified admission? If not, for each response that is not an unqualified admission:
(a) (b) (c)
state the number of the request;
state all facts upon which you base your response;
state the names, ADDRESSES, and telephone numbers of all PERSONS
who have knowledge of those facts; and
(d) identify all DOCUMENTS and other tangible things that support your responses and state the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the PERSON who has each DOCUMENT or thing.
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 17.1:
(a) 1,2,4,5,6.
(b) The Wilis Class is defined as people who do not pump and people who do not pump have no cognizable water rights to the extent that other parties prove prescriptive rights to groundwater in the Basin.
( c) Attorneys for Palmdale
(d) None.
(a) 3.
(b) This Interrogatory and Request for Admission are the subject of expert witness investigation and may be answered at the time such expert witness
investigation is appropriately disclosed pursuant to Court Order and the Code of Civil Procedure.
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale.
(d) None.
(a) 7,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19,20,30.
(b) Palmdale has never pumped groundwater from the basin.
( c) Attorneys for Palmdale; Michael 1. Mischel, Palmdale Director of Public Works.
- 11-
P6399-1234\1069774vl.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0a: g, 12
L. 0u
(. -'"'
-2z: " 13 o gV) ~
14
i- 0
c: g:
$ ~ 15 - s:
V) :S
o !;a: V1 c: ~ 16 I ~U 0
- I- 17
a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
(d) None.
(a) 8, 16,29.
(b) This request is the subject of expert witness study and/or testimony which has not yet been fully developed. See the expert witness report(s) yet to be
disclosed.
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale; Palmdale's expert witness(es).
(d) Expert witness report( s) yet to be disclosed.
(a) 21.
(b) This request is inapplicable to Palmdale because Palmdale does not claim any right of prescription against any other party. Palmdale has never pumped groundwater from the Basin.
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale; Michael 1. Mischel, Palmdale Director of Public Works.
(d) None.
(a) 22, 23, 24, 25, 37.
(b) These requests are inapplicable to Palmdale because Palmdale has never pumped groundwater from the Basin.
( c) Attorneys for Palmdale; Michael 1. Mischel, Palmdale Director of Public Works.
(d) None.
(a) 26.
(b) Palmdale denies this request because the failure of overlying users to produce water during a prescriptive period and thereby exercise self-help results in those overlying users' deprioritized water rights.
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale.
(d) None, other than relevant case law and legal authority.
(a) 27.
-12-
P6399-1234\1069774vl.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8
9 10
z: z 11 o g
i ;;
V) 0 12
a: g,
L. 0u
(. -'"'
-2 13
z: "
o ~
V) ~ 14
~ æ
$ ~ 15 - s:V) :S
o !;a: V1 16
c: ~I ~ U 0 17
- I-a: !;
~~ 18
~~
19 20
21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
(b) Palmdale denied this request because it is vague, ambiguous, and unintelligible
particularly regarding the term "use of water."
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale.
(d) None.
(a) 28.
(b) Palmdale denied this request because it is vague, ambiguous, and
unintelligible. No authority exists whereby a public entity may administer such a permitting system.
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale.
(d) None.
(a) 31,32.
(b) Case law provides that the gaining of a prescriptive right does not amount to a compensable taking.
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale.
(d) None, other than relevant case law and legal authority.
(a) 33.
(b) All parties are bound by the applicable provisions of the California Constitution.
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale.
(d) None, other than relevant case law and legal authority.
(a) 34.
(b) Palmdale' s use of water supplied by others is to provide water to public facilities, which benefits the health, safety, and welfare of Palmdale residents.
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale; Michael J. Mischel, Palmdale Director of Public
Works.
(a) 35,36
(b) Palmdale has never issued "will serve" letters.
-13-
P6399-1234\1 069774v l.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
o gz: z i ;;
g¿ ~
(. ;;L. 8
-2z: "
a ~
V) ~i- 0 c: g:
- s:$ ~ V) :S
o !;a: V1 c: ~I ~
u :=a: !;
~~~~
1
2
(c) Attorneys for Palmdale; Michael J. Mischel, Palmdale Director of Public
Works.
3
4
(d) None.
5 6
Dated: July 14,2008 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
A Professional Corporation JAMES L. MARKMAN
STEVEN ORR
WHIT Y . MC NALD
7 8 9 10
By: VEN R. RR~
Attorneys for Defendant, Cross- Complainant, and Cross-Defendant CITY OF PALMDALE
11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-14-
P6399-1234\ 1 069774v l.doc Response to Fonn Interrogatories (Set One)
1
2
PROOF OF SERVICE I, Kelley Herrington, declare:
I am a resident of the State of California and over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action; my business address is Richards, Watson & Gershon, 355 South 4 Grand Avenue, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071. On July 14, 2008, I served the within
documents:
3
5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORIES (SET NO. ONE)
o by causing facsimile transmission of the document(s) listed above from (213) 626-
0078 to the person(s) and facsimile number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 P.M. This transmission was reported as complete and without error. A copy
of the transmission report(s), which was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, is attached. Service by facsimile has been made pursuant to a prior written agreement between the parties.
. by posting the document(s) listed above to the Santa Clara County Superior Court website in regard to the Antelope Valley Groundwater matter.
by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope and affxing a pre- paid air bill, and causing the envelope to be delivered to an agent fordelivery, or deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained by , in an envelope or package designated by the express service carrer, with delivery fees paid or provided for, addressed to the person(s) at the addressees) set forth below.
o
o by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the addressees) set forth below.
by causing personal delivery by First Legal Support Services, 1511 West Beverly
Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90026 of the document(s) listed above to the
person( s) at the address( es) set forth below.
o
I declare under penalty of peijury under the laws of the State of California that the 19 above is true and correct.
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27 28
P6399\1 34\916886.1
Executed on July 14, 2008.