• No results found

(1,3 Benzo­[d]­dioxol 5 yl)(2 pyridyl)­methyl cyanide

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "(1,3 Benzo­[d]­dioxol 5 yl)(2 pyridyl)­methyl cyanide"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

o104

Andrew Duthieet al. C14H10N2O2 DOI: 101107/S1600536801000198 Acta Cryst.(2001). E57, o104±o105 Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports

Online

ISSN 1600-5368

(1,3-Benzo[

d

]dioxol-5-yl)(2-pyridyl)methyl cyanide

Andrew Duthie,aPeter

Scammells,aAndrew Katsifisb

and Edward R. T. Tiekinkc*

aCentre for Chiral and Molecular Technologies,

Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia,bRadiopharmaceuticals, ANSTO,

Private Bag 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia, and

cDepartment of Chemistry, The University of

Adelaide, Australia 5005

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators Single-crystal X-ray study T= 173 K

Mean(C±C) = 0.002 AÊ Rfactor = 0.039 wRfactor = 0.139

Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.7

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2001 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved

In the title compound, C14H10N2O2, the dihedral angle formed

between the substituted pyridine ring and 1,3-benzodioxole group is 67.73 (6). The crystal features chains of molecules

held together by alternating and CÐH interactions.

Comment

The title compound, (I), is an intermediate in the synthesis of potential cocaine antagonists. It was prepared by a nucleo-philic substitution reaction involving 2-bromopyridine and 1,3-benzodioxol-5-ylmethyl cyanide. The mean deviation of the atoms from the 1,3-benzodioxo group is 0.054 AÊ with the major deviation of 0.100 (2) AÊ associated with C2. The dihe-dral angle between this plane and that through the pyridyl group is 67.73 (6). Molecules associate in the crystal to form

chains held by alternating and CÐH interactions. Centrosymmetrically (1ÿx, 1ÿy, ÿz) related 1,3-benzo-dioxole groups are aligned so as to place the six-membered rings in close proximity. The distance separating the ring centroids is calculated to be 3.584 (2) AÊ (Spek, 1990). These pairs are capped on each sides by a symmetry related H50atom

(ÿx,ÿy,ÿz) which forms an interaction of the type CÐH with the C3a±C7a aromatic ring so that the H ring centroid separation is 2.73 AÊ and the angle at H50is 157.

Experimental

To a stirred suspension of 1.12 g (46.5 mmol) of NaH in dry THF (30 ml) under dry argon gas was added a solution of 5.00 g (161.2 mmol) of 3,4-(methylenedioxy)phenylacetonitrile and 4.90 g (31.0 mmol) of 2-bromopyridine in dry THF (30 ml). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h and then at re¯ux overnight. After cooling, the THF was removed and water (50 ml) added while cooling in an ice bath. The aqueous layer was extracted with 3

50 ml of EtOAc and the combined organic layer washed with water

(2)

and then extracted with 430 ml of 6MHCl solution. The combined aqueous layer was adjusted to pH 11 with 15% NaOH and extracted with 350 ml EtOAc. The organic layer was washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, ®ltered and the solvent removed in vacuo.

Column chromatography with EtOAc±hexane (1:4) gave 5.83 g (79%) of the title compound as a pale yellow powder with m.p. 338± 340 K.1H NMR (CDCl

3)5.22 (1H,s), 5.94 (2H,s), 6.78 (1H,d), 6.87

(1H,d), 6.91 (1H,dd), 7.24 (1H,ddd), 7.36 (1H,d), 7.69 (1H,ddd), 8.59 (1H,ddd).13C NMR (CDCl

3)44.9, 101.4, 108.1, 108.6, 119.0,

121.2, 121.8, 123.0, 128.2, 137.5, 147.7, 148.3, 149.9, 155.4. Analysis calculated for C14H10N2O2(238.24): C 70.58, H 4.23%; found: C 70.80,

H 4.20%. ES±MS [M+ H]+= 239.1. Crystals were obtained from the

slow evaporation of a CDCl3solution of the compound.

Crystal data

C14H10N2O2

Mr= 238.25 Triclinic,P1

a= 8.851 (2) AÊ

b= 11.435 (4) AÊ

c= 5.831 (1) AÊ = 94.42 (2) = 92.79 (2) = 107.65 (2)

V= 559.1 (3) AÊ3

Z= 2

Dx= 1.415 Mg mÿ3 MoKradiation Cell parameters from 25

re¯ections = 8.0±30.0 = 0.10 mmÿ1

T= 173 K Block, colourless 0.480.480.11 mm

Data collection

Rigaku AFC-7Rdiffractometer !±2scans

2731 measured re¯ections 2564 independent re¯ections 1911 re¯ections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.05

max= 27.5

h=ÿ11!11

k=ÿ14!14

l= 0!7

3 standard re¯ections every 400 re¯ections intensity decay: 0.2%

Re®nement

Re®nement onF2

R(F) = 0.039

wR(F2) = 0.139

S= 1.05 2564 re¯ections 163 parameters

H-atom parameters not re®ned

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.1P)2] whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3 (/)max< 0.001

max= 0.25 e AÊÿ3

min=ÿ0.25 e AÊÿ3

Data collection: MSC/AFC Diffractometer Control Software

(Molecular Structure Corporation, 1996); cell re®nement:MSC/AFC Diffractometer Control Software; data reduction: TEXSAN (Mole-cular Structure Corporation, 1997±1999); program(s) used to solve structure:SIR97 (Altomareet al., 1994); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication:TEXSAN.

The Australian Research Council is thanked for support.

References

Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994).J. Appl. Cryst.27, 435.

Johnson, C. K. (1976).ORTEPII. Report ORNL-5138. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.

Molecular Structure Corporation (1996).MSC/AFC Diffractometer Control Software.MSC, 3200 Research Forest Drive, The Woodlands, TX 77381, USA.

Molecular Structure Corporation (1997±1999). TEXSAN for Windows. Version 1.05. MSC, 3200 Research Forest Drive, The Woodlands, TX 77381, USA.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997).SHELXL97. University of GoÈttingen, Germany. Spek, A. L. (1990).Acta Cryst.A46, C-34.

Figure 1

(3)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, o104–o105

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, o104–o105 [doi:10.1107/S1600536801000198]

(1,3-Benzo[

d

]dioxol-5-yl)(2-pyridyl)methyl cyanide

Andrew Duthie, Peter Scammells, Andrew Katsifis and Edward R. T. Tiekink

S1. Comment

The title compound, (I), is an intermediate in the synthesis of potential cocaine antagonists. It was prepared by a nucleophilic substitution reaction involving 2-bromopyridine and 1,3-benzodioxo-5-ylmethyl cyanide. The mean deviation of the atoms from the 1,3-benzodioxo group is 0.054 Å with the major deviation of 0.100 (2) Å associated with C2. The dihedral angle between this plane and that through the pyridyl group is 67.73 (6)°. Molecules associate in the crystal to form chains held by alternating π···π and C—H···π interactions. Centrosymmetrically (1 - x, 1 - y, -z) related 1,3-benzodioxo groups are aligned so as to place the six-membered rings in close proximity. The distance separating the ring centroids is calculated to be 3.584 (2) Å (Spek, 1990). These pairs are capped on each sides by a symmetry related H5′ atom (-x, -y, -z) which -forms an interaction of the type C–H···π with the C3a–C7a aromatic ring so that the H···ring centroid separation is 2.73 Å and the angle at H5′ is 157°.

S2. Experimental

To a stirred suspension of 1.12 g (46.5 mmol) of NaH in dry THF (30 ml) under dry argon gas was added a solution of 5.00 g (161.2 mmol) of 3,4-(methylenedioxy)phenylacetonitrile and 4.90 g (31.0 mmol) of 2-bromopyridine in dry THF (30 ml). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h and then at reflux overnight. After cooling, the THF was removed and water (50 ml) added while cooling in an ice bath. The aqueous layer was extracted with 3 × 50 ml of EtOAc and the combined organic layer washed with water and then extracted with 4 × 30 ml of 6M HCl solution. The combined aqueous layer was adjusted to pH 11 with 15% NaOH and extracted with 3 × 50 ml EtOAc. The organic layer was washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent removed in vacuo. Column chromatography with EtOAc–

hexane (1:4) gave 5.83 g (79%) of the title compound as a pale yellow powder with m.p. 338–340 K. 1H NMR (CDCl 3) δ

5.22 (1H, s), 5.94 (2H, s), 6.78 (1H, d), 6.87 (1H, d), 6.91 (1H, dd), 7.24 (1H, ddd), 7.36 (1H, d), 7.69 (1H, ddd), 8.59 (1H, ddd). 13C NMR (CDCl

3) δ 44.9, 101.4, 108.1, 108.6, 119.0, 121.2, 121.8, 123.0, 128.2, 137.5, 147.7, 148.3, 149.9,

155.4. Analysis calculated for C14H10N2O2 (238.24): C 70.58, H 4.23%; found: C 70.80, H 4.20%. ES—MS [M + H]+ =

(4)
[image:4.610.188.420.67.519.2]

Figure 1

The molecular structure of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level (Johnson, 1976).

(I)

Crystal data

C14H10N2O2

Mr = 238.25

Triclinic, P1

a = 8.851 (2) Å

b = 11.435 (4) Å

c = 5.831 (1) Å

α = 94.42 (2)°

β = 92.79 (2)°

γ = 107.65 (2)°

Z = 2

F(000) = 248

Dx = 1.415 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.7107 Å Cell parameters from 25 reflections

θ = 8.0–30.0°

µ = 0.10 mm−1

(5)

supporting information

sup-3

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, o104–o105 Data collection

Rigaku AFC-7R diffractometer

Radiation source: rotating anode Graphite monochromator

ω–2θ scans

2731 measured reflections 2564 independent reflections 1911 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.050

θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.5°

h = −11→11

k = −14→14

l = 0→7

3 standard reflections every 400 reflections intensity decay: 0.2%

Refinement

Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039

wR(F2) = 0.139

S = 1.05 2564 reflections 163 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters not refined

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.1P)2]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001

Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3

Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used

only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2

are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

O1 0.19247 (14) 0.58173 (10) −0.00247 (19) 0.0375 (3) O3 0.13809 (14) 0.46384 (10) −0.35548 (18) 0.0386 (3) N1′ 0.19430 (14) 0.02168 (11) −0.2951 (2) 0.0296 (3) N1′′ 0.57051 (15) 0.18918 (12) −0.4895 (2) 0.0350 (3) C1 0.42803 (15) 0.17724 (11) −0.1053 (2) 0.0238 (3)

H1 0.5083 0.1830 0.0252 0.029*

C1′′ 0.50785 (15) 0.18228 (12) −0.3225 (2) 0.0266 (3) C2 0.13269 (19) 0.57686 (13) −0.2365 (3) 0.0343 (3) H2A 0.1986 0.6481 −0.3105 0.041* H2B 0.0220 0.5799 −0.2420 0.041* C2′ 0.29507 (15) 0.05452 (11) −0.1064 (2) 0.0229 (3) C3′ 0.27971 (17) −0.01189 (12) 0.0840 (2) 0.0282 (3)

H3′ 0.3547 0.0149 0.2142 0.034*

C3A 0.22371 (16) 0.41604 (12) −0.2071 (2) 0.0258 (3) C4 0.27607 (15) 0.31587 (12) −0.2512 (2) 0.0248 (3)

(6)

C4′ 0.15207 (18) −0.11859 (13) 0.0801 (3) 0.0323 (3) H4′ 0.1385 −0.1670 0.2073 0.039* C5 0.36395 (15) 0.28657 (11) −0.0692 (2) 0.0226 (3) C5′ 0.04548 (17) −0.15317 (12) −0.1110 (3) 0.0319 (3) H5′ −0.0438 −0.2252 −0.1174 0.038* C6′ 0.07089 (17) −0.08098 (13) −0.2933 (3) 0.0328 (3) H6′ −0.0032 −0.1054 −0.4247 0.039* C6 0.39230 (16) 0.35490 (12) 0.1439 (2) 0.0261 (3)

H6 0.4504 0.3322 0.2648 0.031*

C7 0.33715 (17) 0.45677 (13) 0.1851 (2) 0.0284 (3)

H7 0.3560 0.5035 0.3313 0.034*

C7A 0.25502 (16) 0.48561 (12) 0.0046 (2) 0.0267 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

O1 0.0475 (7) 0.0333 (6) 0.0375 (6) 0.0211 (5) 0.0073 (5) 0.0013 (4) O3 0.0516 (7) 0.0420 (6) 0.0327 (6) 0.0311 (5) −0.0017 (5) 0.0033 (5) N1′ 0.0298 (6) 0.0271 (6) 0.0291 (6) 0.0053 (5) −0.0047 (5) 0.0044 (5) N1′′ 0.0326 (7) 0.0406 (7) 0.0346 (7) 0.0136 (6) 0.0054 (5) 0.0087 (5) C1 0.0228 (6) 0.0243 (6) 0.0246 (6) 0.0074 (5) −0.0010 (5) 0.0048 (5) C1′′ 0.0234 (6) 0.0256 (6) 0.0317 (7) 0.0089 (5) −0.0015 (5) 0.0052 (5) C2 0.0374 (8) 0.0318 (7) 0.0392 (8) 0.0168 (6) 0.0094 (6) 0.0086 (6) C2′ 0.0229 (6) 0.0222 (6) 0.0254 (6) 0.0097 (5) 0.0013 (5) 0.0029 (5) C3′ 0.0316 (7) 0.0272 (7) 0.0270 (7) 0.0105 (6) 0.0013 (5) 0.0053 (5) C3A 0.0249 (6) 0.0274 (6) 0.0261 (6) 0.0086 (5) 0.0026 (5) 0.0063 (5) C4 0.0252 (6) 0.0249 (6) 0.0238 (6) 0.0071 (5) 0.0008 (5) 0.0022 (5) C4′ 0.0385 (8) 0.0285 (7) 0.0332 (7) 0.0122 (6) 0.0100 (6) 0.0109 (6) C5 0.0201 (6) 0.0208 (6) 0.0253 (6) 0.0031 (5) 0.0017 (5) 0.0050 (5) C5′ 0.0265 (7) 0.0227 (6) 0.0457 (9) 0.0054 (5) 0.0079 (6) 0.0034 (6) C6′ 0.0289 (7) 0.0294 (7) 0.0370 (8) 0.0057 (6) −0.0043 (6) 0.0020 (6) C6 0.0249 (6) 0.0275 (6) 0.0236 (6) 0.0038 (5) 0.0013 (5) 0.0055 (5) C7 0.0295 (7) 0.0276 (6) 0.0249 (6) 0.0039 (5) 0.0056 (5) 0.0002 (5) C7A 0.0254 (7) 0.0233 (6) 0.0319 (7) 0.0067 (5) 0.0091 (5) 0.0043 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O1—C7A 1.3748 (17) C2′—C3′ 1.3819 (18)

O1—C2 1.430 (2) C3′—C4′ 1.387 (2)

O3—C3A 1.3720 (16) C3A—C4 1.3717 (19) O3—C2 1.4339 (18) C3A—C7A 1.384 (2) N1′—C2′ 1.3359 (18) C4—C5 1.4055 (18) N1′—C6′ 1.3404 (18) C4′—C5′ 1.375 (2) N1′′—C1′′ 1.1403 (19) C5—C6 1.3853 (19) C1—C1′′ 1.4765 (19) C5′—C6′ 1.382 (2)

C1—C5 1.5264 (18) C6—C7 1.402 (2)

(7)

supporting information

sup-5

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, o104–o105

Figure

Figure 1

References

Related documents