• No results found

CR LAURENCE CO., INC ACOUSTICAL PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CR LAURENCE CO., INC ACOUSTICAL PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CR LAURENCE CO.,

INC

ACOUSTICAL

PERFORMANCE

TEST REPORT

SCOPE OF WORK

ASTM E90 SOUND TRANSMISSION LOSS TESTING ON A PALISADES S90, BI-FOLDING

DOOR

REPORT NUMBER

L3944.02-303-11-R0

TEST DATE

11/23/20

ISSUE DATE

12/29/20

PAGES

20

DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER

(2)

This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement CR LAURENCE CO., INC

2100 East 38th Street Vernon, California 90058 SECTION 1

SCOPE

Intertek Building & Construction (B&C) was contracted by CR Laurence Co., Inc to conduct a sound transmission loss test. Results obtained are tested values and were secured by using the designated test methods. The complete test data is included herein. The client provided the test specimen. All measurements were conducted in the HT test chambers at Intertek B&C located in Lake Forest, California.

This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement by this laboratory. Intertek B&C will service this report for the entire test record retention period. The test record retention period ends four years after the test date. Test records, such as detailed drawings, datasheets, representative samples of test specimens, or other pertinent project documentation, will be retained for the entire test record retention period.

For INTERTEK B&C:

COMPLETED BY: Marco T Santa Rosa REVIEWED BY: Leeland S Hoover TITLE:

Technician III

Acoustical Testing TITLE:

Laboratory Manager Acoustical Testing

SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE:

DATE: 01/22/21 DATE: 01/22/21

(3)

SECTION 2

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

SERIES/MODEL Palisades S90

TYPE Bi-Folding Door

GLAZING (Nominal Dimensions) 1" IG (3/16" Tempered Exterior, 9/16" Air Space, 1/4"

Laminated Interior) Glass temperature 75oF DATA FILE NO. L3944.01B

STC 36

OITC 29

SECTION 3

TEST METHODS

The specimens were evaluated in accordance with the following:

ASTM E90-09 (2016), Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Sound

Transmission Loss of Building Partitions and Elements

ASTM E413-16, Classification for Rating Sound Insulation

ASTM E1332-16, Standard Classification for Rating Outdoor-Indoor Sound Attenuation ASTM E2235-04 (2012), Standard Test Method for Determination of Decay Rates for Use in

Sound Insulation Test Methods

SECTION 4

SPECIMEN INSTALLATION

A sound transmission loss test was initially performed on a filler wall.

(4)

SECTION 5

EQUIPMENT

(5)

SECTION 6

LIST OF OFFICIAL OBSERVERS

NAME COMPANY

Roman Aguiniga CR Laurence

Roman Jimenez CR Laurence

Marco Santa Rosa Intertek B&C

Leeland Hoover Intertek B&C

SECTION 7

TEST PROCEDURE

The sensitivity of the microphones was checked before measurements were conducted. The transmission loss values were obtained for a single direction of measurement.

Two background noise sound pressure level and five sound absorption measurements were conducted at each of five microphone positions.

Two sound pressure level measurements were made simultaneously in receive and source rooms at each of five microphone positions.

The air temperature and relative humidity conditions were monitored and recorded during all measurements.

Data for flanking limit tests, repeatability measurements, and reference specimen tests are available upon request.

(6)

SECTION 8

ACOUSTICAL TEST CALCULATIONS

Transmission loss (TL) at each 1/3 octave frequency is the average source room sound pressure level minus the average receive room sound pressure level, plus, 10 times the log of the specimen area divided by the sound absorption of the receive room with the sample in place.

STC Rating

To obtain the Sound Transmission Class (STC), read the TL of the contour curve at 500 Hz. The sum of the deficiencies below the contour curve must not exceed 32. The maximum deficiency at any one frequency must not exceed 8.

OITC Rating

(7)

SECTION 9

SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION

FRAME BOTTOM SASH TOP SASH

SIZE 75-1/2" by 82-1/2" 33-3/4" by 78-1/2" 33-3/4" by 78-1/2"

THICKNESS 3-3/4" 3-1/2" 3-1/2"

CORNERS Coped Mitered Mitered

FASTENERS Screws Screws Screws

SEAL METHOD Silicone Silicone Silicone

MATERIAL Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum

REINFORCEMENT N/A N/A N/A

THERMAL BREAK MATERIAL Insulbar Insulbar Insulbar

DAYLIGHT OPENING SIZE (X2) N/A 31” by 75-7/8” 31” by 75-7/8”

MEASURED OVERALL INSULATION GLASS UNIT THICKNESS 1.038"

SPACER TYPE Aluminum box

EXTERIOR SHEET GAP INTERIOR SHEET MEASURED THICKNESS 0.184" 0.600” 0.113", 0.028”, 0.113”

MUNTIN PATTERN N/A N/A N/A

MATERIAL Tempered Air* Laminated

LAMINATE MATERIAL N/A N/A PVB

GLAZING METHOD Interior

GLAZING MATERIAL Rubber foam gasket

(8)

TYPE QUANTITY LOCATION WEATHERSTRIP 1/8” Felt covered hollow

bulb gasket with 1/8” leaf

1 Row Perimeter of frame

3/4" rubber post gasket with 3/8” leaf

1 Row Jambs

3/4" rubber post gasket with 3/8” leaf

2 Rows Posts

3/8” hollow bulb 1 Row Top and bottom rail

on exterior of panels 1+2 0.187” by 0.310” Polypile

gasket

1 Row Head

1/8” Hollow foam gasket 2 Row Vertical door panel

stile

1/8”Hollow foam gasket 2 Row Even supplement

(post)

1/8” hollow foam gasket 1 Row Top and bottom rail

on interior of panels 1+2

HARDWARE Latch lock with pin 1 Lateral hinge jamb

Hinges 20 Jambs, posts,

panels

DRAINAGE 1-3/4” by 1/4" Weep slots

4 Sill

TOTAL WEIGHT (lbs) AVERAGE WEIGHT (lbs/ft2)

318 7.35

* - Stated per Client/Manufacturer, N/A-Not Applicable

Photographs are included in Section 11.

(9)

SECTION 10

(10)
(11)

SECTION 11

PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo No. 1

Source Room View of Test Specimen

(12)

SECTION 12

(13)
(14)

@ EACH

ADJUSTABLE

(15)
(16)

@ EACH

ADJUSTABLE

(17)
(18)
(19)

GLAZING

HARDWARE / MISC

WEATHERSTRIP / GASKET

PANEL COMPONENTS

(20)

REVISION LOG

REVISION # DATE PAGES REVISION

References

Related documents

If this technology can be put into practical use, every bulb can be used something like a Wi-Fi hotspot to transmit wireless data and we will proceed toward the cleaner,

The two-way interaction between TMS site (hand vs. lip) and video type (hand action vs. mouth action) for hit rate provides evidence that the premotor hand area plays a causal

These include: a reduction in the strength of the horseshoe vortex at formation, a larger radial migration of secondary flow, a subsequent increased interaction between the

& Blissett J., The Montreal Children’s Hospital Feeding Scale: Relationships with parental report of child eating behaviours and observed feeding interactions, Appetite

Creativity involves not only initial idea generation, but the succeeding phases of idea evaluation, idea selection, and idea implementation (Mumford, Medeiros, & Partlow,

in analyzing the controversy surrounding the proposed border wall because it highlights overlapping interests between many different racial groups that otherwise may be missed. As

Semantic Model Application Meta-Data etc CopyBook XSD API LIPA ESM Reference Model Reference Model Reference Model Reference Model Reference Base Model Reference

ESTATE OF MOTA VS. SERRA Case Digest ESTATE OF MOTA VS. It was covenanted that the parties should pay this amount in equal parts and the plaintiffs were entrusted