arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 31 Oct 2009

arXiv:0911.0114v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 31 Oct 2009

Stream w ise oscillation of spanw ise velocity

at the w all of a channel for turbulent drag reduction

C laudio V iotti¹ and M aurizio Q uadrio¹

1D ipartim ento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale delPolitecnico di M ilano via La M asa 34 - 20156 M ilano, Italy

Paolo Luchini²

2D ipartim ento di Ingegneria M eccanica U niversita di Salerno 84084 Fisciano (SA ), Italy

(D ated: July 14,2021)

A bstract

Steady forcing at the w allofa channel ow is studied via D N S to assess its ability ofyielding reductions of turbulent friction drag. T he w all forcing consists of a stationary distribution of spanw ise velocity that alternates in the stream w ise direction. T he idea behind the forcing builds upon the existing technique ofthe spanw ise w alloscillation,and exploits the convective nature of the ow to achieve an unsteady interaction w ith turbulence.

T he analysis takes advantage ofthe equivalent lam inar ow ,that is solved analytically to show thatthe energetic cost ofthe forcing is una ected by turbulence. In a turbulent ow ,the alternate forcing is found to behave sim ilarly to the oscillating w all;in particular an optim alw avelength is found thatyieldsa m axim alreduction ofturbulentdrag. T he energetic perform ance issigni cantly im proved,w ith m ore than 50% ofm axim um friction saving at large intensities ofthe forcing,and a net energetic saving of23% for sm aller intensities.

Such a steady,w all-based forcing m ay pave the w ay to passively interacting w ith the turbulent ow to achieve drag reduction through a suitable distribution of roughness,designed to excite a selected stream w ise w avelength.

I. IN T R O D U C T IO N

In recentyearsseveralattem ptsatcontrolling turbulence through a num berofwall-based forcing m ethods have been reported [1],often aim ed at frictionaldrag reduction (D R ).A large num ber of works, exploiting both num ericaland experim entalapproaches, has been devoted to this goal.

In this paper we focus on spanw ise wall-based forcing,i.e. on a class offorcing m ethods designed to m odify favorably the turbulent ow by introducing an externalaction directed in the spanw ise direction. Early work addressing the m odi cation of wall turbulence by creating a cross ow can be traced back to B radshaw & Pontikos [2]. Spanw ise forcing of turbulent ow s has been reviewed by K arniadakis & C hoi[3]. In 1992,Jung,M angiavacchi

& A khavan [4]introduced the spanw ise-oscillating walltechnique,w here the wallofa fully turbulentchannel ow issubjectto an alternate harm onic m otion in the spanw ise direction.

IfW indicatesthe spanw ise velocity com ponentatthe wall,the law thatde nesthisforcing m ethod is:

W = A sin 2

T t (1)

w here tistim e,and A and T are the oscillation am plitude and period,respectively. O nce A and T are setw ithin the optim um range from the view pointofD R perform ance,the authors observed, by m eans of direct num erical sim ulations (D N S), that a strong suppression of turbulence occurs in the wallregion, accom panied by a signi cant reduction of the m ean friction.

T he analysis has been carried on in successive studies: we recallQ uadrio & Sibilla [5]

for the pipe ow ,and J.-I.C hoi,X u & Sung [6]and Q uadrio & R icco [7,8],as D N S-based analyses w hich contributed new datasets and detailed descriptions ofthe ow . Laboratory experim ents,due to Laadharietal. [9]and K .S.C hoi[10,11],com plem ented the num erical works and addressed the issue ofdependency ofD R on the value ofthe R eynolds num ber.

A lltogether these works have contributed to dem onstrating that the naturalfriction drag of the turbulent ow can be reduced (at least at m oderate values of R e) up to 45% for A⁺ 25 (quantitiesw ith the⁺ superscriptare m ade dim ensionless w ith viscouswallunits).

A n optim alvalue ofthe oscillation period exists,nam ely T_opt⁺ = 100 125,that yields the m axim um D R at allam plitudes. T he net energy saving,that substracts from the reduced

ow -driving pum ping power the power expense required to m ove the wallagainst viscous

resistance,has been addressed rst by B aron and Q uadrio [12],and today it is recognized [3]thatitcan reach up to 10% . C rediting a com m only accepted qualitative explanation,the transverse oscillating boundary layerinduced by thewallm otion explainsthedrag reduction, since itproducesa phase displacem entbetween the wall-layerturbulence structures,capable of weakening the viscous wallcycle. W hen phase-averaged, this tim e-alternating layer in the turbulent regim e has been found to coincide w ith the oscillating lam inar Stokes layer, forw hich an analytic solution isknow n asa classic solution ofthe boundary layerequations [13]. T hishasbeen recently exploited to determ ine a param eter[8]thatiscapable ofscaling linearly w ith D R and thus m akes it possible to predict D R capabilities.

A dvantages and draw backs of the oscillating-wall technique are obvious. It presents energetic perform ance that could m ake it worth ofpracticalim plem entations, and thanks to its open-loop character it does not need distributed sensors or actuators,that would be stillunpracticalw ith the technology available today. O n the other hand,by its very nature this technique requires m oving parts,and thus does not lend itselfto be im plem ented as a passive device,w hich is on the other hand the m ost appealing possibility application-w ise.

In this paper, we aim at extending the oscillating-wall technique, to take one further step towards the long-term objective ofa successfulpracticalim plem entation;in particular we want to translate the tim e-dependent forcing law expressed by Eq.(1) into a stationary form ula. T his goal can be achieved by exploiting the convective nature of wall-bounded ow s. T hough at the wallthe m ean velocity pro le annihilates,it is wellknow n that the convection velocity of a turbulent wall ow (or,m ore precisely, the convection velocity of turbulent uctuations)resem bles the m ean velocity pro le only in the bulk ofthe ow . K im

& H ussain [14] have show n som e years ago that near the wall, say below y⁺ = 15, the convection velocity becom es essentially independent upon the wall distance, and rem ains constant atthe value U_w⁺ 10. It is this near-wallvalue ofthe convection velocity that w ill enable us to translate the tem poralforcing from Eq.(1) into a spatially-oscillating forcing, yielding the follow ing forcing law that is expected to m odify the turbulent ow in a sim ilar m anner to the oscillating wall:

W = A sin 2

x

x : (2)

H ere x denotes the stream w ise coordinate,and _x is the forcing wavelength. T he result- ing distribution ofspanw ise wallvelocity is sketched in g.1,w here the coordinate system

y

z x

Flow

W=Asin(k x)

FIG .1: Sketch ofthe w allspanw ise forcing discussed in the present w ork.

em ployed in this paper is also indicated.

T hough the controllaw (2) has never been considered in the literature,one paper w here a sim ilar space-tim e extension has been discussed in the past is the one by B erger and coworkers [15]. In a param etric D N S-based study a spanw ise-oriented Lorentz volum e force was sim ulated to obtain the follow ing two forcing con gurations:

F_z= B e ^y= sin 2

T t ; (3)

F_z = B e ^y= sin 2

x

x ; (4)

w here is the penetration depth ofthe forcing,and B its intensity. For certain values of the param eters,the stream w ise-dependent law (4)produced a D R com parable to thatofthe tim e-dependent law (3),w ith the added bene t ofan im proved energetic balance. H owever, the di erence between a body force and a wall-based forcing is substantial,as discussed for exam ple by Zhao et al. [16],and no de nite conclusion can thus be draw n a priorifrom the study by B erger et al. [15]w ith respect to the oscillating velocity,w hich is strictly a wall- based forcing. Indeed,it w illbe show n later that som e ofthe results described in R ef. [15]

(for exam ple the existence ofan optim alwavelength that depends on the forcing intensity) do not apply at allto the type offorcing considered here. Schoppa & H ussain [17]showed that a signi cant am ount of drag reduction can be achieved by introducing in a channel

ow a spanw ise velocity gradient,generated in the D N S by a large-scale,stream w ise-aligned

and x-independent rolls. Such velocity gradient weakens the near-wallcycle by suppressing the transient grow th of streaks that would otherw ise be stable according to norm al-m ode analysis. T his m echanism is then addressed in a subsequent paper [18],w here the role of stream w ise-varying spanw ise perturbations is highlighted in the context ofthe turbulence regeneration cycle. T he dom inant wavelength of the streak waviness is found to be very sim ilarto the stream w ise length ofthe coherentstructures educed from conditionalanalysis ofturbulent ow elds [19],nam ely about 300{400 viscous units.

A im of the present paper is to investigate the D R and energetic perform ance of the steady controllaw (2). T hanks to an accurate data set,purposely obtained by severalD N S sim ulations,the _x A param eterspace w illbeexplored in detail.T he valueoftheR eynolds num ber w illbe xed at R e = 200 (based on the friction velocity ofthe reference ow and half the channelgap);any dependence on this ow param eter is not discussed here. T he e ects ofthe forcing (2) on a lam inar channel ow w illbe prelim inarly studied. W e w illsee that a lam inar solution, although approxim ated, can be obtained in analyticalform , and this solution w illthen be used to help understanding the D R properties ofthe forcing (2) w hen used on a turbulent ow . In the end, we w ill be able to connect this forcing to a physicalapplication that does not necessarily involve a m oving wall.

T he paper is organized as follow s. Sec.II contains a theoreticaldiscussion ofthe associ- ated lam inar ow ,that is usefulfor predicting som e ofthe energetic characteristics ofthe presenttechnique (furtheranalyticaldetailsare deferred to an A ppendix). In Sec.IIIthe nu- m ericalsim ulations ofthe turbulent case and their discretization param eters are described.

R esultsaboutD R and energetic perform ancesare reported and discussed in Sec.IV ,together w ith a visualand statisticaldescription ofthe forced ow ,com pared to the reference unper- turbed one. Som e conclusive rem arks,including exam ples ofhow the present forcing can be im plem ented in practice,are given in the concluding Sec.V .

II. L A M IN A R F L O W

W e consider rst the lam inar ow in a plane channel subject to either the tem poral boundary forcing (1)orthe spatialboundary forcing (2).Forthe tem poralcase,itiseasy to show thatthe incom pressible m om entum equation forthe spanw ise com ponentw decouples, so that the stream w ise ow is described by the classic Poiseuille parabolic solution, and

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0

0.25 y/h

t/T

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 0.25

y/h

x/λ_x

FIG . 2: C ontour of the w eld for the lam inar T SL and SSL. Top: tem poral forcing w (0;t) = sin(!t). B ottom : spatial forcing w (0;x) = sin( x). C ontours at ( 0:45;0:1;0:45), dashed lines indicate negative values.

the entire ow consists in this parabolic pro le plus a spanw ise alternating m otion,that is identicalto the oscillating transversalboundary layer that develops in a still uid bounded by a wall subject to harm onic oscillation (i.e. the so-called Stokes second problem , that possesses a classic analyticalsolution [13]). T his oscillating boundary layer w illbe called Tem poralStokes Layer (T SL) in the follow ing.

W e address now the lam inar ow subject to the space-varying boundary forcing (2),to de ne and discussthe spatialequivalent ofthe T SL,thatw illbe called SpatialStokesLayer (SSL).W e leave som e analyticaldetails to A ppendix V II,but the m ain ideas are given here as follow s.

In both the T SL and SSL,the eld ofthe spanw ise velocity com ponentw isa function of two independent variables,nam ely t;y for T SL and x;y for the SSL.W e start by observing in g.2 how closely these w elds for T SL and SSL resem ble each other. T he abscissa in g.2 ist=T forthe T SL,w hereasitischanged to x= _xforthe SSL.B oth eldsare com puted w ith the D N S code,although the analyticalexpression ofthe form er is available [13]:

w(t;y)= C_t< e^{i! t}e ^y=t ; (5)

w here C_t is a (real) norm alization constant, ! = 2 =T is the angular frequency of the

oscillation and _tis the thickness ofthe T SL,de ned as:

t=

!

1=2

: (6)

Figure 2, w here the param eters T and _x are in the range of interest for turbulent D R purposes, illustrates the wall-norm al structure of the T SL and the SSL. W ithin this param eter range,both Stokes layers are thin com pared to the channelhalf-w idth h. T he convection velocity being approxim ately constant over such a sm allwall-norm alextension explains w hy the two contours in gure 2 look very sim ilar.

A n analyticalsolution for the SSL can be arrived at under the sm allthickness approx- im ation. A fter som e analyticale orts,described in the A ppendix,the w (x;y) eld ofthe lam inar SSL can be show n to obey an expression,sim ilar to Eq.(5),that contains an A iry function instead ofan exponentialfunction:

w(x;y)= C_x< e^{i x}A i iy

x

e ⁱ⁴⁼³ ; (7)

w here C_x isa (real)norm alization constant, = 2 = _x isthe forcing wavenum ber,A iisthe A iry function ofthe rst kind [20],and _x is the thickness ofthe SSL,de ned as:

x = u_y;0

1=3

: (8)

In this expression, u_y;0 represents the gradient of the stream w ise m ean velocity pro le evaluated at the wall. T he w (x;y) lam inar eld com puted by D N S and plotted in g.2 (bottom ) is virtually indistinguishable from the sam e eld as com puted from the analytical solution (7).

C om paring the two expressions (5)and (7),a qualitative di erence between the SSL and the classicalT SL can be observed: the form er is not decoupled from the longitudinalm ean velocity pro le u(y), but it depends on u_y;0 through the thickness _x given by (8). T his rem ainsw ithoutconsequences in the lam inarcase,w here the stream w ise ow isnota ected by the wallforcing,w hereas it w illbecom e im portant in the turbulent case.

A . C om parison w ith the m ean spanw ise turbulent ow

It is welldocum ented [7]for the tim e-oscillating wallthat the phase-averaged hw i_xz(y) pro le isidenticalto thelam inarsolution expressed by Eq.(5),exceptforthe initialtransient

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

-0.5 0 0.5 1

y / δ t

hwi _xz /A

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

-0.5 0 0.5 1

y / δ x

hwi _tz /A

FIG .3: C om parison betw een lam inarand turbulentm ean w eldsfortem poraland spatialforcing.

Left: analyticalsolution (lines) ofthe T SL and turbulenthw i_xz eld (sym bols) com puted by D N S.

R ight: analyticalsolution (lines)ofthe SSL and turbulenthw i_tz eld (sym bols)com puted by D N S.

Pro les are taken at di erent (tem poraland spatial) phases during the oscillation. T he lam inar solutions are linear in A , w hereas the turbulent pro les are for A⁺ = 12. Turbulent tem poral case is at R e = 200 and T⁺ = 125. Turbulent spatial case is at R e = 200 and ⁺_x = 1250.

To em phasize collapse w ith proper scaling,the SSL analyticalsolution is com puted for a di erent w avelength,nam ely ⁺_x = 1900,yielding a di erent _x,so thatthe role ofy=_x assim ilarity variable is highlighted.

w here the oscillation is started from rest. (T he operator h i_xz indicates averaging along the hom ogeneous directions x and z.) T his is well illustrated by g.3 (left), w here the wall- norm aldistribution of w in the T SL after Eq.(5) is plotted at various phases during the cycle,and com pared w ith the turbulent hw i_xz eld. T he agreem ent,w hich has been related

by R icco & Q uadrio [21]to the vanishing y;z com ponentofthe R eynolds stresses tensor,is, as expected,excellent.

T he sam e resultisshow n in g.3 (right)to hold true forthe SSL case. N ow ,ofcourse,the analyticalsolution (7)hasto be com pared w ith the turbulenthw i_tz eld. T he role ofy= _tas sim ilarity variable iswellknow n forthe T SL.To em phasize thaty= _xplaysthe sam e role for the SSL,the com parison between lam inarand turbulent pro les is carried out fortwo cases w ith di erent and thus,according to (8),w ith di erent _x. T he agreem ent between the two pro les is excellent. T his con rm s the analogy between T SL and SSL in term s ofthe connection between the lam inar solution and the phase-averaged turbulent solution. T his analogy can be used (see IV )to increase ourpredictive capabilities w hen the spatialforcing (2) is applied to a turbulent ow .

III. N U M E R IC A L M E T H O D F O R D N S O F T U R B U L E N T F L O W

W e turn now to the turbulentcase,thatw illbe dealtw ith by using the D irectN um erical Sim ulation (D N S) technique. T he com puter code used to solve the incom pressible N avier{

Stokes equations is a parallelD N S solver,based on m ixed discretization (Fourier expansion in the hom ogeneous directions, and com pact fourth-order accurate explicit com pact nite di erence schem es in the wall-norm aldirection),recently developed by Luchiniand Q uadrio [22]. T he turbulent ow in an inde nite plane channelis considered, w ith gap half-w idth given by h. O ne reference sim ulation w ithout forcing has been carried out at R e = 200, w here R e is the friction R eynolds num ber,de ned based on h and the friction velocity u , that w illbe used as reference velocity throughout the paper unless otherw ise noted. T he size ofthe com putationaldom ain is L_x = 6 h,L_y = 2h and L_z= 3 h. T he totalaveraging tim e is rather large, to allow for well converged tim e-averaged results, and am ounts to approxim ately 10⁴ viscous tim e units. T he em ployed num ber of m odes / points is given by N_x = 320, N_y = 160 and N_z = 320, that yields a standard spatial resolution. For the reference sim ulation a value ofC_f = 7:94 10³ (de ned based on the bulk velocity) is obtained,in agreem ent w ith the correlation C_f = 0:0336R e ^0:273 given by Pope [23].

Som e 40 sim ulations w ith Eq.(2) used as boundary condition at the channelwalls have been then carried out for di erent values of _x and A . O w ing to the periodic boundary conditionsem ployed in thehom ogeneousdirections,an integernum berofforcing wavelength

x m ust be contained in the dom ain length L_x. T he system atic variation of _x has thus required, m ostly for the largest values of _x, slight adjustm ents of L_x. C om pared to the reference value of L_x = 6 h, 3 cases had an actual value of L_x = 7 h, and one was at L_x = 5 h. Since such changesare oflim ited entity,the num berofstream w ise Fourierm odes has been left unchanged, w ith the im plied little change in stream w ise spatial resolution for these few cases. Properly accounting for the initial transient, w here the wall friction decreases from the unperturbed value to the reduced value given by the forcing,is enforced according to the procedure described by Q uadrio & R icco [8],w ho reported an overallerror in determ ining the friction coe cient below 1% . W e have also veri ed that the results are not a ected by the chosen value of L_x. O ne sim ulation w ith ⁺_x = 1875 and large D R has been repeated by doubling L_x at L_x = 12 h (and of course doubling the num ber of stream w ise Fourier m odes). T he value of C_f m easured in the sim ulation w ith the longer dom ain di ers from the one com puted by the sim ulation w ith standard dom ain length by m uch less than the error,m entioned above,related to the nite averaging tim e.

T he sim ulations were run on a com puting system available in dedicated m ode at the U niversita diSalerno, taking advantage of its large com puting throughput to run several cases at a tim e. T he system possesses 64 com puting nodes, each of w hich is equipped w ith two dual-core A M D O pteron C PU s. T he single com putational case took about 10 days of wall-clock tim e w hen run in parallelby using 8 nodes. U p to 8 cases can be run sim ultaneously,so that the wall-clock tim e for the entire study was about 7 weeks.

IV . T U R B U L E N T F L O W

T he e ectiveness of the steady spatialforcing (2) in reducing the frictionaldrag is as- sessed by exam ining the value of the skin-friction coe cient obtained in several di erent sim ulations,in w hich the am plitude A and the wavelength _x ofthe wallforcing are system - atically varied. T he m easured coe cients are then com pared to the value ofthe reference (unforced) ow . T he savings in driving power w illthen be com pared to the energetic cost ofthe wallvelocity distribution,in orderto assesthe netpowersaving m ade possible by the spatialforcing.

A . P um ping pow er saved

O ur sim ulations are perform ed at a xed ow rate,so that a decrease ofthe frictional drag translatesinto a proportionaldecrease ofthe m ean stream w ise pressure gradientand of the power required to drive the ow . T he power to drive the ow against viscous resistance is de ned as:

P_dr= U_bL_xL_z t_f t_i

Z tf

ti

(_x;‘+ _x;u)dt;

w here _x;‘and _x;u are the space-averaged value of the stream w ise com ponent of the wall shear stress, evaluated at the lower and upper wallrespectively, and (t_f t_i) is the tim e intervalover w hich the tim e averaged is carried out,after discarding initialtransients.

T he percentage saved power P_sav is expressed as percentage ofthe power P_dr;0required to drive the ow in the reference case,and is de ned as follow s:

P_sav= 100P_dr;0 P_dr Pdr;0

:

T he quantity P_sav exactly corresponds to the percentage offriction drag reduction,and is expected to be a function ofA and _x.

In g.4 P_sav is plotted rst as a function of ⁺_x, for di erent values of the am plitude A⁺. A vailable data [8]obtained w ith tem poralforcing are also plotted,w ith the oscillation period translated into an oscillation wavelength through thenear-wallvalueoftheconvection velocity,nam ely U_w⁺ = 10.

T he capitalinform ation draw n from this plot is the validation ofour working hypothe- sis: the present steady forcing indeed parallels the unsteady oscillating-walltechnique w hen oscillation period and forcing wavelength are related through U_w. In analogy to the oscil- lating wall, that yields the m axim um D R at a well-de ned oscillation period T⁺,nam ely T_opt⁺ = 100 125,the steady forcing yields the m axim um D R at a well-de ned wavelength

+

x, nam ely ⁺_x;opt = 1000 1250. It is striking how well the prediction ⁺_x;opt = U_w⁺T_opt⁺ is con rm ed by our sim ulations. D R is observed over a very w ide range of wavelenghts, 200 < ⁺_x < 8000,analogously to the oscillating wall.

T he e ects ofthe SSL on the turbulent ow are,however,only qualitatively sim ilar to those ofthe T SL.Q uantitative di erences do exist,and in particular at a given wavelength the spatialforcing isobserved to attain largervaluesofD R w hen com pared to the tem poral forcing at the sam e am plitude and equivalent period. Fig.5 show s P_sav as a function ofthe

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

P s a v

λ ⁺ _x

TSL, A ⁺ = 12

A ⁺ = 12

A ⁺ = 6

A ⁺ = 2

A ⁺ = 1

FIG .4: Percentage drag reduction P_sav as a function ofthe forcing w avelength. Em pty sym bols are tem poralcases from Q uadrio & R icco [8]: for them ⁺_x = U_w⁺T⁺ (see text).

am plitude A⁺,fordi erentvaluesof ⁺_x. T he plotcontainsdata from spatialaswellasfrom tem poral forcing cases. T he dependence of D R on the forcing am plitude is qualitatively very sim ilar for T SL and SSL:D R m onotonically grow s w ith A ,but the increase saturates to an apparently asym ptotic behavior. A gain,the space-dependent forcing appears to be m ore e ective in reducing turbulentfriction: fora given am plitude the spatialforcing yields a 20 30% largerD R than the tem poralforcing. A m axim um D R ofabout52% isobserved at ⁺_x = 1250 w ith a forcing am plitude ofA⁺ = 20.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25

P s a v

A ⁺

λ ⁺ = 312

λ ⁺ = 1250

λ ⁺ = 3000

TSL, T ⁺ = 30

TSL, T ⁺ = 125

FIG . 5: Percentage drag reduction P_sav as a function of forcing am plitude. A s in g.4, em pty sym bols are tem poralcases from Q uadrio & R icco [8]: for com parison recall that T⁺ = ⁺_x=U_w⁺ (see text).

B . P ow er expended at the w all

In addition to P_dr,the forced channel ow has an additionalpower input P_req,that is required to enforce the wallm otion against the spanw ise shear stress. P_req is de ned as:

P_req= L_z t_f t_i

Z tf

ti

Z Lx

0

W (_z;‘+ _z;u)dxdt; (9)

w here _z isthe space-averaged value ofthe spanw ise com ponentofthe wallshearstress,and W is the spanw ise velocity ofthe walls.

T he required percentage power P_req is de ned in term s ofthe friction power P_dr;0 ofthe reference ow as P_req = P_req=P_dr;0. P_req is presented in g.6 as a function of the forcing wavelength. A gain,spatialas wellas tem poralforcing data are included. O f course P_req

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

P r e q

λ ⁺ _x

A ⁺ = 6

A ⁺ = 12

TSL, A ⁺ = 12

FIG .6: Percentage required pow er P_reqas a function ofthe forcing w avelength. A s in g.4,em pty sym bols are tem poralcases from Q uadrio & R icco [8]. T he line-connected asterisks represent P_req obtained from the lam inar solution w ith A⁺ = 12,from form ula (5) for the T SL and from form ula (7) for the SSL.

assum es negative values,i.e. work hasto be done againstthe uid viscosity. C om paring the two forcing m ethods,one can easily appreciate how the spatialforcing presents an energetic cost that is sm aller than the cost oftem poralforcing,by approxim ately a factor of2.

T he line-connected points in g.6 represent the values P_req that can be com puted from lam inar theory. T SL and SSL are considered at A⁺ = 12,for w hich form ulas (5) and (7) respectively are analytically integrated. T he good agreem ent was expected, since it was already observed (see g.3) that lam inar and turbulent m ean pro les ofspanw ise velocity are coincident.

Lastly,a net percentage power saving P_netis easily de ned by com paring P_req and P_sav,

-60

-40

-20

0

20

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

P n e t

λ ⁺ _x

-60

-40

-20

0

20

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

P n e t

λ ⁺ _x

A ⁺ = 6

A ⁺ = 12

TSL, A ⁺ = 12

FIG .7: Percentage net pow er saving P_netas a function ofthe forcing w avelength.

as follow s:

P_net= P_sav+ P_req:

T he netpowersaving P_netisplotted in g.7. Since ithasalready been observed how SSL yields higherD R atlower energetic cost,ofcourse here a signi cant di erence in netgain is expected w hen com paring SSL and T SL.P_netshow sindeed an interesting m axim um value of about23% atA⁺ = 6,w hile rem aining positive overa w ide range ofwavelengths. M oreover, positive P_netare found for rather large am plitudes: at A⁺ = 12 a net gain ofabout 5% can stillbe observed,w hereas the T SL at the sam e am plitude presents a net loss ofabout30% . Itisworth noting thatthe search forthe m axim um ofP_netcannotbe considered exhaustive, and thus the presently observed m axim um value of23% at A⁺ = 6 should be regarded as a starting point for a re ned search.

FIG .8: Isosurfaces for the quantity ⁺₂ = 0:03. Flow is from left to right. Top: reference ow ; bottom : spatialforcing w ith ⁺_x = 1250 and A⁺ = 12.

C . F low statistics

O bserving them ain statisticsofthe ow and even a few instantaneoussnapshotsm ay help understanding how SSL a ects turbulence. (A dditionalstatisticalquantities are presented elsew here [24]). In g.8 isosurfaces are visualized for the 2 quantity introduced by Jeong

& H ussain [25]and since then often used to identify turbulent vorticalstructures. T he level is set at ⁺₂ = 0:03. T he top plot is for the reference ow ,and the bottom plot is for the sam e ow subject to the e ects ofthe spatialforcing,w ith ⁺ = 1250 and A⁺ = 12. T his is one ofthe cases w ith the highest drag reduction,i.e. 45% . T he SSL clearly appears to

0

5

10

15

20

25

1 10 100

hu i + x z t

y ⁺

0

5

10

15

20

25

1 10 100

hu i + x z t

y ⁺

ref

SSL

TSL

ref

SSL

TSL

FIG .9: Stream w ise m ean velocity pro le in law -of-the-w allform . D otted line is the linear velocity pro le hui⁺_xzt= y⁺.

m odify the near-wallturbulence and its structures.

Sim ilar considerations can be draw n from single realizations ofthe ow as wellfrom its statisticaldescription. Fig.9 reports the m ean velocity pro le in the law -of-the-wallform . T he m odi cation to the pro le for the T SL and SSL cases are analogous w hen com pared to the reference ow ,but the e ects are larger for the SSL.T he drag reduction m anifests itselfthrough the thickening ofthe viscous sublayer,that results in the upward shift ofthe logarithm icportion ofthevelocity pro le,aspreviously docum ented forotherD R techniques, for exam ple riblets [26].

A nother relevant statistical quantity that is m odi ed by the action of the SSL is the turbulence intensity. Fig.10 presents the r.m .s. value ofthe uctuations ofthe stream w ise velocity com ponent. To exam ine the e ect of the lower R eynolds num ber im plied by the

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1 10 100

u + r m s

y ⁺

ref

SSL

SSL, rescaled

FIG .10: R oot-m ean-square value ofthe uctuations for the stream w ise velocity com ponent.

strong drag reduction in a constant- ow -rate sim ulation,this plot is stillscaled using inner variables,butboth the friction velocity ofthe reference ow and the actualfriction velocity of the drag-m odi ed ow are used as velocity scale. T he strong reduction of uctuations is deem phasized w ith the latter form ofscaling,and w hat rem ains is the structurale ect of the SSL after subtracting the e ect due to a sm aller R e . T he curves however rem ain signi cantly di erent;the m ain e ectisa decrease ofthe uctuation intensity,togetherw ith a displacem entoftheposition ofthem axim um intensity furtherform thewall.Sim ilare ects have been already docum ented for other D R m ethods. In particular the sam e observation has been putforward [8]forthe oscillating-wall. It m ay be usefulto rem ind the reader that e ective D R m ethods exist, for exam ple the active opposition control [27], w here u⁺_{rm s} is una ected w hen properly scaled; on the other hand,as discussed for exam ple by Jim enez [28], experim ental evidence exists that wall roughness m ay reduce the near-wall peak of

turbulence intensities w hile increasing drag.

V . D ISC U SSIO N A N D C O N C L U SIO N S

T hispaperhasstudied a new form ofboundary forcing forwall-bounded turbulent ow s, that consists in im posing at the walla steady distribution ofspanw ise velocity,m odulated in the stream w ise direction. In this study only sinusoidalm odulation has been considered.

M ain m otivation wasto nd a steady counterpartto the oscillating-walltechnique. T he link between the two kinds offorcing is the convection velocity ofthe turbulence uctuations, that takes a well-de ned non-zero value U_w at the walland is thus capable oftransform ing a tim e scale into a length scale and viceversa.

T hanks to a num ber ofdirect num ericalsim ulations,the behavior ofthis new forcing in the param eterspace hasbeen determ ined,and D R up to 52% hasbeen observed forA⁺ = 20 and ⁺_x = 1250.Forallam plitudes,the forcing wavelength thatyieldsthe m axim um D R has been found to correspond to the optim alperiod ofthe oscillating wallconverted in length through U_w,thuscon rm ing thevalidity oftheanalogy between tem poraland spatialforcing.

T hisanalogy hasbeen extended furtherby studying the lam inarcase: thiswasknow n to be relevant to the oscillating-walltechnique,since in the turbulent case the spanw ise pro le after space-tim e averaging is identicalto the lam inar solution. T he lam inar solution,that can be w ritten in term s of A iry functions, has been determ ined for the spatial case too, and it has been additionally veri ed that the turbulent spanw ise ow w hen phase-averaged is identicalto the lam inar solution. T his property can be leveraged to predict the power required for the control. W e hope that a predictive quantity, sim ilar to the param eter discussed by Q uadrio & R icco [8,21]and capable ofdescribing the D R e ectsofthe forcing, could be envisaged on the basis ofthis analyticalsolution.

Together w ith qualitative analogies,there are quantitative di erences between tem poral and spatialforcing. T he spatialforcing is m ore e cient in term s ofD R ,from the point of view ofboth absolute D R and net power saving. In particular,a net power saving as high as 23% has been com puted at A⁺ = 6, w ith one unit of forcing power translating into 3 units ofsaved power. T his is m ore than 3 tim es the largest net saving docum ented for the oscillating wall,and also signi cantly larger than the bene t obtained w ith passive devices like riblets, that are reportedly capable of a saving up to 8-10% in laboratory conditions

[29].

T he present form of spatial forcing is certainly realizable in principle, and an experi- m entalsetup is indeed under construction that w illhelp shedding light on e ects like the dependence ofD R on R e. A tthe sam e tim e,we do notconsider the present forcing,though steady,directly suitable as yet for practicalapplications. H owever,the successfuldesign of a steady controllaw isone im portantstep towardsthe realization ofa passive drag-reducing device. In this fram ework,the sensitivity ofthe turbulence near-wallcycle to a well-de ned stream w ise lengthscale is a fundam entalresult,that paves the way to the search for an e - cientdrag-reducing type ofroughness. In thiscontext,we have recently applied fora patent [30]concerning a design m ethod ofroughness distributions yielding im proved bene ts over conventional riblets. Such distributions m ay contain riblets w ith sinusoidally ondulated crests w ith wavelength _opt. A later paper by Peet et al. [31]has con rm ed by num erical sim ulations the potentialsuccess ofsim ilar sinusoidalriblets,reporting a 50% im provem ent over conventionalriblets. Since in [31]the wavelength was in the optim um range,but only a single am plitude was tested,we are con dent thateven largerbene ts can be attained by such a purely passive technique.

V I. A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S

C V has been supported by Italian M inistry of U niversity and R esearch through the grant PR IN 2005 on Large scale structures in wallturbulence. W e acknow ledge interesting discussions w ith D r P.R icco. Part ofthis work has been presented by C V in June 2007 at the X IEuropean Turbulence C onference,Porto (P).

V II. A P P E N D IX

In this A ppendix an analytical,approxim ate solution ofthe N avier{Stokes equations for the lam inar ow between inde nite plane walls is described, w here the non-hom ogeneous boundary condition

w(x;0;z;t)= A cos( x) (10)

is im posed to the spanw ise velocity com ponent. T he boundary forcing creates a layer of alternate spanw ise m otion, w hich develops close to the wall and resem bles the tem poral

Stokes layer. W e have referred to it in this paper as the Spatial Stokes Layer (SSL), in com parison to the conventionalTem poralStokes Layer (T SL).A n analyticalsolution w ill bederived now forthe velocity pro le oftheSSL,undertheassum ption thatthewall-norm al length scale characteristic ofthe layer is sm allin com parison to the channelw idth.

T he solution is steady,and thanks to the spanw ise invariance ofthe di erentialsystem , including itsboundary conditions,allthe z derivatives can be dropped from the m om entum equations,w hich then read:

u@u

@x+ v@u

@y = 1 @p

@x+ @²u

@x² + @²u

@y² ; (11a)

u@v

@x+ v@v

@y= 1 @p

@y+ @²v

@x² + @²v

@y² ; (11b)

u@w

@x + v@w

@y = @²w

@x² + @²w

@y² : (11c)

T hishighlightsthatEqs.(11a)and (11b)decouple from Eq.(11c)to form an independent two-dim ensional problem , una ected by the inhom ogeneous boundary condition (10). Its solution is thus the classicallam inar Poiseuille solution,that gives a parabolic longitudinal velocity pro le,and predicts a wall-norm alvelocity v 0 everyw here. T hus Eq.(11c) can be further sim pli ed as:

u@w

@x = @²w

@x² + @²w

@y²; (12)

In (12) u = u(y)is the (know n) parabolic Poiseuille pro le. T he PD E (12) is linear,and thus in the follow ing we w illconsider A = 1 w ithout loss ofgenerality.

A t this point a boundary-layer approxim ation is introduced. W e suppose the SSL to be con ned in a thin region close to the wall, and to vanish at a distance de nitely sm aller than h. If _x indicates the characteristic thickness ofthe SSL,we are requiring that _x h.

Even before giving a precise de nition of _x,we have seen in g.2 that this requirem ent is satis ed w hen the ow param eters are set w ithin the range ofinterest (w hich is w here the spatialforcing achieves a substantialD R in the turbulent regim e).

Forsm all _x=h,u(y)in Eq.(12)can bereplaced w ith the rstterm in itsTaylorexpansion:

u(y) u_y;0y:

If _x is com parable orlargerthan h,the boundary-layer approxim ation im plies also that

@²w =@x² in Eq.(12)isnegligible com pared to @²w =@y². W e are thusleftw ith the well-posed

problem :

u_y;0y@w

@x = @²w

@y²; (13)

w ith boundary conditions:

w(x;0) = cos( x) (14)

lim

y! 1 w(x;y) = 0 to be solved in the dom ain y 2 (0;+ 1 ).

Its generalsolution w (x;y) has the form :

w(x;y)= < e^{i x}F(y) ; (15)

w here the function F is com plex valued,F (y):R ! C .

B y substituting the functionalform (15) into Eq.(13) an ordinary di erentialequation for the unknow n function F is obtained:

i ¹ u_y;0yF(y)= d²F(y)

dy² : (16)

Its boundary conditions follow directly from (14):

<[F (0)]= 1; = [F (0)]= 0; lim

y! 1 F(y)= 0: (17)

To sim plify notation,the factors ¹ u_y;0 in the l.h.s. ofEq.(16) are w ritten in term s of a single param eter _x,w hich has dim ensions ofa length:

1 u_y;0= _x³; (18)

Eq.(16) then becom es:

i_x³yF = d²F

dy²: (19)

Introducing the change of variable y = i_xy, and rede ning the unknow n function as~ F(i_xy~)= ~F(~y) turns Eq.(19) into the follow ing A iry equation:

~

y ~F(~y)= d²F~

d~y²: (20)

In nite solutionsofan A iry equation existfor ~yspanning the w hole com plex plane,w hen derivatives are considered in the sense of analytic functions. T hese solutions are linear com binations ofthe two specialfunctions A i(~y) and B i(~y)

F~(~y)= A i(~y)+ B i(~y); (21)

w hich arecalled A iry functionsofthe rstand second kind respectively. T hegeneralsolution (21) has an alternate representation [20],w hich turns out to be usefulin our case:

F~(~y)= A i(! ~y)+ A i(!²y~); (22)

w here ! = e ⁱ²⁼³ . It can be show n [20]that am ong A i(~y),B i(~y),A i(! ~y) and A i(!²y),the~ only base function satisfying conditions (17) (up to a norm alization factor) is A i(!²y). A s~ a consequence,the solution that satis es the required boundary conditions is:

F~(~y)= A i(!²y~)

A i(0) : (23)

B y substituting this solution into (15),the expression for the unknow n function w (x;y) is eventually derived:

w(x;y)= C_x< e^{i x}A i iy

x

e ^{i4 =3} (24)

w here C_x = A i(0) ¹.

[1] M .G ad-elH ak. Flow C ontrol{ Passive,A ctive and R eactive Flow M anagem ent. C am bridge U niversity Press,C am bridge,2000.

[2] P.B radshaw and N .S.Pontikos.M easurem entsin the turbulentboundary layeron an ‘in nite’

sw ept w ing. J.Fluid M ech.,159:105{130,1985.

[3] G .E. K arniadakis and K .-S. C hoi. M echanism s on T ransverse M otions in T urbulent W all Flow s. A nn.Rev.Fluid M ech.,35:45{62,2003.

[4] W .J. Jung, N . M angiavacchi, and R . A khavan. Suppression of turbulence in w all-bounded ow s by high-frequency spanw ise oscillations. Phys.Fluids A ,4 (8):1605{1607,1992.

[5] M .Q uadrio and S.Sibilla.N um ericalsim ulation ofturbulent ow in a pipe oscillating around its axis. J.Fluid M ech.,424:217{241,2000.

[6] J-I. C hoi, C .-X . X u, and H . J. Sung. D rag reduction by spanw ise w all oscillation in w all- bounded turbulent ow s. A IA A J.,40(5):842{850,2002.

[7] M .Q uadrio and P.A .R icco.Initialresponse ofa turbulentchannel ow to spanw ise oscillation ofthe w alls. J.Turbulence,4(7),2003.

[8] M .Q uadrio and P.R icco. C riticalassessm ent ofturbulent drag reduction through spanw ise w alloscillation. J.Fluid M ech.,521:251{271,2004.

[9] F.Laadhari,L.Skandaji,and R .M orel. Turbulence reduction in a boundary layer by a local spanw ise oscillating surface. Phys.Fluids,6 (10):3218{3220,1994.

[10] K -S.C hoiand M .G raham .D rag reduction ofturbulentpipe ow sby circular-w alloscillation.

P hys.Fluids,10(1):7{9,1998.

[11] K .-S.C hoi. N ear-w all structure of turbulent boundary layer w ith spanw ise-w all oscillation.

P hys.Fluids,14(7):2530{2542,2002.

[12] A .B aron and M .Q uadrio.Turbulentdrag reduction by spanw ise w alloscillations. A ppl.Sci.

Res.,55:311{326,1996.

[13] H .Schlichting and K .G ersten. B oundary-Layer T heory. Springer,B erlin,2000.

[14] J.K im and F.H ussain.Propagation velocity ofperturbationsin turbulentchannel ow .Phys.

Fluids A ,5(3):695{706,1993.

[15] T .W . B erger, J.K im , C .Lee, and J.Lim . Turbulent boundary layer control utilizing the Lorentz force. Phys.Fluids,12(3):631{649,2000.

[16] H .Zhao,J.-Z.W u,and J.-S.Luo.Turbulentdrag reduction by traveling w ave of exible w all.

Fluid D yn.Res.,34:175{198,2004.

[17] W .Schoppa and F.H ussain. A large-scale control strategy for drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers. Phys.Fluids,10(5):1049{1051,1998.

[18] W .Schoppa and F.H ussain. C oherent structure generation in near-w allturbulence. J.Fluid M ech.,453:57{108,2002.

[19] J.Jeong,F.H ussain,W .Schoppa,and J.K im .C oherentstructuresnearthew allin a turbulent channel ow . J.Fluid M ech.,332:185{214,1997.

[20] C .M .B ender and S.A .O rszag. A dvanced m athem aticalm ethods for scientists and engineers.

Springer,B erlin,1999.

[21] P.R icco and M .Q uadrio. W all-oscillation conditions for drag reduction in turbulent channel ow . Int.J.H eat Fluid Flow,29:601{612,2008.

[22] P.Luchiniand M .Q uadrio.A low -costparallelim plem entation ofdirectnum ericalsim ulation ofw allturbulence. J.C om p.Phys.,211(2):551{571,2006.

[23] S.B .Pope. TurbulentFlows. C am bridge U niversity Press,C am bridge,2000.

[24] M . Q uadrio, C . V iotti, and P. Luchini. Skin-friction drag reduction via steady stream w ise oscillations ofspanw ise velocity. In J.M .L.M .Palm a and Silva Lopes A .,editors,A dvances in T urbulence X I,A dvances in Turbulence X I,pages 659{661.Springer,B erlin,2007.

[25] J.Jeong and F.H ussain. O n the identi cation ofa vortex. J.Fluid M ech.,285:69{94,1995.

[26] K .-S.C hoi. N ear-w allstructure ofa turbulent boundary layer w ith riblets. Journalof Fluid M echanics,208:417{458,1989.

[27] H .C hoi,P.M oin,and J.K im . A ctive turbulence controlfor drag reduction in w all-bounded ow s. J.Fluid M ech.,262:75{110,1994.

[28] J.Jim enez. Turbulent Flow s over R ough W alls. A nn.Rev.Fluid M ech.,36:173{196,2004.

[29] D .W .B echert,M .B ruse,W .H age,J.G .T .van der H oeven,and G .H oppe. Experim ents on drag-reducing surfaces and their optim ization w ith an adjustable geom etry. J. Fluid M ech., 338:59{87,1997.

[30] M .Q uadrio and P.Luchini. M ethod for reducing the friction betw een a uid and an object.

W O 2009/000703 A 1.

[31] Y .Peet,Y .Sagaut,and P.C harron.TurbulentD rag R eduction using SinusoidalR iblets w ith T riangular C ross-Section. A IA A Paper 2008-3745,June 2008.