Orange County Public Schools Pedestrian Road Safety and Walkability Audit

(1)

1

Orange County Public Schools Pedestrian Road Safety

and Walkability Audit

Prepared by:

Christopher V. Hawkins, Ph.D.

School of Public Administration

Center for Public and Nonprofit Management

University of Central Florida

Nicolas Thalmueller

Research Assistant

Center for Public and Nonprofit Management

University of Central Florida

(2)

2

Executive Summary

Between June 1, 2014 and August 25, 2014 the Master of Science in Urban and Regional

Planning program and the Center for Public and Nonprofit Management at the University of

Central Florida, in partnership with Orange County Public Schools (OCPS) conducted an audit

of the pedestrian infrastructure within a 2 mile radius around four elementary schools in Orange

County, Florida.

Within the Waterford Elementary study area there were 51 issues identified as affecting

pedestrian facilities. The majority of these issues relate to the presence of faded, missing or

damaged paint on crosswalks. Within the Lake Silver study area 79 issues affecting pedestrian

facilities were identified. The majority of these issues dealt with the presence of temporary or

permanent obstructions blocking pedestrian paths. Slightly fewer issues – 75 - were found within

the Spring Lake study area. The majority of these issues relate to the adequacy and maintenance

of the walking surface. Within the Shingle Creek study area there were 31 issues identified.

These issues are primarily related to the presence of faded, missing or damaged paint on

crosswalks.

No issues were found that exceed the minimum requirements to be deemed hazardous, as

prescribed by FS § 1006.23 (4) (a) (1) which states “It shall be considered a hazardous walking

condition with respect to any road along which students must walk in order to walk to and from

school if there is not an area at least 4 feet wide adjacent to the road, having a surface upon

which students may walk without being required to walk on the road surface. In addition,

whenever the road along which students must walk is uncurbed and has a posted speed limit of

55 miles per hour, the area as described above for students to walk upon shall be set off the road

by no less than 3 feet from the edge of the road.”

(3)

3

Introduction

Walking is an important and healthy means of transportation. Yet, the interactions between

pedestrians and automobiles, and inadequate or poorly maintained infrastructure, often put

pedestrians at risk. Issues which contribute to an unsafe walking environment include:

unprotected street crossings, lengthy crossings, crossings that are spaced too far apart,

interchanges, partial or nonexistent walking paths, poor quality walking surfaces, nonexistent or

inappropriate crossing treatments, lack of separation from vehicular traffic, high speed traffic,

the perception that walking is a risk to personal safety, and more

1

. Appropriate walking areas are

essential to improving pedestrian safety

2

. In 2012, 4,743 pedestrians were killed in traffic crashes

in 2012, an increase of six percent from the previous year. Approximately 76,000 pedestrians

were also injured in traffic crashes. Six percent of those pedestrian fatalities and eighteen percent

of injuries were children ages fifteen and younger

3

_.

_{In Orange County, Florida, traffic crashes}

resulted in 460 pedestrian injuries and 37 pedestrian fatalities in 2012

4

_.

The existing neighborhood conditions that surround schools pose a unique set of challenges

to school age children. Young children have lower mobility levels, reduced visibility due to their

lower height, and reduced motor skills that limit their ability to walk at certain speeds, turn their

heads in certain ways, and see all signs, signals, and markings

1

.

In order to improve the safety of the pedestrian environment for elementary school age

children, the MSURP program and the Center for Public and Nonprofit Management at the

University Of Central Florida, in partnership with Orange County Public Schools, conducted an

evaluation of the existing built environment within a two-mile radius of four elementary schools

in Orange County, FL (Waterford Elementary, Lake Silver Elementary, Shingle Creek

Elementary, and Spring Lake Elementary). A report was generated for each school which

identifies locations where there are pedestrian safety concerns and provides recommendations for

improvement.

1_{U.S Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (2007).}_{Pedestrian road safety audit guidelines and prompt lists}_(Report

no. FHWA-SA-07-007). Retrieved from website: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/resources/fhwasa09027/resources/Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Guidelines.pdf

2_{Florida Department of Transportation, Research Center. (2013).}_{Comprehensive study to reduce pedestrian crashes in Florida}_{. Retrieved from}

website: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/research-center/Completed_Proj/Summary_SF/FDOT-BDK80-977-32-rpt.pdf

3_{National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2014).}_{Traffic safety facts, 2012 data, pedestrians}_.

http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811888.pdf

4_{Metroplan Orlando, (2013).}_{Tracking the trends: A report on transportation system indicators for the Orlando metropolitan area.}

(7)

7

Overview of Road Safety Audits

In order to ensure the safe operation of roadways and pedestrian infrastructure, and improve

safety for all road users, local, state, and federal transportation agencies have engaged in Road

Safety Audits (RSA). The Federal Highway Administration defines a Road Safety Audit (RSA)

as a process to identify safety issues and make suggestions on measures and facilities to improve

pedestrian safety. RSAs are typically conducted to address the safe operation of roadways and

crossings to ensure a high level of safety for all road users. The main objective of the four RSAs

in this report is to identify pedestrian safety issues and make recommended improvements to

existing pedestrian infrastructure. While some RSAs are conducted prior to the start of

consruction, the RSA conducted for the purposes of this report are

post-construction

assessments

of existing pedestrian infrastructure within a two mile walk radius around four elementary

schools. A post construction RSA is a formal safety examination of an existing roadway and

pedestrian network conducted in order to identify the roadside features, design elements, and

local conditions, and how these elements intersect with each other and with all road users

1

_.

Methodology

Guiding Document

The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Pedestrian

Road Safety Audit Field Manual and Master Prompt List was used as the overarching guide for

conducting each RSA. The master prompt list consists of two basic elements: the universal

considerations and the matrix of pedestrian prompts. The universal considerations include: the

needs of pedestrians, connectivity and convenience of pedestrian facilities, traffic, behavior,

construction, and school presence. The RSA matrix of pedestrian prompts consists of 3 major

topic areas (pedestrian facilities, traffic, and traffic control devises), 9 subtopic categories

(presence, design and placement; quality, condition, and obstructions; continuity and

connectivity; lighting; visibility; access management; traffic, signs and pavement markings; and

signals) and 4 RSA zones (streets, street crossings, parking areas/adjacent developments; transit

areas). The RSA team reviewed the existing pedestrian infrastructure based on the prompts in all

9 subtopic categories. Descriptions of the detailed prompts used in this report are located in

Appendix 1.

(8)

8

(9)

9

Table 2: FHWA RSA Subtopic Descriptions

Subtopic Description

Presence, Design, and Placement

Looks at the presence, design, and placement of pedestrian infrastructure including sidewalks, shoulders, ramps, and buffers throughout the study area. Quality, Conditions,

and Obstructions

Assesses the presence of surface obstructions, hazards, and maintenance issues along pedestrian pathways throughout the study area.

Continuity and Connectivity

Concerns barriers and discontinuities that disrupt the pedestrian infrastructure throughout the study area.

Lighting Concerns the presence of street lighting throughout the study area.

Visibility Regards the visibility of pedestrians walking along pathways throughout the study area.

Access Management Concerns the presence, number, or spacing of driveways throughout the study area affects pedestrian movement.

Traffic Assays conflicts between pedestrians and other modes of transportation throughout the study area.

Signs and Pavement Markings

Assesses the conditions of marked crosswalks and pedestrian signage which warns drivers that pedestrians may be crossing the street.

Signals Identifies the presence and effectiveness of pedestrian signal heads which assist pedestrians in crossing intersections safely.

(10)

10

Definitions

This report assessed each safety and walkability issues associated with the existing

pedestrian infrastructure along street segments and street crossings within each study area. The

street segment assessment identified issues on sidewalks, trails, or other paths that may be used

by pedestrians. The street crossings assessment identified issues on the pedestrian infrastructure

where one roadway crosses another

1

. Pedestrian infrastructure includes: sidewalks, curb ramps,

marked crosswalks, roadway lighting improvements, buffers, and curb ramps (Comprehensive

Study to Reduce Pedestrian Crashes in Florida). Parking areas and Transit areas were excluded

from this RSA because the main focus of this study is to assess the pedestrian facilities that are

utilized by children walking to school within the two mile walk zone study area.

Identified issues within each study area were categorized into one of the nine subtopic

categories and then associated with one of the detailed prompts. Issues within the nine subtopic

categories were assessed as to whether they represented a

primary

or

secondary

problem. For

the purposes of this study, primary issues are defined as those which present a serious threat to

pedestrians and require immediate action to remove the issue. If two minor issues are present at

one given location this is then categorized as a primary issue due to the compound threat they

represent. Secondary issues are defined as those which represent a more minor threat to

pedestrians and pedestrian travel. Secondary issues have the potential to develop into or combine

with other secondary issues to create a primary issue.

(11)

11

Roadway Functional Classifications

This report also provides information about the functional classifications of roadways within

each study area. Roadway functional classification is “is the process by which streets and

highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of traffic service that

they are intended to provide”.

5



Principal Urban Arterial roadways serve as major activity centers, are the corridors with

the highest traffic volume and the longest trip demands. They serve demand for intra-area

travel between the central business district and outlying residential areas.



Minor Urban Arterial roadways interconnect the higher-level Arterials and serve trips of

moderate length, serve geographic areas that are smaller than their higher Arterial

counterparts and offer connectivity to the higher Arterial system.



Major Urban Collector roadways serve both land access and traffic circulation in higher

density residential, and commercial/industrial areas. These roadways run through

residential neighborhoods, often for significant distances, and distribute and channel trips

between.



Minor Urban Collector roadways serve both land access and traffic circulation in lower

density residential and commercial/industrial areas. These roadways also run through

residential neighborhoods, but often only for a short distance, and distribute and channel

trips between Local Roads and Arterials, usually over a distance of less than

three-quarters of a mile



Local Urban Roads provide direct access to adjacent land and higher systems. These

roadways carry no through traffic movement. They are not intended for use in long

distance travel, except at the origin or destination end of the trip, due to their provision of

direct access to abutting land.

5_{Source: U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty. (2013). Highway}

functional classification concepts, criteria and procedures. Retrieved from website:

(12)

12

Data Used

GIS maps provided by Orange County Public Schools were used to identify each study

area. Each study area is represented as a 2 mile walk radius around each elementary school.

Additional GIS data representing roadways, roadway functional classifications, intersections, and

local jurisdictions were gathered from the Orange County data download (FTP) website

6

.

The field data for this report was gathered by the RSA team who walked each roadway

segment and crossing within each study area. Existing roads and pedestrian networks within the

two-mile radius that are considered priority areas for evaluation were based on the residence of

school age population and areas known to have safety issues based on incidences reported to

Orange County Public Schools. Data was gathered between the times of 7 A.M and 11 A.M on

weekdays in order to represent conditions at peak travel times for both children walking to

school and automobiles.

6_{Orange County Government. (2014).}_{Ftp directory /divisions/infomap/pub/gis downloads}_.

(13)

13

Study Areas

Table 3: RSA Dates

School Address RSA Dates

Waterford Elementary 12950 Lake Underhill Rd. Orlando, FL

32828

June, 16 2014 to June, 23 2014

Lake Silver Elementary 2401 North Rio Grande Avenue, Orlando,

32804-4827

June, 30 2014 to July, 7 2014

Shingle Creek Elementary 5620 Harcourt Avenue, Orlando, FL 32839

July, 14 2014 to July, 21 2014

Spring Lake Elementary 1105 Sarah Lee Lane, Ocoee, 34761-3236 July, 28 2014 to August 4,

2014

The Waterford Elementary study area is entirely located within the jurisdiction of

unincorporated Orange County, Florida. The Lake Silver Elementary Study area is located

primarily within the jurisdiction of the city of Orlando with several sections within

unincorporated Orange County. The Shingle Creek Elementary study area is located partially

within the jurisdiction of the city of Orlando and partially in unincorporated Orange County. The

Spring Lake Elementary study area is located primarily within the jurisdiction of the city of

Ocoee with several sections in unincorporated Orange County.

(14)

14

Major Findings

Waterford Elementary



There were 51 identified issues within the Waterford elementary study area, of which 26

were Primary issues and the remaining 25 were secondary issues.



The majority (6) of the street segment issues fit into the Quality, Conditions, and

Obstructions category, most of which were issues associated with adequacy and maintenance

of the walking surface.



The majority (25) of the street crossing issues were fit into the Signs and Pavement Markings

category, most of which were issues of faded, missing, or damaged paint on stop and

crosswalks. Faded or damaged crossing signal signs were also included in this subcategory.



The majority of both primary (14) and secondary (11) issues were street crossings issues of

faded, missing, or damaged paint on stop and crosswalks.

Lake Silver Elementary



There were 79 identified issues within the Lake Silver elementary study area, of which 60

were primary issues, and 19 secondary issues.



The majority (21) of the street segment issues fit into the Quality, Conditions, and

Obstructions category, most of which were issues with temporary or permanent obstructions

blocking pedestrian paths.



The majority (17) of the street crossing issues fit into the Continuity and Connectivity

category, most of which were issues associated with whether the pedestrian network

connectivity continued through crossings by means of adequate, waiting areas at corners curb

ramps and marked crosswalks.



The majority (16) primary issues were street crossings issues dealing with whether the

pedestrian network connectivity continues through crossings by means of adequate waiting

areas at corners, curb ramps, and marked crosswalks.



The majority (14) secondary issues were street sections issues dealing with whether the

pedestrian path was clear form both temporary and permanent obstructions.

(15)

15

Shingle Creek Elementary



There were 31 identified issues within the Shingle Creek elementary study area, of which 21

were primary issues and 10 were secondary issues.



The majority (8) of the street segment issues fit into the Quality, Conditions, and

Obstructions category, most of which were issues associated with the presence of temporary

or permanent obstructions obstructing the pedestrian pathway.



The majority (10) of the street crossings issues fit into the Signs and Pavement Markings

category, most of which were issues of faded, missing, or damaged paint on stop and

crosswalks. Faded or damaged crossing signal signs were also included in this subcategory.



The majority (8) of primary issues were street crossing issues dealing with faded, missing, or

damaged paint on stop and crosswalks.



The majority (3) of secondary issues were street segment issues dealing with whether the

path was clear from temporary or permanent obstructions.

Spring Lake Elementary



There were 75 identified issues within the Spring Lake elementary study area, of which 48

were primary issues and 27 secondary issues.



The majority of the (33) street segment issues fit into the Quality, Conditions, and

Obstructions category, most of which were issues associated with the adequacy and

maintenance of the walking surface.



The majority of the (15) street crossing issues fit into the Continuity and Connectivity

category, most of which were issues associated with whether the pedestrian network

connectivity continued through crossings by means of adequate, waiting areas at corners curb

ramps and marked crosswalks.



The majority (20) of primary issues were a mixture of 10 street segments and 10 street

crossings issues dealing with whether the walking surface was adequate and well maintained.



The majority (13) of secondary issues were also a mixture of 7 street segments and 6 street

(16)

16

(17)

17

Waterford Lakes - Street Segments

Presence, Design, and Placement

Primary Issues Issue

# Location Issue Photo

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 1 Colonial Dr. between River Reach Dr. and Woodbury Rd. The only walkway on this portion of Colonial Dr. is a partially paved pathway on the eastbound side, which is heavily obstructed by construction debris. A. 1.1, A.2.4 Install a navigable sidewalk on the eastbound portion of the road. A sidewalk is not necessary on the other side of Colonial since no residences are located in that area.

Quality, Conditions, and Obstructions

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 2 Rockafellow Way off Golfway Blvd. (Villages) A portion of the southbound sidewalk just past Golfway Blvd. drains slowly and collects water. Obstructions like this are particularly hazardous to pedestrians with mobility issues. Sidewalks .with poor drainage create slippery surfaces that can be dangerous

(18)

18

Secondary Issues Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 3 Fairway Pointe Circle off Golfway Blvd. Fairway Pointe neighborhood

A large amount of dirt obstructs a portion of the westbound sidewalk

A.2.2 One time removal of obstruction 4 Golfway Blvd. between Alafaya Trail and Woodbury Rd. Tree overgrowth obstructs the eastbound sidewalk, just before Fairway Pointe.

A.2.2 Regular Maintenance

5 Alafaya Trail between S.R. 408 and Waterford Lakes Parkway. A hedge in front of Friday’s restaurant narrows the northbound sidewalk and obstructs pedestrian travel.

6

Mark Twain Blvd. between Lower River and River Delta

Slight overgrowth narrows the

northbound sidewalk.

7 Woodbury Rd. between Waterford Lakes and Mallory Cir.

Glass and other dangerous debris are present along the fence on the bridge.

(19)

19 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 8 Seascape Ave between Lake Underhill Rd and Crystal River Dr. Bradfort Lakes Neighborhood A portion of the northbound sidewalk, near the neighborhood entrance, is uneven.

A.2.4 Re-level sidewalk

9 Huckleberry Finn Dr. Between Aunt Polly Ct. and Mark Twain Blvd. The northbound sidewalk is uneven at several locations.

A.2.4 Re-level sidewalk

10 Woodbury Rd. between Parkbury Dr. and Woodbury Glen Dr. One segment westbound sidewalk across from Woodbury Pres. Church is

broken. This could pose a hazard to pedestrians, especially those with visual impairments.

A.2.4 Repair or replace the sidewalk panel. 11 Lake Underhill Rd. between Woodbury Rd. and Mark Twain. Blvd A portion of the eastbound sidewalk drains slowly and collects water.

(20)

20 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 12 Woodbury Rd. between Lake Underhill Rd. and Golfway Blvd. A portion of the sidewalk path that goes along the side of Waterford Elementary is broken.

A.2.4 Repair or replace the sidewalk panel. 13 Huckleberry Finn Dr. Between Alafaya Trail and Beckythatcher Ct.

Several portions of the eastbound sidewalk are broken along.

A.2.4 Repair or replace the sidewalk panels.

Continuity and Connectivity

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 14 Woodbury Rd. between Parkbury Dr. and Waterford Lakes Pkwy. A sidewalk is present on only the southbound side of the road. There is no path or walkable shoulder on the east side. There is no crosswalk across Woodbury, to Woodbury Cove neighborhood. This is significant because there is no sidewalk on that side of the street.

A. 1.1, A.3.2

Install crosswalks across Woodbury Rd. or install sidewalk along eastern portion to Lake Underhill Rd.

(21)

21 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 15 Lake Underhill between Woodbury and Waterford Chase Parkway

There are only two crosswalks across this section of Lake Underhill Rd. one at Discovery Middle School, and one at Waterford Chase intersection. There are located very far apart for pedestrians

A.3.2

Install midblock crosswalks along this portion of Lake Underhill Rd. to assist in programs such as Walking Schoolbus. 16 Golfway Blvd. between Woodbury Rd. and Downpatrick Blvd. There is no marked way to cross Golfway Blvd. except at

Woodbury, which is an intersection with constant traffic and no lights. A.3.2 Install midblock crosswalks to channel pedestrians to safe crossing points. Lighting Primary Issues Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 17 Alafaya Trail between Golfway Blvd. and Saw Palmetto Ln.

There is no lighting for this stretch of roadway. This is a long stretch along a roadway with a 55mph speed limit and heavy traffic volume.

A.4.1

Install street lighting to improve pedestrian safety. 18 Alafaya Trail between Golfway Blvd. and River Delta Dr.

There is no lighting for this stretch of roadway. This is a long stretch along a roadway with a 55 mph speed limit and heavy traffic volume

A.4.1

Install street lighting to improve pedestrian safety.

(22)

22

Signs and Pavement Markings

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 19 Woodbury Rd. Between Colonial and Waterford Wood Cir.

The crosswalk across the Crosslands Motel/Gas Station Entrance on the southbound side is faded.

A.8.2

One time maintenance to repaint the

crosswalk.

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 20 Alafaya Trail Between Lake Underhill and 408.

The crosswalk across the complex entrance on the northbound side at Bonefish Grille is faded and missing.

A.8.2

(23)

23

Waterford Lakes - Street Crossings

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 21 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Curry Ford Rd.

Long crossing with no marked mid-street waiting area. This is an intersection of two minor arterial roadways, which both have a 45 mph speed limit and heavy traffic volume. Crossing pedestrians must share the median area with turning vehicles

B.1.5

Extend the raised median to provide island or waiting area for pedestrians. 22 Intersection of Alafaya Trail. And Huckleberry Finn Dr.

This is a long crossing. While there is a median, it does not come up to the crosswalk and provides no protection to

pedestrians from crossing vehicles.

B.1.5

Extend the raised median to provide island or waiting area for pedestrians.

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 23 Intersection of Colonial and River Reach Dr.

A large amount of dirt from construction creates a temporary obstruction to pedestrians by covering the sidewalk and waiting area.

B.2.1 One time maintenance to remove obstruction.

(24)

24

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 24 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Lake Underhill Rd.

There is no waiting area present on the southeast corner, by Winn Dixie. This is an intersection of two arterial roadways with 45 mph speed limits.

B.3.1

Extend waiting area so that large groups of pedestrians waiting to cross are not forced to stand in the grass or street. 25 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Golfway Blvd.

There are no crosswalks over Alafaya Trail. This is significant because there are no crosswalks across Alafaya in this area at all. This makes it difficult for pedestrians coming down Alafaya Trail from Stoneybrook area to cross the street safely.

B.3.2

Install crosswalk to allow pedestrians coming from this area to cross Alafaya Trail safely.

Traffic Characteristics

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 26 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Golfway Blvd. Traffic characteristics: Vehicles turning right onto Alafaya Trail regularly block crosswalk and threaten pedestrians.

B.7.1

Require traffic to stop farther back from the crosswalk.

(25)

25

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 27 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Waterford Town Center Entrance.

The detectable warnings on both sides of crossing at Town Center entrance at Super Target are faded. This can pose a threat to

pedestrians with visual impairments if they cannot distinguish the detectable warning from the rest of the sidewalk.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to replace the detectable warnings. 28 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Lake Underhill Rd.

On the southeast corner of this intersection, by Winn Dixie, the crosswalks are partially paved over.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 29 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Lake Underhill Rd.

The crosswalks across Alafaya on both sides are faded and partially missing.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 30 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and S.R 408

The crosswalk across the entrance to the Waterford Town Center is faded

B.8.1

(26)

26 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 31 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and S.R 408

The detectable warnings on both sides of crossing at Town Center entrance are faded.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to replace the detectable warnings. 32 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Waterford Lakes Parkway

The detectable warnings on

southeast corner are faded. B.8.1

One time maintenance to replace the detectable warnings. 33 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Waterford Lakes Parkway

The etching on northeast corner is faded and inadequate. B.8.1 Replace detectable warnings. 34 Alafaya Trail and entrance to Waterford Town Center, between S. R. 408 and Waterford Lakes Parkway.

The crosswalk across the Waterford Lakes Town Center entrance at Fridays and Chic-Fil-A are faded and partially missing.

B.8.1

(27)

27 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 35 Alafaya Trail and entrance to Waterford Town Center, between S. R. 408 and Waterford Lakes Parkway.

The detectable warnings on both sides of the Waterford Lakes Town Center entrance at Fridays and Chic-Fil-A are faded

B.8.1

One time maintenance to replace the detectable warnings. 36 Intersection of Alafaya Trail and Curry Ford Rd.

The crosswalks across Alafaya Trail are very faded and partially missing.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 37 Lake Underhill Rd. and entrance to Waterford Elementary

The crosswalks across the both entrances to Waterford Elementary on this road are almost completely faded and covered in dire due to construction.

B.8.1

(28)

28 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 38 Woodbury Rd. and entrance to Waterford Elementary between Lake Underhill Rd. and Woodbury pines Rd.

The crosswalk across the entrance to Waterford Elementary is very faded and partially missing.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 39 Golfway Blvd. and Jewelstone Way

The crosswalk across

Jewelstone Way (Woodlands Point neighborhood) is faded.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 40 Lake Underhill and Kelly Green Dr.

The crosswalk across Kelly Green Dr. (Emerald Trace neighborhood) is faded.

B.8.1

crosswalk.

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 41 Alafaya Trail and Waterford Town Center Entrance. Between Lake Underhill and 408

The crosswalk across the Town Center entrance at Super target is fading

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 42 Alafaya Trail and Waterford Town Center Entrance. Between Lake Underhill and 408

The crosswalk across Alafaya Trail at The Waterford Town Center entrance at Super Target is beginning to fade

B.8.1

(29)

29 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 43 Lake Underhill Rd. between Alafaya Trail and Mark Twain Blvd

The crosswalk across the entrance to Winn Dixie is faded and partially missing.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 44 Intersection of Woodbury Rd. and Lake Underhill Rd.

The crossing signals at three corners of this intersection are missing letters.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 45 Waterford Lakes Blvd. between Woodbury Rd. and Alafaya Tr.

The crosswalk across the Beef-o-Bradys entrance is faded and partially missing.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 46 Waterford Lakes Blvd. between Woodbury Rd. and Alafaya Tr.

The crosswalk across the Boston Coffee House entrance is faded and partially missing.

B.8.1

(30)

30 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 47 Waterford Lakes Blvd. between Woodbury Rd. and Alafaya Tr.

The crosswalk and

detectable warnings across Vilas apartment complex entrance are faded and partially missing

B.8.1

crosswalk.

One time maintenance to replace detectable warnings. 48 Colonial and Holiday Inn Entrance. Between River Reach Dr. and Woodbury Rd.

On the west end, the detectable warnings are unattached. On the east end, the detectable warnings are covered in dirt from construction.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 49 Curry Ford Rd and entrance to Wall-mart Neighborhood Center Plaza between Alafaya Tr. And Arbor View Blvd.

The crosswalks at both entrances to Wall-mart plaza are faded and missing.

B.8.1

(31)

31 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 50 Lake Underhill Rd. and Seascape Ave. between Woodbury and Waterford Chase Parkway

Faded crosswalk across Seascape Ave (Bradfort Lakes neighborhood)

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint the crosswalk. 51 Lake Underhill rd. and Carringdale Dr. between Jadestone Cir. And Magnolia Glen Cir.

Faded crosswalk across Carringdale Dr. (Carrington Lakes neighborhood)

B.8.1

(32)

32

Table 4: Waterford Elementary Study Area Street Segment Issues

(33)

33

(34)

34

(35)

35

(36)

36

(37)

37

(38)

38

(39)

39

(40)

40

(41)

41

(42)

42

Lake Silver - Street Segments

FHWA

Prompt Recommendation

1

Orange Blossom Trail between Country Club and Princeton St. There are no sidewalks on either side of this section of Orange Blossom Trail. A.1.1 Consider installation of sidewalk or walkable shoulder. Otherwise children walking to school must travel on local roads, many of which also lack sidewalks. 2 Orange Blossom Trail between Colonial Dr. and Golfview St. There are no sidewalks on either side of this section of Orange Blossom Trail. A.1.1 Consider installation of sidewalk or walkable shoulder. Otherwise children walking to school must travel on local roads, many of which also lack sidewalks.

(43)

43 Issue

FHWA

3

Taft Ave. between Silver Star Rd. and Tulane Ave.

There are no sidewalks along Tuft Ave.

A.1.1 Install sidewalk or walkable shoulder. 4 Orange Blossom Trail between Country Club Dr. and Golfview St. There is no buffer between the northbound sidewalk the roadway. This is a principal arterial roadway with a 40 mph speed limit and heavy traffic volume.

A.1.5

Install bike lane or landscaped buffer to separate pedestrian traffic from vehicular traffic. 5 Princeton St. between I-4 and Princeton Ct.

There is no buffer between the westbound sidewalk and the street. The only exception is between Helen Ave. and Elizabeth Ave. in front of Princeton Elementary School. This is a minor arterial roadway with a 40 mph speed limit and heavy traffic volume.

A.1.5

Install bike lane or landscaped buffer to separate pedestrian traffic from vehicular traffic.

(44)

44

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 6 Princeton St. between Amhurst Ave. and Oberlin Ave. Vine overgrowth partially obstructs the westbound sidewalk. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction. 7 Princeton St. between Elizabeth Ave. and Princeton Ct.

Plant and tree overgrowth obstruct the westbound sidewalk. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction. 8 Princeton St. between Harrison Ave. and Ivanhoe Rd. Tree overgrowth narrow the eastbound sidewalk across from Princeton Elementary. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction.

(45)

45 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 9 Princeton St. between Ivanhoe Rd. and Gerda Terrace.

Plant and tree overgrowth narrow the eastbound sidewalk. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction. 10 Northumberla nd Ave. between Stetson St. and Yale St. A portion of the northbound sidewalk is broken and uneven.

A.2.4 Repair or replace sidewalk panel 11 Edgewater Dr. between Langston Ct. and Guernesy St. The northbound sidewalk in front of the church is broken.

A.2.4 Repair or replace sidewalk panel 12 Rio Grande Ave. between Tulane Ave. and Vasar St. Portion of the southbound sidewalk across from Lake Silver Elementary is broken.

A.2.4 Repair or replace sidewalk panel

(46)

46 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 13 New Hampshire St. between Reading St. and Northumberla nd Ave. A portion of the eastbound sidewalk is uneven. A.2.4 One time maintenance to repair sidewalk panel 14 Northumberla nd Ave. between Princeton St. and Smith St. A portion of southbound sidewalk is raised and uneven. A.2.4 One time maintenance to repair sidewalk panel 15 Smith St. between Nichols St. and Rio Grande Ave. A portion of eastbound sidewalk in front of

Overchuck Law firm is uneven. A.2.4 One time maintenance to repair sidewalk panel Secondary Issues Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 16 Harvard St. between Rio Grande Ave. and Florinda Dr. Several portions of the eastbound sidewalk are broken.

(47)

47 Issue

FHWA

17

Roosevelt Ave. between Taft Ave. and Coolidge Ave.

Overgrowth and debris obstruct the westbound sidewalk A.2.2 Require homeowners to maintain property. 18 Orange Blossom Trail Between Shader Rd. and Silver Star Rd. A tree partially blocks the southbound sidewalk at the railroad tracks. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction 19 Princeton St. between Obrelin Ave. and Helen Ave. Numerous temporary obstructions from trash bins blocking the westbound sidewalk.

A.2.2 Prohibit this type of obstruction 20 Orange Blossom Trail between Ellman St. and Silver Star Rd. Overgrowth narrows the northbound sidewalk A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction

(48)

48 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 21 Ellwood Ave. between Atkins Pl. and Seville Pl. Overgrowth partially obstructs both the northbound and southbound sidewalks. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction 22 Rio Grande Ave. between Vassar St. and Smith St. Overgrowth narrows the southbound sidewalk. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction 23 Smith St. between Edgewater Dr. and Westmoreland Dr. Numerous temporary obstructions from cars blocking the westbound sidewalk.

A.2.2 Prohibit this type of obstruction 24 Rio Grande Ave. between Tulane Ave and Vassar St. Overgrown grass partially obstructs the northbound sidewalk. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction

(49)

49 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 25 Cumbie Ave. between Coolidge Ave. and Taft Ave.

Overgrown grass obstructs the sidewalk on the westbound side in front of the for sale lot. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction 26 Westmoreland Dr. between Smith St. and Vassar St. Plant overgrowth narrows the northbound sidewalk. Also temporary obstructions from cars blocking the sidewalk.

A.2.2

Regular maintenance to remove obstruction. Prohibit this type of obstruction 27 Bryn Mawr St. between Westmoreland Dr. and Holly Ln.

Tree and grass overgrowth narrow the sidewalk width on the eastbound side. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction 28 Northumberla nd Ave. between Harvard St. and Princeton St. Tree overgrowth narrows and obstructs the sidewalk on the northbound side. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction

(50)

50 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 29 Orange Blossom Trail Between Shader Rd. and Silver Star Rd.

Broken sidewalk in front of Oasis Ministries

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 30 Rio Grande Ave. between Bryn Mawr St. and Smith St.

There is only a partial southbound sidewalk. This area is near Lake Silver Elementary and would benefit from continuous sidewalks on both sides of the road.

A.3.1

Install sidewalk along this portion of the roadway. 31 Smith St. between Coolidge Ave. and Orange Blossom Trail A portion of the sidewalk on the westbound sidewalk is missing.

A.3.1 Replace sidewalk panels.

(51)

51 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 32 Smith St. between Nichols St. and Coolidge Ave. A portion ofthe westbound sidewalk is missing.

33

Roosevelt Ave. between Taft Ave. and Coolidge Ave.

The eastbound sidewalk is non-continuous

A.3.1 Connect partial sidewalk segments.

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 34 Orange Blossom Trail Between Shader Rd. and Silver Star Rd.

The southbound sidewalk disappears into a parking lot

A.3.1 35 Sheridan Blvd. between Poinsettia Ave. and Edgewater Dr.

There are a series of partial, unconnected sidewalks on both sides of the road.

A.3.1 Connect partial sidewalk segments.

(52)

52

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 36 Orange Blossom Trail Between Shader Rd. and Silver Star Rd. There is no marked means of crossing Orange Blossom Trail for residents of the mobile home parks on the northbound side of the road. There are also no sidewalks on the northbound side of the road. A.8.1 Install marked crosswalk across Orange Blossom Trail.

Lake Silver - Street Crossings

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 37 Intersection of Rio Grande Ave. and Bryn Mawr St. Sidewalk layout requires pedestrians crossing Bryn Mawr St. on the northbound side to walk in the roadway.

B.1.10

Reposition curb so that sidewalk is aligned with the crosswalk. 38 Intersection of Florinda Dr. and Princeton St.

The sidewalk and curb ramp layout forces pedestrians crossing Princeton St. to walk in the path of vehicular traffic.

(53)

53 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 39 Intersection of Reading Dr. and Princeton St.

The sidewalk and curb ramp layout forces pedestrians crossing Princeton St. to walk in the path of vehicular traffic.

B.1.10 Install curb ramps

40

Intersection of Edgewater Dr. and Princeton St.

The sidewalk and curb ramp layout forces pedestrians crossing Edgewater Dr. to walk into the path of vehicular traffic.

B.1.10

Reposition curb ramp so that it is aligned with the crosswalk

41

Intersection of

Northumberl and Ave. and Yates St.

The sidewalk and curb ramp layout forces pedestrians crossing Yates St. to walk into the path of vehicular traffic. B.1.10 Reposition curb ramps 42 Intersection of Princeton St. and Depaw Ave.

The sidewalk and curb ramp layout forces pedestrians crossing Depaw Ave. to walk dangerously close to vehicular traffic. B.1.10 Reposition curb ramp so that it is aligned with the crosswalk

(54)

54

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 43 Intersection of Reading Dr. and Yale St.

Plants on the northeast corner narrow the width of the sidewalk at this point. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction 44 Intersection of Northumberl and Ave. and Princeton St.

Debris/overgrowth on both curb ramps on the southeast corner

45

Intersection of

Northumberl and Ave. and Princeton St.

Debris/overgrowth on both curb ramps on the northwest corner

A.2.2

Regular maintenance to remove obstruction

(55)

55 Issue

FHWA

46

Intersection of Cumbie Ave. and Rio Grande Ave.

Broken sidewalk at

northwest corner. A.2.4

Replace sidewalk panel 47 Intersection of Florinda Dr. and Vassar St.

The crosswalk across Vassar St. is missing a panel. B.2.1 Replace missing crosswalk panel 48 Intersection of Reading Dr. and New Hampshire St.

The roadway in front of the curb ramps on the southbound side collect water and obstruct pedestrian travel. B.2.1 Adjust roadway grade to remove drainage issue 49 Intersection of Formosa Ave. and King St.

Curb on the south east corner collects water and obstructs pedestrian travel B.2.1 Adjust roadway grade to remove drainage issue

(56)

56 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 50 Intersection of New Hampshire St. and Florinda Dr.

The curb on the northeast corner collects water and obstructs pedestrian movement. B.2.1 Adjust roadway grade to remove drainage issue Secondary Issues Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 51 Intersection of Princeton St. and Musselwhite Ave.

Post narrows sidewalk width at northwest corner.

A.2.2

Install waiting area so pedestrians are not forces to pass so close to vehicular traffic. 52 Intersection of Princeton st. and Helen Ave.

Post on the southeast corner narrows the sidewalk width.

A.2.2

Install waiting area so pedestrians are not forces to pass so close to vehicular traffic.

(57)

57

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 53 Intersection of Guernesy St. and Clouser Ave.

There are no curb ramps on any corners of this intersection.

54 Intersection of Westmorelan d Dr. and Yates St.

The sidewalk does not continue across Westmoreland Dr., no curb ramp is present

55

Intersection of Tulane Ave. and Rio Grande Ave.

There is no marked way to cross Rio Grande Ave. to get to Lake Silver

Elementary. This is dangerous because there is also no

sidewalk on this side of the road.

B.3.1

Install marked crosswalk across Rio Grande Ave. Install additional school area signage to alert drivers to crossing pedestrians.

(58)

58 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 56 Intersection of Roosevelt Ave. and Coolidge Ave.

The sidewalk does not continue across Coolidge Ave. B.3.1 Extend sidewalk so that it continues across Coolidge Ave. 57 Intersection of Cumbie Ave. and Coolidge Ave.

The sidewalk does not continue across any portions of the intersection. B.3.1 Extend sidewalk so that is connects across Coolidge Ave. 58 Intersection of Cumbie Ave. and Taft Ave.

The sidewalk does not continue across Cumbie Ave.

B.3.1

Extend sidewalk so that it connects across Cumbie Ave.

59 Intersection of Rio Grande Ave. and Knollwood St.

There are no curb ramps that allow pedestrians to cross Knollwood St.

(59)

59 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 60 Intersection of Silverstar Rd. and Coolidge Ave.

There are no curb ramps that allow pedestrians to cross CoolidgeSt.

61 Intersection of Silverstar Rd., and Crestwood Dr.

There are no curb ramps that allow pedestrians to cross CoolidgeSt.

(60)

60 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 62 Intersection of Westmorelan d Dr. and Vassar. St.

There are no curb ramps to allow pedestrians to cross Westmoreland Dr.

63 Intersection of Westmorelan d Dr. and Bryn Mawr St.

There are no curb ramps to allow

pedestrians to any parts of this intersection.

64

Intersection of

Northumberl and Ave. and Shady Lane Dr.

There are no curb ramps to allow pedestrians to cross Shady Lane. Dr.

B.3.1 Install curb ramp on northeastern corner.

(61)

61 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 65 Intersection of Northumberl and Ave. and Guernsey St.

There are no curb ramps to assist

pedestrians in crossing Guernsey St.

66

Intersection of

Northumberl and Ave. and Stetson St.

There is no curb ramp to assist pedestrians in crossing Stetson St.

B.3.1

Install curb ramps/ Extend sidewalk so that it connects across Stetson St. 67 Intersection of Northumberl and Ave. and Yale St.

There are no curb ramps to assist

pedestrians in crossing Yale St.

68

Intersection of

Northumberl and Ave. and Vassar St.

There are no curb ramps and the sidewalk does no continue across Vassar St.

B.3.1

Install curb ramps/ Extend sidewalk so that it connects across Vassar St.

(62)

62 Secondary Issues Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 69 Intersection of Edgewater Dr. and Lakeview St. There is no means of crossing Lakeview St. and it is unclear where a safe place to cross is.

B.3.1

Install pavement markings to direct pedestrians to safe crossing points.

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 70 Intersection of Westmorelan d Dr. and Overbrook Dr.

The crosswalk across Overbrook St. is faded and mostly missing.

B.8.1 One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 71 Intersection of Rio Grande Ave. and Vassar St.

The crosswalk across Vassar St. is fading and broken.

B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk.

(63)

63 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 72 Intersection of Florinda Dr. and Vassar St.

The crosswalk across Florinda Dr. is faded and broken. B.8.1 One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 73 Intersection of Edgewater Dr. and Smith St.

The crosswalk signal

sign is painted over. B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk sign. 74 Intersection of Formosa Ave. and King St.

Formosa Ave. is faded B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 75 Intersection of Princeton St. and Formosa Ave.

The crosswalk across Formosa Ave. is very faded.

B.8.1

(64)

64 Issue

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 76 Intersection of Princeton St. and Musselwhite Ave.

The crosswalk across Musselwhite Ave. on the westbound side is faded.

B.8.1 One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 77 Intersection of Princeton St. and Helen Ave.

Helen Ave. is faded B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 78 Intersection of Princeton St. and Elizabeth Ave. Crosswalk across

Elizabeth Ave. is faded. B.8.1

One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 79 Intersection of Princeton St. and University. Dr.

The crosswalk across University Dr. is very faded and mostly missing.

B.8.1

(65)

65

Table 6: Lake Silver Elementary Street Segments Issues

(66)

66

(67)

67

(68)

68

(69)

69

(70)

70

(71)

71

(72)

72

(73)

73

Shingle Creek - Street Segments

# Location Issue Photo Prompt Recommendation

1 Brookgreen Ave. between Oak Ridge Rd. and David Ave. There is no sidewalk on this portion of roadway, which forces all pedestrians travelling to Shingle Creek Elementary to take Harcourt Ave.

A.1.1 Install sidewalk

2 Wingate Dr. between Oak Ridge Rd. and Abbott Dr. Narrow sidewalk width inhibits flow of pedestrian groups.

A.1.4 Expand sidewalk width. 3 Citadel Dr. between Doane St. and Kingsbridge Dr Narrow sidewalk width inhibits flow of pedestrian groups.

A.1.4 Expand sidewalk width.

(74)

74

FHWA Prompt Recommendation 4 Oakridge Rd. between Kingsgate Dr. and Singing Creek Ln.

The median at the entrance to

Oakridge Crossings by the 7-11 on the westbound side of the road blocks the path of crossing pedestrians.

A.2.2 Remove or redesign median. 5 Wingate Dr. between Oak Ridge Rd. and Abbott Dr. Grass overgrowth combined with narrow sidewalk width inhibits flow of pedestrians. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove hazard. 6 Abbott Dr. between Wingate Dr. and Citadel Dr. Grass overgrowth combined with narrow sidewalk width inhibits flow of pedestrians. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove hazard. 7 Citadel Dr. between Doane St. and Kingsbridge Dr. Grass overgrowth combined with narrow sidewalk width inhibits flow of pedestrians.

A.2.2

Regular

maintenance to remove hazard.

(75)

75 Issue

FHWA

8

Oak Ridge Rd. between John Young Pkwy. and Magic Way.

The cross slope of the sidewalk is very steep here.

Combined with the narrow buffer, this creates a potential hazard.

A.2.3 Adjust sidewalk cross slope. 9 Millenia Blvd. between North and South entrances to the Villages Apartments The northbound is cracked and uneven at several locations.

A.2.4 Repair or replace sidewalk panels.

10

Millenia Blvd. between Northbridge Dr. and Oak Ridge Rd.

The northbound sidewalk d is broken and uneven just passed the south entrance to the Villages apartment complex

11

Millenia Blvd. between Northbridge Dr. and Oak Ridge Rd.

The northbound sidewalk near the entrance to 7-11 is raised.

(76)

76 Issue

12

Oak Ridge Rd. Between Ridge Club Loop and Fairlawn Dr.

Several portions of the eastbound sidewalk are broken.

13 Oak Ridge Rd. midway between Millenia Blvd. and Ridge Club Loop A portion of the eastbound sidewalk is raised.

A.2.4 Repair or replace sidewalk panel. 14 Oak Ridge Rd. Between Ridge Club Loop and Fairlawn Dr. Slight overgrowth from trees narrows the eastbound sidewalk A.2.2 Regular maintenance to prevent obstruction. 15 Cardinal Guard Ave. between Canna Dr. and Salvia Dr. Grass overgrowth narrows the northbound sidewalk. A.2.2 Regular maintenance to prevent obstruction.

(77)

77 Issue

16

Canna Dr. between Harcourt Ave. and Tulip Ave.

Open residential fences block the sidewalk.

A.2.2

Signage and Pavement Markings

17 Oak Ridge Rd. between John Young Pkwy. And Oak Hill Manor Dr.

The crosswalk across the entrance to the Racetrack gas station on the eastbound side of the road is faded.

B.8.1

(78)

78

Shingle Creek - Street Crossings

18 Intersection of John Young Pkwy. and Oak Ridge Rd. This is an intersection of a major collector rd. (Oak Ridge Rd.) with a 40 mph speed limit, and a principal arterial road (John Young Pkwy) with a 45 mph speed limit, which both have heavy traffic volumes. A lack of crossing island makes it difficult for groups of

pedestrians to cross the road with ease.

B.1.5 Install crossing island.

19 Intersection of Oak Ridge Rd. and Chancellor Dr.

The curb ramps are not aligned with the crossing island.

(79)

79

20 Interection of Harcourt Ave. and Calendula Dr. Overgrowth on all corners of this intersection obstruct pedestrian travel.

A.2.2 Regular maintenance to remove obstruction

21 Intersection of Harcourt Ave. and Ligustrum Way

The sidewalk does not continue unobstructed across either Harcourt or Ligustrum on the Northeast corner B.3.1 Extend sidewalk to remove crossing obstruction

(80)

80

Signage and Pavement Markings

22 Intersection of Oakridge Rd. and International Dr.

The street crossing signage on the northeast corner is faded and barely legible. B.8.1 Replace 23 Intersection of Oakridge Rd. and International Dr.

The street crossing signage on the northwest corner is faded and barely legible. B.8.1 Replace 24 Intersection of Oakridge Rd. and International Dr.

The west most crosswalk across Oakridge road is fading

B.8.1 One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 25 Intersection of Millennia Blvd. and Northbridge Dr. The crosswalk across Northbridge Dr. ion the northbound side of the road is faded.

B.8.1 One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk.

(81)

81 Issue

26 Intersection of Millenia Blvd. and North entrance to the Villages Apartments The crosswalk across the entrance to the Villages apartment complex on the northbound side of the road is faded.

B.8.1 One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 27 Intersection of Millenia Blvd. and South entrance to the Villages Apartments The crosswalk across the entrance to the Villages apartment complex on the northbound side of the road is faded.

B.8.1 One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 28 Intersection of Oak Ridge Rd. and Magic Way. The crosswalk across Magic Way on the westbound side of the road is faded.

B.8.1 One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk. 29 Intersection of Oak Ridge Rd. and west most entrance to Westridge Middle School. The crosswalk across the entrance to Westridge Middle School is faded.

B.8.1 One time maintenance to repaint crosswalk.

(82)

82

30 Intersection of Millenia Blvd. and Northbridge Dr. Detectable warnings on the noorthbound sidewalk are worn.

B.8.1 Repair or replace 31 Intersection of John Young Pkwy. And Oak Ridge Rd. Crosswalk signs on the northwest and northeast corners are missing letters. (Does not say John Young).

(83)

83

Table 8: Shingle Creek Elementary Street Sections Issues

(84)

84

(85)

85

(86)

86

Orange County Public Schools Pedestrian Road Safety and Walkability Audit