• No results found

Dynamic ploidy changes drive fluconazole resistance in human cryptococcal meningitis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Dynamic ploidy changes drive fluconazole resistance in human cryptococcal meningitis"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Figure 1. Flowchart of patients recruited to the clinical observational study. Patients in cohort 1 received induction treatment as per local treatment policy, either 800 mg or 1200 mg per day FLC for the first 2 weeks
Figure 2. Phenotypes of tolerance and heteroresistance. Cnsmaller and more translucent at 16 mg/l
Figure 3. Heteroresistance is a continuous variable
Figure 4. FLC monotherapy causes an increase in the resistant subpopulation in patient CSF, which can be prevented by the addition of 5FC
+7

References

Related documents

18 Passive resistance, referred to by Noel Dyck, continued but “Indian veterans were instrumental in the creation of the first nationwide Indian political organization —

Abstract —This paper amalgamates two uncorrelated techniques namely finite difference time domain technique (FDTD) and nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input (NARX) neural

Building upon the existing structure of the Office of the Dean of Undergraduate & University Studies and the Department of University Studies, the University College will

Autocorrelation-based Factor Analysis and Nonlinear Shrinkage Estimation of Large Integrated covariance matrix..

IAPT: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies; MINI: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; NICE: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; NIHR:

Second, we test MAC’s prediction that each of these types of cooperation will be considered morally relevant, and each will give rise to a distinct moral domain, by developing a

antibody mimetic against HER2, called bH1, displayed similar binding a ffi nity as trastuzumab (anti-HER-2 antibody) using SPR, but di ff erent binding thermodynamics (enthalpy

There are, of course, many valid reasons why applied psychologists may not be research active (Holttum & Goble, 2006) – many employers may prefer psychologists to be involved