• No results found

The practice and procedure of the Human Rights Committee under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The practice and procedure of the Human Rights Committee under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights"

Copied!
452
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

McGoldrick, Dominic (1988) The practice and procedure of the Human Rights Committee under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. PhD thesis,

University of Nottingham.

Access from the University of Nottingham repository:

http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11742/1/234240_VOL1.pdf

Copyright and reuse:

The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions.

· Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to

the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners.

· To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in Nottingham

ePrints has been checked for eligibility before being made available.

· Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or

not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.

· Quotations or similar reproductions must be sufficiently acknowledged.

Please see our full end user licence at:

http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf

A note on versions:

The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

(2)

9

"THE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE UNDER THE

INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS".

by DOMINIC McGOLDRICK, LL. B.

VOLUME 1.

Thesis presented to Nottingham University for the

Degree of Doctor Of Philosophy, October, 1988.

(11I NGHArI

(3)

BEST COPY

AVAILABLE

Poor text in the original

thesis.

Some text bound close to

the spine.

(4)

ABSTRACT. ABSTRACT.

This thesis examines the practices and procedures of the Human Rights Committee, the body established under the International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights (ICCPR) (1966).

Chapter 1 examines the origins of the ICCPR, the

principal drafting issues that arose, and the

significance of the ICCPR in international law. Chapter

2 examines the organisation and the institutional

characteristics of the Human Rights. Committee. Chapter 3

examines and evaluates the practices and procedures of

the Human Rights Committee under the reporting procedure

in article 40 ICCPR. Chapter 4 examines and evaluates

the practices and procedures of the Human Rights

Committee under the provisions for individual

communications in the Optional Protocol to the ICCPR.

Chapters 5-12 examine the jurisprudence of the

Human Rights Committee under the reporting procedure

(article 40) and the Optional Protocol in respect of

selected articles of the ICCPR. Chapter 5 considers

article 1 (self-determination). Chapter. 6 considers

article 2 (general obligations to respect and ensure the

rights in the ICCPR, to give effect to it, and to

provide a remedy in the event of violation). Chapter 7

considers article 4 (derogation provision). Chapter 8

considers article 6 (right to life). Chapter 9 considers

article 7, (torture and other prohibited treatment and

punishment), and, in part, article 10 (treatment of

persons deprived of their liberty). Chapter 10 considers

article 14 (fair trial). Chapter 11 considers article 19

(freedom of opinion and expression). Chapter 12

considers article 20 (war propaganda and advocacy of

national, racial or religious hatred).

Chapter 13 provides a general appraisal of the the

(5)

CONTENTS.

CONTENTS. PAGE.

ABSTRACT.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. TABLE OF CASES.

TABLE OF TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS. TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS.

STATES PARTIES TO THE INTERNATIONht COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS.

INTRODUCTION.

CHAPTER 1: The Origins, Drafting and Significance of the International Covenant on Civil and

Political Rights. 1.

A. Origins. 3.

B. Drafting. 9.

C. One Covenant Or Two. 26.

D. Progressive

Or Immediate

Obligations.

29.

E. International Measures Of Implementation. 32.

F. Self-Determination. 36.

G. The Territorial

(Colonial

Clause),

The Federal

Clause, Reservations. 40.

H. The Pcoitions Of The Superpowers. 42.

I. An Outline Of The ICCPR. 48.

J. The Significance Of The ICCPR In

International Law. 54.

CHAPTER 2: The Human Rights. Commi ;. tae . 66.

Introduction. 66.

A. Membership. 66.

B. Election. 71.

C. Organization Of Work. 74.

D. Functions. 81.

E. Relations With The Secretariat. 83.

F. The Status Of The Human Rights Committee. 87.

G. The Nature Of The Human Rights committee. 89.

CHAPTER 3: The System Of Periodic Reporting. 94.

Introduction. 94.

A. The National Reports: 97.

1. Initial Reports. 98.

2. Supplementary (or Additional) Rep". rtV. 101.

3. Periodic Reports. 105.

4. The Periodicity of Reports. 107.

B. The Submission Of Reports. 115.

C. Sources Of Information. 123.

D. The Process Of Consideration: Initial And

Supplementary Reports. 137.

1. The First Round. 138.

2. The Second Round. 139.

E. The Process Of Consideration: Periodic Reports. 148.

F. The Co: -imittee's Jurisdiction Under Article 40. 154.

G. The Role Of The Economic And Social Council. 169.

H. The Annual Report Of The Human Rights

Committee

To The General

Assembly.

170.

(6)

I, VLVlri rVlo.

CHAPTER 4: The Optional Protocol To The International Covenant On Civil And

Political Rights. 184.

Introduction. 184.

A. The Origins, Drafting And Significance Of The

Optional Protocol To The ICCPR. 188.

B. The Structure And Terms Of The Optional

Protocol To The ICCPR. 195.

C. Status Of The O. P.; Status Of Communications

Under The O. P. 203.

D. The Procedural Functioning Of The O. P. 207.

1. The Receipt And Transmission Of Communications. 207.

2. General Provisions Regarding The Consideration

Of Communications. 214.

3. Access To The Human Rights Committee. 219.

4. Legal Representation And Legal Aid. 224.

5. The Determination Of Admissibility: Procedures. 227.

6. The Consideration Of Communications On The

Merits: Procedures. 237.

7. Evidence. 241.

(1) Admissibility. 241.

(2) Form. 243.

(3) The Burden And Standard Of Proof. 248.

8. Final Views Under The O. P. 259.

E. The Interpretation And Application Of The O. P. 274.

1. The Function Of The HRC Under The O. P. 274.

2. The Interpretation Of The ICCPR And The O. P. 278.

3. Incompatibility With The Provisions Of The

Covenant. 284.

(a) Ratione Temporis. 284.

(b) Ratione Materiae. 288.

(c) Ratione Personae. 302.

(i) Against Whom May A Communication Be Brought? 302.

(ii) By Whom May A Communication Be Brought? 304.

(iii) The Requirement That The Individual Has

Been A Victim. 314.

(d) Ratione Loci. 325.

4. The Same Matter Is Not Being Examined Under

Another Procedure Of International

Investigation Or Settlement. 336.

5. The Individual Has Exhausted All Available

Domestic Remedies. 351.

Introduction. 351.

(a) The Burden Of Proof As To Exhaustion. 353.

(b) The Remedies To Be Exhausted. 356.

(c) Relief From The Duty Of Execution. 361.

(d) Does The Exhaustion Rule Apply Where An

Application Is Directed Against Legislative

Measures Or An Administrative Practice? 372.

(e) Domestic Remedies: An Appraisal. 374.

6. Abuse Of The Right Of Submission. 377.

7. Anonymous Communications. 377.

F. The Optional Protocol: Significance, Appraisal

And Prospects. 378.

(i) The Status Of The Individual. 378.

(ii) The Human Rights Committee Under The O. P. 379.

(iii) The Effectiveness Of The O. P. For

(7)

CONTENTS.

CHAPTER 5: Article 1. 393.

Introduction. 394.

A. Article 1 Under The Reporting Process. 394.

Article 1 (1). 400.

Article

1 (2).

405.

Article 1 (3). 408.

B. Article 1 Under The Optional Protocol. 416.

Appraisal. 422.

CHAPTER 6: Article 2. 426.

Introduction. 428.

A. Article 2 Under The Reporting Process. 428.

Article 2 (1). 428.

Article 2 (2). 435.

Article 2 (3). 451.

B. Article 2 Under The Optional Protocol. 456.

Article 2 (1). 456. Article 2 (2). 463. Article 2 (3). 464. Appraisal, 470. CHAPTER 7: Article 4. 472. Introduction. 473.

A. Article 4 Under The Reporting Process. 476.

Article 4 (1). 476.

Article 4 (2). 487.

Article 4 (3). 489.

The United Kingdom And Article 4. 494.

B. Article 4 Under The Optional Protocol. 502.

Appraisal. 511.

CHAPTER 8: Article 6. 517.

Introduction. 518.

A. Article 6 Under The Reporting Process. 520.

B. Article 6 Under The Optional Protocol. 543.

Appraisal. 569.

CHAPTER 9: Article 7. 573.

Introduction. 574.

A. Article 7 Under The Reporting Process. 574.

B. Article 7 (and 10(1) Under The Optional

Protocol. 588.

Appraisal 619.

CHAPTER 10: Article. 14. 624.

Introduction. 626.

A. Article 14 Under The Reporting Process. 626.

Article 14 (1). 629.

(a) The, Neture And Jurisdiction Of Courts

And Tribunals. 634.

(b) The Separation Of Powers. 638.

(c) The Judiciary. 638.

(d) The 'Public Hearing' Guarantee. 644.

Fair Hearing; Competent, Independent And

Impartial Tribunal. 648.

Article 14 (2). 649.

Article 14 (3). 653.

Article 14 (4). 667.

(8)

CONTENT. -.

Article

14 (6).

673.

Article 14 (7). 676.

B. Article 14 Unde r The Optional Protocol. 678.

Introdu cti on. 678.

The Scope Of Ar ticle 14. 678.

Public Hea ring And Public Judgement. 686.

Article 14 (2). 689. Article 14 (3) (a). 689. Article 14 (3) (b). 691. Article 14 (3) (c) . 695. Article 14 (3) (d). 700. Article 14 (3) (e). 708. Article 14 (3) M. 708. Article 14 (3) (g). 709. Article 14 (4). 710. Article 14 (5). 710. Article 14 (6). 718. Article 14 (7). 720. Appraisal. 725. CHAPTER 11: Article 19. 730. Introduction. 731.

A. Article 19 Under The Reporting Process. 732.

Article 19 (1). 733.

Article 19 (2)-(3). 735.

B. Article 19 Under The Optional Protocol. 748.

Appraisal. 759.

CHAPTER 12: Article 20. 765.

Introduction. 765.

A. Article 20 Under The Reporting Process. 766.

Article 20 (1). 766.

Article 20 (2). 773.

The General Comment On Article 20. 775.

B. Article 20 Under The Optional Protocol. 790.

Appraisal. 793.

CHAPTER 13: Ap praisal And Prospectus. 795. APPENDICES.

1. The International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights.

II. The Optional Protocol To The International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights.

III. General Comments On The Position of Aliens Under The Covenant And On Article 17 (The Right To

Privacy).

IV. Model Communication Under The Optional Protocol. BIBLIOGRAPHY.

(9)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.

I acknowledge an enormous debt of gratitude to Professor

David Harris for his expert supervision. I can only hope

to repay him in some way in the course of time.

I would also like to thank the library staffs of the

University of Nottingham and Trent Polytechnic for their

unfailing assistance.

It would not have been possible to finish this thesis

without the continued encouragement the McGoldrick and

Owen families, and many friends. In particular I

acknowledge the support of my wife, April, and the

assistance of my brother, John.

(10)

Abliti (Jr, t-; tior. ý ,

TABLE OF CASES.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE.

A et al. v. S, 1 S. D. 3,17,35.

A. D. v. Canada, Doc. A/39/40 p. 200,

_"

A. M. v. Denmark, Doc. A/37/40 p. 212; 1 S. D. 32.

A. P. V. Italy, Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/204/1986, [to be

published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

A. R. S. v. Canada, 1 S. D. 29.

A. S. v. Canada, 1 S. D. 27.

Acosta v. Uruguay, Doc. A/39/40 p. 169.

Altesor v. Uruguay,. Doc. A/37/40 p., 122; 1 S. D. 6,105.

Ambrosini v. Uruguay, Doc. A/34/40 p. 124.

Antonaccio v. Uruguay, Doc. A/37/40 p. 114; 1 S. D. 101.

Aumeeruddy-Cziffra et al. v. Mauritius, Doc. A/36/40

p. 134; 1 S. D. 67.

B, C, D, and E v. S, 1 S. D. 11-12.

Baboeram and Others v. Suriname, Doc. A/40/40 p. 187.

Baritussio v. Uruguay, Doc. A/37/40 p. 187; 1 S. D. 136.

Barbato, G. I. D, v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 124.

Barbato, H. H. D, v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 124.

Bequio v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 180.

Blom V. Sweden, Doc. CCPR/C/32/D/191/1985, [to be

published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

Broeks v. Netherlands, Doc. A/42/40 p. 139.

C. A. v. Italy, Doc. A/38/40 p. 237.

C. E. v. Canada, 1 S. D. 16.

C. F. et al. v. Canada, Doc. A/40/40 p. 217.

C. J. v. Canada, 1 S. D. 23.

Cabreira v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 209.

Caldas v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 192.

Carballal v. Uruguay, Doc. A/36/40 p. 125; 1 S. D. 63.

Cariboni v. Uruguay, Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/159; 1983, [to be

published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

Casariego v. Uruguay, Doc. A/36/40 p. 185; 1 S. D. 92.

Conteris v. Uruguay, Doc. A/40/40 p. 196.

D. B. v. Canada, 1 S. D. 20.

D. F. et al. v. Sweden, Doc. A/40/40., p. 228.

Danning v. Netherlands, Doc. A/42/40 p. 151.

De Bazzano v. Uruguay, Doc. A/34/40 p. 124; 1 S. D. 37,40.

De Bleir v. Uruguay, Doc. A/37/40 p. 130; 1 S. D. 109.

De Bouton v. Uruguay, Doc. A/36/40 p. 143; 1 S. D. 72.

De Montejo v. Colombia, Doc. A/37/40 p. 168; 1 S. D. 127.

De Voituret v. Uruguay, Doc. A/39/40 p. 164.

E. B. V. S, 1 S. D. 11,39.

E. H. V. Finland, Doc. A/41/40 p. 166.

Estrella v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 150.

Ex-Philibert v. Zaire, Doc. A/38/40 p. 197.

F. G. G. v. Netherlands, Doc. A/42/40 p. 180.

Fals Borda v. Colombia, Doc. A/37/40 p. 193; 1 S. D. 139.

(11)

TABLE OF CASES.

Gilboa v. Uruguay, Doc. A/41/40 p. 128.

Grille Motta v. Uruguay, Doc. A/35/40 p. 132; 1 S. D. 54.

Group of assocations for the defence of the rights of

disabled and handicapped persons in Italy, Doc. A/39/40

p. 197.

Guerrero v. Colombia, Doc. A/37/40 p. 137; 1 S. D. 112.

H. S. v. France, Doc. A/41/40 p. 169.

H. v. d. P. v. Netherlands, Doc. A/42/40 p. 185.

Hammel v. Madagascar, Doc. A/42/40 p. 130.

Hartikainen v. Finland, Doc. A/36/40 p. 147; 1 S. D. 74.

Hertzberg et al. v. Finland, Doc. A/37/40 p. 161; 1 S. D.

124.

i. v. S, 1 S. D. 35.

I. M. v. rrorway, Doc. A/38/40 p. 241.

Izquierdo v. Uruguay, Doc. A/37/40 p. 179; 1 S. D. 7,132.

J. B. et al. v. Canada, Doc. A/41/40 p. 151.

J. D. B. v, Netherlands, Doc. A/40/40 p. 226.

J. H. v. Canada, Doc. A/40/40 p. 230.

J. J. v. Denmark, 1 S. D. 26.

J. K. v. Canada, Doc. A/40/40 p. 215.

J. M. v. Jamaica, Doc. A/41/40 p. 164.

J. S. v. Canada, Doc. A/38/40 p. 243.

J. R. T and W. G. Party v. Canada, Doc. A/38/40 p. 231.

Jaona v. Madagascar, Doc. A/40/40 p. 179.

K. B. v. Norway, 1 S. D. 24.

K. L. v. Denmark, 1 S. D. 24. K. L. v. Denmark, 1 S. D. 26. K. L. v. Denmark, 1 S. D. 28.

L. A. on behalf of U. R. v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 239. L. P. v. Canada, 1 S. D. 21.

L. T. K. v. Finland, Doc. A/40/40 p. 240.

Lanza v. Uruguay, Doc. A/35/40 p. 111; 1 S. D. 45.

Lichtensztejn v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 166.

Lluberas v. Uruguay, Doc. A/39/40 p. 175.

Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay, Doc. A/36/40 p. 176; 1 S. D. 88. Lovelace v. Canada, Doc. A/36/40 p. 166; S. D. 10,37,

83.

M. A. V. S, 1 S. D. 5,20.

M. A. v. I1: aly, Doc. A/39/40 p. 190.

M. F. v. Netherlands, Doc. A/40/40 p. 213.

M. J. G. v. Netherlands, Doc. CCPR/C/. 32/D/267/1987, [to be

published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)]. -

Machado v. Uruguay, Doc. A/39/40 p. 148.

MacIsaac v. Canada, Doc. A/38/40 p. 111.

Marais V. Madagascar, Doc. A/38/40 p. 141.

Maroufidou v. Sweden, Doc. A/36/40 p. 160; 1 S. D. 80.

Massera, M. V, v. Uruguay, Doc. A/34/40 p. 124.

Massera, J. L, v. Uruguay, Doc. A/34/40 p. 124.

Massiotti v. Uruguay, Doc. A/37/40 p. 187; 1 S. D. 136.

(12)

TABLE OF CASES.

Miango v. Zaire, Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/194/1985, [to be published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

Montero v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 186.

Mpaka-Nsusu v. Zaire, Doc. A/41/40 p. 142.

Mpandanjila et al. v. Zaire, Doc. A/41/40 p. 121.

Muhonen v. Finland, Doc. A/40/40 p. 164.

Muteba v. Zaire, Doc. A/39/40 p. 162.

N. B. v. Sweden, Doc. A/40/40 p. 236.

N. S v. Canada, 1 S. D. 19.

Nieto v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 201.

Nunez v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 225.

O. E. V. S, 1 S. D. 5,6,35.

O. F. v. Norway, Doc. A/40/40 p. 204.

P. P. C. V. Netherlands, Doc. CCPR/C/32/D/212/1986, [to be

published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

Perdoma v. Uruguay, Doc. A/35/40 p. 111; 1`S. D. 45.

Peitraroia v. Uruguay, Doc. A/36/40 p. 153; 1 S. D. 76.

Penarrieta and Others v. Bolivia, Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/176/

1984, [to be published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

Pinkey v. Canada, Doc. A/37/40 p. 101; 1 S. D. 12,95.

Portorreal v. Dominican Republic, Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/188/

1984 [to be published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

Quinteros, E, v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 216.

Quinteros, M. C, v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 216.

R. T. Z. v. Netherlands, Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/254/1987, [to be

published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

Ramirez v. Uruguay, Doc. A/35/40 p. 121; 1 S. D. 3,49.

Romero v. Uruguay, Doc. A/39/40 p. 159.

Rubio v. Colombia, Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/161/1983, [to be

published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

S. H. B. v. Canada, Doc. A/42/40 p. 174.

S. R. V. France, Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/243/ý987, [to be published in Doc. A/43/40 (1988)].

S. S. v. Norway, 1 S. D. 30.

Scarrone v. Uruguay, Doc. A/39/40 p. 154.

Schweizer v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 117.

Sequeira v. Uruguay, Doc. A/35/40 p. 127; 1 S. D. 52.

Silva and Others v. Uruguay, Doc. A/36/40 p. 130; 1 S. D.

65.

Simones v. Uruguay, Doc. A/37/40 p. 174; 1 S. D. 130.

Solorzano v. Venezuela, Doc. A/41/40 p. 134.

Stalla Costa v. Uruguay, Doc. A/42/40 p. 170.

Touron v. Uruguay, Doc. A/36/40 p. 120; 1 S. D. 61.

V. 0. v. Norway, Doc. A/40/40 p. 232.

Valcada (Santullo) v. Uruguay, Doc. A/35/40 p. 107; 1 S. D.

43.

Van Duzen v. Canada, Doc. A/37/40 p. 150; 1 S. D. 118. Vasilskis v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 173.

(13)

TABLE OF CASES.

Waksman v. Uruguay, Doc. A/35/40 p. 120; 1 S. D. 9,36.

Weinberger Weisz v. Uruguay, Doc. A/36/40 p. 114; 1 S. D.

57.

Wight v. Madagascar, Doc. A/40/40 p. 171.

X. (a non-governmental organization) on behalf of S. G. F.

v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40 p. 245.

X. (a non-governmental organization) on behalf of J. F.

v. Uruguay, Doc. A/38/40.

Y. L. v. Canada, Doc. A/41/40 p. 145.

Z. Z.. v. Canada, 1 S. D. 19.

Zwaan-de Vries v. Netherlands, Doc. A/42/40 p. 160.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: Series A: Adolf v. Austria, vol. 49, (1984).

Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkeridales v. U. K., vol. 94,

(1985).

Airey v. Ireland, vol. 32, (1979).

Albert And Le Compte v. Belgium, vol. 58, (1983).

Artico v. Italy, vol. 37, (1980).

Axen v. FRG, vol. 72, (1983).

Baggetta v. Italy, vol. 119, (1987).

Barthold v. FRG, vol. 90, (1985).

Belgian Linguistics Case, vol. 6, (1968).

Belilos v. Switzerland, vol. 132, (1988).

Bentham v. Netherlands, vol. 97, (1985).

Bonisch v. Austria, vol. 92, (1985).

Boyle and Rice v. U. K., vol. 131, (1988).

Buchholz v. FRG, vol. 42, (1981).

Campbell and Cosans v. U. K., vol. 48, (1982).

Campbell and Fell v. U. K., vol. 80, (1984).

Colozza v. Italy, vol. 89, (1985).

Corigliano v. Italy, vol. 57, (1982).

De Cubber v. Belgium, vol. 86, (1984).

De Weer v. Belgium, vol. 35, (1980).

Delcourt v. Belgium, vol. 11, (1970).

Deumeland v. FRG, vol. 100, (1986).

Dudgeon v. U. K., vol. 45, (1981).

Ekbatani v. Sweden, (1988).

Engel v. Netherlands, vol. 22, (1976).

Erkner and Hofauer v. Austria, vol. 117, (1987).

Feldbrugge v. Netherlands, vol. 99, (1986). --

Glasenapp v. FRG, vol. 104, (1986)..

Goddi v. Italy, vol. 76, (1984).

Golder v. U. K., vol. 18, (1975).

Guincho v. Portugal, vol. 81, (1983).

H. v. Beigi. um, vol. 127, (1987).

Handyside v. U. K., vol. 24, (1976).

Ireland v. United Kingdom, vol. 25, (1978).

Konig v. FRG, vol. 27, (1978).

Kosiek v. FRG, vol. 105, (1986).

Lawless v. Ireland, vol. 3, (1961).

Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyerc v. Belgium, vol. 43,

(1981).

(14)

TABLE OF CASES.

Leudicke, Belkacem and Koc v. FRG, vol. 29, (1978).

Lingens v. Austria, vol. 103, (1986).

Lutz v. FRG, vol. 123, (1987).

Malone v. U. K., vol. 82, (1984).

Marcxx v. Belgium, vol. 31, (1979). Milasi v. Italy, vol. 119, (1987).

Minelli v. Switzerland, vol. 62, (1983).

Monnell and Morris v. U. K., vol. 115, (1987).

Muller and Others v. Switzerland, vol. 133, (1988). Nielsen v. Denmark, (1988).

Nolkenbockoff v. FRG, vol. 123, (1987).

Ozturk v. FRG, vol. 73, (1984).

Piersack v. Belgium, vol. 53, (1982).

Pretto v. Italy, vol. 71, (1983).

Rees v. U. K., vol. 106, (1986).

Silver v. U. K., vol. 61, (1983).

Sramek v. Austria, vol. 84, (1984), `

Sunday Times v. U. K., vol. 30, (1979).

Sutter v. Switzerland, vol. 74, (1984).

Tyrer v. U. K., vol. 26, (1978).

Van Oosterwijk v. Belgium, vol. 40, (1980).

W. v. U. K., vol. 121, (1987).

Weeks v. U. K., vol. 114, (1987).

Wemhoff v. FRG, vol. 7, (1968).

Winterwerp v. Netherlands, vol. 33, (1980).

Young, James And Webster v. U. K., vol. 44, (1981).

Zimmerman and Steiner v. Switzerland, vol. 66, (1984)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. A. 181/56, v. FRG, 1 YBECHR 139.

A. 214/56, De Becker v. Belgium, 2 YBECHR 214.

A. 235/56, 2 YBECHR 256.

A. 250/57, v. FRG, 1 YBECHR 222.

A. 343/57, Nielsen v. Denmark, admiss. decn., 2 YBECHR

412.

A. 343/57, Nielsen v. Denmark, 4 YBECHR 494.

A. 768/60, Receuil i, (1962).

A. 788/60, Pfunders v. Austria, 6 YBECHR 490.

A. 852/60, X v. FRG, 4 YBECHR 346.

A. 867/60, X v. Norway, 4 YBECHR 270.

A. 911/60, X v. Sweden, 4 YBECHR 198.

A. 1197/61, v. FRG, 5 YBECHR 88.

A. 1852/63, v. Austria, VIII YBECHR,. 273.

A. 2257/64, Soltikow v. FRG, 27 C. D. 1.

A. 2758/66, X v. Belgium, admiss. decn., 12. YBECHR 174.

A. 2991/66 and A. 2992/66, Alam, Khan and Singh V. U. K.,

10 YBECHR 478.

A. 3321-332 3/67,3344/67, The Greek Case, 12 YBECHR

(1969).

A. 3798/68, Church of Scientology v. U. K.,, 12 YBECH R 306.

A. 4311/69, X V. Dermark, 14 YBECHR 280.

A. 4340/69, Simon Herald v. Austria, admiss. decn., 14

YBECHR 352 .

A. 4430/70 and Others, East African Asians Cases V. U. K.,

13 YBECHR 928.

A. 4515/70, X and Association of Y v. U. K., 18 D. & R. 66.

(15)

TABLE OF CASES.

A. 5301/71, Ireland v. U. K., Report, (1978).

A. 5577-5583/72, Donnelly and Others v. U. K., 16 YBECHR

212.

A. 6040/73, X v. Ireland, admiss. decn. 16 YBECHR 388.

A. 6452/74, Saachi v. Italy, 5 D. & R. 43.

A. 6780/74 and 6950/75, Cyprus v. Turkey, 2 D. & R. 125

(1975).

A. 6959/75, Bruggemann and Scheuten v. FRG, 5 D. & R.

103.

A. 7138/75, X. v. Austria, 9 D. & R. 50.

A. 7154/75, Association X. v. U. K., 14 D. & R. 31.

A. 7341/76, Eggs v. Switzerland, 6 D. & R-176.

A. 7598/76, Kaplan v. U. K, 21 D. & R. 5 (1981).

A. 7805/77, X and Church of Scientology v. U. K., 16 D. &

R. 68.

A. 7994/77,14 D. & R. 238.

A. 8007/77, Cyprus V. Turkey, 13 D. & R. 85.

A. 8022/77, McVeigh et al. v. U. K., 25 D. &, R. - 15.

A. 8030/77,13 D. & R. 231, C. F. T. D. v. European Communities/ Their. Member States.

A. 8158/78, X v. U. K., 21 D. & R. 95.

A. 8244/78, Uppal and Others v. U. K., 3 EHRR 319.

A. 8416/79, X v. U. K., 19 D. & R. 244.

A. 8427/78, Hendriks v. Netherlands, 5 EHRR 223.

A. 8603/79,8722/79,8723/79,8729/79, Crociani and

Others v. Italy, 22 D. & R. 147.

A. 8710/79? Gay News Ltd., v. U. K., 5 EHRR 123.

A. 9013/90, Farrell v. U. K., 5 EHRR 465.

A. 9193/80, Marijnissen v. Netherlands, (March, 1984).

A. 9297/81, X. Assocation v. Sweden, 28 D. & R. 204.

A. 9345-9346/81, Dores and Silviera v. Portugal, (July,

1986).

A. 9360/81, v. Ireland, 32 C. D. 211.

A. 9471/81, X and X v. U. K., 7 EHRR 450.

A. 9659/82 and A. 9658/82, Boyle And Rice v. U. K. (May

1986).

A. 9825/82, v. U. K. and Ireland, 8 EHRR 49,

A. 9940-9944/82, Denmark, France, Netherlands, Norway and

Sweden v. Turkey, XXV ILM (1986) pp. 308-318.

A. 10038/82, Harman v. U. K., 7 E. H. R. R. 146. A. 10044/82, Stewart v. U. K., 7 EHRR 409.

A. 10243/83, Times Newspapers And Others V. U. K., 8 E. H. R. R. 54.

A. 10454/83, Gaskin v. U. K., 9 EHRR 279.

A. 10479/83, Kirkwood v. U. K., 6 EHRE? 373.

A. 10491/83, Angelini v. Sweden, 10 EHRR 123.

A. 10519/83, Salabiaku v. France, (July 19x7).

A. 10565/83, v. Germany, 7 EHRR 152.

A. 11170/84, B. v. Austria, admiss decn., (July 1987).

A. 11234/84, A. 11266/84 and A. 11386/85, Brogan, Coyle

McFadden and Tracey v. U. K., (14 May 1987).

A. 11454/85, v. Netherlands, 10 EHRR 145.

A. 11552/85,11553/85 and 11658/85 v. U. K.

A. 11714/85, v. U. K.

A. 12122/86, Lukka v. U. K., 9 EHRR 512.

A. 12244/86, A. 12245/86 and A. 12383/86 v. U. K., Council

(16)

TABLE OF CASES.

A. 12381/86,

v. U. K., 10 EHRR 158.

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

Advisory Opinion on "Other Treaties Subject To The

Advisory Jurisdiction Of The Court", 3 HRLJ (1982) 146.

Advisory Opinion On The Entry Into Force Of The American

Convention For A State Ratifying Or Adhering With A

Reservation, 3 HRLJ (1982) 153.

Advisory Opinion On Restrictions To The Death Penalty, 4 HRLJ (1983) 345.

Advisory opinion on Compulsory Membership In An

Association Prescribed By Law For The Practice Of

Journalism, 7 HRLJ (1986) pp. 74-106..

Advisory Opinion On Restrictions'. ' Of The Rights And Freedoms Of The American Convention - The Word 'Laws' In Article 30,7 HRLJ (1986) 231.

INTER AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS.

The Baby Boy Case, IACM, Case No. 2141, (United States),

2 HRLJ (1981) p. 110.

Roach and Pinkerton, IACM, Case No. 9647, (United

States), 8 HRLJ (1988) 145.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE.

Interhandel Case, (Switzerland v. United States), 1959 ICJ Rep. 6.

Jurisdiction Of The Courts Of Danzig (Danzig Railway

Officials) Case, PCIJ Ser. B. No. 15. (1928).

Reservations To The Convention On Genocide Case, ICJ Rep. (1951) p. 15.

Norweigan Loans Case, (France v. Norway), 1957 ICJ Rep. 9.

Nuclear Tests Cases, (Australia v. France), 1974 I. C. J. Rep. 253; (New Zealand v. France), 1974 I. C. J. Rep. 457.

South West Africa Cases, 1966 I. C. J. Rep. 6.

Case Concerning United States Diplomatic And Consular

Staff In Tehran, I. C. J. Rep (1980) p. 3.

Military And Paramilitary Activities In And Against

Nicaragua, (Nicaragua v. United States), Merits, 1986 I. C. J. Rep. 14.

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATIONS.

Ambatielos Arbitration, (Greece v. U. K. ), 12 R. I. A. A. 83 (1956).

Caire Claim, 5 R. I. A. A. 516 (1929).

Janes Claim, (U. S. v. Mexico), 4 R. I. A. A. 82 (1926). Noyes Claim, (U. S. v. Panama), 6 R. I. A. A. 308 (1933).

Quintanilla Claim, (Mexico v. U. S. ), 4 R. I. A. A. 101 (1926).

Salem Case, (Egypt v. U. S. ), 2 R. I. A. A. 1161 (1932).

Trail Smelter Arbitration, 3 R. I. A. A. 1905.

Turner Claim, (U. S. v. Mexico), 4 R. I. A. A. 278 (1927).

ENGLAND.

Albert v. Lavin, [1982] A. C. 546 (H. L. ).

Attorney-General v. Guardian Newspapers, [1987] 3 All ER

(17)

TABLE OF CASES.

Ex. p. Molyneaux, [1986] 1 W. L. R. 331.

Maclaine Watson and Co. Ltd. v. Department Of Trade And

Industry, T. L. R. 28th April 1988 (C. A. ).

In Re International Tin Council, T. L. R. 29th April 1988 (C. A. ).

Maclaine Watson & Co. v. International Tin Council,

T. L. R. 4th May 1988 (C. A. ).

Mootoo v. Attorney-General Of Trinidad and Tobago,

[1979] 1 WLR 1334.

Ministry Of Home Affairs And Another v. Fisher And

Another, [1980] A. C. 319.

R. v. Alladice, The Times, 11th May 1988 (C. A. ).

R. v. Samuel, [1988] 2 WLR 920.

R. v. Secretary Of State For The Home office,

ex. p. Chubb, (Q. B. D.

Riley and Others v.

1 A. C. 719.

Taylor v. Anderton,

The Bank Of Tokyo

unreported).

1 July 1986, unreported).

Attorney-General of Jamaica, [1983]

The Times, 21 Oct. 1986.

Ltd. v. Karoon, (QBD, 1 May 1986,

UNITED STATES.

Bounds v. Smith, (1977) S. Ct. 1491.

Bowers v. Hardwick, 106 S. Ct. 2841

Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F. 2d.

Johnson v. Transportation Agency Of

California, 55 U. S. Law Week 4379.

In The Matter of Quinlan, Supreme

70 NJ 10,355 A 2d 664 (1976).

(1986).

876 (1980)

Santa Clara County,

Court Of New Jersey,

McClesky v. Kemp, 95 L. Ed. 2d 262 (1987).

Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U. S. 319 (1927).

Regents Of The University Of California v. Bakke, 438

U. S. 265 (1978).

Roe v. Wade, 93 S. Ct. 705 (1973).

Thornburgh v. American College Of Obstetricians And

Gynecologists, Pennsylvania Section, 106 S. Ct. 2169

(1986).

CANADA.

Lubicon Lake Band et al. v. The Queen In Right Of Canada et al., 117 D. L. R. (3d) 247.

Re Mitchell and The Queen (1983) 42 O. R. (2d) 481;

Re Vincent And Minister of Employment and Immigration,

(1983) 148 DLR (3d) 385.

Borowski v. Attorney-General of Canada, (1983) DLR (4th)

112.

R. v. Morgentaler, Smoling and Scott, (1985) DLR (4th)

502.

Re Taylor et al. And Canadian Human Rights Commission,

37 DLR (4th) 577 (1987).

INDIA.

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, [1978] 1 S. C. C. 248.

Tellis And Others v. Bombay Municipal Corporation And Others, [1987] LRC (Const) 351.

(18)

TABLE OF CASES.

AUSTRALIA.

Lenanese Moslem Association and Others v. Minister For Immigration And Ethnic Affairs, 67 ALR (1986) (Fed. C. A. ).

NEW ZEALAND.

Broadcasting Corporation Of New Zealand v. Attorney-

General, (1982) 1 NZLR 120.

Department of Labour v. Latailakepa, (1982) 1 NZLR 632.

(19)

TABLE OF TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS.

TABLE OF TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL TNETRUMENTS. 1919 Covenant Of The League Of Nations.

1919 Constitution Of the International Labour

Organization.

1936 Convention Concerning The Use Of Broadcasting In The Cause Of Peace.

1945 Charter Of The United Nations.

1945 Statute Of The International Court Of Justice.

1946 Convetation On The Privileges And Immunities Of the

United Nations.

1948 Universal Declaration Of Human Rights.

1948 American Convention On The Rights And Duties Of . Man.

1950 Convention On the Prevention And Punishment Of-The Crime Of Genocide.

1950 European Convention On Human Rights.

1952 Convention On The International Right Of

Correction.

1957 Standard Minimum Rules For The Treatment Of

Prisoners.

1960 Declaration On the Granting of Independence To

Colonial Peoples And Countries. '

1961 European Social Charter.

1962 Resolution On Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources.

1965 International Convention On The Elimination Of All Forms Of Racial Discrimination.

1966 International Covenant On Civil And Political

Rights.

1966 Optional Protocol To The International Covenant On

Civil And Political Rights.

1966 International Covenant On Economic, Social And Cultural Rights.

1969 European Agreement Relating To Persons

Participating In Proceedings Of The European

Commission And Court Of Human'Rights.

1969 Vienna Convention On The Law Of Treaties.

1969 American Convention On Human Rights. '

1970 Declaration Of Principles. Of International Law

Concerning Friendly Relations And Cooperation Among States In Accordance With The'Charter'Of The United

Nations.

1973 Convention On The Prevention And Punishment Of The Crime Of Apartheid.

1974 Declaration On The Establishment Of A New International Economic Order. '

1974 Charter Of Economic Rights And Duties of States.

1974 Resolution On The Definition Of Aggression.

1975 Helsinki Declaration On Security And Cooperation

In Europe.

1975 Declaration On The Protection Of All Persons From

Being Subjected To Torture And Other Cruel, Inhuman

Or Degrading Treatment Or Punishment.

1979 Convention On The Elimination Of Discrimination Against Women.

(20)

TABLE OF TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS.

1979 Code Of Conduct For Law Enforcement Officials. 1981 African Charter Of Human And Peoples' Rights.

1982 Principles Of Medical Ethics Relevant To The Role Of Health Personnel, Particularly Physicians, In The Protection Of Prisoners And Detainees Against

Torture And Other Cruel, Inhuman Or Degrading Treatment Or Punishment.

1985 United Nations Convention Against Torture.

1986 Inter American Convention To Prevent And Punish Torture.

1986 Declaration On The Right To Development.

1987 European Convention For The Prevention And

Suppression Of Torture And Inhuman Or Degrading Treatment Or Punishment.

(21)

ABBREVIATIONS.

ABBREVIATIONS.

AJIL. American Journal Of International Law. A. F. D. I. Annual Francais De Droit International.

AFR. African Charter Of Human And Peoples

Rights.

Am. J. Comp. L. American Journal Of Comparative Law. AMR. American Convention On Human Rights.

Am. U. L. R. American University Law Review.

ASIL Proc. Proceedings Of The American Society Of International Law.

Australian YIL. Australian Yearbook Of International

Law.

BYIL. British Yearbook Of International Law. Bracton LJ. Bracton Law Journal.

Brit. JIS. British Journal Of International

Studies.

Boston Coll. ICLR. Boston College International And Comparative Law Review.

Brownlie. Principles of Public International Law.

Buff. L. R. Buffalo Law Review.

Bull GDR Committee. Bulletin of the German Democratic

Republic

Committee

For Human Rights.

Cal. West. ILJ. California Western International Law

Journal.

Can Bar Rev. Canadian Bar Review.

Can. HRYB. Canadian Human Rights Yearbook.

Can. YIL. Canadian Yearbook Of International Law.

C. D. Collection Of Decisions Of The European

Commission Of Human Rights.

CERD. Committee On The Elimination Of Racial Discrimination.

Ch. /ch. Chapter.

Col. LR. Colombia Law Review.

Col. H. R. L. R. Colombia Human Rights Law Review.

Col. J. Trans. L. Colombia Journal Of Transnational Law. Comm. L. B. Commonwealth Law Bulletin.

Corn. ILJ Cornell International Law Journal. Cmd. U. K. Command Papers.

CLR. Criminal Law Review.

C. L. P. Current Legal Problems.

D. & R. Decisions And Reports Of The European Commission Of Human Rights.

Denver JILP. Denver Journal Of International Law And

Politics.

Doc. Document.

Ed. /ed. Editor.

E. T. S. European Treaty Series.

ECHR. European Convention On Human Rights.

ECOSOC. Economic And Social Council..

EUCM. European Commission-Of Human Rights.

EUCT. European Court Of Human Rights.

Fawcett. The Application of the European

Convention On Human Rights.

GAOR. General Assembly Official Records.

GYIL. German Yearbook Of International Law.

(22)

ABBREVIATIONS.

Hofstra L. R. Hofstra Law Review.

Hous. JIL. Houston Journal Of International Law. HRC. Human Rights Committee.

HRCion. Human Rights Commission.

HRLJ. Human Rights Law Journal.

HRQ.

Human Rights

Quarterly.

HRRev. Human Rights Review.

IACM. Inter American Commission On Human

Rights.

ICCPR. International Covenant On Civil And

Political Rights.

ICESCR. International Covenant On Economic,

Social And Cultural Rights.

ICJ. International Court: Of Justice.

ICLQ. International And Comparative Law

Quarterly.

I. L. A. Report. International Law Association Report. ILM. International Legal Materials.

ILO. International Labour Organisation. Iowa LR Iowa Law Review.

Ind. JIL. Indian Journal Of International Law.

Ind. Y. W. A. Indian Yearbook Of World Affairs.

Int. Affairs. International Affairs.

Int. Conc. International Conciliation. Int. Org. International Organisation.

Int. Prob. International Problems.

ILR. International Law Reports.

Int. S. Q. International Studies Quarterly.

Isr. H. R. Y. Israeli Human Rights Yearbook.

Jap. Annual. IL. Japanese Annual Of International Law. J. Int. L. & Econ. Journal Of International Law And

Economics.

LQR. Law Quarterly Review.

Minn. LR. Minnesota Law Review.

MLR. Modern Law Review.

NILR. Netherlands International Law Review. NYUJILP. New York University Journal Of

International Law And Politwcs.

NYLSLR. New York Law School Law Review.

p. /pp. Page(s).

pr. /prs. Paragraph(s).

P. L. Public Law.

PSQ. Political Science Quarterly.

R. I. A. A. United Nations Reports Of International

Arbitral Awards.

R. I. D. P. Revue De Institut De Droit Penal.

Rec Des Cours. Recueil Des Cours De L'Academie De Droit

International.

RDH/HRJ. Revue Des Droits De L'homme/ human

Rights Journal.

Rev. ICJ. Review Of The International Commission Of Jurists.

Rev. Int. Stud. Review Of International Studies.

SR. Summary Record.

Santa Clara LR. Santa Clara Law Review.

1 S. D. Human Rights Committee: Selected

(23)

ABBREVIATIONS.

South African YIL. South African Yearbook Of

International Law.

Temple. LQ. Temple Law Quarterly.

Tex. ILJ. Texas International Law Journal.

UDHR. Universal Declaration Of Human Rights. U. K. T. S. U. K. Treaty Series.

UNESCO. United Nations Education, Scientific And

Cultural Organisation.

U. Pa. LR. University Of Pennsylvania Law Review.

Univ. H. R. Universal Human Rights.

Univ. NSWLJ. University Of New South Wales Law Review.

Univ. Tor. L. J. University Of Toronto Law Journal.

Univ. Il1. L. F. University Of Illinois Law Forum.

U. N. T. S. United Nations Treaty Series.

Va. JIL. Virginia Journal Cf International Law.

Vand. J. Trans. L. Vanderbilt Journal Of Transnational Law.

Van Dijk And Van Dijk And Van Hoof, Theory And

Van Hoof. Practice Of The European Convention On

Human Rights.

Vill. LR. Villanova Law Review. Wayne LR. Wayne Law Review.

WHO. World Health Organisation.

Will. & Mary LR. William And Mary Law Review. Wisc. L. R. Wisconsin Law Review.

Yale J. W. P. O. Yale Journal Of World Public Order.

Y. B. W. A. Yearbook Of World Affairs.

Y. E. L. Yearbook Of European Law. Z. A. O. R. V. Zeitschrift Fur Auslandisches

(24)

STATES PARTIES.

STATES PARTIES TO THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS.

87 States Parties: (As of 8 April 1988).

Afghanistan, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Barbados,

Belgium, Bolivia, Bulgaria, Byelorussian SSR, Cameroon,

Canada, Central African Republic, Chile, Colombia,

Congo, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Czechoslavakia, Democratic

Peoples's Republic Of Korea, Democratic Yemen, Denmark,

Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador,

Equatorial Guinea, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia,

German Democratic Republic, Germany/ Fed Republic,

Guinea, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Iran, Iraq,

Italy, Jamaica,: Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Libyan

Arab Jamahiraya, Luxembourg, Madagascar, 'Mali,

Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Netherlands, New

Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Norway, Panama, Philippines,

Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Vincent

and the Grenadines, San Marino, Senegal, Spain, Sri

Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic,

Tanzania, Togo, Trinidad & Tobago, Tunisia, Ukrainian

SSR, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United

Kingdom, Uruguay, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Zaire,

Zambia.

(25)

INTRODUCTION.

INTRODUCTION.

According to Louis Henkin "Human rights is the idea

of our time". In concrete terms the "idea" of human

rights is given expression through a myriad of regional

and global international instruments. The most general

of -those instruments, the 'Universal Declaration Of

Human Rights' (1948), the 'International Covenant On

Civil And Political Rights' (1966), the 'Optional

Protocol' thereto (1966), and the 'International

Covenant On Economic, Social And Cultural Rights'

(1966), collectively form the "International Bill Of

Rights". The two Covenants and the Optional Protocol

entered into force in 1976.

Under the terms of the International Covenant On

Civil And Political Rights a "Human Rights Committee"

was established in 1977 with certain functions in

respect of the Covenant and the Optional Protocol

thereto. This thesis examines the work of the Human

Rights Committee. Through that examination it is

possible to determine and evaluate the nature of the

Human Rights Committee and assess its contribution to

the development of the "idea of our time".,

Chapter One and the opening section'". df Chapter Four

provide brief accounts of the origins, drafting, and

significance in international law, of the Covenant and

the Optional Protocol thereto. S. knowledge of these

matters is a necessary precondition to a proper

(26)

INTRODUCTION.

Chapter Two analyses the institutional nature of

the Human Rights Committee. The aim-is to determine what

kind of a body the Human Rights Committee is.

Chapters Three and Four provide a full examination

of the practices and procedures under the two functions

exercised by the Human Rights Committee to date. These

are the reporting system provided for in article 40

ofthe Covenant and the individual communications system

provided for in the Optional Protocol. Each Chapter

offers an appraisal of the development of the respective

systems to date.

To obtain a more specific insight into the work of

the Human Rights Committee the thesis proceeds with the

examination of its work under the two implementation

systems in respect of selected rights in the Covenant.

Initially it was hoped to consider each of the articles

on which the Human Rights Committee had seen fit to

express a "General Comment",, under article 40 (4) of the

Covenant. In the event that proved to be impossible.

However, each of the articles examined have been the

subject of a "General Comment" by the Human Rights

Committee and this may perhaps be taken as some

reflection of their relative importance in the view of

the Human Rights Committee. In any event it is submitted

that the articles chosen are self evidently important.

Chapter Five considers the article 1

(self-determination). Chapter Six considers article 2

(general obligations to respect and ensure the rights in

(27)

INTRODUCTION.

remedy in the event of violation). Chapter Seven considers article 4 (derogation provision). Chapter Eight considers article 6 (right to life). Chapter Nine

considers article 7 (torture and other prohibited

treatment and punishment), and, in part, article 10 (treatment of persons deprived of their liberty).

Chapter Ten considers article 14 (Fair Trial). Chapter

Eleven considers article 19 (freedom of opinion and expression). Chapter Twelve considers article 20 (war propaganda and advocacy of national, racial or religious

hatred). Each of Chapters Five to Twelve concludes with a general appraisal which links the consideration of the respective articles to the general themes of the nature

of the Human Rights Committee and the development of the Covenant and the Protocol. For the sake of completeness I have appended the texts of the two

"General Comments" of the Human Rights Committee to date which are not considered in lull in this thesis

(Appendix IV). These concern the position of aliens under the Covenant and the right to privacy in article

17 of the Covenant.

Chapter Thirteen provides a general appraisal of

the work )f the Human Rights Committee in giving life to

the structures and mechanisms of the Covenant and the

(28)

CH. 1.

CHAPTER 1.

1

THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS AND THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL THERETO. I

1

This account is mainly drawn from the following

United Nations records. The Reports, of the Human Rights Commission, 1947-1954: 1st session, U. N. Doc. E/259,

ECOSOC, O. R., fourth session, Supp. 3, (1947); 2nd session, U. N. Doc. E/600, ESCOR, O. R., sixth session,

Supp. l, (1948); 3rd session, U. N. Doc. E/800, ECOSOC, O. R., seventh session, Supp. 2, (1948); 5th session,

U. N. Doc. E/1371, ECOSOC, O. R., ninth session, Supp. 10, (1949); 6th session, U. N. Doc. E/1681, ECOSOC, O. R., eleventh session, Supp. 5, (1950); 7th " session,

U. N. Doc. E/1992, ECOSOC, O. R., thirteenth session,

Supp. 9, (1951); 8th session, U. N. Doc. E/2256, ECOSOC O. R., fourteenth session, Supp. 4, (1952); 9th session,

U. N. Doc. E/2447, ECOSOC, O. R., sixteenth session,

Supp. 8, (1953); 10th session, U. N. Doc. E/2573, ECOSOC, O. R., eighteenth session, Supp. 7, (1954). An excellent

annotation of the work of the HECion can be found at U. N. Doc. A/2929,10 GAOR, Annexes, Agenda Item 28, Part

II, (1955).

From 1954 to 1966 the draft Covenants were

considered by the Third Committee of the General

Assembly. For its Reports see the following

U. N. Documents:

A/2808 and Corr. 1,9 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 58, part

1, (1954);

A/2907,10 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 28, part. I, (1955);

A/3077,10 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 28, part I, (1955);

A/3525,11 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 31, (1956);

A/3764, and Corr. 1,12 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 33, (1957);

A/4045,13 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 32, (1958);

A/4299,14 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 34, (1959);

A/4625,15 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 34, (1960-61);

A/5000,16 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 35, (1961-62);

A/5365,17 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 43, (1962);

A/5655,18 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 48, (1963), which is

accompanied by A/5411, a Report of the Secretary-General

updating A/2929 above; A/6173,20 GAOR, Annexes,

Ag. Item. 65, (1966); A/6546,21 GAOR, Annexes, Ag. Item. 62,

(1966).

There is an extensive literature dealing with the

matters dealt with in this chapter. See H. O. Agarwal,

Implementation Of The Human Rights Covenants With

Special Reference To India, (1983); A. Cassese,

International Law In A Divided World, ch. 11, (1986);

R. Chakravarti, Human Rights and the United Nations,

(1958); R. Cohen, International Ccvenant on Civil and

political Rights, 6 International Problem o, pp. 38-49,

(29)

CH. 1.2

(Footnote Continued)

(1968); A. L. Del Russo, International Protection of Human Rights, chs. I-III, (1970); P. N. Drost, Human Rights As Legal Rights-The Realization of Human Rights In Positive

International Law, (New York, 1951, Leiden, 1965); G. Ezejiofor, Protection of Human Rights-under the law, chs. 2-3, (1964); T. J. Farer, The United Nations And Human Rights: More Than A Whimper Less, Than A Roar, 9 HRQ

(1987) pp. 550-585; D. P. Forsythe, The United Nations and Human Rights, 100 Pol. S. Q., pp. 249-269, (1985); M. Ganji,

International Protection Of Human Rights, (1964); J. F. Green, The United Nations and Human Rights,. chs. 1-3,

(1956); W. P. Gormley, The Implementation Of United Nations Human Rights Covenants: Contemporary Legal

Precedent And Future Procedural Remedies, 3 Vols, Ph. D. thesis, (Manchester, 1972); W. Korey, The Key To Human Rights-Implementation, 570 International Conciliation,

pp. 5-70, (Nov., 1968); L. Henkin, ' Introduction, to L. Henkin (ed. ), The International Bill Of Rights - The Covenant On Civil And Political Rights, (1981);

J. P. Humphrey, Human Rights and the United Nation -A

Great Adventure, (1984); Fareed Nabiel Jamiel, The United Nations Commission On Human Rights And Its Work For Human Rights And Fundamental Freedoms, chs. 1 and 3,

(1979); F. Jhabvala, The Practice Of The Covenants' Human Rights Committee 1976-82: Review Of State Party Reports,

6 HRQ (1984), p. 81 at pp. 81-95; H. Lauterpacht,

International Law and Human Rights, Part II, (1950); H. Lauterpacht, The International Protection Of The

Individual, in E. Lauterpacht, ed., H. Lauterpacht,

International Law-Collected Papers, Vol. 3, The Law Of Peace, pp. 407-430, (1977); M. Lippman, Human Rights

Revisited - The Protection Of Human Rights Under The ICCPR, 26 NILR (1979) PP. 221-277; E. Luard (ed. ), The International Protection of Human Rights, chs. 1-4,

(1967); M. S. McDougal and G. Bebr, Human Rights In The United Nations, 58 AJIL (1964), pp. 603-641; M. Moscowitz,

Human Rights and World Order-The Strugggle For Human Rights, (1958); M. Moscowitz, The Politics and Dynamics

of Human Rights, (1968); M. Moscowitz, International

Concern with Human Rights, ch. 1, (1974); M. Neal, The United Nations and Human Rights, 489 International

Conciliation, pp. 111-174, (March, 1953); V. Pechota, The Development of the Covenant on Civil and Political

Rights, i: i Henkin (ed. ), The International Bill Of Rights - The ICCPR, above, ch. 2, (1981); A. H. Robertson,

Human Rights in the World, ch. 2, (1982); P. Sieghart, The International Law of Human Rights, chs. 1 and 2, (1983);

J. Simarsian, periodic notes on the drafting at 42 AJIL (1948), pp. 879-883,43 AJIL (1949), pp. 779-786; 45 AJIL

References

Related documents

Confidential Information : Each party agrees that information concerning the other party’s business (including that of all corporate affiliates and subcontractors) is

There may, for instance, be supernumerary rings of strong cilia as in Spionidae and Chaetopteridae, sometimes on many segments, and there are frequently very long provisional

The Russian Analytical Digest is a bi-weekly internet publication jointly produced by the Research Centre for East European Studies [Forschungsstelle Osteuropa] at the University

Furthermore, low income earners reported health problems more frequently in 2011 than at the onset of the crisis (Figure 1), the very group that can be expected to experience

Leaning towards designing a system that ensures high capacity or robustness and security of embedded data has led to great diversity in the existing

Nonetheless, when engaging in further website development, these entities (firms or government agencies) usually present content features used for other purposes such as

Bijnens & Konings (2017) described the significant shift in the structure of the Belgian firm landscape throughout the previous decades: jobs flow from the

Based on study objectives highlighted, the WSS was used to examine the impact of safety culture on the safety behavior based on the perceptions of army