• No results found

Export Survival and Comparative Advantage

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Export Survival and Comparative Advantage"

Copied!
18
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Export Survival and Comparative Advantage

Regional Seminar on Export Diversification, October 27-28, 2010

Bolormaa Tumurchudur, UNCTAD Miho Shirotori, UNCTAD

Alessandro Nicita, UNCTAD

(Work in progress)

(2)

Overview

„ Export growth can be boosted

‰

By exporting more of existing products (at the intensive margin)

‰

By exporting more new products (at the extensive margin)

‰

By fewer failures of exports (at the sustainability margin)

„ Extensive margin growth is more important than intensive margin growth

‰

Hummels & Klenow (2005), Pham & Martin (2007), Brenton & Newfarmer (2007, 2009)

„ Durations of export relations are very low: median export spell length is one to two years

‰

Besedes & Prusa (2006), Nitsch (2007)

„ Therefore the key element to achieving higher export growth are longer bilateral trade-relationships and higher survival rates of those.

‰

However product churning is necessary to select core products

„ It is important for the design of export-promotion policies to search for

robust and policy related determinants of export survival.

(3)

Research question

„ What is the role of comparative

advantage in Export Duration?

(4)

Outline

„ Overview

„ Literature on Export Survival Determinants

„ How to define the product with Comparative Advantage?

„ Export duration: Prima-facie evidence

„ Survival Analysis

„ Results: Stratified Cox PH Model estimation

„ Conclusion

(5)

Empirical Studies on Export Survival

„ Seminal work of Besedes & Prusa (2006a)

„ Nitsch (2009)

‰ - using 10 year panel of German Imports he found that gravity variables influenced the duration of trade flows

„ Fugazza & Molina (2009)

‰ extended the panel of bilateral flows between 96 countries using, as regressors, gravity variables and time required for export procedures as proxies for fixed costs.

„ Obashi (2009)

‰ found that vertical relationships have lower hazard rates than the exports of final goods and that they are less sensitive to trade costs

„ Growing number of papers have used firm-level datasets :

‰ Gorg et al. (2008) have found that longer survival for products located close to the firm’s core competencies and to the country’s comparative advantage by using Hungarian firm level data,

‰ Carballo & Volpe (2008) studied how diversification strategies affect survival of firm

level activity by using Peruvian firm level data.

(6)

Role of Comparative advantage in Export Survival:

How to define the product with comparative advantage?

„ Identify comparative advantage of a product is one way of providing guidance of supporting a particular sector (pick winners)

„ However as the traditional measure Balassa’s RCA index defines country’s current trade pattern, it cannot be used

„ UNCTAD developed an alternative approach by building a recent database on Revealed Factor Intensity Indices at the Product

Level. It extended the PRODY index developed by Hausman,

Hwank and Rodrik (2005) to Revealed Factor Intensities.

(7)

Revealed Factor Intensity Indices

„ Methodology inspired by Hausmann, Hwang &

Rodrik (2007)

„ RFII for each traded good is calculated as a weighted average of the factor

abundance of the countries exporting that good.

„ Weights are a variant of Balassa’s RCA indices

= k i i

k t e

RFII ( ) ω

{ i i i }

i k h l

e ⇒ , ,

( / / )

i i

i k

k i i

i k

X X X X ω =

(8)

Distance to Comparative Advantage

„ Eucleadean distance between the vector of the country’s endowments and the vector of the product revealed factor intensity

„ We standardized the absolute differences between the product factor intensities and the country’s factor endowments to have zero mean and unit variance.

2 2

2 ( ˆ ) ( ˆ )

ˆ )

( c k c k c k

ck std k k std h h std l l

D = − + − + −

c c

c h l

k , , - country’s human capital, capital and land endowments

- revealed factor intensities of product k

k k

k h l

k ˆ , ˆ , ˆ

(9)

Export duration: Prima-facie evidence

01020304050Percent

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Export duration, in years

Whole sample 23'417'160 17% 7'819'052 2

Northern countries 15'323'754 16% 4'785'047 2 Developing Countries 7'906'207 19% 2'932'031 2

LDCs 187'199 35% 101'974 1

DCs and LDCs by regions

Africa 1'003'121 25% 434'223 1

Americas 1'955'757 23% 766'385 1

Asia 5'134'528 18% 1'833'397 2

Asian by region

Eastern Asia 1'741'382 13% 543'764 2

Pacific Asia 22'379 32% 11'199 1

South Asia 1'008'432 21% 394'696 1

Southeast Asia 1'737'659 20% 649'231 2

Western Asia 624'676 19% 234'507 2

Median duration time at risk Incidence

rate

No. Of subjects

Distribution of Export duration, uncensored observations

(10)

Export duration and Comparative advantage: Prima-facie evidence

VENBRBMLTMLTVEN BRBVEN

IRQ

CYPSLE IRQMLTTTO BRB IRN

BRB BRBTTO

MLTBHR MLTCYPPRT

ISRSENJAM JORNOR CYP MLT

IRL ISR DOM MYS CRI

TUR CYPDOM

IRNBRBISL MLTMEX

JAM JOR VENKOR

CYPCRI ISLNOR MEX

ISL JORFIN

IRL IRLMYS VEN

SLE VEN

JOR MLT MEXIRLPOLHUN

JORDZAGRCFINTTO IRQ

CRIBRA IRNGRC CYP

ISR

ISR

MLI POL HUN

PRT ISR VEN

ISRTHA PRT TTO

MEX TTO POL

PHL VENIRLISL

PHLCOL SLE CHL MYS FINIDN IRL

DZA JAMTHA HUN

NOR TUR

JORSWE ISR GRC TTO

DZA IRL

ISLKOR MLIJAM

TURPANIDNEGY JPN IRN

ECU KOR

HUN NOR

TUR

JAM MEX

ECU EGY FIN

MEX BRA POL

BRASLV GRC

SGP ISL

PRT POL

CHN ZAF

DNKCOL FIN KOR

PRT NORKOR

GRCCHE DNKDOM GRC IRNESP

DZA BRBISL

TTO

IRQ COL MYSPAN MEX

PAN KOR

JPN HUN

CYP BRA

NER TUR ISR IRN

SWE

SGP FIN

FJI PHLAUT NOR

SLE KOR

EGY IRL

DZA CHL

HUN JOR BRA

SWE TUR CHL MEX

NORJPNDNKSGP

IRQ ECU DNK

PAN CAN POL

BHR TUN CHLBHRCHESLV

ESP

CAN BHR

SWE

BHR FIN

POL DNK

GRC

BRB BRA

CYPAUT CRITHA IND ZAFNZL

NZLSWE CAN PAN NZL

ESP ZAF

IND MYS

ESPCRI AUT

URYPHL COL

JAM AUT CRI

DOM CRI

COL

HUN CHL

KOR

NZL PRT

CHN ARG

POL

TUN CAN

CHL SWE

DZA BRAPRT JPN CANGRC

ZAF ESP SWE DNK CAN

TUN DZA IRQ

ZAF TUR

IDN DNK

NLD MYS

ECU ARG

ESP HUNAUT

HND COLESP JPN

PAN

COL ZAF FIN

GBR NLD PRT CHE

SYR PER ITATHA ZAF

AUT JPN

URY AUT

TUR

DNK

MUS CHLIDN NOR

TTOSLV PAN URY SYR

THA FRA CHN

ARG THA

JOR IND ITA

TUN CAN

CHE

ZAFSGP

DOM MYS

CHE JPN

ITA

CHECHN

ZWE ARG

JPN BHR NLD

EGY TGO CHL

TUN CHN

ARG AUS

CHE ESP

SGP SLE IND BRA

IRN PHL ISL MYS

DZA CHN

AUS NZL

FRA

NICGBR ARG

SGP SWE

NZL EGY GBR

AUSNZL

GTMHND AUS

FRA

URYDEU SLV SGP NZL AUS GBR

DOM

SLE CRI

IDN NLD

RWA SEN NER

ITA NLDTUN

BHR CHN

BHR SLV CHE

ITA

DEU EGY DEU

FRASEN PAN CAN

HND URY

NLD

URY NLD

IDN

GBREGY ZWE IND

FJIGTMNIC DEU

URYPHL CHN

ECU ITA

KENSEN SGPINDCOL GBR ARG

AUT

FJI GBR FRA

NER PERHND URY

GTM ITA

PHL

AUS

PER FRA

NER KEN USA

NIC FRA ARG

FRA USA

NICZWE FJI SYR IND

MLI NLD USA

MUS ITA

CMR GTMSYR DEU

KEN FJI USA

HND KEN GTM THA

KEN IRN

JAM DEU

UGA DEU

TUN

IRQ THA

USA SLV

LBR SYRECU NIC

ECU

ZMB GBR

GTM IND

CMRRWA SEN AUSDEU

PER

RWA SLV

CMRGHA TUN AUS

NICRWAGHA ECU

CAF TGO MOZ SLV

GTM PHL USA

IDN

SYR SEN GTM

CMRGMB MUS USA

MUSLKATGO UGA ZWE RWA MLI LBR

GHA ZWE

JAM PAK KEN

SLE PRY RWACAF

LKA PER

HND UGAMUS USA

IDN

PER

ZWE ZAR

KENFJI PER

EGY

PER

BOL KENDOMPAK

MUS HND PNG

TGO LBR ZMB

HND

UGA GMB ZMBPAK PRYBOL BOL NIC

RWA LKA

GMB BOLGHABOL LBR BEN

ZAR DOM

BEN SYR PRYMOZ

ZMB ZWE

ZARGMBMWI SYR

BEN PAK NIC

UGATGO ZAR

LKA

MLINPL LBR LKAFJI

COG MOZ

LBR CMRSLEMLI NPL

COG BOL

CAF PRY

LKA

GMB ZWE

ZMBSDN PAK

LBR TGOCMRPRYCOG MUS

PRY BENCOG PAK

MOZ MOZ

CAF UGAGHANPL PRY

ZMB PNGCOG

BEN GMB LKA

SDN MUS

UGACOGBGD MWI PAK

CAF BOL

RWA NPL BENPNG

NPL BOL

PNG ZMB IRQ

GHAGHANPL

CAFMWI FJI

NER SDN BGDBGD SEN

SDN

BGD

ZAR PNGMWI

MWI PRYTGOCOG

LKA

NER GMB

PNGGMB NER

PAK

PNG COG BEN BGD PNG

NPL

ZAR CMRMLI MOZ

NPL

BGD ZMB

CMR

CAF NER

MLI MOZ

LBR GHA

BEN

MWIZARMOZ MWI

BGD BGD

SEN

SDN MWI

ZAR CAFSDN

UGA SDN

TGO SDN

02468Average duration

1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

Average distance

(mean) spell_lengh Fitted values

ARG

AUS AUT

BEN BGD

BHR BOL

BRA

BRB

CAF CAN

CHE

CHL CHN

CMR COG

COL

CRI

CYP DEU

DNK

DOM DZA

ECUEGY ESP

FIN

FJI FRA

GBR

GHA

GMB GRC

GTM

HND HUN

INDIDN IRL

IRN

IRQ ISL ISR

ITA

JOR JAM JPN

KEN KOR

LBR

LKA MEX

MLI MLT

MOZ MUS

MWI MYS

NER NIC

NLD

NOR

NPL

NZL PAK

PAN

PER PHL

PNG POL

PRT

PRY

RWA

SEN SDN SGP

SLE SLV SWE

SYR

TGO THA

TTO

TUN TUR

UGA URY

USA

VEN ZAF

ZMB ZAR ZWE

0 2 4 6 8 A v e rag e du rat io n, 1 99 4

1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

Average distance, 1994

(mean) spell_lengh Fitted values

(11)

Survival Analysis: Introduction

„ Allows us to focus on the long-term sustainability of trade relationships

‰

Export duration represents the number of years during which country c exports k products to its partners

„ Allows us to deal with non negative survival times and their skewed distributions

„ Allows us to deal with censored observations

Start of study, 1993 End of study, 2003

censored

censored

(12)

Survival Analysis

„ Non parametric: Kaplan Meier Survival Estimation

„ Semi-parametric: Cox Proportional Hazard Model

„ Database

‰ on bilateral trade flows from 1993-2003

‰ 93 exporters (26 North countries, 49 DCs and 18 LDCs)

‰ Distance to comparative advantage (UNCTAD data on Revealed Factor Intensity Indices at the HS 6 digit level)

Examine the relationship between survival times distribution and some

covariates of interest.

(13)

Non-parametric Analysis: Kaplan Meier

The probability that a trade relationship will survive longer than time t.

∏ ≤ ⎟ ⎟

⎜ ⎜

⎛ −

=

t

t j

j j

j n

d t n

S ) ˆ (

0.000.250.500.751.00

0 2 4 6 8 10

analysis time

High distance Low distance

Kaplan-Meier survival estimates

0.000.250.500.751.00

0 2 4 6 8 10

analysis time

DCs LDCs

North

Kaplan-Meier survival estimates

(14)

Semi-parametric Cox Proportional Hazard Model

The Cox Proportional Hazard regression model is given by )

...

exp(

)

( t X 1 1 X p p

h X t

h = β + + β

• The predictors, X ,... 1 X p are assumed to act additively on log h t x .

• log h t x changes linearly with the β s.

• The effect of the predictors is the same at all times t.

• Makes no assumption about the form of h (t )

The Stratified Cox Model allows the form of the underlying hazard function to vary across levels of stratification variables.

C j

X t

h j Z X t

h , = = j ( ) exp( β ), = 1 ,... (number of levels in Z)

(15)

Estimation results: Comparative Advantage

Stratified Cox Proportional Hazard estimation

All Northern

Countries DCs LDCs Asia

Initial export (log) 0.964*** 0.972*** 0.948*** 0.952*** 0.945***

(-9.14) (-7.53) (-9.11) (-4.45) (-6.37)

Distance (log) 1.093*** 1.091*** 1.087*** 1.175*** 1.062***

(14.49) (12.19) (6.61) (4.57) (3.69) Market Diversification (log) 0.271*** 0.230*** 0.318*** 0.526*** 0.260***

(-14.94) (-10.52) (-11.17) (-5.13) (-10.73) Product Diversification (log) 0.293*** 0.388*** 0.199*** 0.568*** 0.182***

(-9.11) (-5.09) (-10.47) (-3.29) (-9.22)

Observations 7,819,052 4,785,047 2,932,031 101,974 1,833,397

Robust z statistics in parentheses

* significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%

Fixed effects are controlled by stratifying at exporter, importer and product Clustered by reporter

227 . 0 1 227 . 1 1 093

. 1

1 ( 10 )

) 10

ln( − = Ln − = − =

β

(16)

Estimation results: Export Diversification

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5

Initial export (log) 0.962*** 0.964*** 0.964*** 0.966*** 0.964***

(-8.48) (-9.14) (-9.18) (-8.49) (-9.18)

Distance (log) 1.161*** 1.093*** 1.046 1.067 1.046

(23.62) (14.49) (0.9) (1.35) (0.9)

Market Diversification (log) 0.271*** 0.269*** 0.266*** 0.269***

(-14.94) (-14.97) (-14.81) (-14.97)

Product Diversification (log) 0.293*** 0.294*** 0.291*** 0.294***

(-9.11) (-9.11) (-8.99) (-9.11)

Distance (log)*Market Diversification(log) 1.067*** 1.069*** 1.067***

(10.53) (10.71) (10.53)

Distance(log)*Product Diversification(log) 0.979*** 0.976*** 0.979***

(-3.41) (-4.25) (-3.41) Stratified by

Exporter yes yes yes yes yes

Importer yes yes yes yes yes

Product (HS 6 digit) yes yes yes yes yes

Clustered

Exporter yes yes yes yes yes

Importer

Observations 7'819'052 7'819'052 7'819'052 7'045'032 2'527'787

Robust z statistics in parentheses

* significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%

Stratified Cox Proportional Hazard estimation

(17)

Conclusions

„ Median export duration is 2 years for the whole sample (7’819’052 obs)

„ Initially large exports will have longer duration

„ Robust negative relationship between the distance to comparative advantage and the export survival.

„ Further robustness check using Parametric Survival

(Duration) Models

(18)

Thank you very much

References

Related documents

Data collected during the initial phase of the CARES program (2005–2010) have helped participating communities identify opportunities to improve care for persons who experience an

The Asian Legal Resource Centre noted 119 cases of dowry-related violence, including 78 deaths in the first half of 2009, yet an Amnesty International report disclosed that

There are a number of different kinds of windows in Blackboard Collaborate Web Conferencing: the main application window, module windows (such as the Notes window and the

In meditation and in the meditative states communication, communion to and from our soul forces can be easily filtered through the various levels of our consciousness.. It must

1 Principal components analysis (PCA) (Fig. 1a ) and unsupervised hierarchical clustering (Fig. 1b ) of the 308 exons (292 genes) with differential exon usage among

Af- ter accurately replicating the observed velocity response to large calving events in 2010 and 2012, we were confident in the model’s ability to estimate the instantaneous

The bash script shown in Figure 1 was created to automate the process of creating a daily list of installed packages and system backup... Bash script for the daily listing of

CONCLUSIONS After initial surgical lavage for septic arthritis, 2 weeks of targeted antibiotic therapy is not inferior to 4 weeks regarding cure rate, adverse events or sequelae