L’ENEA e la ricerca di sistema elettrico:
il fotovoltaico innovativo
UNIVERSITA’ NAPOLI FEDERICO II
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dei Materiali e della
Produzione
Sviluppo di ossidi trasparenti e conduttivi
mediante processo Sol-Gel
Thin film silicon solar cells
The front TCO layer influences
the performances of the device
Glass Glass ≈≈0.7mm0.7mm TCO TCO ≈≈0.5 0.5 µµmm p paa--SiSi≈≈10 10 nmnm i a i a--SiSi0.50.5µµmm + + ++ ++ + + ++ ++ ++ -- -- -- -- -- - -E E n naa--SiSi≈≈15 15 nmnm Metal
Metal ContactContact
Glass Glass ≈≈0.7mm0.7mm Glass Glass ≈≈0.7mm0.7mm TCO TCO TCO ≈≈0.5 0.5 µµmm TCO ≈≈0.5 0.5 µµmm p paa--SiSi≈≈10 10 nmnm p paa--SiSi≈≈10 10 nmnm i a i a--SiSi0.50.5µµmm + + ++ ++ + + ++ ++ ++ -- -- -- -- -- - -E E i a i a--SiSi0.50.5µµmm + + ++ ++ + + ++ ++ ++ -- -- -- -- -- - -E E n nnaa--SiSi≈≈15 15 nmnm naa--SiSi≈≈15 15 nmnm Metal
MetalMetal ContactContact
Metal ContactContact
Until now, In
2
O
3
:Sn (ITO) and SnO
2
:F were widely used
as front electrode thanks to their low resistivity.
However, indium is somewhat rare and really expensive,
while tin oxide shows low stability to the high
temperature. So, recently, doped zinc oxide (ZnO) has
been considered ideal alternative materials due to their
lower cost and wide availability.
ZnO via Sol-Gel
Low temperature process
Easy obtainment of films
Advantages:
High control of purity, composition and
microstructure of final product
Uniformity on large area (Dip-coating)
Low equipment cost
High Stoichiometry of ZnO
Drawbacks:
Difficulty to obtain films of suitable thickness
by a single dipping step
molecular precursors
solvent
hydrolysis polycond.wet gel
solvent
evaporation
solvent
extraction
aerogel
solvent
ev
apo
rat
ion
hydrolysis
po
ly
cond.
thin film xerogel
Sol-Gel technology
heat
heat
xerogel
ceramic
ceramic thin film
in acidic conditions (pH < 6), Zn
2+
(aq)
in neutral to slightly basic conditions, Zn(OH)
2(s)
in basic conditions (pH>12), Zn(OH)
4
2-(aq)
Main equilibria into aqueous solution of Zn
2+
2
(
)
2
(
)
(
)
(
)
2
2(
)
(
)
6
2(
)
2( )
2
-17
2( )
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
K=10
(
)
2
Kps=3.5 10
aq
aq
aq
aq
aq
aq
aq
s
s
aq
aq
Zn
H O
Zn OH
H
Zn OH
H O
Zn OH
H
Zn OH
Zn OH
Zn OH
Zn
OH
+
+
+
+
+
+
−
+
+
+
+
+
×
precursor
[Zn
2+] (M)
hydrolysis
solvent
deposition
film thickness for 1 step
(nm)
EtOH abs 2-MeEtOH EtOH abs 2-MeEtOH i-PrOHZA anhy 0.3-1.3 stirring at 50°C for 60 min followed by filtration i-PrOH spin-coat. 84-437 MEA O’Brien et al. 2008 i-PrOH -dip-coat. dip-coat. -~40 ~20 five spins dip- or spin-coat. spin-coat.
36-247 (after multiple dipping)
ZAD 0.1 reflux at 80°C for 180 min
addition of LiOH⋅H2O
ZAD 0.6 stirring at 60°C for 30 min
ZAD 0.05-1 reflux at 80°C for 120-180 min; stirring at 60°C for 120 min
ZAD 0.3-1.3 stirring at 50°C for 60 min
ZAD DEA 0.03-0.1 room temperature
Dutta et al. 2008
MEA Kim et al. 2005
MEA TEA Lactic acid Znaidi et al. 2003 MEA DEA Ohyama et al. 1996 -Spanhel and Anderson 1991
chelating
agent
Our approach
•
•
Precursor: Zinc Acetate Dihydrate:
Precursor:
Zn(CH
3
COO)
2
·2H
2
O (ZAD)
•
•
Solvent: Ethanol Anhydrous: C
Solvent:
2
H
5
OH
(EtOH)
•
•
Additives: 1) Acetic Acid: CH
Additives:
3
COOH (HAc)
•
2) Triethanolamine: N(C
2
H
4
OH)
3
(TEA)
Whole process is at room temperature
(with TEA)
Our approach
Acetic Acid plays different roles: decreases the pH of the solution, influencing
both the hydrolysis and the solubility equilibria of ZAD; produces acetate ions
that act as complexing
agents for the Zn
2+ions influencing the
hydrolysis/condensation equilibria of oxo-acetato species
Zn
2+O
O
CH
3TEA acts as tetra dentate ligand for the Zn
2+ions stabilizing them in the
solution, moreover it increases the viscosity of the starting solution.
N
OH
OH
OH
Starting Solution Dip‐coating the solution on glass substrates Drying the film at 100°C in air for 2 hours Annealing the film in air or nitrogen environment for 2 hours
ZAD in EtOH: 0.1 M
ZAD in EtOH with HAc:0.5 M
ZAD in EtOH with TEA:
0.5 M; 0.6 M; 0.75 M;
1.0 M ( Visc.= 6.5 cP); 1.2 M
Synthesis procedure
Corning 1737
500
550
600
½ ‐ 1 ‐ 2
½ ‐ 1 ‐ 2
½ ‐ 1 ‐ 2
T (°C)
t (hours)
Room Temperature SP Temperature Time of plateau SR=10°C/min 5°C/minWettability of the substrate
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
I
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
Water
Contact Angle (
d
egr
ees)
Chemical etching
A
Cleaning in common
soap solution
Etching in NaOH
Washing in ethanol
Washing in water
(A) cleaning in common soap solution; (B) chemical etching in
Piranha solution for 2 minutes; (C) etching in Piranha solution
for 15 min.; (D) etching in 0.25M NaOH solution for 2 min.; (E)
etching in 0.25M NaOH solution for 15 min.; (F) etching in
0.5M NaOH solution for 2 min.; (G) etching in 0.5M NaOH
solution for 15 min.; (H) etching in 0.75 M NaOH solution for 2
30 40 50 60 70 (2 01 ) (1 12 ) (1 03 ) (1 10 ) (1 02 ) (1 01 ) (0 02 ) (1 00 ) 0.5 M TEA 0.12 M Intensity (a.u.) 2θ (°) 0.5 M HAc 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 M=0.5 TEA M=0.5 HAc Solution Thickness (nm)
Average Crystal size (nm)
M=0.12 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 8 10 Elec trical Re sistivity ( Ω∗ cm) x103 20 40 60 80 100 T ran sm it tan ce ( % ) M=0.15 M=0.5 TEA M=0.5 acetic acid Glass • Corning 1737 • 0.12 M • 0.5 M HAc • 0.5 M TEA
30
40
50
60
70
(201) (112) (103) (110) (102) (10 1 ) (002) (100)Intensity (
a.u.)
2
θ
(°)
1.2 M 1.0 M 0.75 M 0.6 M 0.5 M 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1.2 1.0 0.75 0.6Molar Concentration (mol/l) 0.5 Thicknes s ( n m) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 1.2 1.0 0.75 0.6 0.5
Average Crystal Size (nm
)
Morphological characterization (AFM)
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
Roughness
RMS (nm)
Molar Concentration (mol/l)
0.5 M
1.0 M
The roughness increases with the
molar concentration: the maximum is
achieved at 1.0 M and is about 7 nm,
higher than the rugosity obtained with
sputtering
Morphological characterization (SEM)
500 nm
SEM image of ZnO thin
80 84 88 92 1.2 1.0 0.75 0.6 T ransmittance ( % )
Molar Concentration (mol/l)
0.5
Optical characterization
average transmittance in
the visible region
Optical Bandgap
versus Molar
Concentration
Molar
Molar
Concentration
Concentration
(mol/l)
Absorption coefficient versus
Photon Energy, the intercept of the
linear curve with the x-axis give the
value of the optical bandgapc
(mol/l)
Optical
Optical
Bandgap
Bandgap
(
(
eV
eV
)
)
0.5
3.282
0.6
3.275
0.75
3.272
1.0
3.249
1.2
3.243
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
x 10
6Photon Energy (eV)
[α
*h
ν]
2(cm
-2eV
2)
Optical characterization
Electrical characterization
12
14
16
18
20
22
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Electr
ical Resistivity (
Ω∗
cm)
Crystal size (nm)
Air
Nitrogen
x 10
310
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2 h -600°C
1 h -600°C
Inte
nsity (a.u.)
2
θ (degrees)
1/2 h -600°C
1.0 M
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 2 1Time of annealing (hours) Thickness (nm)
Average Crystal Size (nm)
1/2
Annealing: time-temperature
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2 1 Averag e Crystal Size (nm)Annealing Time (hours)
T= 500°C T= 550°C T= 600°C 1/2