• No results found

Calculation of torque

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Calculation of torque"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Calculation of torque

Forces on metric v-thread:

Characteristics: d = Nominal thread  (mm) p = Pitch (mm) d2 = Flank  = d-0.64952p (mm)  VSM  = Pitch angle =        2 arctan d p =       0.64952 ) ( arctan p d p (°)  = Half flank angle = 30°  VSM

 = Coefficient of friction of steel/ground steel 0.15

 = Friction angle on v-thread (°)

 =

         cos tan arctan cos arctan   is a relatively small angle simplified:  =         cos arctan =        30 cos 15 . 0 arctan = 9.826°

The following also applies:

Ft = FLtan

 

 with '+' for tightening and '–' for loosening

Calculation of the torque MA/L and axial force FL on the thread:

MA/L = F r = 2 2 d Ft = 0.5d2FLtan

 

Therefore: FL M =F r

M = torque that is exerted on the adjusting nut (Nmm) F = Leverage (N) r = Lever arm (mm) FL = Axial force (N) FN = Normal force (N) FR = Frictional force (N) Ft = Tangential force (N) M =A = tightening torque (Nmm) M =L = loosening torque (Nmm)

(2)

FL =

     tan 5 . 0 2 / d MA L =                 tan arctan 9.826 5 . 0 2 2 /  d p d MA L =

                9.826 ) 64952 . 0 ( arctan tan 64952 . 0 5 . 0 /  p d p p d MA L

  is a relatively small angle

We assume an average value of 0.9° (please see table below)

M6x0.5 M8x0.75 M11x1 M25x1 M50x1.5 M55x2 M150x2 M155x2 M200x3 1.6° 1.82° 1.76° 0.749° 0.558° 0.679° 0.245° 0.357° 0.276° FL =

    0.64952 tan0.9 9.826 5 . 0 / p d MA L

 for further simplification we use only d instead of (d-0.64952p)

FL =

     tan 0.9 9.826 5 . 0 / d MA L Tighten: FL = d MA  0947 . 0  MA 0.0947FLd Loosen: FL = d ML  0.0785  ML 0.0785FLd

Calculation of the frictional torque adjusting nut – bearing surface M =R: M L M L M L R F d d F d F M       0.075  2 15 . 0 2  Simplified with dM  d: d F MR 0.075 L Note:

MR only comes into effect if the adjusting nut is pressing on the bearing surface.

Torque being exerted on the adjusting nut: Tighten: d F d F d F M M MAR 0.0947 L  0.075 L 0.17 LLoosen: 2 15 . 0 2 075 . 0 0785 . 0 F d F d n F d F d n F d M M M MLRG   L   L    R   L   R Note: Derivation of MG please see below

Values still to be taken into account:

Surface pressure on the thread flanks  max. axial load

MR = Frictional torque adjusting nut –

bearing surface (Nmm)

 = Coefficient of friction  0.15

dM = Average surface  of adjusting

(3)

zul L L Pa H d p m F A F Pa       1 2 

d p

p p m Pa FLzul  0.64952 0.54126 Simplified: p d p m Pa FLzul  0.54126 And shear stress on thread

zul L m d F       2

d p

m FL zul  0.64952  Simplified: m d FL zul  

Braking effect of gib MRR/MRR-A (radial)      G cos60 R F F

With  = 3.23°  average value of thread M4-M12 And                 13 30 cos 2 . 0 arctan cos arctan    

          13 23 . 3 tan 5 . 0 tan 5 . 0 St AI St AI G d M d M F

 with the simplification d2StdSt

Tighten:

St AI St AI G d M d M F         1455 . 0 13 23 . 3 tan 5 . 0 Therefore: St AI G R d M F F cos600.2 0.687

Tightening torque MAI (Nmm) of the grub screw as per Bossard T.037 for M4-M16:

M4 M5 M6 M8 M10 M12 M14 M16

1000 3000 5000 10000 20000 45000 45000 90000

Therefore for FR (N) for one gib:

M4 M5 M6 M8 M10 M12 M14 M16

171.75 412.2 572.5 858.75 1374 2576.25 2208.2 3864.37 Therefore the result for frictional torque MG:

2 687 . 0 2 d d M n d F n M St AI R G        d d M n M St AI G 0.343   Pazul = 80-150 N/mm2  Gieck Z18

m/p = Number of thread pitches = thread length/pitch d2 = Flank  = d0.64952p (mm)

F L = Axial force (N)

H1 = Thread load-bearing depth (VSM) = 0.54126p (mm)

m = Adjusting nut height (mm) zul = 560 N/mm2  Mechanical

engineering p.39

MAI = Tightening torque of grub screw (Nmm)

FG = Axial force of grub screw (N)

FR = Frictional force of gib on adjusting nut thread. (N)

 = Coefficient of friction grub screw – adjusting nut0.2

dSt =  of grub screw (mm)

MG = Braking torque of gib on

adjusting nut thread (Nmm) d =  of adjusting nut thread (mm) dSt =  of grub screw (mm)

n = Number of gibs

MAI = Tightening torque of grub screw

(4)

Braking effect of gib MRA/MRA-A (axial) t E F F sin with E AI t r M FE AI E r M F sin Therefore:      E cos60 R F

F (please see above)

1 . 0 sin 2 . 0 5 . 0 sin 60 cos           E AI E AI E R r M r M F F   

Therefore the result for frictional torque MG:

2 d F n MG   Rd r M n M E AI G 0.05 sin  Note:

The angle  is dependent on which position the gib has been ground. The tolerances when manufacturing the eccentric, as well as the gib, also have a great influence on the angle .

Sample calculation:

Assuming: An adjusting nut MRR 50x1.5 (2 gibs with M6) is used to clamp a spindle bearing.

The maximum axial load on the bearing must not exceed 10,000 N. What are the tightening and loosening torques?

Tightening and loosening torque of the adjusting nut: Tighten:

FE = Force of eccentric on gib (N)

Ft = Tangential force on eccentric (N)

rE = Radius on outer surface of eccentric (mm)

MAI = Tightening torque on eccentric (Nmm)

 = Angle of eccentric to gib (°)

FR = Frictional force of gib on adjusting nut thread.

(N)

 = Coefficient of friction gib – adjusting nut  0.2

Ft

FE

rE

MAI

MG = Braking torque of gib on

adjusting nut thread (Nmm) d =  of adjusting nut thread (mm) n = Number of gibs

(5)

Nmm d F M M MAR 0.17 L  0.17100005085000 Loosen: 2 15 . 0 2 075 . 0 0785 . 0 F d F d n F d F d n F d M M M MLRG   L   L   R   L   RNmm M 0.1510000502572.525103625

Check surface pressure/shear stress  max. axial load:

N p d p m Pa FL zul 50 0.54 1.5 178128 5 . 1 14 150 54 . 0               OK N m d FL zul   56050141231504 OK

Assuming: An adjusting nut MRR 100x2 (2 gibs with M8) is used to clamp a spindle bearing.

The maximum axial load on the bearing must not exceed 25,000 N. What are the tightening and loosening torques?

Tightening and loosening torque of the adjusting nut: Tighten: Nmm d F M M MAR 0.17 L 0.1725000100425000 Loosen: 2 15 . 0 2 075 . 0 0785 . 0 F d F d n F d F d n F d M M M MLRG   L   L   R   L   RNmm M 0.15250001002858.7550460875

Check surface pressure/shear stress  max. axial load:

N p d p m Pa FL zul 100 0.54 2 508938 2 20 150 54 . 0               OK N m d FL zul   560100203518583 OK

References

Related documents

Debido a este éxito, además de hablar de la música y de los artistas en sí, la revista también dará a conocer los lugares donde está presente este estilo en el

Mean monthly runoff from all future simulations (three downscaling methods and three emission 348. scenarios) are presented in Figure 7 along with the baseline simulations with

nova powers are inherentlydangerous to mankind? Which novas themselves harbor the potential to abuse their pow- ers? Which countries are taking advantage of the changes

For vertical composite walls where a berm or significant toe is present in front of the wall, an adjusted version of the method for plain vertical walls should be used (see Fig..

This is the second in a sequence of three accelerated courses designed to enable students to take higher level mathematics courses during their high school career including

However, a few science fiction movies were included on the list, based on their presentation of hacking scenarios, for example, the robot R2D2 in Star Wars (1977) is clearly

AB „Snaigė“ plastmasių perdirbimo padalinio tobulinimo kryptys, įvertinant tyrimo pagal Lean metodiką rezultatus Susumavus gamybos taupumo kokybinio ir kiekybinio tyrimo

Theoretical underpinning from the resource advantage theory of competition and literature review led to the opinion that operational performance mediates