• No results found

Net Present Value Risk Analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Net Present Value Risk Analysis"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Net Present Value Risk Analysis

an example of using risk management to shape a project’s solution

(2)

Common-practice Project Risk Management

Brainstorm, Checklists etc. Risk Registe r Prob -Impact Matrix Actions Project Objectives

(3)

Full Process - PRAM Guide (APM, 2004)

Multi-pass Process

(4)

Road Bridge Project

City

Town

Town

Town

1

2

Two options for the

location of a new

road bridge

Regional authority

invites tenders from

industry

Option 2 is the

higher capital cost

(5)

Conditions of the Invitation to Tender

• The contractor may bid for either Option 1, Option 2 or both options

• Selected contractor will be awarded a 20-year contract

• The contractor will bear the costs of building the bridge, but will have exclusive rights to collect tolls until the end of the 20-year period.

You are the project risk manager employed by one of the

contractors in receipt of the invitation to tender

(6)

A Useful Point about Risk Analysis

“The biggest uncertainty in a risk analysis is whether we started off analysing the right thing and in the right way”

David Vose (2008) – Risk Analysis 3rd Edition

Risk analysis should be designed to answer specific questions. The first task is to verify that the right questions have been identified.

What are the right risk questions at this stage in the road bridge project? 1. Should the company pursue this opportunity?

(7)

Should the Company Pursue this Opportunity?

Recommended approach – Net Present Value Risk Analysis

Σ

NPV =

t = 0 n

C / (1 + D)

t n

Ct = the net cash flow over a period of time (typically 1 year), t = the period of time during which that cash flow takes place, D = the discount rate (rate of real terms loss in the value of cash expressed as a percentage - typically per annum) and

n = the number of periods of time periods (typically years) over which NPV is calculated

(8)

Inputs to the NPV Risk Model

(9)

@RISK for Excel Net Present Value Risk Model

First cycle of the risk management process

- Risk Model demonstration

(10)

Outputs from the NPV Risk Model

Answer to Question 1: A polite no bid letter

(11)
(12)
(13)

Improved Conditions of Invitation to Tender

• National government will fund 50% of the capital costs up to a maximum of £50M

• The contractor may bid for either Option 1, Option 2 or both options

• Selected contractor will be awarded a 20-year contract

• The contractor will bear the costs of building the bridge, but will have exclusive rights to collect tolls until the end of the 20-year period.

As your risk manager, what is your advice?

1. Rerun the first pass risk model with the changed condition 2. Develop a revenue risk model Second cycle of risk

(14)
(15)

@RISK for Excel Net Present Value Risk Model

Second cycle of the risk management process

- Risk Model demonstration

(16)

Output from the Second Cycle of Risk Analysis

(17)

Risk Management Process Third Cycle - Commercial Strategy

Revenue

Sources of uncertainty

1. Future traffic trends

Future city development

Cost 2. Opening date 3. Planning consents Materials Contracting strategy Bridge design Bridge design

Influenced by

Contractor Contractor Economic conditions Regional authority Contractor Regional authority Economic growth Mutual agreement Toll charges

(18)

Summary of Important Points

• Risk Management can be used to shape the project solution

• An iterative top-down approach is required to do this

• The most important sources of uncertainty may be those associated with economic benefits rather that project delivery

• NPV risk analysis can be used to make choices between mutually exclusive options

• Understanding relevant sources of uncertainty is important

• The commercial solution should align liability for cost with influence over key sources of uncertainty

(19)

The Project Risk Maturity Model – Level 4

The risk management process leads to the selection of risk-efficient strategic choices when setting project objectives and choosing between options for project solutions or

delivery. Sources of uncertainty that could affect the achievement of project objectives are managed systematically within the

context of a team culture conducive to optimising project outcomes.

References

Related documents