(Received February 17, 1970; revision accepted for publication September 28, 1970.) ADDRESS FOR REPRINTS: (E.R.C.) 1650 Walnut Street, Berkeley, California 94709.
TETRACYCLINES
AND
PERMANENT
TEETH:
THE
RELATION
BETWEEN
DOSE
AND
TOOTH
COLOR
Elmer R. Grossman, M.D., Alexander Walchek, D.D.S., and Helen Freedman, Ph.D.
with the technical assistance of Cynthia Flanagan, L.D.H.
From the Department of Pediatrics, University of California-San Francisco it! edical Center, San Francisco, California
ABSTRACT. A quantitative estimation of the
dark-ening effect of tetracychines on permanent incisors
was made b correlating tooth colors with the
re-corded history of tetracycline exposure in 160
children under our care since infancy. The average
darkening caused by one 6-day course of oral
tet-racvcline or demethylchlortetracycline during the
years of permanent incisor formation was 0.3 of a shade on a 14 shade dental scale. Children with
five such courses of tetracycline therapy during the
first 43 to 5 years of life had permanent incisors averaging about two shades darker than children
with no tetracycline exposure, a nearly
impercepti-ble and cosmetically negligible difference; however,
3 of these 14 children had moderately darkened
teeth.
With greater frequency of tetracycline exposure,
the risk increases; four of our six patients with
eight or more courses had noticeably dark teeth.
After age 6 for girls and 7 for boys the risk of
tet-racycline staining can be ignored since the
cosmeti-cally important anterior teeth have all formed. When tetracycline therapy is indicated during the
first 6 to 7 years, the use of oxytetracycline (or
pos-sibly doxycychine) may diminish tooth darkening.
Pediatrics, 47:567, 1971, TETRACYCLINES; TEETH.
I
T has been known for some years that tetracyclines darken teeth if adminis-tered during the time of tooth crownforma-tion.14 What has not been known, however, is the quantitative relationship between tet-racyclines and tooth color. How much
dark-ening of teeth will result from a given amount of tetracyclines? Is there a safe level of use at which the resultant effect on
tooth color is cosmetically unimportant? We have attempted to answer these ques-tions for the effect of tetracycline and de-methylchlortetracycline
(
Declomycin) onpermanent teeth.
PROCEDURE
We studied 160 children aged 6 to 12
years all of whom had been under the care
of the Berkeley Pediatric Medical Group
since infancy. Any child who had received antibiotic therapy elsewhere was excluded except in those few in whom drug and dose information was obtained from the other physicians. The history of tetracycline ex-posure was tabulated by drug, age of pa-tient, and courses of treatment. Although
there was some variation in dose and
dura-tion of treatment, demethylchlortetracy-dine was usually given at 6 mg/lb/day and tetracycline at 10 mg/lb/day for 6
days.
When
the
treatment record indicated that medicine was ordered 7 or more days after a preceding course, we considered this to be an additional course of treatment.The dental examination consisted of
cleaning the anterior teeth followed by
in-spection under a standard dental light, un-der light from a north window, and with tl-traviolet
(
Wood’s)
light. Tooth color wasdetermined separately by a dental hygienist
(
C. F.)
and a dentist (A. W. ), using a standard tooth shade guide(
Bioform)
. TheBioform shade guide numbers 59-72 are expressed as - 1 to 13 for ease of
computa-tion and clarity of expression in the statisti-cal evaluation. Permanent incisors tend to be somewhat lighter colored than perma-nent cuspids. If cuspids as well as incisors were erupted and there was a difference in
13
12
11
GREY 10
HUE
YELLOW
HUE 0
0
I’)
I
I-.
0 0
.
COURSES OF TETRACYCLINES GIVEN DURING FORMATION OF PERMANENT INCISORS
Fic. 1. The relation of tooth color to tetracyclines given during formation of permanent incisor crowns. The central heavy line is the line best fitting the mean incisor colors (95% confidence limits).
568 TETRACYCLINES AND PERMANENT TEETH
#{176}
I-
. . ____________________________ ___________________MILKY 1 :u..::... .
-..---.-
___________________________________
.________________________WHITE UI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
color independently to a recording
secre-tary. Neither knew the other’s judgment of tooth color nor did they have access to the tetracycline exposure history of the
pa-tients.#{176}
Data were analyzed for
(
1)
the relation between tooth shade and the number of courses of tetracycline and demethylchlor-tetracycline given during the years of crown formation(
2) the relation of tooth color to medication given after crown for-mation was complete and(
3)
the differ-ence between exposure in the first year only and exposure at age 3 and 4 years.RESULTS
Figure 1 shows a clear linear relationship
between number of courses of tetracyclines and tooth color. The average darkening of tooth color is about 0.3 of a shade per course-an exceedingly small amount, so that a child who had five courses of
tetracy-#{176}Average inter-observer difference was 1.6 on
our 14 point scale; agreement was closest on
lighter teeth. There was most difference in judging
the darkest teeth because variation in hue made a
precise match to the standards difficult.
clime or demethylchlortetracycline during the 43 to 5 years of incisor crown formation
had an average tooth shade which was less than two guide numbers darker than a
child who was never exposed to the tetracy-dines. The difference is nearly impercepti-ble to an untrained eye and of no cosmetic importance.
Variation in the color of permanent teeth at any level of tetracycline exposure is
strik-ing. Our 33 patients with no tetracycline had incisors of average color 0.86 with a
spread of - 1 to + 6.5; the 14 patients with
five exposures to tetracycline had an aver-age of 2.57 with a spread from - 1 to 8.
Our data confirm the fact that staining
occurs only if tetracyclines are given during the period of crown calcification. No corre-lation was found between incisor color and
exposure to tetracyclines after 4% years for girls and 5 years for boys, the ages at which the permanent incisors have completed crown formation (Fig. 2).
Comparison between the 12 children
0 0 U I 0 0 YELLOW flUE 6 IVORY 7 ---‘ - % ,_ 1 F I OR 4 CREAM WHITE 3-I I I, F I #{149}% I %\ I/
I “I 0 -1 .
--‘1
- ..._--#{149}.. /1-*-90% of doto MILKY
WHITE 1 1 1 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
COURSES OF TETRACYCLINES GIVEN AFTER
FORMATION OF PERMANENT INCISORS
Fm. 2. The relation of tooth color to tetracycines given after formation of permanent incisor crowns.
ARTICLES
569DISCUSSION
Though these data refer to the color of the permanent incisors, cuspids and first bi-cuspids are also highly visible teeth. The
cuspids complete their crown formation at 5 years in girls and 63 in boys, the first bi-cuspids at 6 in girls and 7 in boys, and the second bicuspids about a year later.5 For dental appearance, then, the period to age
6 years in girls and 7 in boys is most impor-tant. Staining of the less visible second bi-cuspids and molars does not concern us
here.
If we extrapolate our results from incisor color to include the cosmetically important teeth, we can say that tetracycline and
demethylchlortetracycline used sparingly in the first 6 years for girls and 7 years for boys are likely to darken teeth very little.
At our dose level, a child with five courses of tetracyclines had teeth two shades darker than a child without; the risk of mild noticeable darkening was 3/ 14. However,
heavier use carries a more substantial risk;
four of our six patients with eight or more courses had moderate darkening.
None of these children had the enamel
hypoplasia of the permanent teeth associ-ated with high doses of tetracyclines.6 In general, the permanent teeth showed less
tetracycline effect than primary teeth
be-cause the larger, thicker, darker, and more opaque permanent teeth more effectively
hid the bands of tetracycline-complex laid down in the enamel and dentin.T In a recent study8 of extracted deciduous molars, the teeth were sectioned and the bands of tetra-cycline-complex counted, each band
repre-senting the effect of one course of tetracy-dine. Discoloration of the crown was noted in most of the deciduous teeth showing six or more bands, a risk of staining which
ap-pears to be higher than we found for
per-manent incisors.
The variability of staining with similar tetracycline exposure remains a problem. Some of this must be due to differences in administration-variable teaspoon size,
for-gotten doses, early discontinuance of
medi-cation. Part of
the
variability has been as-cribed to the intermittent nature of tooth calcffication; only when tetracycline ad-ministration coincides with activeminerali-zation does a band of staining resuIt. A
third factor is the age of exposure. Brearley and Storey8 found darker staining in
pri-mary teeth when the earliest formed dentin
(
near the dentino-enamel junction)
showed a band of tetracycline. Our limited data fails to confirm this for permanent teeth.We have no information on the question
of relative stain-producing properties of the
various tetracyclines. We have used mostly
demethylchlortetracycline during the past
570 TETRACYCLINES AND PERMANENT TEETH
Numerous authors 2,4,941 have noted less
intense staining with oxytetracycline
(
Ter-ramvcin
)
than with the other commonly used congeners. Furthermore, the creamydiscoloration due to oxytetracycline is sta-ble, unlike other tetracyclines whose stain
may darken with exposure to light.2’10’12’13 Doxvcvcline, a semi-synthetic derivative of oxytetracycline, binds less to calcium than other tetracyclines do. For this reason it might be expected to cause less tooth
stain-ing. One recent report suggests that this may be the case.’4
CONCLUSION
Demethvlchlortetracycline and tetracy-dine used in normal oral doses no more than five times in the first 5 years of life
cause a very mild, cosmetically trivial dark-ening of permanent incisor color in most children. The risk of noticeable discolor-ation with five exposures is about 1/5. With increasing frequency of exposure or with higher doses, darkening of an
objec-tionable nature is increasingly likely. After age 6 for girls and 7 for boys, the danger of tooth discoloration from tetracyclines can
be ignored since the crowns of the incisors, cuspids, and first bicuspids have formed by then. When a tetracycline is indicated dur-ing the first 6 to 7 years, the use of oxytetra-cycline (or possibly doxycycline) may fur-ther diminish the risk of dental staining.
REFERENCES
1. Schwachman, H., and Schuster, A.: The tetra-cychines: Applied pharmacology. Pediat. Clin. N. Amer., 3:295, 1956.
2. \Vallman, I. S., and Hilton, H. C.: Teeth
pig-mented by tetracycline. Lancet, 1 :827, 1962.
3. Weyman, J., and Porteous, J. R. : Tetracycline
discolouration and bands in human teeth.
Brit. Dent. J., 115:499, 1963.
4. Toaff, R., and David, R. :Tooth discolouration
due to tetracycline. In Meyler, L. and Peck,
H. M., ed : Drug Induced Diseases, Vol. 3.
New York: Excerpta Medica Foundation.
1963, pp. 117-133, 1963.
5. Nolla, C. M. : The development of the
perma-nent teeth. Cited in Watson, E. W., and
Lowrey, C. H. :Growth and Development of Children, ed. 2. Chicago: Year Book
Publish-ers, pp. 269-270, 1954.
6. Witkop, C. J., and Wolf, R. 0. : Hypoplasia
and intrinsic staining of enamel following tetracycline therapy. J.A.M.A., 185:1008, 1963.
7. Stewart, D. J.:Tetracychines: Their prevalence
in children’s teeth. Brit. Dent. J., 124:318,
1968.
8. Brearley, L. J., and Storey, E. : Tetracycline
in-duced tooth changes. Med. J. Aust., 2:714,
1968.
9. Annotation: Tetracychines and the teeth. Lan-cet, 2:71, 1965.
10. Weyman, J.: Clinical appearance of
tetracy-dine staining of the teeth. Brit. Dent. J.,
121:118, 1965.
11. Keitel, H. C., and Soentgen, M. L.: Letter to the editor. Canad. Med. Ass. J., 93:129, 1965.
12. Kline, A. H., Blatther, R. J., and Lunin, M.:
Transplacental effects of tetracycline on teeth. J.A.M.A., 188: 178, 1964.
13. Owen, L. N.: Effects of administering tetracy-cline to young dogs with particular
refer-ence to localization of the drugs in the teeth. Arch. Oral Biol., 8:715, 1963.
14. Forti, C., and Benincori, C.: Letter to the edi-tor. Lancet, 1:782, 1969.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful for the helpful organizational