• No results found

CREATING SQL SERVER DISASTER RECOVERY SOLUTIONS WITH SIOS DATAKEEPER

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CREATING SQL SERVER DISASTER RECOVERY SOLUTIONS WITH SIOS DATAKEEPER"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Learn how DataKeeper Cluster Edition can be used to create disaster recovery solutions for SQL Server deployments.

By Allan Hirt, SQLHA LLC

 

CREATING SQL SERVER DISASTER

RECOVERY SOLUTIONS WITH

(2)

• Log shipping

A geographically dispersed failover cluster involves mirroring of the storage at the hardware level, which means the solution is essentially not being controlled by the DBAs. Database mirroring is depreacated in SQL Server 2012 and is not really a recommended solution. Availability groups is a feature introduced in SQL Server 2012 and has aspects of both a clustered implementation of SQL Server as well as database mirroring. Depending on the solution desired, availability groups could potentially be a complex deployment. Last but not least, log shipping is based on backup and restore and is arguably the most common method of creating a disaster recovery solution.

There is also another option available to you: use a non-Microsoft solution such as DataKeeper Cluster Edition. This paper will discuss how DataKeeper can be used to create disaster recovery for SQL Server deployments.

DataKeeper Cluster Edition Disaster Recovery Solutions

for SQL Server

There are three ways that DataKeeper Cluster Edition can be part of a disaster recovery solution for SQL Server

• Geographically dispersed failover cluster

• Amazon EC2 Cloud-based high availability and disaster recovery • Hybrid solution for an on-premise/cloud solution

Geographically Dispersed Windows Server Failover Cluster

The concept of a geographically dispersed Windows Server failover cluster (WSFC) is simple: the cluster nodes are split across two different sites. If shared storage is used as part of the cluster, the storage must somehow be mirrored from Site 1 to Site 2. Since the most common method to create a clustered instance of SQL Server on a WSFC, also known as an FCI, is to use shared storage for its databases and backups. DataKepper Cluster Edition has already been able to be used as part of this type of configuration for a long time, so it is already a proven solution. It would look something like what is shown in Figure 1.

(3)

Figure 1. Example geographically dispersed WSFC

This solution is also similar to the one described in the paper “Creating Non-Shared Storage SQL Server Failover Cluster Instances with SIOS DataKeeper and Fusion-io”, so that solution can be extended to be a diaster recovery one as well.One thing that has not yet been discussed in the prior paper or this one is that DataKeeper Cluster Edition can have multiple targets from a single source. So it can not only be used to create disaster recovery, but in the case of something like the Fusion-io solution with SQL Server, it can create both high availability and disaster recovery without ever needing shared storage.

For SQL Server professionals, the biggest difference with a solution like this is that it is block level, not transactional. This means that the bits on the disk are transferred from A to B at a low level and SQL Server has no interaction with it. Solutions like availability groups and log shipping are based on SQL Server transactions. Both are valid, and SQL Server will be consistent if you bring up your disaster recovery solution (meaning that if there is an incomplete transaction, it will not get applied). It is also worth noting that while it is a WSFC, when switching sites, there generally is some manual

intervention somewhere in the process to get the disaster recovery site functional. You need to understand the pros and cons of each type of solution before embarking on the right solution for you. The biggest challenge in any geographically dispersed WSFC solution is networking. Discussing networking at length is outside the scope of this paper, but realize that to have a reliable and

(4)

Figure 2. Using DataKeeper to make SQL Server available in EC2 in the same region

Figure 2 assumes that the standby SQL Server instance is not online and it would only be brought online in the event of an emergency. The proper processes would need to be in place to ensure that the instance which is offline could be brought online properly. By lowering the utilization of the standby server, you may be able to save some cost at the tradeoff of some time and processes needed to get up and running.

Another option is to use DataKeeper Cluster Edition to create a WSFC with an FCI in the cloud. SIOS is an Amazon Web Services Technology Partner. While creating a cluster may add a bit of complexity to an EC2 deployment, it allows you to use familiar deployment methods for SQL Server FCIs in the cloud. The solution would look something like Figure 3 if staying within the same Amazon EC2 region.

(5)

Figure 3. WSFC and FCI in EC2

If you did want to span regions and use the same region primarily for high availability and the second region for disaster recovery – just like a geographically dispersed cluster – the solution would look like Figure 4. The biggest concerns in this architecutre would be the placement of the file share witness (if applicable depending on the number of nodes) for quorum and if the node in the second EC2 region would be considered a vote in the WSFC.

Figure 4. Spanning regions with DataKeeper and EC2

As noted in the last section, keep in mind that DataKeeper provides block level protection and transfers I/Os, but does not transfer SQL Server transactions. EC2’s different instance sizes have varying amounts of network bandwidth associated with them. The amount of network throughput would affect DataKeeper. Therefore you would need to ensure that you choose the right instance size based on your usage of SQL Server. For more information on selecting an Amazon EC2 instance, see http://amzn.to/172weuF.

Hybrid On-Premise/Cloud Disaster Recovery

(6)

While DataKeeper Cluster Edition is the focus of this paper, SIOS also has two other products that could help you achieve high availability and disaster recover with SQL Server – SIOS Protection Suite and DataKeeper Standard Edition. SIOS Protection Suite is different from both DataKeeper editions because it uses SIOS’ proprietary clustering technology and does not integrate with nor can it utilize a WSFC. DataKeeper Standard Edition also does not require WSFC. Standard Edition can provide protection akin to the scenario shown in Figure 2 in the cloud where the secondary SQL Server instance would be not be online but the disks would be replicated. The instance could then be brought online manually and the databases attached in SQL Server.

These other two editions are options for those where Cluster Edition may not fit either the budget or solution that you are trying to put in place. For more information on DataKeeper Standard Edition, see http://bit.ly/1af57j7, and for more information about SIOS Protection Suite, consult

http://bit.ly/198bcgT.

SIOS Protection Suite DataKeeper Standard Edition

DataKeeper Cluster Edition

Multi-Subnet Failover Yes Yes – manual failover

only

Only with SQL 2012 Enterprise Edition

Integrates with Windows Server Failover Clustering

No No Yes

Windows Server Versions and Editions Supported

2003/R2 (Standard, Enterprise, Datacenter) 2008/R2 (Standard Enterprise, Datacenter) 2012 2003/R2 (Standard, Enterprise, Datacenter) 2008/R2 (Standard Enterprise, Datacenter) 2012 (Standard, Datacenter) 2003/R2 (Enterprise, Datacenter) 2008/R2 (Enterprise, Datacenter) 2012 (Standard, Datacenter)

Requires Active Directory No No Yes

Supports Automated Failover

Yes No Yes

Supports Cloud

Deployments Yes Yes Yes

Table 1. Comparison of the SIOS clustering products

(7)

Conclusion

DataKeeper Cluster Edition has already been used for years for diaster recovery in the form of geographically dispersed WSFCs by being utilized to mirror the storage. This in effect makes any clustered instance of SQL Server configured on that WSFC part of the disaster recovery solution. Today, DataKeeper can be extended in other scenarios such as protecting installations in Amazon EC2 between availability zones as well as help you build hybrid solutions where the cloud is your disaster recovery story. Whether you are a traditional IT shop or one blazing trails with the cloud, SIOS has a disaster recovery solution for your SQL Server deployments.

References

Related documents

Describe how Microsoft SQL Server 2000 failover clustering works with Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Cluster service to help maximize availability.. Discuss how SQL Server

Figure 2 shows the basic AlwaysOn Availability Group deployment with two replicas configured for Synchronous-Commit mode with automatic failover to provide High Availability..

The cluster nodes are configured to host the SQL Server resource, the SQL Server FILESTREAM resource, and the SQL Server Agent and Analysis service resources.. 39 Introducing

To provide high availability and disaster protection for SQL Server in the cloud, you may want to configure a failover cluster with redundant application instances in different

The Disaster Recovery Orchestrator agent for SQL Server FILESTREAM enables FILESTREAM storage for the specified SQL Server instance, monitors its status, and disables it..

This module describes enhancements to SQL Server availability and data recovery features since SQL Server

 Acquire the knowledge of monitoring and troubleshooting using SQL Server tools  Learn how to manage security with SQL Server..  Discover high availability solutions within

configured prior to installing DataKeeper Cloud Edition, a repair installation of DataKeeper Cloud Edition is necessary before you are able to create a DataKeeper cluster