• No results found

Cf1 Design

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cf1 Design"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

DESIGN OF FOUNDATION F4 UNBRACED BAY

ALLOW.N.S.B.C = 150

ALLOW. N.S.B.C (SEISMIC CASE) = 187.5 = 40

ALLOW. N.S.B.C (WIND CASE) = 187.5 = 460

Unit Weight of Soil = 18 Clear Cover at Top = 75mm

ALLOW. G.S.B.C = 204.0 Clear Cover at Bottom = 75mm

ALLOW. G.S.B.C (SEISMIC CASE) = 241.5 Height of pedestal = 3.45m

ALLOW. G.S.B.C (WIND CASE) = 241.5 Depth of foundation below FGL = 3.00m

Increase in bearing capacity factor for Seis Load = 1.25 Lz = 5.00m

Increase in bearing capacity factor for Wind load = 1.25 Lx = 3.50m

t = 0.50m (Thickness of Footing) P1x = 0.80m P1z = 0.90m X Foundation CG P2x = 0.80m 3.50 Load CG P2z = 0.90m 1.75 FGL Lx = 3.50 0.80 0.80 Z ez 3.00 m 1.75 0.90 0.90 0.50 m 0.75 1.75 1.75 0.75 Lz = 5.00 Self Wt of Footing W1 = 218.75 kN Wt of soil above Fdn W2 = 722.70 kN Wt of pedestal W3 = 106.20 kN Total Wt. = 1047.65 kN

RCC Design (Self Wt. of Footing+Wt. of Surrounding Soil)

Design for 1m width of slab 57.5 KN/m P1 P2

Design for maximum net soil pressure under the footing 0.75 3.50 0.75

Load factor for concrete design = 1.4 Design along longitudinal direction :

Max. Cant Bm at face of column = 16.2x(0.75-0.45)^2/2 0.7 kNm 73.65 KN/m per m run

= 16.2x 3.5 ^2 /8 24.7 kNm 5.00 m Factored Mu (+Ve) = 1.022 kNm Factored Mu (-Ve) = 34.72 kNm Foundation Depth D = 500 mm Effective Depth d = 417 mm Width B = 1000mm kN/m2 kN/m2 Fck N/mm2 kN/m2 F y N/mm2 kN/m3 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 ex =(L X B-P1x XP1y - P2x X P2y)X(H-t)X18 =P1XXP1ZX(H-t)x25+P2XXP2ZX(H-t)x25

Negative

BM.at Center

(2)

Bottom Reinf. Top reinforcement :

% pt pt,prov % pt pt,prov

0.006 0.130 542.1 16 371 150 1340.413 0.32 0.20 0.13 542.1 16 371 150 1340.413 0.32

Max S.F along Z axis =16.2 x (0.75-0.9/2-0.417)x1 = 1.89 kN

Max factored Shear Stress = 0.01 N/mm²

pt, provided = 0.32 %

As per BS 8110-1:1997,Table 3.8 = 0.42 N/mm² OK Design along transverse direction :

Effective Depth d = 403 mm (Self Wt. of Footing+Wt. of Surrounding Soil)

Max BM at face of column =16.2 x (1.75-0.4)^2/2 = 14.7 kNm 57.5 Kn/m per m run

Max Shear at distance d =16.2 x (1.75-0.8/2-0.403)x1 = 15.294 kN 1.75 1.75

Mu/bd2 = 0.127 pt Reinf. = 0.100 Bottom Reinforcement % pt pt,prov 73.65 kN/m per m run 0.127 0.13 523.90 12 216 150 753.9822 0.187 3.50 Top Reinforcement

Provide Minimum Steel = 0.13 x 1000 x 403 /100 = 483.6

Provide 12 mm dia at 150 c/c

753.98 OK

0.187 %

Max factored Shear Stress =15.3x1.4x1000/(1000x403) = 0.05

= 0.36 OK

Refer Table 3.8 BS 8110-1:1997

Check for Punching Shear for U0 :

For Punching Shear Critical Section is considered at '1.5d' from the face of column all around.

Factored vertical load in column = 242 kN

Perimeter of the critical section = 3400 mm

Effective depth = 403 mm

Factored Shear Stress = 0.22 OK

Refer CL 3.7.7.2 BS 8110-1:1997

Check for Punching Shear for U1 :

For Punching Shear Critical Section is considered at '1.5d' from the face of column all around.

Factored vertical load in column = 242 kN

Perimeter of the critical section = 5617 mm

Effective depth = 403 mm

Factored Shear Stress = 0.13

Mu/bd2 Ast,mm2 Dia of

rein bar Reqd. spacing mm spacing provided Ast Pro. mm2 Mu/bd2 Ast,mm2 Dia of rein bar Reqd. spacing mm spacing provided Ast Pro. mm2 Tv=(Vu/bd) N/mm2

Mu/bd2 Ast,mm2 Dia of

rein bar Reqd. spacing mm spacing provided Ast Pro. mm2 mm2/ m run

Astprovided mm2 / m run

(Pt)prov.

N/mm2

Allow. Shear Stress

(T

c

)

N/mm2

N/mm2 Shear Stress <.8Sqrt(Fck) & 5N/mm2

N/mm2 Corrosponding τ

1.5d

Punching shear perimeter (U1), (Refer figure 3.23, BS-8110:1997)

Punching shear perimeter (U0), (Refer figure 3.23, BS-8110:1997)

(3)

20-007-CS-8180-00098 Revision 01Q Annexure - II Design Calculation of Combined Footing CF1 3 of 5

SHELL MARINA LOBP-GMP PROJECT

DESIGN CALCULATION FOR PIPE RACK PR5 - LOBP AREA

DESIGN OF COMBINED FOOTING CF1

ALLOW.GROSS S.B.C

=

200

ALLOW. GROSS S.B.C (WIND CASE)

=

250

=

35

Unit Weight of Concrete

=

25

=

420

Unit Weight of Soil

=

18

Clear Cover at Top

=

50

mm

ALLOW. NET S.B.C

=

160.5

Clear Cover at Bottom

=

75

mm

ALLOW. NET S.B.C (WIND LOAD)

=

210.5

Height of pedestal

=

2.10

m

Depth of foundation below FGL

=

2.00

m

INCREASE IN SBC FACTOR FOR WIND LOAD

=

1.25

Lz

=

6.00

m

Lx

=

2.60

m

t

=

0.50

m (Thickness of Footing)

P1x

=

1.00

m

P1z

=

1.00

m

X

Foundation CG

P2x

=

1.00

m

3.00

Load CG

P2z

=

1.00

m

1.30

FGL

Lx =

2.60

1.00

1.00

Z

ez

2.00 m

1.30

1.00

1.00

0.50

m

1.50

1.50

1.50

1.50

Lz =

6.00

Self Wt of Footing W1

=

195.00 kN

Wt of soil above Fdn W2

=

367.20 kN

Wt of pedestal W3

=

105.00 kN

Total Wt.

=

667.20 kN

kN/m

2

kN/m

2

F

ck

N/mm

2

kN/m

2

F

y

N/mm

2

kN/m

3

kN/m

2

kN/m

2

e

x

=(L X B-P

1x

X

P

1y

- P

2x

X P

2y

)X(H-t)X18

=P1

X

XP1

Z

XHx25+P2

X

XP2

Z

XHx25

P1

P2

(4)

RCC Design

(Self Wt. of Footing+Wt. of Surrounding Soil)

Design for 1m width of slab

39.5 kN/m

P1

P2

Design for maximum net soil pressure under the footing

1.50

3.00

1.50

Load factor for concrete design

=

1.5

Design along longitudinal direction :

Max. Cant Bm at face of column

=

171.5x(1.5-0.5)^2/2

85.8

kNm

211.00 kN/m per m run

=

171.5x 3 ^2 /8 -171.5x1.5^2/2

192.9

kNm

6.00 m

Factored Mu (+Ve)

=

128.625 kNm

Factored Mu (-Ve)

=

289.5 kNm

Foundation Depth D

=

500 mm

Effective Depth d

=

417 mm

Width B

=

1000

mm

K

=

K

=

=

0.02113

=

0.047567

Z

=

Min(d((0.5+Sqrt(0.25-K/0.9)),0.95d)

Z

=

Min(d((0.5+Sqrt(0.25-K/0.9)),0.95d)

=

396.15 mm

=

393.6534 mm

=

M/0.87fyZ

=

M/0.87fyZ

=

888.581 mm2

=

2012.64

mm2

Mu =

128.625 kNm

Mu =

289.50 kNm

M/fcbd² =

0.021 N/mm²

M/fcbd² =

0.048 N/mm²

pt =

0.130 %

(Refer Table 3.25, SS CP65: Part1: 1999)

pt =

0.130 %

Bottom Reinf.

Top reinforcement :

Mu/fcbd²

Min. % pt

pt,prov

Mu/fcbd² Min % pt

pt,prov

0.021

0.130

888.6

16

226

150

1340.413

0.32

0.05

0.13

2012.6

20

156

150

2094.395

0.5

Max S.F along Z axis

=171.5 x (1.5-1/2-0.417)x1

=

99.98 kN

Max factored Shear Stress

=

0.36 N/mm²

pt, provided

=

0.32 %

For values of τc Refer Table 3.8, SS CP65: Part1: 1999

=

0.53 N/mm²

OK

Negative BM.at Center

M/fcbd

2

M/fcbd

2

A

s

A

s

Ast,mm

2

Dia of

rein bar

Reqd.

spacing

mm

spacing

provided

Ast Pro.

mm

2

Ast,mm

2

Dia of rein

bar

Reqd.

spacing

mm

spacing

provided

Ast Pro.

mm

2

(5)

20-007-CS-8180-00098 Revision 01Q Annexure - II Design Calculation of Combined Footing CF1 5 of 5

SHELL MARINA LOBP-GMP PROJECT

DESIGN CALCULATION FOR PIPE RACK PR5 - LOBP AREA

=

379.05

mm

=

M/0.87fyZ

=

396.231555 mm2

Width

=

1000

Effective Depth d

=

399 mm

(Self Wt. of Footing+Wt. of Surrounding Soil)

Max BM at face of column =171.5 x (1.3-0.5)^2/2

=

54.9 kNm

39.5 kN/m per m run

Max Shear at distance d

=171.5 x (1.3-1/2-0.399)x1

=

68.772 kN

1.30

1.30

Mu/fcbd²

=

0.010

pt Reinf.

=

0.130

Bottom & Top Reinforcement

Mu/fcbd²

Min. % pt

pt,prov

211.00 kN/m per m run

0.010

0.13

396.23

20

793

150

2094.395

0.525

2.60

Max factored Shear Stress

=68.78x1.5x1000/(1000x399)

=

0.26

=

0.53

OK

For values of τc Refer Table 3.8, SS CP65: Part1: 1999

Check for Punching Shear

If the calculated shear stress does not exceed Design shear stress then

No further checks are required.

(Refer Clause 3.7.7.7, SS CP65: Part1: 1999)

A

s

N/mm

2

Ast,mm

2

Dia of

rein bar

Reqd.

spacing

mm

spacing

provided

Ast Pro.

mm

2

N/mm

2

Allow. Shear Stress(T

c

)

N/mm

2

References

Related documents

Client classification is an important means to understand the clientfor an enterprise.A reasonable and accurate identification of the commercial banks’ fund clientsis a

Our system builds on an external Linked Data repository (which might not be under our control) and takes as input an ontology which has two roles in the system: 1) to define the

nia have been observed to affect high-level and some low-level integration mechanisms, suggesting that people with schizophrenia may experience anomalies across dif- ferent stages

This study examines the link between household food insecurity and child behavior problems mediated through parental characteristics (parenting stress, parental warmth,

The Elder Care Payment Restitution Act eliminated the requirements of Act 13 for which suspected abuse of individuals with mental retardation under the age of 60 was reported to

41 El atentado se refiere al asesinato de tres abogados laboralistas de Comisiones Obreras, un estu- diante de Derecho y un administrativo, vinculados al Partido Comunista de

Figure 2: Residual CORT concentrations and CBG capacity for finches during two moult (2007, 2008) and breeding seasons (2008, 2009) and include values for Gouldian, long-tailed

telecommunications). Step 3: Company pays part of the registration fee. After obtaining the approval of the Registrar for registering the branch office, and the approval of the